Deprescribing: the emerging evidence for and the practice of the 'geriatrician's salute'

L-Thyroxin bei Hypothyreose – absetzen oder nicht?

Hintergrund

L‑Thyroxin ist eines der am häufigsten verordneten Arzneimittel in Deutschland. Es wird hauptsächlich zur Behandlung der Hypothyreose eingesetzt. Aufgrund von Verordnungsdaten ist davon auszugehen, dass L‑Thyroxin häufiger verordnet wird als es medizinisch indiziert ist.

Ziel der Arbeit

Sind hausärztlich Tätige bereit, Dosisreduktionen oder Absetzversuche von L‑Thyroxin vorzunehmen?

Methodik

Auf der Jahrestagung der Sächsischen Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin erfolgte eine Querschnittserhebung mittels Fragebogen. Dieser beinhaltete 3 konstruierte Fälle, deren L‑Thyroxin-Therapie auf Änderungspotenzial zu bewerten war. Es erfolgte eine deskriptive Analyse der quantitativen Daten sowie eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt nahmen 33 hausärztlich Tätige an der Befragung teil. Am häufigsten wurde eine Beibehaltung der Dosis oder sogar eine Dosiserhöhung favorisiert. Dies wurde mit guter Therapieeinstellung, mutmaßlich fehlendem Nachteil einer geringen Dosis oder der Vermeidung von Komplikationen begründet. Selten wurde eine Reduktion oder ein Absetzen vorgeschlagen. Für das Absetzen oder Dosisreduktion wurde sich mit Verweis auf die fehlende medizinische Indikation ausgesprochen.

Diskussion

Auch bei fehlender medizinischer Indikation waren die Teilnehmenden zurückhaltend, eine bestehende Therapie zu verändern. Dies deckt sich mit Angaben aus der existierenden Literatur. Die Annahme der Vermeidung von Folgeerkrankungen, begrenzte Zeit für Beratungsgespräche und mangelnde Kommunikation zwischen Verordnenden wurden in anderen Studien als Ursachen identifiziert. Dabei gibt es Hinweise auf den Nutzen von Deprescribing. Es besteht diesbezüglich im deutschen primärärztlichen Bereich noch großer Forschungsbedarf.

The effect of deprescribing interventions on mortality and health outcomes in older people: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Previous systematic reviews suggest that deprescribing may improve survival, particularly in frail older people. Evidence is rapidly accumulating, suggesting a need for an updated review of the literature.

METHODS

We updated a 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis to include studies published from inception to 26 April 2024 from specified databases. Studies in which older people had at least one medication deprescribed were included and grouped by study designs and targeted medications. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. Odds ratios (OR) or mean differences were calculated as the effect measures using either the Mantel-Haenszel or generic inverse-variance method with fixed- or random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were adverse drug withdrawal events, physical health, cognitive function, quality of life and effect on medication regimen. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and intervention types.

RESULTS

A total of 259 studies (reported in 286 papers) were included in this updated review. Deprescribing polypharmacy did not result in a significant reduction in mortality in both randomized (OR 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.09) and non-randomized studies (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36-1.38). Further subgroup analyses of randomized studies on deprescribing polypharmacy demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality in the young old (aged 65-79) (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and when patient-specific interventions were applied (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Deprescribing can be achieved with potentially important benefits in terms of improved survival, particularly when patient-specific interventions are applied and initiated early in the young old.

Physicians' views on pharmacists' involvement in hospital deprescribing: A qualitative study on proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacists have a pivotal role in the management of the patient's medication. However, it is necessary to know how pharmacist-mediated deprescribing could be implemented in a hospital setting according to hospital physicians.

OBJECTIVE

To explore physicians' views on the involvement of hospital pharmacists in the deprescribing process using the example of PPIs.

METHODS

A qualitative study using two focus groups with hospital physicians was conducted to determine their attitudes regarding deprescribing initiated by the hospital pharmacist. The interviews were recorded and transcribed using the NVivo analysis software. A thematic analysis led to a categorization of all the verbatims.

