1
|
Paramythiotis D, Tsavdaris D, Karlafti E. Reassessing cholecystectomy timing in gallstone-related acute cholangitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17. [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i5.106473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2025] [Revised: 04/04/2025] [Accepted: 04/22/2025] [Indexed: 05/12/2025] Open
Abstract
In this article, we discussed the article by Sohail et al , published in a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . This study highlights the benefits of performing cholecystectomy (CCY) during the same hospitalization for patients with acute cholangitis (AC) associated with gallstones. Specifically, same-admission CCY is associated with significantly lower 30-day readmission rates compared with interval CCY. Furthermore, it has been associated with reduced mortality rates and reduced recurrence of biliary symptoms. Despite these advantages, the procedure is chosen in only a minority of eligible patients. This gap between evidence and practice highlights the need for updated clinical guidelines and further research to optimize the timing of CCY in the management of AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Paramythiotis
- 1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tsavdaris
- 1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
| | - Eleni Karlafti
- Department of Emergency, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bejaoui I, Maatouk M, Kbir GH, Karoui Y, Essid N, Ben Moussa M. Is Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Safe in Patients with Acute Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones? Results of a Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2025; 35:55-64. [PMID: 39761129 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The traditional method of performing open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE) was replaced by a less invasive procedure known as laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elective surgery. But at present, the application of this technique is considered novel and controversial to treat acute cholangitis (AC). The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with AC. Methods: Studies containing information on patients diagnosed with AC who underwent LCBDE were included. A search for relevant articles was carried out, in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. All studies included in the systematic review were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Results: A total of 10 studies were included. Seven were retrospective and three were prospective. Only one was a randomized controlled trial. There were three studies that compared elective LCBDE and emergency LCBDE. Two studies compared between primary closure and T-tube drainage. Two other studies focused on the comparison between LCBDE and OCBDE. One study examined the comparison of LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Another study addressed the issue of conversion in LCBDE. One study compared early and delayed LCBDE. Conversion rates ranged from 0% to 16.92%. Morbidity ranged from 0% to 26.3%, and mortality ranged from 0% to 3.07%. There was no difference in terms of retained, residual, or recurrent stones, bile leak, hemorrhage, and postoperative pancreatitis, and this, comparing the different groups of patients. Bile duct and intestinal injuries as well as biliary stricture were not common. The average length of hospital stays was approximately 5.86 days, ranging from 2 to 11.12 days. Conclusion: The one-stage urgent LCBDE, while subject to debate, proves to be a secure, feasible, approach for managing nonsevere AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Bejaoui
- A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Maatouk
- A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Ghassen Hamdi Kbir
- A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Yasser Karoui
- A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Nada Essid
- A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mounir Ben Moussa
- A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Toppo S, Gaurav K, Kumar K, Kumar K, Verma S, Tudoo ST, Mehta MK, A P. Assessment of Predictors of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Clinico-Radiological Parameters at a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern India. Cureus 2024; 16:e72512. [PMID: 39606514 PMCID: PMC11599633 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard treatment for gallbladder (GB) stones, favored for its minimally invasive approach. Despite its benefits, the procedure sometimes requires conversion to open cholecystectomy due to intra-operative challenges, with conversion rates varying between 1% and 13%. There are various preoperative predictors that help in identifying such difficult cases and help to proceed safely. This study aims to identify the preoperative factors that could predict the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, thus anticipating the need for conversion to open surgery. METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted at RIMS Ranchi, India, from May 2023 to May 2024, including a total of 93 patients with gallstone disease who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clinical history including age, gender, presence of acute cholecystitis, previous attacks, and previous upper abdominal surgery; biochemical markers including white blood cell (WBC) count, total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and ultrasonographic findings such as GB wall thickness, stone impacted at the neck of GB, contracted or distended GB, presence of pericholecystic fluid collection, Mirizzi's syndrome and others were analyzed to identify predictors of conversion. RESULTS Of the 93 patients included in our study, there were 28 males and 65 females with a ratio of 1:2.3. The age group varied from 14 to 72 years with conversion to open cholecystectomy seen between the age group of 31-70 (mean age 49 years). We observed that 10 patients (conversion rate of 10.75%) underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Significant predictors included acute cholecystitis, multiple previous attacks, and ultrasonographic findings of contracted GB. CONCLUSION Preoperative identification of patients at higher risk for conversion can enhance surgical planning and patient counseling, potentially improving outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Toppo
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Kumar Gaurav
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Kamlesh Kumar
