Evaluation of the Impact of Ureteroscope, Access Sheath, and Irrigation System Selection on Intrarenal Pressures in a Porcine Kidney Model

Serial manual bolus irrigation leads to critical intrarenal pressures during flexible ureterorenoscopy - time to abandon this manoeuvre

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the effect of solitary and serial manual bolus irrigations on intrarenal pressures (IRPs) and observe the clinical consequences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pressure guidewire was used for IRP measurement during routine flexible ureterorenoscopy for management of renal stone disease, including manual bolus irrigation when required to maintain vision. The fluid bolus was either as a solitary manual bolus or a series of manual boluses in quick succession. The pre-bolus, maximal and difference between IRPs were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 50 procedures in 46 patients were analysed. In all, 68 solitary manual boluses and 38 serial manual boluses were observed to have been undertaken during these procedures. After a solitary manual bolus, the median (standard deviation [SD], range) increase in IRP was 22.4 (34.0, 0.1-160.8) mmHg, and the mean (SD, range) maximum IRP was 46.1 (41.7, 15.8-190.0) mmHg, with elevated IRPs persisting for a median (range) duration of 19 (4-66) s. After serial manual boluses, the median (SD, range) rise in IRP was 58.4 (64.7, 10.2-242.84) mmHg and the mean (SD, range) maximum IRP reached was 100.8 (69.7, 34.3-303.5) mmHg. The elevated IRPs endured for a median (range) of 42 (9-121 s; P < 0.01 in all comparisons), suggesting a much greater elevation of IRP with instances where serial bolus irrigation was undertaken.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual bolus irrigation, both solitary but particularly serial boluses, produces significant rises in IRP and could logically result in pyelovenous backflow and sepsis. We suggest that this manoeuvre should be avoided to reduce complications during ureterorenoscopy.

Impact of ureteral access sheath size on intrarenal pressure evaluated by LithoVue™ elite single use ureteroscope

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the impact of ureteral access sheath (UAS) size on intrarenal pressure (IRP) using LithoVue™ Elite (LVE) ureteroscope (Boston Scientific) during lithotripsy and to identify factors contributing to increased IRP.

METHODS

A single-arm prospective study was conducted on 21 consecutive patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy using the LVE at a single center between April 2023 and April 2024. 11/13 Fr or 13/15 Fr UAS was placed in all cases based on the physician's discretion. We analyzed baseline, median, and maximum IRPs and factors associated with increased IRP (≥ 30 mmHg).

RESULTS

Median age was 61 (IQR: 48-66) years. Baseline, median, and maximum IRPs were 11 (IQR: 5-16), 32 (IQR: 18-67), and 159 (IQR: 111-222) mmHg, respectively. 11/13Fr and 13/15Fr UAS were utilized in 10 and 11 patients, respectively, with no significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups. The baseline, median, and maximum IRPs were significantly lower in the 13/15Fr UAS group: 5 vs. 18.5 mmHg (p = 0.001), 21 vs. 57 mmHg (p = 0.02), and 111 vs 177.5 mmHg (p = 0.01). The use of 11/13 UAS was the factor associated with an increased median IRP (≥ 30 mmHg). Sex, comorbidities, the presence of hydronephrosis, stone location, the shape of the renal pelvis, and laser size were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement and monitoring of IRPs using LVE during lithotripsy are technically feasible. Our study confirmed that the use of larger UAS can decrease IRP. Further investigation is needed to clarify the clinical impact of IRP during URS.

Renal pelvis pressure and flowrate with a multi-channel ureteroscope: invoking the concept of outflow resistance

