Increased risk of hip fracture among older people using antidepressant drugs: data from the Norwegian Prescription Database and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Registry

The missing link? Pharmacists' perspectives on discontinuation of long-term antidepressants: a qualitative study

Background

Long-term use of antidepressant drugs is widespread despite guidelines recommending limited duration. General practitioners (GPs) play a central role in reviewing and discontinuing antidepressants, although they hesitate to initiate a discussion about the long-term use. The potential role of pharmacists in this process is underexplored, despite their pharmaceutical expertise and accessibility.

Objectives

To explore community pharmacists' perspectives on the discontinuation of long-term use of antidepressants, and the barriers and facilitators to their involvement in this process.

Design

Qualitative study.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 Belgian community pharmacists until data saturation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

Results

Four themes emerged. (1) "Antidepressants at the pharmacy: a persistent taboo" showed pharmacists' hesitancy to initiate discontinuation discussions due to societal stigma and fear of being perceived as nosy. (2) "Balancing risks vs benefits" highlights that pharmacists were primarily concerned about relapse in stable patients but recognized that a patient request from a patient experiencing side effects may facilitate discontinuation. (3) "Is this my role?," pharmacists viewed GPs as the primary decision-makers in discontinuation, limiting their role to supporting GP treatment decisions. Key facilitators for discontinuation included a GP's decision to stop and a motivated patient. Regular reviews by the pharmacist could also facilitate the discontinuation process. (4) Optimizing pharmacists' role' with a strong need for GP collaboration, and acknowledging a need to optimize knowledge and skills to support antidepressant discontinuation.

Conclusion

Our study reveals that pharmacists viewed GPs as pivotal in the discontinuation process, as they make the decisions, while they see their role as supportive, following the doctor's decision. However, they faced significant barriers to discontinuing long-term antidepressants, including fear of relapse, societal taboo, and unclear responsibilities. More education, confidence building, and better collaboration with GPs could empower pharmacists to play a proactive role, improving the antidepressant discontinuation process.

Antidepressant use and cognitive decline in patients with dementia: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

Dementia is associated with psychiatric symptoms but the effects of antidepressants on cognitive function in dementia are understudied. We aimed to investigate the association between antidepressants and cognitive decline in patients with dementia, and the risk of severe dementia, fractures and death, depending on antidepressant class, drug, and dose.

METHODS

This is a national cohort study. Patients with dementia registered in the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders-SveDem from May 1, 2007, until October 16, 2018, with at least one follow-up after dementia diagnosis, and who were new users of antidepressants, were included. Antidepressant use as a time varying exposure defined during the 6 months leading up to dementia diagnosis or each subsequent follow-up. We used linear mixed models to examine the association between antidepressant use and cognitive trajectories assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate the hazard ratios for severe dementia (MMSE score < 10), fracture, and death. We compared antidepressant classes and drugs, and analyzed dose-response.

RESULTS

We included 18740 patients (10 205 women [54.5%]; mean [SD] age, 78.2[7.4] years), of which 4271 (22.8%) received at least one prescription for an antidepressant. During follow-up, a total of 11912 prescriptions for antidepressants were issued, with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) being the most common (64.8%). Antidepressant use was associated with faster cognitive decline (β (95% CI) = - 0.30(- 0.39, - 0.21) points/year), in particular sertraline (- 0.25(- 0.43, - 0.06) points/year), citalopram (- 0.41(- 0.55, - 0.27) points/year), escitalopram (- 0.76(- 1.09, - 0.44) points/year), and mirtazapine (- 0.19(- 0.34, - 0.04) points/year) compared with non-use. The association was stronger in patients with severe dementia (initial MMSE scores 0-9). Escitalopram showed a greater decline rate than sertraline. Compared with non-use, dose response of SSRIs on greater cognitive decline and higher risks of severe dementia, all-cause mortality, and fracture were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study, current antidepressant use was associated with faster cognitive decline; furthermore, higher dispensed doses of SSRIs were associated with higher risk for severe dementia, fractures, and all-cause mortality. These findings highlight the significance of careful and regular monitoring to assess the risks and benefits of different antidepressants use in patients with dementia.

Risk of osteoporotic fractures in menopausal women with common mental health diagnoses prescribed SSRIs/SNRIs: cohort and self-controlled case series analyses

In a population-based cohort study of menopausal women with common mental health diagnoses, SSRIs/SNRIs were associated with a 32% increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. The risk of osteoporotic fractures was particularly increased for longer periods of treatment with SSRIs/SNRIs (> 5 years) and in younger menopausal women (< 50 years old).

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and the risk of osteoporotic fractures (OF) in menopausal women with common mental health diagnoses (CMHD).

METHODS

We conducted the study with two designs (cohort and self-controlled case series [SCCS]), using the IQVIA Medical Research Database (IMRD) UK. The source population comprised women aged ≥ 50 years and women with a record indicating menopause (< 50 years). All women had a recorded CMHD. For the cohort analysis, the risk of OFs was estimated by comparing women prescribed SSRIs/SNRIs (exposed) to those not exposed. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For the SCCS, women acted as their own controls; periods of exposure to SSRIs/SNRIs were compared to periods of non-exposure using conditional Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

We identified 292,848 women, of whom 35,222 experienced OFs within a median follow-up of 6.01 years. We found strong evidence of an association between SSRIs/SNRIs and the risk of OFs (adjusted HR = 1.32, 95% CI:1.29-1.35). Compared to periods of no exposure, SSRIs/SNRIs increased the risk of OFs during the first 30 days (IRR = 1.38, 95% CI:1.26-1.51), during the first 90 days (IRR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.48-1.69), and the remaining exposure (IRR = 1.42, 95% CI:1.37-1.48).

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of menopausal women with CMHDs, the prescribing of SSRIs/SNRIs antidepressants was associated with a higher risk of OFs. Careful assessment of osteoporosis risk needs to be considered when treating menopausal women with SSRIs/SNRIs antidepressants.

Association between tricyclic antidepressants and health outcomes among older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tricyclic antidepressants are effective for managing depression and other disorders. However, they can cause adverse reactions due to their anticholinergic properties, with the risk of such events increasing with age. This study identifies and describes clinical studies that evaluate associations between the use of tricyclic antidepressants and adverse health outcomes (falls, fractures, and mortality) among older people. A systematic search of the literature in English, Spanish, and French was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane. The systematic review included a total of 18 studies. The meta-analysis examined the 14 studies that investigated the association between the use of tricyclic antidepressants and the risk of falls and fractures (4 of the 18 studies focused on mortality and so were excluded from the meta-analysis). The odds ratio (OR) was 1.40 (95 % CI = 1.27-1.53, p < 0.001). The Cochran Q test was significant (X2 = 79.72, p < 0.001), indicating high heterogeneity (I2 = 84.9 %). An additional meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), yielding an HR of 1.21 (95 % CI = 0.93-1.58, p = 0.16). Meta-regression analysis indicated that the years of follow-up could have a significant effect on the association studied (p = 0.008). In conclusion, enhancing our understanding of the use of antidepressants and the associated risk of adverse events in older adults will enable the identification of the most appropriate type of antidepressant for each clinical situation.

Antidepressant medications in women aged 40 and older and the risk of fragility fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressants and menopause are risk factors which are independently associated with an increased risk of fractures. This review aims to investigate the risk of fragility fractures in women aged 40 and older and prescribed antidepressants.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 1 June 2024. Relevant citations were identified and screened against our inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study population comprised women over 40 years. The risk of fragility fractures was compared between users and non-users of antidepressants. Risk of bias assessment was carried out using the ROBINS-I tool. A meta-analysis of cohort studies was performed to assess fracture risk associated with prescribing of any antidepressant agents, and SSRIs specifically.

RESULTS

Of the 3,676 articles retrieved, five observational studies were found eligible for inclusion (n = 1,240,354). In a meta-analysis of 4 studies, an increased risk of fractures in women was associated with the prescribing of antidepressants (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.28; I2 = 96.50%) and SSRIs in particular (HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.20-1.55; I2 = 40.32%).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this review suggest that prescribing of antidepressants is associated with an increased risk of fractures in women aged 40 and older. Substantial heterogeneity between studies may have affected the results of the meta-analysis.

