Extravazation of therapeutic yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan (zevalin): a case report

Extravasation of enfortumab vedotin: a case report and literature review on antibody-drug conjugates

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) indicated for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We describe a case of EV extravasation in a patient with metastatic bladder cancer. The extravasation area appeared swollen without clinical evidence of acute severe toxicity. Guided by the presence of monomethyl-auristatin E (MMAE) component in EV's structure, prompt management of extravasation includes the administration of a subcutaneous injection of the enzyme hyaluronidase, along with the application of warm compresses and elevation of the affected limb. Due to EV vesicant properties, special precautions should be taken in cases of extravasation. Based on the positive outcomes observed, immediate infiltration of hyaluronidase, application of a warm compress, and limb elevation are recommended. Timely recognition of extravasation and prompt initiation of treatment help to minimise the occurrence of severe complications for patients. Further comprehensive guidelines with clear instructions for managing ADC extravasation are necessary for optimal patient care.

Extravasation of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, in a patient with anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate, consisting of a CD30-directed antibody, conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent auristatin E (MMAE). Although the safety datasheet of BV does not warn of severe toxic effects of extravasation, we report a third case of a patient with anaplastic large cell lymphoma who developed severe epidermal necrosis after extravasation. The reason for what happened could be attributed to the fact that MMAE belongs to the group of vinca alkaloids so it should be handled like other tissue-necrotising chemotherapeutics. Reporting of all cases of extravasation involving new conjugated chemotherapeutic drugs is of the utmost importance to be able to develop updated guidelines. Hospital pharmacists can provide information on how to manage extravasation, assess the potential risk, and have a crucial role in drafting hospital protocols.

Active monitoring improves radiopharmaceutical administration quality

Introduction

In 2016, our center adopted technology to routinely monitor 18F-FDG radiopharmaceutical administrations. Within six months of following basic quality improvement methodology, our technologists reduced extravasation rates from 13.3% to 2.9% (p < 0.0001). These same technologists administer other radiopharmaceuticals (without monitoring technology) for general nuclear medicine procedures in a separate facility at the clinic. Our hypothesis was that they would apply 18F-FDG lessons-learned to 99mTc-MDP administrations and that 99mTc-MDP manual injection extravasation rate would be consistent with the ongoing 18F-FDG manual injection extravasation rate (3.4%). We tested our hypothesis by following the same quality improvement methodology and added monitoring equipment to measure extravasation rates for 99mTc-MDP administrations.

Results

816 99mTc-MDP administrations were monitored during 16-month period (four 4-month periods: A, B, C, D). Period A (first four months of active monitoring) extravasation rate was not statistically different from the Measure Phase extravasation rate of the previously completed PET/CT QI Project: 12.75% compared to 13.3% (p-0.7925). Period A extravasation rate was statistically different from Period C (months 9-12) extravasation rate and Period D (months 13-16) extravasation rate: 12.75% compared to 2.94% and to 3.43% (p < 0.0001). During Period C and D technologists achieved extravasation rates comparable to the longstanding manual 18F-FDG injection extravasation rate (3.4%).

Conclusion

Our initial hypothesis, that awareness of a problem and the steps need to correct it would result in process improvement, was not accurate. While those factors are important, they are not sufficient. Our findings suggest that active monitoring and the associated display of results are critical to quality improvement efforts to reduce and sustain radiopharmaceutical extravasation rates.

The diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities of non-immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody-based cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Since their first approval 25 years ago, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become important targeted cancer therapeutics. However, dermatologic toxicities associated with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor (non-ICI) mAbs may complicate the course of cancer treatment. Data on the incidence and types of these reactions are limited.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted on dermatologic toxicities associated with different classes of non-ICI mAbs approved for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The review included prospective Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials; retrospective literature reviews; systematic reviews/meta-analyses; and case series/reports.

RESULTS

Dermatologic toxicities were associated with several types of non-ICI mAbs. Inflammatory reactions were the most common dermatologic toxicities, manifesting as maculopapular, urticarial, papulopustular/acneiform, and lichenoid/interface cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) with non-ICI mAbs. Immunobullous reactions were rare and a subset of non-ICI mAbs were associated with the development of vitiligo cAEs.

