1
|
Li K, Zhu Q, Yang J, Zheng Y, Du S, Song M, Peng Q, Yang R, Liu Y, Qi L. Imaging and Liquid Biopsy for Distinguishing True Progression From Pseudoprogression in Gliomas, Current Advances and Challenges. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00162-4. [PMID: 38614827 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Gliomas are aggressive brain tumors with a poor prognosis. Assessing treatment response is challenging because magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not distinguish true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP). This review aims to discuss imaging techniques and liquid biopsies used to distinguish TP from PsP. MATERIALS AND METHODS This review synthesizes existing literature to examine advances in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance diffusion imaging (MRDI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) MRI, and liquid biopsies, for identifying TP or PsP through tumor markers and tissue characteristics. RESULTS Advanced imaging techniques, including MRDI and PWI MRI, have proven effective in delineating tumor tissue properties, offering valuable insights into glioma behavior. Similarly, liquid biopsy has emerged as a potent tool for identifying tumor-derived markers in biofluids, offering a non-invasive glimpse into tumor evolution. Despite their promise, these methodologies grapple with significant challenges. Their sensitivity remains inconsistent, complicating the accurate differentiation between TP and PSP. Furthermore, the absence of standardized protocols across platforms impedes the reliability of comparisons, while inherent biological variability adds complexity to data interpretation. CONCLUSION Their potential applications have been highlighted, but gaps remain before routine clinical use. Further research is needed to develop and validate these promising methods for distinguishing TP from PsP in gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaishu Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China; Department of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), 1# Jiazi Road, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China.; Department of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Qihui Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Junyi Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Yin Zheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Siyuan Du
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Meihui Song
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Qian Peng
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Runwei Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), 1# Jiazi Road, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China
| | - Yawei Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), 1# Jiazi Road, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China
| | - Ling Qi
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borba LAB, Passos G, Oliveira I. Liquid biopsy and tumor DNA/RNA detection in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients diagnosed with central nervous system glioma - A review article. Surg Neurol Int 2023; 14:183. [PMID: 37292399 PMCID: PMC10246314 DOI: 10.25259/sni_52_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gliomas are the most common primary malignant neoplasms of the central nervous system and their characteristic genetic heterogeneity implies in a prominent complexity in their management. The definition of the genetic/molecular profile of gliomas is currently essential for the classification of the disease, prognosis, choice of treatment, and it is still dependent on surgical biopsies, which in many cases become unfeasible. Liquid biopsy with detection and analysis of biomarkers such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) from the tumor and circulating in the bloodstream or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to aid in diagnosis, follow-up, and response to treatment of gliomas. Methods Through a systematic search in the PubMed MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, we reviewed the evidence on the use of liquid biopsy to detect tumor DNA/RNA in the CSF of patients diagnosed with central nervous system gliomas. Results After a systematic review applying all inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as a double review by independent authors, 14 studies specifically addressing the detection of tumor DNA/RNA in the CSF of patients diagnosed with central nervous system glioma were selected in the final analysis. Conclusion Sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy in CSF are still very variable depending on factors such as the diagnostic method, collection timing, biomarker (DNA and RNA), tumor type, extension and volume of the tumor, collection method, and contiguity from neoplasm to CSF. Despite the technical limitations that still exist and prevent the routine and validated use of liquid biopsy in CSF, the growing number of studies around the world is increasingly improving this technic, resulting in promising prospects for its use in diagnosis, evolutionary follow-up, and response to the treatment of complex diseases such as central nervous system gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irlon Oliveira
