Efficacy and Tolerability of Eravacycline in Bacteremic Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection: A Pooled Analysis from the IGNITE1 and IGNITE4 Studies

Pharmacotherapies for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections: current options and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are a serious concern for public health with high morbidity and mortality. Though many antibiotics have been introduced to manage these infections, there are remaining concerns regarding the optimal management of Gram-positive MDROs.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search on the PubMed/Medline database was conducted. We applied no language and time limits for the search strategy. In this narrative review, we discuss the current options for managing Gram-positive MDROs as well as non-traditional antibacterial agents in development.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite their introduction more than 70 years ago, glycopeptides are still the cornerstone in treating Gram-positive infections: all registrative studies of new antibiotics have glycopeptides as control; these studies are designed as not inferior studies, therefore it is almost impossible to give recommendations other than the use of glycopeptides in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The best evidence on treatments different from glycopeptides comes from post-hoc analysis and meta-analysis. Non-traditional antibacterial agents are being studied to aid in short and effective antibiotic therapies. The use of non-traditional antibacterial agents is not restricted to replacing traditional antibacterial agents with alternative therapies; instead, they should be used in combination with antibiotic therapies.

Eravacycline: a comprehensive review of in vitro activity, clinical efficacy, and real-world applications

INTRODUCTION

The escalating threat of multidrug-resistant organisms necessitates constant exploration for novel antimicrobial agents. Eravacycline has emerged as a promising solution due to its unique chemical structure, which enhances potency and expands its spectrum of activity.

AREA COVERED

This review provides a thorough examination of eravacycline, encompassing its in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, carbapenem-non-susceptible organisms, anaerobes, and other bacterial strains. Additionally, it evaluates evidence from clinical studies to establish its clinical effect and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Eravacycline, a synthetic fluorocycline, belongs to the tetracyclines class. Similar to other tetracycline, eravacycline exerts its antibacterial action by reversibly binding to the bacterial ribosomal 30S subunit. Eravacycline demonstrates potent in vitro activity against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes, and multidrug-resistant organisms. Randomized controlled trials and its associated meta-analysis affirm eravacycline's efficacy in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections. Moreover, real-world studies showcase eravacycline's adaptability and effectiveness in diverse clinical conditions, emphasizing its utility beyond labeled indications. Despite common gastrointestinal adverse events, eravacycline maintains an overall favorable safety profile, reinforcing its status as a tolerable antibiotic. However, ongoing research is essential for refining eravacycline's role, exploring combination therapy, and assessing its performance against biofilms, in combating challenging bacterial infections.

Combination eravacycline therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in patients with COVID-19: A case series

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) pneumonia is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased mortality. Clinical data regarding the optimal treatment of CRAB is limited, and combination therapy is often preferred. Eravacycline has demonstrated in-vitro activity against A. baumannii and has been considered for the treatment of pulmonary infections caused by CRAB.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this case series was to describe clinical outcomes associated with eravacycline when utilized as part of a combination regimen for the treatment of CRAB pneumonia at a county hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted from April 1, 2020, to October 1, 2020, which included hospitalized patients ≥18 years of age, diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with a sputum culture positive for CRAB, and receipt of at least one dose of eravacycline. The primary outcome studied was clinical resolution of CRAB pneumonia. A key secondary outcome was microbiological resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients received combination eravacycline therapy for a median of 10.5 days. Overall, 17 (71%) patients demonstrated clinical resolution of CRAB pneumonia. Repeat sputum cultures post-treatment were collected in 17 (71%) patients, of which 12 (71%) achieved microbiological resolution. No adverse events attributable to eravacycline were identified.

CONCLUSION

With limited viable salvage treatment options, combination eravacycline therapy showed favorable microbiological and clinical outcomes in patients with CRAB pneumonia. In light of this, eravacycline could be considered as a potential treatment option when designing CRAB pneumonia salvage therapy regimens.

