Effectiveness of dorzolamide–timolol (COSOPT) in patients who were treatment naive for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the COSOPT first-line study

[Efficacy and safety of the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol (Dorzotimol) in primary open-angle glaucoma]

Safe and effective glaucoma treatment remains a critical task in ophthalmology. Newly introduced medications, in addition to mandatory registration trials, are also evaluated in real-world clinical settings.

PURPOSE

This study assesses the efficacy and safety of the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol (Dorzotimol) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in real-world clinical settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 55 patients aged 46 to 75 years with stage I and II POAG. The initial mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24.07±1.31 mm Hg. All patients were prescribed the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol.

RESULTS

The mean IOP after 1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks of therapy was 19.20±2.46, 18.48±2.04, 17.88±1.88, and 17.62±1.63 mm Hg, respectively. After 12 weeks of therapy, IOP reduction to 18 mm Hg was observed in 63.64% of patients, a reduction of 20% or more from baseline in 81.82% of patients, and a reduction of 30% or more in 14.55% of patients. No serious adverse events were recorded during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high hypotensive efficacy and safety of the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol (Dorzotimol).

Efficacy and safety of timolol-dorzolamide fixed-combination three times a day versus two times a day in newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma

Objective

This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol fixed-combination(Cosopt) in newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.

Methods

In this prospective, interventional case series, newly POAG patients were included. Patients were started on Cosopt twice a day (BID) for one month and then switched to three times a day (TDS) for an additional month. Patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examination, diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure (BP), and 24-h heart rate (HR) measurements at baseline, month 1(BID), and month 2(TDS). Throughout the study, all adverse events were monitored by the investigators.

Results

In 31 POAG patients that completed the study, the mean baseline IOP was 23.1 ± 3.15 mmHg. IOP was decreased significantly 16.5 ± 2.21 at one month (p < .0001) and 13.9 ± 2.23 mmHg at 1 and 2 months follow up (p < .0001). IOP was significantly lower in month 2 compared to month 1 (p = .0004). While Cosopt BID significantly reduced the mean 24-h systolic BP and mean 24-h HR from baseline (p < .0001), the mean 24-h systolic BP and HR remained unchanged with Cosopt TDS compared to BID (p = .62).

Conclusions

Cosopt TDS has a superior IOP-lowering effect than Cosopt BID in POAG patients with comparable safety profiles.

Management Of Glaucoma In Developing Countries: Challenges And Opportunities For Improvement

Glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness in the developed and developing world. Not only is the clinical impact of this disease considerable, but associated economic and humanistic burdens - affecting patients, caregivers, and society - are substantial. Since glaucoma is an age-related disorder and populations in many developing countries are aging at a faster pace than in the developed world, increasing attention is being focused on ways to ameliorate the burdens of illness. In this paper, we examine the burdens of glaucoma with particular focus on developing countries, discuss some of the challenges that exist in delivering optimal glaucoma management within budget constraints, and bring into perspective how we could improve current healthcare systems, leverage technology, and strike an appropriate balance between cost and quality of care, thereby offering considerations to payors and policymakers in these countries that may result in longer-term cost savings, while concurrently striving to achieve the WHO Vision on the prevention of blindness and visual impairment.

Comparison of the Effects of Dorzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination versus Latanoprost on Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Normal-Tension Glaucoma: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial

BACKGROUD

To assess the noninferiority of a dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) versus latanoprost in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) and to compare blood pressure (BP), ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) and diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (DOPP) between the latanoprost and DTFC groups in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

Prospective, interventional, randomized, single-blinded, crossover design study. Patients with newly diagnosed NTG that had not been treated with a glaucoma medication in the most recent 2 months were recruited. In total, 44 patients with NTG were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in group A were treated with DTFC, lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each, whereas patients in group B were treated with latanoprost, lubricant, and DTFC for 4 weeks each. Patients were examined on day 1 (without medication), week 4 (under medication), week 8 (without medication), and week 12 (under medication). At weeks 4 and 12, diurnal IOP, systolic and diastolic BP, and OPP were measured at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic characteristics showed no difference in terms of age, sex, central corneal thickness, spherical equivalent, or stage of glaucoma between the groups. The between-group difference was -0.19 ± 0.18 mmHg (mean ± SE, upper bound of one-sided 95% CI, 0.12). Diurnal IOP showed no difference between the groups with an average IOP reduction of 13.1% using latanoprost and 12.3% using DTFC. Diurnal systolic and diastolic BP were lower in the DTFC group than the latanoprost group; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Diurnal OPP and DOPP also showed no statistically significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP lowering efficacy of DTFC was noninferior to that of latanoprost in newly diagnosed NTG patients. There was no difference in BP, OPP, or DOPP between the latanoprost and DTFC groups. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover study demonstrated the noninferiority of DTFC versus latanoprost in terms of IOP in patients with NTG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01175902.

