GEDEFO-SEFH management of antineoplastic extravasations survey results

INTRODUCTION

Extravasation is a potentially severe complication of intravenous administration of antineoplastic drugs. The limited data makes it difficult to develop an optimal management scheme. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical practice in the extravasation management of antineoplastic agents in Spanish centers.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to oncology pharmacists using the email distribution list of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Respondents were surveyed on the standard operational protocol (SOP) of extravasation, tissue damage risk classification, and specific measures of extravasation management.

RESULTS

A total of 68 surveys were completed. A specific extravasation SOP was available in 82.4% centers. The pharmacist participates in the authorship (100%) and actively collaborates in extravasation management (76.5%). A tissue damage risk classification based on the three categories was mostly adopted (48.2%) and 73.2% applied specific criteria based on concentration and/or extravasated volume. Extravasation management was mainly performed with the application of physical measures and/or antidotes (91.2%). High variability in the choices of pharmacological and/or physical measures recommended is outstanding.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study highlight the involvement of Spanish pharmacists in extravasation management, the application of physical measures and/or pharmacological measures as the method of choice in extravasation management, as well as the existing discrepancies in tissue damage risk classification and management recommendations.

Primary care electronic medication record discrepancies in patients starting treatment at a hospital-based ambulatory care pharmacy and impact on prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of discrepancies between primary care electronic medication records (EMR) and patient reported medication (PRM) in ambulatory patients starting a hospital dispensing treatment (HDT) at a hospital-based ambulatory care pharmacy (HACPh). Our secondary aims were to analyse factors associated with the presence of discrepancies and their impact on the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with the HDT.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 230 patients starting a HDT at the HACPh. Pharmacists interviewed patients and PRM was compared with EMR. Discrepancies were classified as omissions (medication in the PRM not present in the EMR) and commissions (medication active in the EMR that the patients were not taking). Potential DDIs with the HDT were screened, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect factors associated with the presence of discrepancies.

RESULTS

We identified 221 discrepancies in 116 (50.4%) patients. Being visited by three or more medical specialties (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.37) and attending private healthcare (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.14 to 16.72) in the 12 months before the study inclusion were the factors independently associated with the presence of discrepancies. Among patients with commissions (n=91), 15.4% had a potential DDI between the HDT and one medication from the EMR that they were not taking at that moment. Among patients with omissions (n=45), 11.1% had a potential DDI between the HDT and a medication in the PRM not present in the EMR.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40% of patients had one or more medications in the EMR which they were not taking and one fifth used medications that were not listed in the EMR. EMR should not be used as the only source of information when screening for DDIs, especially in patients followed by different medical specialties or combining private and public healthcare.

Ampicillin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: a clinical narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Enterococcus faecium is a commensal microorganism that can cause infections such as bacteremia. Incidence of ampicillin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (EfARSV) bacteremia is on the rise, and the mortality rate is high. Despite much data, the most appropriate treatment remains a question.

AREAS COVERED

This article mostly reviews the relevant aspects of EfARSV bacteremia: microbiology, gastrointestinal tract colonization and invasion, antibiotic resistance, epidemiology, risk factors, mortality, and treatment, including pharmacologic components of employed agents and related clinical evidence. A literature search was conducted on PubMed on 31 July 2022, which was updated on 15 November 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

EfARSV bacteremia presents high mortality. However, it is uncertain whether mortality is attributable to or a marker of severity/comorbidities. Considering its antibiotic resistance pattern, EfARSV is considered a difficult-to-treat microorganism. Glycopeptides have been used to treat EfARSV, with linezolid and daptomycin serving as potential alternative agents. Yet, the use of daptomycin is controversial due to a higher risk of treatment failures. Clinical evidence on this issue is scarce, unfortunately, and subject to many limitations. Despite increased incidence and mortality, EfARSV bacteremia presents multiple aspects to be addressed in well-conducted studies.