Antimicrobial activity of eravacycline and other comparative agents on aerobic and anaerobic bacterial pathogens in Taiwan: A clinical microbiological study

OBJECTIVES

Eravacycline, a new tetracycline derivative, exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial susceptibility. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate in vitro activities of eravacycline, tigecycline, and ertapenem against various Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method. The following bacterial species were collected: vancomycin-sensitive (VS) Enterococci species, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci species (VRE), Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus anginosus, Bacteroides species, Clostridioides difficile, Clostridium innocuum, Clostridium perfringens, Parabacteroides distasonis, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

RESULTS

We found that eravacycline exhibited superior in vitro activity compared to tigecycline and ertapenem. Notably, it exhibited the lowest MIC90 for several bacterial species, including VS E. faecalis (0.12 µg/mL), VS E. faecium (0.12 µg/mL), and others. Besides, VRE was susceptible to eravacycline (MIC90:0.12 µg/mL) and tigecycline (MIC90:0.12 µg/mL), but was all resistant to ertapenem (MIC90 > 64 µg/mL). S. aureus was also susceptible to eravacycline (MIC90:0.5 µg/mL) as well as tigecycline (MIC90:1.0 µg/mL). Furthermore, S. anginosus showed higher susceptibility to eravacycline (MIC90:2.0 µg/mL) and tigecycline (MIC90:4.0 µg/mL), but lower to ertapenem (MIC90:32.0 µg/mL). Eravacycline and tigecycline also demonstrated good susceptibility to anaerobes, including Bacteroides species (susceptibility rate: 100%), P. distasonis (100%), C. difficile (94.1‒100%), C. innocuum (94.1‒96.1%), and C. perfringens (88.9‒96.3%). For S. maltophilia, both tigecycline and eravacycline showed an MIC90 of 2 µg/mL. A moderate-to-strong correlation (rho = 0.608-0.804, P < 0.001) was noted between the MIC values of eravacycline and tigecycline against various bacterial species.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the potential of eravacycline as an effective treatment option for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.

Reviewing novel treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major threat to global health and hospital-onset CRE infections have risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel antimicrobials are now available for the treatment of CRE infections. There remains an urgent need for new antimicrobials for CRE, especially for those producing metallo-β-lactamases.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses previously published research supporting currently available novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CRE infections. Newer compounds currently being evaluated in clinical trials are covered. A literature search was conducted in PubMed over all available dates for relevant published papers and conference abstracts with the search terms, 'CRE,' 'carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,' 'β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor,' 'KPC,' 'NDM,' 'metallo-β-lactamase,' 'ceftazidime-avibactam,' 'meropenem-vaborbactam,' 'imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam,' 'cefiderocol,' 'eravacycline,' 'plazomicin,' 'taniborbactam,' 'zidebactam,' and 'nacubactam.'

EXPERT OPINION

Novel antimicrobials for CRE infections have been developed, most notably the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though treatment options for infections with metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales remain few and have limitations. Development of antibiotics with activity against metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales is eagerly awaited, and there are promising new compounds in clinical trials. Finally, more clinical research is needed to optimize and individualize treatment approaches, which will help guide antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aimed at reducing the spread of CRE and development of further resistance.

Antimicrobial approach of abdominal post-surgical infections

Abdominal surgical site infections (SSIs) are infections that occur after abdominal surgery. They can be superficial, involving the skin tissue only, or more profound, involving deeper skin tissues including organs and implanted materials. Currently, SSIs are large global health problem with an incidence that varies significantly depending on the United Nations' Human Development Index. The purpose of this review is to provide a practical update on the latest available literature on SSIs, focusing on causative pathogens and treatment with an overview of the ongoing studies of new therapeutic strategies.

Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.

In vitro susceptibility of common Enterobacterales to eravacycline in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

New tetracycline derivatives exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. This study aimed to assess the in vitro activity of eravacycline against common Enterobacterales.

METHODS

Clinical Enterobacterales isolates were collected between 2017 and 2021. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using a broth microdilution test.