CONCLUSION

Dermatologic toxicities of non-ICI mAbs are diverse and mostly limited to inflammatory reactions. Awareness of the spectrum of the histopathologic patterns of cAE from non-ICI mAbs therapy is critical in the era of oncodermatology and oncodermatopathology.

Practical Tools for Patient-specific Characterization and Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation

ABSTRACT

Extravasation during radiopharmaceutical injection may occur with a frequency of more than 10%. In these cases, radioactivity remains within tissue and deposits unintended radiation dose. Characterization of extravasations is a necessary step in accurate dosimetry, but a lack of free and publicly available tools hampers routine standardized analysis. Our objective was to improve existing extravasation characterization and dosimetry methods and to create and validate tools to facilitate standardized practical dosimetric analysis in clinical settings. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we calculated dosimetric values for sixteen nuclear medicine isotopes: 11 C, 64 Cu, 18 F, 67 Ga, 68 Ga, 123 I, 131 I, 111 In, 177 Lu, 13 N, 15 O, 82 Rb, 153 Sm, 89 Sr, 99m Tc, and 90 Y. We validated our simulation results against five logical alternative dose assessment methods. We then created three new characterization tools: a worksheet, a spreadsheet, and a web application. We assessed each tool by recalculating extravasation dosimetry results found in the literature and used each of the tools for patient cases to show clinical practicality. Average variation between our simulation results and alternative methods was 3.1%. Recalculation of published dosimetry results indicated an average error of 7.9%. Time required to use each characterization tool ranged from 1 to 5 min, and agreement between the three tools was favorable. We improved upon existing methods by creating new tools for characterization and dosimetry of radiopharmaceutical extravasation. These free and publicly available tools will enable standardized routine clinical analysis and benefit patient care, clinical follow-up, documentation, and event reporting.

177Lu-DOTA-0-Tyr3-octreotate infusion modeling for real-time detection and characterization of extravasation during PRRT

PURPOSE

Given the recent and rapid development of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), increasing emphasis should be placed on the early identification and quantification of therapeutic radiopharmaceutical (thRPM) extravasation during intravenous administration. Herein, we provide an analytical model of 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-octreotate (Lutathera®) infusion for real-time detection and characterization of thRPM extravasation.

METHODS

For 33 Lutathera®-based PRRT procedures using the gravity infusion method, equivalent dose rates (EDRs) were monitored at the patient's arm. Models of flow dynamics for nonextravasated and extravasated infusions were elaborated and compared to experimental data through an equivalent dose rate calibration. Nonextravasated infusion was modeled by assuming constant volume dilution of 177Lu activity concentration in the vial and Poiseuille-like laminar flow through the tubing and patient vein. Extravasated infusions were modeled according to their onset times by considering elliptically shaped extravasation region with different aspect ratios.

RESULTS

Over the 33 procedures, the peak of the median EDR was reached 14 min after the start of the infusion with a value of 450 µSv h-1. On the basis of experimental measurements, 1 mSv h-1 was considered the empirical threshold for Lutathera® extravasation requiring cessation of the infusion and start again with a new route of injection. According to our model, the concentration of extravascular activity was directly related to the time of extravasation onset and its duration, a finding inherent in the gravity infusion method. This result should be considered when planning therapeutic strategy in the case of RPM extravasation because the local absorbed dose for β-emitters is closely linked to activity concentration. For selected EDR values, charts of extravasated activity, volume, and activity concentration were computed for extravasation characterization.

CONCLUSION

We proposed an analytical model of Lutathera® infusion and extravasation (gravity method) based on EDR monitoring. This approach could be useful for the early detection of thRPM extravasation and for the real-time assessment of activity concentration and volume accumulation in the extravascular medium.