RESULTS

Hospital doctors are reluctant to deprescribe drugs initiated by a colleague and feel that it is the responsibility of the general practitioner (GP), who fails to do so due to lack of time. In this situation, the hospital pharmacist is in the best position to deprescribe because of his/her expertise in drug therapy. This should be a discussion between the hospital pharmacist, the hospital doctor, the GP and the patient. Deprescribing should always be adapted to the patient's context.

CONCLUSION

Hospital physicians are open to a pharmacist-mediated, patient-centred approach to deprescribing as long as the GP is involved.

Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement of outcomes for deprescribing intervention studies. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the outcome categories used in deprescribing intervention trials and to relate them to the previously published recommendations.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library from January 2012 through January 2022. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating a deprescribing intervention. After data extraction, outcomes were categorized by type: medication outcomes, clinical outcomes, system outcomes, implementation outcomes, and other outcomes based on the previously published recommendations.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included. The majority of studies focused on older adults in nursing homes and targeted inappropriate medications or polypharmacy. In 20 studies, the intervention was a medication review; in seven studies, the intervention was educational or informative; and three studies based their intervention on motivational interviewing or patient empowerment. Thirty-one studies presented a medication outcome (primary outcome in 26 studies), 25 a clinical outcome, 18 a system outcome, and seven an implementation outcome. Only three studies presented all four types of outcomes, and 10 studies presented three types of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an update on the implementation of gold standard deprescribing studies in clinical practice. Implementation outcomes need to be developed and specified to facilitate the implementation of these practices on a larger scale and clinical outcome need to be prioritized. Finally, this review provides new elements for future real-life deprescribing studies.

Recommendations for outcome measurement for deprescribing intervention studies

Interpreting results from deprescribing interventions to generate actionable evidence is challenging owing to inconsistent and heterogeneous outcome definitions between studies. We sought to characterize deprescribing intervention outcomes and recommend approaches to measure outcomes for future studies. A scoping literature review focused on deprescribing interventions for polypharmacy and informed a series of expert panel discussions and recommendations. Twelve experts in deprescribing research, policy, and clinical practice interventions participating in the Measures Workgroup of the US Deprescribing Research Network sought to characterize deprescribing outcomes and recommend approaches to measure outcomes for future studies. The scoping review identified 125 papers reflecting 107 deprescribing studies. Common outcomes included medication discontinuation, medication appropriateness, and a broad range of clinical outcomes potentially resulting from medication reduction. Panel recommendations included clearly defining clinically meaningful medication outcomes (e.g., number of chronic medications, dose reductions), ensuring adequate sample size and follow-up time to capture clinical outcomes resulting from medication discontinuation (e.g., quality of life [QOL]), and selecting appropriate and feasible data sources. A new conceptual model illustrates how downstream clinical outcomes (e.g., reduction in falls) should be interpreted in the context of initial changes in medication measures (e.g., reduction in mean total medications). Areas needing further development include implementation outcomes specific to deprescribing interventions and measures of adverse drug withdrawal events. Generating evidence to guide deprescribing is essential to address patient, caregiver, and clinician concerns about the benefits and harms of medication discontinuation. This article provides recommendations and an initial conceptual framework for selecting and applying appropriate intervention outcomes to support deprescribing research.

Evaluating the impact of a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets tool on healthcare practitioners' confidence, perceptions and experiences of stopping inappropriate medicines

BACKGROUND

Issues of medication adherence, multimorbidity, increased hospitalisation risk and negative impact upon quality of life have led to the management of polypharmacy becoming a national priority. Clinical guidelines advise a patient-centred approach, involving shared decision-making and multidisciplinary team working. However, there have been limited educational initiatives to improve healthcare practitioners' management of polypharmacy and stopping inappropriate medicines. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets (ALS) tool across five areas: i. healthcare practitioners' confidence and perceptions of stopping medicines; ii. knowledge and information sources around stopping medicines; iii. perception of patients and stopping medicines; iv. perception of colleagues and stopping medicines and v. perception of the role of institutional factors in stopping medicines.

