1
|
Esposito C, Masieri L, Di Mento C, Cerulo M, Del Conte F, Coppola V, Esposito G, Tedesco F, Chiodi A, Carraturo F, Guglielmini R, Alicchio F, Borrelli M, Continisio L, Escolino M. Seven years of pediatric robotic-assisted surgery: insights from 105 procedures. J Robot Surg 2025; 19:157. [PMID: 40232570 PMCID: PMC12000270 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02257-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has recently expanded its role in pediatric patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 105 cases over 7 years (2017-2024) to evaluate outcomes, efficiency, and training experiences. A total of 105 children (58 boys, 47 girls) aged 2-15 years underwent robotic-assisted procedures using the Da Vinci Xi system. The most common indications were ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 33), varicocele (n = 29), and primary obstructive megaureter (n = 16). Two senior surgeons performed the procedures, training seven junior surgeons via the dual-console system. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests for docking time and operative duration comparisons, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Docking time significantly improved over time from 45 to 15 min (median 25 min) (p = 0.001). The total operative time significantly decreased over time (p = 0.001), with a median of 125 min (range 50-250). Robotic system-related issues were reported in 3/105 (2.8%). Conversion to laparoscopy was necessary in 1 (0.9%). Postoperative complications (Clavien grade 3b) occurred in 2/105 (1.8%) patients, requiring reintervention. The median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-7). Monthly case volume increased from 1-2 to 4-7. Our 7 year experience with pediatric RAS demonstrates its safety, effectiveness, and growing role, especially in pediatric urology. It offers ergonomic advantages and facilitates training but is still limited by cost, larger instrument size (8 mm), and longer setup times compared to laparoscopy. Future developments, such as smaller robotic instruments and single-port technology, may help overcome these limitations and expand the applicability of RAS to younger and smaller patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Esposito
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Urology Unit, Meyer University Hospital Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Di Mento
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariapina Cerulo
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Fulvia Del Conte
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Coppola
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giorgia Esposito
- Internal Medicine Unit, Federico II University Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Tedesco
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Chiodi
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Carraturo
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Guglielmini
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Micaela Borrelli
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Ruggi D'Aragona Hospital, Salerno, Italy
| | - Leonardo Continisio
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Escolino
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Naples, Via Pansini, 5 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bindi E, Cobellis G, 't Hoen LA, Lammers RJM, O'Kelly F, Dönmez Mİ, Baydilli N, Haid B, Marco BB, Atwa A, Madarriaga YQ, Masieri L, Sforza S. Has robot-assisted pyeloplasty reached outcome parity with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children <15 kg? A Paediatric YAU international multi-center study. J Pediatr Urol 2024; 20:1154-1159. [PMID: 39307658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO), is a major cause of pathological hydronephrosis in children. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), has gained popularity due to its known advantages. LP faces technical difficulties and a steep learning curve. RALP has overcome these limitations, making it safer and more effective for children. The study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of LP and RALP in infants weighing ≤15 kg. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis (2010-2022). The study included pediatric patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of UPJO and weighed ≤15 kg. The patients were divided into two groups: LP and RALP. The study evaluated preoperative, intraoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data, including complications. Success was defined as no worsening of hydronephrosis on postoperative ultrasound in the first year of follow-up. RESULTS The total patients were 94: 42 in the LP group, and 52 in the RALP group. The median age at the intervention was 17.5 months (LAP group) versus 29 months (RALP group) (p = 0.01). The median weight at the time of intervention was 9.5 Kg (LP group), and 11.6 Kg (RALP group) (p = 0.44). The median operative time was significantly longer in the LP group: 245 min versus 125.5 min in the RALP group (p = 0.001). The median length of hospitalization was comparable: 4.3 days (LP group) and 3.5 days (RALP group) (p = 0.42). No intraoperative complications were reported in either group. There were no statistically significant differences regarding postoperative complications. During follow-up, all patients remained asymptomatic, with no episodes of urinary tract infection or abdominal pain, and none of them had a recurrence of UPJ obstruction. Consequently, the two techniques are equally effective and safe in the short term. DISCUSSION Both procedures offer excellent outcomes with comparable postoperative complications. LOS was similar for both groups, with no intraoperative complications or conversions, and a non-significant increase in postoperative complications. A notable finding was the significant difference in operation times between the procedures, emphasizing the importance of reduced surgical time in pediatric patients for minimizing anesthetic and intubation durations. CONCLUSION For the absence of intra- and postoperative complications and recurrences, RALP is as effective as LP in pyeloplasty in children weighing 15 kg or less. This finding reinforces the idea that RALP can be safely executed, benefiting from its advanced technology and the learning curve, for patients of any age regarding pyeloplasty for UPJO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Bindi
