The tethering complex HOPS catalyzes assembly of the soluble SNARE Vam7 into fusogenic trans-SNARE complexes

After their membrane assembly, Sec18 (NSF) and Sec17 (SNAP) promote membrane fusion

The energy that drives membrane fusion can come from either complete SNARE zippering, from Sec17 and Sec18, or both. Sec17 and Sec18 initially form a complex which binds membranes. Sec17, Sec18, and the apolarity of a loop on the N-domain of Sec17 are required for their interdependent membrane association. To determine whether Sec18 and the Sec17 loop apolarity are still required for fusion after their membrane arrival, a hydrophobic transmembrane (TM) anchor was affixed to the N-terminus of Sec17, forming TM-Sec17. Fusion without energy from complete SNARE zippering requires Sec18 as well as either Sec17 or TM-Sec17. Even without the need for membrane targeting, the TM-Sec17 apolar loop strongly stimulates Sec17/18-driven fusion. Thus, Sec18 and the Sec17 apolar loop are first required for membrane targeting, and once bound, drive rapid fusion. Each of these variables-the absence or presence of Sec17, its N-loop apolarity, addition or omission of Sec18, and unimpeded or diminished energy from SNARE zippering-has almost no effect on the amount of trans-SNARE complex, but instead regulates the capacity of docked membranes to fuse.

Membrane fusion reactions limited by defective SNARE zippering or stiff lipid fatty acyl composition have distinct requirements for Sec17, Sec18, and adenine nucleotide

Intracellular membrane fusion is catalyzed by SNAREs, Rab GTPases, SM proteins, tethers, Sec18/NSF and Sec17/SNAP. Membrane fusion has been reconstituted with purified vacuolar proteins and lipids to address 3 salient questions: whether ATP hydrolysis by Sec18 affects its promotion of fusion, whether fusion promotion by Sec17 and Sec18 is only seen with mutant SNAREs or can also be seen with wild-type SNAREs, and whether Sec17 and Sec18 only promote fusion when they work together or whether they can each work separately. Fusion is driven by two engines, completion of SNARE zippering (which does not need Sec17/Sec18) and Sec17/Sec18-mediated fusion (needing SNAREs but not the energy from their complete zippering). Sec17 is required to rescue fusion that is blocked by incomplete zippering, though optimal rescue also needs the ATPase Sec18. ATP is an essential Sec18 ligand, but at limiting Sec17 levels Sec18 ATP hydrolysis also drives release of Sec17 without concomitant trans-SNARE complex disassembly. At higher (physiological) Sec17 levels, or without ATP hydrolysis, fusion prevails over Sec17 release. Stiff 16:0, 18:1 fatty acyl chain lipids provide an alternative route to suppressing fusion, with entirely wild-type SNAREs and without impediment to zippering. In this case, Sec17 and Sec18 restore comparable fusion with either ATP or a nonhydrolyzable analog. Fusion blocked by impaired zippering can be restored by concentrated Sec17 alone (but not by Sec18), while fusion inhibited by stiff fatty acyl chains is partially restored by Sec18 alone (but not by Sec17). With distinct fusion impediments, Sec18 and Sec17 have both shared roles and independent roles in promoting fusion.

Model-based inference of a dual role for HOPS in regulating guard cell vacuole fusion

Guard cell movements depend, in part, on the remodelling of vacuoles from a highly fragmented state to a fused morphology during stomata opening. Indeed, full opening of plant stomata requires vacuole fusion to occur. Fusion of vacuole membranes is a highly conserved process in eukaryotes, with key roles played by two multi-subunit complexes: HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuolar protein sorting) and SNARE (soluble NSF attachment protein receptor). HOPS is a vacuole tethering factor that is thought to chaperone SNAREs from apposing vacuole membranes into a fusion-competent complex capable of rearranging membranes. In plants, recruitment of HOPS subunits to the tonoplast has been shown to require the presence of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate. However, chemically depleting this lipid induces vacuole fusion. To resolve this counter-intuitive observation regarding the role of HOPS in regulating plant vacuole morphology, we defined a quantitative model of vacuole fusion dynamics and used it to generate testable predictions about HOPS-SNARE interactions. We derived our model by using simulation-based inference to integrate prior knowledge about molecular interactions with limited, qualitative observations of emergent vacuole phenotypes. By constraining the model parameters to yield the emergent outcomes observed for stoma opening-as induced by two distinct chemical treatments-we predicted a dual role for HOPS and identified a stalled form of the SNARE complex that differs from phenomena reported in yeast. We predict that HOPS has contradictory actions at different points in the fusion signalling pathway, promoting the formation of SNARE complexes, but limiting their activity.

Sec18 binds the tethering/SM complex HOPS to engage the Qc-SNARE for membrane fusion

Membrane fusion is regulated by Rab GTPases, their tethering effectors such as HOPS, SNARE proteins on each fusion partner, SM proteins to catalyze SNARE assembly, Sec17 (SNAP), and Sec18 (NSF). Though concentrated HOPS can support fusion without Sec18, we now report that fusion falls off sharply at lower HOPS levels, where direct Sec18 binding to HOPS restores fusion. This Sec18-dependent fusion needs adenine nucleotide but neither ATP hydrolysis nor Sec17. Sec18 enhances HOPS recognition of the Qc-SNARE. With high levels of HOPS, Qc has a Km for fusion of a few nM. Either lower HOPS levels, or substitution of a synthetic tether for HOPS, strikingly increases the Km for Qc to several hundred nM. With dilute HOPS, Sec18 returns the Km for Qc to low nM. In contrast, HOPS concentration and Sec18 have no effect on Qb-SNARE recognition. Just as Qc is required for fusion but not for the initial assembly of SNAREs in trans, impaired Qc recognition by limiting HOPS without Sec18 still allows substantial trans-SNARE assembly. Thus, in addition to the known Sec18 functions of disassembling SNARE complexes, oligomerizing Sec17 for membrane association, and allowing Sec17 to drive fusion without complete SNARE zippering, we report a fourth Sec18 function, the Sec17-independent binding of Sec18 to HOPS to enhance functional Qc-SNARE engagement.

Loss of the HOPS complex disrupts early-to-late endosome transition, impairs endosomal recycling and induces accumulation of amphisomes

The multisubunit HOPS tethering complex is a well-established regulator of lysosome fusion with late endosomes and autophagosomes. However, the role of the HOPS complex in other stages of endo-lysosomal trafficking is not well understood. To address this, we made HeLa cells knocked out for the HOPS-specific subunits Vps39 or Vps41, or the HOPS-CORVET-core subunits Vps18 or Vps11. In all four knockout cells, we found that endocytosed cargos were trapped in enlarged endosomes that clustered in the perinuclear area. By correlative light-electron microscopy, these endosomes showed a complex ultrastructure and hybrid molecular composition, displaying markers for early (Rab5, PtdIns3P, EEA1) as well as late (Rab7, CD63, LAMP1) endosomes. These "HOPS bodies" were not acidified, contained enzymatically inactive cathepsins and accumulated endocytosed cargo and cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor (CI-MPR). Consequently, CI-MPR was depleted from the TGN, and secretion of lysosomal enzymes to the extracellular space was enhanced. Strikingly, HOPS bodies also contained the autophagy proteins p62 and LC3, defining them as amphisomes. Together, these findings show that depletion of the lysosomal HOPS complex has a profound impact on the functional organization of the entire endosomal system and suggest the existence of a HOPS-independent mechanism for amphisome formation.