Comparative analysis of psychiatric medications and their association with falls and fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

An association between psychiatric medications and falls and fractures in people taking them has been demonstrated, but which class or medication leads to the greatest risk of falls or fractures should be further investigated. The aim of this study was to compare and rank the magnitude of risk of falls and fractures due to different psychiatric medications. Eight databases were searched for this meta-analysis and evaluated using a frequency-based network meta-analysis. The results included a total of 28 papers with 14 medications from 5 major classes, involving 3,467,314 patients. The results showed that atypical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of falls, and typical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of resulting in fractures. Quetiapine ranked first in the category of 13 medications associated with risk of falls, and class Z drugs ranked first in the category of 6 medications associated with risk of fractures. The available evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics and typical antipsychotics may be the drugs with the highest risk of falls and fractures, respectively. Quetiapine may be the medication with the highest risk of falls, and class Z drugs may be the medication with the highest risk of fractures.

Risk factors for osteoporotic hip fracture among community-dwelling older adults: a real-world evidence study

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures in the older adults lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Although a low bone mineral density is considered the leading risk factor, it is essential to recognize other factors that could affect the risk of hip fractures. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and muscle and aerobic capacity for hip fractures in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study with real world-data from subjects ≥ 60 years old attending an outpatient clinic in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from May 1, 2019, to August 22, 2022. Data about clinical characteristics (multimorbidity, medications of long-term use, sedative and or tricyclic medications, number of falls), patient-reported outcomes (self-perception of health, self-report of difficulty walking, self-report of vision problems, and self-report of falls) and muscle and aerobic capacity (calf circumference, body mass index, and gait speed) were retrieved from an electronic health record. The association of each potential risk factor and hip fracture was investigated by a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 7,836 older adults were included with a median age of 80 years (IQR 72-86) and 5,702 (72.7%) were female. Hip fractures occurred in 121 (1.54%) patients. Multimorbidity was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture (OR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.06-1.18) and each episode of fall increased the chance of hip fracture by 1.7-fold (OR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.52-1.80). Patient-reported outcomes associated with increased fracture risk were regular or poor self-perception of health (OR = 1.59, 95%CI 1.06-2.37), self-report of walking difficulty (OR = 3.06, 95%CI 1.93-4.84), and self-report of falls (OR = 2.23, 95%CI 1.47-3.40). Body mass index and calf circumference were inversely associated with hip fractures (OR = 0.91, 95%CI 0.87-0.96 and OR = 0.93, 95%CI 0.88-0.97, respectively), while slow gait speed increased the chance of hip fractures by almost two-fold (OR = 1.80, 95%CI 1.22-2.66).

CONCLUSION

Our study reinforces the importance of identified risk factors for hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults beyond bone mineral density and available fracture risk assessment tools. Data obtained in primary care can help physicians, other health professionals, and public health policies to identify patients at increased risk of hip fractures.

Antidepressant duloxetine hydrochloride protects against ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported the association between osteoporosis and major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as the use of antidepressants. However, it remains to be elucidated whether these associations are related to exposure to antidepressants, a consequence of a disease process, or a combination of both.

METHODS

This study investigates the independent effect of the antidepressant duloxetine hydrochloride (DH) on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice. One week after ovariectomy, the treated mice received DH. To explore the mechanism underlying the rescue of bone loss, bone marrow cells were isolated from mouse femurs and tibias, and macrophages extracted from them were induced to become osteoclasts in vitro while being treated with DH. Subsequently, the osteoclasts underwent Bulk RNA-Seq to reveal the involved signaling pathways. The results of the bioinformatic analysis were then validated through in vitro experiments.

RESULTS

The in vivo experiments demonstrated that DH treatment compromised ovariectomy-induced bone loss after 7 weeks. The in vitro experiments suggested that DH treatment attenuated osteoclast differentiation via the MAPKs/NFATc1 signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study suggest that DH, instead of causing bone mass loss, may assist in alleviating postmenopausal osteoporosis. These results can serve as a reference for the clinical treatment of patients with perimenopausal or postmenopausal depression using antidepressants.

The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine promotes late-stage fracture healing in mice

Impaired fracture healing is of high clinical relevance, as up to 15% of patients with long-bone fractures display non-unions. Fracture patients also include individuals treated with selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). As SNRI were previously shown to negatively affect bone homeostasis, it remained unclear whether patients with SNRI are at risk of impaired bone healing. Here, we show that daily treatment with the SNRI reboxetine reduces trabecular bone mass in the spine but increases cortical thickness and osteoblast numbers in the femoral midshaft. Most importantly, reboxetine does not impair bone regeneration in a standardized murine fracture model, and even improves callus bridging and biomechanical stability at late healing stages. In sum, reboxetine affects bone remodeling in a site-specific manner. Treatment does not interfere with the early and intermediate stages of bone regeneration and improves healing outcomes of the late-stage fracture callus in mice.

Antidepressant drug-drug-drug interactions associated with unintentional traumatic injury: Screening for signals in real-world data

Antidepressants are associated with traumatic injury and are widely used with other medications. It remains unknown how drug-drug-drug interactions (3DIs) between antidepressants and two other drugs may impact potential injury risks associated with antidepressants. We aimed to generate hypotheses regarding antidepressant 3DI signals associated with elevated injury rates. Using 2000-2020 Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart, we performed a self-controlled case series study for each drug triad consisting of an antidepressant + codispensed drug (base-pair) with a candidate interacting medication (precipitant). We included persons aged greater than or equal to 16 years who (1) experienced an injury and (2) used a candidate precipitant, during base-pair therapy. We compared injury rates during observation time exposed to the drug triad versus the base-pair only, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We calculated adjusted rate ratios (RRs) using conditional Poisson regression and accounted for multiple comparisons via semi-Bayes shrinkage. Among 147,747 eligible antidepressant users with an injury, we studied 120,714 antidepressant triads, of which 334 (0.3%) were positively associated with elevated injury rates and thus considered potential 3DI signals. Adjusted RRs for signals ranged from 1.31 (1.04-1.65) for sertraline + levothyroxine with tramadol (vs. without tramadol) to 6.60 (3.23-13.46) for escitalopram + simvastatin with aripiprazole (vs. without aripiprazole). Nearly half of the signals (137, 41.0%) had adjusted RRs greater than or equal to 2, suggesting strong associations with injury. The identified signals may represent antidepressant 3DIs of potential clinical concern and warrant future etiologic studies to test these hypotheses.

Characteristics of fallers who later sustain a hip fracture: a NOREPOS study

Fall prevention programs have shown inconclusive results concerning hip fracture reduction. We found that fallers with poor health, low societal participation, and use of psychotropics/painkillers had a threefold to fivefold increased hip fracture risk compared to non-fallers without these risk factors. This may help target fall prevention towards high-risk individuals.

INTRODUCTION

To investigate whether self-reported information on health, societal participation, and drug use in older people, easily obtainable by health care providers, contribute to predict future hip fracture beyond self-reported falls.

METHODS

We used data from 3801 women and 6439 men aged 70-79 years participating in population-based studies in five counties in Norway 2000-2003. Height and weight were measured. Socioeconomic status, lifestyle, health status, and history of falling were self-reported through questionnaires. Falls last year were dichotomized into one or more versus no falls. Hip fractures were identified by linkage to hospital data with follow-up through 2013. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for hip fracture by combinations of risk factors with history of falling were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

More women (32.4%) than men (27.7%) reported one or more falls during the previous year, and 17.9% of women (n = 682) and 8.9% of men (n = 572) suffered a hip fracture during median 11.6 years of follow-up. Poor health, low societal participation, and use of psychotropics/analgesics among fallers were strong predictors of hip fracture. The presence of all three risk factors and history of falling was associated with HR 2.92 (95% CI 2.10-4.05) for hip fracture in women and HR 4.60 (95% CI 2.71-7.81) in men compared to non-fallers without these factors.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that self-assessment of health, information about activities outside home, and drug use among fallers far better identify high risk of hip fracture in older people than information about falls alone.