METHODS

The ALS tool was delivered to a multi-disciplinary group of healthcare practitioners: GPs [n = 24] and pharmacy professionals [n = 9]. A pre-post survey with 28 closed statements across five domains relating to the study aims [n = 32] and a post evaluation feedback survey with 4 open-ended questions [n = 33] were completed. Paired pre-post ALS responses [n = 32] were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Qualitative responses were analysed using a simplified version of the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

The ALS tool showed significant improvement in 14 of 28 statements in the pre-post survey across the five domains. Qualitative themes (QT) from the post evaluation feedback survey include: i. awareness and management of polypharmacy; ii. opportunity to share experiences; iii. usefulness of ALS as a learning tool and iv. equipping with tools and information. Synthesised themes (ST) from analysis of pre-post survey data and post evaluation feedback survey data include: i. awareness, confidence and management of inappropriate polypharmacy, ii. equipping with knowledge, information, tools and resources and iii. decision-making and discussion about stopping medicines with colleagues in different settings.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation contributes to developing understanding of the role of educational initiatives in improving inappropriate polypharmacy, demonstrating the effectiveness of the ALS tool in improving healthcare practitioners' awareness, confidence and perceptions in stopping inappropriate medicines. Further evaluation is required to examine impact of the ALS tool in different localities as well as longer-term impact.

Geriatric medicine and health care for older people in Australia

Aged care coverage in Australia is universal but fragmented and has been challenged by government policy to deregulate aged care and open it up to market forces. A recent inquiry into aged care (Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety) documented the outcome of this policy-substandard care at most levels. The provision of services to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, who have high prevalence of frailty and cognitive impairment, was also identified as inadequate. The effects of yet to be implemented changes in policy and funding in response to this report remain to be seen. Despite this policy backdrop, geriatricians have contributed to a steady growth in medical services and interventions focussed on specific geriatric issues such as dementia, falls, polypharmacy and orthogeriatrics. These are often driven by, or in collaboration with researchers, and aim to generate research data as well as provide patient care. The numbers of academic geriatricians and other aged care health professionals is increasing, and the training of specialist geriatricians now includes a significant research component.

Medication Optimization for New Initiators of Empagliflozin for Diabetic Kidney Disease

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are recommended agents for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors lower blood glucose, decrease blood pressure, and can be useful for volume management. For these reasons, we hypothesized that initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may be associated with deprescribing of other medications in patients with DKD. We compared medication lists at SGLT2 inhibitor initiation and 6 months post-initiation in 21 patients with DKD who were followed in our interprofessional outpatient nephrology clinic to evaluate deprescribing patterns in diabetes, hypertension, and diuretic medications. Six months of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with DKD was associated with deprescribing of high-risk diabetes agents, antihypertensives, and loop diuretics with minimal changes in A1C and fewer adverse events.

Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review

Background

Patients receiving palliative care often have existing comorbidities necessitating the prescribing of multiple medications. To maximize quality of life in this patient cohort, it is important to tailor prescribing of medication for preventing and treating existing illnesses and those for controlling symptoms, such as pain, according to individual specific needs.

Objectives

To provide an overview of peer-reviewed observational research on prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care.

Methods

A systematic scoping review was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science). Each database was searched from inception to May 2020. Search terms included 'palliative care,' 'end of life,' and 'prescribing.' Eligible studies had to examine prescribing for adults (≥18 years) receiving palliative care in any setting as a study aim or outcome. Studies focusing on single medication types (e.g., opioids), medication classes (e.g., chemotherapy), or clinical indications (e.g., pain) were excluded. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for scoping reviews, and the findings were described using narrative synthesis.

Results

Following deduplication, 16,565 unique citations were reviewed, and 56 studies met inclusion criteria. The average number of prescribed medications per patient ranged from 3 to 23. Typically, prescribing changes involved decreases in preventative medications and increases in symptom-specific medications closer to the time of death. Twenty-one studies assessed the appropriateness of prescribing using various tools. The prevalence of patients with ≥1 potentially inappropriate prescription ranged from 15 to 92%. Three studies reported on adverse drug events.