Model-based inference of a plant-specific dual role for HOPS in regulating guard cell vacuole fusion

Stomata are the pores on a leaf surface that regulate gas exchange. Each stoma consists of two guard cells whose movements regulate pore opening and thereby control CO2 fixation and water loss. Guard cell movements depend in part on the remodeling of vacuoles, which have been observed to change from a highly fragmented state to a fused morphology during stomata opening. This change in morphology requires a membrane fusion mechanism that responds rapidly to environmental signals, allowing plants to respond to diurnal and stress cues. With guard cell vacuoles being both large and responsive to external signals, stomata represent a unique system in which to delineate mechanisms of membrane fusion. Fusion of vacuole membranes is a highly conserved process in eukaryotes, with key roles played by two multi-subunit complexes: HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuolar protein sorting) and SNARE (soluble NSF attachment protein receptor). HOPS is a vacuole tethering factor that is thought to chaperone SNAREs from apposing vacuole membranes into a fusion-competent complex capable of rearranging membranes. To resolve a counter-intuitive observation regarding the role of HOPS in regulating plant vacuole morphology, we derived a quantitative model of vacuole fusion dynamics and used it to generate testable predictions about HOPS-SNARE interactions. We derived our model by applying simulation-based inference to integrate prior knowledge about molecular interactions with limited, qualitative observations of emergent vacuole phenotypes. By constraining the model parameters to yield the emergent outcomes observed for stoma opening - as induced by two distinct chemical treatments - we predicted a dual role for HOPS and identified a stalled form of the SNARE complex that differs from phenomena reported in yeast. We predict that HOPS has contradictory actions at different points in the fusion signaling pathway, promoting the formation of SNARE complexes, but limiting their activity.

MARCKS Effector Domain, a reversible lipid ligand, illuminates late stages of membrane fusion

Yeast vacuolar HOPS tethers membranes, catalyzes trans-SNARE assembly between R- and Q-SNAREs, and shepherds SNAREs past early inhibition by Sec17. After partial SNARE zippering, fusion is driven slowly by either completion of SNARE zippering or by Sec17/Sec18, but rapid fusion needs zippering and Sec17/Sec18. Using reconstituted-vacuolar fusion, we find that MARCKS Effector Domain (MED) peptide, a lipid ligand, blocks fusion reversibly at a late reaction stage. The MED fusion blockade is overcome by either salt extraction, inactivation with the MED ligand calmodulin, or addition of Sec17/Sec18. During incubation with MED, SNAREs assemble stable complexes in trans and fusion becomes resistant to antibody to the Qa SNARE. When Q-SNAREs are preassembled, a synthetic tether can replace HOPS for fusion. With a synthetic tether, fusion needs both complete SNARE zippering and Sec17/Sec18 to overcome a MED block. In contrast, when SNARE domains are only two-third zippered, only HOPS will support Sec17/Sec18 driven fusion without needing complete zippering. HOPS thus remains engaged with SNAREs during zippering. MED facilitates the study of distinct fusion stages: tethering, initial trans-SNARE assembly and its sensitivity to Sec17, SNARE zippering, Sec17/Sec18 engagement, and lipid and lumenal mixing.

Efficient fusion requires a membrane anchor on the vacuolar Qa-SNARE

As a prelude to fusion, the R-SNARE on one membrane zippers with Qa-, Qb-, and Qc-SNAREs from its apposed fusion partner, forming a four-helical bundle that draws the two membranes together. Because Qa- and Qb-SNAREs are anchored to the same membrane and are adjacent in the 4-SNARE bundle, their two anchors might be redundant. Using the recombinant pure protein catalysts of yeast vacuole fusion, we now report that the specific distribution of transmembrane (TM) anchors on the Q-SNAREs is critical for efficient fusion. A TM anchor on the Qa-SNARE supports rapid fusion even when the other two Q-SNAREs are unanchored, while a TM anchor on the Qb-SNARE is dispensable and is insufficient for rapid fusion as the sole Q-SNARE anchor. This does not depend on which specific TM domain is attached to the Qa-SNARE but rather is due to the Qa-SNARE being anchored per se. The need for Qa-SNARE anchoring is even seen when the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting protein (HOPS), the physiological catalyst of tethering and SNARE assembly, is replaced by an artificial tether. The need for a Qa TM anchor is thus a fundamental property of vacuolar SNARE zippering-induced fusion and may reflect the need for the Qa juxtamembrane (JxQa) region to be anchored between its SNARE and TM domains. This requirement for Qa-SNARE anchoring and correct JxQa position is bypassed by Sec17/Sec18, exploiting a platform of partially zippered SNAREs. Because Qa is the only synaptic Q-SNARE with a TM anchor, the need for Qa-specific anchoring may reflect a general requirement for SNARE-mediated fusion.

Membrane tethers at a glance

Cargo delivery from one compartment to the next relies on the fusion of vesicles with different cellular organelles in a process that requires the concerted action of tethering factors. Although all tethers act to bridge vesicle membranes to mediate fusion, they form very diverse groups as they differ in composition, and in their overall architecture and size, as well as their protein interactome. However, their conserved function relies on a common design. Recent data on class C Vps complexes indicates that tethers play a significant role in membrane fusion beyond vesicle capturing. Furthermore, these studies provide additional mechanistic insights into membrane fusion events and reveal that tethers should be considered as key players of the fusion machinery. Moreover, the discovery of the novel tether FERARI complex has changed our understanding of cargo transport in the endosomal system as it has been shown to mediate 'kiss-and-run' vesicle-target membrane interactions. In this Cell Science at a Glance and the accompanying poster, we compare the structure of the coiled-coil and the multisubunit CATCHR and class C Vps tether families on the basis of their functional analogy. We discuss the mechanism of membrane fusion, and summarize how tethers capture vesicles, mediate membrane fusion at different cellular compartments and regulate cargo traffic.

PI3P regulates multiple stages of membrane fusion

The conserved catalysts of intracellular membrane fusion are Rab-family GTPases, effector complexes that bind Rabs for membrane tethering, SNARE proteins of the R, Qa, Qb, and Qc families, and SNARE chaperones of the SM, Sec17/SNAP, and Sec18/NSF families. Yeast vacuole fusion is regulated by phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P). PI3P binds directly to the vacuolar Qc-SNARE and to HOPS, the vacuolar tethering/SM complex. We now report several distinct functions of PI3P in fusion. PI3P binds the N-terminal PX domain of the Qc-SNARE to enhance its engagement for fusion. Even when Qc has been preassembled with the Qa- and Qb-SNAREs, PI3P still promotes trans-SNARE assembly and fusion between these 3Q proteoliposomes and those with R-SNARE, whether with the natural HOPS tether or with a synthetic tether. With HOPS, efficient trans-SNARE complex formation needs PI3P on the 3Q-SNARE proteoliposomes, in cis to the Qc. PI3P is also needed for HOPS to confer resistance to Sec17/Sec18. With a synthetic tether, fusion is supported by PI3P on either fusion partner membrane, but this fusion is blocked by Sec17/Sec18. PI3P thus supports multiple stages of fusion: the engagement of the Qc-SNARE, trans-SNARE complex formation with preassembled Q-SNAREs, HOPS protection of SNARE complexes from Sec17/Sec18, and fusion per se after tethering and Q-SNARE assembly.