The association of change in peak oxygen uptake with use of psychotropics in community-dwelling older adults - The Generation 100 study

BACKGROUND

The use of psychotropics is high among the older population and may have detrimental effects on their physical and mental health. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong and modifiable measure of health and declines with age. We aimed to study the association of change in CRF with use of psychotropics in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

We analyzed longitudinal data from 1531 older adults from the Generation 100 study, aged 70-77 years at inclusion, and with a permanent address in Trondheim, Norway. Data on objectively measured peak oxygen uptake (VO_2peak) were linked with register data from the Norwegian Prescription Database on prescribed psychotropics. The included psychotropics were antidepressants (N06A), antipsychotics (N05A), anxiolytics (N05B), hypnotics and sedatives (N05C), and N03AE (benzodiazepine derivatives). Analyses were done on any psychotropics as one group, and on the following separate groups: antidepressants (N06A), benzodiazepines (N05BA, N05CD, and N03AE), and z-hypnotics (N05CF). Peak oxygen uptake was measured four times over a five-year period and corresponding medication use was measured as defined daily doses (DDD). A random effects estimator was applied to investigate the association of change in VO_2peak with the use of psychotropics.

RESULTS

We found a statistically significant curvilinear association of change in VO_2peak with use of any psychotropics and antidepressants. For VO_2peak up to ~ 40 ml/kg/min, each 1 ml/kg/min increase was associated by a 3.3 DDD and 2.5 DDD decrease in use of any psychotropics and antidepressants, respectively. A bottoming-out effect was found and increases in VO_2peak above ~ 40 ml/kg/min showed increased use of any psychotropics and antidepressants. However, the association of change in VO_2peak with use was stronger for changes in the lower continuum of VO_2peak levels and decreased with increasing VO_2peak. No statistically significant association of change in VO_2peak with use of benzodiazepines and z-hypnotics were found. However, because of a non-randomized design, we cannot rule out the possibility of confounding by indication.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show a curvilinear association of change in VO_2peak with use of any psychotropics and antidepressants in older adults. This relationship adds a new viewpoint on the adverse effects of psychotropic use and should be considered in interventions and policies aimed at reducing psychotropic medication use among the older population.

Antidepressants and Vertebral and Hip Risk Fracture: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although antidepressant drugs appear to play an active role in increasing fracture risk, their weight is still unclear. We conducted a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis through PubMed/Scopus/Cochrane libraries and registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021254006) to investigate the relationship between antidepressant drugs categories, including SSRIs, SNRIs, and TCAs, and the risk of hip and vertebral fractures. After screening 3122 items, we finally found 26 papers for qualitative analysis and 11 for quantitative synthesis. A total of 15,209,542 adult and elderly patients were identified, with a mean follow-up of 51 months and a major prevalence of women. We identified results largely for SSRIs, with only a small amount of data for SNRIs, TCAs, and NaSSA. No data were found among the most recent categories of antidepressants, such as vortioxetine and esketamine. All included studies reported hip fractures, while three of them also included vertebral fractures. Overall, we observed a significant effect of SSRIs on fracture risk with a mean effect of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.75–1.20). This meta-analysis reveals that the use of SSRIs increases the risk of fractures. Clinicians’ awareness in antidepressant prescription should optimize their potential while reducing this risk.

Prospective association between depressive symptoms and hip fracture and fall among middle-aged and older Chinese individuals

BACKGROUND

The effect of depressive symptoms on hip fracture (HF) and falls among the Chinese population is unclear. This study aims to examine the prospective association between depressive symptoms and HF as well as fall accidents in a nationally representative Chinese population.

METHODS

We used data from 10,596 participants in the Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (from 2011 to 2018) who were aged ≥45 years and had no HFs at baseline. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studied Depression scale (cutoff for distinguishing high versus low at ≥12). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors and physical comorbidities were performed.

RESULTS

For the analysis of baseline depressive symptoms and HF, 399 (3.8%) participants reported HF accidents in the following 7-year period. Individuals with elevated depressive symptoms at baseline experienced a markedly higher HF risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.67) than those without elevated depressive symptoms, after adjusting for a wide range of potential confounders. For the analysis of baseline depressive symptoms and falls, 3974 (37.5%) experienced fall accidents during the follow-up. The presence of elevated depressive symptoms was independently associated with an increased risk of fall events (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.10-1.33). These associations were consistent across multiple characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, elevated depressive symptoms were associated with an increased risk of HF and falls, which may have considerable clinical and preventive implications.

General practitioners' perspectives on discontinuation of long-term antidepressants in nursing homes

Background

Long-term use of antidepressant drugs (AD), much longer than recommended by guidelines, in nursing homes (NH) is common. NH home residents may have a relatively higher risk of adverse events. Moreover, in an NH setting nursing staff and relatives are intensively involved in the decision-making process. In many countries, General Practitioners’ (GPs) provide care for residents in NHs. Little is known about GPs’ perspectives on discontinuation of long-term AD in NH residents.

Objectives

To explore GPs’ views of discontinuing long-term AD in NH residents.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative study, with semi-structured interviews, was conducted with a purposive sample of 20 Belgian GPs. Interviews, conducted over six months in 2019, were analysed by thematic analysis.

Results

Twenty interviews were conducted until data saturation. The first theme, ‘reluctance to rock the boat: not worth taking the risk’, describes that GPs perceive discontinuation as an unpredictable risk without clear benefits. GPs’ main concern was the risk of destabilising the fragile balance in an older patient. Second, ‘it takes at least three to tango’, captures the unspoken alliance between GPs, nursing staff and relatives and suggests that agreement of at least these three partners is required. The third, ‘Opening the door: triggers to discontinue’, points to severe health problems and dementia as strong facilitators for discontinuation.

Conclusion

Discontinuation of long-term AD in NHs is a complex process for GPs. More evidence and attention to the role nursing staff and relatives play are needed to better guide the discontinuation of AD in older NH patients.

Role of medicines management in preventing falls in older people

Falls are common in older people and are a cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. As well as causing injury, falls can result in pain, distress, loss of confidence, loss of independence and increased mortality. Older people are more likely to visit an emergency department following a fall, therefore these incidents place a high burden on these patients and their carers, as well as on healthcare systems. Appropriate risk assessment accompanied by multifactorial falls prevention interventions can reduce the risk of falls. Assessments should include a medication review because various medicines, sometimes referred to as 'falls risk increasing drugs', can precipitate or contribute to falls. This article examines some of the medicines in this group that can contribute to falls, serious injuries and fractures in older people. It also discusses the importance of medicines management as part of falls risk assessment and prevention interventions.

Systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy is not associated with school performance in offspring - A Danish population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in pregnancy is considered a risk factor for a range of adverse outcomes in the offspring. Studies have indicated increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders, dyslexia and ADHD. However, the overall long-term cognitive development of children born to women with SLE has scarcely been examined. In this study, we compare test scores from the Danish National School Tests of children born to women SLE with children of the background population.

METHODS

We included all singleton children born in Denmark between 1995 and 2008, who were listed in the Danish National School Test Register (n=738,862). Children born to women with SLE were identified through linkage of national healthcare registers. We assessed the children's performance in the national school tests between 2nd and 8th grade, in reading and mathematics. Information on the mothers' redeemed prescriptions in pregnancy was included in stratified analyses. Differences of mean test scores were derived from linear regressions and compared according to maternal SLE status, and predefined categories of medication exposures.

RESULTS

In total, 312 (0.04%) children were born to mothers with SLE. There were no differences in performance in neither reading nor mathematics tests between those born to mothers with SLE and children born to mothers without SLE. When stratifying on medication exposures among children whose mothers had SLE, there was a non-significant tendency towards poorer results among those exposed to hydroxychloroquine and/or immunosuppressants (n=31), compared to those not exposed to these medications. A similar tendency was not observed among children whose mothers received hydroxychloroquine for non-SLE reasons (n=1,235).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates no major harmful effect on the child's neurocognitive development from exposure in utero to SLE, hydroxychloroquine and/or immunosuppressants, as measured by school performance.