Understanding renal pelvis pressure (PRP) during ureteroscopy (URS) has become increasingly important. High irrigation rates, desirable to maintain visualization and limit thermal dose, can increase PRP. Use of a multi-channel ureteroscope (m-ureteroscope) with a dedicated drainage channel is one strategy that may facilitate simultaneous low PRP and high flowrate. We sought to define the relationship between PRP and flowrate across a range of different outflow resistance scenarios with an m-ureteroscope versus a single-channel ureteroscope (s-ureteroscope). The m- or s-ureteroscope was placed into the pelvis of a validated silicone kidney-ureter model. Trials were conducted at irrigation pressures (50-150 cmH20) and five different outflow resistance scenarios simulated with catheters of different lengths and diameters. PRP was measured with a fiber optic pressure sensor positioned in the renal pelvis. Flowrate was determined by measuring the mass of drainage fluid over 60 s. PRP was lower with the m-ureteroscope than the s-ureteroscope when equivalent flowrates were delivered (i.e. 34 vs. 82 cmH20 respectively with 15 ml/min irrigation in a high outflow resistance scenario). Flowrate was higher with the m-ureteroscope than the s-ureteroscope when equivalent irrigation pressures were applied (i.e. 28 vs. 14 ml/min respectively with irrigation pressure 150 cmH20 in a high outflow resistance scenario). The m-ureteroscope has improved pressure-flow dynamics imparting important clinical benefits. More importantly, this approach to framing ureteroscopy in the context of pressure-flow relationships related by resistance values allows quantification of ureteroscopy within a deterministic system, which can be used to streamline future device development and technological innovation.

Optimal deflection techniques for flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS): a comparative in vitro PEARLS analysis

PURPOSE

Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) have been introduced without current evidence on how to optimize deflection. Aim was to evaluate in vitro deflection angles with 2 different FANS techniques-sheath advancement and ureteroscope deflection; and effects of sheath size-ureteroscope combinations.

METHODS

We evaluated in vitro deflection angles of 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr and 12/14Fr FANS (Hunan Reborn Medical Co. Ltd) with six single-use flexible ureteroscopes (Pusen Uscope 7.5Fr, OTU WiScope 7.5Fr, OTU WiScope 8.6Fr, Innovex EU-scope 8.7Fr, Red Pine RP-U-C12 8.7Fr and Boston Scientific Lithovue 9.5Fr). Two deflection techniques were tested: (1) sheath advancement-advancing the sheath forward over a maximally deflected ureteroscope, and (2) ureteroscope deflection-maximally deflecting the ureteroscope from various starting positions relative to tip of the sheath.

RESULTS

Intra and inter-scope comparisons of maximum deflection angles were significantly different (all ANOVA p < 0.01). Largest maximum angles for all ureteroscopes were with the sheath advancement technique (range 218°-277°), and second largest for most scopes using the ureteroscope deflection technique at tip (range 111°-212°), mostly deviating from manufacturer specifications (range 270°-275°). 10/12Fr and 11/13Fr sheath sizes were more flexible than 12/14Fr. Largest angles were with 11/13Fr sheath-OTU8.6Fr/Innovex8.7Fr combinations.

CONCLUSION

Optimal deflection with FANS is achieved using either a sheath advancement technique, or ureteroscope deflection technique at tip. Despite using these optimized techniques, deflection angles specified by manufacturers seem hardly achievable. The sheath advancement technique and 11/13Fr sheath-OTU8.6Fr/Innovex8.7Fr combinations may be better suited for lower pole situations. Urologists should be aware of these differences and apply the findings to their FANS technique.

Assessment of Intrarenal Pressure through Dilatation State of the Renal Collecting System

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to explore the relationship between the dilation states of the renal collecting system in flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) view and intrarenal pressure (IRP).

METHODS

Fifteen porcine kidneys were randomly selected and numbered 1 through 15. Pressure transducers were inserted into the renal calyx via puncture and adjusted to a zero position. The distal end of the f-URS probe was placed within the renal pelvis. Perfusion rates of 50 mL/min, 80 mL/min, and 100 mL/min were utilized. We observed the relationship between the dilation state of the renal collecting system and changes in IRP. The state of complete dilation was defined as an unchanging spatial morphology of the renal collecting system as visualized during f-URS.

RESULTS

With irrigation rates of 50 mL/min, 80 mL/min, and 100 mL/min, IRP values at the moment of complete dilation of the renal collecting system ranged from 16 to 18 cm H2O, 16-19 cm H2O, and 16-19 cm H2O, respectively. Maximum IRPs ranged from 47 to 49 cm H2O, 82-85 cm H2O, and 97-100 cm H2O, respectively. Prior to complete dilation of the renal collecting system, IRP consistently remained below 20 cm H2O. However, following full dilation of the renal collecting system, IRP rose rapidly and rapidly surpassed 20 cm H2O. Despite sustained elevations in IRP following full dilation, no significant alterations in the renal collecting system dilated morphological were observed with f-URS.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro experiments indicate that when the renal collecting system is not fully dilated, the IRP is consistently less than 20 cm H2O. Evaluation of IRP being within a safe range can be determined by assessing the dilation status of the renal collecting system.