Sec18 supports membrane fusion by promoting Sec17 membrane association

Membrane fusion is driven by Sec17, Sec18, and SNARE zippering. Sec17 bound to SNAREs promotes fusion through its membrane-proximal N-terminal apolar loop domain. At its membrane-distal end, Sec17 serves as a high-affinity receptor for Sec18. At that distance from the fusion site, it has been unclear how Sec18 can aid Sec17 to promote fusion. We now report that Sec18, with ATPγS, lowers the Km of Sec17 for fusion. A C-terminal and membrane-distal Sec17 mutation, L291A,L292A, diminishes Sec17 affinity for Sec18. High levels of wild-type Sec17 or Sec17-L291AL292A show equivalent fusion without Sec18, but Sec18 causes far less fusion enhancement with low levels of Sec17-L291AL292A than with wild-type Sec17. Another mutant, Sec17-F21SM22S, has reduced N-loop apolarity. Only very high levels of this mutant protein support fusion, but Sec18 still lowers the apparent fusion Km for Sec17-F21SM22S. Thus Sec18 stimulates fusion through Sec17 and acts at the well-described interface between Sec18 and Sec17. ATP acts as a ligand to activate Sec18 for Sec17-dependent fusion, but ATP hydrolysis is not required. Even without SNAREs, Sec18 and Sec17 exhibit interdependent stable association with lipids, with several Sec17 bound for each Sec18 hexamer, explaining how Sec18 stabilization of surface-concentrated clusters of Sec17 lowers the Sec17 Km for assembly with SNAREs. Each of the associations, between SNARE complex, Sec18, Sec17, and lipid, helps assemble the fusion machinery.

Mechanisms regulating the sorting of soluble lysosomal proteins

Lysosomes are key regulators of many fundamental cellular processes such as metabolism, autophagy, immune response, cell signalling and plasma membrane repair. These highly dynamic organelles are composed of various membrane and soluble proteins, which are essential for their proper functioning. The soluble proteins include numerous proteases, glycosidases and other hydrolases, along with activators, required for catabolism. The correct sorting of soluble lysosomal proteins is crucial to ensure the proper functioning of lysosomes and is achieved through the coordinated effort of many sorting receptors, resident ER and Golgi proteins, and several cytosolic components. Mutations in a number of proteins involved in sorting soluble proteins to lysosomes result in human disease. These can range from rare diseases such as lysosome storage disorders, to more prevalent ones, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and others, including rare neurodegenerative diseases that affect children. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that regulate the sorting of soluble proteins to lysosomes and highlight the effects of mutations in this pathway that cause human disease. More precisely, we will review the route taken by soluble lysosomal proteins from their translation into the ER, their maturation along the Golgi apparatus, and sorting at the trans-Golgi network. We will also highlight the effects of mutations in this pathway that cause human disease.

Fusion with wild-type SNARE domains is controlled by juxtamembrane domains, transmembrane anchors, and Sec17

Membrane fusion requires tethers, SNAREs of R, Qa, Qb, and Qc families, and chaperones of the SM, Sec17/SNAP, and Sec18/NSF families. SNAREs have N-domains, SNARE domains that zipper into 4-helical RQaQbQc coiled coils, a short juxtamembrane (Jx) domain, and (often) a C-terminal transmembrane anchor. We reconstitute fusion with purified components from yeast vacuoles, where the HOPS protein combines tethering and SM functions. The vacuolar Rab, lipids, and R-SNARE activate HOPS to bind Q-SNAREs and catalyze trans-SNARE associations. With SNAREs initially disassembled, as they are on the organelle, we now report that R- and Qa-SNAREs require their physiological juxtamembrane (Jx) regions for fusion. Swap of the Jx domain between the R- and Qa-SNAREs blocks fusion after SNARE association in trans. This block is bypassed by either Sec17, which drives fusion without requiring complete SNARE zippering, or transmembrane-anchored Qb-SNARE in complex with Qa. The abundance of the trans-SNARE complex is not the sole fusion determinant, as it is unaltered by Sec17, Jx swap, or the Qb-transmembrane anchor. The sensitivity of fusion to Jx swap in the absence of a Qb transmembrane anchor is inherent to the SNAREs, because it remains when a synthetic tether replaces HOPS.

Phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate activate HOPS to catalyze SNARE assembly, allowing small headgroup lipids to support the terminal steps of membrane fusion

Intracellular membrane fusion requires Rab GTPases, tethers, SNAREs of the R, Qa, Qb, and Qc families, and SNARE chaperones of the Sec17 (SNAP), Sec18 (NSF), and SM (Sec1/Munc18) families. The vacuolar HOPS complex combines the functions of membrane tethering and SM catalysis of SNARE assembly. HOPS is activated for this catalysis by binding to the vacuolar lipids and Rab. Of the eight major vacuolar lipids, we now report that phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate are required to activate HOPS for SNARE complex assembly. These lipids plus ergosterol also allow full trans-SNARE complex assembly, yet do not support fusion, which is reliant on either phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) or on phosphatidic acid (PA), phosphatidylserine (PS), and diacylglycerol (DAG). Fusion with a synthetic tether and without HOPS, or even without SNAREs, still relies on either PE or on PS, PA, and DAG. These lipids are thus required for the terminal bilayer rearrangement step of fusion, distinct from the lipid requirements for the earlier step of activating HOPS for trans-SNARE assembly.

Fusion of tethered membranes can be driven by Sec18/NSF and Sec17/αSNAP without HOPS

Yeast vacuolar membrane fusion has been reconstituted with R, Qa, Qb, and Qc-family SNAREs, Sec17/αSNAP, Sec18/NSF, and the hexameric HOPS complex. HOPS tethers membranes and catalyzes SNARE assembly into RQaQbQc trans-complexes which zipper through their SNARE domains to promote fusion. Previously, we demonstrated that Sec17 and Sec18 can bypass the requirement of complete zippering for fusion (Song et al., 2021), but it has been unclear whether this activity of Sec17 and Sec18 is directly coupled to HOPS. HOPS can be replaced for fusion by a synthetic tether when the three Q-SNAREs are pre-assembled. We now report that fusion intermediates with arrested SNARE zippering, formed with a synthetic tether but without HOPS, support Sec17/Sec18-triggered fusion. This zippering-bypass fusion is thus a direct result of Sec17 and Sec18 interactions: with each other, with the platform of partially zippered SNAREs, and with the apposed tethered membranes. As these fusion elements are shared among all exocytic and endocytic traffic, Sec17 and Sec18 may have a general role in directly promoting fusion.

An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles

Vesicle tethers are thought to underpin the efficiency of intracellular fusion by bridging vesicles to their target membranes. However, the interplay between tethering and fusion has remained enigmatic. Here, through optogenetic control of either a natural tether-the exocyst complex-or an artificial tether, we report that tethering regulates the mode of fusion. We find that vesicles mainly undergo kiss-and-run instead of full fusion in the absence of functional exocyst. Full fusion is rescued by optogenetically restoring exocyst function, in a manner likely dependent on the stoichiometry of tether engagement with the plasma membrane. In contrast, a passive artificial tether produces mostly kissing events, suggesting that kiss-and-run is the default mode of vesicle fusion. Optogenetic control of tethering further shows that fusion mode has physiological relevance since only full fusion could trigger lamellipodial expansion. These findings demonstrate that active coupling between tethering and fusion is critical for robust membrane merger.

