1
|
Kim HJ, Hong SK. Rise in intraluminal temperature during ureteroscopy: Is this a concern? Investig Clin Urol 2025; 66:1-10. [PMID: 39791579 PMCID: PMC11729224 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20240369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2024] [Revised: 12/12/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
Abstract
The global increase in urolithiasis prevalence has led to a shift towards minimally invasive procedures, such as retrograde intrarenal surgery, supported by advancements in laser technologies for lithotripsy. Pulsed lasers, particularly the holmium YAG and the newer thulium fiber laser, have significantly transformed the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, the use of high-power lasers in these procedures introduces risks of heat-related injury. Laser lithotripsy works through photothermal and photomechanical effects to fragment stones, but up to 96% of the laser energy is converted into heat, increasing the risk of thermal damage to the surrounding urothelial mucosa. Studies show that even at low-power settings, intrarenal temperatures can exceed the threshold for cellular injury, particularly in confined spaces like the ureter. This narrative review explores strategies to mitigate thermal injury, including optimizing laser settings, improving irrigation flow rates, and incorporating novel methods such as cold irrigation, controlling outflow resistance, and using suction. Understanding these approaches is crucial to enhancing patient safety during high-power laser lithotripsy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Joon Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Candela L, Trevisani F, Ventimiglia E, D'Arma A, Corsini C, Robesti D, Traxer O, Montorsi F, Salonia A, Villa L. Acknowledging acute kidney disease following ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: results from a tertiary care referral center. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:3905-3911. [PMID: 39008224 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a recently described syndrome consisting of kidney function abnormalities lasting less than 3 months. Little is known regarding AKD following ureteroscopy (URS) and laser lithotripsy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the occurrence and evolution of AKD in stone patients treated with URS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 284 patients treated with URS for urinary stones were retrospectively analyzed. According to the KDIGO 2020 criteria, AKD was defined as postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease ≥ 35%, or serum creatinine (SCr) increase ≥ 50%. AKI was defined as SCr increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 50%. AKD evolution was evaluated 60 days post-URS. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression analyses tested the association of patients' characteristics and perioperative data with the occurrence of AKD. RESULTS Overall, postoperative AKD occurred in 32 (11.3%) patients. Recovery from AKD was found in 26 (82%) patients and persistent AKD occurred in 6 (18%) patients. At UVA, age at surgery (p = 0.05), baseline SCr (p = 0.02), baseline CKD category (p = 0.006), Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.01), operative time (p = 0.04) and postoperative complications (< 0.001) were associated with AKD. At MVA, CKD category (OR 2.99, 95% CI = 1.4-6.3; p = 0.004), operative time (OR 1.01, 95% CI = 1.001-1.018; p = 0.023) and postoperative complications (OR 3.5, 95% CI = 1.46-8.49; p = 0.005) were independent predictors of AKD. CONCLUSIONS AKD is a frequent complication in patients treated with URS. Moreover, AKD persists in a non-neglectable percentage of patients at medium-term follow-up. Therefore, nephrological assessment should be considered, especially in high-risk patients. Current findings should be considered for the peri-operative management of stone patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Candela
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- GRC No 20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique Sur La Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Eugenio Ventimiglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia D'Arma
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Christian Corsini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Traxer
- GRC No 20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique Sur La Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Villa
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, URI-Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang J, Li Z, Lai C, Xu K. An In Vivo Assessment of a Novel Temperature Control Flexible Ureteroscope System for Monitoring and Controlling Intrarenal Temperature During Flexible Ureteroscopy. Urology 2024; 191:38-44. [PMID: 39002847 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of a novel temperature control flexible ureteroscope system in the precise monitoring and control of intrarenal temperature (IRT) during ureteroscopy. METHODS We developed a novel temperature control flexible ureteroscope system (PT-Scope), including a temperature-monitoring ureteroscope and a irrigation-suction platform for temperature regulation. A porcine thermometry model was established to observe temperature changes under varying holmium laser powers (10, 20, 30 W) and irrigation rates (0, 20, 50 mL/min), utilizing percutaneous nephrostomy thermometry and PT-Scope measurements, with subsequent evaluation of temperature variations at different distances from the laser fiber tip. A porcine kidney stone model was established while porcine was randomly assigned to two groups: In the temperature control group, PT-Scope was connected to the irrigation-suction platform with temperature regulation, while in the nontemperature control group without temperature regulation. Comparative analysis was performed to evaluate differences in IRT between the two groups. RESULTS Across various laser powers and irrigation rates, the temperature measurement capability of the PT-Scope was precise, demonstrating consistency with percutaneous nephrostomy temperature measurements. The temperature obtained from the PT-Scope reflect the temperature approximately 0.05 cm away from the fiber tip, whereas temperatures close to fiber tip were significantly higher. The peak temperature of the temperature control group vs nontemperature control group were 31.70 ± 2.609°C and 44.37 ± 3.318 °C, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean temperature of the temperature control group vs nontemperature control group was 27.40 ± 2.107 °C vs 35.9 ± 1.921 °C (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION PT-Scope has demonstrated the capability to precisely monitor and control IRT within a safe threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianghua Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhuohang Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Cong Lai