Radiation Safety and Accidental Radiation Exposures in Nuclear Medicine

Medical radiation accidents and unintended events may lead to accidental or unintended medical exposure of patients and exposure of staff or the public. Most unintended exposures in nuclear medicine will lead to a small increase in risk; nevertheless, these require investigation and a clinical and dosimetric assessment. Nuclear medicine staff are exposed to radiation emitted directly by radiopharmaceuticals and by patients after administration of radiopharmaceuticals. This is particularly relevant in PET, due to the penetrating 511 keV γ-rays. Dose constraints should be set for planning the exposure of individuals. Staff body doses of 1-25 µSv/GBq are reported for PET imaging, the largest component being from the injection. The preparation and administration of radiopharmaceuticals can lead to high doses to the hands, challenging dose limits for radionuclides such as ⁹⁰Y and even ¹⁸F. The risks of contamination can be minimized by basic precautions, such as carrying out manipulations in purpose-built facilities, wearing protective clothing, especially gloves, and removing contaminated gloves or any skin contamination as quickly as possible. Airborne contamination is a potential problem when handling radioisotopes of iodine or administering radioaerosols. Manipulating radiopharmaceuticals in laminar air flow cabinets, and appropriate premises ventilation are necessary to improve safety levels. Ensuring patient safety and minimizing the risk of incidents require efficient overall quality management. Critical aspects include: the booking process, particularly if qualified medical supervision is not present; administration of radiopharmaceuticals to patients, with the risk of misadministration or extravasation; management of patients' data and images by information technology systems, considering the possibility of misalignment between patient personal data and clinical information. Prevention of possible mistakes in patient identification or in the management of patients with similar names requires particular attention. Appropriate management of pregnant or breast-feeding patients is another important aspect of radiation safety. In radiopharmacy activities, strict quality assurance should be implemented at all operational levels, in addition to adherence to national and international regulations and guidelines. This includes not only administrative aspects, like checking the request/prescription, patient's data and the details of the requested procedure, but also quantitative tests according to national/international pharmacopoeias, and measuring the dispensed activity with a calibrated activity meter prior to administration. In therapy with radionuclides, skin tissue reactions can occur following extravasation, which can result in localized doses of tens of Grays. Other relevant incidents include confusion of products for patients administered at the same time or malfunction of administration devices. Furthermore, errors in internal radiation dosimetry calculations for treatment planning may lead to under or over-treatment. According to literature, proper instructions are fundamental to keep effective dose to caregivers and family members after patient discharge below the Dose constraints. The IAEA Basic Safety Standards require measures to minimize the likelihood of any unintended or accidental medical exposures and reporting any radiation incident. The relative complexity of nuclear medicine practice presents many possibilities for errors. It is therefore important that all activities are performed according to well established procedures, and that all actions are supported by regular quality assurance/QC procedures.

The Scientific and Clinical Case for Reviewing Diagnostic Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation Long-Standing Assumptions

Background: The patient benefit from a diagnostic nuclear medicine procedure far outweighs the associated radiation risk. This benefit/risk ratio assumes a properly administered radiopharmaceutical. However, a significant diagnostic radiopharmaceutical extravasation can confound the procedure in many ways. We identified three current extravasation hypotheses espoused by medical societies, advisory committees, and hundreds of individual members of the nuclear medicine community: diagnostic extravasations do not cause harm, do not result in high absorbed dose to tissue, and require complex dosimetry methods that are not readily available in nuclear medicine centers. We tested these hypotheses against a framework of current knowledge, recent developments, and original research. We conducted a literature review, searched regulatory databases, examined five clinical cases of extravasated patients, and performed dosimetry on those extravasations to test these globally accepted hypotheses. Results: A literature review found 58 peer-reviewed documents suggesting patient harm. Adverse event/vigilance report database reviews for extravasations were conducted and revealed 38 adverse events which listed diagnostic radiopharmaceutical extravasation as a factor, despite a regulatory exemption for required reporting. In our own case material, assessment of care was evaluated for five extravasated patients who underwent repeat imaging. Findings reflected results of literature review and included mis- or non-identification of lesions, underestimation of Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) by 19-73%, classification of scans as non-diagnostic, and the need to repeat imaging with the associated additional radiation exposure, inconvenience, or delays in care. Dosimetry was performed for the same five cases of diagnostic radiopharmaceutical extravasation. Absorbed doses to 5 cm3 of tissue were between 1.1 and 8.7 Gy, and shallow dose equivalent for 10 cm2 of skin was as high as 4.2 Sv. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that significant extravasations can or have caused patient harm and can irradiate patients' tissue with doses that exceed medical event reporting limits and deterministic effect thresholds. Therefore, diagnostic radiopharmaceutical injections should be monitored, and dosimetry of extravasated tissue should be performed in certain cases where thresholds are thought to have been exceeded. Process improvement efforts should be implemented to reduce the frequency of extravasation in nuclear medicine.