Sec17/Sec18 can support membrane fusion without help from completion of SNARE zippering

Membrane fusion requires R-, Qa-, Qb-, and Qc-family SNAREs that zipper into RQaQbQc coiled coils, driven by the sequestration of apolar amino acids. Zippering has been thought to provide all the force driving fusion. Sec17/αSNAP can form an oligomeric assembly with SNAREs with the Sec17 C-terminus bound to Sec18/NSF, the central region bound to SNAREs, and a crucial apolar loop near the N-terminus poised to insert into membranes. We now report that Sec17 and Sec18 can drive robust fusion without requiring zippering completion. Zippering-driven fusion is blocked by deleting the C-terminal quarter of any Q-SNARE domain or by replacing the apolar amino acids of the Qa-SNARE that face the center of the 4-SNARE coiled coils with polar residues. These blocks, singly or combined, are bypassed by Sec17 and Sec18, and SNARE-dependent fusion is restored without help from completing zippering.

A Rab prenyl membrane-anchor allows effector recognition to be regulated by guanine nucleotide

Membrane fusion is catalyzed by conserved proteins R, Qa, Qb, and Qc SNAREs, which form tetrameric RQaQbQc complexes between membranes; SNARE chaperones of the SM, Sec17/αSNAP, and Sec18/NSF families; Rab-GTPases (Rabs); and Rab effectors. Rabs are anchored to membranes by C-terminal prenyl groups, but can also function when anchored by an apolar polypeptide. Rabs are regulated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), activating the hydrolysis of bound GTP. We have reconstituted fusion with pure components from yeast vacuoles including SNAREs, the HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting) tethering and SNARE-assembly complex, and the Rab Ypt7, bound to membranes by either C-terminal prenyl groups (Ypt7-pr) or a recombinant transmembrane anchor (Ypt7-tm). We now report that HOPS-dependent fusion occurs with Ypt7 anchored by either means, but only Ypt7-pr requires GTP for activation and is inactive either with bound GDP or without bound guanine nucleotide. In contrast, Ypt7-tm is constitutively active for HOPS-dependent fusion, independent of bound guanine nucleotide. Fusion inhibition by the GAP Gyp1-46 is not limited to Ypt7-tm with bound GTP, indicating that this GAP has an additional mode of regulating fusion. Phosphorylation of HOPS by the vacuolar kinase Yck3 renders fusion strictly dependent on GTP-activated Ypt7, whether bound to membranes by prenyl or transmembrane anchor. The binding of GTP or GDP constitutes a selective switch for Ypt7, but with Ypt7-tm, this switch is only read by HOPS after phosphorylation to P-HOPS by its physiological kinase Yck3. The prenyl anchor of Ypt7 allows both HOPS and P-HOPS to be regulated by Ypt7-bound guanine nucleotide.

Asymmetric Rab activation of vacuolar HOPS to catalyze SNARE complex assembly

Intracellular membrane fusion requires Rab-family GTPases, their effector tethers, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins, and SNARE chaperones of the Sec1/Munc18 (SM), Sec17/α-SNAP, and Sec18/NSF families. We have developed an assay using fluorescence resonance energy transfer to measure SNARE complex formation in real time. We now show that yeast vacuolar SNAREs assemble spontaneously into RQaQbQc complexes when the R- and Qa-SNAREs are concentrated in the same micelles or in cis on the same membrane. When SNAREs are free in solution or are tethered to distinct membranes, assembly requires catalysis by HOPS, the vacuolar SM and tethering complex. The Rab Ypt7 and vacuole lipids together allosterically activate the bound HOPS for catalyzing SNARE assembly, even if none of the SNAREs are membrane bound. HOPS-dependent fusion between proteoliposomes bearing R- or Qa-SNAREs shows a strict requirement for Ypt7 on the R-SNARE proteoliposomes but not on the Qa-SNARE proteoliposomes. This asymmetry is reflected in the strikingly different capacity of Ypt7 in cis to either the R- or Qa-SNARE to stimulate SNARE complex assembly. Membrane-bound Ypt7 activates HOPS to catalyze 4-SNARE complex assembly when it is on the same membrane as the R-SNARE but not the Qa-SNARE, thus explaining the asymmetric need for Ypt7 for fusion.

FERARI is required for Rab11-dependent endocytic recycling

Endosomal transport is essential for cellular organization and compartmentalization and cell-cell communication. Sorting endosomes provide a crossroads for various trafficking pathways and determine recycling, secretion or degradation of proteins. The organization of these processes requires membrane-tethering factors to coordinate Rab GTPase function with membrane fusion. Here, we report a conserved tethering platform that acts in the Rab11 recycling pathways at sorting endosomes, which we name factors for endosome recycling and Rab interactions (FERARI). The Rab-binding module of FERARI consists of Rab11FIP5 and rabenosyn-5/RABS-5, while the SNARE-interacting module comprises VPS45 and VIPAS39. Unexpectedly, the membrane fission protein EHD1 is also a FERARI component. Thus, FERARI appears to combine fusion activity through the SM protein VPS45 with pinching activity through EHD1 on SNX-1-positive endosomal membranes. We propose that coordination of fusion and pinching through a kiss-and-run mechanism drives cargo at endosomes into recycling pathways.

HOPS recognizes each SNARE, assembling ternary trans-complexes for rapid fusion upon engagement with the 4th SNARE

Yeast vacuole fusion requires R-SNARE, Q-SNAREs, and HOPS. A HOPS SM-family subunit binds the R- and Qa-SNAREs. We now report that HOPS binds each of the four SNAREs. HOPS catalyzes fusion when the Q-SNAREs are not pre-assembled, ushering them into a functional complex. Co-incubation of HOPS, proteoliposomes bearing R-SNARE, and proteoliposomes with any two Q-SNAREs yields a rapid-fusion complex with 3 SNAREs in a trans-assembly. The missing Q-SNARE then induces sudden fusion. HOPS can 'template' SNARE complex assembly through SM recognition of R- and Qa-SNAREs. Though the Qa-SNARE is essential for spontaneous SNARE assembly, HOPS also assembles a rapid-fusion complex between R- and QbQc-SNARE proteoliposomes in the absence of Qa-SNARE, awaiting Qa for fusion. HOPS-dependent fusion is saturable at low concentrations of each Q-SNARE, showing binding site functionality. HOPS thus tethers membranes and recognizes each SNARE, assembling R+Qa or R+QbQc rapid fusion intermediates.

Phosphatidic acid induces conformational changes in Sec18 protomers that prevent SNARE priming

Eukaryotic cell homeostasis requires transfer of cellular components among organelles and relies on membrane fusion catalyzed by SNARE proteins. Inactive SNARE bundles are reactivated by hexameric N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor, vesicle-fusing ATPase (Sec18/NSF)-driven disassembly that enables a new round of membrane fusion. We previously found that phosphatidic acid (PA) binds Sec18 and thereby sequesters it from SNAREs and that PA dephosphorylation dissociates Sec18 from the membrane, allowing it to engage SNARE complexes. We now report that PA also induces conformational changes in Sec18 protomers and that hexameric Sec18 cannot bind PA membranes. Molecular dynamics (MD) analyses revealed that the D1 and D2 domains of Sec18 contain PA-binding sites and that the residues needed for PA binding are masked in hexameric Sec18. Importantly, these simulations also disclosed that a major conformational change occurs in the linker region between the D1 and D2 domains, which is distinct from the conformational changes that occur in hexameric Sec18 during SNARE priming. Together, these findings indicate that PA regulates Sec18 function by altering its architecture and stabilizing membrane-bound Sec18 protomers.

