A case of progesterone-induced anaphylaxis, cyclic urticaria/angioedema, and autoimmune dermatitis

Progestogen Hypersensitivity

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by diverse cutaneous manifestations, bronchospasm, and/or anaphylaxis. Possible triggers include ovarian progesterone and exogenous progestogens. The timing of symptoms is critical to diagnose PH: during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle for the endogenous form and after exposure to progestins for exogenous PH. Diagnostic modalities such as progesterone skin testing have low sensitivity and specificity for PH. When exogenous PH is suspected, the allergist should consider a progestogen challenge. Treatment strategies should be tailored for each patient, including symptom-directed therapies, ovulation suppression, and progesterone desensitization. Future studies should explore the mechanisms of PH, validation of diagnostic criteria, and standardization of treatment strategies.

A focused report on progestogen hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Progestogen Hypersensitivity (PH) is caused by increased sensitivity to either exogenous or endogenous progestogens. It is characterized by recurrent cutaneous eruptions including erythema multiforme, eczema, urticaria, and angioedema, which may be associated with systemic symptoms including asthma and anaphylaxis.

AREAS COVERED

Symptoms may be persistent or cyclical, coinciding with progestogen levels. With increased use of oral contraceptives and hormonal treatments for fertility, the prevalence of PH is expected to continuously increase. Several proposed immunological mechanisms, diagnostics, and treatment modalities have been proposed. Most treatments focus on suppressing ovulation and progesterone secretion or inducing tolerance through progesterone desensitization.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there has been increased recognition both clinically and in the medical literature, there is still a general lack of knowledge of PH and its clinical features in the medical community. An improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology as well as more available commercial testis, such as ELISA that accurately measures specific IgE to progesterone, are expected to broaden and improve opportunities for disease recognition and symptom control. It is essential for physicians across specialties to recognize how to diagnose PH and either manage this condition or refer these patients to a specialist with experience treating PH.

Delayed pressure urticaria manifesting as dyspareunia - is it that uncommon?

Delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) is a variant of physical urticaria characterised by reproducible whealing on application of sustained pressure to the skin. Clinical manifestations include delayed cutaneous erythema, edema and subcutaneous swelling, typically occurring 4-6h after application of mechanical pressure. Dyspareunia is defined as persistent or recurrent pain in the genital area or within the pelvis that occurs just before, during, or after sexual intercourse. We report an unusual case of DPU manifesting as dyspareunia.

Whole course of treatment of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis that had spontaneously resolved during pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature

Anaphylaxis due to autoimmune progesterone dermatitis is a rare but severe allergic disease in women. The clinical manifestations of APD are diverse, and a proper understanding of the disease can help even diagnose and treat it. A case of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis related in our department is reported as follows. She developed a rash with severe pruritus that was highly consistent with her menstrual cycle without any trigger 10 years ago. Laboratory tests were unremarkable. But all the symptoms disappeared during her pregnancy and resurfaced after the miscarriage. Two years ago, after a positive progesterone intradermal test confirmed the diagnosis of PH, she was given mifepristone, contraceptives(OCPs), and skin embedding treatment, and her symptoms improved.

Autoimmune Progesterone Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (AIPD) is a cyclical, cutaneous reaction to endogenous progesterone that occurs throughout the menstrual cycle. The cutaneous manifestations of AIPD vary greatly from patient to patient, ranging anywhere from urticaria to erythema multiforme to anaphylaxis. As such, recognition, diagnosis, and management of this condition are difficult for clinicians. In the present article, we conducted a systematic review of 112 articles and 132 individual cases to summarize the clinical features and presentation of AIPD while also summarizing the successes and failures of different treatment plans. Despite the great variety in clinical presentations, it is clear from the data that ovulation-suppressing medical therapies and surgery have the greatest success in treating AIPD, whereas more commonly used therapies such as antihistamines and systemic corticosteroids frequently fail in providing any relief. Further research is necessary to determine the exact pathogenesis of AIPD and allow for more targeted treatment.

