Long-term effect of a 24-week multicomponent intervention on physical performance and frailty in community-dwelling older adults

Evaluation of deprescribing services in frail patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing, a process of dose reduction or withdrawal of inappropriate medication that no longer has benefit, is a proposed intervention in the care of older adults living with frailty.

OBJECTIVE/AIM

To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and clinical impact of deprescribing services in frail patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in November 2023 using Scopus, CINAHL PLUS (EBSCO), MEDLINE (OVID and EMBASE), and Cochrane Library. The Mixed Methods Appraisal tool was used for appraising the methodological quality of the included papers. Studies were selected after title, abstract, and full-text screening, with independent review. Thematic analysis was used for analysing data from the selected articles.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety unique titles were identified, with nine (six trials, one interview, one survey, and one designed-delay study) meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four main descriptive themes have been identified: challenges of deprescribing in frailty, facilitators of deprescribing in frailty, deprescribing processes in current practice in frail patients, and deprescribing outcomes. Additionally, two analytical themes have been identified: safety and quality.

CONCLUSION

A number of issues have been highlighted that impact the implementation of deprescribing services in frail patients. Currently, there is limited evidence showing strong benefits of such deprescribing services, such as reducing the number of potentially inappropriate medications and medication costs.

Associations Between Deficit Accumulation Frailty and Baseline Markers of Lifestyle in the U.S. POINTER Trial

BACKGROUND

Multidomain lifestyle interventions may have the potential to slow biological aging as captured by deficit accumulation frailty indices. We describe the distribution and composition of the 49-component frailty index developed by the U.S. POINTER clinical trial team of investigators and assess its cross-sectional associations with sociodemographic factors and markers chosen to be representative of behaviors targeted by the trial's multidomain interventions.

METHODS

We draw baseline data from the 2 111 volunteers enrolled in U.S. POINTER who were ages 60-79 years and at increased risk for cognitive decline. Frailty components were grouped into 9 domains. Associations that frailty index scores and their domains had with behavioral markers were described with correlations and canonical correlation.

RESULTS

The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the frailty index score distribution were 0.153, 0.189, and 0.235. Higher frailty scores tended to occur among individuals who were older, male, and living in areas of greater deprivation (all p < .001). They were also associated with poorer self-reported diet, less physical activity, and higher Framingham risk scores (all p < .001). Associations were diffusely distributed among the frailty component domains, indicating that no individual domain was dominating associations.

CONCLUSIONS

The U.S. POINTER deficit accumulation frailty index had expected relationships with sociodemographic factors and sensitivity to the behaviors targeted by the trial's interventions. Our analysis supports its use as a secondary outcome to assess whether the multidomain interventions differentially impact an established marker of biological aging. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03688126.

Development of a Complex Intervention for Promoting Participation in Resistance Exercise Among Community-Dwelling Frail Older Adults in China: A Multimethod Qualitative Study

Background and Objectives

Regular resistance exercise (RE) showed a promising effect in reducing frailty in older adults. However, the participation of RE among this population remains low. This study was, therefore, aimed at developing a complex intervention tailored to community-dwelling frail older adults in China to promote participation in RE and reduce frailty ultimately.

Research Design and Methods

Using a multimethods qualitative study design, this study included 2 parts: (1) a qualitative study was performed to explore barriers and facilitators for participation in RE among frail older adults through stakeholder interviews. The interview was guided by the comprehensive framework of implementation research; (2) two rounds of expert consultation, guided by the social cognitive theory, were conducted to identify the key barriers and facilitators, and corresponding implementation strategies for promoting participation in RE. A complex intervention was developed accordingly.

Results

Interviews were conducted with 16 frail older adults (mean age = 72.9) and 10 community workers (mean working years = 11.2). A total of 10 barriers and 16 facilitators were identified; safety concerns, decline in physical function, and lack of knowledge were frequently mentioned barriers, while health needs, social support, and professional guidance were common facilitators. Then 10 experts (mean working years = 20.9) were consulted to determine the main barriers and facilitators, and a list of corresponding implementation strategies was developed subsequently. Thus, a tailored complex intervention delivered by community workers in the community setting, including the core component of "group elastic-band RE," and supplementary components of "community education, feedback, goal setting, and reinforcement guidance" was developed.