Tissue dose estimation after extravasation of 177Lu-DOTATATE

Background

Extravasation of radiopharmaceuticals used for vectorized internal radiotherapy can lead to severe tissue damage (van der Pol et al., Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:1234–1243, 2017). Clinical management of these extravasations requires the preliminary estimation of the dose distribution in the extravasation area. Data are scarce regarding the dose estimation in the literature. This work presents a methodology for estimating the dose distribution after an extravasation occurred in September 2017, in the arm of a patient during a 7.4-GBq infusion of Lutathera ® (AAA).

Methods

A local quantification procedure initially developed for renal dosimetry was used. A calibration factor was determined and verified by phantom study. Extravasation volume of interest and its variation in time were determined using 4 whole body (WB) planar acquisitions performed at 2 h (T_2h), 5 h (T_5h), 20 h (T_20h), and 26 h (T_26h) after the beginning of the infusion and three SPECT/CT thoracic acquisitions at T_5h, T_20h, and T_26h. For better estimation of initial extravasation volume, 3 volumes were defined on SPECT images using a 3D activity threshold. Cumulated activities and associated absorbed doses (D₁, D₂, D₃) were calculated in the 3 volumes using the MIRD formalism.

Results

Volumes estimated using 3D threshold were V₁ = 1000 mL, V₂ =400 mL, and V₃ =180 mL. Cumulated activities were evaluated using a monoexponential fit on activities calculated on SPECT images. Estimated local absorbed doses in V₁, V₂, and V₃ were D₁ = 2.3 Gy, D₂ = 4.1 Gy, and D₃ = 6.8 Gy. Evolution in time of local activity in the extravasation area was consistent with an effective local half-life (T_eff) of 2.3 h.

Conclusions

Rapid local dose estimation was permitted thanks to knowledge of the calibration factor determined previous to accidental extravasation. Lutathera® lymphatic drainage was quick in the arm (T_eff = 2.3h). Estimated doses were in the lower range of deterministic effects and far under soft tissue necrosis threshold. Thus, no surgical rinse was proposed. The patient did not show any clinical consequence of the extravasation.

Monoclonal antibody extravasations: Two case reports and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Extravasation is a rare complication from intravenous chemotherapy administration. Literature about monoclonal antibody (MoAb) extravasations is scarce and also conflicting in how they are classified.

CASE REPORT

We reported two different cases of MoAb extravasations with cetuximab and nivolumab outcome respectively. The administration site appeared inflamed and patients did not report disturbances.Management and outcome: Both extravasations did not require specific treatment. General unspecific measures suffice to properly manage these extravasations and no sequels were observed after long follow-up. Both patients received all further courses of MoAb without any adverse events.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, we reported the first case-report of nivolumab extravasation in the literature. In addition, the cetuximab extravasation management and outcome was in accordance with previously published reports. Both MoAb may be considered as non-aggressive or neutral. We reviewed published information about MoAb extravasations. In conclusion, not all MoAb should be classified in the same category when extravasated and special precautions are warranted with conjugated MoAb and bevacizumab.

Monitoring and Handing of 89Sr Injection Site Extravasation in a Patient With Breast Cancer

Extravasation of various imaging tracers during administration was not a rare complication during nuclear medicine practice. However, the occurrence of extravasation of therapeutic radiopharmaceutical was rarely reported. Here we reported a 60-year-old woman with breast cancer and diffuse painful bone metastases who received strontium chloride (SrCl2) therapy to palliate her bone pain. Accidental subcutaneous extravasation in the injection site occurred. The extravasated Sr was absorbed rapidly by arm elevation, squeezing a stress ball, local warming, and gently massaging. Follow-up results showed the patient's bone pain significantly relieved and her right arm remained normal.

Extravasation of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC: case report and discussion

Background

In the case of extravasation of radioactive drugs used in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors, or in radionuclide therapy in general, rapid action is important to reduce or avoid complications. The literature on extravasation of drugs for radionuclide therapy is sparse. Based on the present case, we discuss handling and consequences of extravasation. Further, we demonstrate that dosimetry can aid in judging if the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors is satisfactory even after extravasation.