RESULTS

We identified Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 300), Escherichia coli (n = 300), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 100), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 100), Citrobacter freundii (n = 100), and Proteus mirabilis (n = 100). All P. mirabilis strains were resistant to eravacycline. Excluding P. mirabilis, the susceptibility rates to eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline were 75.2%, 66.9%, and 73%, respectively. The MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ (mg/L) of eravacycline were 0.5 and 4 for K. pneumoniae, 0.5 and 1 for E. coli, 0.5 and 1 for K. oxytoca, 0.5 and 2 for E. cloacae complex, and 0.25 and 1 for C. freundii. In cefotaxime non-susceptible and meropenem susceptible Enterobacterales, excluding P. mirabilis, the susceptibility rates of eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline were 69.7%, 57.1%, and 66.2%. We found decreased susceptibility rates of three new tetracycline derivatives against meropenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales (eravacycline: 47.1%, omadacycline: 39.4%, and tigecycline: 39.4%). Eravacycline showed a high susceptibility rate against cefotaxime non-susceptible and meropenem susceptible K. oxytoca (100%), C. freundii (93.2%), E. coli (85.9%), and meropenem non-susceptible E. coli (100%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides the MIC and susceptibility rate of eravacycline for common Enterobacterales. Eravacycline could be a therapeutic choice for cefotaxime non-susceptible or meropenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales, especially K. oxytoca, C. freundii, and E. coli.

How to use new antibiotics in the therapy of serious multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections are becoming more common and pose a serious threat to both individual patients and the population as a whole. Treatment of these infections can be difficult and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss information and strategies for using new antibiotics to combat these infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Eight new antibiotics represent possible means to treat multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections. Although no new mechanisms of action are present amongst these new antibiotics, novel additions to previously utilized mechanisms have been shown to be viable options for treatment of highly resistant organisms.

SUMMARY

The novel antibiotics considered in this review have varying data on their use as empiric treatment of patients at high risk for multidrug resistant organisms and as final therapy for identified multidrug resistant organisms. Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relabactam have the best support evidence for use in this patient population.

New antimicrobial treatment options for severe Gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will provide rationale for the development of new antibiotics to treat severe or multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections. It will also provide an overview of recently approved and pipeline antibiotics for severe/MDR Gram-negative infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

MDR Gram-negative infections are recognized as critical threats by global and national organizations and carry a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Increasing antibiotic resistance amongst Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii , extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , with difficult-to-treat-resistance has made both empiric and definitive treatment of these infections increasingly problematic. In recent years, several antibiotics have been approved for treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections and ongoing clinical trials are poised to provide additional options to clinicians' armamentarium. These agents include various β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, eravacycline, plazomicin and cefiderocol.

SUMMARY

Severe/MDR Gram-negative infections continue to be important infections due to their impact on patient outcomes, especially in critically ill and immunocompromised hosts. The availability of new antibiotics offers an opportunity to improve empiric and definitive treatment of these infections.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection after solid organ transplantation: Recent trends in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches

Background

Infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli (MDR GNB), in particular extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing (ESBL‐E) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a major threat in solid organ transplantation (SOT). Outcome prediction and therapy are challenging due to the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or well‐designed observational studies focused on this population.

Methods

Narrative review with a focus on the contributions provided by the ongoing multinational INCREMENT‐SOT consortium (ClinicalTrials identifier NCT02852902) in the fields of epidemiology and clinical management.

Results

The Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), the Group for Study of Infection in Transplantation of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GESITRA‐SEIMC), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) recently published their recommendations for the management of MDR GNB infections in SOT recipients. We revisit the SET/GESITRA‐SEIMC/REIPI document taking into consideration new evidence that emerged on the molecular epidemiology, prognostic stratification, and treatment of post‐transplant ESBL‐E and CRE infections. Results derived from the INCREMENT‐SOT consortium may support the therapeutic approach to post‐transplant bloodstream infection (BSI). The initiatives devoted to sparing the use of carbapenems in low‐risk ESBL‐E BSI or to repurposing existing non‐β‐lactam antibiotics for CRE in both non‐transplant and transplant patients are reviewed, as well as the eventual positioning in the specific SOT setting of recently approved antibiotics.

Conclusion

Due to the clinical complexity and relative rarity of ESBL‐E and CRE infections in SOT recipients, multinational cooperative efforts such as the INCREMENT‐SOT Project should be encouraged. In addition, RCTs focused on post‐transplant serious infection remain urgently needed.

A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation of Eravacycline Utilization in Community and Academic Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic tetracycline approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in August 2018. This study sought to characterize early clinical experience with this novel antibiotic.