Discussion and Implications

This study constructed a list of key barriers and facilitators as well as corresponding implementation strategies for promoting participation in RE among community-dwelling frail older adults. A tailored complex intervention was developed accordingly, which will facilitate the management of frail older adults in the Chinese community setting.

Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations among healthcare costs and deficit accumulation

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and overweight/obesity increase healthcare costs. Both are also associated with accelerated aging. However, the contributions of this accelerated aging to increased healthcare costs are unknown.

METHODS

We use data from a 8-year longitudinal cohort followed at 16 U.S. clinical research sites. Participants were adults aged 45-76 years with established type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity who had enrolled in the Action for Health in Diabetes clinical trial. They were randomly (1:1) assigned to either an intensive lifestyle intervention focused on weight loss versus a comparator of diabetes support and education. A validated deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) was used to characterize biological aging. Discounted annual healthcare costs were estimated using national databases in 2012 dollars. Descriptive characteristics were collected by trained and certified staff.

RESULTS

Compared with participants in the lowest tertile (least frail) of baseline FI, those in the highest tertile (most frail) at Year 1 averaged $714 (42%) higher medication costs, $244 (22%) higher outpatient costs, and $800 (134%) higher hospitalization costs (p < 0.001). At Years 4 and 8, relatively greater increases in FI (third vs. first tertile) were associated with an approximate doubling of total healthcare costs (p < 0.001). Mean (95% confidence interval) relative annual savings in healthcare costs associated with randomization to the intensive lifestyle intervention were $437 ($195, $579) per year during Years 1-4 and $461 ($232, $690) per year during Years 1-8. These were attenuated and the 95% confidence interval no longer excluded $0 after adjustment for the annual FI differences from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Deficit accumulation frailty tracks well with healthcare costs among adults with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity. It may serve as a useful marker to project healthcare needs and as an intermediate outcome in clinical trials.

Effectiveness of interventions to prevent or reverse pre-frailty and frailty in middle-aged community dwelling adults: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Frailty, marked by diminished physiological capacity and higher health risks, is less understood in middle-aged individuals (40-65 years) than older adults. This review synthesises intervention studies for pre-frailty and frailty in this demographic, assessing effectiveness, feasibility, and implementation factors including participant experience and cost-effectiveness.

METHOD

Registered on the Open Science Framework and adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) guidelines, this review searched six databases for interventions targeting middle-aged adults. Dual screening, data extraction, risk assessment, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty evaluation were conducted. Findings were narratively synthesized due to heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eight studies (2018-2023) with 2838 participants were included. Resistance training and multicomponent exercise reduced frailty; though, not always significantly. Low-intensity exercises and education-based interventions yielded mixed results, suggesting a need for further research. Positive participant experiences and cost-effectiveness of interventions such as resistance training and educational interventions supports their feasibility. Varying quality, methodologies and levels of bias indicated a need for more rigorous future research.

DISCUSSION

This review reveals an evidence gap in middle-aged frailty interventions. Multicomponent interventions and resistance training showed promise, but their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Educational and low-intensity interventions need further research to establish their effectiveness. The findings diverge from those in older adults, emphasising the need for age-specific approaches. Future studies should employ higher-quality methods and explore emerging technologies to enhance intervention effectiveness for pre-frailty and frailty in middle-aged adults.