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Krishan Kumar
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Sanjana Verma
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Sunil T Tudoo
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Muklesh K Mehta
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| | - Praveenkumar A
- General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lai W, Xu N. Feasibility and safety of choledochotomy primary closure in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration without biliary drainage: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:22473. [PMID: 38110402 PMCID: PMC10728103 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49173-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Common bile duct (CBD) exploration and T-tube drainage are the main surgical methods for the removal of bile duct stones (BDSs), which can now be completed by laparoscopy. However, the feasibility and safety of primary closure of the CBD (PCCBD) in laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) without biliary drainage are still uncertain. From January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, patients who were diagnosed with BDSs and underwent LCBDE and primary closure of the CBD without biliary drainage in our hospital were included. The clinical and prognostic data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine the feasibility and safety of PCCBD in LCBDE without biliary drainage. Forty-nine patients successfully underwent PCCBD in LCBDE without biliary drainage. The operation time was 158.8 ± 50.3 (90-315,150) minutes, the bile duct suture time was 17.6 ± 4.46 (10-26, 18) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss volume was 70.4 ± 52.6 (5-200, 80) ml, the hospitalization cost was 28,141.2 ± 7011.3 (15,005.45-52,959.34, 26,815.14) CNY Yuan, the hospitalization time was 13.22 ± 5.16 (8-32, 12) days, and the postoperative hospitalization time was 7.31 ± 1.94 (3-15, 7) days. There were 3 cases of postoperative bile leakage (3/49, 6.12%), all of them healed by nonsurgical treatment. During the follow-up of 17.2 ± 11.01 (10-26, 17) months, no residual BDSs, biliary stricture or other complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade I or higher occurred. For some selected patients who meet certain criteria, PCCBD in LCBDE without biliary drainage is feasible and safe and is more conducive to the rapid postoperative recovery of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Lai
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People's Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), High Tech District, No. 18 Wanxiang North Road, Chengdu, 610044, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Nan Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People's Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), High Tech District, No. 18 Wanxiang North Road, Chengdu, 610044, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Huang Y, Shi C, Wang L, Liu S, Zhang J, Wang W. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4869-4877. [PMID: 34724579 PMCID: PMC9160116 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08838-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients with acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDSs). The outcomes after LCBDE with primary closure in patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCBDE with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by CBDSs. METHODS Between June 2015 and June 2020, 368 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 193 patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis underwent LC + LCBDE with primary closure of the CBD (PC group) and 62 patients underwent LC + LCBDE followed by T-tube placement (T-tube group). A total of 113 patients who did not have cholangitis were excluded. The clinical data were compared and analyzed. RESULTS There was no mortality in either group. No significant differences were noted in morbidity, bile leakage rate, retained CBD stones, or readmission rate within 30 days between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the PC group avoided T-tube-related complications and had a shorter operative time (121.12 min vs. 143.37 min) and length of postoperative hospital stay (6.59 days vs. 8.81 days). Moreover, the hospital expenses in the PC group were significantly lower than those in the T-tube group ($4844.47 vs. $5717.22). No biliary stricture occurred during a median follow-up of 18 months in any patient. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in the rate of stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS LCBDE with primary closure is a safe and effective treatment for cholangitis caused by CBDSs. LCBDE with primary closure is not inferior to T-tube drainage for the management of CBDS-related acute cholangitis in suitable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanjun Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China
| | - Youbao Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China
| | - Chunfeng Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China
| | - Linpei Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China
| | - Shengwei Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China
| | - Jiawei Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiang Y, Lu J, Li W, Zhang J, Li L. Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for patients with non-severe acute cholangitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1553-1560. [PMID: 35562540 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02547-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and feasibility of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) have been confirmed in elective settings. However, the suitability of primary closure after LCBDE in the treatment of patients with non-severe acute cholangitis in emergency settings remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to explore the safety and feasibility of LCBDE with primary closure in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis. METHODS Consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with gallbladder stones treated by LCBDE with primary closure at our institution from January 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into two groups: emergency group (patients with non-severe acute cholangitis) and elective group (patients without acute cholangitis). The demographic and perioperative data of the two groups were compared. RESULTS One hundred twenty-two patients received LCBDE combined with primary closure during this period, including 70 in the emergency group and 52 in the elective group. Baseline characteristics were balanced in both groups, except for higher levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and albumin in the emergency group. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. Compared to the elective group, the emergency group had a longer operation time (P = 0.011), and more estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of conversion (2.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.507), use of baskets (84.2% vs. 78.8%, P = 0.481), use of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) (2.9% vs. 1.9%, P = 1.000), or postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.214). The incidence of postoperative complications was comparable between the two groups. During the follow-up period, none of the patients experienced biliary stricture, and 1 case of stone recurrence occurred in the elective group. CONCLUSIONS LCBDE with primary closure for choledocholithiasis patients with non-severe acute cholangitis has the equivalent efficacy and morbidity to elective surgery. Primary closure after LCBDE is a safe and feasible option for choledocholithiasis patients with non-severe acute cholangitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenbo Li
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang Y, Zhang J, Li W, Li L. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis. Updates Surg 2022; 74:899-906. [PMID: 34988916 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01214-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Although the feasibility of T-tube drainage after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been reported, the safety and effectiveness of primary closure (PC) after LCBDE in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis (AC) remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of PC after LCBDE in patients with non-severe AC. Consecutive choledocholithiasis patients with non-severe AC who were treated with a laparoscopic approach at our institution between January 2014 and March 2021 were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups (PC group and T-tube group) based on the way of closure of the common bile duct. The baseline characteristics and perioperative data between the two groups were compared. A total of 230 patients who underwent LCBDE met the inclusion criteria, and there were 94 patients in the PC group and 126 patients in the T-tube group. Baseline data were balanced between the two groups, except that there was less acute cholecystitis in the PC group than in the T-tube group (P = 0.027). Compared to the T-tube group, the PC group had a shorter operation time (P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), less use of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) (P = 0.001), shorter time of drainage removal (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) and residual stones (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion (4.3 vs. 4.4%, P = 1.000), intraoperative transfusion (0.0 vs. 0.7%, P = 1.000), use of basket (71.2 vs. 69.9%, P = 0.816), postoperative bleeding (1.1 vs. 0.7%, P = 1.000), biliary leakage (4.3 vs. 3.7%, P = 1.000), incision infection (1.1 vs. 2.2%, P = 0.649), pneumonia (2.1 vs. 1.4%, P = 1.000), or cholangitis (1.1 vs. 2.9%, P = 0.651). No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. During the follow-up period, no biliary stricture occurred in the two groups, and two patients in the T-tube group were found to have stone recurrence. PC after LCBDE in choledocholithiasis patients with non-severe AC shows superior clinical outcomes to T-tube drainage in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, time of drainage removal, postoperative hospital stay, and residual stones. PC is a safe and feasible treatment for choledocholithiasis patients with non-severe AC after LCBDE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenbo Li
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu B, Luo T, Yang T, Wang S, Meng H, Gong J, Zhou B, Zheng W, Song Z. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is beneficial for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1053-1063. [PMID: 33650005 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08371-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) is considered a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. Whether LCBDE-PC is feasible and beneficial for patients with PUAS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of LCBDE-PC for patients with PUAS. METHODS From June 2011 to September 2019, 1167 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures for choledocholithiasis were reviewed retrospectively. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without PUAS in un-matched and matched cohorts. RESULTS LCBDE-PC was performed successfully in 88.3% of patients with PUAS, and 92.5% of patients without PUAS (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that PUAS was not a risk factor that affected successful performance of LCBDE-PC. Although a higher rate of conversion to open surgery and longer operative time were observed in patients with PUAS, no significant differences were found between patients with and without PUAS in multivariate and propensity score analysis (P > 0.05). A predictive nomogram for LCBDE-PC failure was developed based on potential predictors from the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Successful performance of LCBDE-PC was associated with operative time. A linear regression model for operative time showed impacted stone in the CBD and intraoperative laser use was the most important factor in determining the operative time. CONCLUSION LCBDE-PC is feasible and beneficial for patients with PUAS. However, patients with PUAS with a high possibility of LCBDE-PC failure from the nomogram and a longer operative time from the linear regression model should be cautious when undergoing LCBDE-PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| | - Tingyi Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Tingsong Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Shilin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Hongbo Meng
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Jian Gong
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Bo Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Wenyan Zheng
- Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Zhong Shan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200232, China.