Reconstituted Proteoliposome Fusion Mediated by Yeast SNARE-Family Proteins

Membrane fusion mediated by SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor)-family proteins is an essential process for intracellular membrane trafficking in all eukaryotic cells, which delivers proteins and lipids to their appropriate subcellular membrane compartments such as organelles and plasma membrane. The molecular basis of SNARE-mediated membrane fusion has been revealed by studying fusion of reconstituted proteoliposomes bearing purified SNARE-family proteins and chemically defined lipid species. This chapter describes the detailed experimental protocols for (1) purification of recombinant SNARE-family and SM (Sec1/Munc18-family) proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae; (2) preparation of reconstituted proteoliposomes bearing purified yeast SNARE proteins; and (3) developing an assay to monitor lipid mixing between reconstituted SNARE-bearing proteoliposomes. Lipid mixing assays for reconstituted SNARE-bearing proteoliposomes are useful for evaluating the intrinsic capacity of SNARE-family proteins to directly catalyze membrane fusion and to determine the specificity of membrane fusion.

Rab-Effector-Kinase Interplay Modulates Intralumenal Fragment Formation during Vacuole Fusion

Upon vacuolar lysosome (or vacuole) fusion in S. cerevisiae, a portion of membrane is internalized and catabolized. Formation of this intralumenal fragment (ILF) is important for organelle protein and lipid homeostasis and remodeling. But how ILF formation is optimized for membrane turnover is not understood. Here, we show that fewer ILFs form when the interaction between the Rab-GTPase Ypt7 and its effector Vps41 (a subunit of the tethering complex HOPS) is interrupted by a point mutation (Ypt7-D44N). Subsequent phosphorylation of Vps41 by the casein kinase Yck3 prevents stabilization of trans-SNARE complexes needed for lipid bilayer pore formation. Impairing ILF formation prevents clearance of misfolded proteins from vacuole membranes and promotes organelle permeability and cell death. We propose that HOPS coordinates Rab, kinase, and SNARE cycles to modulate ILF size during vacuole fusion, regulating lipid and protein turnover important for quality control and membrane integrity.

A novel in vitro assay reveals SNARE topology and the role of Ykt6 in autophagosome fusion with vacuoles

Autophagosome fusion with vacuoles requires a conserved fusion machinery, though the topology remained unclear. Two papers in this issue, Bas et al. and Gao et al., uncover Ykt6 as the required autophagosomal SNARE.

Autophagy is a catabolic pathway that delivers intracellular material to the mammalian lysosomes or the yeast and plant vacuoles. The final step in this process is the fusion of autophagosomes with vacuoles, which requires SNARE proteins, the homotypic vacuole fusion and protein sorting tethering complex, the RAB7-like Ypt7 GTPase, and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Mon1-Ccz1. Where these different components are located and function during fusion, however, remains to be fully understood. Here, we present a novel in vitro assay to monitor fusion of intact and functional autophagosomes with vacuoles. This process requires ATP, physiological temperature, and the entire fusion machinery to tether and fuse autophagosomes with vacuoles. Importantly, we uncover Ykt6 as the autophagosomal SNARE. Our assay and findings thus provide the tools to dissect autophagosome completion and fusion in a test tube.

Assembly of intermediates for rapid membrane fusion

Membrane fusion is essential for intracellular protein sorting, cell growth, hormone secretion, and neurotransmission. Rapid membrane fusion requires tethering and Sec1-Munc18 (SM) function to catalyze R-, Qa-, Qb-, and Qc-SNARE complex assembly in trans, as well as SNARE engagement by the SNARE-binding chaperone Sec17/αSNAP. The hexameric vacuolar HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting) complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae tethers membranes through its affinities for the membrane Rab GTPase Ypt7. HOPS also has specific affinities for the vacuolar SNAREs and catalyzes SNARE complex assembly, but the order of their assembly into a 4-SNARE complex is unclear. We now report defined assembly intermediates on the path to membrane fusion. We found that a prefusion intermediate will assemble with HOPS and the R, Qa, and Qc SNAREs, and that this assembly undergoes rapid fusion upon addition of Qb and Sec17. HOPS-tethered membranes and all four vacuolar SNAREs formed a complex that underwent an even more dramatic burst of fusion upon Sec17p addition. These findings provide initial insights into an ordered fusion pathway consisting of the following intermediates and events: 1) Rab- and HOPS-tethered membranes, 2) a HOPS:R:Qa:Qc trans-complex, 3) a HOPS:4-SNARE trans-complex, 4) an engagement with Sec17, and 5) the rapid lipid rearrangements during fusion. In conclusion, our results indicate that the R:Qa:Qc complex forms in the context of membrane, Ypt7, HOPS, and trans-SNARE assembly and serves as a functional intermediate for rapid fusion after addition of the Qb-SNARE and Sec17 proteins.

A tethering complex drives the terminal stage of SNARE-dependent membrane fusion

Membrane fusion in eukaryotic cells mediates the biogenesis of organelles, vesicular traffic between them, and exo- and endocytosis of important signalling molecules, such as hormones and neurotransmitters. Distinct tasks in intracellular membrane fusion have been assigned to conserved protein systems. Tethering proteins mediate the initial recognition and attachment of membranes, whereas SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) protein complexes are considered as the core fusion engine. SNARE complexes provide mechanical energy to distort membranes and drive them through a hemifusion intermediate towards the formation of a fusion pore. This last step is highly energy-demanding. Here we combine the in vivo and in vitro fusion of yeast vacuoles with molecular simulations to show that tethering proteins are critical for overcoming the final energy barrier to fusion pore formation. SNAREs alone drive vacuoles only into the hemifused state. Tethering proteins greatly increase the volume of SNARE complexes and deform the site of hemifusion, which lowers the energy barrier for pore opening and provides the driving force. Thereby, tethering proteins assume a crucial mechanical role in the terminal stage of membrane fusion that is likely to be conserved at multiple steps of vesicular traffic. We therefore propose that SNAREs and tethering proteins should be considered as a single, non-dissociable device that drives fusion. The core fusion machinery may then be larger and more complex than previously thought.

Sec17 (α-SNAP) and an SM-tethering complex regulate the outcome of SNARE zippering in vitro and in vivo

Zippering of SNARE complexes spanning docked membranes is essential for most intracellular fusion events. Here, we explore how SNARE regulators operate on discrete zippering states. The formation of a metastable trans-complex, catalyzed by HOPS and its SM subunit Vps33, is followed by subsequent zippering transitions that increase the probability of fusion. Operating independently of Sec18 (NSF) catalysis, Sec17 (α-SNAP) either inhibits or stimulates SNARE-mediated fusion. If HOPS or Vps33 are absent, Sec17 inhibits fusion at an early stage. Thus, Vps33/HOPS promotes productive SNARE assembly in the presence of otherwise inhibitory Sec17. Once SNAREs are partially zipped, Sec17 promotes fusion in either the presence or absence of HOPS, but with faster kinetics when HOPS is absent, suggesting that ejection of the SM is a rate-limiting step.