Hormonal Effects on Urticaria and Angioedema Conditions

Women appear to be more frequently affected with urticaria and angioedema. Sex hormones are believed to have an important mechanistic role in regulating pathways involved in these conditions. This effect is likely nonspecific for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) or many forms of angioedema (AE), because many other chronic diseases such as asthma are also affected by sex hormones. The role of sex hormones has been better elucidated for hereditary AE, because they have been shown to have multiple effects including upregulation of FXII, an important activator of the kallikrein pathway. However, their role in the underlying pathogenesis for CSU is less clear. Autoimmunity is clearly linked to CSU, which is more common in women. This suggests that sex hormones could act as adjuvants in activating or upregulating autoimmune pathways. The purpose of this review is to discuss in detail the role of sex hormones in CSU and AE and how a better understanding of the impact hormones has on these conditions might lead to new treatment advancements with better clinical outcomes.

Progestogen Sensitization: a Unique Female Presentation of Anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a condition which typically occurs in women in childbearing years with a spectrum of symptoms ranging from urticaria with or without angioedema, dermatitis to systemic anaphylaxis. Herein, a clinical case of PH is presented followed by a discussion on the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of PH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progestogen hypersensitivity (a.k.a. "autoimmune progesterone dermatitis") symptoms are associated with exogenous progestin exposure (e.g., contraceptive medicines, in vitro fertilization therapy) or endogenous progesterone from progesterone surges during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. This condition can be difficult to recognize due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation. The mechanism of PH is believed to be primarily IgE-mediated; however, less commonly other immune responses may be involved. There is now a useful progesterone specific IgE immunoassay to assist in diagnosis and well-defined treatment algorithms that can be used to successfully manage PH. The epidemiology of PH is still poorly elucidated but is likely to be encountered by clinicians and especially allergists given the extensive use of oral contraceptives and increased use of supra-physiologic doses of progesterone required to support pregnancy in IVF. Including PH in the differential diagnosis of women presenting with cyclic hypersensitivity will accelerate diagnosis and successful management of this condition.

Catamenial dermatoses associated with autoimmune, inflammatory, and systemic diseases: A systematic review,

Background

Sex hormones are important in female sexual physiology, growth, and homeostasis. Through skin receptors, sex hormones contribute to the dermatologic pathology known as catamenial dermatoses.

Objective

This study aims to summarize the literature on catamenial dermatoses and menses-induced exacerbations of chronic dermatoses.

Methods

This systematic review used the PRISMA method. PubMed was searched using the terms “menses” and “skin” in July 2018, and an assessment was conducted of the relevant literature on skin diseases related to non-pathologic menstruation, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome. Pathology associated with androgenetic acne was excluded from the study.

Results

A total of 102 studies with 1269 female patients were included. The most commonly reported primary catamenial dermatoses were autoimmune progesterone dermatitis and autoimmune estrogen dermatitis. The most commonly reported chronic skin disorders exacerbated by menses were psoriasis, Behcet’s disease, and eczematous dermatoses.

Conclusion

Physicians should be aware of the nature of catamenial dermatoses and their presentation with normal sexual physiology. Patients with chronic dermatoses should be appropriately counseled on menstruation-related exacerbations. Further research needs to be conducted to determine the interplay between immune regulation and sex hormones in catamenial dermatoses and to elucidate effective therapies.

Development of a progesterone-specific IgE assay for diagnosing patients with suspected progestogen hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

Progesterone hypersensitivity (PH) manifests as a spectrum of allergic symptoms during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Confirming progesterone-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE; sIgE) by skin testing is unreliable because of irritant responses.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a progesterone sIgE assay to assist in diagnosing PH.

METHODS

A progesterone-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate was characterized and used to analyze sera collected from women in our center with suspected PH in a 1-batch enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to establish high, low and negative cut-points. Sera collected from healthy nonatopic female subjects and from women with classical PH symptoms were included as negative and positive controls, respectively. Values exceeding the average negative control (OD + 3× the standard deviation) were considered positive. These cut-points were subsequently used to establish positive and negative results for serum from women with suspected PH received from other centers. A subset of high positive sera was used for ELISA-inhibition and in a beta-hexosaminidase mediator release assay to evaluate the specificity and functional relevance of progesterone-specific serum IgE, respectively. The numbers of true negative, false negative, true positive, and false positive samples were determined.

RESULTS

The direct progesterone sIgE ELISA results ranged from high positive to low positive and negative compared with healthy nonatopic control sera. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition and beta-hexosaminidase mediator release confirmed specificity and functional relevance of progesterone-sIgE, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity positive predictive values and negative predictive values were found to be 82%, 100%, 86%, and 100%, respectively, using the mediator release assay results as the gold standard.