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kewei Xu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farkouh A, Park K, Buell MI, Mack N, De Guzman C, Clark T, Baldwin EA, Shete K, Leu R, Amasyali AS, Seibly E, Cheng KW, Song S, Okhunov Z, Baldwin DD. Prone vs supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does position affect renal pelvic pressures? Urolithiasis 2024; 52:66. [PMID: 38630256 PMCID: PMC11023995 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01555-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to measure and compare renal pelvic pressure (RPP) between prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a benchtop model. Six identical silicone kidney models were placed into anatomically correct prone or supine torsos constructed from patient CT scans in the corresponding positions. A 30-Fr renal access sheath was placed in either the upper, middle, or lower pole calyx for both prone and supine positions. Two 9-mm BegoStones were placed in the respective calyx and RPPs were measured at baseline, irrigating with a rigid nephroscope, and irrigating with a flexible nephroscope. Five trials were conducted for each access in both prone and supine positions. The average baseline RPP in the prone position was significantly higher than the supine position (9.1 vs 2.7 mmHg; p < 0.001). Similarly, the average RPP in prone was significantly higher than supine when using both the rigid and flexible nephroscopes. When comparing RPPs for upper, middle, and lower pole access sites, there was no significant difference in pressures in either prone or supine positions (p > 0.05 for all). Overall, when combining all pressures at baseline and with irrigation, with all access sites and types of scopes, the mean RPP was significantly higher in the prone position compared to the supine position (14.0 vs 3.2 mmHg; p < 0.001). RPPs were significantly higher in the prone position compared to the supine position in all conditions tested. These differences in RPPs between prone and supine PCNL could in part explain the different clinical outcomes, including postoperative fever and stone-free rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala'a Farkouh
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Kyu Park
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Matthew I Buell
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Nicole Mack
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Cliff De Guzman
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Toby Clark
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Baldwin
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Kanha Shete
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Rose Leu
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Akin S Amasyali
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Evan Seibly
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Kai Wen Cheng
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Sikai Song
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - Zhamshid Okhunov
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA
| | - D Duane Baldwin
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Room A560, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Faure A, Paye Jaouen A, Demede D, Juricic M, Arnaud A, Garcia C, Charbonnier M, Abbo O, Botto N, Blanc T, Leclair MD, Loubersac T. Safety and feasability of ureteroscopy for pediatric stone, in children under 5 Years (SFUPA 5): A French multicentric study. J Pediatr Urol 2024; 20:225.e1-225.e8. [PMID: 38030430 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ureteroscopy (URS) can be proposed as first-line therapy for the management of pelvic stones from 10 to 20 mm and for lower ureteric stones in children. However, little is known about the success and the morbidity of URS in young children. Ureteroscopic treatment may present matters in young children because of the small size of the pediatric kidney and the small size of the collecting system. OBJECTIVE To assess safety and efficacy of URS for the treatment of urinary stones in children aged of 5 years or less. STUDY DESIGN After the institutional ethical board approval was obtained, we conducted a retrospective, analytic, multicentric study that included all URS performed between January 2016 and April 2022 in children aged of 5 years or less. In this non-comparative case series, anonymized pooled data were collected from 7 tertiary care centers of pediatric patients. Endpoints were the one-session SFR at 3 months and per and postoperatives complications. Descriptive statistics were applied to describe the cohort. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were included. For them, 96 procedures were performed at the median age of 3.5 years (IQR: 0.8-5) and median weight of 14 Kg (6.3-23). Median stone size was 13 mm (4-45). There were 65 (67 %) renal stones treated with flexible URS, most of which were in the renal pelvis (30 %) and in the lower calix (33 %). A ureteral access sheath was used in 91 % procedures. Preoperative ureteral stent was placed in 52 (54 %) of patients. None of patients had ureteral dilatation. The single-session SFR was 67.4 % (56.3 and 89.2 % for flexible URS and semi-rigid URS respectively) and children require 1.4 procedures to achieve complete stone clearance. The overall complication rate was 18.7 %, most of them were minor (Clavien I-II). Intraoperative perirenal extravasation (Clavien IIIb) due to forniceal rupture was documented in 6.2 % of cases, related to an increased intrapelvic pressure (IPP) performed in a closed pelvicalyceal system. DISCUSSION Pediatric urologists should be aware of forniceal rupture based on the presence of extravasation of contrast during endourological procedures especially when they have difficulties to reach lower caliceal stone in small patient. CONCLUSION URS in patients aged of 5 years or less, is a complex minimally invasive procedure with reasonable efficacy and low morbidity. Intrarenal stones treated by RIRS in young children carries the risk of additional procedures to complete stone clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Faure
- APHM, Aix Marseille University, Timone Enfants, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marseille, France.