Sec17/Sec18 act twice, enhancing membrane fusion and then disassembling cis-SNARE complexes

At physiological protein levels, the slow HOPS- and SNARE-dependent fusion which occurs upon complete SNARE zippering is stimulated by Sec17 and Sec18:ATP without requiring ATP hydrolysis. To stimulate, Sec17 needs its central residues which bind the 0-layer of the SNARE complex and its N-terminal apolar loop. Adding a transmembrane anchor to the N-terminus of Sec17 bypasses this requirement for apolarity of the Sec17 loop, suggesting that the loop functions for membrane binding rather than to trigger bilayer rearrangement. In contrast, when complete C-terminal SNARE zippering is prevented, fusion strictly requires Sec18 and Sec17, and the Sec17 apolar loop has functions beyond membrane anchoring. Thus Sec17 and Sec18 act twice in the fusion cycle, binding to trans-SNARE complexes to accelerate fusion, then hydrolyzing ATP to disassemble cis-SNARE complexes.

A short region upstream of the yeast vacuolar Qa-SNARE heptad-repeats promotes membrane fusion through enhanced SNARE complex assembly

Membrane fusion requires that four SNARE domains form a complex. A short conserved region just upstream of the Qa-SNARE heptad-repeat domain promotes SNARE-complex assembly and hence fusion.

Whereas SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) heptad-repeats are well studied, SNAREs also have upstream N-domains of indeterminate function. The assembly of yeast vacuolar SNAREs into complexes for fusion can be studied in chemically defined reactions. Complementary proteoliposomes bearing a Rab:GTP and either the vacuolar R-SNARE or one of the three integrally anchored Q-SNAREs were incubated with the tethering/SM protein complex HOPS and the two other soluble SNAREs (lacking a transmembrane anchor) or their SNARE heptad-repeat domains. Fusion required a transmembrane-anchored R-SNARE on one membrane and an anchored Q-SNARE on the other. The N-domain of the Qb-SNARE was completely dispensable for fusion. Whereas fusion can be promoted by very high concentrations of the Qa-SNARE heptad-repeat domain alone, at physiological concentrations the Qa-SNARE heptad-repeat domain alone has almost no fusion activity. The 181–198 region of Qa, immediately upstream of the SNARE heptad-repeat domain, is required for normal fusion activity with HOPS. This region is needed for normal SNARE complex assembly.

HOPS catalyzes the interdependent assembly of each vacuolar SNARE into a SNARE complex

Sec1/Munc18 proteins are essential for fusion but of unknown function. The yeast vacuole SM protein is a subunit of the HOPS tethering complex. HOPS catalyzes the interdependent association among the vacuole SNAREs at a membrane surface, and the associated SNAREs can be disassembled by the physiological system Sec17/Sec18/ATP.

Rab GTPases, their effectors, SNAREs of the R, Qa, Qb, and Qc families, and SM SNARE-binding proteins catalyze intracellular membrane fusion. At the vacuole/lysosome, they are integrated by the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex. Two HOPS subunits bind vacuolar Rabs for tethering, another binds the Qc SNARE, and a fourth HOPS subunit, an SM protein, has conserved grooves that bind R- and Qa-SNARE domains. Spontaneous quaternary SNARE complex assembly is very slow. We report an assay of SNARE complex assembly that does not rely on fusion and for which tethering does not coenrich the four SNAREs. HOPS is required in this assay for rapid SNARE complex assembly. Optimal assembly needs HOPS, lipid membranes to which the R- or Qa-SNARE and Ypt7:GTP are integrally bound, and each of the other three SNAREs. Each SNARE assembles into this complex relying on the others, suggesting four-SNARE complex assembly rather than direct binding of each to HOPS. SNAREs can be disassociated by Sec 17/Sec 18/ATP, completing a catalyzed cycle of SNARE assembly and disassembly.

Sec3 promotes the initial binary t-SNARE complex assembly and membrane fusion

The soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) constitute the core machinery for membrane fusion during eukaryotic cell vesicular trafficking. However, how the assembly of the SNARE complex is initiated is unknown. Here we report that Sec3, a component of the exocyst complex that mediates vesicle tethering during exocytosis, directly interacts with the t-SNARE protein Sso2. This interaction promotes the formation of an Sso2-Sec9 'binary' t-SNARE complex, the early rate-limiting step in SNARE complex assembly, and stimulates membrane fusion. The crystal structure of the Sec3-Sso2 complex suggests that Sec3 binding induces conformational changes of Sso2 that are crucial for the relief of its auto-inhibition. Interestingly, specific disruption of the Sec3-Sso2 interaction in cells blocks exocytosis without affecting the function of Sec3 in vesicle tethering. Our study reveals an activation mechanism for SNARE complex assembly, and uncovers a role of the exocyst in promoting membrane fusion in addition to vesicle tethering.

How and why intralumenal membrane fragments form during vacuolar lysosome fusion

Lysosomal membrane fusion mediates the last step of the autophagy and endocytosis pathways and supports organelle remodeling and biogenesis. Because fusogenic proteins and lipids concentrate in a ring at the vertex between apposing organelle membranes, the encircled area of membrane can be severed and internalized within the lumen as a fragment upon lipid bilayer fusion. How or why this intralumenal fragment forms during fusion, however, is not entirely clear. To better understand this process, we studied fragment formation during homotypic vacuolar lysosome membrane fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using cell-free fusion assays and light microscopy, we find that GTPase activation and trans-SNARE complex zippering have opposing effects on fragment formation and verify that this affects the morphology of the fusion product and regulates transporter protein degradation. We show that fragment formwation is limited by stalk expansion, a key intermediate of the lipid bilayer fusion reaction. Using electron microscopy, we present images of hemifusion diaphragms that form as stalks expand and propose a model describing how the fusion machinery regulates fragment formation during lysosome fusion to control morphology and protein lifetimes.

Improved reconstitution of yeast vacuole fusion with physiological SNARE concentrations reveals an asymmetric Rab(GTP) requirement

In vitro reconstitution is a powerful approach to deciphering membrane fusion. However, current reconstitutions do not adequately mimic the physiological process. This study takes a big step toward overcoming those shortcomings, achieving fusion with SNARE densities comparable to the native membrane.

In vitro reconstitution of homotypic yeast vacuole fusion from purified components enables detailed study of membrane fusion mechanisms. Current reconstitutions have yet to faithfully replicate the fusion process in at least three respects: 1) The density of SNARE proteins required for fusion in vitro is substantially higher than on the organelle. 2) Substantial lysis accompanies reconstituted fusion. 3) The Rab GTPase Ypt7 is essential in vivo but often dispensable in vitro. Here we report that changes in fatty acyl chain composition dramatically lower the density of SNAREs that are required for fusion. By providing more physiological lipids with a lower phase transition temperature, we achieved efficient fusion with SNARE concentrations as low as on the native organelle. Although fused proteoliposomes became unstable at elevated SNARE concentrations, releasing their content after fusion had occurred, reconstituted proteoliposomes with substantially reduced SNARE concentrations fused without concomitant lysis. The Rab GTPase Ypt7 is essential on both membranes for proteoliposome fusion to occur at these SNARE concentrations. Strikingly, it was only critical for Ypt7 to be GTP loaded on membranes bearing the R-SNARE Nyv1, whereas the bound nucleotide of Ypt7 was irrelevant on membranes bearing the Q-SNAREs Vam3 and Vti1.

