Gender Affirming Hormone Replacement for the Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivor with Hypogonadism

Position paper of the Italian association of medical oncology on health disparities among transgender and gender-diverse people: the Assisi recommendations

Transgender and gender-diverse individuals experience substantial health disparities across the cancer care continuum. Despite well recognized unique healthcare needs, there are barriers in accessing cancer prevention and treatment services, influenced by disadvantages in key social-economic determinants of health which result in worse clinical outcomes, as compared to the general population. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) acknowledges the critical relevance of this issue. The "Assisi Recommendations" here summarize the outcomes of the "AIOM Oncology Ethics Day" dedicated to gender differences in oncology and cancer care of transgender and gender-diverse people. The recommendations generated during a 2-day multidisciplinary discussion address the various aspects of cancer care experience of transgender and gender-diverse people. The promotion of research in this field, through the generation of new evidence and the collection of prospective data, has been identified as a priority action to mitigate these disparities. By acknowledging the challenges of cancer care in transgender and gender-diverse people and recognizing the need for dedicated policy and clinical recommendations, AIOM demonstrates its commitment to improving the health and well-being of all patients with cancer, regardless of their gender identity or any other personal or social circumstances, as part of health-for-all societal vision.

Clinical Characteristics, Experiences, and Outcomes of Transgender Patients With Cancer

Importance

More than 1 million people in the US identify as transgender; however, few studies have examined the experiences and outcomes of transgender patients with cancer.

Objective

To examine clinical characteristics, experiences, and outcomes of transgender patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective case series assessed transgender patients with at least 1 cancer diagnosis who were evaluated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute or Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics for all patients and documentation by oncologic practitioners of important aspects of providing gender-affirming care, including pronouns used by the patient, were recorded.

Results

A total of 37 transgender patients with cancer were assessed (mean [SD] age, 38.9 [21.8] years at first cancer diagnosis). Fifteen patients (40.5%) had hematologic malignant cancers, and 25 patients (67.6%) had solid malignant tumors. Sixteen patients (43.2%) initiated gender-affirming hormone therapy or surgery after their cancer diagnosis. Cancer treatment was frequently multimodal, with 24 patients (64.9%) receiving systemic therapy, 24 (64.9%) receiving surgery, and 20 (54.1%) receiving radiation therapy along with other cancer-directed treatment, such as cryoablation. Five patients (13.5%) had documentation from an oncologic practitioner that addressed a potential interaction between their gender-affirming care and their cancer treatment. Thirty-three patients had follow-up visits with oncologic practitioners after starting their transition. Of those patients, pronouns used were documented by a member of the oncologic team for 4 patients (12.1%). However, for 3 of the 4 patients, documentation did not consistently use patient-reported information. At the last follow-up, 5 patients (13.5%) had died of their disease, and 26 (70.3%) were living without disease.

Conclusions and Relevance

This case series study found that transgender patients were diagnosed with diverse cancers, and many initiated gender-affirming hormone therapy or surgery after their diagnosis. Documentation by oncologic practitioners infrequently included pronouns used by the patient or discussion surrounding the interactions between cancer treatment and gender-affirming care, signifying that urgent improvements are needed in cancer care for transgender patients.