Bones of Contention: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Non-SSRI Antidepressant Use and Bone Health

Osteoporotic fractures are associated with major morbidity and mortality, particularly among older age groups. In recent decades, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) antidepressants have been linked to reduced bone mineral density and increased risk of fragility fracture. However, up to one-third of antidepressant prescriptions are for classes other than SSRIs. Older patients, who are particularly vulnerable to osteoporosis and its clinical and psychosocial consequences, may be prescribed non-SSRI antidepressants preferentially because of increasing awareness of the risks SSRIs pose to bone health. However, to date, the skeletal effects of non-SSRI antidepressants have not been comprehensively reviewed. In this article, we collate and review the available data and discuss the findings. Based on the current literature, we tentatively suggest that tricyclic antidepressants may increase the risk of fracture via mechanisms other than a direct effect on bone mineral density. The risk is apparently confined to current users only and is greatest in the earliest stage of treatment, diminishing thereafter. There is, as yet, insufficient data to conclusively determine the effects of other antidepressant classes on bone. Judicious prescribing of antidepressants among higher risk groups necessitates a thorough review of the individual's risk factors for osteoporosis as well as attention to their falls risk. Further longitudinal, rigorously controlled studies are needed to answer some of the remaining questions on the effects of non-SSRI antidepressants on bone and the mechanisms by which they are exerted.

Health Outcomes Associated with Adherence to Antidepressant Use during Acute and Continuation Phases of Depression Treatment among Older Adults with Dementia and Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVES

To examine health outcomes associated with adherence to Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) antidepressant medication management (AMM) during acute and continuation phases of depression treatment among older adults with dementia and major depressive disorder (MDD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medicare 5% sample data (2011-2013).

PARTICIPANTS

Older adults (aged 65 years or older) with dementia and MDD.

MEASUREMENTS

The first antidepressant prescription claim from 1 May 2011 through 30 April 2012 was considered the index prescription start date (IPSD). Adherence during acute- and continuation-phase AMM was based on HEDIS guidelines. Study outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and falls/factures (with mortality being the competing event for hospitalization and falls/fractures) during follow-up from end of acute-/continuation-phase AMM adherence. Due to the proportionality assumption violation of Cox models, fully non-parametric approaches (Kaplan-Meier and modified Gray's test) were used for time-to-event analysis adjusting for the inverse probability of treatment weights.

RESULTS

Final study samples consisted of 4330 (adherent (N) = 3114 (71.92%)) and 3941 (adherent (N) = 2407 (61.08%)) older adults with dementia and MDD during acute- and continuation-phase treatments, respectively. No significant difference (p > 0.05) between adherent and non-adherent groups was observed for all-cause mortality and falls/fractures in both the acute and continuation phases. There was a significant difference in time to all-cause hospitalization during acute-phase treatment (p = 0.018), with median times of 530 (95% CI: 499-587) and 425 (95% CI: 364-492) days for adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute-phase adherence to HEDIS AMM was associated with reductions in all-cause hospitalization risk among older adults with dementia and MDD.

Alliance between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and fracture risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In the past few years, several fracture-related events have been reported with chronic use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) throughout the globe. Hence, an updated systematic review and meta-analysis was necessary to ascertain the risk involved. The present work evaluated the association of SSRIs with the risk of fracture in adults.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar for observational studies on the same from inception to April 2019. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by 2 authors.

RESULTS

We assessed 69 studies out of which 37 (14 case-control, 23 cohorts) were included. Our results showed that SSRIs were significantly associated with an increased fracture risk (relative risk of 1.62, 95% CI 1.52-1.73; P < 0.000; I2 = 90.8%). The relative risk values for case-control and cohort studies were found to be 1.80 (95% CI 1.58-2.03; P < 0.000; I2 = 93.2%) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.64; P < 0.000; I2 = 88.0%) respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that association of risk of fracture persisted regardless of geographical location, study design, risk factors, defined daily dose, SSRI use duration, site of the fracture, period of study and after adjusting for depression, physical activity, gender, and age group. The sensitivity analysis data shows that the studies adjusted for bone mineral density and osteoporosis show lesser fracture risk.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggests that SSRIs may be associated with an increased fracture risk; hence, bone health should be taken into consideration while prescribing this class of drugs.

Patterns of Psychoactive Medication Use in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the US in 2016: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Objectives: We aim to quantify any use and long-term use patterns of psychoactive medications and explore differences in use by sociodemographic factors in older adults (60-85 years) using the 2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Methods: Prevalence estimates of any use and long-term use were calculated. Chi-square and crude odds ratios were calculated to estimate differences in any use and long-term use of psychoactive medication by sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Results: Thirty percent of older adults in the US reported any use of psychoactive medications. Long-term use was significantly higher in women (28.3% [95% confidence interval: 26.5, 30.2]), white (27.8 [26.1, 29.7]), presently unmarried (27.5 [25.4, 29.7]), and low-income (30.3 [27.7, 32.9]) subgroups than in men (20.5 [18.4, 22.5]), Black (14.7 [12.3, 17.1]), presently married (22.8 [20.7, 24.9]), and high-income (21.1 [19.1, 23.1]) subgroups, respectively. Discussion: Despite continued risks associated with use, long-term use of psychoactive medications is prevalent in the older adult population in the US. Given the increased complexity of pharmacotherapy regimens in this population, enhanced efforts at improving use of psychoactive medications should be intensified.

Tricyclic Antidepressant Use and Risk of Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies through the Use of Both Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches

Background: Research findings regarding the association between tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) treatment and the risk of fracture are not consistent; we aimed to assess whether people who take TCAs are at an increased fracture risk. Methods: Relevant studies published through June 2020 were identified through database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Science, WorldCat Dissertations and Theses from each database’s inception, as well as through manual searches of relevant reference lists. Two researchers independently performed literature searches, study selection, data abstraction and study appraisal by using a standardized protocol. Frequentist and Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models were used for the analysis. The heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated in this study. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, TCA use was associated with a significantly increased risk of fracture in both the frequentist approach (Risk Ratio (RR), 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06–1.42; p = 0.007) and the Bayesian method (RR, 1.24, 95% Credible Interval (CrI), 1.01–1.56). These results were consistent in multiple sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the meta-analysis; however, no significant publication bias was detected. Conclusion: TCA medication may indicate an increased risk of fracture. TCA should be prescribed with caution in the clinic.

Use of benzodiazepines, z-hypnotics and antidepressants among hip fracture patients in Finland. Consistency between recorded and detected benzodiazepines

PURPOSE

We described the use of benzodiazepines (BZDs), z-hypnotics, and antidepressants; analyzed the consistency between recorded and detected BZDs among hip fracture patients admitted to two Finnish hospitals during one year; and compared the results with corresponding results from 12 years earlier.

METHODS

Current use of medication was obtained from the National Prescription Register. Urine and blood samples used to detect BZD were taken during admission. The following Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classes were included: BZDs: N05BA, N05CD; z-hypnotics: N05CF; and antidepressants: N06A.The presence of BZDs in urine was analyzed using immunoassay. Positive BZDs were confirmed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. BZDs in serum were analyzed using liquid chromatography. Concordance between recorded and detected BZDs was calculated with kappa (κ) and described using a Venn diagram.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients were enrolled in the study. BZD was detected in 18 %. Kappa was 0.39 (95 % CI 0.25-0.53). Overlap of detected and recorded BZDs was 59 %. According to the prescription register, 18 % used z-hypnotics, and according to both the detection of BZDs and register, 49 % used BZDs and/or z-hypnotics. 22 % used antidepressants and 15 % used combinations of the studied drugs concomitantly.

CONCLUSION

Use rate of BZDs and/or z-hypnotics was similar to that 12 years ago. No difference in the consistency between our previous and present study was found either. All studied drugs and their concomitant use increase the risk for fractures. In the elderly, point prevalence of medication and appropriateness should be regularly assessed.

Individual Antidepressants and the Risk of Fractures in Older Adults: A New User Active Comparator Study

Objective

To determine the risk of hip–pelvis and other non-vertebral fractures in older adults using antidepressants (ADs).