Organelle acidification negatively regulates vacuole membrane fusion in vivo

The V-ATPase is a proton pump consisting of a membrane-integral V0 sector and a peripheral V1 sector, which carries the ATPase activity. In vitro studies of yeast vacuole fusion and evidence from worms, flies, zebrafish and mice suggested that V0 interacts with the SNARE machinery for membrane fusion, that it promotes the induction of hemifusion and that this activity requires physical presence of V0 rather than its proton pump activity. A recent in vivo study in yeast has challenged these interpretations, concluding that fusion required solely lumenal acidification but not the V0 sector itself. Here, we identify the reasons for this discrepancy and reconcile it. We find that acute pharmacological or physiological inhibition of V-ATPase pump activity de-acidifies the vacuole lumen in living yeast cells within minutes. Time-lapse microscopy revealed that de-acidification induces vacuole fusion rather than inhibiting it. Cells expressing mutated V0 subunits that maintain vacuolar acidity were blocked in this fusion. Thus, proton pump activity of the V-ATPase negatively regulates vacuole fusion in vivo. Vacuole fusion in vivo does, however, require physical presence of a fusion-competent V0 sector.

The Secret Life of Tethers: The Role of Tethering Factors in SNARE Complex Regulation

Trafficking in eukaryotic cells is a tightly regulated process to ensure correct cargo delivery to the proper destination organelle or plasma membrane. In this review, we focus on how the vesicle fusion machinery, the SNARE complex, is regulated by the interplay of the multisubunit tethering complexes (MTC) with the SNAREs and Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins. Although these factors are used in different stages of membrane trafficking, e.g., Golgi to plasma membrane transport vs. vacuolar fusion, and in a variety of diverse eukaryotic cell types, many commonalities between their functions are being revealed. We explore the various protein-protein interactions and findings from functional reconstitution studies in order to highlight both their common features and the differences in their modes of regulation. These studies serve as a starting point for mechanistic explorations in other systems.

A direct role for the Sec1/Munc18-family protein Vps33 as a template for SNARE assembly

Fusion of intracellular transport vesicles requires soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) and Sec1/Munc18-family (SM) proteins. Membrane-bridging SNARE complexes are critical for fusion, but their spontaneous assembly is inefficient and may require SM proteins in vivo. We report x-ray structures of Vps33, the SM subunit of the yeast homotypic fusion and vacuole protein-sorting (HOPS) complex, bound to two individual SNAREs. The two SNAREs, one from each membrane, are held in the correct orientation and register for subsequent complex assembly. Vps33 and potentially other SM proteins could thus act as templates for generating partially zipped SNARE assembly intermediates. HOPS was essential to mediate SNARE complex assembly at physiological SNARE concentrations. Thus, Vps33 appears to catalyze SNARE complex assembly through specific SNARE motif recognition.

The HOPS/class C Vps complex tethers membranes by binding to one Rab GTPase in each apposed membrane

Many Rab GTPase effectors are membrane-tethering factors, that is, they physically link two apposed membranes before intracellular membrane fusion. In this study, we investigate the distinct binding factors needed on apposed membranes for Rab effector-dependent tethering. We show that the homotypic fusion and protein-sorting/class C vacuole protein-sorting (HOPS/class C Vps) complex can tether low-curvature membranes, that is, liposomes with a diameter of ∼100 nm, only when the yeast vacuolar Rab GTPase Ypt7p is present in both tethered membranes. When HOPS is phosphorylated by the vacuolar casein kinase I, Yck3p, tethering only takes place when GTP-bound Ypt7p is present in both tethered membranes. When HOPS is not phosphorylated, however, its tethering activity shows little specificity for the nucleotide-binding state of Ypt7p. These results suggest a model for HOPS-mediated tethering in which HOPS tethers membranes by binding to Ypt7p in each of the two tethered membranes. Moreover, because vacuole-associated HOPS is presumably phosphorylated by Yck3p, our results suggest that nucleotide exchange of Ypt7p on multivesicular bodies (MVBs)/late endosomes must take place before HOPS can mediate tethering at vacuoles.

Sec17 can trigger fusion of trans-SNARE paired membranes without Sec18

Sec17 [soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein; α-SNAP] and Sec18 (NSF) perform ATP-dependent disassembly of cis-SNARE complexes, liberating SNAREs for subsequent assembly of trans-complexes for fusion. A mutant of Sec17, with limited ability to stimulate Sec18, still strongly enhanced fusion when ample Sec18 was supplied, suggesting that Sec17 has additional functions. We used fusion reactions where the four SNAREs were initially separate, thus requiring no disassembly by Sec18. With proteoliposomes bearing asymmetrically disposed SNAREs, tethering and trans-SNARE pairing allowed slow fusion. Addition of Sec17 did not affect the levels of trans-SNARE complex but triggered sudden fusion of trans-SNARE paired proteoliposomes. Sec18 did not substitute for Sec17 in triggering fusion, but ADP- or ATPγS-bound Sec18 enhanced this Sec17 function. The extent of the Sec17 effect varied with the lipid headgroup and fatty acyl composition of the proteoliposomes. Two mutants further distinguished the two Sec17 functions: Sec17(L291A,L292A) did not stimulate Sec18 to disassemble cis-SNARE complex but triggered the fusion of trans-SNARE paired membranes. Sec17(F21S,M22S), with diminished apolar character to its hydrophobic loop, fully supported Sec18-mediated SNARE complex disassembly but had lost the capacity to stimulate the fusion of trans-SNARE paired membranes. To model the interactions of SNARE-bound Sec17 with membranes, we show that Sec17, but not Sec17(F21S,M22S), interacted synergistically with the soluble SNARE domains to enable their stable association with liposomes. We propose a model in which Sec17 binds to trans-SNARE complexes, oligomerizes, and inserts apolar loops into the apposed membranes, locally disturbing the lipid bilayer and thereby lowering the energy barrier for fusion.

Munc18a does not alter fusion rates mediated by neuronal SNAREs, synaptotagmin, and complexin

Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins are essential for membrane trafficking, but their molecular mechanism remains unclear. Using a single vesicle-vesicle content-mixing assay with reconstituted neuronal SNAREs, synaptotagmin-1, and complexin-1, we show that the neuronal SM protein Munc18a/nSec1 has no effect on the intrinsic kinetics of both spontaneous fusion and Ca²⁺-triggered fusion between vesicles that mimic synaptic vesicles and the plasma membrane. However, wild type Munc18a reduced vesicle association ∼50% when the vesicles bearing the t-SNAREs syntaxin-1A and SNAP-25 were preincubated with Munc18 for 30 min. Single molecule experiments with labeled SNAP-25 indicate that the reduction of vesicle association is a consequence of sequestration of syntaxin-1A by Munc18a and subsequent release of SNAP-25 (i.e. Munc18a captures syntaxin-1A via its high affinity interaction). Moreover, a phosphorylation mimic mutant of Munc18a with reduced affinity to syntaxin-1A results in less reduction of vesicle association. In summary, Munc18a does not directly affect fusion, although it has an effect on the t-SNARE complex, depending on the presence of other factors and experimental conditions. Our results suggest that Munc18a primarily acts at the prefusion stage.

Yeast vacuolar HOPS, regulated by its kinase, exploits affinities for acidic lipids and Rab:GTP for membrane binding and to catalyze tethering and fusion

Acidic lipids act as coreceptors with Ypt7p to bind the HOPS complex to support membrane tethering and fusion. After phosphorylation by the vacuolar kinase Yck3p, phospho-HOPS needs both Ypt7p:GTP and acidic lipids to support fusion.