Pharmacological management of antifungal agents in pulmonary aspergillosis: an updated review

INTRODUCTION

Aspergillus may cause different types of lung infections: invasive, chronic pulmonary or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Pharmacological management with antifungals poses as a challenge. Patients diagnosed with pulmonary aspergillosis are complex, as well as the problems associated with antifungal agents.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the pharmacology of antifungal agents in development and currently used to treat pulmonary aspergillosis, including the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring and safety. Recommendations to manage situations that arise in daily clinical practice are provided. A literature search of PubMed was conducted on November 15^th, 2020 and updated on March 30^th, 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent and relevant developments in the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis have taken place. Novel antifungals with new mechanisms of action that extend antifungal spectrum and improve pharmacokinetic-related aspects, drug-drug interactions and safety are under current study. For those antifungals already marketed, new data related to pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dose adjustments in special situations, therapeutic drug monitoring and safety are available. To maximize efficacy and reduce the risk of associated toxicities, it is essential to choose the most appropriate antifungal; optimize its dose, interval, route of administration and length of treatment; and prevent side effects.

Classification of antineoplastic drug-induced tissue damage: a Consensus of the Spanish Oncology Pharmacy Group

OBJECTIVE

To reach at an expert consensus, using the Delphi method, for classifying the tissue-damaging potential of antineoplastic drugs, in  order to facilitate the decision-making process in the event of  extravasations.

METHOD

The panel of expert evaluators was made up of seven  pharmacists belonging to the working group on extravasations. Other  member served as coordinator. The likelihood of tissue damage was  reviewed on the basis of eight reference documents. Four categories of  drugs were established: vesicant (V); high risk irritant (HRI); low risk  irritant (LRI) and non-irritant (NI). Two rounds of surveys were performed. The drugs with an agreement of less than 70% after the two rounds were  discussed non-anonymously by the group. For each of the rounds the  following was analysed: median of the degree of consensus and the  interquartile range (IQR25-75), degree of agreement by tissue damage  category, and percentage of antineoplastics reaching a degree of  consensus of over 85% and of 100%. Drugs whose classification differed in the various reference documents were assessed separately. SPSS v23.0  statistical software was used.

RESULTS

Seventy-one antineoplastics were evaluated. In the first round, the median for degree of consensus was 100.0% (IQR25-75: 71.4- 100.0%). In the second round, the median was 100.0% (IQR25-75: 85.7- 100.0%). The percentage of antineoplastics with a consensus of 85.7% or  above increased from 66.7% to 85.9% in the second round. For the 30  antineoplastics whose values differed in the reference documents, the  degree of agreement increased from 71.4% (IQR25-75: 57.1-87.7%) to  100.0% (IQR25-75: 85.7-100.0%) in the second round. The percentage of antineoplastics with a consensus of 85.7% or above increased from 40.0%  to 76.7%. Four antineoplastics had a degree of agreement of less  than 70.0%. The final classification of drugs per category, was: 17  vesicants; 15 HRI; 13 LRI; and 26 NI. The final degree of consensus was  85.7% or above for 90.1% of antineoplastics, and 100.0% for 74.6% of  the same.

CONCLUSIONS

In this area of scarce evidence and high variability, the Delphi method allows for consensus in classifying tissue damage risk,  thus making it easier to reach clinical decisions. In approximately 90% of  the antineoplastics, the degree of consensus reached by the expert panel  was 85% or above. In 74% of the antineoplastics, it was 100%. This  provides solid ground for management decisions.

Effectiveness and safety of a novel dexamethasone mouthwash formulation in managing stomatitis in cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To present a new dexamethasone mouthwash formulation and  analyze its effectiveness and safety among patients receiving stomatitis-producing antineoplastic agents.

METHOD

Prospective observational study conducted in a university hospital between March 2017 and November 2019. Consecutive patients starting everolimus were enrolled. Patients were instructed to rinse dexamethasone mouthwash formulation twice daily until discontinuation of everolimus. A second cohort of patients with existing stomatitis induced by  high probability of producing stomatitis chemotherapy therapies was also  recruited to assess treatment effectiveness. Effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone mouthwash formulation was assessed.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone mouthwash formulation was prescribed in nine patients as prophylaxis. Six patients were diagnosed with breast cancer, two with neuroendocrine tumor and one with renal cell carcinoma. Four patients developed mild stomatitis (grade 1-2) and three patients  discontinued everolimus due to other treatment-related adverse events. In  addition, dexamethasone mouthwash formulation was prescribed as treatment in five patients with existing stomatitis. All patients achieved a significant reduction in the severity of stomatitis after starting the  dexamethasone mouthwash formulation. In both cohorts, dexamethasone  mouthwash formulation was well tolerated and neither dose reduction nor  discontinuation related to stomatitis was required.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone mouthwash formulation could be considered as a  suitable alternative for stomatitis management.