- Corresponding author: Irlon Oliveira, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitário Evangelico de Curitiba, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pingle SC, Lin F, Anekoji MS, Patro CK, Datta S, Jones LD, Kesari S, Ashili S. Exploring the role of cerebrospinal fluid as analyte in neurologic disorders. Future Sci OA 2023; 9:FSO851. [PMID: 37090492 PMCID: PMC10116372 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a clear ultrafiltrate of blood that envelopes and protects the central nervous system while regulating neuronal function through the maintenance of interstitial fluid homeostasis in the brain. Due to its anatomic location and physiological functions, the CSF can provide a reliable source of biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of different neurological diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and primary and secondary brain malignancies. The incorporation of CSF biomarkers into the drug discovery and development can improve the efficiency of drug development and increase the chances of success. This review aims to consolidate the current use of CSF biomarkers in clinical practice and explore future perspectives for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep C Pingle
- CureScience Institute, 5820 Oberlin Drive #202, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Feng Lin
- CureScience Institute, 5820 Oberlin Drive #202, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
- Author for correspondence:
| | - Misa S Anekoji
- CureScience Institute, 5820 Oberlin Drive #202, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - C Pawan K Patro
- CureScience Institute, 5820 Oberlin Drive #202, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Souvik Datta
- Rhenix Lifesciences, 237 Vengal Rao Nagar, Hyderabad, TG, 500038, India
| | - Lawrence D Jones
- CureScience Institute, 5820 Oberlin Drive #202, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Santosh Kesari
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center & Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Shashaanka Ashili
- CureScience Institute, 5820 Oberlin Drive #202, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soffietti R, Bettegowda C, Mellinghoff IK, Warren KE, Ahluwalia MS, De Groot JF, Galanis E, Gilbert MR, Jaeckle KA, Le Rhun E, Rudà R, Seoane J, Thon N, Umemura Y, Weller M, van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM, Wen PY. Liquid biopsy in gliomas: A RANO review and proposals for clinical applications. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:855-871. [PMID: 34999836 PMCID: PMC9159432 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an extensive literature highlighting the utility of blood-based liquid biopsies in several extracranial tumors for diagnosis and monitoring. METHODS The RANO (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) group developed a multidisciplinary international Task Force to review the English literature on liquid biopsy in gliomas focusing on the most frequently used techniques, that is circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles in blood and CSF. RESULTS ctDNA has a higher sensitivity and capacity to represent the spatial and temporal heterogeneity in comparison to circulating tumor cells. Exosomes have the advantages to cross an intact blood-brain barrier and carry also RNA, miRNA, and proteins. Several clinical applications of liquid biopsies are suggested: to establish a diagnosis when tissue is not available, monitor the residual disease after surgery, distinguish progression from pseudoprogression, and predict the outcome. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for standardization of biofluid collection, choice of an analyte, and detection strategies along with rigorous testing in future clinical trials to validate findings and enable entry into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Corresponding Author: Riccardo Soffietti, MD, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy ()
| | | | | | | | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John F De Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kurt A Jaeckle
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto/Treviso Hospital and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Joan Seoane
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ICREA,CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Niklas Thon
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Yoshie Umemura
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
ctDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Brain Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13091989. [PMID: 33919036 PMCID: PMC8122255 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13091989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The correct characterisation of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies is crucial for accurate diagnosis and prognosis and also the identification of actionable genomic alterations that can guide the therapeutic strategy. Surgical biopsies are performed to characterise the tumour; however, these procedures are invasive and are not always feasible for all patients. Moreover, they only provide a static snapshot and can miss tumour heterogeneity. Currently, monitoring of CNS cancer is performed by conventional imaging techniques and, in some cases, cytology analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); however, these techniques have limited sensitivity. To overcome these limitations, a liquid biopsy of the CSF can be used to obtain information about the tumour in a less invasive manner. The CSF is a source of cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), and the analysis of this biomarker can characterise and monitor brain cancer. Recent studies have shown that ctDNA is more abundant in the CSF than plasma for CNS malignancies and that it can be sequenced to reveal tumour heterogeneity and provide diagnostic and prognostic information. Furthermore, analysis of longitudinal samples can aid patient monitoring by detecting residual disease or even tracking tumour evolution at relapse and, therefore, tailoring the therapeutic strategy. In this review, we provide an overview of the potential clinical applications of the analysis of CSF ctDNA and the challenges that need to be overcome in order to translate research findings into a tool for clinical practice.