Methods

We conducted a case–control study nested in a cohort of new users of ADs aged ≥65 years without prior hip–pelvis or other non-vertebral fractures, identified in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD) during 2005–2014. Cases were patients first hospitalized for hip–pelvis or other non-vertebral fractures. Up to 100 controls per case were selected using incidence density sampling. AD use was ascertained at index date (ID) based on the supply of last dispensing. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression with current users of mirtazapine as reference (active comparator).

Results

A total of 39,853 cases of hip–pelvis fracture (80% women, median age 81 years) and 31,577 cases of other fractures (84% women, median age 79 years) were matched to >3 million controls. For hip–pelvis fracture, aORs in current users were about 1.3 with little variation between individual ADs, ranging from 1.33 for citalopram (95% CI 1.27–1.39) to 1.28 for amitriptyline (1.21–1.35). For other fractures, the aORs were highest in current users of citalopram (1.50; 1.42–1.58) and duloxetine (1.54; 1.39–1.71) and lowest for amitriptyline (1.18; 1.11–1.26) and trimipramine (1.16; 1.03–1.29). For all examined ADs, the aORs were higher for other fractures than for hip–pelvis fracture.

Conclusion

The risk of fractures varies between ADs, but for most agents is higher than the risk for mirtazapine. When treating older adults with ADs, prescribers should carefully consider the risk profile of individual ADs regarding fractures, which are a major health problem in this population.

Use of short-acting and long-acting hypnotics and the risk of fracture: a critical analysis of associations in a nationwide cohort

Numerous observational studies suggest that hypnotics increase the risk of fractures, and long-acting hypnotics are suggested to be especially harmful. This study showed that the highest risk of fracture was found before start of treatment and remained after end of therapy, suggesting that the increased risk during treatment is influenced by other factors, such as underlying disease.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between the use of short-acting and long-acting hypnotics and the risk of fracture.

METHODS

Four cohorts were formed from all individuals living in Sweden aged ≥ 50 years in 2005 (n = 3,341,706). In the first cohort, individuals prescribed long-acting propiomazine (n = 233,609) were matched 1:1 with controls. In the second cohort, individuals prescribed short-acting z-drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon, n = 591,136) were matched 1:1 with controls. The third and fourth cohorts consisted of full sibling pairs with discordant propiomazine (n = 83,594) and z-drug (n = 153,314) use, respectively.

RESULTS

The risk of fracture was greatest among users of hypnotics in the 90 days before the initiation of treatment, both for propiomazine (odds ratio [OR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.28-2.79) and z-drugs (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 3.86-4.35) compared with that in matched controls. Furthermore, this risk was significantly reduced after the initiation of treatment with propiomazine (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60) and z-drugs (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.56-1.80) and remained the first year following the last prescribed dose both for propiomazine (OR, 1.28, 95% CI, 1.21-1.36) and z-drugs (OR, 1.19, 95% CI, 1.16-1.23). The pattern was similar in the sibling cohorts, with the greatest risk of fracture seen in the 90 days before treatment with hypnotics was initiated.

CONCLUSION

The use of short-acting and long-acting hypnotics is associated with an increased risk of fracture. This risk was highest before initiation of treatment and remained after end of therapy. The results suggest that the increased risk during treatment is influenced by other factors such as underlying disease.

Falls in hospital: a case-control study

Aims

Falls among inpatients are common. The method used by The Norwegian Patient Safety Campaign to measure the adverse events is the Global Trigger Tool, which does not look at the causation for falls. This study was aimed at investigating major risk factors for falls in the hospital setting.

Methods

This retrospective case–control study was conducted at Telemark Hospital in Norway, in the period from September 2012 to August 2014. A total of 842 patients from three wards were included, whereof 172 cases had experienced one or more fall(s) during hospitalisation and 670 random controls had not fallen. Data were analysed according to a pragmatic strategy.

Results

Compared with patients who did not fall, patients who fell were 21 times more likely to have poor balance (OR = 21.50, 95% CI: 10.26–45.04) and 19 times more likely to have very poor balance (OR = 19.62, 95% CI: 9.55–40.27), twice as likely to be men (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.24–2.68), and 50% increased probability of fall with every 10 year increase of age (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.34–1.69). Furthermore, the patients who fell were more likely to use antidepressant drugs (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.09–13.63), antipsychotic drugs (OR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.94–5.51), anxiolytic/hypnotic drugs (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.22–2.67) and antiepileptic drugs (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.11–4.06) than patients who did not fall.

Conclusions

During hospital stay, patients who fell had a higher risk profile than patients who did not fall. Clinicians should work to improve patients’ safety and reduce the risk of falls by accurately assessing balance and mobility as a form of primary prevention. We recommend that a review of the patient medications should be conducted upon falling, as a form of a secondary preventive strategy against falls.

Impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the veteran population: 10-year risk outcomes

AIM

To evaluate the comparative risk of hip fracture or osteoporosis among US Veterans based on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure.

PATIENTS & METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of eligible US Veterans Health Administration patients enrolled in 2003-2004 was performed to examine SSRIs' 2-, 5- and 10-year impact on bone health using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Veterans on SSRIs were found to be 56.7% more likely over a 10-year period to suffer a hip fracture (risk ratio: 1.567; 95% CI: 1.464-1.676) and 34.6% more likely to develop osteoporosis (risk ratio: 1.346; 95% CI: 1.319-1.374) when compared with those who were SSRI naive.

CONCLUSION

SSRI usage was associated with greater risk of hip fracture and osteoporosis over a 10-year period in the veteran population, with similar effect sizes to smaller studies.

Antidepressants and the risk of traumatic brain injury in the elderly: differences between individual agents

Objective

To determine the association of individual antidepressants (ADs) with the risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the elderly.

Patients and methods

We conducted a case-control study nested in a cohort of new users of ADs aged ≥65 years, identified in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database during 2005-2014. Cases were patients first hospitalized for TBI. Up to 100 controls per case were selected using incidence density sampling. AD use was ascertained at the index date based on the supply of last dispensing (adding 150% of the defined daily doses [DDDs]; in sensitivity analysis, no additional DDDs were considered). We estimated adjusted ORs (aORs) and 95% CIs using conditional logistic regression.

Results

Among 701,309 cohort members, 16,750 cases were identified and matched to 1,673,320 controls (in both groups: 70.4% women; median age 80 years). Compared with remote users of the same AD, current users had an aOR (95% CI) of 1.87 (1.56-2.24) for duloxetine, 1.74 (1.41-2.15) for escitalopram, 1.70 (1.58-1.83) for citalopram, 1.66 (1.40-1.97) for sertraline, 1.64 (1.24-2.15) for fluoxetine and 1.57 (1.20-2.06) for paroxetine. The aOR was lower for amitriptyline (1.45; 1.32-1.58), trimipramine (1.17; 0.99-1.38) and opipramol (1.11; 0.99-1.25). Mirtazapine had an aOR of 1.03 (0.94-1.12). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the findings.

Conclusion

The large variability between individual ADs shows the importance of considering the safety of individual agents rather than focusing on class alone.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in hip fracture patients: a Danish nationwide prevalence study

Background and purpose - Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often used in the elderly and are associated with adverse effects. Therefore, it is important to ascertain the prevalence of SSRI use in fragile and surgery-treated hip fracture patients. Methods - This population-based prevalence study included Danish hip fracture patients aged ≥ 65 years operated in 2006-2016 (n = 68,607) and matched individuals from the background population (n = 343,020). Using Poisson regression, prevalence risk ratios (PRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to compare hip fracture patients with the general population, and to estimate the association between hip fracture patient characteristics and SSRI prescriptions. Results - The prevalence of SSRI use among hip fracture patients was 23% compared with 12% in the general population. During 2006-2016, the prevalence decreased from 26% to 18% among hip fracture patients and from 13% to 10% in the general population. Factors associated with SSRI use in hip fracture patients were age 75-84 years (PRR 1.18, CI 1.13-1.23), age ≥ 85 years (PRR 1.17, CI 1.11-1.22), female sex (PRR 1.13, CI 1.09-1.17), unmarried status (PRR 1.15, CI 1.11-1.19), living in a residential institution (PRR 2.30, CI 2.19-2.40), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score 1-2 (PRR 1.50, CI 1.45-1.55), CCI score 3+ (PRR 1.62, CI 1.55-1.69), and several medications. Interpretation - The prevalence of SSRI use was high among hip fracture patients compared with the general population. Our data stress the importance of continued clinical awareness of frailty, comorbidity, and polypharmacy of hip fracture patients and the potentially adverse drug effects of SSRI treatment.