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Salesi Children's Hospital, Ancona, Italy; Università Politecnica of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Cobellis
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Salesi Children's Hospital, Ancona, Italy; Università Politecnica of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lisette Aimee 't Hoen
- Department of Paediatric Urology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Fardod O'Kelly
- Division of Paediatric Urology, Beacon Hospital, University College Dublin, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Muhammet İrfan Dönmez
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Numan Baydilli
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Bernhard Haid
- Department of Paediatric Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz Hospital of the Sisters of Charity Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Ahmed Atwa
- Pediatric Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Department of Paediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Sforza
- Department of Paediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Puri P, Friedmacher F, Farrugia MK, Sharma S, Esposito C, Mattoo TK. Primary vesicoureteral reflux. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2024; 10:75. [PMID: 39389958 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00560-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common urological abnormalities in infants and children. The association of VUR, urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal parenchymal damage is well established. The most serious complications of VUR-associated reflux nephropathy are hypertension and proteinuria with chronic kidney disease. Over the past two decades, our understanding of the natural history of VUR has improved, which has helped to identify patients at increased risk of both VUR and VUR-associated renal injury. The main goals in the treatment of paediatric patients with VUR are the prevention of recurrent UTIs and minimizing the risk of renal scarring and long-term renal impairment. Currently, there are four options for managing primary VUR in infants and children: surveillance or intermittent treatment of UTIs with management of bladder and bowel dysfunction; continuous antibiotic prophylaxis; endoscopic subureteral injection of tissue-augmenting substances; and ureteral reimplantation via open, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgery. Current debates regarding key aspects of management include when to perform diagnostic imaging and how to best identify the paediatric patients that will benefit from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis or surgical intervention, including endoscopic injection therapy and minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation. Evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, have the potential to assist clinicians in the decision-making process and in the individualization of diagnostic imaging and treatment of infants and children with VUR in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prem Puri
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Florian Friedmacher
- Department of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marie-Klaire Farrugia
- Department of Paediatric Urology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (West London Children's Healthcare), London, UK
- Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Shilpa Sharma
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ciro Esposito
- Division of Paediatric Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Tej K Mattoo
- Departments of Paediatrics (Nephrology) and Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wong YS, Lo KL, Pang KKY, Tam YH. A combined approach of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and flexible endoscopy to treat concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction and calyceal stones in children: Technical considerations and review of the literature. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1017722. [PMID: 36389392 PMCID: PMC9650079 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1017722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of children with concomitant ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and calyceal stones remains challenging. The various treatment options available for pediatric nephrolithiasis may require multiple sessions, and the techniques by themselves are not designed for simultaneous correction of UPJ obstruction. Recently, success in combining robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and flexible endoscopy has been reported by multi-institutional studies to treat children with concomitant UPJ obstruction and renal stones. Given the paucity of technical details of this novel approach in the existing literature, we herein report our techniques to treat two girls aged 6 and 10 years who had concomitant UPJ obstruction and multiple stones in mid- and lower poles calyces. Three robotic ports were used without any assistant ports. A flexible endoscope, either a cystoscope or a single-use ureteroscope, was introduced via the undocked epigastric port to perform nephroscopy and stones removal after the renal pelvis was opened. The rest of the RALP was completed in the usual manner. Technical modifications were employed to facilitate the flexible endoscope to examine the entire calyceal system. Both patients underwent successful surgical procedures by the combined approach without any intra- or post-operative complications. Three and 14 stones were removed from each of the patients respectively. Postoperative investigations demonstrated successful correction of UPJ obstruction and complete stone clearance in both patients. A combined approach of RALP and flexible endoscopy is a safe and effective technique to treat concurrent UPJ obstruction and calyceal stones in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuenshan Sammi Wong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ka Lun Lo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kristine Kit Yi Pang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yuk Him Tam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|