Collapse
|
6
|
Clinical Experience of Cerebrospinal Fluid-Based Liquid Biopsy Demonstrates Superiority of Cell-Free DNA over Cell Pellet Genomic DNA for Molecular Profiling. J Mol Diagn 2021; 23:742-752. [PMID: 33781965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) offers unique opportunities for genomic profiling of tumors involving the central nervous system but remains uncommonly used in clinical practice. We describe our clinical experience using cfDNA from CSF for routine molecular testing using Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (targeting 468 cancer-related genes). In all, 148 cfDNA samples were assessed, comparing results of cfDNA versus genomic DNA (gDNA; gDNA from cell pellets) derived from the same CSF sample and the primary tumor. Of these, 71.6% (106/148) were successfully sequenced. Somatic alterations (mutations and fusions) were observed in 70.8% (75/106) of the samples; 97.3% (73/75) comprised variants confirming central nervous system involvement by a previously diagnosed tumor, 14.7% (11/75) had additional variants consistent with a therapy-related resistance mechanism, and 2.7% (2/75) had variants that independently diagnosed a new primary. Among samples with paired cfDNA and gDNA sequencing results, cfDNA was more frequently positive for at least one mutation [43.6% (55/126) versus 19.8% (25/126)] and harbored 1.6× more mutations (6.94 versus 4.65; P = 0.005), with higher mean variant allele fractions (41.1% versus 13.0%; P < 0.0001). Among mutation-positive cfDNAs, the corresponding gDNA was frequently negative (44.6%; 25/55) or failed sequencing (17.8%; 9/55). Routine molecular profiling of cfDNA is superior to gDNA from CSF, facilitating the capture of mutations at high variant allele frequency, even in the context of a negative cytology.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumour DNA as a liquid biopsy for central nervous system malignancies. Curr Opin Neurol 2020; 33:736-741. [DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000000869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Bertero L, Siravegna G, Rudà R, Soffietti R, Bardelli A, Cassoni P. Review: Peering through a keyhole: liquid biopsy in primary and metastatic central nervous system tumours. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2019; 45:655-670. [PMID: 30977933 PMCID: PMC6899864 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Tumour molecular profiling by liquid biopsy is being investigated for a wide range of research and clinical purposes. The possibility of repeatedly interrogating the tumour profile using minimally invasive procedures is helping to understand spatial and temporal tumour heterogeneity, and to shed a light on mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies. Moreover, this approach has been already implemented in clinical practice to address specific decisions regarding patients’ follow‐up and therapeutic management. For central nervous system (CNS) tumours, molecular profiling is particularly relevant for the proper characterization of primary neoplasms, while CNS metastases can significantly diverge from primary disease or extra‐CNS metastases, thus compelling a dedicated assessment. Based on these considerations, effective liquid biopsy tools for CNS tumours are highly warranted and a significant amount of data have been accrued over the last few years. These results have shown that liquid biopsy can provide clinically meaningful information about both primary and metastatic CNS tumours, but specific considerations must be taken into account, for example, when choosing the source of liquid biopsy. Nevertheless, this approach is especially attractive for CNS tumours, as repeated tumour sampling is not feasible. The aim of our review was to thoroughly report the state‐of‐the‐art regarding the opportunities and challenges posed by liquid biopsy in both primary and secondary CNS tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - G Siravegna
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo (Turin), Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (Turin), Italy
| | - R Rudà
- Neuro-oncology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Italy.,Neuro-oncology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - R Soffietti
- Neuro-oncology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Italy.,Neuro-oncology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - A Bardelli
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo (Turin), Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (Turin), Italy
| | - P Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising diagnostic marker for many cancers and can be noninvasively assayed from blood. For diagnosing glioma, this approach has unfortunately proven to be of limited use since glioma contribute minimal ctDNA to the blood circulation. A more promising avenue may therefore be to hunt for ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The study by Mouliere et al in this issue of EMBO Molecular Medicine demonstrates that shallow whole‐genome sequencing of CSF‐cfDNA can be used to detect copy number alterations in glioma‐derived ctDNA, providing a low cost strategy to screen for glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philip Burnham
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Iwijn De Vlaminck
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Seoane J, De Mattos-Arruda L, Le Rhun E, Bardelli A, Weller M. Cerebrospinal fluid cell-free tumour DNA as a liquid biopsy for primary brain tumours and central nervous system metastases. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:211-218. [PMID: 30576421 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Challenges in obtaining tissue specimens from patients with brain tumours limit the diagnosis and molecular characterisation and impair the development of better therapeutic approaches. The analysis of cell-free tumour DNA in plasma (considered a liquid biopsy) has facilitated the characterisation of extra-cranial tumours. However, cell-free tumour DNA in plasma is limited in quantity and may not reliably capture the landscape of genomic alterations of brain tumours. Here, we review recent work assessing the relevance of cell-free tumour DNA from cerebrospinal fluid in the characterisation of brain cancer. We focus on the advances in the use of the cerebrospinal fluid as a source of cell-free tumour DNA to facilitate diagnosis, reveal actionable genomic alterations, monitor responses to therapy, and capture tumour heterogeneity in patients with primary brain tumours and brain and leptomeningeal metastases. Profiling cerebrospinal fluid cell-free tumour DNA provides the opportunity to precisely acquire and monitor genomic information in real time and guide precision therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona; CIBERONC, Barcelona; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès.