Conclusions

This scoping review provides a broad overview of existing research and shows that many patients receiving palliative care receive multiple medications closer to the time of death. Future research should focus in greater detail on prescribing appropriateness using tools specifically developed to guide prescribing in palliative care and the potential for harm.

Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices toward deprescribing: a protocol of cross-sectional study (Desmedica Study-Brazil)

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing is the planned and supervised process of dose reduction or stopping of medication that might be causing harm, or no longer be of benefit. It is an activity that should be a normal part of care/the prescribing cycle. Although now broadly recognised, there are still challenges in its effective implementation.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate an instrument to measure Brazilian healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices towards deprescribing.

METHODS

This study will include the following steps: (1) development of the preliminary instrument; (2) content validation; (3) pilot study; (4) evaluation of psychometric characteristics. After the elaboration of items of the instrument through the literature review, we will use a hybrid Delphi method to develop and establish the content validity of the instrument. Further, a pilot survey will be performed with 30 healthcare professionals. Finally, for the evaluation of psychometric characteristics, a cross-sectional study will be accomplished with a representative sample of different healthcare professionals from different Brazilian states using respondent-driven sampling. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis will be performed. For assessing the model fit, we will use the ratio of χ² and df (χ²/df), comparative fit index, the goodness of fit index and root mean square error of approximation. In addition, the reliability of the instrument will be estimated by test-retest reproducibility and Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee for Research at the University of Sorocaba (ethics approval number: 3.848.916) approved the study. Study findings will be circulated to healthcare professionals and scientists in the field through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

[Validation into Spanish of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire to assess patients' attitudes towards deprescribing. Research protocol]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy has become a priority public health problem in developed countries. In response to its approach, deprescription stands out. Its success will depend largely on the attitudes and beliefs of patients towards the number of drugs they are taking and their willingness to initiate a process of deprescription. To explore these factors, researchers have developed the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire, originally in English. The objective of this study is the validation into Spanish of rPATD questionnaire, both older adults and caregivers versions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A first qualitative validation phase and a second phase of analysis of its psychometric characteristics will be carried out through an observational descriptive study of validation of a measurement instrument. One hundred and twenty subjects (polymedicated older adults and caregivers) from three health centers will be selected by consecutive sampling. The questionnaire will be provided and clinical and sociodemographic data will be collected. Feasibility, reliability (through internal consistency and intraobserver reliability) and validity (apparent, construct and criterion) of the questionnaire will be evaluated.

EXPECTED RESULTS

It is expected to obtain a questionnaire that will serve as a tool for the clinician to identify patients with a favorable predisposition to deprescription and that will allow to contribute the patient's perspective to this process.

CONCLUSION

The use of the rPATD questionnaire, alone or integrated into other more complex interventions, may lead to an improvement in the quality of care for the polymedicated patients.

Potential Statin Overuse in Older Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Using French Health Insurance Databases

BACKGROUND

Although compelling evidence exists supporting statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) for secondary prevention in older patients with clinical atherosclerotic diseases, the same cannot be said for primary prevention.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to estimate the frequency of potential statin overuse in older patients, the potential drug cost savings if corrected, and the associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Alsace and Lorraine (France) from 1 January to 30 April 2017. All statin users aged 80 years or over living in the community (including nursing homes) and identified from the French health insurance database were analyzed. Potential statin overuse was defined according to the STOPP/START (Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria.

RESULTS

Among the 38,268 aged insured, 23,228 (60.7%) had potential statin overuse. Of those living in the community, 22,132 (60.0%) patients had potential statin overuse: 12,352 (55.8%) for primary and 9780 (44.2%) for secondary prevention. Among nursing home residents, 1096 (79.0%) had potential statin overuse: 394 (35.9%) for primary and 702 (64.1%) for secondary prevention. The potential drug cost savings associated with the adjustment of potential statin overuse were €924,100 for the study period. Living in nursing home [adjusted odds ratio (OR_adjusted) 3.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.82-5.41] and being a female (OR_adjusted 2.84, 95% CI 2.54-3.17) were the main risk factors associated with potential statin overuse.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of potential statin overuse is very high among older people aged 80 years or over, highlighting the need to re-evaluate statin therapy and consider deprescribing, particularly for primary prevention and in nursing homes.