CONCLUSION

This assay has a good specificity and positive predictive value for screening women with suspected PH for progesterone sIgE.

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis manifesting as generalized fixed drug eruption

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis is an uncommon, poorly recognized and under-diagnosed catamenial dermatosis associated with hypersensitivity reactions to progestagens. Most cases manifest as urticaria, eczema or erythema multiforme-like. A 26-year-old woman developed violaceous plaques on the groin and abdomen, 4 days after a spontaneous abortion resolved with uterine curettage. The lesions recurred once monthly at the same sites, mimicking a fixed drug eruption. Although the histopathology was compatible with fixed drug eruption, positive intradermal testing and symptomatic improvement after using oral contraceptive pills gave us a clue to the diagnosis.

Presentation and natural history of progestogen hypersensitivity

OBJECTIVE

To review the published medical literature on the clinical presentation, risk factors, and natural history of hypersensitivity reactions to progestogens.

DATA SOURCES

Through the use of PubMed, we conducted a review of allergy, dermatology, and obstetric literature for cases and case series of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to exogenous or endogenous progestogens. There are no longitudinal, prospective studies related to progestogen hypersensitivity.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Publications were selected that described cases that were clinically consistent with progesterone hypersensitivity and positive test results or clear symptoms with exposure to progestogens to confirm the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Progestogen hypersensitivity symptoms can be triggered by endogenous progesterone or exogenous progestins used for contraception or fertility treatments. Symptoms are varied and include dermatitis, urticaria, asthma, and anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Although the medical literature on progestogen hypersensitivity is limited to case reports and small case series, significant heterogeneity exists in clinical presentation among patients.

Anaphylaxis in the 21st century: phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers

Anaphylaxis is the most serious of all allergic reactions and can be fatal. The diagnosis is frequently delayed, and misdiagnosis often occurs with asthma or urticaria. Biomarkers such as tryptase are not routinely checked, and appropriate treatment with epinephrine is not administered in a majority of cases, increasing the risk of poor outcomes. The objective of this review is to provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis with a description of phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers available in both the clinical and research settings. Expanding knowledge with regard to the presentation, causes, and triggers for anaphylaxis among health care providers will improve its diagnosis and management, increase patient safety, and decrease morbidity and mortality.

Progestogen Hypersensitivity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a rare disorder which usually occurs in women of childbearing age with symptoms ranging from urticaria with or without angioedema, multiple organ involvement consistent with allergic anaphylaxis, to a spectrum of other non-evanescent skin eruptions. In this review, we present a clinical vignette of PH and discuss the clinical presentation and proposed pathomechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of PH.

RECENT FINDINGS

The hypersensitivity symptoms are associated with exogenous progestin exposure (e.g., contraceptive medicines, in vitro fertilization therapy) or endogenous progesterone from progesterone surges during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Recognition of this condition can be challenging to the clinician due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation. It has been recently proposed to use the new term "progestogen hypersensitivity" to replace "autoimmune progesterone dermatitis" due to the lack of evidence supporting an autoimmune mechanism for this disorder. In addition, diagnostic and treatment algorithms are now available that can lead to successful management of this condition. More new developments of Progesterone desensitization protocols are now available which appear to be the safest and most effective long-term treatment option for PH. With the extensive use of oral contraceptives and increased use of supra-physiologic doses of progesterone to support pregnancy in in vitro fertilization, there is likely to be a higher prevalence of PH in the future than currently recognized. Therefore, the allergist-immunologist will be required to collaborate with gynecologists and reproductive endocrinologists to diagnose and treat this condition.

Sex hormone allergy: clinical aspects, causes and therapeutic strategies - Update and secondary publication

Sex hormone allergy as a clinical syndrome has been known for almost a century. Due to the diversity of clinical presentation regarding symptoms and disease patterns, the optimal patient care represents an enormous interdisciplinary challenge. Frequently, hypersensitivity reactions affect more than one sex hormone and double positive tests for estrogen and progesterone have been described. Since the menstrual cycle dependent symptoms range from skin afflictions, gynecological problems to non-specific reactions, different pathophysiological mechanisms seem likely.

Various desensitization protocols are described as causal treatment options, but are rarely applied in clinical routine. Consequently, major research efforts with a quick translation of therapeutic interventions into clinical practice will be crucial to help affected patients in the future.