Intrarenal pressure and flow rate profile using LithoVue™ elite: impact of different irrigation systems and working channel instruments

PURPOSE

To report real-time IRP and FR while performing flexible ureteroscopy in porcine kidney model utilizing LithoVue™ Elite (Boston Scientific®) with different irrigation systems, including automated pumps.

METHODS

Using an ex-vivo model of porcine kidney, IRPs were measured with LithoVue Elite. Ureteroscopic settings (US) were tested with all permutations of irrigation methods (IM), working channel occupant (WCO), and ureteral access sheaths (UAS). IMs included: Single Action Pumping System (SAPS™, Boston Scientific), Thermedx FluidSmart™ (Stryker®), and ENDOMAT™ (Karl Storz®). Pumps were tested at 50, 100, and 150 mmHg. WCOs included a 1.9Fr zero-tip basket, 200 µm, and 365 µm laser fibers. UASs utilized 11/13Fr and 12/14Fr 36 cm.

RESULTS

84 different US were tested (252 experiments). ENDOMAT had higher IRP but the same FR as Thermedx at the same US for 50 and 100 mmHg (p < 0.01). SAPS had higher IRP and FR than pumps in all US studies (p < 0.01). There was positive correlation between pressure set by the pump and both IRP and FR (rho > 0.9). As the diameter of the WCO increased, lower IRP and FR were observed with the pumps (p < 0.01). With SAPS, IRP was similar regardless of WCO, but FR was decreased with the increased diameter of WCO (p = 0.81 and p < 0.01, respectively). There was significantly higher IRP when using 11/13Fr UAS than 12/14Fr (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

IRP was higher with SAPS than automated pumps. ENDOMAT showed higher IRP than Thermedx when under 150 mmHg. IRP and FR increase with higher pump pressure and decrease with larger diameter WCO. Likewise, a larger UAS significantly reduced IRP.

Intrarenal pressures during flexible ureteroscopy: an insight into safer endourology

OBJECTIVES

To assess intrarenal pressures (IRPs) and complication rates after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), and to assess factors that contribute to raised IRPs and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After informed consent patients underwent fURS under general anaesthesia. The transducer of a 0.3556 mm (0.014″) pressure guidewire was placed in the renal pelvis for live recording of IRPs. The fURS procedures were performed in a routine manner under antibiotic cover with the aim of dusting the calculus to completion. The operating surgeon was blinded to the live-recorded IRPs.

RESULTS

A total of 40 fURS procedures were performed in 37 patients (26 male and 11 female). The mean age was 50.5 years. As a cohort, the mean of average IRPs was 34.8 mmHg and the mean of maximal IRPs was 128.8 mmHg. Pearson's correlation showed a significant inverse correlation between the mean IRP and age (r[38]: -0.391, P = 0.013). Three cases experienced postoperative deviations from uncomplicated recovery, with two being hypotensive and one case being both hypotensive and hypoxic. Three cases returned to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery, with two cases of flank pain and one case of urosepsis with positive urine cultures. The patient presenting with urosepsis had exhibited IRPs exceeding the mean.

CONCLUSION

The IRPs changed significantly from normal baseline levels during routine fURS. The mean IRP during fURS correlates with patient age, but not with other factors. The IRP may be related to increased complication rates at fURS. Understanding factors that influence IRP will allow urologists to better manage this intraoperatively.