| | - L De Mattos-Arruda
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona
| | - E Le Rhun
- Lille University, Inserm U1192 PRISM, Villeneuve d'Ascq; Neuro-oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Lille; Neuro-oncology, Breast Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
| | - A Bardelli
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo (TO); Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zorofchian S, Iqbal F, Rao M, Aung PP, Esquenazi Y, Ballester LY. Circulating tumour DNA, microRNA and metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid as biomarkers for central nervous system malignancies. J Clin Pathol 2018; 72:271-280. [DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) malignancies can be difficult to diagnose and many do not respond satisfactorily to existing therapies. Monitoring patients with CNS malignancies for treatment response and tumour recurrence can be challenging because of the difficulty and risks of brain biopsies, and the low specificity and sensitivity of the less invasive methodologies that are currently available. Uncertainty about tumour diagnosis or whether a tumour has responded to treatment or has recurred can cause delays in therapeutic decisions that can impact patient outcome. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop and validate reliable and minimally invasive biomarkers for CNS tumours that can be used alone or in combination with current clinical practices. Blood-based biomarkers can be informative in the diagnosis and monitoring of various types of cancer. However, blood-based biomarkers have proven suboptimal for analysis of CNS tumours. In contrast, circulating biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including circulating tumour DNA, microRNAs and metabolites, hold promise for accurate and minimally invasive assessment of CNS tumours. This review summarises the current understanding of these three types of CSF biomarkers and their potential use in neuro-oncologic clinical practice.
Collapse
|
12
|
Stewart CM, Kothari PD, Mouliere F, Mair R, Somnay S, Benayed R, Zehir A, Weigelt B, Dawson SJ, Arcila ME, Berger MF, Tsui DW. The value of cell-free DNA for molecular pathology. J Pathol 2018; 244:616-627. [PMID: 29380875 DOI: 10.1002/path.5048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, advances in molecular biology and genomics techniques have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The technological advances in tissue profiling have also been applied to the study of cell-free nucleic acids, an area of increasing interest for molecular pathology. Cell-free nucleic acids are released from tumour cells into the surrounding body fluids and can be assayed non-invasively. The repertoire of genomic alterations in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is reflective of both primary tumours and distant metastatic sites, and ctDNA can be sampled multiple times, thereby overcoming the limitations of the analysis of single biopsies. Furthermore, ctDNA can be sampled regularly to monitor response to treatment, to define the evolution of the tumour genome, and to assess the acquisition of resistance and minimal residual disease. Recently, clinical ctDNA assays have been approved for guidance of therapy, which is an exciting first step in translating cell-free nucleic acid research tests into clinical use for oncology. In this review, we discuss the advantages of cell-free nucleic acids as analytes in different body fluids, including blood plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, and their clinical applications in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. We will also discuss practical considerations for clinical deployment, such as preanalytical factors and regulatory requirements. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin M Stewart
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prachi D Kothari
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Research UK Major Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Mair
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Research UK Major Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Saira Somnay
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah-Jane Dawson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dana Wy Tsui
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Verheul C, Kleijn A, Lamfers MLM. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of malignancies located in the central nervous system. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2018; 146:139-169. [PMID: 29110768 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804279-3.00010-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
CNS malignancies include primary tumors that originate within the CNS as well as secondary tumors that develop as a result of metastatic cancer. The delicate nature of the nervous systems makes tumors located in the CNS notoriously difficult to reach, which poses several problems during diagnosis and treatment. CSF can be acquired relatively easy through lumbar puncture and offers an important compartment for analysis of cells and molecules that carry information about the malignant process. Such techniques have opened up a new field of research focused on the identification of specific biomarkers for several types of CNS malignancies, which may help in diagnosis and monitoring of tumor progression or treatment response. Biomarkers are sought in DNA, (micro)RNA, proteins, exosomes and circulating tumor cells in the CSF. Techniques are rapidly progressing to assess these markers with increasing sensitivity and specificity, and correlations with clinical parameters are being investigated. It is expected that these efforts will, in the near future, yield clinically relevant markers that aid in diagnosis, monitoring and (tailored) treatment of patients bearing CNS tumors. This chapter provides a summary of the current state of affairs of the field of biomarkers of different types of CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Verheul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Kleijn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martine L M Lamfers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wan JCM, Massie C, Garcia-Corbacho J, Mouliere F, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Pacey S, Baird R, Rosenfeld N. Liquid biopsies come of age: towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA. Nat Rev Cancer 2017; 17:223-238. [PMID: 28233803 DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2017.