Case presentation

A case of extravasation of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC with a treatment strategy involving exercise and elevation of the affected arm and application of a compression bandage and heating is reported. Redistribution of the drug is verified and quantified by whole-body imaging and quantitative SPECT/CT and measurements of the dose rate at contact with the injection site. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC was redistributed to tumors and organs within 1 day. The patient did not report any discomfort during or after hospitalization, and no side effects related to extravasation were observed. Quantitative SPECT/CT scans at the subsequent treatment cycle of the same patient were analyzed for a comparison between the treatments. Dosimetry showed the treatments were similar with respect to the kidney and tumor absorbed doses. The radiation dose to the epidermal basal layer near the injection site was estimated and found to be consistent with the lack of side effects.

Conclusions

The treatment of extravasation was successful, and the redistribution of the drug can be easily verified through measurement of the dose rate at contact with the skin. From the results of dosimetry, it was assessed that no change of the treatment course was necessary to compensate for a possibly incomplete treatment as a result of the extravasation.

Focal cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma following radium-223 extravasation

Long-term sequelae due to extravasation of intravenous radioisotopes resulting in radiation injuries are rarely reported. As the use of radioactive isotopes for the treatment of osteoblastic metastases increases, information regarding the prevention, treatment, and long-term monitoring of suspected extravasation injury will become increasingly important. We present a patient with no previous history of skin cancer who developed an aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma at the site of prior radium-223 extravasation. We recommend that patients who experience extravasation of therapeutic radioisotopes be monitored by dermatologists for long-term sequelae. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma should be recognized as a rare but potential adverse event following cutaneous extravasation of radium-223 and is likely a side effect that is severely underreported.

Consequences of radiopharmaceutical extravasation and therapeutic interventions: a systematic review

Purpose

Radiopharmaceutical extravasation can potentially lead to severe soft tissue damage, but little is known about incidence, medical consequences, possible interventions, and effectiveness of these. The aims of this study are to estimate the incidence of extravasation of diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, to evaluate medical consequences, and to evaluate medical treatment applied subsequently to those incidents.

Methods

A sensitive and elaborate literature search was performed in Embase and PubMed using the keywords “misadministration”, “extravasation”, “paravascular infiltration”, combined with “tracer”, “radionuclide”, “radiopharmaceutical”, and a list of keywords referring to clinically used tracers (i.e. “Technetium-99m”, “Yttrium-90”). Reported data on radiopharmaceutical extravasation and applied interventions was extracted and summarised.

Results

Thirty-seven publications reported 3016 cases of diagnostic radiopharmaceutical extravasation, of which three cases reported symptoms after extravasation. Eight publications reported 10 cases of therapeutic tracer extravasation. The most severe symptom was ulceration. Thirty-four different intervention and prevention strategies were performed or proposed in literature.

Conclusions

Extravasation of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals is common. ^99mTc, ¹²³I, ¹⁸F, and ⁶⁸Ga labelled tracers do not require specific intervention. Extravasation of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals can give severe soft tissue lesions. Although not evidence based, surgical intervention should be considered. Furthermore, dispersive intervention, dosimetry and follow up is advised. Pharmaceutical intervention has no place yet in the immediate care of radiopharmaceutical extravasation.

Pitfalls and Limitations of SPECT, PET, and Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals

Radiopharmaceuticals are widely accepted to be a very safe class of drugs, with very few adverse reactions and unexpected biodistributions. However, problems can arise because of technical issues in manufacture or reconstitution, patient preparation, or drug administration. This review presents highlights of issues that have arisen in the newer classes of radiopharmaceuticals in the last 20 years and expands the scope of the previous report to include PET and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Variations in the "quality" of the eluate of a (99)Mo/(99m)Tc generator remain a major issue. Several of the newer (99m)Tc tracers require a heating step in preparation that can also lead to unacceptably low radiochemical purity. Radiolytic breakdown can be a problem with all classes of radiopharmaceuticals. Many of the newer radiopharmaceuticals localize by receptor- or transporter-mediated processes and thus can be affected by other drugs, making patient preparation more important than ever. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals may require coadministration of radioprotectant regimens, such as the use of lysine-arginine infusions with radiopeptide therapy. Extravasation can have serious consequences with therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Adverse reactions to newer radiopharmaceuticals remain rare, though may increase because of coadministration of agents such as contrast media. However, there is known to be underreporting of minor adverse reactions. Knowledge of the pitfalls that can occur with radiopharmaceuticals is important in the interpretation of nuclear medicine images and optimal patient care.