| | - Zhenshun Song
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Olausson M, Westen M, Boilesen AEB, Shabanzadeh DM. Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Common Bile Duct Stones Complicated with Cholangitis in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-Clinical Experience from Three Cases. Obes Surg 2020; 30:5142-5144. [PMID: 32839932 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04947-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Olausson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Surgical Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Westen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Surgical Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Astrid E B Boilesen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Surgical Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Daniel M Shabanzadeh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Surgical Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Gallstone disease is a common and frequently occurring disease in human, and it is the main disease among the digestive system diseases. The incidence of gallstone disease in western countries is about 5%-22%, and common bile duct stones (CBDS) accounts for 8%-20%. CBDS easily lead to biliary obstruction, secondary cholangitis, pancreatitis, and obstructive jaundice, even endanger life. Therefore, it needs timely treatment once diagnosed. The recurrence of choledocholithiasis after bile duct stones clearance involves complicated factors and cannot be completely elaborated by a single factor. The risk factors for recurrence of choledocholithiasis include bacteria, biliary structure, endoscopic and surgical treatment, and inflammation. The modalities for management of choledocholithiasis are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), laparoscopic or open common bile duct exploration, dissolving solutions, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous radiological interventions, electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and laser lithotripsy. We compare the different benefits between surgery and ERCP. And finally, we make a summary of the current strategy for reducing the recurrence of CBDS and future perspectives for CBDS management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sun Qiang
- b Department of General Surgery , Jing'an District Center Hospital of Shanghai (Huashan Hospital Fudan University Jing'an Branch) , Shanghai , PR China
| | - Yin Bao-Bing
- c Department of General Surgery , Huashan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , PR China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
El Nakeeb A, El Geidie A, El Hanafy E, Atef E, Askar W, Sultan AM, Hamdy E, El Shobary M, Hamed H, Abdelrafee A, Zeid MA. Management and Outcome of Borderline Common Bile Duct with Stones: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26:161-7. [PMID: 26828596 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in patients with borderline CBD presents a surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to compare conservative treatment with endoscopic stone extraction for the treatment of borderline CBD with stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective randomized controlled trial includes patients with CBDS in borderline CBD (CBD <10 mm) associated with gallbladder stones who were treated with conservative treatment or endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). The primary outcome was successful CBD clearance. The secondary outcomes were the overall complications, cost, and hospital stay. RESULTS LC and IOC revealed complete clearance of CBDS in 48 (96%) cases in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) group (52% of patients by ERCP, and 44% of patient passed the stone spontaneously), and in the remaining two patients, the CBDS was removed by transcystic exploration. In the conservative group, LC and IOC revealed complete clearance of CBDS in 90% of cases, and in the remaining 10% of patients, the CBDS was removed by transcystic exploration. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is noticed significantly in the ERCP group (2 [4%] versus 8 [16%]; P = .04). The average net cost was significantly higher in the ERCP group. Recurrent biliary symptoms developed significantly in the ERCP group after 1 year (10% versus 0%; P = .02) in the form of recurrent cholangititis and recurrent CBDS. CONCLUSIONS Management of CBDS in patients with borderline CBD represents a surgical challenge. Borderline CBD increases the technical difficulty of ERCP and increases the risk of PEP. Conservative management of CBDS in borderline CBD not only avoids the risks inherent in ERCP and unnecessary preoperative ERCP, but it is also effective in clearing CBDS. The hepatobiliary surgeon should consider a conservative line of treatment in CBDS in borderline CBD in order to decrease the cost and avoid unnecessary ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman El Nakeeb
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed El Geidie
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ehab El Hanafy
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ehab Atef
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Waleed Askar
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmad M Sultan
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Emad Hamdy
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Hosam Hamed
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Abdelrafee
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mostafa Abu Zeid
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhu B, Li D, Ren Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Li K, Amin B, Gong K, Lu Y, Song M, Zhang N. Early versus delayed laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stone-related nonsevere acute cholangitis. Sci Rep 2015; 5:11748. [PMID: 26123122 PMCID: PMC4485235 DOI: 10.1038/srep11748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