Monoclonal antibody extravasations: Two case reports and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Extravasation is a rare complication from intravenous chemotherapy administration. Literature about monoclonal antibody (MoAb) extravasations is scarce and also conflicting in how they are classified.

CASE REPORT

We reported two different cases of MoAb extravasations with cetuximab and nivolumab outcome respectively. The administration site appeared inflamed and patients did not report disturbances.Management and outcome: Both extravasations did not require specific treatment. General unspecific measures suffice to properly manage these extravasations and no sequels were observed after long follow-up. Both patients received all further courses of MoAb without any adverse events.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, we reported the first case-report of nivolumab extravasation in the literature. In addition, the cetuximab extravasation management and outcome was in accordance with previously published reports. Both MoAb may be considered as non-aggressive or neutral. We reviewed published information about MoAb extravasations. In conclusion, not all MoAb should be classified in the same category when extravasated and special precautions are warranted with conjugated MoAb and bevacizumab.

Breast cancer, placing drug interactions in the spotlight: is polypharmacy the cause of everything?

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is the most prevalent and lethal cancer among women. Forty-one percent of cases occur in people ≥ 70 years, hindering their treatment given its comorbidities and polypharmacy (PP). Potential drug-drug interactions (PDDI) were analyzed in elderly breast cancer patients between daily and oncospecific treatments and their associations with Age, BMI, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Frailty categorization, PP, and adverse effects.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A cohort of 77 patients ≥ 70 years with breast cancer who underwent a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) were included. Clinical characteristics were collected using medical records. PDDI between treatments were analyzed using two databases. Data were assessed using linear regression, Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Finally, a multivariate logistic regression model was built and tested to predict adverse effects.

RESULTS

From 719 PDDI, 530 (74%) were moderate (r² = 0.72) and the median number of drugs during oncospecific treatment (r² = 0.73) was 9 (range 3-26). Overall, 59 patients (77%) had adverse effects associated with Frailty categorization and MNA (p < 0.05). The distribution of major, moderate, minor, and total PDDI was associated with PP at CGA and during oncospecific treatment (p < 0.05). Moreover, it was verified that Frailty categorization protects from adverse effects given the intervention made at CGA.

CONCLUSIONS

CGA should be applied in oncologic elderly patients to assess clinical outcomes and categorize them according to their frailty but also to analyze PDDI. Furthermore, we encourage the use of the model in clinical practice for predicting the occurrence of adverse effects, improving therapeutic conciliation.

Breast cancer, placing drug interactions in the spotlight: Is polypharmacy the cause of everything?

e24027

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent and lethal cancer among women. Forty one percent of cases occur in people ≥ 65 years. Decision on cancer treatment is particularly challenging among this group of age given its comorbidities and polypharmacy (PP). The main objectives are the analysis of potential drug-drug interactions (PDDI) in elderly breast cancer patients between daily medications and oncospecific therapy and their probable associations with age, BMI, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), frailty and PP and the adverse effects during oncospecific treatment. Methods: A cohort of 77 patients ≥ 70 years with breast cancer underwent a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) by a Geriatrist at a university hospital. Baseline characteristics of the patients, demographical data, cancer stage, and oncospecific and daily treatments, as well as the complications and derived adverse effects were retrospectively collected using electronic medical records. Moreover, frailty categorization, daily medication number, comorbidities, Lawton and Barthel Index, malnutrition, MNA, BMI were prospectively collected using CGA report. PDDI between daily and oncospecific treatments were analyzed. Results: The median age of patients was 85 years (range 72-95). The median number of daily medications at CGA was 6 drugs (range 0-22) and most of the patients had PP at CGA and during oncospecific treatment (73% and 91%, respectively). Out of 719 PDDI, 530 (74%) were moderate ( r2= 0.72) and the median number of drugs during oncospecific treatment ( r2= 0.73) was 9 (range 3-26). Overall, by using Kruskal Wallis, 59 patients (77%) had any adverse effects statistically associated with frailty categorization and MNA ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a tendency with oncospecific treatment, BMI and age ( p = 0.098, 0.089 and 0.062, respectively). The distribution of major, moderate and minor as well as total PDDI was statistically associated with PP at CGA and during oncospecific treatment ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: CGA should be applied in oncology elderly patients not only to assess clinical outcomes and categorize them in each frailty group but also to analyze PDDI by using specific web databases, thereby improving PP, PDDI and economic costs.