Anticholinergic/sedative drug burden predicts worse memory acquisition in older racially/ethnically diverse patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Anticholinergic/sedative drug use, measured by the Drug Burden Index (DBI), is linked to cognitive impairment in older adults. Yet, studies on the DBI's association with neuropsychological functioning are lacking, especially in underserved groups at increased risk of cognitive impairment. We examined cross-sectional relationships between total DBI (DBI_T ) and an age-adjusted analogue (Adj DBI_T ) with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) in diverse adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Based on results of a prior study, we anticipated higher DBIs would be associated with worse memory at older ages.

METHODS

One hundred five adults with T2DM (age = 57 ± 9 years, 65% female, 62% Black, 27% Hispanic/Latino, Hb_A1c = 7.8 ± 1.8) participated. Although memory outcomes were normally distributed, DBI_T values were positively skewed. Spearman correlations assessed their bivariate relationships with RBANS. Adjusting for comorbidities, polypharmacy, Hb_A1c , and education, we tested the moderating effect of age on DBI-RBANS associations at mean ±1 standard deviations of age.

RESULTS

One third of the participants endorsed current sedative/anticholinergic use. Mean DBI_T was 0.385, and mean Adj DBI_T was 0.393 (ranges = 0.00-4.22). Drug burden negatively correlated with RBANS Immediate Memory (DBI_T r_s = -0.237, P = .013; Adj DBI_T r_s = -0.239, P = .014) but no other indices. There was a significant DBI*Age interaction; the negative effect of drug burden on Immediate Memory was significant for ages greater than or equal to 55 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedative/anticholinergic drug exposure was prevalent in these diverse T2DM patients. Adjusting for covariates, greater drug burden was associated with worse memory acquisition among older adults only. Prospective studies should examine these relationships over time and assess whether dementia biomarkers affect the interaction.

Factors Associated With Deprescribing Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Older Nursing Home Residents With Severe Dementia

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Uncertainty regarding benefits and risks associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) in severe dementia means providers do not know if and when to deprescribe. We sought to identify which patient-, provider-, and system-level characteristics are associated with AChEI discontinuation.

DESIGN

Analysis of 2015 to 2016 data from Medicare claims, Part D prescriptions, Minimum Data Set (MDS), version 3.0, Area Health Resource File, and Nursing Home Compare. Cox-proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates were used to identify patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with AChEI discontinuation (30-day or more gap in supply).

SETTING

US Medicare-certified nursing homes (NHs).

PARTICIPANTS

Nonskilled NH residents, aged 65 years and older, with severe dementia receiving AChEIs within the first 14 days of an MDS assessment in 2016 (n = 37 106).

RESULTS

The sample was primarily white (78.7%), female (75.5%), and aged 80 years or older (77.4%). The most commonly prescribed AChEIs were donepezil (77.8%), followed by transdermal rivastigmine (14.6%). The cumulative incidence of AChEI discontinuation was 29.7% at the end of follow-up (330 days), with mean follow-up times of 194 days for continuous users of AChEIs and 105 days for those who discontinued. Factors associated with increased likelihood of discontinuation were new admission, older age, difficulty being understood, aggressive behavior, poor appetite, weight loss, mechanically altered diet, limited prognosis designation, hospitalization in 90 days prior, and northeastern region. Factors associated with decreased likelihood of discontinuation included memantine use, use of strong anticholinergics, polypharmacy, rurality, and primary care prescriber vs geriatric specialist.

CONCLUSION

Among NH residents with severe dementia being treated with AChEIs, the cumulative incidence of AChEI discontinuation was just under 30% at 1 year of follow-up. Our findings provide insight into potential drivers of deprescribing AChEIs, identify system-level barriers to deprescribing, and help to inform covariates that are needed to address potential confounding in studies evaluating the potential risks and benefits associated with deprescribing. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1871-1879, 2019.