It is undetermined when and how laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) should be used in patients with common bile duct (CBD) stone-related nonsevere acute cholangitis. We aimed to evaluate the effect of LCBDE on the clinical outcome of those patients within (early) or beyond (delayed) 72 hours of emergent admission. Surgery-related complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), and total cost, as well as demographic and clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Finally, 3 and 5 patients in early and delayed LCBDE group, respectively, had retained stones, which were removed by choledochoscopy before T-tube was removed. Each group had 3 patients who developed biliary leak, which was conservatively cured by the drainage. Shorter LOS and less total cost were observed in early group compared to the late one (13.34 ± 4.48 vs. 18.32 ± 9.13, p < 0.05; 17712 ± 5446.63 vs. 21776 ± 7230.41 ¥RMB, p < 0.05). Improvement of cholangitis was achieved in all patients with LCBDE. None of the patients developed stricture of the CBD after LCBDE. To conclude, both early and delayed LCBDE are safe and effective for the treatment of CBD stone-related nonsevere acute cholangitis during emergent admissions. Early LCBDE may be superior to delayed procedure due to the shorter LOS and less cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhu
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Dan Li
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Yu Ren
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Ying Li
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Yan Wang
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Kai Li
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Buhe Amin
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Ke Gong
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Yiping Lu
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| | - Ming Song
- Department of medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, US
| | - Nengwei Zhang
- Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Department of General Surgery of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Tieyilu 10, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledocolithotomy with primary suture for lithiasis (with video). J Visc Surg 2015; 152:133-4. [PMID: 25748695 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
14
|
Hua J, Lin S, Qian D, He Z, Zhang T, Song Z. Primary closure and rate of bile leak following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. Dig Surg 2015; 32:1-8. [PMID: 25613528 DOI: 10.1159/000368326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Accepted: 09/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Choledocholithiasis is traditionally managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or T-tube insertion following common bile duct exploration. This study examined the efficacy and safety of primary duct closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) via choledochotomy. METHODS Between September 2011 and September 2013, 157 consecutive patients underwent LCBDE via choledochotomy. RESULTS Of 157 LCBDE procedures, 138 (87.9%) were successfully completed with primary closure of the choledochotomy. Eight patients (5.1%) underwent closure with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy and 11 patients (7.0%) were converted to open surgery. The biliary tree was free of stones at the end of surgery in 154 patients (98.1%). Postoperative bile leak occurred in 6 patients (3.8%). The median follow-up period was 18 (2-33) months, with no evidence of further bile duct stones or bile duct stricture in any patients. Univariable analysis revealed that successful duct clearance (p = 0.010) and diameter of the common bile duct (p < 0.001) were two significant risk factors for bile leak. CONCLUSIONS Primary duct closure following LCBDE is effective and safe for the management of choledocholithiasis. The postoperative bile leak rate may be low in skilled laparoscopic surgeons with a careful selection of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Hua
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
El Nakeeb A, Sultan AM, Hamdy E, El Hanafy E, Atef E, Salah T, El Geidie AA, Kandil T, El Shobari M, El Ebidy G. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: A useful tool in the hands of the hepatobiliary surgeon. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:609-615. [PMID: 25605984 PMCID: PMC4296022 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Revised: 06/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for patients with gall bladder stones (GS) and common bile duct stones (CBDS).
METHODS: Patients treated for GS with CBDS were included. LC and intraoperative transcystic cholangiogram (TCC) were performed in most of the cases. Intraoperative ERCP was done for cases with proven CBDS.
RESULTS: Eighty patients who had GS with CBDS were included. LC was successful in all cases. Intraoperative TCC revealed passed CBD stones in 4 cases so intraoperative ERCP was performed only in 76 patients. Intraoperative ERCP showed dilated CBD with stones in 64 cases (84.2%) where removal of stones were successful; passed stones in 6 cases (7.9%); short lower end stricture with small stones present in two cases (2.6%) which were treated by removal of stones with stent insertion; long stricture lower 1/3 CBD in one case (1.3%) which was treated by open hepaticojejunostomy; and one case (1.3%) was proved to be ampullary carcinoma and whipple’s operation was scheduled.
CONCLUSION: The hepatobiliary surgeon should be trained on ERCP as the third hand to expand his field of therapeutic options.