Association Between Antidepressant Drug Use and Hip Fracture in Older People Before and After Treatment Initiation

IMPORTANCE

Treatment with antidepressants has been associated with hip fracture. This association could restrict the treatment options, especially in older patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between antidepressant drug treatment and hip fracture starting 1 year before the initiation of treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this nationwide cohort study, 204 072 individuals in the Prescribed Drugs Register of Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare aged 65 years or older who had a prescription of antidepressants filled between July 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011, were matched by birth year and sex to 1 control participant who was not prescribed antidepressants (for a total of 408 144 people in the register). Outcome data were collected from 1 year before to 1 year after the index date (date of prescription being filled). Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2005, to December 31, 2012.

EXPOSURES

First filled prescription of an antidepressant drug.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incident hip fractures occurring in the year before and year after initiation of antidepressant therapy were registered. Associations were investigated using multivariable conditional logistic regression models and flexible parametric models.

RESULTS

Of the 408 144 people in the register who were included in the study, 257 486 (63.1%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 80.1 (7.2) years. Antidepressant users sustained more than twice as many hip fractures than did nonusers in the year before and year after the initiation of therapy (2.8% vs 1.1% and 3.5% vs 1.3%, respectively, per actual incidence figures). In adjusted analyses, the odds ratios were highest for the associations between antidepressant use and hip fracture 16 to 30 days before the prescription was filled (odds ratio, 5.76; 95% CI, 4.73-7.01). In all separate analyses of age groups, of men and women, and of individual antidepressants, the highest odds ratios were seen 16 to 30 days before initiation of treatment, and no clear dose-response relationship was seen.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The present study found an association between antidepressant drug use and hip fracture before and after the initiation of therapy. This finding raises questions about the association that should be further investigated in treatment studies.

Tricyclic Antidepressant and/or γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Analog Use Is Associated With Fall Risk in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Peripheral neuropathy is a common diabetes complication that can increase fall risk. Regarding fall risk, the impact of pain management using tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogs is unclear because these medications can also cause falls. This study investigates the impact of these drugs on fall and fracture risk in older diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) patients.

DESIGN

Historical cohort study with 1-to-1 propensity matching of TCA/GABA-analog users and nonusers.

SETTING

Nationally representative 5% Medicare sample between the years 2008 and 2010.

PARTICIPANTS

After applying all selection criteria, 5,550 patients with prescription and 22,200 patients without prescription of TCAs/GABA-analogs were identified. Both patient groups were then stratified for fall history and matched based on propensity of receiving TCAs/GABA-analogs within each group.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients were followed until the first incidence of fall or the first incidence of fracture during the follow-up period (for up to 5 years).

RESULTS

After matching, users and nonusers were largely similar. After covariate adjustment, TCA/GABA-analog use was associated with a statistically significant increase in fall risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.20), but was not associated with fracture risk (adjusted HR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.99-1.19) in the conventional analysis. Treating TCA/GABA-analog use as a time-dependent covariate resulted in statistically significant associations of TCA/GABA-analog use with both fall and fracture risk (HR = 1.26 [95% CI = 1.17-1.36]; and HR = 1.12 [95% CI = 1.02-1.24], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among older patients with DPN, GABA-analogs or TCAs increase fall risk and possibly fracture risk. Use of these medications is therefore a potentially modifiable risk factor for falls and fractures in this population.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor use and risk of fractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use and risk of fractures in older adults.

METHODS

We systematically identified and analyzed observational studies comparing SSRI/SNRI use for depression with non-SSRI/SNRI use with a primary outcome of risk of fractures in older adults. We searched for studies in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, DARE (Database of Abstracts or Reviews of Effects), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science clinical trial research registers from 2011 for SSRIs and 1990 for SNRIs to November 29, 2016.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies met our inclusion criteria; 23 studies were included in meta-analysis: 9 case-control studies and 14 cohort studies. A 1.67-fold increase in the risk of fracture for SSRI users compared with nonusers was observed (relative risk 1.67, 95% CI 1.56-1.79, P = .000). The risk of fracture increases with their long-term use: within 1 year, the risk is 2.9% or 1 additional fracture in every 85 users; within 5 years, the risk is 13.4% or 1 additional fracture in every 19 users. In meta-regression, we found that the increase in risk did not differ across age groups (odds ratio = 1.006; P = .173). A limited number of studies on SNRI use and the risk of fractures prevented us from conducting a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review showed an association between risk of fracture and the use of SSRIs, especially with increasing use. Age does not increase this risk. No such conclusions can be drawn about the effect of SNRIs on the risk of fracture because of a lack of studies.

How complete is the information on preadmission psychotropic medications in inpatients with dementia? A comparison of hospital medical records with dispensing data

OBJECTIVES

Reliable information on preadmission medications is essential for inpatients with dementia, but its quality has hardly been evaluated. We assessed the completeness of information and factors associated with incomplete recording.

METHODS

We compared preadmission medications recorded in hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) with community-pharmacy dispensations in hospitalizations with discharge code for dementia at the University Hospital of Udine, Italy, 2012-2014. We calculated: (a) prevalence of omissions (dispensed medication not recorded in EMRs), additions (medication recorded in EMRs not dispensed), and discrepancies (any omission or addition); (b) multivariable logistic regression odds ratio, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), of ≥1 omission.

RESULTS

Among 2,777 hospitalizations, 86.1% had ≥1 discrepancy for any medication (Kappa 0.10) and 33.4% for psychotropics. When psychotropics were recorded in EMR, antipsychotics were added in 71.9% (antidepressants: 29.2%, antidementia agents: 48.2%); when dispensed, antipsychotics were omitted in 54.4% (antidepressants: 52.7%, antidementia agents: 41.5%). Omissions were 92% and twice more likely in patients taking 5 to 9 and ≥10 medications (vs. 0 to 4), 17% in patients with psychiatric disturbances (vs. none), and 41% with emergency admission (vs. planned).

CONCLUSION

Psychotropics, commonly used in dementia, were often incompletely recorded. To enhance information completeness, both EMRs and dispensations should be used.

Small-scale implementation with pragmatic process evaluation: a model developed in primary health care

BACKGROUND

Research often fails to impose substantial shifts in clinical practice. Evidence-based health care requires implementation of documented interventions, with implementation research as a science-informed strategy to identify core experiences from the process and share preconditions for achievement. Evidence developed in hospital contexts is often neither relevant nor feasible for primary care. Different evidence types may constitute a point of departure, stretching and testing the transferability of the intervention by piloting it in primary care. Comprehensive descriptions of aims, context and procedures can be a more useful outcome than traditional effect studies.

MAIN TEXT

We present a model for small-scale implementation of relevant research evidence, monitored by pragmatic evaluation. The model, which is applicable in primary care, is supported by Weiner's theory about organizational readiness for change and consists of four steps: 1) recognize the problem - identify a workable intervention, 2) assess the context - prepare for inception, 3) pilot the intervention on site, and 4) upscale and accomplish the intervention. The process is evaluated by exploring selected relevant aspects of experiences and outcomes from the first to the last step. Process evaluation is a logical precondition for outcome evaluation - attempting to assess either the efficacy or the effectiveness of a "black box" intervention makes no sense. We argue why evidence beyond effect studies and evaluation beyond randomized controlled trials may be adequate for science-informed evaluation of a small-scale implementation project such as is often conducted by primary health care practitioners. The model is illustrated by an ongoing project, in which a strategy for upgrading the management of depression in nursing homes in Norway is currently being implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

A flexible and manageable approach is suggested, in which the inevitable unpredictability of clinical practice is incorporated. Finding the appropriate middle ground between rigour and flexibility, some compromises must be made. Our model recognizes the skills of practical knowing as something other than traditional medical research, while maintaining academic values such as systematic and transparent reflection, using adequate tools. Considering the purpose and context of our model, we argue that these priorities, emphasizing relevance and feasibility, are strengths, not limitations.

