Transmesocolic Pyeloplasty: Experience of a Single Center

Prospective randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric and adolescent patients

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TMP) and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in pediatric and adolescent patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2006 to May 2012, data of pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty were recorded in a prospective manner. Data included age, pelvic volume, presence of stones, aberrant vessels, operative time, analgesics requirement and time to accept oral feeds and drain removal. Patients with left side pelviureteric junction obstruction with any size of pelvic volume, with or without renal stones and aberrant vessels were included in the study. Patients were assigned into two groups by simple randomization technique. A total of 38 TMP and 41 left sided RLP were performed. Median follow-up period for transmesocolic group was 12.5 months (9.5-62 months) and 14 months (8-66 months) for retro colic group. Outcome for this study was adequate drainage on renal scan, improvement in symptom and or resolution of hydronephrosis on ultrasound. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 8.73 years in RLP and 7.73 years in TMP. In RLP group the mean operative time was 75.84 min (time from port insertion to pyeloplasty) and 135.4 min (total operative time) while it was 44.82 min and 104.82 min respectively in TMP group. Compared with classic RLP, TMP cases showed a significant reduction in operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

The transmesocolic approach for left sided pyeloplasty enables a shorter operative time even in the presence of large pelvis, aberrant vessel and stones without increasing morbidity in comparison to RLP approach.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To present our long-term results with the Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty, performed by a single surgeon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between August 1999 and December 2009, 79 patients (80 procedures) were operated for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We use the Anderson-Hynes technique by a transperitoneal approach. Patients were evaluated with Ultrasound, Excretory urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy (Mag-3). The perioperative characteristics, complications and results were reviewed.

RESULTS

We performed 80 laparoscopic pyeloplasties in 79 patients. Mean operative time was 93.2 minutes (60-180). Crossing vessels were found in 38 of 82 (46.3%) renal units. Kidney abnormalities occurred in 4 patients (1 double ureteropelvic system, one associated retrocaval ureter, 1 horseshoe kidney and one pelvic kidney). Complications occurred in 5 procedures (6.5%): an immediately postoperative bleeding (Clavien 3b), 1 cecal volvulus (Clavien 3b), 1 urosepsis (Clavien 4th) and 1 urinary fistula (Clavien 3a). In this series there was neither mortality nor conversion to open surgery There was recurrence in 3 out of 80 patients (3.7%). They were resolved as follows: 1 percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy, 1 secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 1 robotic pyeloplasty. There was a 96.3%. of primary overall success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that laparoscopic pyeloplasty compares favorably with the result achieved by open surgery. We believe that laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a good surgical alternative for the management of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Over the last two decades, minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) have been developed and popularized.

OBJECTIVE

To critically analyze the current status of laparoscopic and robotic repair of UPJO.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review was performed in November 2012 using PubMed. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Multiple series of laparoscopic pyeloplasty have demonstrated high success rates and low perioperative morbidity in pediatric and adult populations, with both the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. Data on pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty are increasingly becoming available. A larger number of cases have also been reported for adult patients, confirming that robotic pyeloplasty represents a viable option for either primary or secondary repair. Robot-assisted redo pyeloplasty has been mostly described in the pediatric population. Different technical variations have been implemented with the aim of tailoring the procedure to each specific case. The type of stenting, retrograde versus antegrade, continues to be debated. Internal-external stenting as well as a stentless approach have been used, especially in the pediatric population. Comparative studies demonstrate similar success and complication rates between minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty in both the adult and pediatric setting. A clear advantage in terms of hospital stay for minimally invasive over open pyeloplasty was observed only in the adult population.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy represents an efficient and effective less invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty. Robotic pyeloplasty is likely to emerge as the new minimally invasive standard of care whenever robotic technology is available because its precise suturing and shorter learning curve represent unique attractive features. For both laparoscopy and robotics, the technique can be tailored to the specific case according to intraoperative findings and personal surgical experience.

Pure transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery for renal cyst decortication: report of initial five cases

OBJECTIVE

To present our initial experience with pure transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery renal cyst decortication.

METHODS

From December 2010 to July 2011, five female patients with symptomatic renal cyst in the anterior portion and lower pole of the kidney were submitted to pure transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery renal cyst decortication in our center. Under general anesthesia, the patients were placed in the lithotomy position with the affected side elevated by 60°. A 3-cm incision was made at the posterior vaginal fornix and a modified three-channel port was deployed across the vaginal incision. The cyst was dissected and the cyst fluid was aspirated using a suction device. The cyst wall was circumferentially excised.