Collapse
|
16
|
Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Kiadaliri AA, Skordis-Worrall J. Do economic evaluation studies inform effective healthcare resource allocation in Iran? A critical review of the literature. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2014; 12:15. [PMID: 25050084 PMCID: PMC4105166 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-12-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
To aid informed health sector decision-making, data from sufficient high quality economic evaluations must be available to policy makers. To date, no known study has analysed the quantity and quality of available Iranian economic evaluation studies. This study aimed to assess the quantity, quality and targeting of economic evaluation studies conducted in the Iranian context. The study systematically reviewed full economic evaluation studies (n = 30) published between 1999 and 2012 in international and local journals. The findings of the review indicate that although the literature on economic evaluation in Iran is growing, these evaluations were of poor quality and suffer from several major methodological flaws. Furthermore, the review reveals that economic evaluation studies have not addressed the major health problems in Iran. While the availability of evidence is no guarantee that it will be used to aid decision-making, the absence of evidence will certainly preclude its use. Considering the deficiencies in the data identified by this review, current economic evaluations cannot be a useful source of information for decision makers in Iran. To improve the quality and overall usefulness of economic evaluations we would recommend; 1) developing clear national guidelines for the conduct of economic evaluations, 2) highlighting priority areas where information from such studies would be most useful and 3) training researchers and policy makers in the calculation and use of economic evaluation data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aliasghar Ahmad Kiadaliri
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences-Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ; Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jolene Skordis-Worrall
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK ; Department for Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bencini L, Tommasi C, Manetti R, Farsi M. Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6:32-40. [PMID: 24567790 PMCID: PMC3930888 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i2.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2013] [Revised: 01/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/15/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallstones and common bile duct calculi are found to be associated in 8%-20% of patients, leading to possible life-threatening complications, such as acute biliary pancreatitis, jaundice and cholangitis. The gold standard of care for gallbladder calculi and isolated common bile duct stones is represented by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, respectively, while a debate still exists regarding how to treat the two diseases at the same time. Many therapeutic options are also available when the two conditions are associated, including many different types of treatment, which local professionals often administer. The need to limit maximum discomfort and risks for the patients, combined with the economic pressure of reducing costs and utilizing resources, favors single-step procedures. However, a multitude of data fail to strongly demonstrate the superiority of any technique (including a two or multi-step approach), while rigorous clinical trials that include so many different types of treatment are still lacking, and it is most likely unrealistic to conduct them in the future. Therefore, the choice of the best management is often led by the local presence of professional expertise and resources, rather than by a real superiority of one strategy over another.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhu B, Wang Y, Gong K, Lu Y, Ren Y, Hou X, Song M, Zhang N. Comparison of emergent versus elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with or without nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones. J Surg Res 2013; 187:72-6. [PMID: 24398306 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2013] [Revised: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 11/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has already been established for the treatment of patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) in elective situations. However, the effect of emergent LCBDE on those patients with nonsevere acute cholangitis has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of emergent LCBDE on patients with nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with CBDS. METHODS Seventy-two patients with CBDS admitted from January 2009 to December 2012 were included for this retrospective study. LCBDE of transductal approach for CBDS was performed to all patients. Thirty-seven patients underwent emergent LCBDE for nonsevere acute cholangitis and 35 patients underwent elective LCBDE. Duration of the procedure, complications, retained stone of bile duct, hospital stay, and total charges were compared between the two groups. In addition, the characteristics of patients underwent emergent LCBDE were also compared before and after surgery. RESULTS There was no significant difference with regard to the diameter of common bile duct and number of CBDS from imaging and/or operative findings between the two groups. There was no conversion to open common bile duct exploration, no major bile duct injuries, and no mortality in both the group of patients. There was no significant difference in patients with or without acute or chronic cholecystitis, duration of surgery, overall hospital stay (16.41 ± 1.03 versus 14.54 ± 0.94, P > 0.05), and total charges (18,603 ± 1774.64 versus 14,951 ± 1257.09 Yuan in renminbi, P > 0.05) between the two groups. Four cases with retained stones were found in patients with emergent LCBDE and two in elective LCBDE patients. There were four cases of biliary leak in patients with emergent LCBDE and three cases in elective LCBDE group, respectively. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The biliary leak was cured postoperatively after drainage. Control of septic symptoms was achieved in all patients after emergent LCBDE. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicated that emergent LCBDE is as safe and effective as elective LCBDE for the treatment of patients with nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with CBDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Gong
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yiping Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Ren