In vivo ureteroscopic intrarenal pressures and clinical outcomes: a multi-institutional analysis of 120 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pressure range generated in the human renal collecting system during ureteroscopy (URS), in a large patient sample, and to investigate a relationship between intrarenal pressure (IRP) and outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective multi-institutional study was conducted, with ethics board approval; February 2022-March 2023. Recruitment was of 120 consecutive consenting adult patients undergoing semi-rigid URS and/or flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) for urolithiasis or diagnostic purposes. Retrograde, fluoroscopy-guided insertion of a 0.036-cm (0.014″) pressure guidewire (COMET™ II, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) to the renal pelvis was performed. Baseline and continuous ureteroscopic IRP was recorded, alongside relevant operative variables. A 30-day follow-up was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied to IRP traces, with mean (sd) and maximum values and variance reported. Relationships between IRP and technical variables, and IRP and clinical outcome were interrogated using the chi-square test and independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 430 pressure traces were analysed from 120 patient episodes. The mean (sd) baseline IRP was 16.45 (5.99) mmHg and the intraoperative IRP varied by technique. The mean (sd) IRP during semi-rigid URS with gravity irrigation was 34.93 (11.66) mmHg. FURS resulted in variable IRP values: from a mean (sd) of 26.78 (5.84) mmHg (gravity irrigation; 12/14-F ureteric access sheath [UAS]) to 87.27 (66.85) mmHg (200 mmHg pressurised-bag irrigation; 11/13-F UAS). The highest single pressure peak was 334.2 mmHg, during retrograde pyelography. Six patients (5%) developed postoperative urosepsis; these patients had significantly higher IRPs during FURS (mean [sd] 81.7 [49.52] mmHg) than controls (38.53 [22.6] mmHg; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A dynamic IRP profile is observed during human in vivo URS, with IRP frequently exceeding expected thresholds. A relationship appears to exist between elevated IRP and postoperative urosepsis.

Mechanism of urosepsis: relationship between intrarenal pressures and pyelovenous backflow

To document the histological changes observed in renal units subjected to elevated intrarenal pressures (IRPs) and postulate the possible mechanisms of infectious complications after ureteroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ex vivo studies were performed on porcine renal models. Each ureter was cannulated with a 10-F dual-lumen ureteric catheter. A pressure-sensing wire was inserted through one lumen and with the sensor positioned in the renal pelvis for IRP measurement. Undiluted India ink stain was irrigated through the second lumen. Each renal unit was subjected to ink irrigation at target IRPs of 5 (control), 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 200 mmHg. Three renal units were subjected to each target IRP. After irrigation, each renal unit was processed by a uropathologist. Macroscopically, the amount of renal cortex stained by ink was calculated as a percentage of the total perimeter. Microscopically, presence of ink reflux into collecting ducts or distal convoluted tubules, and pressure-related features, was noted at each IRP.

RESULTS

Signs of pressure, as represented by collecting duct dilatation, was first observed at 60 mmHg. Ink staining was consistently observed in the distal convoluted tubules at IRPs ≥60 mmHg, and all renal units above this pressure showed renal cortex involvement. At ≥90 mmHg, ink staining was observed in venous structures. At 200 mmHg, ink staining was observed in supportive tissue, venous tributaries in the sinus fat, peritubular capillaries, and glomerular capillaries.

CONCLUSION

Using an ex vivo porcine model, pyelovenous backflow occurred at IRPs of ≥90 mmHg. Pyelotubular backflow occurred when irrigation IRPs were ≥60 mmHg. These findings have implications for the development of complications after flexible intrarenal surgery.

Perceptions and Practice Patterns of Urologists Relating to Intrarenal Pressure During Ureteroscopy: Findings from a Global Cross-Sectional Analysis

