1
|
Castellane TCL, Fernandes CC, Pinheiro DG, Lemos MVF, Varani AM. Exploratory comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals potential gene targets associated with Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 resistance in fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). Funct Integr Genomics 2024; 24:129. [PMID: 39039331 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-024-01408-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Genetically modified (GM) crops, expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal toxins, have substantially transformed agriculture. Despite rapid adoption, their environmental and economic benefits face scrutiny due to unsustainable agricultural practices and the emergence of resistant pests like Spodoptera frugiperda, known as the fall armyworm (FAW). FAW's adaptation to Bt technology in corn and cotton compromises the long-term efficacy of Bt crops. To advance the understanding of the genetic foundations of resistance mechanisms, we conducted an exploratory comparative transcriptomic analysis of two divergent FAW populations. One population exhibited practical resistance to the Bt insecticidal proteins Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2, expressed in the genetically engineered MON-89Ø34 - 3 maize, while the other population remained susceptible to these proteins. Differential expression analysis supported that Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 significantly affect the FAW physiology. A total of 247 and 254 differentially expressed genes were identified in the Cry-resistant and susceptible populations, respectively. By integrating our findings with established literature and databases, we underscored 53 gene targets potentially involved in FAW's resistance to Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2. In particular, we considered and discussed the potential roles of the differentially expressed genes encoding ABC transporters, G protein-coupled receptors, the P450 enzymatic system, and other Bt-related detoxification genes. Based on these findings, we emphasize the importance of exploratory transcriptomic analyses to uncover potential gene targets involved with Bt insecticidal proteins resistance, and to support the advantages of GM crops in the face of emerging challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tereza Cristina L Castellane
- Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rod. Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane km 5, Jaboticabal, CEP 14884-900, SP, Brasil.
| | - Camila C Fernandes
- Instituto de Pesquisa em Bioenergia, Laboratório Multiusuário de Sequenciamento em Larga Escala e Expressão Gênica, IPBEN, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil
| | - Daniel G Pinheiro
- Departamento de Biotecnologia Agropecuária e Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rod. Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane km 5, Jaboticabal, CEP 14884-900, SP, Brasil
| | - Manoel Victor Franco Lemos
- Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rod. Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane km 5, Jaboticabal, CEP 14884-900, SP, Brasil
- Instituto de Pesquisa em Bioenergia, Laboratório Multiusuário de Sequenciamento em Larga Escala e Expressão Gênica, IPBEN, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil
| | - Alessandro M Varani
- Departamento de Biotecnologia Agropecuária e Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rod. Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane km 5, Jaboticabal, CEP 14884-900, SP, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang R, Liu F, Lan Y, Wang J, Wang L, Li J, Liu X, Fan Z, Guo T, Yue B. Transcriptomics and metagenomics of common cutworm (Spodoptera litura) and fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) demonstrate differences in detoxification and development. BMC Genomics 2022; 23:388. [PMID: 35596140 PMCID: PMC9123734 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08613-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spodoptera litura is an important polyphagous pest that causes significant damage to the agricultural sector. We performed RNA-seq of 15 S. litura individuals from larval (fifth and sixth instar larvae), chrysalis, and adult developmental stages. We also compared the S. litura transcriptome data with Spodoptera frugiperda across the same developmental stages, which was sequenced in our previous study. RESULTS A total of 101,885 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) were identified in S. litura. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses indicated that S. litura may undergo active xenobiotic and detoxifying metabolism during its larval and adult stages, which may explain difficulties with current population control measures. We also found that DETs of single-copy orthologous genes between S. litura and S. frugiperda were involved in basic metabolism and development. However, energy and metabolic processes genes had a higher expression in S. litura, whereas nervous and olfactory function genes had a higher expression in S. frugiperda. Metagenomics analysis in larval S. litura and S. frugiperda revealed that microbiota participate in the detoxification and metabolism processes, but the relative abundance of detoxification-related microbiota was more abundant in S. frugiperda. Transcriptome results also confirmed the detoxification-related pathway of S. frugiperda was more abundant than in S. litura. CONCLUSIONS Significant changes at transcriptional level were identified during the different development stages of S. litura. Importantly, we also identified detoxification associated genes and gut microbiota between S. litura and S. frugiperda at different developmental stages, which will be valuable in revealing possible mechanisms of detoxification and development in these two lepidopterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruixiang Tang
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China
| | - Fangyuan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China
| | - Yue Lan
- Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology On Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China
| | - Jiao Wang
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing Li
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China
| | - Xu Liu
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, 610066, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhenxin Fan
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China
| | - Tao Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Bisong Yue
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Zhou H, Lai Y, Chen Q, Yu XQ, Wang X. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Influences Metabolic Homeostasis in Spodoptera frugiperda. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:727434. [PMID: 34659154 PMCID: PMC8514726 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.727434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Insect gut microbiota plays important roles in acquiring nutrition, preventing pathogens infection, modulating immune responses, and communicating with environment. Gut microbiota can be affected by external factors such as foods and antibiotics. Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is an important destructive pest of grain crops worldwide. The function of gut microbiota in S. frugiperda remains to be investigated. In this study, we fed S. frugiperda larvae with artificial diet with antibiotic mixture (penicillin, gentamicin, rifampicin, and streptomycin) to perturb gut microbiota, and then examined the effect of gut microbiota dysbiosis on S. frugiperda gene expression by RNA sequencing. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria were the most dominant phyla in S. frugiperda. We found that the composition and diversity of gut bacterial community were changed in S. frugiperda after antibiotics treatment. Firmicutes was decreased, and abundance of Enterococcus and Weissella genera was dramatically reduced. Transcriptome analysis showed that 1,394 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) were found between the control and antibiotics-treated group. The Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) results showed that antibiotics-induced dysbiosis affected many biological processes, such as energy production, metabolism, and the autophagy–lysosome signal pathway. Our results indicated that dysbiosis of gut microbiota by antibiotics exposure affects energy and metabolic homeostasis in S. frugiperda, which help better understand the role of gut microbiota in insects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaqing Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanchan Zhou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yushan Lai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Qiang Yu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyun Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|