1
|
Subedi D, Pantha S, Jyoti S, Gautam B, Kaphle K, Yadav RK, Ghimire S, Dhakal S. Anthrax in Humans, Animals, and the Environment and the One Health Strategies for Anthrax Control. Pathogens 2024; 13:773. [PMID: 39338965 PMCID: PMC11435069 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13090773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Anthrax is a notorious disease of public health importance caused by Bacillus anthracis. The causative agent can also be used as a biological weapon. Spores of these bacteria can sustain extreme environmental conditions and remain viable in soil for decades. Domestic and wild ruminants are highly susceptible to this pathogen, which usually presents as a peracute to acute disease. In humans, cutaneous anthrax is frequent but pulmonary and enteric anthrax are more serious. Humans, animals, and the environment are all involved, making anthrax a perfect target for a One Health approach. The environment plays a key role in disease transmission. At a time when the One Health concept is not mere slogans, collaborative efforts of medical professionals, veterinarians, and environmental scientists will be valuable for the prevention and control of this disease. In this review, we discussed the transmission dynamics of anthrax in the environment, animals, and humans, as well as One Health strategies to control and prevent anthrax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Subedi
- Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University, Siddarthanagar 32900, Nepal; (S.P.); (S.J.); (B.G.); (K.K.); (R.K.Y.)
- Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Saurav Pantha
- Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University, Siddarthanagar 32900, Nepal; (S.P.); (S.J.); (B.G.); (K.K.); (R.K.Y.)
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, 1800 Denison Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA;
| | - Sumit Jyoti
- Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University, Siddarthanagar 32900, Nepal; (S.P.); (S.J.); (B.G.); (K.K.); (R.K.Y.)
- Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
| | - Bickal Gautam
- Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University, Siddarthanagar 32900, Nepal; (S.P.); (S.J.); (B.G.); (K.K.); (R.K.Y.)
| | - Krishna Kaphle
- Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University, Siddarthanagar 32900, Nepal; (S.P.); (S.J.); (B.G.); (K.K.); (R.K.Y.)
| | - Rakesh Kumar Yadav
- Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University, Siddarthanagar 32900, Nepal; (S.P.); (S.J.); (B.G.); (K.K.); (R.K.Y.)
- Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116041, China
| | - Shristi Ghimire
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, 1800 Denison Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA;
| | - Santosh Dhakal
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, 1800 Denison Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wood JP. Review of techniques for the in-situ sterilization of soil contaminated with Bacillus anthracis spores or other pathogens. Res Microbiol 2024; 175:104175. [PMID: 38141796 PMCID: PMC11192063 DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2023.104175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
This review summarizes the literature on efficacy of techniques to sterilize soil. Soil may need to be sterilized if contaminated with pathogens such as Bacillus anthracis. Sterilizing soil in-situ minimizes spread of the bio-contaminant. Soil is difficult to sterilize, with efficacy generally diminishing with depth. Methyl bromide, formaldehyde, and glutaraldehyde are the only soil treatment options that have been demonstrated at full-scale to effectively inactivate Bacillus spores. Soil sterilization modalities with high efficacy at bench-scale include wet and dry heat, metam sodium, chlorine dioxide gas, and activated sodium persulfate. Simple oxidants such as chlorine bleach are ineffective in sterilizing soil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Wood
- United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Homeland Security Research Program, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., P.O. Box 12055, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maison RM, Priore MR, Brown VR, Bodenchuk MJ, Borlee BR, Bowen RA, Bosco-Lauth AM. Feral Swine as Indirect Indicators of Environmental Anthrax Contamination and Potential Mechanical Vectors of Infectious Spores. Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12040622. [PMID: 37111508 PMCID: PMC10142851 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12040622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Anthrax is a disease that affects livestock, wildlife, and humans worldwide; however, its relative impacts on these populations remain underappreciated. Feral swine (Sus scrofa) are relatively resistant to developing anthrax, and past serosurveys have alluded to their utility as sentinels, yet empirical data to support this are lacking. Moreover, whether feral swine may assist in the dissemination of infectious spores is unknown. To address these knowledge gaps, we intranasally inoculated 15 feral swine with varying quantities of Bacillus anthracis Sterne 34F2 spores and measured the seroconversion and bacterial shedding over time. The animals also were inoculated either one or three times. The sera were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies against B. anthracis, and nasal swabs were cultured to detect bacterial shedding from the nasal passages. We report that the feral swine developed antibody responses to B. anthracis and that the strength of the response correlated with the inoculum dose and the number of exposure events experienced. Isolation of viable bacteria from the nasal passages of the animals throughout the study period suggests that feral swine may assist in the spread of infectious spores on the landscape and have implications for the identification of environments contaminated with B. anthracis as well as the exposure risk to more susceptible hosts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Maison
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| | - Maggie R Priore
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| | - Vienna R Brown
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| | - Michael J Bodenchuk
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, San Antonio, TX 78269, USA
| | - Bradley R Borlee
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| | - Richard A Bowen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| | - Angela M Bosco-Lauth
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bakhteeva I, Timofeev V. Some Peculiarities of Anthrax Epidemiology in Herbivorous and Carnivorous Animals. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12060870. [PMID: 35743901 PMCID: PMC9224990 DOI: 10.3390/life12060870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Anthrax is an especially dangerous zooanthroponosis caused by the Gram-positive spore-forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis. A notable feature of this disease is the difference in susceptibility to it among different groups of animals. Anthrax primarily affects herbivorous ungulate mammals; they are easily infected, and their disease often leads to rapid, even sudden, death. However, predators and scavengers are extremely resistant to anthrax, and if they become infected, they usually become mildly ill. As the result of the increased sensitivity of ungulates to anthrax and the possibility of disease transmission from them to humans, most studies of anthrax have focused on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of infection in farm animals and humans. The issues of anthrax in other animals, such as predators, and the peculiarities of anthrax epidemiology in wild ungulates have not been sufficiently detailed in the literature. In this article, we provide a review of literature sources that describe the differential susceptibility to infection of various groups of animals to anthrax and some epidemiological features of anthrax in animals that are not the main hosts of B. anthracis.
Collapse
|