1
|
Jebari K, Sandberg A. Ecocentrism and Biosphere Life Extension. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2022; 28:46. [PMID: 36287253 PMCID: PMC9605921 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-022-00404-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The biosphere represents the global sum of all ecosystems. According to a prominent view in environmental ethics, ecocentrism, these ecosystems matter for their own sake, and not only because they contribute to human ends. As such, some ecocentrists are critical of the modern industrial civilization, and a few even argue that an irreversible collapse of the modern industrial civilization would be a good thing. However, taking a longer view and considering the eventual destruction of the biosphere by astronomical processes, we argue that humans, a species with considerable technological know-how and industrial capacity could intervene to extend the lifespan of Earth's biosphere, perhaps by several billion years. We argue that human civilization, despite its flaws and harmful impacts on many ecosystems, is the biosphere's best hope of avoiding premature destruction. We argue that proponents of ecocentrism, even those who wholly disregard anthropocentric values, have a strong moral reason preserve the modern industrial civilization, for as long as needed to ensure biosphere survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Jebari
- Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Sandberg
- Future of Humanity Institute Oxford Martin School Reuben College University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The search for extraterrestrial life, recently fueled by the discovery of exoplanets, requires defined biosignatures. Current biomarkers include those of extremophilic organisms, typically archaea. Yet these cellular organisms are highly complex, which makes it unlikely that similar life forms evolved on other planets. Earlier forms of life on Earth may serve as better models for extraterrestrial life. On modern Earth, the simplest and most abundant biological entities are viroids and viruses that exert many properties of life, such as the abilities to replicate and undergo Darwinian evolution. Viroids have virus-like features, and are related to ribozymes, consisting solely of non-coding RNA, and may serve as more universal models for early life than do cellular life forms. Among the various proposed concepts, such as “proteins-first” or “metabolism-first”, we think that “viruses-first” can be specified to “viroids-first” as the most likely scenario for the emergence of life on Earth, and possibly elsewhere. With this article we intend to inspire the integration of virus research and the biosignatures of viroids and viruses into the search for extraterrestrial life.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schwieterman EW, Kiang NY, Parenteau MN, Harman CE, DasSarma S, Fisher TM, Arney GN, Hartnett HE, Reinhard CT, Olson SL, Meadows VS, Cockell CS, Walker SI, Grenfell JL, Hegde S, Rugheimer S, Hu R, Lyons TW. Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life. ASTROBIOLOGY 2018; 18:663-708. [PMID: 29727196 PMCID: PMC6016574 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet possibilities, we have compiled a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures, including gaseous, surface, and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features that are well known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for determining the minimum biomass required to maintain short-lived biogenic gases as atmospheric signatures. We focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et al. The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignature strategies, a goal left to companion articles in this series, but to review the current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate areas, and clear the way for a path forward. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Habitability markers-Photosynthesis-Planetary surfaces-Atmospheres-Spectroscopy-Cryptic biospheres-False positives. Astrobiology 18, 663-708.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W. Schwieterman
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nancy Y. Kiang
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
| | - Mary N. Parenteau
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Ames Research Center, Exobiology Branch, Mountain View, California
| | - Chester E. Harman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
- Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Shiladitya DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University System of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theresa M. Fisher
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Giada N. Arney
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Hilairy E. Hartnett
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Christopher T. Reinhard
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stephanie L. Olson
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| | - Victoria S. Meadows
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles S. Cockell
- University of Edinburgh School of Physics and Astronomy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- UK Centre for Astrobiology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sara I. Walker
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - John Lee Grenfell
- Institut für Planetenforschung (PF), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Siddharth Hegde
- Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Sarah Rugheimer
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Renyu Hu
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Timothy W. Lyons
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bains W, Seager S, Zsom A. Photosynthesis in hydrogen-dominated atmospheres. Life (Basel) 2014; 4:716-44. [PMID: 25411926 PMCID: PMC4284464 DOI: 10.3390/life4040716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2014] [Revised: 10/11/2014] [Accepted: 10/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The diversity of extrasolar planets discovered in the last decade shows that we should not be constrained to look for life in environments similar to early or present-day Earth. Super-Earth exoplanets are being discovered with increasing frequency, and some will be able to retain a stable, hydrogen-dominated atmosphere. We explore the possibilities for photosynthesis on a rocky planet with a thin H2-dominated atmosphere. If a rocky, H2-dominated planet harbors life, then that life is likely to convert atmospheric carbon into methane. Outgassing may also build an atmosphere in which methane is the principal carbon species. We describe the possible chemical routes for photosynthesis starting from methane and show that less energy and lower energy photons could drive CH4-based photosynthesis as compared with CO2-based photosynthesis. We find that a by-product biosignature gas is likely to be H2, which is not distinct from the hydrogen already present in the environment. Ammonia is a potential biosignature gas of hydrogenic photosynthesis that is unlikely to be generated abiologically. We suggest that the evolution of methane-based photosynthesis is at least as likely as the evolution of anoxygenic photosynthesis on Earth and may support the evolution of complex life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Bains
- Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| | - Sara Seager
- Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| | - Andras Zsom
- Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The search for extrasolar planets has already detected rocky planets and several planetary candidates with minimum masses that are consistent with rocky planets in the habitable zone of their host stars. A low-resolution spectrum in the form of a color-color diagram of an exoplanet is likely to be one of the first post-detection quantities to be measured for the case of direct detection. In this paper, we explore potentially detectable surface features on rocky exoplanets and their connection to, and importance as, a habitat for extremophiles, as known on Earth. Extremophiles provide us with the minimum known envelope of environmental limits for life on our planet. The color of a planet reveals information on its properties, especially for surface features of rocky planets with clear atmospheres. We use filter photometry in the visible as a first step in the characterization of rocky exoplanets to prioritize targets for follow-up spectroscopy. Many surface environments on Earth have characteristic albedos and occupy a different color space in the visible waveband (0.4-0.9 μm) that can be distinguished remotely. These detectable surface features can be linked to the extreme niches that support extremophiles on Earth and provide a link between geomicrobiology and observational astronomy. This paper explores how filter photometry can serve as a first step in characterizing Earth-like exoplanets for an aerobic as well as an anaerobic atmosphere, thereby prioritizing targets to search for atmospheric biosignatures.
Collapse
|