Sarcopenia as the Mobility Phenotype of Aging: Clinical Implications

Sarcopenia, which is characterized by an age-related decline in muscle mass and function, poses significant challenges to geriatric care. Its definition has evolved from muscle-specific criteria to include muscle mass, muscle function, and physical performance, recognizing sarcopenia as a physical frailty. Sarcopenia is associated with adverse outcomes, including mortality, falls, fractures, cognitive decline, and admission to long-term care facilities. Neuromechanical factors, protein-energy balance, and muscle protein synthesis-breakdown mechanisms contribute to its pathophysiology. The identification of sarcopenia involves screening tests and a comprehensive assessment of muscle mass, strength, and physical function. Clinical approaches aligned with the principles of comprehensive geriatric assessment prioritize patient-centered care. This assessment aids in identifying issues related to activities of daily living, cognition, mood, nutrition, and social support, alongside other aspects. The general approach to factors underlying muscle loss and functional decline in patients with sarcopenia includes managing chronic diseases and evaluating administered medications, with interventions including exercise and nutrition, as well as evolving pharmacological options. Ongoing research targeting pathways, such as myostatin-activin and exercise mimetics, holds promise for pharmacological interventions. In summary, sarcopenia requires a multifaceted approach, acknowledging its complex etiology and tailoring interventions to individual patient needs.

Clinical Trials for Special Populations: Children, Older Adults, and Rare Diseases

Research cannot maximize population health unless it improves health for all members of the public, including special populations such as children, older adults, and people living with rare diseases. Each of these categories require special considerations when planning and performing clinical trials, and common threads of ethical conduct of research in vulnerable populations appear throughout. In this review, definitions of each of the three categories of special population (children, older adults, and rare diseases) are discussed in terms of US research regulations, the unique challenges to conducting clinical trials for these special populations, critical ethical issues, and opportunities for innovative ways to design and operationalize clinical trials in special populations. Additional critical attention is focused on factors that influence the generalizability of study results to reduce health disparities, as well as the importance of community engagement and advocacy groups that can help to educate potential trial participants of the benefits of clinical trial participation.

Phenotype validation of the Korean working group on sarcopenia guideline

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to validate the proposed Korean Working Group on Sarcopenia (KWGS) guideline, which introduces the concept of functional sarcopenia, in older Korean adults.

METHODS

Data from the Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area, a longitudinal cohort of community-dwelling older adults, were utilized to compare frailty status and institutionalization-free survival among participants according to sarcopenia status. Based on the KWGS guideline, severe sarcopenia was defined as low muscle mass and strength with slow gait speed; sarcopenia (not severe) was defined as low muscle mass with low muscle strength or slow gait speed; and functional sarcopenia was defined as low muscle strength and slow gait speed without low muscle mass.

RESULTS

Among the 1302 participants, 329 (25.3 %) had severe sarcopenia, 147 (11.3 %) had sarcopenia (not severe), and 277 (21.3 %) had functional sarcopenia. Frailty was significantly greater in participants with any phenotype of sarcopenia than in those without sarcopenia. Additionally, participants with functional sarcopenia were frailer than those with sarcopenia (not severe). Furthermore, the rates of institutionalization and mortality were higher in participants with any phenotype of sarcopenia than in those without sarcopenia. There was no statistical difference between the rates of sarcopenia (not severe) and those with functional sarcopenia. These findings remained consistent after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Each phenotype according to the KWGS guideline was associated with significantly greater frailty and increased risk of institutionalization and mortality. Functional sarcopenia was associated with greater frailty and had comparable prognosis with sarcopenia (not severe).

Multisystem physiological perspective of human frailty and its modulation by physical activity

"Frailty" is a term used to refer to a state characterized by enhanced vulnerability to, and impaired recovery from, stressors compared with a nonfrail state, which is increasingly viewed as a loss of resilience. With increasing life expectancy and the associated rise in years spent with physical frailty, there is a need to understand the clinical and physiological features of frailty and the factors driving it. We describe the clinical definitions of age-related frailty and their limitations in allowing us to understand the pathogenesis of this prevalent condition. Given that age-related frailty manifests in the form of functional declines such as poor balance, falls, and immobility, as an alternative we view frailty from a physiological viewpoint and describe what is known of the organ-based components of frailty, including adiposity, the brain, and neuromuscular, skeletal muscle, immune, and cardiovascular systems, as individual systems and as components in multisystem dysregulation. By doing so we aim to highlight current understanding of the physiological phenotype of frailty and reveal key knowledge gaps and potential mechanistic drivers of the trajectory to frailty. We also review the studies in humans that have intervened with exercise to reduce frailty. We conclude that more longitudinal and interventional clinical studies are required in older adults. Such observational studies should interrogate the progression from a nonfrail to a frail state, assessing individual elements of frailty to produce a deep physiological phenotype of the syndrome. The findings will identify mechanistic drivers of frailty and allow targeted interventions to diminish frailty progression.