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1509] [Impact Index Per Article: 215.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Improvements in genomic and molecular methods are expanding the range of potential applications for circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), both in a research setting and as a 'liquid biopsy' for cancer management. Proof-of-principle studies have demonstrated the translational potential of ctDNA for prognostication, molecular profiling and monitoring. The field is now in an exciting transitional period in which ctDNA analysis is beginning to be applied clinically, although there is still much to learn about the biology of cell-free DNA. This is an opportune time to appraise potential approaches to ctDNA analysis, and to consider their applications in personalized oncology and in cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan C M Wan
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Charles Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Javier Garcia-Corbacho
- Clinical Trials Unit, Clinic Institute of Haematological and Oncological Diseases, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPs, Carrer de Villarroel, 170 Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Box 197, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Simon Pacey
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Box 197, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Richard Baird
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Box 197, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Nitzan Rosenfeld
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pentsova EI, Shah RH, Tang J, Boire A, You D, Briggs S, Omuro A, Lin X, Fleisher M, Grommes C, Panageas KS, Meng F, Selcuklu SD, Ogilvie S, Distefano N, Shagabayeva L, Rosenblum M, DeAngelis LM, Viale A, Mellinghoff IK, Berger MF. Evaluating Cancer of the Central Nervous System Through Next-Generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2404-15. [PMID: 27161972 PMCID: PMC4981784 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.66.6487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer spread to the central nervous system (CNS) often is diagnosed late and is unresponsive to therapy. Mechanisms of tumor dissemination and evolution within the CNS are largely unknown because of limited access to tumor tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS We sequenced 341 cancer-associated genes in cell-free DNA from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained through routine lumbar puncture in 53 patients with suspected or known CNS involvement by cancer. RESULTS We detected high-confidence somatic alterations in 63% (20 of 32) of patients with CNS metastases of solid tumors, 50% (six of 12) of patients with primary brain tumors, and 0% (zero of nine) of patients without CNS involvement by cancer. Several patients with tumor progression in the CNS during therapy with inhibitors of oncogenic kinases harbored mutations in the kinase target or kinase bypass pathways. In patients with glioma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults, examination of cell-free DNA uncovered patterns of tumor evolution, including temozolomide-associated mutations. CONCLUSION The study shows that CSF harbors clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with CNS cancers and should be considered for liquid biopsies to monitor tumor evolution in the CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena I Pentsova
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ronak H Shah
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Jiabin Tang
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Daoqi You
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Samuel Briggs
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Antonio Omuro
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Xuling Lin
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Martin Fleisher
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Christian Grommes
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Fanli Meng
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - S Duygu Selcuklu
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Shahiba Ogilvie
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Natalie Distefano
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Larisa Shagabayeva
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Marc Rosenblum
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Agnes Viale
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| | - Michael F Berger