Objectives: To explore beliefs and practice patterns of urologists regarding intrarenal pressure (IRP) during ureteroscopy (URS). Methods: A customized questionnaire was designed in a 4-step iterative process incorporating a systematic review of the literature and critical analysis of topics/questions by six endourologists. The 19-item questionnaire interrogated perceptions, practice patterns, and key areas of uncertainty regarding ureteroscopic IRP, and was disseminated via urologic societies, networks, and social media to the international urologic community. Consultants/attendings and trainees currently practicing urology were eligible to respond. Quantitative responses were compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test, with subgroup analysis by procedure volume. Results: Responses were received from 522 urologists, practicing in six continents. The individual question response rate was >97%. Most (83.9%, 437/515) respondents were practicing at a consultant/attending level. An endourology fellowship incorporating stone management had been completed by 59.2% (307/519). The vast majority of respondents (85.4%, 446/520) scored the perceived clinical significance of IRP during URS ≥7/10 on a Likert scale. Concern was uniformly reported, with no difference between respondents with and without a high annual case volume (p = 0.16). Potential adverse outcomes respondents associated with elevated ureteroscopic IRP were urosepsis (96.2%, 501/520), collecting system rupture (80.8%, 421/520), postoperative pain (67%, 349/520), bleeding (63.72%, 332/520), and long-term renal damage (26.1%, 136/520). Almost all participants (96.2%, 501/520) used measures aiming to reduce IRP during URS. Regarding the perceived maximum acceptable threshold for mean IRP during URS, 30 mm Hg (40 cm H2O) was most frequently selected [23.2% (119/463)], with most participants (78.2%, 341/463) choosing a value ≤40 mm Hg. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale analysis of urologists' perceptions of ureteroscopic IRP. It identifies high levels of concern among the global urologic community, with almost unanimous agreement that elevated IRP is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Equipoise remains regarding appropriate IRP limits intraoperatively and the most appropriate technical strategies to ensure adherence to these.

Intrarenal Pressure Measured Using a Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Pressure Sensing Capabilities: A Study of the Effects of Ureteral Access Sheath, Irrigation, and Working Channel Accessories

Introduction: Intrarenal pressure is emerging as an important monitoring parameter during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). We measure how intraoperative conditions affect intrarenal pressure using a novel pressure sensing ureteroscope. Methods: The LithoVue Elite (LVE) single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (Boston Scientific) is the first commercial ureteroscope that senses pressure at its tip. LVE was used in a porcine model to measure intrarenal pressure with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS) with various sizes and placement locations, irrigation methods, and working channel accessories. LVE pressure accuracy was measured in a bench model. This abstract shows the least-square means from multiway analysis of variances used for analysis. Results: Intrarenal pressures were the highest without a UAS (64 mm Hg), followed by the 11/13 UAS (51 mm Hg) and the 12/14 and 13/15, which were not statistically different (39-40 mm Hg). The pressures were highest with UASs placed at the ureteropelvic junction (61 mm Hg), and lowest if placed in the renal pelvis (24 mm Hg). Irrigation methods showed the highest pressures with syringe (57 mm Hg), while irrigation bags (pressurized at 150-300 mm Hg) produced 43 to 46 mm Hg and 25 mm Hg when applied with 80 cm of gravity. Placing a 200 μm laser fiber reduced pressures from 44 to 41 mm Hg. Finally, the bench model showed that LVE was 96% accurate up to 300 mm Hg. Conclusion: Intrarenal pressure significantly varied based on UAS sizes, placement, and irrigation methods. Accordingly, fURS with LVE is poised to be an invaluable tool for clinical decision-making and future studies of intrarenal pressure.

Retrograde intra renal surgery and safety: pressure and temperature. A systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) with laser lithotripsy represents the gold-standard to treat renal stones up to 20 mm. Controlling intraoperative parameters such as intrarenal pressure (IRP) and temperature (IRT) is mandatory to avoid complications. This article reviews advances in IRP and IRT over the last 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

We conducted a PubMed/Embase search and reviewed publications that include temperature and pressure during RIRS. Thirty-four articles have been published which met the inclusion criteria. Regarding IRP, a consensus has emerged to control IRP during RIRS, in order to avoid (barotraumatic and septic) complications. Several monitoring devices are under evaluation but none of them are clinically approved for RIRS. Ureteral access sheath, low irrigation pressure and occupied working channel help to maintain a low IRP. Robotic systems and suction devices would improve IRP intraoperative management and monitoring. IRT determinants are the irrigation flow and laser settings. Low power settings(<20 W) with minimal irrigation flow (5-10 ml/min) are sufficient to maintain low IRT and allows continuous laser activation.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence suggests that IRP and IRT are closely related. IRP depends on inflow and outflow rates. Continuous monitoring would help to avoid surgical and infectious complications. IRT depends on the laser settings and the irrigation flow.