Effects of a 24-Week Low-Cost Multicomponent Exercise Program on Health-Related Functional Fitness in the Community-Dwelling Aged and Older Adults

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effects of a low-cost multicomponent exercise program on health-related functional fitness in the community-dwelling aged and older adults. As a second objective, this study compared the exercise program between aged adults (<65 years) and those considered elderly (≥65 years). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight participants were included in the exercise program, and their mean age was 64.73 years (±5.93 years). The Senior Fitness Tests were performed by each participant. A dynamometer was used to assess hand grip strength, and body composition was assessed considering the body mass index. Paired-sample t test was used to compare data at baseline and after the exercise program, considering the total sample. Afterwards, a 2 × 2 analysis of variance was used to examine differences within and between groups. Results: Statistically significant improvements in the chair stand (t = -14.06; p < 0.001; d = 0.42), arm curl (t = -12.10; p < 0.001; d = 0.58), 2 min step test (t = -9.41; p < 0.001; d = 0.24), timed up and go test (t = 5.60; p < 0.001; d = 0.19), and hand grip strength (t = -3.33; p < 0.001; d = 0.15) were observed. There were also significant differences in the back scratch (t = -6.68; p < 0.001; d = 0.18) and chair sit and reach test (t = 5.04; p < 0.001; d = 0.05), as well as body mass index (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that a 24-week low-cost community-based exercise program can improve functional fitness in aged and in older adults. The exercise program supplied the necessary data to construct further randomized controlled trials that can be performed in the community in an environmentally sustainable fashion and applied, not only to the elderly, but also to those transitioning to this age group.

The Effectiveness of Frailty Intervention for Older Patients with Frailty during Hospitalization

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention program on the change in functional status of hospitalized older adults.

DESIGN

This single-arm, prospective, non-randomized interventional study investigates the efficacy of a multidomain interventional program including cognitive stimulation activity, simple exercises, frailty education, and nutrition counseling.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

At a tertiary hospital in southern Taiwan, 352 eligible patients were sequentially enrolled. Included patients were aged ≥65 years (mean age, 79.6 ± 9.0 years; 62% male), scored 3-7 on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and were hospitalized in the geriatric acute ward.

INTERVENTION

Those receiving standard care (physical rehabilitation and nutrition counseling) during January-July 2019 composed the historical control group. Those receiving the multidomain intervention during August-December 2019 composed the intervention group.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the change in activities of daily life (ADL) and frailty status, as assessed by Katz Index and Clinical Frailty Scale, with using the generalized estimating equation model. The length of hospital stay, medical costs, and re-admission rates were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants undergoing intervention (n = 101; 27.9%) showed greater improvements in the ADL and CFS during hospitalization (ADL adjusted estimate, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.11-1.11; p = 0.02; CFS adjusted estimate, -1.11; 95% CI, -1.42- -0.80; p < 0.01), shorter length of hospital stay (adjusted estimate, -5.00; 95% CI, -7.99- -2.47; p < 0.01), lower medical costs (adjusted estimate, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49-0.69; p < 0.01), and lower 30- and 90-day readmission rates (30-day adjusted OR [aOR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.27-0.50; p < 0.01; 60-day aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33; p < 0.01) than did controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the multidomain intervention program during hospitalization improved the functional status and decreased the hospital stay length, medical costs, and readmission rates of frail older people.

Height loss as an indicator of ageing through its association with frailty and sarcopenia: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Height loss is associated with various health-related variables such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive function, and mortality. We hypothesized that height loss can be used as an indicator of aging, and we assessed whether the degree of height loss for 2 years was associated with frailty and sarcopenia.

