The biological properties, assay, and standardization of interferon-alpha: a need for a WHO collaborative study

A Novel Cell-based In vitro Assay for Antiviral Activity of Interferons α, β, and γ by qPCR of MxA Gene Expression

BACKGROUND

Human MxA gene is related to the class of interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes (ISGs) that plays a role in antiviral resistance.

OBJECTIVE

Implementation of standard curves obtained from designing a procedure for data processing in relative qPCR between MxA expression and interferon's antiviral activity (IU/ml). These standard curves can be used to detect the antiviral activity of any new compound rapidly and safely.

METHODS

To detect the optimum incubation time for maximum MxA gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), the isolated human PBMCs (1x106 cells) were incubated with a concentration of 1000 IU/ml of each IFN at different time intervals; 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 24 h post-treatment. A standard curve was performed for each IFN (α, β, and γ) at different concentrations (250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, and 2000 IU/ml).

RESULTS

As observed at 4 h incubation time of 1000 IU/ml concentration, IFN-γ provided a higher expression of MxA compared to IFN-α and IFN-β. Correlation analyses between IFN-α and IFN-β, IFN-β and IFN-γ were non-significant. However, there was a significant correlation between IFN-α and IFN-γ (p<0.01). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that cut-off values of IFN- γ, IFN-β, and IFN-α were 58.14 > 7.31 and > 3.33, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative expression of MxA is a biomarker for IFN-α, β, and γ, especially IFN-α. It has compiled and validated a standard curve-based protocol for PCR data processing. It shows that the standard curve is an easy alternative tool to assess antiviral activity. We revised all patents relating to the antiviral assays of the used interferons.

Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines--a review

Cytokines are bioactive proteins produced by many different cells of the immune system. Due to their role in different inflammatory disease states and maintaining homeostasis, there is enormous clinical interest in the quantitation of cytokines. The typical standard methods for quantitation of cytokines are immunoassay-based techniques including enzyme-linked immusorbent assays (ELISA) and bead-based immunoassays read by either standard or modified flow cytometers. A review of recent developments in analytical methods for measurements of cytokine proteins is provided. This review briefly covers cytokine biology and the analysis challenges associated with measurement of these biomarker proteins for understanding both health and disease. New techniques applied to immunoassay-based assays are presented along with the uses of aptamers, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, optical resonator-based methods. Methods used for elucidating the release of cytokines from single cells as well as in vivo collection methods are described.

Establishment of new and replacement World Health Organization International Biological Standards for human interferon alpha and omega

The complexity of the human interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) family, with its multiple molecular forms and various biological activities, raises a number of scientific issues with regard to the biological standardisation of natural and recombinant IFN-alpha products. To address such issues and to achieve an appropriate biological standardisation of human interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) preparations, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) of the United Kingdom (UK), in association with the Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the United States of America (USA), organised an international collaborative study, which was subsequently divided into two parts. Ninety-three participating laboratories from 29 countries worldwide participated in the first part of the study. They performed titrations on up to 15 different IFN-alpha preparations and one IFN-omega (omega) preparation in a variety of assays, including those based upon antiviral, antiproliferative, and other biological activities of IFN, and contributed raw data from these assays to NIBSC for analysis and calculation of relative activities. Analysis of data from this part of the study showed a greater than expected assay-dependent disparity between the relative activities of different IFN-alpha preparations. This disparity was found when only antiviral assays were considered and even when there were only small molecular dissimilarities between two otherwise closely related IFN-alpha preparations. The lack of assay independence and relative activity equivalence has indicated that a single biological potency standard for all IFN-alpha subtypes and mixtures would be inappropriate. Hence, individual, homologous standards, each with a separate unitage, were required for biological standardisation and potency determinations of individual IFN-alpha subtypes. At this stage, potency assignments to the IFN-alpha and -omega preparations included in the study were made as far as possible on the basis of comparison of antiviral activity with that of the 1st International Reference Preparation (IRP) for IFN, human leukocyte, 69/19. However, it was recognised that other standards had been used in assays to estimate potencies of widely available, current, therapeutic IFN-alpha products. Thus, to ensure the continuity of unitages already in use for IFN-alpha products, the second part of the study, which involved 12 members of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (IFPMA), was carried out using for calibration of antiviral assays those IFN-alpha preparations that most closely matched manufacturers' products or that had been previously used for assay calibration by a manufacturer for a particular product. On the basis of data analysis from the second part of the study, potency assignments to the IFN-alpha preparations, as made in the first part of the study, were either left unchanged or changed to potency assignments that ensured as far as possible continuity with existing unitages. From among the IFN preparations evaluated, the following were recommended as the most suitable to continue or replace existing WHO international standards (IS) and have subsequently been formally established as WHO IS at the 51st meeting (October 1999) of the WHO ECBS: 83/514, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha1 8000 international units (IU); 95/650, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2a, 63,000 IU; 95/566, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2b, 70,000 IU; 95/580, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2c, 40,000 IU; 95/572, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha1/8, 27,000 IU; 94/786, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alphaCon1, 100,000 IU; 94/784, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (leukocyte), 11,000 IU; 95/574, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (leukocyte n3), 60,000 IU; 95/568, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (lymphoblastoid n1), 38,000 IU; 94/754, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-omega, 20,000 IU. These WHO IS are available upon request to NIBSC.

WHO cytokine standardization: facilitating the development of cytokines in research, diagnosis and as therapeutic agents

The development and widespread application of recombinant DNA technology has dramatically increased the number of cytokines available for clinical evaluation. New and novel cytokines are being discovered, cloned and entered into clinical trials at such a rate that it is often the case that the biological activities of these proteins are poorly understood during their development as therapeutic agents. In addition, manufacturers of any one cytokine can produce the protein from different cellular sources resulting in materials that exhibit markedly different specific activities. When estimating the amount of biological activity of different preparations with different specific activities by bioassay, mass units cannot be used and biological activity is therefore expressed as 'biological potency units'. The biological unit requires definition by a standard that is assay-independent (especially when measuring a particular type of biological activity). In many cases, a variety of assay methods will be available and the material chosen for a standard should ideally be suitable for use with as many of them as possible. Once the unit is defined, this can be used in any laboratory, thus providing a means of ensuring uniformity throughout the world in the designation of potency of different biological preparations. The World Health Organisation (WHO) standardization programme involves the production of biologically stable, well characterised potency and immunoassay standards that are available world-wide using a single international unitage. Over the years, WHO international standards have been used to dramatically reduce the variation in estimates of cytokine preparations within and between laboratories for immunoassays and bioassays. WHO international standards are primary reference preparations against which secondary, or working standards (including regional standards, national standards, pharmacopoeial standards and in-house working standards) can be calibrated.