Analysis of HIV Integrase Resistance in Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States

National Landscape of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Deceased Organ Donors in the United States

BACKGROUND

Organ transplantation from donors with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+) presents risks of donor-derived infections. Understanding clinical, immunologic, and virologic characteristics of HIV-positive donors is critical for safety.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of donors with HIV-positive and HIV false-positive (FP) test results within the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act in Action studies of HIV D+/R+ transplantation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02602262, NCT03500315, and NCT03734393). We compared clinical characteristics in HIV-positive versus FP donors. We measured CD4 T cells, HIV viral load (VL), drug resistance mutations (DRMs), coreceptor tropism, and serum antiretroviral therapy (ART) detection, using mass spectrometry in HIV-positive donors.

RESULTS

Between March 2016 and March 2020, 92 donors (58 HIV positive, 34 FP), representing 98.9% of all US HOPE donors during this period, donated 177 organs (131 kidneys and 46 livers). Each year the number of donors increased. The prevalence of hepatitis B (16% vs 0%), syphilis (16% vs 0%), and cytomegalovirus (CMV; 91% vs 58%) was higher in HIV-positive versus FP donors; the prevalences of hepatitis C viremia were similar (2% vs 6%). Most HIV-positive donors (71%) had a known HIV diagnosis, of whom 90% were prescribed ART and 68% had a VL <400 copies/mL. The median CD4 T-cell count (interquartile range) was 194/µL (77-331/µL), and the median CD4 T-cell percentage was 27.0% (16.8%-36.1%). Major HIV DRMs were detected in 42%, including nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (33%), integrase strand transfer inhibitors (4%), and multiclass (13%). Serum ART was detected in 46% and matched ART by history.

CONCLUSION

The use of HIV-positive donor organs is increasing. HIV DRMs are common, yet resistance that would compromise integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens is rare, which is reassuring regarding safety.

Transmitted Drug Resistance Among HIV-1 Diagnoses in the United States, 2014-2018

BACKGROUND

Transmitted HIV drug resistance can threaten the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Drug resistance testing is recommended at entry to HIV care in the United States and provides valuable insight for clinical decision-making and population-level monitoring.

METHODS

We assessed transmitted drug resistance-associated mutation (TDRM) prevalence and predicted susceptibility to common HIV drugs among U.S. persons with HIV diagnosed during 2014-2018 who had a drug resistance test performed ≤3 months after HIV diagnosis and reported to the National HIV Surveillance System and who resided in 28 jurisdictions where ≥20% of HIV diagnoses had an eligible sequence during this period.

RESULTS

Of 50,747 persons in the analysis, 9,616 (18.9%) had ≥1 TDRM. TDRM prevalence was 0.8% for integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI), 4.2% for protease inhibitors, 6.9% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and 12.0% for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Most individual mutations had a prevalence <1.0% including M184V (0.9%) and K65R (0.1%); K103N was most prevalent (8.6%). TDRM prevalence did not increase or decrease significantly during 2014-2018 overall, for individual drug classes, or for key individual mutations except for M184V (12.9% increase per year, 95% CI=5.6-20.6).

CONCLUSIONS

TDRM prevalence overall and for individual drug classes remained stable during 2014-2018; transmitted INSTI resistance was uncommon. Continued population-level monitoring of INSTI and NRTI mutations, especially M184V and K65R, is warranted amidst expanding use of second-generation INSTI and PrEP.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-resistance mutations for the surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance

BACKGROUND

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are expected to be widely adopted globally, requiring surveillance of resistance emergence and transmission.

OBJECTIVES

We therefore sought to develop a standardized list of INSTI-resistance mutations suitable for the surveillance of transmitted INSTI resistance.

METHODS

To characterize the suitability of the INSTI-resistance mutations for transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance (TDR) surveillance, we classified them according to their presence on published expert lists, conservation in INSTI-naive persons, frequency in INSTI-treated persons and contribution to reduced in vitro susceptibility. Mutation prevalences were determined using integrase sequences from 17302 INSTI-naive and 2450 INSTI-treated persons; 53.3% of the INSTI-naive sequences and 20.0% of INSTI-treated sequences were from non-B subtypes. Approximately 10% of sequences were from persons who received dolutegravir alone or a first-generation INSTI followed by dolutegravir.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine previously recognized (or established) INSTI-resistance mutations were present on one or more of four published expert lists. They were classified into three main non-overlapping groups: 29 relatively common non-polymorphic mutations, occurring in five or more individuals and significantly selected by INSTI treatment; 8 polymorphic mutations; and 22 rare mutations. Among the 29 relatively common INSTI-selected mutations, 24 emerged as candidates for inclusion on a list of INSTI surveillance drug-resistance mutations: T66A/I/K, E92G/Q, G118R, F121Y, E138A/K/T, G140A/C/S, Y143C/H/R/S, S147G, Q148H/R/K, N155H, S230R and R263K.