METHODS

This study was based on a longitudinal cohort, the Pyeongchang Rural Area cohort. The cohort included people aged 65 years or older, ambulatory, and living at home. We divided individuals according to the ratio of height change (height change for 2 years divided by height at 2 years from baseline): HL2 (<-2%), HL1 (-2%--1%), and REF (-1%≤). We compared the frailty index, diagnosis of sarcopenia after 2 years from baseline, and the incidence of a composite outcome (mortality and institutionalization).

RESULTS

In total, 59 (6.9%), 116 (13.5%), and 686 (79.7%) were included in the HL2, HL1, and REF groups, respectively. Compared with the REF group, groups HL2 and HL1 had a higher frailty index, and higher risks of sarcopenia and composite outcome. When groups HL2 and HL1 were merged, the merged group had higher frailty index (standardized B, 0.06; p = 0.049), a higher risk of sarcopenia (OR, 2.30; p = 0.006), and a higher risk of composite outcome (HR, 1.78; p = 0.017) after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with greater height loss were frailer, more likely to be diagnosed with sarcopenia and had worse outcomes regardless of age and sex.

Feasibility of implementing a telephone-based frailty assessment

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing literature on the importance of identifying and managing frailty, its assessment has been limited in clinical settings. With the goal of integrating frailty assessment into routine clinical practice, this quality improvement project aimed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of administering a telephone-based frailty assessment.

METHODS

Between 9/2020 and 6/2021, we identified 169 established patients with serious illnesses in an academic primary care-geriatric clinic. Patients were contacted via telephone, and their current medical, functional, nutritional, cognitive, and mood statuses were assessed using validated screening tools. A deficit-accumulation frailty score was then calculated using an electronic medical record-based frailty index calculator and standardized documentation with recommendations was generated for providers. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as the proportion of patients successfully assessed. Secondary outcomes included completion rates of each domain, administration time, providers' perception, and clinical utility of the assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 139 (82.2%) patients, mean age of 82 years, 63.3% frail were successfully assessed. Of the 139 assessments, medical and functional domains were completed for all, while nutrition, mood, and cognition were completed by 88.5% (n = 123), 68.3% (n = 95), and 59.7% (n = 83) of the time, respectively. Conducting the full assessment took an average (standard deviation) time of 26.1 (7.3) minutes. Without the cognitive and mood domain, assessment took an average of 15.7 (7.5) minutes. Patients' providers found the information from the assessment helpful in evaluating and managing their patients. Care plans of 51.8% and 65.0% of patients who had mobility and mind issues, respectively, addressed these domains within 30 days after the assessment.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the telephone-based frailty assessment is feasible, acceptable, and has the potential to influence the care plans of older adults. This work demonstrated how frailty assessment can be integrated with the outpatient setting.

The impact of an exercise intervention using low-cost equipment on functional fitness in the community-dwelling older adults: A pilot study

Exercise interventions have shown significant improvements in the older adult population regarding functional and cognitive capacity. However, much research has applied exercise protocols that are expensive both for research and participation. Thus, high investments that are made are currently not ecologically efficient. The aim of the study was to determine whether the impact of a 20-week multicomponent exercise intervention using low-cost material could improve physical fitness in community-dwelling older adults. We tested the feasibility of this three times per week exercise protocol using an inclusive approach. Eligibility criteria included age ≥65 years, the ability to stand and walk with or without assistive devices, being physically inactive; medical clearance, and living in the community. Outcomes were muscle resistance measured using the chair-stand test for lower limbs, cardiorespiratory capacity measured using the 6-min walk test, and agility and balance using the Timed-up and Go test. Flexibility was measured using the chair sit and reach for lower limbs and the back scratch for upper limbs using the dominant leg and arm, respectively. Hand grip strength was measured using a dynamometer. Thirty participants (n = 30) were recruited and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of participants was 70 years (±3.62 years), 100% were Caucasians, and 50% were female. There was a significant trend toward a clinically important improvement in the chair-stand (t = -5.23; p < 0.001; d = 0.36), arm curl (t = -5.21; p < 0.001; d = 0.74), 6-min walk test (t = -4.69; p = <0.001; d = 0.77), timed-up and go test (t = 8.788; p < 0.001; d = 1.18), and hand grip strength (t = 2.846; p = 0.009; d = 0.23). There were also differences in the back scratch (t = 2.243; p = 0.035; d = 0.29) and chair sit and reach test (t = -3.380; p < 0.001; d = 0.15). This pilot study has provided preliminary evidence that a 20-week community-based low-cost exercise program may be effective in improving overall functional fitness in older people. The pilot trial has provided the necessary data to design future randomized-controlled trials that can be implemented in the community in an ecological feasible manner.