Efficacy and Safety of Glaucoma Patients' Switch from a 2% Dorzolamide/0.5% Timolol Fixed-Combination Brand-Name Drug to Its Generic Counterpart

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the brand-name and generic 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed-combination (DTFC) drugs in glaucoma patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center study, in which patients using only the brand-name DTFC (Cosopt(®); Merck and Co, Inc.) drug and those using Cosopt with prostaglandin analogs (PGs) were enrolled. In the patients using Cosopt (Group A) and Cosopt with PGs (Group B), Cosopt was switched to its generic counterpart (Batidor(®); Bausch & Lomb, Inc.). The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured before the switch and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the switch in both groups. The questionnaire on the discomfort symptoms and on the discomfort score for the use of eye drops was answered by the patients in both groups before the switch and 12 weeks after the switch.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study, 62 in Group A and 50 in Group B. The IOPs before the switch and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the switch showed no statistical difference in both groups (P>0.05). There were higher incidences of bitter taste and blurring with Cosopt, and there was a higher incidence of headache with Batidor in both groups, but no significant differences (P>0.05) were noted. There was, likewise, no significant difference in the discomfort score between 2 drugs in both groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

After the switch, the IOP-lowering effect of the generic drug Batidor was similar to that of the brand-name drug Cosopt in the monotherapy and combination therapy with PGs. No significant differences were found in terms of the discomfort symptoms and discomfort score between the 2 drugs.

Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and were randomized 1:1 to BTFC or LM. Patients instilled one drop of medication once per day at 8 pm for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients enrolled, 43 were randomized to BTFC and 38 to LM. Mean (SD) change in IOP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater for BTFC than for LM: -13.5 mmHg (4.48) versus -11.4 mmHg (3.19), respectively (P=0.003). Similarly, at 12 weeks, significantly more BTFC patients than LM patients had IOP reductions of ≥40% (74.4% versus 47.4%, P=0.015) or ≥50% (46.5% versus 15.8%, P=0.003). Adverse events were more frequent with BTFC than with LM (33 versus 13 events), but most were mild in severity. The only serious adverse event (colon cancer) was adjudged unrelated to the study medication.

CONCLUSION

BTFC was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve patients with OAG at high risk of progression.

Effect of tafluprost 0.0015% on central corneal thickness in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of tafluprost on the central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

This was a prospective study and included 100 eyes of 54 patients with POAG. All patients received tafluprost 0.0015% (Saflutan®) once daily in one or both eyes. CCT was measured by using noncontact pachymetry prior to the treatment and after 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean CCT of all treated eyes (n = 100) was 547.79 ± 29.48 μm at baseline, 535.61 ± 26.54 μm after 6 months and 533.55 ± 26.45 μm after 12 months (Student's t test, p < 0.0001). Ninety-three percent of all treated eyes showed a decrease of CCT. CCT reduction was more significant within the first six months of the treatment period (Student's t test, p < 0.0001). After 12 months, a CCT reduction >25 μm occurred in 5% of all treated eyes. There was a significant positive correlation between the magnitude of corneal thinning and the initial CCT (Pearson, r = 0.49, p < 0.0001) but not between the magnitude of corneal thinning and intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (Pearson, r = 0.145, p = 0.15).

DISCUSSION

Long-term use of tafluprost may decrease the CCT in patients with POAG. Consequently, clinicians must be aware of prolongated CCT variations that may arise throughout the follow-up period for proper IOP targeting and management.

Intraocular pressure reduction using a fixed combination of timolol maleate 0.5% and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% administered three times daily

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fixed combination of timolol maleate 0.5% + brimonidine tartrate 0.2% (Combigan®) for reduction for intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma when the dose frequency is increased from twice to three times daily.

Methods

The patients included had either primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Those who were previously on treatment completed a drug washout period prior to inclusion. IOP was measured at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment with Combigan twice daily, and again after a further 4 weeks of Combigan three times daily. Blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were also recorded at each assessment.

Results

Thirty-one eyes from 31 patients were included. Increasing the Combigan dose frequency resulted in a statistically significant (P < 0.001) additional reduction in IOP of 2.25 ± 1.18 mmHg, corresponding to a further 10.3% reduction in IOP from baseline. No local or systemic adverse effects were documented.

Conclusion

Treatment with Combigan three times daily was more effective in reducing IOP than the twice-daily regimen, with no increase in adverse effects.

Intraocular pressure reduction of fixed combination timolol maleate 0.5% and dorzolamide 2% (Cosopt) administered three times a day

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy in intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction of increasing Cosopt dosage from twice to three times a day.

Methods

The study included patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After a washout period, IOP was measured at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment with Cosopt twice a day, and after another 4 weeks of treatment with Cosopt three times a day. Blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation levels were also recorded.

Results

Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients were included. Increasing Cosopt dosage resulted in a statistically significant (P < 0.001) additional reduction in IOP of 2.2 ± 1.58 mmHg (10.69% ± 7.49% of the baseline IOP values). There were no local or systemic adverse effects.

Conclusion

Treatment with Cosopt three times a day was more effective in reducing IOP than twice a day, with no effect on safety.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fixed combination therapy with dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and timolol maleate 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Glaucoma is a collection of diseases characterized by multifactorial progressive changes leading to visual field loss and optic neuropathy most frequently due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). The goal of treatment is the lowering of the IOP to prevent additional optic nerve damage. Treatment usually begins with topical pharmacological agents as monotherapy, progresses to combination therapy with agents from up to 4 different classes of IOP-lowering medications, and then proceeds to laser or incisional surgical modalities for refractory cases. The fixed combination therapy with the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and the beta blocker timolol maleate 0.5% is now available in a generic formulation for the treatment of patients who have not responded sufficiently to monotherapy with beta adrenergic blockers. In pre- and postmarketing clinical studies, the fixed combination dorzolamide–timolol has been shown to be safe and efficacious, and well tolerated by patients. The fixed combination dorzolamide–timolol is convenient for patients, reduces their dosing regimen with the goal of increasing their compliance, reduces the effects of “washout” when instilling multiple drops, and reduces the preservative burden by reducing the number of drops administered per day.