Linezolid vs glycopeptides in the treatment of glycopeptide-susceptible Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: A propensity score matched comparative study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia is increasing. Vancomycin remains the first-line treatment in areas with a high prevalence of glycopeptide-susceptible isolates, but data comparing its clinical outcomes with other treatments are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides for the treatment of glycopeptide-susceptible E. faecium bloodstream infection (GSEF-BSI).

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2006 to May 2018 at the Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, and compared the clinical outcomes and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides in adult patients with GSEF-BSI. The main outcomes included clinical cure at the end of therapy, 30-day mortality, microbiological eradication and attributable length of stay (LOS). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential confounders among groups.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients with GSEF-BSI were included (linezolid, n=38; glycopeptides, n=67). After propensity score matched analysis, 56 (53.3%) patients, 28 in each cohort, entered the final analysis. No differences were observed in any of the main clinical outcomes among patients treated with linezolid or glycopeptides: clinical cure [16/28 (57.1%) vs 13/28 (46.4%), P=0.593], 30-day mortality [8/28 (28.6%) vs 12/28 (42.9%), P=0.403], microbiological eradication [22/28 (78.6%) vs 20/28 (71.4%), P=0.758] and median attributable LOS (18.0 vs 17.0 days, P=0.924). Adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid and glycopeptides showed similar clinical effectiveness and safety in the treatment of GSEF-BSI. Linezolid could be an alternative to glycopeptides in the treatment of GSEF-BSI.

Enterococcal bloodstream infection. Design and validation of a mortality prediction rule

BACKGROUND

To develop a prediction rule to describe the risk of death as a result of enterococcal bloodstream infection.

METHODS

A prediction rule was developed by analysing data collected from 122 patients diagnosed with enterococcal BSI admitted to the Clínica Universidad de Navarra (Pamplona, Spain); and validated by confirming its accuracy with the data of an external population (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona).

RESULTS

According to this model, independent significant predictors for the risk of death were being diabetic, have received appropriate treatment, severe prognosis of the underlying diseases, have renal failure, received solid organ transplant, malignancy, source of the bloodstream infection and be immunosuppressed. The prediction rule showed a very good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, P = 0.93) and discrimination for both training and testing sets (area under ROC curve = 0.84 and 0.83 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive rule was able to predict risk of death as a result of enterococcal bloodstream infection as well as to identify patients, who being below the threshold value, will have a low risk of death with a negative predictive value of 96%.

[Influence of ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of amikacin]

OBJECTIVE

Despite the increasing ethnic diversity, there are few studies of its influence on the pharmacokinetics of amikacin. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in different populations: Asian, Hispanic, North Africans and Caucasian.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital during eight years. It was included all patients with intravenous amikacin treatment in extended interval dosing regimen with therapeutic drug monitoring of amikacin. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed. A bivariate and multiple linear regression statistical analysis were carried out.

RESULTS

164 patients were included: 7 asians, 135 Caucasians, 11 Hispanics and 11 from North Africa. It was shown a lower plasma concentrations of amikacin in North Africa population due to its greater clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Amikacin plasma concentrations monitoring is advisable in patients from North Africa in order to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations.