At-Point Clinical Frailty Scale as a Universal Risk Tool for Older Inpatients in Acute Hospital: A Cohort Study

Background

While the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) has been extensively validated for predicting health outcomes in older adults, the role of the at-point CFS at the time of examination is unclear. We aimed to examine the ability of the at-point CFS for predicting clinical outcomes of older inpatients.

Methods

As a single-center and prospective cohort study, we enrolled 1,016 older adults who were 65 years or older and were admitted to one of 9 medical or surgical units from May 2021 to September 2021. The associations of the at-point CFS with outcomes of falls, delirium, pressure ulcers, 30-day unplanned readmission and/or emergency department (ED) visits, institutionalization, and a composite outcome were analyzed.

Results

In the study population (n = 1,016), 26 patients had incident pressure ulcers, 6 patients had falls, 50 patients experienced delirium, and 13 patients died during hospitalization. Also, 37 patients experienced an ED visit and 22 patients had an unplanned readmission within 30 days after discharge. The composite outcome was 1.7% among patients with the CFS < 5 and 28.5% among patients with the CFS ≥ 5. The higher CFS was associated with an increased risk of a fall [odds ratio (OR) 1.74 (1.01-3.01)], pressure ulcers [OR 3.02 (2.15-4.23)], delirium [OR 2.72 (2.13-3.46)], 30-day readmission [OR 1.94 (1.44-2.62)], ED visit [OR 1.81 (1.47-2.23)], death [OR 3.27 (2.02-5.29)], and institutionalization after discharge [OR 1.88 (1.62-2.18)].

Conclusion

The at-point CFS assessed in older inpatients can screen high-risk individuals who might experience adverse geriatric conditions and in-hospital outcomes.

Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People

Background

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple measure of global fitness validated in various populations in real-world settings. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics and validities of the CFS in community-dwelling older people in Korea, with the original classification tree (oCFS) and a culturally modified tree (mCFS).

Methods

The comprehensive geriatric assessment records of 1,064 individuals of the Aging Study of the Pyeongchang Rural Area were used for this study. For mCFS, we considered the dependency of the food preparations and household chores not to be deficits in the male population. The frailty index was used as a reference for construct validity. We used a composite outcome of death and institutionalization for outcome validity.

Results

The correlation coefficients with frailty index were higher in mCFS (.535) than in oCFS (.468). The mean frailty index was lower in individuals reclassified by mCFS (5 to 4) than people who stayed in mCFS 5. The classification coefficient of mCFS was significantly higher than that of oCFS (p <0.001) in determining people with frailty (frailty index.25 or higher). Trends of a higher incidence of the composite outcome were observed in both higher oCFS and mCFS, in which oCFS and mCFS did not differ significantly in predicting the risk of the outcome.

Conclusion

The classification tree of CFS could be culturally adopted in a community-dwelling population of Korea and considered valid in detecting the vulnerable population.

Association Between Changes in Frailty Index and Clinical Outcomes: An Observational Cohort Study

Purpose

Although the association between a single assessment of frailty index (FI) and clinical outcomes has been revealed in prior studies, there is a lack of knowledge about the prognostic value of FI at different time points and the changes in repeated measurements of FI. Hence, we sought to determine the clinically meaningful changes in FI and reveal the association with the changes and a composite outcome of mortality and institutionalization.

