Evaluation of a novel automated protocol for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus G-CSF using the Fresenius AS104 cell separator

Five-year Experience in PBSC Collection: Results of the Catholic University of Rome

Several authors have reported a faster immunological and hemopoietic post- transplant reconstitution using autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) than using autologous bone marrow stem cells. A large number of PBSC can be collected by leukapheresis during the hematological recovery after induction or salvage chemotherapy. In our experience we demonstrated that several separators, even if they have different results in mononuclear cell (MNC) yields, red blood cell and platelet contaminations, are able to collect PBSC for autotransplantation in patients with several malignant diseases and different status of disease. Eighty three patients were submitted to 590 leukapheresis procedures using 4 different blood cell separators: the results showed that all employed protocols are efficient in the collection of peripheral MNC even if after the widespread use of granulocytecolony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the harvesting phase, the blood cell separator efficiency in terms of MNC is reduced. The use of GCSF in combination with other growth factors, during chemotherapy mobilization could simplify, in the future, this therapeutical program even if improvements in the efficiency of PBSC collection protocols are required.

Accurate prediction of autologous stem cell apheresis yields using a double variable-dependent method assures systematic efficiency control of continuous flow collection procedures

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stem cell collection is a standard procedure for the procurement of autologous grafts to rescue myelosuppression induced by high-dose treatments. Accurate prediction of collection yields may contribute to optimize planning and quality control of collection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 313 autologous haematopoietic stem cell (AHSC) evaluable collections performed in 208 patients with haematologic and non-haematologic neoplasms from seven centres were prospectively analysed to test the accuracy of yield predictions generated by a formula that required the input of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell precount and desired PB volume to be processed. Data were matched in a standard linear regression, in a zero-point regression analysis and tested for prediction accuracy. Further 165 AHSC collections were analysed on a single-centre basis, using yield predictions as reference standards.

RESULTS

Analysis showed high levels of correlation between measured collection yields (my) and predictions (py) (R = 0.85; P = 0.000000) as well as high degree of prediction accuracy (my vs. py at paired t-test: P = 0.114781; median my/py ratio = 1.23). Analysis of additional 165 AHSC collections on a single-centre basis showed that the analysed centres had 70% or more measured yields comprising the 0.6-1.8 interval of the my/py ratio. The observance of the 'efficiency' my/py interval assured collection quality control in these centres confirming the reliability of the method.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction method generates accurate and immediate yield predictions allowing collection planning and rapid efficiency control. As a consequence of our study, four centres out of seven use the described method to plan both leukapheresis number and single-procedure blood processing volume while the remaining three centres plan leukapheresis number on the basis of our predictions, maintaining a fixed single-procedure 200 ml/kg blood volume processing, according to their centre AHSC collection policy.

High-dose chemotherapy as a consolidation approach in advanced ovarian cancer: long-term results

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term impact of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as consolidation in a large series (n = 55) of advanced chemosensitive ovarian cancer patients who were optimally cytoreduced at time of first surgery or at interval debulking surgery (IDS). HDC consisted of carboplatin (600 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2), etoposide (450 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2) and melphalan (50 mg/m(2), days 3 and 4). The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). In September 2000 the overall population had a median follow-up of 55 months (range 17--137) and a TTP of 35 months with a 5-year TTP rate of 35% (CI 95%: 21--49) whereas OS averaged 75 months with a 5-year OS of 59% (CI 95%: 45--73). In patients achieving optimal primary cytoreduction the median TTP was 44 months with a 5-year rate of 43% (CI 95%: 26--60). In the same series the 5-year OS rate was 62% (CI 95%: 45--79) (median OS = 75 months). In patients who were optimally cytoreduced at the time of IDS the median TTP was 25 months and the 5-year TTP rate was 22% (CI 95%: 3--41) and median OS was 46 months with a 5-year OS rate of 50% (CI 95%: 27--73). HDC with hematopoietic support could represent an effective approach for the treatment of advanced optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer patients with chemosensitive disease. Patients who underwent IDS because of unresectable tumors at the time of first surgery had the greater survival benefit from HDC.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND

The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery.

RESULTS

The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.