RESULTS

All five procedures were successfully carried out without additional transabdominal trocars. The median operative time was 80 min (range 60-90 min). The median estimated blood loss was 25 mL (range 25-50 mL). The median visual analog scale score was 1 on postoperative day 1. None of the patients required narcotic pain medications beyond postoperative day 2. Intestinal function recovered on postoperative day 1-3. There was no intraoperative or postoperative complication in any of the patients. During the follow-up visits, all the patients were in good condition. All the patients reported unaltered sexual function after surgery by the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience suggests that pure transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery renal cyst decortication is feasible and safe in selected patients.

Transmesocolic approach for left side laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison with laterocolic approach in the initial learning period

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of transmesocolic (TMC) laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with conventional laterocolic procedure for surgeons with limited experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We started laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 2009. Since then, 21 patients of left side disease have undergone this surgery in our institution. To access the left ureteropelvic junction, we used the conventional laterocolic approach in 9 patients, while the transmesocolic approach was used in the remaining 12 patients, and perioperative results and follow-up data were then compared.

RESULTS

The mean operative time using the transmesocolic approach was significantly shorter than the conventional laterocolic approach (242 vs. 308 min, p=0.022). Furthermore, there was no complication or open conversion. Postoperative pain was significantly decreased in the TMC group (2.8 vs. 4.0 points, measured using the visual analogue scale on the first postoperative day, p=0.009). Postoperative complications were encountered in two patients. All patients were symptom-free after 1 year of follow-up, and radiologic success rates for each group were 92 and 89%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Direct exposure of the ureteropelvic junction via the mesocolon saves time during the colon mobilization procedure. The approach is safe and feasible even for surgeons with limited experience, and has success rates similar to those of the conventional laterocolic approach.

Transmesenteric approach for left transperitoneal renal surgery: technique and experience

INTRODUCTION

In the last few years laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of several urological diseases such as renal cancer and ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). A transmesenteric approach for left laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been recently described in order to avoid bowel manipulation and the potentially related complications. The aim of the present study is to describe the surgical technique and the advantages of the transmesenteric approach for laparoscopic pyeloplasty, pyelolithotomy, and simple nephrectomy in our experience.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From December 2007 to May 2010, 12 laparoscopic procedures for left renal diseases were performed using a transmesenteric approach. The indications were left UPJO in 9 cases, left pelvic-ureteral stones in 2 cases, and left end-stage kidney disease in one case.

RESULTS

No conversions or intraoperative complications were observed. No blood transfusions were required. Resumption of oral intake and canalization occurred in all cases within 48 hours of the procedure. All patients had an uneventful postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic transmesenteric approach represents an interesting and advantageous technical improvement of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of left renal diseases.

Percutaneous ureteral catheterization in laparoscopic surgery: value of nephroscopy needle trocar

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience with use of the nephroscopy needle trocar for percutaneous catheterization. In multiple urologic procedures, surgeons use ureteral catheters to decrease morbidity, increase the success rate, and allow for postoperative radiographic follow-up. The advent of laparoscopic surgery has logically required catheterization to be adapted to our laparoscopic procedures.

METHODS

The expansion of our daily practice to include multiple laparoscopic procedures showed us the difficulties inherent to ureteral catheterization in laparoscopic surgery. During our experience of >1000 laparoscopic procedures, we have used more or less complex catheterization techniques. After developing the use of the nephroscopy needle trocar for laparoscopic urinary diversion and finding that such use simplified the procedure, this technique was extended to all other laparoscopic procedures in which catheterization is required.

RESULTS

We analyzed the use of the nephroscopy needle trocar in 15 ureteropyeloplasty, 21 ileal conduit, and 4 laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation procedures. The mean operating time required for anterograde catheterization in ureteropelvic junction stenosis was 3 minutes, 35 seconds, and the mean operating time for retrograde catheterization was 2 minutes, 20 seconds. Anterograde catheterization was impossible in 1 case. No cases of a false ureteral tract occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our analysis have shown that the use of the nephroscopy needle trocar for percutaneous catheterization in laparoscopic surgery markedly simplifies the procedure, with the resultant savings in operating time.