Participants and Methods

This study was based on a longitudinal study of the Pyeongchang Rural Area cohort that included people aged 65 years or older, ambulatory and living at home. Individuals were divided into the worsened group (changes in FI ≥ 0.03 during 2 years) and the stable group (changes in FI < 0.03 during 2 years). The incidence of a composite outcome was compared between the two groups and the relationship was adjusted for age, sex, baseline FI, and follow-up FI.

Results

Of the 953 participants, 403 (42.3%) and 550 (57.7%) were included in the worsened group and the stable group, respectively. The worsened group had a significantly higher risk of the composite outcome than the stable group (HR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.54-3.67]; p < 0.001). Although the higher risk remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and baseline FI, the statistical significance disappeared after adjusting for follow-up FI (p = 0.614). The aggravation of FI in the worsened group was predominantly due to aggravation of FI domains, such as activities in daily living, cognitive function and mood, and mobility rather than comorbidity burden.

Conclusion

Aggravation of FI was associated with a composite outcome regardless of baseline FI, and the association was significantly reflected in the follow-up measurement of FI. The worsening FI was mainly attributable to functional geriatric domains.

Towards Healthy Ageing: Using the Concept of Intrinsic Capacity in Frailty Prevention

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether intrinsic capacity (IC) could predict frailty, whether declines in specific domains of IC could lead to frailty, and whether different combinations of domains could represent different risks of developing frailty.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Chinese people aged 65 years and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Using data from a prospective cohort study, we derived a summary score for IC and scores for the five domains (cognitive, locomotor, vitality, sensory, psychological) for each participant at baseline. Frailty was assessed according to the Fried's frailty phenotype at baseline, 2- and 4-year follow-ups. Participants were classified as frail if they had ≥3 of the following criteria: weight loss, self-rated exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity.

RESULTS

Four thousand participants were interviewed at baseline. Overall mean age was 72.5 years; 50% were women. Between baseline and the 2-year follow-up, 5.7% of non-frail participants developed frailty; between 2- and 4-year follow-ups, 5.7% of non-frail participants developed frailty. The average annual incidence rate of frailty was 2.9%. Higher scores on IC at baseline were associated with a lower risk of incident frailty at both follow-ups (year 2, odds ratio (OR)=0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.59-0.71); year 4, OR=0.64, 95%CI=0.58-0.71) after adjustment for age, sex, educational level, and chronic diseases. Across the five domains, vitality was the strongest predictor of incident frailty at each follow-up (year 2, OR=0.33, 95%CI=0.24-0.45; year 4, OR=0.33, 95%CI=0.23-0.46). Compared to other combinations of any two domains, having 'high' scores on both vitality and locomotor domains was associated with the lowest risk of incident frailty (year 2, OR=0.11, 95%CI=0.06-0.22, area under the curve (AUC)=0.770; year 4, OR=0.18, 95%CI=0.10-0.32, AUC=0.782).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that IC was independently associated with incident frailty. It also finds that vitality was the domain most strongly associated with incident frailty. Finally, it suggests that optimizing multiple domains of IC, particularly vitality and locomotor, may prevent frailty.

The Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area (ASPRA): Findings and Perspectives for Human Aging, Frailty, and Disability

The Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area (ASPRA) is a population-based, prospective cohort study of older adults in Pyeongchang, South Korea. Since the initial enrollment of 382 participants, the ASPRA has been maintained and has conducted comprehensive geriatric assessments annually, gradually expanding its population and coverage area. As a cohort study of aging-related conditions and their functional consequences, the ASPRA leveraged Pyeongchang's relatively low annual population movement rate and its healthcare delivery system, which was largely maintained by community health posts. Since its establishment, the ASPRA has reported numerous observational and multicomponent intervention studies on functional decline, geriatric syndrome, and frailty. Here, we discuss the findings and perspectives of ASPRA studies. We hope that the ASPRA enables the further implementation of a longitudinal study design on geriatric parameters and the development of public health strategies targeting aging-related conditions, especially in resource-limited community settings.