[Extravasation of radiopharmaceuticals: preventive measures and management recommended by SoFRa (Société Française de Radiopharmacie)]

Radiopharmaceuticals extravasation is rare but may have serious clinical issues. Because no specific recommendations are being proposed to date, the goals of our working group created within the French Society of Radiopharmacy are to determine preventive measures and to establish a pragmatic management of extravasation of these drugs. Our preventive measures are to recognize the symptoms (erythema, venous discoloration, swelling), to know the risk factors (which are related to radiopharmaceutical, patient, site of injection, injection technique) and severity (from erythema to skin necrosis, depending on the radionuclide) and how to avoid them (training and awareness of staff, choice of injection site, route of drug administration test, use of a catheter for administration of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals). Management should be immediate. It can be facilitated by a specific emergency kit. General measures recommended are the immediate cessation of injection, aspiration of fluid extravasation, delimitation of the extravasated area with an indelible pen, informing the doctor. Specific measures taking into account the radiotoxicity of the radionuclide and the type of radiopharmaceutical were also established. The patient should be informed by the doctor about the risks and how to take care of. Traceability of the incident must be ensured. A multidisciplinary reflexion is essential to manage the extravasation as early and effectively as possible.

[Update in the management of extravasations of cytocytostatic agent]

OBJECTIVE

To present current developments in the specific management of extravasations of antineoplastic agents after the extravasation.

METHOD

We conducted a search in PubMed, Medline and IDIS-Iowa to identify papers written in English or Spanish that described new specific measures for the management of extravasations. We also reviewed the references given in these papers and recent tertiary sources related to oncology or cytostatic agents. The search covered the period between 1997 and 2010.

RESULTS

There are only specific measures for the treatment of extravasations of 22 cytostatic agents. These measures are presented for each cytostatic agent, according their drug group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although currently there is no general consensus on the specific management of antineoplastic agents after extravasation, this review outlines the information collected and published so far, so that it may be of use to any national health centre where cytostatic drugs are prescribed, handled or administered.

Validating the Selection of Quality Indicators for Venipuncture Procedures Performed in a Radiation Therapy Department

PURPOSE

An extensive literature review was completed to validate the selection of quality indicators for venipuncture procedures performed in a radiation therapy department.

METHODS

A retrospective quantitative study (2007-2010) was conducted at the Tom Baker Cancer Center (TBCC) to review the data captured on a quality control log/statistical template for 900 venipuncture procedures performed in the radiation treatment program (RTP). The quality indicators for the venipuncture program had previously been identified to include the collection and monitoring of: the frequency/occurrence of adverse events, identifying the type of adverse events, and the number of attempts required to obtain venous access. There were no patient identifiers recorded on the department log/statistical template.

RESULTS

Data extracted from the TBCC RTP quality control log in 2007-2010 revealed an incidence of five extravasations events and one air embolism event. Comparison of the published adverse events and rates in the literature to the TBCC RTP venipuncture program rates show that its recorded quality control log/statistical template is targeting the appropriate categories. The literature reported, on average, rates for extravasations to be between 0.04% and 1.3% compared with the TBCC RT department's 0.56%. The occurrence of air embolism rates in the literature was reported to be between 11.7% and 23% compared with 0.11% occurrence in the TBCC RTP department. Based on the evidence reported in the literature, other quality control indicators have been incorporated into the TBCC RTP venipuncture program. The TBCC RTP expanded the venipuncture program quality control log/statistical template to collect and monitor the occurrence rates of phlebitis, hematoma/bruising, nerve, tendon and/or ligament damage, and infection.

CONCLUSION

The creation of standardized quality indicators for radiation treatment programs performing venipuncture in all health care facilities performing venipuncture would 1) be a step in maximizing patient safety and improving quality of care and 2) provide an opportunity for institutions to gauge and compare the quality of care provided using the same quality indicators for health care institutes performing venipuncture procedures. Collaboration with other facilities to identify, monitor, and report the data collected from standardized quality indicators would result in an increase of knowledge concerning the occurrence of rates of adverse events during and after venipuncture procedures performed in a radiation therapy department. Such efforts can only lead to increased quality of care provided across the health care system.