METHODS

Utilization of eravacycline for 66 patients in an academic and two community hospitals was retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Eravacycline was used as monotherapy in 62.1% of cases for a mean duration of 13.1 days (standard deviation [SD] 9.9 days). The majority (68.2%) of treatment was for off-label indications, including 34.8% for pulmonary and 28.8% for skin/soft tissue sites of infection. Also encountered was a number of difficult-to-treat organisms: 50% of identified Gram-negative pathogens were resistant to carbapenems in vitro, and 48% of identified Gram-positive pathogens were resistant to vancomycin in vitro. The patient population had a high acuity of illness with 42.4% requiring ICU admission, 59.1% having at least two comorbidities, and 33.3% having at least three comorbidities. Despite the high acuity, 95.5% experienced clinical improvement with 86.4% achieving full resolution of infection after receiving eravacycline. The three patients who did not experience clinical improvement had an intra-abdominal source of infection without adequate source control. The remaining six who did not experience full resolution of infection died from an unrelated non-infectious cause during hospital admission. Adverse events were uncommon (4.5%), were limited to nausea and vomiting, and did not lead to discontinuation of eravacycline. Though two patients had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), no patients developed CDI while receiving eravacycline.

CONCLUSION

These results illustrate the potential versatility of eravacycline with a broad spectrum of activity, good safety and tolerability profile, flexibility for use in patients with renal injury or antibiotic allergies, and positive clinical outcomes in this large real-world cohort.

Escalating antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae: focus on carbapenemases

Introduction: Over the past few decades, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has skyrocketed globally among bacteria within the Family Enterobacteriaceae (i.e. Enterobacter spp, Klebsiella spp, Escherichia coli, Proteus spp, Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter spp, and others). Enterobacteriaceae are intestinal flora and are important pathogens in nosocomial and community settings. Enterobacteriaceae spread easily between humans and may acquire AMR via plasmids or other mobile resistance elements. The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant (MDR) clones have greatly limited therapeutic options. Some infections are untreatable with existing antimicrobials.Areas covered: The authors discuss the escalation of CRE globally, the epidemiology and outcomes of CRE infections, the optimal therapy, and the potential role of several new antimicrobials to combat MDR organisms. An exhaustive search for literature related to Enterobacteriaceae was performed using PubMed, using the following key words: antimicrobial resistance; carbapenemases; Enterobacterales; Enterobacteriaceae; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Escherichia coli; global epidemiology; metallo-β-lactamases; multidrug resistance; New Delhi Metalloproteinase-1 (NDM-1); plasmidsExpert opinion: Innovation and development of new classes of antibacterial agents are critical to expand effective therapeutic options. The authors encourage the judicious use of antibiotics and aggressive infection-control measures are essential to minimize the spread of AMR.

Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study

Background

Severity/mortality risk scores and disease characteristics may assist in deciding whether patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) require outpatient treatment or hospitalization. The phase 3 OPTIC (Omadacycline for Pneumonia Treatment In the Community) study enrolled patients with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class II–IV. Omadacycline demonstrated noninferiority to moxifloxacin in adults with CABP, at early clinical response (ECR) and posttreatment evaluation (PTE). We assessed efficacy of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin in these patients based on disease severity.

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous (IV) omadacycline (100 mg every 12 hours for 2 doses followed by 100 mg daily [q24h], with optional transition to omadacycline 300 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment) or moxifloxacin IV 400 mg q24h (with optional transition to 400 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment). Total treatment duration was 7–14 days. We compared rates of early clinical success (72–120 hours after first dose) and investigator-assessed clinical success at PTE (5–10 days after last dose) in subgroups based (1) on severity/mortality risk scores (PORT, CURB-65, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment, modified ATS, SMART-COP) and (2) on presence of baseline radiographic characteristics, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma, or bacteremia.

Results

Altogether, 774 patients (omadacycline, n = 386; moxifloxacin, n = 388) were randomized. Clinical success rates (ECR/PTE) were similar between treatment groups (across all subgroups). Efficacy across treatment groups was similar in patients with baseline radiographic characteristics or COPD/asthma, but moxifloxacin had higher clinical success rates in patients with bacteremia.

Conclusions

Efficacy of omadacycline was similar to that of moxifloxacin, regardless of disease severity/mortality risk and disease characteristics.