CONCLUSIONS

A set of 24 non-polymorphic INSTI-selected mutations is likely to be useful for quantifying INSTI-associated TDR. This list may require updating as more sequences become available from INSTI-experienced persons infected with HIV-1 non-subtype B viruses and/or receiving dolutegravir.

HIV drug resistance in a cohort of HIV-infected MSM in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To analyze HIV drug resistance among MSM recruited for participation in the HPTN 078 study, which evaluated methods for achieving and maintaining viral suppression in HIV-infected MSM.

METHODS

Individuals were recruited at four study sites in the United States (Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Birmingham, Alabama; and Boston, Massachusetts; 2016-2017). HIV genotyping was performed using samples collected at study screening or enrollment. HIV drug resistance was evaluated using the Stanford v8.7 algorithm. A multiassay algorithm was used to identify individuals with recent HIV infection. Clustering of HIV sequences was evaluated using phylogenetic methods.

RESULTS

High-level HIV drug resistance was detected in 44 (31%) of 142 individuals (Atlanta: 21%, Baltimore: 29%, Birmingham: 53%, Boston: 26%); 12% had multiclass resistance, 16% had resistance to tenofovir or emtricitabine, and 8% had resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs); 3% had intermediate-level resistance to second-generation INSTIs. In a multivariate model, self-report of ever having been on antiretroviral therapy (ART) was associated with resistance (P = 0.005). One of six recently infected individuals had drug resistance. Phylogenetic analysis identified five clusters of study sequences; two clusters had shared resistance mutations.

CONCLUSION

High prevalence of drug resistance was observed among MSM. Some had multiclass resistance, resistance to drugs used for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and INSTI resistance. These findings highlight the need for improved HIV care in this high-risk population, identification of alternative regimens for PrEP, and inclusion of integrase resistance testing when selecting ART regimens for MSM in the United States.

E157Q integrase strand-transfer inhibitor substitution in patients with acute/recent HIV infection

OBJECTIVES

Integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens are the preferred combinations for naïve HIV-infected individuals. Polymorphic substitutions that reduce InSTIs activity have been described, with E157Q being one of the most frequently found. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of E157Q substitution in newly diagnosed acute/recent HIV cases and the presence of transmission clusters.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study in patients with acute/recent HIV infection.

METHODS

Genotypic drug resistance tests were performed in all consecutive patients prospectively enrolled with a documented infection of less than 6 months from May 2015 to May 2017. Sequences were obtained by ultra-deep sequencing. Phylogenetic inferences were performed using maximum likelihood trees constructed with Mega 6.06. Bootstrap values of 75% or greater were defined for cluster assignment. Follow-up was, at least, 1 year.

RESULTS

In six out of 67 consecutive patients (8.95%, 95% confidence interval 4.17-18.19) with acute/recent HIV infection, strains carrying the E157Q InSTI substitution were detected. All cases were MSM patients infected with subtype B strains. No other resistance substitutions were detected in these cases. Median viral load was 5.33 (interquartile range: 4.54-5.71) log10 copies/ml and, in all cases, the mutational viral load was high (>95%). Three cases were included in transmission clusters. Three cases responded to dolutegravir-based regimens; nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens were used for the other case(s).

CONCLUSION

E157Q substitution, reducing raltegravir and elvitegravir activity, was frequently found in acute/recent HIV cases. All cases were infected with subtype B, and some were included in clusters. Cases treated with dolutegravir-based regimens had good virological response.

Absence of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Associated Resistance in Antiretroviral Therapy Naïve and Experienced Individuals from Western India

The Indian national AIDS control program heavily relies on low cost nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). With global increase in resistance to these, alternative antiretroviral combinations need to be explored. Owing to higher potency, better efficacy and tolerability, recently WHO recommended integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) based first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). There is lack of INSTI resistance surveillance data from India. Thus, there is a need to analyze integrase (IN) gene from primarily HIV-1 subtype C infected Indian population, before widespread introduction of INSTI in first-line ART. Plasma samples were collected from INSTI naïve individuals reporting to ART centre of Pune, India. RNA was extracted and IN gene was amplified by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using prior published primers. PCR product of 867 bp was bi-directionally sequenced and resistance associated mutation were analyzed using Stanford University HIV drug resistance algorithm. A total of 58 HIV-1 sequences from 62 INSTI naïve individuals were successfully genotyped. Of these 58, 40 were ART naïve, newly diagnosed and remaining individuals were on NRTI, NNRTI, or protease inhibitors based failing regimen. The commonest subtype identified in the study was C (93%) followed by A1 (3.5%). A total of 191 (66.31%) fully conserved amino acid (aa) positions were observed in IN gene. Overall there was absence of major INSTI resistance mutation, however, E157Q (13.79%) emerged as common polymorphic mutation. Other accessory mutations were L74IM (34.48%), Q95K (1.72%), and T97A (1.72%). To conclude, this first Indian study on primarily HIV-1 subtype C sequences characterized aa variations in IN gene and indicated absence of major INSTI resistance associated mutations.