Adjustment of the interface detector (location 71) to the absolute number of mononuclear cells in the peripheral blood: no improvement of the collection efficiency of the Fenwal CS3000 plus during progenitor cell harvests

Improvement of the collection efficiency (CE) of the Fenwal CS3000 plus in collecting circulating progenitor cells (CPC) might diminish the number of leukapheresis procedures (LP) required to obtain the CPC required to assure engraftment. We analyzed whether adjustment of the optical setting (location 71,L71) to the number of MNC present in the peripheral blood could enhance the CE of the MNC. Thirty-five patients underwent 121 LP with an adjusted L71. We compared the results retrospectively with 26 LP performed with a fixed L71 (1:100) in 12 patients. The CPC were mobilized with chemotherapy followed by subcutaneous administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in both groups. Adjustment of the L71 did neither improve the CE of the MNC, the estimated CE of CD34+ cells nor diminished granulocyte contamination. For the total 121 LP with an adjusted L71 and for the total 26 LP with a fixed L71 the mean CE of MNC were, respectively, 44.6 +/- 18.3% and 46.4 +/- 14%. The mean granulocyte contamination, determined by manual white blood cell differentiation, was 1.7 +/- 2.3% for the adjusted L71 group and 2.3 +/- 3 for the fixed L71 group. There was no difference in the median number of LP required to obtain 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg between both groups. We found a weak significant correlation between WBC and pre-LP MNC count and the CE of MNC (r = 0.36, P = 0.012, resp.r = 0.33, P = 0.023), but no correlation between the CE of MNC and the estimated CE of CD34+ cells (r = 0.24, P = 0.113). In conclusion, adjustment of the L71 to the MNC did not improve the CE of MNC of the Fenwal CS3000. The lack of correlation between the CE and MNC and the estimated CE of CD34+ cells should be further explored.

Evaluation of a new protocol for peripheral blood stem cell collection with the Fresenius AS 104 cell separator

In this report we analyzed sixty leukapheresis procedures on 35 patients with a new protocol for the Fresenius AS 104. Yields and efficiencies for MNC, CD 34+ cells, and CFU-GM indicate that the new protocol is able to collect large quantities of hemopoietic progenitors. Procedures were performed processing 8.69 +/- 2.8 liters of whole blood per apheresis and modifying 3 parameters: spillover-volume 7 ml, buffy-coat volume 11.5 ml, centrifuge speed 1,500 rpm; blood flow rate was 50 ml/min and the anticoagulant ratio was 1:12. No side effects were observed during apheresis procedures except for transient paresthesia episodes promptly resolved with the administration of calcium gluconate. Yields show a high capacity of the new program to collect on average MNC 17.28 +/- 10.85 x 10(9), CD 34+ 471 +/- 553.5 x 10(6) and CFU-GM 1278.7 +/- 1346.3 x 10(4) per procedure. Separator collection efficiency on average was 49.91 +/- 23.28% for MNC, 55.1 +/- 35.66% for CFU-GM, and 62.97 +/- 23.09% for CD 34+ cells. Particularly interesting are results for MNC yields and CD 34+ efficiency; these results make the new program advantageous or similar to the most progressive blood cell separators and capable to collect a sufficient number of progenitor cells for a graft with a mean of 1.80 +/- 0.98 procedures per patient.

Erythropoietin addition to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor abrogates life-threatening neutropenia and increases peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: results of a randomized comparison

PURPOSE AND METHODS

The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) treatment was compared in a randomized fashion with that of G-CSF treatment alone in promoting hematologic recovery and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent their first course of epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy during a phase II study of intensive outpatient ETP chemotherapy followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) late intensification with PBPC support.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of hematologic recovery of 50 randomized patients, after ETP chemotherapy, showed that life-threatening neutropenia occurred in 88% of the patients treated with G-CSF alone, whereas it occurred in only 4% of patients treated with G-CSF + EPO. Significantly different WBC and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) counts were observed in the two distinct arms on the day of WBC nadir (P <.0001 and P <.0001, respectively). Moreover, the addition of EPO to G-CSF increased PBPC mobilization and collection as compared with that in G-CSF-treated patients (P =.0009 and P =.0026, respectively), who required a significantly higher number of leukaphereses than G-CSF + EPO-treated patients (P =.0076) to obtain the planned minimum dose of PBPCs. Qualitative analysis by cloning assay of PBPCs collected in both arms revealed that G-CSF- and G-CSF + EPO-mobilized PBPCs have comparable in vitro functional properties.