- Elena I. Pentsova, Ronak H. Shah, Jiabin Tang, Adrienne Boire, Daoqi You, Samuel Briggs, Antonio Omuro, Xuling Lin, Martin Fleisher, Christian Grommes, Katherine S. Panageas, Fanli Meng, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Shahiba Ogilvie, Natalie Distefano, Larisa Shagabayeva, Marc Rosenblum, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Agnes Viale, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, and Michael F. Berger, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; and Michael F. Berger, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pan W, Gu W, Nagpal S, Gephart MH, Quake SR. Brain tumor mutations detected in cerebral spinal fluid. Clin Chem 2015; 61:514-22. [PMID: 25605683 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.235457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detecting tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the blood of brain tumor patients is challenging, presumably owing to the blood-brain barrier. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) may serve as an alternative "liquid biopsy" of brain tumors by enabling measurement of circulating DNA within CSF to characterize tumor-specific mutations. Many aspects about the characteristics and detectability of tumor mutations in CSF remain undetermined. METHODS We used digital PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing to quantify tumor mutations in the cfDNA of CSF and plasma collected from 7 patients with solid brain tumors. Also, we applied cancer panel sequencing to globally characterize the somatic mutation profile from the CSF of 1 patient with suspected leptomeningeal disease. RESULTS We detected tumor mutations in CSF samples from 6 of 7 patients with solid brain tumors. The concentration of the tumor mutant alleles varied widely between patients, from <5 to nearly 3000 copies/mL CSF. We identified 7 somatic mutations from the CSF of a patient with leptomeningeal disease by use of cancer panel sequencing, and the result was concordant with genetic testing on the primary tumor biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Tumor mutations were detectable in cfDNA from the CSF of patients with different primary and metastatic brain tumors. We designed 2 strategies to characterize tumor mutations in CSF for potential clinical diagnosis: the targeted detection of known driver mutations to monitor brain metastasis and the global characterization of genomic aberrations to direct personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Gu
- Department of Bioengineering, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Properties of Extracellular DNA from the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood Plasma during Parkinson’s Disease. Bull Exp Biol Med 2014; 156:826-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s10517-014-2461-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
18
|
Detection of Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma Suspected of Neoplastic Meningitis. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6:1215-20. [DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e318219aaae] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
de Graaf MT, de Jongste AHC, Kraan J, Boonstra JG, Smitt PAES, Gratama JW. Flow cytometric characterization of cerebrospinal fluid cells. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2011; 80:271-81. [DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2011] [Revised: 04/12/2011] [Accepted: 04/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
20
|
Angert RM, Leshane ES, Yarnell RW, Johnson KL, Bianchi DW. Cell-free fetal DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid of women during the peripartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1087-90. [PMID: 15118647 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether cell-free fetal DNA is detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid of women during pregnancy and after delivery. STUDY DESIGN Cerebrospinal fluid was collected from 39 women who underwent an indicated spinal anesthesia procedure. Twenty-six samples were from women who carried at least 1 male fetus, and 13 samples were from women with only a female fetus. DNA was analyzed with the use of real-time polymerase chain reaction for DYS-1 (which represented male fetal DNA) and beta-globin (which represented maternal and fetal DNA). RESULTS beta-Globin DNA was detected in all cerebrospinal samples. DYS-1 gene sequences were detected in 4 cerebrospinal fluid samples from women who had male fetuses (2 samples were from women who underwent cesarean delivery of singleton pregnancies, 1 sample was from a triplet pregnancy, and 1 sample was from a woman after delivery). No male DNA was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of women who carried female fetuses. CONCLUSION Male fetal cells and/or cell-free fetal DNA is detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid of some pregnant women or some women after delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Angert
- Division of Genetics Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
A quick and accurate diagnosis of maladies affecting the central nervous system (CNS) is imperative. Procurement and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are paramount in helping the clinician determine a patient's clinical condition. Various staining methods, measurement of white blood cell counts, glucose and protein levels, recognition of xanthochromia, and microbiologic studies are CSF parameters that are collectively important in the ultimate determination by a clinician of the presence or absence of a catastrophic CNS condition. Many of these CNS parameters have significant limitations that should be recognized to minimize under treating patients with catastrophic illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Jerrard
- Emergency Medical Services, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kopreski MS, Gocke CD. Cellular- versus extracellular-based assays. Comparing utility in DNA and RNA molecular marker assessment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 906:124-8. [PMID: 10818607 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06601.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
23
|
Swinkels DW, de Kok JB, Hanselaar A, Lamers K, Boerman RH. Early Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastasis by PCR Examination of Tumor-derived K-ras DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid. Clin Chem 2000. [DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/46.1.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Rudolf H Boerman