The Role of 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Moderate Nephrolithiasis

INTRODUCTION

The aim was a retrospective analysis of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage on perioperative outcomes in patients with moderate nephrolithiasis (MN). MN was defined as a maximum of two unilateral kidney stones with a maximum stone diameter of 6-10 mm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a monocentric retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis of flexible ureteroscopies (fURS) performed for MN between 01/2014 and 12/2018.

RESULTS

A total of 402 fURS were performed in patients with urolithiasis; 112 MN cases underwent further analysis. UAS was successfully applied in 33 MN cases [33/112 (29.46%)]. UAS was inserted regardless of the maximum kidney stone diameter and the presence of multiple kidney stones (p > 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed a prolonged median operation time (UAS: 94 min, non-UAS: 74 min, p = 0.04) and median fluoroscopy time (UAS: 75 s, non-UAS: 57.5 s, p = 0.04) in the UAS cohort. These differences were not confirmed on multivariate logistic regression.UAS was not associated with better stone-free rates in either the univariate or multivariate analysis (UAS: 26/33, non-UAS: 61/79, p = 1.0) nor with the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications (UAS: 3/33, non-UAS: 9/79, p = 0.98) or median length of hospital stay (UAS: 2 days, non-UAS: 2 days, p = 0.169).

CONCLUSION

We identified no statistical benefits from the usage of 12/14F UAS for MN. As no relevant UAS-associated complications were documented, both strategies (with and without UAS) are feasible.

Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature to ascertain the upper tract pressures generated during endourology, the relevant influencing variables and clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed by two authors independently (S.C., N.D.). Studies reporting ureteric or intrarenal pressures (IRP) during semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS)/flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS)/percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)/miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL) in the period 1950-2021 were identified. Both in vitro and in vivo studies were considered for inclusion. Findings were independently screened for eligibility based on content, with disagreements resolved by author consensus. Data were assessed for bias and compiled based on predefined variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Mean IRP appeared to frequently exceed a previously proposed threshold of 40 cmH₂ O. Semi-rigid URS with low-pressure irrigation (gravity <1 m) resulted in a wide mean IRP range (lowest reported 6.9 cmH₂ O, highest mean 149.5 ± 6.2 cmH₂ O; animal models). The lowest mean observed with fURS without a ureteric access sheath (UAS) was 47.6 ± 4.1 cmH₂ O, with the maximum peak IRP being 557.4 cmH₂ O (in vivo human data). UAS placement significantly reduced IRP during fURS, but did not guarantee pressure control with hand-operated pump/syringe irrigation. Miniaturization of PCNL sheaths was associated with increased IRP; however, a wide mean human IRP range has been recorded with both mPCNL (lowest -6.8 ± 2.2 cmH₂ O [suction sheath]; highest 41.2 ± 5.3 cmH₂ O) and standard PCNL (lowest 6.5 cmH₂ O; highest 41.2 cmH₂ O). Use of continuous suction in mPCNL results in greater control of mean IRP, although short pressure peaks >40 cmH₂ O are not entirely prevented. Definitive conclusions are limited by heterogeneity in study design and results. Postoperative pain and pyrexia may be correlated with increased IRP, however, few in vivo studies correlate clinical outcome with measured IRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrarenal pressure generated during upper tract endoscopy often exceeds 40 cmH₂ O. IRP is multifactorial in origin, with contributory variables discussed. Larger prospective human in vivo studies are required to further our understanding of IRP thresholds and clinical sequelae.

Influencing factors of acute kidney injury following retrograde intrarenal surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the influencing factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

METHODS

The data of patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones between January 2018 and June 2022 at two tertiary centers were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data of patients were obtained. According to kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, those with and without AKI were divided into two groups. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative predictive factors of patients were investigated between the groups. In addition, the influencing factors of AKI were examined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 295 (35.7%) women and 532 (64.3%) men. The mean age was 50.03 ± 15.4 years (range 18-89), and mean stone size was 15.5 ± 6.1 mm (range 6-47). Overall, 672 of patients (81.3%) were stone-free after the initial treatment. According to KDIGO, 110 of patients (13.3%) had AKI during the postoperative period. Univariate analysis showed that stone size (P = .003), previous stone surgery (P = .010), renal malformations (P = .017), high operative time (P =  < .001), high preoperative creatinine value (P = .036), intraoperative complications (P = .018), and postoperative urinary tract infection (P = .003) had significant influence on the AKI after RIRS. Multivariate analysis excluded previous stone surgery, high preoperative creatinine value, renal malformations, and intraoperative complications from the logistic regression model, whereas other factors maintained their statistically significant effect on AKI, indicating that they were independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Stone size, operative time, postoperative urinary tract infection, and diabetes mellitus are significant predictors of AKI. During RIRS, urologists should consider the factors that increase the risk of AKI and evaluate the treatment outcomes based on these factors.