CONCLUSION

This randomized comparison revealed that EPO significantly increases most of the hematologic effect produced by G-CSF administration after chemotherapy. This biologic property of EPO translated in vivo into a global improvement of patients' hematologic status.

Expansion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/chemotherapy-mobilized CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors: role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/erythropoietin hybrid protein (MEN11303) and interleukin-15

Ex vivo stroma-free static liquid cultures of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/chemotherapy-mobilized CD34+ cells were established from patients with epithelial solid tumors. Different culture conditions were generated by adding G-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), Flt3 ligand (Flt3), megakaryocyte growth and development factor (Peg-rHuMGDF), GM-CSF/erythropoietin (EPO) hybrid protein (MEN11303), and interleukin-15 (IL-15) to the basic stem cell factor (SCF) + interleukin-3 (IL-3) + EPO combination. This study showed that, among the nine different combinations tested in our 5% autologous plasma-containing cultures, only those containing IL-3/SCF/Flt3/MEN11303 and IL-3/SCF/Flt3/MEN11303/IL-15 significantly expanded colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-E), long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC), CD34+, and CD34+/CD38- cells after 14 days of culture. Particularly, the addition of IL-15 to IL-3/SCF/Flt3/MEN11303 combination produced a significant increase of LTC-IC, with an average 26-fold amplification as compared to input cells, without any detrimental effect on CFU-GM and BFU-E expansion. This combination also produced a statistically significant 3.6-fold expansion of primitive CD34+/CD38- cells. Moreover, this study confirms the previously described erythropoietic effect of MEN11303, which, in our experience, was the only factor capable of expanding BFU-E. Compared to equimolar concentrations of GM-CSF and EPO, MEN11303 hybrid protein showed a significantly higher capacity of expanding CFU-GM, BFU-E, LTC-IC, CD34+, and CD34+/CD38- cells when these cytokines were tested in combination with IL-3/SCF/Flt3. These cultures indicated that Peg-rHuMGDF addition to IL-3/SCF/EPO/Flt3 does not affect CFU-GM and BFU-E expansion but, unlike G-CSF or GM-CSF, it does not decrease the ability of Flt3 to expand primitive LTC-IC. These studies indicate that, starting from G-CSF/chemotherapy-mobilized CD34+ cells, concomitant expansion of primitive LTC-IC, CFU-GM, BFU-E, CD34+, and CD34+/CD38- cells is feasible in simple stroma-free static liquid cultures, provided IL-3/SCF/Flt3/MEN11303/IL-15 combination is used as expanding cocktail in the presence of 5% autologous plasma.

Peripheral blood stem cell collection and transplantation using the Haemonetics Multi Component System

AIM

To assess clinical usefulness of an intermittent-flow blood cell separator in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection and transplantation.

RESULTS

The Haemonetics Multi Component System (Multi) was used to collect PBSC (52 aphereses in 17 patients). The mean processing blood volume and the mean PBSC yield were 7407 ml and 2.16 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. When CD34+ cells exceeded 0.3% of the peripheral WBC, more than 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg could be collected by a single apheresis. Eight patients underwent PBSC transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy. Hematopoietic recovery was achieved in a median period of 10 days.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) A single-arm, light-weight machine has sufficient capability to collect PBSC. (2) The percentage of CD34+ cells in the peripheral WBC is a good predictor of the CD34+ cell yield of the collection.

In vitro effect of amifostine on haematopoietic progenitors exposed to carboplatin and non-alkylating antineoplastic drugs: haematoprotection acts as a drug-specific progenitor rescue