| | - A Paye Jaouen
- APHP, Robert-Debré University Hospital, National Reference Center for Rare Urinary Tract Diseases "MARVU", Pediatric Urology, Paris, France
| | - D Demede
- University Hospital of Lyon, Pediatric Urology, Lyon, France
| | - M Juricic
- University Hospital of Rennes, Pediatric Urology, Rennes, France
| | - A Arnaud
- University Hospital of Rennes, Pediatric Urology, Rennes, France
| | - C Garcia
- University Hospital of Toulouse, Pediatric Urology, Toulouse, France
| | - M Charbonnier
- APHM, Aix Marseille University, Timone Enfants, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marseille, France
| | - O Abbo
- University Hospital of Toulouse, Pediatric Urology, Toulouse, France
| | - N Botto
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - T Blanc
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M D Leclair
- Nantes Université, Pediatric Urology, Nantes, France
| | - T Loubersac
- Nantes Université, Pediatric Urology, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu W, Yang J, Wan W, Amier Y, Li X, Zhang J, Hu X, Liu W, Wang P, Li J, Wang S, Yu X. A Novel Hydrodynamic Design Greatly Improves the Debris Clearance Rate of Flexible Ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2024; 38:276-282. [PMID: 38149596 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To introduce a novel hydrodynamic design for a flexible ureteroscope that can increase stone debris clearance. Methods: Based on hydrodynamics, the new design allowed the ureteroscope to have six water jets. Fluid gushed from the six jets and would ultimately converge into an eddy. The safety and stone debris clearance efficiency were tested in a 3D-printed kidney model. Stone fragments between 0.5 and 1 mm were used to mimic the debris. A ureteroscope already approved for marketing was used as a control. Results: The new design did not change the local renal pressure and did not raise the whole renal pressure under irrigation at 80 or 100 mL/min but slightly raised it under irrigation at 120 mL/min. The pressures in the 2 g stone clearance procedures were 26.0, 33.1, and 37.5 cmH2O for the new design and 25.1, 30.2, and 39.3 cmH2O for the current design; in the 4 g stone clearance procedures, the pressures were 30.1, 37.2, and 40.0 cmH2O for the new design and 26.9, 30.8, and 39.8 cmH2O for the current design, all under conditions of 80, 100, and 120 mL/min irrigation, respectively. The new design significantly improved the stone clearance rate by ∼10-fold. It effectively cleared 2 and 4 g stones within 900 seconds under the three irrigation rates. In contrast, the current design cleared <10% of the stone debris in all tests. Conclusion: The new hydrodynamic design significantly improved the stone debris clearance rate without causing obviously increased renal pressure, and the improvement was maintained under different irrigation pressures and stone burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weisong Wu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Junyi Yang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wenlong Wan
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yirixiatijiang Amier
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xianmiao Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiaqiao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuecheng Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinping Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Yu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Croghan SM, Somani BK, Considine SW, Breen KJ, McGuire BB, Manecksha RP, Gauhar V, Hameed BMZ, O'Meara S, Emiliani E, Autrán Gomez AM, Agarwal D, Şener E, O'Brien FJ, Streeper NM, Seitz C, Davis NF. Perceptions and Practice Patterns of Urologists Relating to Intrarenal Pressure During Ureteroscopy: Findings from a Global Cross-Sectional Analysis. J Endourol 2023; 37:1191-1199. [PMID: 37725588 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To explore beliefs and practice patterns of urologists regarding intrarenal pressure (IRP) during ureteroscopy (URS). Methods: A customized questionnaire was designed in a 4-step iterative process incorporating a systematic review of the literature and critical analysis of topics/questions by six endourologists. The 19-item questionnaire interrogated perceptions, practice patterns, and key areas of uncertainty regarding ureteroscopic IRP, and was disseminated via urologic societies, networks, and social media to the international urologic community. Consultants/attendings and trainees currently practicing urology were eligible to respond. Quantitative responses were compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test, with subgroup analysis by procedure volume. Results: Responses were received from 522 urologists, practicing in six continents. The individual question response rate was >97%. Most (83.9%, 437/515) respondents were practicing at a consultant/attending level. An endourology fellowship incorporating stone management had been completed by 59.2% (307/519). The vast majority of respondents (85.4%, 446/520) scored the perceived clinical significance of IRP during URS ≥7/10 on a Likert scale. Concern was uniformly reported, with no difference between respondents with and without a high annual case volume (p = 0.16). Potential adverse outcomes respondents associated with elevated ureteroscopic IRP were urosepsis (96.2%, 501/520), collecting system rupture (80.8%, 421/520), postoperative pain (67%, 349/520), bleeding (63.72%, 332/520), and long-term renal damage (26.1%, 136/520). Almost all participants (96.2%, 501/520) used measures aiming to reduce IRP during URS. Regarding the perceived maximum acceptable threshold for mean IRP during URS, 30 mm Hg (40 cm H2O) was most frequently selected [23.2% (119/463)], with most participants (78.2%, 341/463) choosing a value ≤40 mm Hg. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale analysis of urologists' perceptions of ureteroscopic IRP. It identifies high levels of concern among the global urologic community, with almost unanimous agreement that elevated IRP is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Equipoise remains regarding appropriate IRP limits intraoperatively and the most appropriate technical strategies to ensure adherence to these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M Croghan
- Strategic Academic Recruitment (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kieran J Breen
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barry B McGuire
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rustom P Manecksha
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, NUHS, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Sorcha O'Meara
- Strategic Academic Recruitment (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Esteban Emiliani
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Ana María Autrán Gomez
- Department of Urology, Lyx Urology, Madrid, Spain
- Office of Research, the American Confederation of Urology (CAU), Madrid, Spain
| | - Deepak Agarwal
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Emre Şener
- Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fergal J O'Brien
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Necole M Streeper
- Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christian Seitz
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Urolithiasis Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niall F Davis
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kwok JL, De Coninck V, Pietropaolo A, Juliebø-Jones P, Ventimiglia E, Tailly T, Alexander Schmid F, Hunziker M, Poyet C, Traxer O, Eberli D, Keller EX. Instrumental dead space and proximal working channel connector design in flexible ureteroscopy: a new concept. Ther Adv Urol 2023; 15:17562872231179332. [PMID: 37377944 PMCID: PMC10291398 DOI: 10.1177/17562872231179332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate a new concept in flexible ureteroscopy: instrumental dead space (IDS). For this purpose, various proximal working channel connector designs, as well as the impact of ancillary devices occupying the working channel were evaluated in currently available flexible ureteroscopes. Design and methods IDS was defined as the volume of saline irrigation needed to inject at the proximal connector for delivery at the distal working channel tip. Because IDS is related to working channel diameter and length, proximal connector design, as well as occupation of working channel by ancillary devices, these parameters were also reviewed. Results IDS significantly varied between flexible ureteroscope models, ranging from 1.1 ml for the Pusen bare scopes, to 2.3 ml for Olympus scopes with their 4-way connector (p < 0.001). Proximal connector designs showed a high degree of variability in the number of available Luer locks, valves, seals, angles, and rotative characteristics. The measured length of the working channel of bare scopes ranged between 739 and 854 mm and significantly correlated with measured IDS (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.001). The coupling of scopes with an alternative ancillary proximal connector and the insertion of ancillary devices into the working channel significantly reduced IDS (mean IDS reduction of 0.1 to 0.5 ml; p < 0.001). Conclusions IDS appears as a new parameter that should be considered for future applications of flexible ureteroscopes. A low IDS seems desirable for several clinical applications. The main factors impacting IDS are working channel and proximal connector design, as well as ancillary devices inserted into the working channel. Future studies should clarify how reducing IDS may affect irrigation flow, intrarenal pressure, and direct in-scope suction, as well as evaluate the most desirable proximal connector design properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Lun Kwok
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Vincent De Coninck
- Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
- Endourology & Urolithiasis Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), Paris, France
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Endourology & Urolithiasis Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Endourology & Urolithiasis Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Eugenio Ventimiglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Endourology & Urolithiasis Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), Paris, France
| | - Thomas Tailly
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Endourology & Urolithiasis Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manuela Hunziker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, F-75020, Paris, France
- Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), Paris, France
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|