Paediatric kidney stone surgery: state-of-the-art review

While urolithiasis in children is rare, the global incidence is rising, and the volume of minimally invasive surgeries being performed reflects this. There have been many developments in the technology, which have supported the advancement of these interventions. However, innovation of this kind has also resulted in wide-ranging practice patterns and debate regarding how they should be best implemented. This is in addition to the extra challenges faced when treating stone disease in children where the patient population often has a higher number of comorbidities and for example, the need to avoid risk such as ionising exposure is higher. The overall result is a number of challenges and controversies surrounding many facets of paediatric stone surgery such as imaging choice, follow-up and different treatment options, for example, medical expulsive therapy, shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This article provides an overview of the current status of paediatric stone surgery and discussion on the key topics of debate.

Determinants of outflow rate through the ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy: an experimental in vivo study in an anesthetized porcine model

To evaluate the effect of different ureteroscope positions, saline pumping frequency, laser fiber diameter and ureteral access sheath (UAS) on outflow rate during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). This study was performed in an anesthetized porcine model. The fURS setup included a manual pumping system, a 9.5 Fr single used-digital flexible ureteroscope and a ureteral access sheath (UAS). Outflow was collected and measured from the UAS during 1 min in all experimental settings. The evaluated variables were the position of the ureteroscope, the pumping frequency (2 s, 3 s or 5 s), the diameter of the used UAS (12/14 Fr or 14/16 Fr) and laser fiber (200 μm or a 272 μm). Ureteroscope position in the lower calyx was associated with significantly lower outflow rate (p < 0.05). The use of the 14/16 Fr UAS resulted in improved flow in the renal pelvis and upper calyx (p < 0.05) but not in the lower calyx. The use of a 200 μm laser fiber only improved flow in the upper calyx and when a 14/16 Fr UAS was being used. Pumping frequency did not show a significant correlation with outflow rate. The ureteroscope positioning and UAS size were important determinants of outflow rate through the UAS during fURS, while laser fiber diameter had a limited effect. In the lower calyx the outflow was minimal and was not improved by using a larger UAS.

Safety enhanced surgical robot for flexible ureteroscopy based on force feedback

BACKGROUND

Although some robotic systems have been developed to improve conventional flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), a widely used intervention in urology, these robots rarely have a comprehensive force feedback function which is important for master-slave controlled surgical robots.

METHODS

Here, we design and fabricate a novel FURS robot with a comprehensive force feedback function. Moreover, to realize better force feedback, a neural network-based method is also demonstrated to estimate the interactive forces between the flexible ureteroscope and the environment.

RESULTS

We show that when teleoperating the flexible ureteroscope with our robot, the operator can accurately feel the obstruction if the interactive axial force or torque exceeds 1.2 N or 15.6 mN·m respectively. For bending movement, augmented force feedback greatly improves the accuracy of the operator's perception of obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed robotic system with force feedback is expected to improve the safety of robot-assisted FURS.

Ureteral Access Sheaths and Its Use in the Future: A Comprehensive Update Based on a Literature Review

Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are part of urologist’s armamentarium when performing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Recently, the world of RIRS has changed dramatically with the development of three game-changers: thulium fiber laser (TFL), smaller size single use digital flexible ureterosopes and intraoperative intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurement devices. We aimed to clarify the impact of UASs on IRP, complications and SFRs and put its indications in perspective of these three major technological improvements. A systematic review of the literature using the Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed by two authors and relevant studies were selected according to PRISMA guidelines. Recent studies showed that using a UAS lowers IRP and intrarenal temperature by increasing irrigation outflow during RIRS. Data on the impact of a UAS on SFRs, postoperative pain, risk of infectious complications, risk of ureteral strictures and risk of bladder recurrence of urothelial carcinoma after diagnostic RIRS were inconclusive. Prestenting for at least one week resulted in ureteral enlargement, while the influence of pre-operative administration of alpha-blockers was unclear. Since TFL, smaller single use digital ureteroscopes and devices with integrated pressure-measuring and aspiration technology seemed to increase SFRs and decrease pressure and temperature related complications, indications on the use of a UAS may decrease in the near future.