We evaluated the protective ability of amifostine on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived colony-forming unit (CFU) and PB CD34+ cells which were previously exposed in vitro to etoposide, carboplatin, doxorubicin and taxotere. Amifostine pretreatment protected PBMC-derived CFU from the toxic effect of etoposide, carboplatin and taxotere. A significant detrimental effect was exerted by amifostine on the growth of doxorubicin-treated PBMC-derived CFU. Liquid cultures of PB CD34+ cells reproduced faithfully the effects observed on growth of PBMC-derived CFU and confirmed amifostine chemoprotection against etoposide and carboplatin with its detrimental effect on doxorubicin-treated progenitors. Combining the data of viable cell count, cytometric estimation of apoptosis, cell cycle and viable cell replication rate, we found that amifostine protects from etoposide and carboplatin toxicity mainly through a mechanism of cell rescue. Conversely, the detrimental effect of amifostine on the growth of doxorubicin-treated PB CD34+ cells is apparently due to an increased G2/M arrest. In conclusion, amifostine protects haematopoietic progenitors from etoposide, carboplatin and taxotere. Progenitor rescue is the mechanism through which amifostine reduced etoposide and carboplatin toxicity.

Evaluation of two different protocols for peripheral blood stem cell collection with the Fresenius AS 104 blood cell separator

OBJECTIVES

Reconstitution of hematopoiesis by means of peripheral blood stem cells is a valid alternative to autologous bone marrow transplantation. The aim of this investigation was to increase the efficiency of collection of circulating blood progenitor cells and to obtain a purer product for transplant.

METHODS

We carried out leukapheresis procedures with the Fresenius AS 104 blood cell separator, using two different protocols, the previously used PBSC-LYM and a new mononuclear cell collection program.

RESULTS

Both programs were highly effective in collecting mononuclear cells (MNC) and CD34+ cells. Some differences were found, especially regarding MNC yield and efficiencies. There are remarkable differences in the efficiency of collection of CD34+ cells (62.38% with the new program as opposed to 31.69% with the older one). Linear regression analysis showed a negative correlation between blood volume processed and MNC efficiency only for the PBSC-LYM program. Differences were also observed in the degree of inverse correlation existing in both programs between patients' white blood cell precount and MNC collection efficiency. The inverse correlation was stronger for the PBSC-LYM program. Seven patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies received high dose chemotherapy and were subsequently transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells collected using the new protocol. All patients obtained a complete and stable engraftment with the reinfusion product collected with one or two leukapheresis procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

High efficiencies and yields were observed in the new protocol for MNC and CD34+ cells. These were able to effect rapid and complete bone marrow recovery after myeloablative chemotherapy.

Efficient collection of peripheral blood stem cells using the Fresenius AS104 in chronic myelocytic leukemia patients with very high numbers of platelets

For chronic myelocytic leukemia patients with very high numbers of platelets, we describe an efficient method for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) using the Fresenius AS104 cell separator. In these patients, it is difficult to collect a sufficient number of PBSC, due to the platelet band interfering with the machine's red cell interface sensor. We, therefore, tried a manual adjustment of the device. The collection phase was set automatically. When the whole blood began to separate into the red cell layer and plasma (plus mononuclear cell) layer, the red cell interface setting of "7:1" was changed to "OFF," and the plasma pump flow rate was controlled manually in order to locate the interface position 1 cm from the outside wall of the centrifuge chamber. After the collection phase, the procedure was returned to the automatic setting. By repeating this procedure, we were able to collect large numbers of PBSC.

High-dose carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan (CEM) with peripheral blood progenitor cell support as late intensification for high-risk cancer: non-haematological, haematological toxicities and role of growth factor administration

The present report describes the non-haematological toxicity and the influence of growth factor administration on haematological toxicity and haematopoietic recovery observed after high-dose carboplatin (1200 mg m(-2)), etoposide (900 mg m(-2)) and melphalan (100 mg m(-2)) (CEM) followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) in 40 patients with high-risk cancer during their first-line treatment. PBPCs were collected during the previous outpatient induction chemotherapy programme by leukaphereses. CEM administration with PBPCT was associated with low non-haematological toxicity and the only significant toxicity consisted of a reversible grade III/IV increase in liver enzymes in 32% of the patients. Haematopoietic recovery was very fast in all patients and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) plus EPO after PBPCT significantly reduced haematological toxicity, abrogated antibiotic administration during neutropenia and significantly reduced hospital stay and patient's hospital charge compared with patients treated with PBPCT only. None of the patients died early of CEM plus PBPCT-related complications. Low non-haematological toxicity and accelerated haematopoietic recovery renders CEM with PBPC/growth factor support an acceptable therapeutic approach in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.