Fusion of yeast vacuoles requires the Rab GTPase Ypt7p, four SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptors), the SNARE disassembly chaperones Sec17p/Sec18p, vacuolar lipids, and the Rab-effector complex HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting). Two HOPS subunits have direct affinity for Ypt7p. Although vacuolar fusion has been reconstituted with purified components, the functional relationships between individual lipids and Ypt7p:GTP have remained unclear. We now report that acidic lipids function with Ypt7p as coreceptors for HOPS, supporting membrane tethering and fusion. After phosphorylation by the vacuolar kinase Yck3p, phospho-HOPS needs both Ypt7p:GTP and acidic lipids to support fusion.

Rab proteins and the compartmentalization of the endosomal system

Of the approximately 70 human Rab GTPases, nearly three-quarters are involved in endocytic trafficking. Significant plasticity in endosomal membrane transport pathways is closely coupled to receptor signaling and Rab GTPase-regulated scaffolds. Here we review current literature pertaining to endocytic Rab GTPase localizations, functions, and coordination with regulatory proteins and effectors. The roles of Rab GTPases in (1) compartmentalization of the endocytic pathway into early, recycling, late, and lysosomal routes; (2) coordination of individual transport steps from vesicle budding to fusion; (3) effector interactomes; and (4) integration of GTPase and signaling cascades are discussed.

Rab proteins and the compartmentalization of the endosomal system

Of the approximately 70 human Rab GTPases, nearly three-quarters are involved in endocytic trafficking. Significant plasticity in endosomal membrane transport pathways is closely coupled to receptor signaling and Rab GTPase-regulated scaffolds. Here we review current literature pertaining to endocytic Rab GTPase localizations, functions, and coordination with regulatory proteins and effectors. The roles of Rab GTPases in (1) compartmentalization of the endocytic pathway into early, recycling, late, and lysosomal routes; (2) coordination of individual transport steps from vesicle budding to fusion; (3) effector interactomes; and (4) integration of GTPase and signaling cascades are discussed.

The Vps39-like TRAP1 is an effector of Rab5 and likely the missing Vps3 subunit of human CORVET

Membrane fusion in the endocytic pathway is mediated by a protein machinery consistent of Rab GTPases, tethering factors and SNAREs. In yeast, the endosomal CORVET and lysosomal HOPS tethering complexes share 4 of their 6 subunits. The 2 additional subunits in each complex - Vps3 and Vps8 for CORVET, and the homologous Vps39 and Vps41 for HOPS - bind directly to Rab5 and Rab7, respectively. In humans, all subunits for HOPS have been described. However, human CORVET remains poorly characterized and a homolog of Vps3 is still missing. Here we characterize 2 previously identified Vps39 isoforms, hVps39-1/hVam6/TLP and hVps39-2/TRAP1, in yeast and HEK293 cells. None of them can compensate the loss of the endogenous yeast Vps39, though the specific interaction of hVps39-1 with the virus-specific LT protein was reproduced. Both human Vps39 proteins show a cytosolic localization in yeast and mammalian cells. However, hVps39-2/TRAP1 strongly co-localizes with co-expressed Rab5 and interacts directly with Rab5-GTP in vitro. We conclude that hVps39-2/TRAP1 is an endosomal protein and an effector of Rab5, suggesting a role of the protein as a subunit of the putative human CORVET complex.

Loss of the Sec1/Munc18-family proteins VPS-33.2 and VPS-33.1 bypasses a block in endosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans

Evidence is presented for the existence of HOPS and CORVET tethering complexes in metazoans. A role is shown for the SM protein components of tethers in controlling the flux of material through the endosomal system.

The end of the life of a transport vesicle requires a complex series of tethering, docking, and fusion events. Tethering complexes play a crucial role in the recognition of membrane entities and bringing them into close opposition, thereby coordinating and controlling cellular trafficking events. Here we provide a comprehensive RNA interference analysis of the CORVET and HOPS tethering complexes in metazoans. Knockdown of CORVET components promoted RAB-7 recruitment to subapical membranes, whereas in HOPS knockdowns, RAB-5 was found also on membrane structures close to the cell center, indicating the RAB conversion might be impaired in the absence of these tethering complexes. Unlike in yeast, metazoans have two VPS33 homologues, which are Sec1/Munc18 (SM)-family proteins involved in the regulation of membrane fusion. We assume that in wild type, each tethering complex contains a specific SM protein but that they may be able to substitute for each other in case of absence of the other. Of importance, knockdown of both SM proteins allowed bypass of the endosome maturation block in sand-1 mutants. We propose a model in which the SM proteins in tethering complexes are required for coordinated flux of material through the endosomal system.

A distinct tethering step is vital for vacuole membrane fusion

Past experiments with reconstituted proteoliposomes, employing assays that infer membrane fusion from fluorescent lipid dequenching, have suggested that vacuolar SNAREs alone suffice to catalyze membrane fusion in vitro. While we could replicate these results, we detected very little fusion with the more rigorous assay of lumenal compartment mixing. Exploring the discrepancies between lipid-dequenching and content-mixing assays, we surprisingly found that the disposition of the fluorescent lipids with respect to SNAREs had a striking effect. Without other proteins, the association of SNAREs in trans causes lipid dequenching that cannot be ascribed to fusion or hemifusion. Tethering of the SNARE-bearing proteoliposomes was required for efficient lumenal compartment mixing. While the physiological HOPS tethering complex caused a few-fold increase of trans-SNARE association, the rate of content mixing increased more than 100-fold. Thus tethering has a role in promoting membrane fusion that extends beyond simply increasing the amount of total trans-SNARE complex.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03251.001

Cells of higher organisms contain compartments called organelles and structures called vesicles that transfer molecules and proteins between these organelles. Each organelle and each vesicle is enclosed within a membrane, and these membranes must fuse together to allow these transfers to take place. A certain group of proteins, called SNAREs, have a central role in these fusion events.

Since membrane fusion is difficult to observe directly, many researchers have used a method called ‘fluorescent lipid dequenching’ to study it indirectly. In this approach, one fraction of vesicles is labeled with two fluorescent molecules, with one of these molecules quenching the fluorescence of the other. However, when a labeled vesicle fuses with an unlabeled vesicle, the surface concentrations of the fluorescent molecules are diluted. This reduces the amount of quenching and the resulting increase in fluorescence can be measured.

Experiments utilizing this technique had suggested that SNARE proteins are sufficient for fusion to take place, and that no other protein complexes need to be present. However, when a different assay method called ‘lumenal compartment mixing’ was used, little fusion was seen when the only proteins present were the SNAREs. The lumenal compartment mixing approach relies on measuring the degree of mixing between the contents of two vesicles.

To address these conflicting results, Zick and Wickner used both methods to study fusion in a yeast-based system. The lumenal compartment mixing approach, which is the more reliable method, revealed that rapid and efficient membrane fusion in fact requires another protein complex, called HOPS, to hold the two membrane vesicles together.

Zick and Wickner found that the HOPS complex does not enable fusion by just increasing the amount of interactions between the SNARE proteins. Rather, it seems to facilitate the formation of a particular quality of SNARE interactions. Future work is needed to work out how the SNARE complexes become ‘fusion-competent’, and to explore the mechanism that allows the HOPS complex to assist in the formation of fusion-competent SNARE complexes.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03251.002