Progestogen Hypersensitivity: An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Management in Clinical Practice

Heterogeneous presentations of disease pose particular diagnostic and management challenges to the clinician. Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) classically consists of hypersensitivity symptoms to endogenous progesterone during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. However, with the rise of assisted fertility and the exponential growth in the use of exogenous progestins for contraception, PH's prevalence and symptom heterogeneity have increased. In this article, we focus on the clinical approach to PH diagnosis with an emphasis on key elements of the history, physical, and testing modalities. We also review the current evidence for successful management and treatment across a broad range of patients.

Progestogen Hypersensitivity in 24 Cases: Diagnosis, Management, and Proposed Renaming and Classification

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis is a poorly recognized syndrome associated with a hypersensitivity to progestogens. Symptoms present heterogeneously, which may complicate diagnosis. Management has generally centered on symptomatic control with medication. Recently, an increasing number of cases have been reported with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Desensitization to progestogens is suggested as an approach to tolerate fertility treatments and provide symptom control.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the diagnosis and management of progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) and to detail the use of desensitization. We also propose a new terminology of progestogen hypersensitivity instead of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis, and a classification system based on exogenous and endogenous progestogen triggers to facilitate diagnosis and management.

METHODS

Twenty-four cases of PH were evaluated retrospectively. Symptom presentation, diagnostic modalities, desensitization protocols, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Symptom onset was classified as a reaction to either endogenous progesterone (42%) or exogenous progestogens (58%). Symptoms were heterogeneous and included cyclical dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, asthma, and anaphylaxis. Triggers were also heterogenous and included progesterone as well as progestins. Eleven patients underwent intramuscular (27%) or oral (73%) desensitization. Desensitization resulted in symptom control in 8 patients, IVF medication tolerance in 3 patients, and 2 pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest case series of patients with PH with successful treatment outcomes. The new terminology progestogen hypersensitivity more accurately represents the diversity of presentations to endogenous or exogenous progestogens. We demonstrate that progestogen desensitization is successful in multiple patients and can result in symptom control and fertility. Women with cyclical allergic symptoms, including those undergoing IVF, should be evaluated for PH.

Dangerous triplet: Polycystic ovary syndrome, oral contraceptives and Kounis syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome is characterized by ovulatory dysfunction, androgen excess and polycystic ovaries and is associated with hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular events. Oral contraceptives constitute first-line treatment, particularly when symptomatic hyperandrogenism is present. However, these drugs are associated with cardiovascular events and hypersensitivity reactions that pose problem in differential diagnosis and therapy. We present a 14 year-old female with polycystic ovary syndrome taking oral contraceptive and suffering from recurrent coronary ischemic attacks with increased eosinophils, and troponin levels suggesting Kounis syndrome.

Heterogeneity in presentation and treatment of catamenial anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Few reports have documented the uncommon association of the female menstrual cycle with anaphylaxis, an entity known as cyclic or catamenial anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To examine cases of perimenstrual anaphylaxis, focusing on differences in presentation and response to treatment, in the hopes of enriching the description of this rare entity.

METHODS

A cohort of 8 women with catamenial anaphylaxis were identified and retrospectively compared with regard to age at onset, organ involvement, diagnostic studies, and response to therapy.

RESULTS

The median age at onset was 34 years (range, 14-40 years), and the median number of perimenstrual anaphylactic episodes at presentation was 10 per patient (range, 4-24 per patient). Most had cutaneous and gastrointestinal symptoms. The results of extensive investigations for anaphylactic triggers were negative, and masquerading conditions, such as carcinoid syndrome, pheochromocytoma, and systemic mastocytosis, were ruled out in all patients. Skin test results for progesterone were negative in all but 1 of 4 patients tested. None had elevated total serum IgE levels. Response to suppressive treatments regimens varied considerably, but none treated with high-dose systemic steroids had improvement. Similarly, ketotifen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and oral contraceptives failed to control the anaphylactic reactions. Although antihistamines failed in 7 patients, 1 had improvement. Others responded to leuprolide, medroxyprogesterone, or salpingo-oophorectomy.

CONCLUSION

Whether the mechanism causing cyclical anaphylaxis may involve hypersensitivity to progesterone or prostaglandins, the variable response to suppressive medications in these cases suggests that catamenial anaphylaxis is a heterogeneous disorder in which a number of mechanisms and mediators may play a role. It is an emergent and probably underrecognized entity in the medical literature.