Comparison of Types of Breast Milk Fortification at Discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Breast Milk Feeding Rates and Growth at 4 Months Corrected Age

Growth at 2 years corrected age in preterm infants discharged on two different breast milk enhancements: An observational study

OBJECTIVE

Breast milk (BM) enhancement is often used to meet the nutritional needs of preterm infants after hospital discharge to achieve optimal growth. This study compared growth at 18-28 months corrected age (CA) among very preterm (VP) and very low birth weight (VLBW) infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on two BM enhancements.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review study of infants born between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017, with gestational age < 32 weeks or birthweight < 1500 g, discharged from the NICU on BM enhancements; fortification of BM with infant formula additives (BM-F) or unfortified BM supplemented with bottle feeds of infant formula (BM-S). BM enhancements were nonrandomized and determined by the medical team. A linear mixed model regression analysis with propensity score matching was used to estimate the adjusted associations between the nutrition plan at discharge and growth outcomes at 18-28 months CA follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one VLBW/VP infants were included. Compared with BM-S, infants discharged on BM-F were more likely to continue receiving BM at 8-12 months CA, and had lower head circumference, weight-for-length z scores, and higher incidence of moderate malnutrition (p ≤ 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, discharge on BM-F was associated with a lower incidence of overweight/obesity at 18-28 months CA (odds interval: 0.45; confidence interval: 0.21-0.96; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggests that VLBW/VP infants discharged on BM-F received BM longer, had lower growth parameter and were less likely to be overweight/obese at 18-28 months CA. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of postdischarge nutrition on preterm born children's growth, metabolic disease, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Comparison of the Effect of Direct Breastfeeding, Expressed Human Milk, and Infant Formula Feeding on Infant Weight Trajectories: A Systematic Review

Background: Formula and breastfeeding are known factors associated with infant weight trajectories. Evidence exploring the effect of expressed human milk feeding on infant weight in the community setting has not been well synthesized. Objectives: This systematic review examined (1) weight changes among infants fed expressed human milk and (2) differences in weight change between infants fed expressed human milk and infants fed at the breast or infant formula via bottle. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of each study was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: A total of six studies met the eligibility criteria and included a total of 5,152 infants. The within-subject analysis identified only 31 infants strictly or predominantly fed expressed human milk. The between-subject analysis comparing expressed human milk feeding to the available comparison groups (formula-fed or direct at the breastfed) revealed that higher weight gains were observed in the weight trajectories among infants in the bottle or formula-fed conditions in four of the six included studies. Conclusions: Findings from the few studies included in this review found a difference in the infant weight gain patterns among expressed human milk-fed infants when compared with their respective feeding groups (directly breastfed or formula-fed). Further research is needed to corroborate these findings and elucidate the clinical significance of the differences in weight gain patterns observed across infant feeding groups.

Human Milk Fortifier After Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge Improves Human Milk Usage Rates for Preterm Infants

BACKGROUND

A common neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge feeding strategy for preterm infants with growth failure who are fed exclusively expressed human milk (EHM) has been to enrich mother's own milk with formula powder or supplement 2-3 feeds per day with formula. However, this strategy displaces human milk from the diet. Our NICU recently adopted the standard practice of adding commercial human milk fortifier (HMF) to human milk feedings after discharge.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare breastfeeding rates and growth using the aforementioned 2 strategies.

METHODS

Preterm infants (<34 wk of gestation at birth) exclusively feeding EHM fortified with HMF at 2 weeks before discharge were included in this retrospective study. The HMF group (n = 92) continued fortifying with HMF at home, whereas the historical comparison group (n = 35) received our previous guidance to enrich or supplement using postdischarge formula.

RESULTS

Rates of human milk exclusivity after discharge decreased significantly less in the HMF group than those in the historical comparison group (to 83% compared with 39% at the first outpatient visit and 27% compared with 6%, respectively, at the second outpatient visit). Rates of any EHM feedings were also significantly higher in the HMF group. Fenton z-scores for weight, length, and head circumference were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing EHM fortification with HMF after NICU discharge, rather than enriching or supplementing with postdischarge infant formula, increases rates of feeding EHM for ≥3 mo but does not affect growth.

State of the evidence from clinical trials on human milk fortification for preterm infants

Infants born preterm or low birth weight are at risk for morbidity, mortality and later neuroimpairment. Appropriate early post-natal growth is associated with better outcomes in-hospital and post-discharge. Therefore, nutritional strategies that support growth may improve the long-term health of this population. Mother's milk with donor milk as a supplement are preferred sources of nutrition for these infants but may not always support growth, especially amongst infants born of very low birth weight (<1500 g) and or those with a major morbidity. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials to date demonstrate that multi-nutrient fortification of human milk improves in-hospital growth of preterm infants although data on long-term neurodevelopment are lacking. Further, individualised approaches to fortification based on milk analysis or the infant's metabolic response may improve growth over standard fortification. The evidence is insufficient to inform the timing of introducing fortifier, routine fortification of feeds post-discharge or routine use of fortifiers made from human instead of bovine milk. Importantly, there is insufficient data to determine if these fortification practices improve relevant clinical or neurodevelopmental outcomes. In sum, there is an urgent need for well-designed clinical trials to assess potential benefits and risks of fortification practices and at what cost.