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaopu Hou
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Song
- Department of medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Nengwei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tommasi C, Bencini L, Bernini M, Naspetti R, Cavallina G, Manetti R, Talamucci L, Farsi M. Routine use of simultaneous laparoendoscopic approach in patients with confirmed gallbladder and bile duct stones: fit for laparoscopy fit for "rendezvous". World J Surg 2013; 37:999-1005. [PMID: 23430003 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1962-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present work was to determine the feasibility and efficacy, in terms of equipment coordination and timing, of the laparoendoscopic intraoperative rendezvous technique (RVT) for the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones (CBDS). METHODS The procedure was considered in 269 unselected patients with a suspicion or preoperative imaging demonstration of CBDS who were fit for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Common bile duct stones were confirmed by intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography (IOC) in only 113 of these patients (42 %). In 17 (15 %) patients the planned procedure was aborted because of organizational problems, mainly the unavailability of endoscopists in the urgent setting. The remaining 96 patients (84 %) underwent a formal attempt at RVT. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) was performed, during LC, by means of a guidewire that reached the duodenum through the cystic duct. RESULTS In 18 patients (19 %) the complete procedure failed, either because of difficulty in passing the guidewire through the papilla or because of other technical difficulties that required conversion to laparotomy. An intraoperative ERC was completed in six patients in the classical way (no guidewire) without conversion. No mortality and few complications were recorded (3 % overall: 1 perforation and 2 cholangitis). Retained stones were successively detected in 6 patients (6 %) and successfully retreated by a further ERC. Globally, the one-stage procedure (with and without the guidewire) was possible in 84 of 96 patients (87 %). CONCLUSIONS The RVT appears to be effective and safe as it was performed at our institution, with an overall percentage of definitive success (passed guide wire and no further ERC) of 81 %. The RVT should be considered as a good option for the treatment of simultaneous gallstones and CBDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Tommasi
- Surgical Oncology, Surgical and Flexible Endoscopic Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ding YB, Deng B, Liu XN, Wu J, Xiao WM, Wang YZ, Ma JM, Li Q, Ju ZS. Synchronous vs sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:2080-2086. [PMID: 23599628 PMCID: PMC3623986 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i13.2080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2012] [Revised: 01/04/2013] [Accepted: 01/11/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare synchronous laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and sequential LC combined with EST for treating cholecystocholedocholithiasis. METHODS A total of 150 patients were included and retrospectively studied. Among these, 70 were selected for the synchronous operation, in which the scheme was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with EST during LC. The other 80 patients were selected for the sequential operation, in which the scheme involved first cutting the papillary muscle under endoscopy and then performing LC. The indexes in the two groups, including the operation time, the success rate, the incidence of complications, and the length of the hospital stay, were observed. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the numbers of patients, sex distribution, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, serum bilirubin, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, mean diameter of common bile duct stones, and previous medical and surgical history (P = 0.54, P = 0.18, P = 0.52, P = 0.22, P = 0.32, P = 0.42, P = 0.68, P = 0.70, P = 0.47 and P = 0.57). There was no significant difference in the surgical operation time between the two groups (112.1 ± 30.8 min vs 104.9 ± 18.2 min). Compared with the sequential operation group, the incidence of pancreatitis was lower (1.4% vs 6.3%), the incidence of hyperamylasemia (1.4% vs 10.0%, P < 0.05) was significantly reduced, and the length of the hospital stay was significantly shortened in the synchronous operation group (3 d vs 4.5 d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION For treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis, synchronous LC combined with EST reduces incidence of complications, decreases length of hospital stay, simplifies the surgical procedure, and reduces operation time.
Collapse
|
21
|
Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2010; 25:1230-7. [PMID: 20844893 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1348-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Accepted: 08/23/2010] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ERCP remains the prevailing method of treating CBDS; however, its ideal timing in respect to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is not defined. LC combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES) was compared with preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (PES) followed by LC for management of preoperatively known cholecystocholedocholithiasis. METHODS Between June 2006 and September 2009, 198 patients diagnosed preoperatively by clinical assessment, liver chemistry, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to have combined choledochocystolithiasis were eligible. They were randomly divided into two groups: PES/LC group (n = 100) and LC/IOES group (n = 98). The surgical times, surgical success rates, number of stone extractions, postoperative complications, retained common bile duct stones, and postoperative lengths of stay were compared prospectively. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, surgical success rate, CBD diameter, stone size, or stone number between the two groups. The success rate was 95.3% and 97.8% for PES/LC and LC/IOES, respectively. There were no significant difference in postoperative retained stones, surgical time, and complications, but the total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LC/IOES group. CONCLUSIONS PES/LC and LC/IOES are both good options for dealing with preoperatively diagnosed CBDS, but when there is enough experience and facilities, LC/IOES, as a single-stage treatment, would be preferable.