Comprehensive endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones: Literature review and expert opinions

Treatment of urolithiasis, a benign disease, requires high efficacy and safety. Endoscopic treatment of impacted ureteral stones remains a challenging procedure for urologists, despite recent remarkable advances in surgical technology in treatment of urolithiasis. The success rate of endoscopic treatment in patients with impacted stones is reported to be lower than that in patients with nonimpacted stones. Moreover, the presence of stone impaction is associated with high rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The best management for patients with impacted ureteral stones should therefore be devised based on the latest knowledge and techniques. The present review focuses on the preoperative prediction of stone impaction, the safest and most effective endoscopic surgical procedures, and the most appropriate management for postoperative ureteral strictures. We overview comprehensive endoscopic management for impacted ureteral stones based on literature review and expert opinions.

The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study

BACKGROUND

The insertion of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a frequent procedure during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) to facilitate kidney stone treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of 12/14 French (F) UAS on fURS outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of fURS procedures conducted at the Department of Urology (University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany) for kidney stone treatment via lithotripsy or basket stone retrieval between September 2013 and June 2017. Uni- and multivariate analyses were done with the help of RStudio (Version 1.0.136) software.

RESULTS

In total, 283 consecutive fURS were analyzed. UAS was applied in 98 cases (34.63%). The insertion of UAS was preferred in cases with multiple kidney stones and larger median maximal stone diameter (p < 0.05). UAS usage correlated with elevated radiation exposure in seconds (94 vs. 61; p < 0.0001), prolonged operation time in minutes (99 vs. 66, p < 0.0001), length of hospital stay over 48 h (LOS, 22.49% vs. 10.81%; p = 0.015), more frequent postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS, 13.27% vs. 4.32%; p = 0.013) and lower postoperative stone-free rates (60.20% vs. 78.92%; p = 0.0013). Moreover, we conducted uni- and multivariate subgroup analysis for cases with multiple kidney stones (≥ 2) and comparable stone burden; UAS was inserted in 48.3% of these cases (71/147). On multivariate logistic regression, UAS insertion was statistically associated with prolonged operation time in minutes (101 vs. 77; p = 0.004). No statistical differences regarding radiation exposure, stone-free rates, postoperative SIRS rates or LOS were noted between UAS and non-UAS patients with multiple kidney stones of similar size (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

12/14F UAS does not seem to improve overall outcomes in fURS for kidney stones. In patients with multiple kidney stones it may be associated with elevated operation time without a clear benefit in terms of improved stone-free status or reduced perioperative complication rate. Further prospective randomized studies to specify the indications for UAS usage are urgently needed.

Role of Intrarenal Pressure in Modern Day Endourology (Mini-PCNL and Flexible URS): a Systematic Review of Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the latest evidence about intrarenal pressures (IRPs) generated during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and present tools and techniques to maintain decreased values.

RECENT FINDING

fURS and PCNL constitute the primary means of stone treatment. New flexible ureterorenoscopes with small diameter and miniaturized PCNL instruments achieve optimal stone-free rates (SFRs) while decreasing invasiveness and morbidity. Nevertheless, endourologists must remain cognizant regarding the dangers of increased IRPs to avoid complications. Current research presents essential information for urologists regarding this topic. During fURS, using a ureteral access sheath (UAS), we avoid extremely high IRPs with all irrigation types. During mPCNL, pressure remains low, mainly using the purging effect or a vacuum-assisted sheath. Devices of intraoperative IRP measurement and intelligent pressure control have proven their feasibility, accuracy and efficacy. These will have an increasing role to play in the future management of stone disease.