Treatment of anthracycline extravasations using dexrazoxane

Extravasation of cytotoxic agents is a true medical emergency. Dexrazoxane is the only licensed drug for the treatment of anthracycline extravasations. Dexrazoxane proved to be effective and moderately well tolerated. However, alternative approaches for the management of anthracycline extravasations are available such as topical DMSO and cooling. There appears to be general agreement about dexrazoxane usefulness when extravasations involve large volumes of anthracycline and/or central venous access device. Nevertheless, the non-invasive combination of DMSO and cooling is the most commonly described therapy, particularly in small anthracycline extravasations. Further research is still needed to establish unequivocal situations where dexrazoxane must be initiated.

[Update in the management of extravasations of cytocytostatic agent]

OBJECTIVE

To present current developments in the specific management of extravasations of antineoplastic agents after the extravasation.

METHOD

We conducted a search in PubMed, Medline and IDIS-Iowa to identify papers written in English or Spanish that described new specific measures for the management of extravasations. We also reviewed the references given in these papers and recent tertiary sources related to oncology or cytostatic agents. The search covered the period between 1997 and 2010.

RESULTS

There are only specific measures for the treatment of extravasations of 22 cytostatic agents. These measures are presented for each cytostatic agent, according their drug group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although currently there is no general consensus on the specific management of antineoplastic agents after extravasation, this review outlines the information collected and published so far, so that it may be of use to any national health centre where cytostatic drugs are prescribed, handled or administered.

Factors associated with adherence to guidelines for the use of tigecycline in a tertiary care hospital

We assessed the adherence to the prescribing hospital protocol for tigecycline and factors associated with noncompliance. A total of 103 patients were included in the study. In 23 (22.3%) patients, tigecycline was not administered according to the protocol, mostly because of the availability of other therapeutic alternatives and prescription for indications that were not included in the guidelines. factors independently associated with nonadherence to the protocol were community-acquired infection (OR, 14.01; 95% CI, 1.54-127.12; P=0.019), and empirical tigecycline treatment (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 0.88-55.40; P=0.066). penicillin allergy (OR, 0.004; 95% CI, 0.000-0.071; P=0.001) and previous antibiotic treatment (OR, 0.025; 95% CI, 0.003-0.233; P=0.001) were factors associated with adherence to the hospital protocol. A positive time trend between total number of prescriptions and non-compliant prescriptions with the protocol was observed (Spearman's rho coefficient 0.971; P=0.001). Adherence to tigecycline protocol could be improved by focusing on protocols for community-acquired infections, mainly skin and soft tissue infections.

[Differences in the use of tigecycline between ICU patients and non-ICU patients]

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline is a new broad spectrum antibiotic that is predominantly used for the treatment of severe infections both in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU and in non-ICU patients with less severe clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in the use of tigecycline between ICU patients and non-ICU patients treated with this antibiotics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective, cohort, observational study in which cases were defined as patients who received one or more doses of tigecycline over the first 18 months after approval of the drug in a general hospital. Clinical characteristics, indications, route of administration, clinical response, tolerability and outcome were recorded in the groups of ICU and non-ICU patients. Descriptive data and results of the comparison of both cohorts are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 103 were included in the study, 34(33%) of which received tigecycline during their stay in the ICU. ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients had a higher SAPS II score on admission (39.0 +/- 11.8 vs 26.3 +/- 8.0, p < 0.001) and at the time of starting tigecycline treatment (42.2 +/- 12.6 vs 25.6 +/- 8.2, p < 0.001), were treated with antibiotics for more days (21.4 +/- 30.6 vs 13.6 +/- 30.5 days, p < 0.012) and received a greater number of antibiotic agents concomitantly (85.3% vs 47.8%,p < 0.001), presented a higher selection of emerging bacterial flora (41.2% vs 15.9%, p =0.005), particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.6%vs 2.9%, p =0.006), higher rate of clinical failure (58.8%vs 21.7%, p < 0.001), longer hospitalization (51.2 +/- 39.4 vs 28.7 +/- 26.3 days, p < 0.001) and higher overall mortality rate (50% vs 14.5%, p < 0.001) and infection-attributed mortality (20.6% vs 7.2%, p =0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

The patient that receives tigecycline in the ICU has a higher severity level and worse clinical outcome than the non-ICU patient treated with this antibiotic. It is necessary to optimize the indications of tigecycline in the ICU to improve the clinical results.