Collapse
|
22
|
Gholipour C, Fakhree MBA, Shalchi RA, Abbasi M. Prediction of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery with artificial neural networks. BMC Surg 2009; 9:13. [PMID: 19698100 PMCID: PMC2745364 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2008] [Accepted: 08/21/2009] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The intent of this study was to predict conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to open surgery employing artificial neural networks (ANN). Methods The retrospective data of 793 patients who underwent LC in a teaching university hospital from 1997 to 2004 was collected. We employed linear discrimination analysis and ANN models to examine the predictability of the conversion. The models were validated using prospective data of 100 patients who underwent LC at the same hospital. Results The overall conversion rate was 9%. Conversion correlated with experience of surgeons, emergency LC, previous abdominal surgery, fever, leukocytosis, elevated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels, and ultrasonographic detection of common bile duct stones. In the validation group, discriminant analysis formula diagnosed the conversion in 5 cases out of 9 (sensitivity: 56%; specificity: 82%); the ANN model diagnosed 6 cases (sensitivity: 67%; specificity: 99%). Conclusion The conversion of LC to open surgery is effectively predictable based on the preoperative health characteristics of patients using ANN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changiz Gholipour
- Department of General Surgery, Sinaea Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz, Iran.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2009; 2009:840208. [PMID: 19672460 PMCID: PMC2722154 DOI: 10.1155/2009/840208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2009] [Accepted: 05/25/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Common bile duct stones (CBDSs) may occur in up to 3%–14.7% of all patients for whom cholecystectomy is preformed. Patients presenting with CBDS have symptoms including: biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or may be asymptomatic. It is important to distinguish between primary and secondary stones, because the treatment approach varies. Stones found before, during, and after cholecystectomy had also differing treatments. Different methods have been used for the treatment of CBDS but the suitable therapy depends on conditions such as patient' satisfaction, number and size of stones, and the surgeons experience in laparoscopy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration (transcystic or transcholedochal), or laparotomy with CBD exploration (by T-tube, C-tube insertion, or primary closure) are the most commonly used methods managing CBDS. We will review the pathophysiology of CBDS, diagnosis, and different techniques of treatment with especial focus on the various surgical modalities.
Collapse
|
24
|
Chalkoo M, Masoodi I, Hussain S, Chalkoo S, Farooq O. Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct and removal of dead worm in a patient of cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failure. J Minim Access Surg 2009; 5:82-84. [PMID: 20040804 PMCID: PMC2822177 DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.58504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2008] [Accepted: 06/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe a dead ascaris-induced extrahepatic bilary obstruction in a young female who presented with acute cholangitis. The dead ascaris was removed by laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failure. Patient had an uneventful hospital course after the procedure and was discharged afebrile after 3 days of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushtaq Chalkoo
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, SMHS and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, State, India
| | - Ibrahim Masoodi
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, SMHS and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, State, India
| | - Shabnum Hussain
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, SMHS and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, State, India
| | - Shaheena Chalkoo
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, SMHS and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, State, India
| | - Omar Farooq
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, SMHS and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, State, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li LB, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Wei Q. Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: Experiences with 39 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14:3081-4. [PMID: 18494063 PMCID: PMC2712179 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.3081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of biliary tract reoperation by laparoscopy for the patients with retained or recurrent stones who failed in endoscopic sphincterotomy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data obtained from attempted laparoscopic reoperation for 39 patients in a single institution was performed, examining open conversion rates, operative times, complications, and hospital stay.
RESULTS: Out of the 39 cases, 38 (97%) completed laparoscopy, 1 required conversion to open operation because of difficulty in exposing the common bile duct. The mean operative time was 135 min. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 4 d. Procedures included laparoscopic residual gallbladder resection in 3 cases, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary duct closure at choledochotomy in 13 cases, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochotomy with T tube drainage in 22 cases. Duodenal perforation occurred in 1 case during dissection and was repaired laparoscopically. Retained stones were found in 2 cases. Postoperative asymptomatic hyperamylasemia occurred in 3 cases. There were no complications due to port placement, postoperative bleeding, bile or bowel leakage and mortality. No recurrence or formation of duct stricture was observed during a mean follow-up period of 18 mo.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic biliary tract reoperation is safe and feasible if it is performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, and is an alternative choice for patients with choledocholithiasis who fail in endoscopic sphincterectomy.
Collapse
|