Risk of hip fractures in patients with depressive disorders: A nationwide, population-based, retrospective, cohort study

Background

Some studies have suggested that depressive disorders may play a vital role in the incidence of hip fractures. However, nationwide data are lacking regarding the association between depressive disorders and hip fractures.

Objective

We aimed to explore the association between depressive disorders and new-onset hip fractures.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 11,207 patients with depressive disorders and 11,207 control patients using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the risk of hip fractures in patients with depressive disorders.

Results

The incidence rate ratio of hip fractures between patients with depressive disorders and controls was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29–1.99, P < .001). After adjustment for potential confounders in multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model, patients with depressive disorders were found to have 1.34 times higher risk of hip fractures than controls (95% CI = 1.08–1.66, P = .008). Furthermore, age (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.43, 95% CI = 4.94–11.19, P < .001), hypertension (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.17–2.28, P = .004), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.08–1.99, P = .014), cerebrovascular disease (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.31–2.35, P < .001), living in rural areas (HR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.30–2.70, P = .001), and low monthly income (NT$0–NT$19,000: HR = 4.08, 95% CI = 1.79–9.29, P = .001 and NT$19,100–NT$42,000: HR = 4.09, 95% CI = 1.76–9.49, P = .001) were independent risk factors for new-onset hip fractures in patients with depressive disorders.

Conclusion

Depressive disorders might increase the risk of new-onset hip fractures, particularly in older patients and patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, or low socioeconomic status.

Antidepressant use and risk of hip fractures among community-dwelling persons with and without Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

To study whether antidepressant use is associated with an increased risk of hip fracture among community-dwelling persons with and without Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to compare the risk according to duration of use and between antidepressant groups.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study, including 50,491 persons with AD (mean age 80) and 100,982 comparison persons without AD from Finnish register-based MEDALZ cohort. Antidepressant use was compared with nonuse with Cox proportional hazard models. Incident users were identified with a one year washout period from Prescription register data. Main outcome was hospitalization due to hip fracture.

RESULTS

During antidepressant use, the age-adjusted rate of hip fractures per 100 person-years was 3.01 (95% CI 2.75-3.34) among persons with and 2.28 (1.94-2.61) among persons without AD. Antidepressant use was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture among persons with and without AD (adjusted HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.45-1.80 and 2.71, 2.35-3.14, respectively) compared with nonuse. The risk was most prominent in the beginning of use and was elevated even up to 4 years. The risk was increased with all of the most frequently used antidepressants.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant use is associated with an increased risk of hip fracture among older persons. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Drug exposure in register-based research-An expert-opinion based evaluation of methods

BACKGROUND

In register-based pharmacoepidemiological studies, construction of drug exposure periods from drug purchases is a major methodological challenge. Various methods have been applied but their validity is rarely evaluated. Our objective was to conduct an expert-opinion based evaluation of the correctness of drug use periods produced by different methods.

METHODS

Drug use periods were calculated with three fixed methods: time windows, assumption of one Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per day and one tablet per day, and with PRE2DUP that is based on modelling of individual drug purchasing behavior. Expert-opinion based evaluation was conducted with 200 randomly selected purchase histories of warfarin, bisoprolol, simvastatin, risperidone and mirtazapine in the MEDALZ-2005 cohort (28,093 persons with Alzheimer's disease). Two experts reviewed purchase histories and judged which methods had joined correct purchases and gave correct duration for each of 1000 drug exposure periods.

RESULTS

The evaluated correctness of drug use periods was 70-94% for PRE2DUP, and depending on grace periods and time window lengths 0-73% for tablet methods, 0-41% for DDD methods and 0-11% for time window methods. The highest rate of evaluated correct solutions for each method class were observed for 1 tablet per day with 180 days grace period (TAB_1_180, 43-73%), and 1 DDD per day with 180 days grace period (1-41%). Time window methods produced at maximum only 11% correct solutions. The best performing fixed method TAB_1_180 reached highest correctness for simvastatin 73% (95% CI 65-81%) whereas 89% (95% CI 84-94%) of PRE2DUP periods were judged as correct.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows inaccuracy of fixed methods and the urgent need for new data-driven methods. In the expert-opinion based evaluation, the lowest error rates were observed with data-driven method PRE2DUP.

Associations between pain and depression in nursing home patients at different stages of dementia

BACKGROUND

Pain is associated with depression in nursing home patients with dementia. It is, however, unclear whether pain increases depression. Therefore we evaluated the prospective associations between pain and depressive symptoms in nursing home patients at different stages of cognitive impairment.

METHODS

Two longitudinal studies were combined, including 931 patients (≥65 years) from 65 nursing homes. One study assessed patients at admission, with 6-month follow-up (2012-2014). The other study assessed residents with varying lengths of stay, with 4-month follow-up (2014-2015). Patients were assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Mobilisation-Observation-Behaviour-Intensity-Dementia-2 Pain Scale, and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia.

RESULTS

At baseline, 343 patients (40% of 858 assessed) had moderate to severe pain, and 347 (38% of 924) had depression. Pain increased the risk of depression (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.76-3.12). Using mixed model analyses, we found that a 1-point increase in pain was associated with a .48 increase in depression (p<.001). This association persisted in mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment. In those recently admitted, depressive symptoms decreased over time, and having less pain at follow-up was associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms (within-subject effect; p=.042).

LIMITATIONS

The two cohorts had different inclusion criteria, which may reduce generalisability. The study design does not allow conclusions on causality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and depressive symptoms are associated in patients with dementia. Because reduced pain is associated with less depressive symptoms, these patients should be assessed regularly for untreated pain. The benefit of analgesic treatment should be weighed carefully against the potential for adverse effects.

Bipolar disorder and the risk of fracture: A nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The co-primary aims are: 1) to compare the risk of fracture between adults with bipolar disorder and those without bipolar disorder; and 2) to assess whether lithium, anticonvulsants and antipsychotics reduce risk of fracture among individuals with bipolar disorder.

METHODS

The analysis herein is a population-based retrospective cohort study, utilizing the National Health Insurance (NHI) medical claims data collected between 1997 and 2013 in Taiwan. We identified 3705 cases with incident diagnoses of bipolar disorder during study period and 37,050 matched controls without bipolar diagnoses. Incident diagnosis of fracture was operationalized as any bone fracture after the diagnosis of bipolar disorder or after the matched index date for controls.

RESULTS

Bipolar patients had significantly higher risk of facture when compared to matched controls (17.6% versus 11.7%, respectively p<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]＝1.23-1.48, p<0.001) after adjusting for covariates. Persons with bipolar disorder and a prior history of psychiatric hospitalization were had higher risk for bone fracture than those without prior history of psychiatric hospitalization when compared to match controls. Higher cumulative dose of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers did not increase the risk of fracture.

LIMITATIONS

The diagnoses of bipolar disorder were not confirmed with structured clinical interview. Drug adherence, exact exposure dosage, smoking, lifestyle, nutrition and exercise habits were unable to be assessed in our dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar disorder is associated with increased risk of fracture, and higher cumulative dose of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics did not further increase the risk of fracture.

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bone health: A review of clinical studies and plausible mechanisms

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are currently the treatment of choice in depression and constitute major portion of prescription in depressive patients. The role of serotonin receptors in bone is emerging, raising certain questions regarding the effect of blockade of serotonin reuptake in the bone metabolism. Clinical studies have reported an association of SSRI antidepressants which with increase in fracture and decrease in bone mineral density. This review focus on recent evidence that evaluate the association of SSRIs with the risk of fracture and bone mineral density and also the probable mechanisms that might be involved in such effects.

Psychotropics and weak opioid analgesics in plasma samples of older hip fracture patients - detection frequencies and consistency with drug records

AIMS

To determine use of psychotropic drugs and weak opioids in hip fracture patients by analysing plasma samples at admission, and compare detected drug frequencies with prescription registry data and drug records.

