Measuring What Matters: Beyond Quality Performance Measures in Caring for Adults with Obesity

Quality Measurement Gaps and Future Directions in the Assessment of Obesity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The disease of obesity continues to increase in prevalence and severity yet obesity care, treatment, and coverage are scarce. Progress has been made in the development and implementation of quality measures in clinical practice and organizational performance. However, major gaps and limitations exist in the context of measuring guideline-based clinical care for obesity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity quality measures have entered various stages of testing and development, but only a select few are included in reporting and payment programs. One process measure for adults, "Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Plan" is used in Medicare. One process measure for pediatrics, "Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity in Children and Adolescence" is used in Medicare, health insurance plans, and Medicaid. No outcome or digital quality measure exists for the disease of obesity. One quality measure development project is underway that is testing the performance of four measures, including outcome measures for obesity. The general absence of quality measures for obesity means that there are no objective measures to address the quality of obesity care or its outcome. More meaningful efforts are needed to seriously integrate obesity with quality performance measurement and value in healthcare payment programs.

Weight-biased attitudes about pediatric patients with obesity in Dutch healthcare professionals from seven different professions

Little is known about the prevalence of negative weight-biased attitudes among Dutch healthcare professionals (HCPs) when treating children and adolescents with obesity and whether interdisciplinary differences are present. Accordingly, we asked Dutch HCPs that treat pediatric patients with obesity to complete a validated 22-item self-report questionnaire about their weight-biased attitudes. In total, 555 HCPs participated from seven different disciplines: 41 general practitioners (GPs), 40 pediatricians, 132 youth healthcare physicians, 223 youth healthcare nurses, 40 physiotherapists, 40 dieticians, and 39 mental health professionals. HCPs from all disciplines reported to experience negative weight-biased attitudes among themselves. Pediatricians and GPs scored highest on negative weight-biased attitudes, including frustrations in treating children with obesity, and feeling less confident and prepared to treat children with obesity. Dieticians scored the least negative weight-biased attitudes. Participants from all groups perceived weight bias expressed by their colleagues, toward children with obesity. These findings are comparable to results reported by adult HCPs from other countries. Interdisciplinary differences were found and underscore the need for more research on contributing factors that impact explicit weight bias among pediatric HCPs.

Building Successful Models in Primary Care to Improve the Management of Adult Patients with Obesity

Although several obesity clinical practice guidelines are available and relevant for primary care, a practical and effective medical model for treating obesity is necessary. The aim of this study was to develop and implement a holistic population health-based framework with components to support primary care-based obesity management in US health care organizations. The Obesity Care Model Collaborative (OCMC) was conducted with guidance and expertise of an advisory committee, which selected participating health care organizations based on prespecified criteria. A committee comprising obesity and quality improvement specialists and representatives from each organization developed and refined the obesity care framework for testing and implementing guideline-based practical interventions targeting obesity. These interventions were tracked over time, from an established baseline to 18 months post implementation. Ten geographically diverse organizations, treating patients with diverse demographics, insurance coverage, and health status, participated in the collaborative. The key interventions identified for managing obesity in primary care were applicable across the 4 OCMC framework domains: community, health care organization, care team, and patient/family. Care model components were developed within each domain to guide the primary care of obesity based on each organization's structure, resources, and culture. Key interventions included development of quality monitoring systems, training of leadership and staff, identifying clinical champions, patient education, electronic health record best practice alerts, and establishment of community partnerships, including the identification of external resources. This article describes the interventions developed based on the framework, with a focus on implementation of the model and lessons learned.