- Neurology, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Glantz LK, Cobb J, Mills P, Lekos A, Walters BC, Recht LD. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with cancer: minimizing false-negative results. Cancer 1998; 82:733-9. [PMID: 9477107 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980215)82:4<733::aid-cncr17>3.0.co;2-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 284] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of malignant cells on cytologic examination of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the diagnostic gold standard for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. The absence of cells is a primary endpoint for most therapeutic trials. Unfortunately, false-negative results are common. Practical strategies are necessary to remedy this problem. METHODS Four physician-dependent variables (CSF sample volume, site of CSF sampling, processing time, and frequency of CSF sampling) were identified, and their contributions to the false-negative rate of CSF cytology were evaluated prospectively in 39 patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Retrospective data were analyzed to estimate the importance of these variables in daily practice. RESULTS False-negative CSF cytology results correlated with small CSF volume (P < 0.001), delayed processing (P < 0.001), not obtaining CSF from a site of symptomatic or radiographically demonstrated disease (P = 0.02), and sampling fewer than two times (P < 0.001). In 1 year, 97% of CSF specimens at the study institution were of inadequate volume; >25% were processed too slowly. CONCLUSIONS False-negative CSF cytology results are common, but can be minimized by: 1) withdrawing at least 10.5 mL of CSF for cytologic analysis; 2) processing the CSF specimen immediately; 3) obtaining CSF from a site of known leptomeningeal disease; and 4) repeating this procedure once if the initial cytology is negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Glantz
- Department of Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rhodes CH, Honsinger C, Porter DM, Sorenson GD. Analysis of the allele-specific PCR method for the detection of neoplastic disease. DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY : THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, PART B 1997; 6:49-57. [PMID: 9028737 DOI: 10.1097/00019606-199702000-00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PCR assays for the presence of mutant K-ras or p53 sequences are potentially useful as sensitive tests for tumor diagnosis. The technical challenge is to design assays sensitive enough to detect a few molecules of mutant DNA yet sufficiently specific that a false positive signal is not produced by a 10(5)- or 10(6)-fold excess of normal DNA. We determined the detection limit of allele-specific PCR (ASA) as a function of the particular mismatch involved using all 12 possible mismatches in two different DNA sequence contexts (K-ras codon 12 and p53 codon 273). Depending on the identity of the mismatch, mismatched template was amplified 10(2)-10(4)-fold less than perfectly matched template. In other words, a mutant allele could be detected by ASA if it represented > 1-0.01% of the total DNA from that locus. Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping was used to improve the K-ras ASA assay. Selective amplification of mutant sequences was achieved using a PNA complementary to the normal sequence to inhibit the amplification of wild-type DNA. PNA clamping followed by ASA resulted in significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity, permitting the detection of tumor DNA diluted with a 300,000-fold excess of normal human DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Rhodes
- Department of Pathology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rhodes CH, Glantz MJ, Glantz L, Lekos A, Sorenson GD, Honsinger C, Levy NB. A comparison of polymerase chain reaction examination of cerebrospinal fluid and conventional cytology in the diagnosis of lymphomatous meningitis. Cancer 1996; 77:543-8. [PMID: 8630963 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960201)77:3<543::aid-cncr17>3.0.co;2-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inherent limitations of conventional cytology often result in a failure to diagnose lymphomatous meningitis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens from patients who actually have the disease. The development of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques for the diagnosis of lymphoma based on the detection of clonal rearrangements of the immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor genes offers an alternative, DNA-based test for the diagnosis of lymphoma in the CSF. METHODS In this retrospective study, 31 CSF specimens from 21 patients were examined by a PCR technique that can detect clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Twenty-four of the specimens came from 14 patients who eventually had definitive histologic or cytologic diagnoses of B-cell lymphoma. The other seven patients had other neurologic diagnoses, including two patients with reactive lymphocytosis, three with glioblastoma, one with metastatic carcinoma, and one with multi-infarct dementia. The results of the PCR examinations were compared with cytologic evaluation of the same CSF specimens. RESULTS Five of seven specimens from patients with central nervous system lymphoma that were suspicious for, but not diagnostic of, lymphoma by conventional cytology were positive by PCR. Of 13 specimens from patients with lymphoma that showed no cytologic evidence of malignancy, 5 were positive by PCR. Two of four specimens for which conventional cytology showed definitive evidence of lymphoma were positive by PCR. Two specimens from patients with a reactive lymphocytosis showed a polyclonal pattern by PCR. Specimens from patients with other neurologic diseases were negative by PCR even when cytologically malignant (glioblastoma) cells were present in the specimen. CONCLUSIONS PCR examination of CSF is practical, complements conventional cytology, and sometimes provides the correct diagnosis when conventional cytology yields only ambiguous results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Rhodes
- Department of Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|