METHODS

Plasma from 250 hip fracture patients aged ≥65 years sampled at hospital admission were analysed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods for detection of psychotropic drugs and weak opioid analgesics (alcohol also determined). Odds ratios for drugs detected in plasma of hip fracture patients vs. prescription frequencies of the same drugs in an age-, time- and region-matched reference population were calculated. Moreover, recorded and measured drugs were compared.

RESULTS

Psychotropic drugs and/or weak opioid analgesics were detected in 158 (63%) of the patients (median age 84 years; 76% females), while alcohol was found in 19 patients (7.6%). The occurrence of diazepam (odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.4), nitrazepam (2.3; 1.3-4.1), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (1.9; 1.3-2.9) and mirtazapine (2.3; 1.2-4.3) was significantly higher in plasma samples of hip fracture patients than in prescription data from the reference population. Poor consistency between recorded and measured drugs was disclosed for z-hypnotics and benzodiazepines; e.g. diazepam was detected in 29 (11.6%), but only recorded in six (2.4%) of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma analysis shows that use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in hip fracture patients is significantly more frequent than respective prescription frequencies in the general elderly population. Moreover, consistency between recorded and actual use of psychotropic fall-risk drugs is poor at hospital admission of hip fracture patients.

Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Hip Fracture in the Elderly: A Case-Control Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

This population based study investigated the relationship between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and hip fractures in the elderly in Taiwan.

METHODS

Analysis of a random sample of 1 million insurance enrollees' data identified 4,891 patients with newly diagnosed hip fractures and 4,891 controls without hip fracture between 2000 and 2011. Both cases and controls were ≥65 years of age and were matched by sex, age, comorbidities, and index year of hip fracture diagnosis. Patients were considered current SSRI users if their last SSRI tablet was taken ≤7 days before the hip fracture diagnosis. Late use of SSRIs was defined as taking the last SSRI tablet ≥8 days before the hip fracture diagnosis. Non-SSRI users comprised individuals who never had an SSRI prescription. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for hip fracture associated with SSRI use was estimated by multivariate unconditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

After adjustment for covariants, multivariate regression analysis showed that the adjusted OR of hip fracture was 2.17 for current SSRI users (95% CI: 1.60-2.93) compared with those who never used SSRIs. The adjusted OR was 1.11 for individuals with late use of SSRIs (95% CI: 0.96-1.28) and was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Current use of SSRIs was associated with a 2.17-fold increase in the odds of hip fracture in the elderly in Taiwan. Clinicians should consider the possibility of SSRI-associated hip fracture among old people currently taking SSRIs.

Non-tricyclic and Non-selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants and Recurrent Falls in Frail Older Women

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of recurrent falls associated with antidepressants other than tricyclics (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) among frail older women.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the Zoledronic acid in frail Elders to STrengthen bone, or ZEST, trial data treated as a longitudinal cohort in 181 frail, osteoporotic women aged ≥65 years in long-term care. The primary exposure was individual non-TCA/non-SSRI antidepressants (i.e., serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, mirtazapine, trazodone, and bupropion) at baseline and 6 months. The main outcome was recurrent (at least two) falls within 6 months after antidepressant exposure. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using a generalized estimating equations model.

RESULTS

At least 15% of women experienced recurrent falls between 0-6 and 6-12 months. At baseline and 6 months, 18.2% and 6.9% had a non-TCA/non-SSRI antidepressant, respectively. Adjusting for demographics, health status, and other drugs that increase risk of falls, non-TCA/non-SSRI antidepressant exposure significantly increased the risk of recurrent falls (AOR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.01-4.54). Fall risk further increased after removing bupropion from the non-TCA/non-SSRI antidepressant group in sensitivity analyses (AOR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.24-6.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Other antidepressant classes may not be safer than TCAs/SSRIs with respect to recurrent falls in frail older women.

Do Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) Cause Fractures?

Recent meta-analyses report a 70 % increase in fracture risk in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) users compared to non-users; however, included studies were observational and limited in their ability to establish causality. Here, we use the Bradford Hill criteria to explore causality between SSRIs and fractures. We found a strong, consistent, and temporal relationship between SSRIs and fractures, which appears to follow a biological gradient. However, specificity and biological plausibility remain concerns. In terms of specificity, the majority of available data have limitations due to either confounding by indication or channeling bias. Self-controlled case series address some of these limitations and provide relatively strong observational evidence for a causal relationship between SSRIs and fracture. In doing so, they suggest that falls contribute to fractures in SSRI users. Whether there are also underlying changes in skeletal properties remains unresolved. Initial studies provide some evidence for skeletal effects of SSRIs; however, the pathways involved need to be established before biological plausibility can be accepted. As the link between SSRIs and fractures is based on observational data and not evidence from prospective trials, there is insufficient evidence to definitively determine a causal relationship and it appears premature to label SSRIs as a secondary cause of osteoporosis. SSRIs appear to contribute to fracture-inducing falls, and addressing any fall risk associated with SSRIs may be an efficient approach to reducing SSRI-related fractures. As fractures stemming from SSRI-induced falls are more likely in individuals with compromised bone health, it is worth considering bone density testing and intervention for those presenting with risk factors for osteoporosis.

Effects of depression and antidepressant medications on hip fracture: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of depression and antidepressant medications on hip fracture. The database of the Taiwan National Health Insurance with medical records of more than 1,000,000 individuals was searched for patients who had hip fracture with or without depression from 1998 to 2009. Patients with the following conditions were excluded: hip fracture due to cancer or traffic accidents, hip fracture that occurred before the diagnosis of depression, and use of antidepressants before the diagnosis of depression. A matched cohort of 139,110 patients was investigated, including 27,822 (17,309 females; 10,513 males) with depression and 111,288 (69,236 females; 42,052 males) without depression (1:4 randomly matched with age, sex, and index date). Among these patients, 232 (158 females and 74 males) had both hip fracture and depression, and 690 (473 females and 217 males) had hip fracture only. The Cox proportional-hazards regression method was used to determine the effect of depression on hip fracture. The hazard ratio (HR) for each clinical parameter was calculated after adjusting for confounders including sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, urbanization, osteoporosis, and antidepressants. Results showed that patients with major depressive disorder had a 61% higher incidence of hip fracture than those without depression (HR 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.18, P = 0.002). The risk of hip fracture for patients with less severe depressive disorder (dysthymia or depressive disorder, not otherwise specified) was not statistically higher than that of patients with no depression (HR 1.10, 95% CI = 0.91-1.34, P = 0.327). Among the patients with depression, females had a 49% higher incidence for hip fracture than males (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.72, P < 0.001). The incidence of hip fracture also increased with age and Charlson comorbidity index scores. Analyses of both all (139,110) patients and only patients (27,822) with depression revealed that antidepressants had no negative impact on the incidence of hip fracture. In conclusion, major depression was found to be a risk factor for hip fracture and that use of antidepressants had no adverse effect on hip fracture in the Taiwanese population.

The population attributable risk of nutrition and lifestyle on hip fractures

INTRODUCTION

Norway is among the countries with the highest incidence of hip fractures, and how to reduce this incidence is a major public health concern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The population attributable risk (PAR), which measures the portion of hip fracture incidences in the population that can be attributed to an exposure if there is a causal relationship, was assessed for the exposure to excessive alcohol consumption, being underweight, low calcium from dairy products, low physical activity and current tobacco smoking. The risk ratio (RR) of the exposures summarized from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as well as their prevalence from national statistics or Norwegian population-based studies, were used to estimate PARs.

RESULTS

Low physical activity and current tobacco smoking had the highest RR for hip fractures, with 1.65 (95% CI 1.50-1.81) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.41-1.63). Low physical activity had the highest prevalence in the population (27.4%) and the highest PAR (0.151), followed by tobacco smoking (PAR = 0.081) and excessive alcohol consumption (PAR = 0.01). By comparison, being underweight and low calcium from dairy products had negligible PAR estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

From a public health perspective, increased daily physical activity is the most promising intervention to reduce the incidence of hip fractures. Reduced smoking and alcohol consumption are of relevance, but other health risks related to these exposures are of greater public health concern. Low body weight and nutritional calcium from dairy products seem to be of less importance.