Absence or Presence of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Cervical Conization Specimens: A Clinicopathologic Study of 540 Cases

Reevaluation of negative cervical conizations: Frequency, diagnostic errors, risk factors and management

OBJECTIVE

Cervical conization is an effective treatment for precancerous lesions. However, in cases where no high-grade lesion is identified in the surgical specimen, managing these patients may be challenging due to the absence of established follow-up protocols for negative conizations. This study aimed to assess the negative conization rates at our institution by histopathological review, identify diagnostic errors, possible risk and recurrence factors and propose follow-up strategies for this group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study from January-2010 to December-2020 analyzed patients with negative conization including all surgical techniques and procedure indications. Biopsy and cervical conizations slides were reviewed and patients who kept a negative result underwent deeper levels sectioning of the paraffin blocks with immunohistochemical stains application: p16, Ki-67 and geminin. Data were compared with a control group composed by 29 women with CIN3.

RESULTS

Out of 1022 conizations, 186 were negative (18.1%), with 151 cases selected for the study after excluding 35 patients. Following pathology review, 4 patients were excluded due to false-positive cervical biopsy results, 16 for false-negative conization results and 9 for hidden dysplasia identified after deeper sectioning. The remaining 122 patients were considered truly negative cones (11.9%) and exhibited IHC staining with p16 positive in 20.4% of cases, low Ki-67 expression, and low geminin score in most cases. Specimens with CIN 1 had higher prevalence of p16 staining, Ki-67 expression and geminin score when compared to absence of neoplasia, nevertheless geminin had no statistical difference. Older age, higher parity and IHC pattern with negative p16, low Ki-67 and geminin expressions were identified as risk factors for negative cones (p<0.05). Only 10 patients recurred for high-grade lesions, with no statistically significant risk factors identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The negative conization rate was 11.9%, with diagnostic errors identified across pre-surgical biopsy, cone specimen, and deeper levels. Risk factors included older age, higher parity, low expression of p16, Ki-67 and geminin (p<0.05). Recurrence represented 8.1% of the negative cones, without identification of statistically significant risk factors. Pathological review with deeper level sections and 2-year follow-up are recommended for patients with negative conizations.

Recurrence After Biopsy-Confirmed Cervical High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesion Followed by Negative Conization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study is to assess the recurrence rate (as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ [CIN2+]) in patients who had a confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN2-3) in a cervical biopsy specimen followed by a negative conization specimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Ovid/MEDLINE, Ovid/Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until January 2023. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID number CRD42023393951). The search identified 3,089 articles; 1,530 were removed as duplicates, and 1,559 titles and abstracts were assessed for inclusion. The full text of 26 studies was assessed for eligibility, and finally, 12 studies with 1,036 patients were included. All included studies were retrospective cohort studies. A proportion meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

For patients with negative conization specimens, the recurrence rate as CIN2+ during follow-up was 6% (95% CI, 1.8%-12.1%; I2 = 49.2; p < .0001, 215 patients and 4 studies) in the proportion meta-analysis, ranging from 0.3% to 13.0% for the individual studies. For patients with ≤CIN1 conization specimens, the recurrence rate as CIN2+ during follow-up was 3.6% (95% CI, 1.2%-7%; I2 = 75.1; p < .0001, 991 patients and 10 studies) in the proportion meta-analysis and ranged from 0.6% to 13.0% for the individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence rate as CIN2+ for patients with a confirmed high-grade intraepithelial lesion on a cervical biopsy followed by a negative conization specimen is 6%. In patients with negative and CIN1 conization specimens, the recurrence rate is 3.6%.

Does the New National Cervical Screening Programme Guideline Detect Cases of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions That Previously Would Have Been Missed?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the number of patients undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), for biopsy-confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), where the original cervical screening test (CST) reported oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) and negative liquid-based cytology (LBC). This reflects the number of patients where a LLETZ procedure would not have occurred under the previous guideline.

METHODS

Retrospective observational chart review of all patients (n = 477) who underwent LLETZ procedure in a single tertiary unit over a 36-month period. Prevalence of negative histopathology, positive margins, incidental cervical cancer, and accuracy of HSIL identification at colposcopy were measured. Diagnostic accuracy of HSIL diagnosis from initial colposcopic impression was calculated; factors influencing accuracy were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. There were no comparators.

RESULTS

Of 477 LLETZs, 5.9% (n = 28) were for oncogenic HPV and normal LBC on referral CST. Demographics between the "study" (oncogenic HPV and normal LBC on referral CST) and the "standard" group were similar, except the study group was less likely to be using contraception (25% vs 47%, p = .023). In the study group, initial colposcopic cervical biopsy confirmed HSIL in 91.6% (n = 27) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 3.6% (n = 1). Histopathological analysis of LLETZ specimens confirmed HSIL in 20 patients (71.4%) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 2 (7.1%). No microinvasion was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The renewed National Cervical Screening Programme (NCSP), is detecting more "at risk" patients, predicted to lead to a further reduction in incidence of cervical cancer in adequately screened patients.

Absence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in conization specimens from patients with colposcopic biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Retrospective study of 1695 cases

Few studies have investigated the absence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in excised specimens, and sample sizes of these studies were limited. This study retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics of 1695 patients with CIN 2/3 to determine the incidence rate and relative factors of CIN 1 or less in conization specimens from patients with colposcopic biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3. The study group comprised 430 cases of CIN 1 or less in conization specimens, and the control group comprised 1142 cases with high-grade CIN lesions in conization specimens. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were established to evaluate relative factors. The 1–9 years follow-up data were analyzed to determine the persistence/recurrence rate. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients aged 18–24 years (OR (95% CI) = 2.224 (1.014, 4.877)); with a negative hrHPV test result (OR (95% CI) = 3.210 (1.627, 6.331)); a cytology test result of normal (OR (95% CI) = 5.184 (3.138, 8.563)), ASC-US (OR (95% CI) = 3.420 (2.102, 5.564)), LSIL (OR (95% CI) = 2.588 (1.475, 4.541)), or ASC-H (OR (95% CI) = 2.434 (1.306, 4.539)); an indication of CIN 2 on biopsy (OR (95% CI) = 2.290 (1.694, 3.096)), and no glandular involvement (OR (95% CI) = 1.616 (1.205, 2.169)) were more likely to have an absence of high-grade dysplasia in conization specimens. There was no difference in the persistence/recurrence rate between the two groups (x2 = 1.55, P = 0.46). An age of 18–24 years, a negative hrHPV test result, a non-HSIL cytology test result, an indication of CIN 2 on biopsy, and no glandular involvement were relative factors for an absence of high-grade dysplasia in conization specimens. For patients with relative factors, especially young women, informed follow-up should be considered.

Construction and Evaluation of a Clinical Prediction Scoring System for Positive Cervical Margins Under Colposcopy

Introduction

Currently, the commonly used surgical methods for cervical lesions include loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold knife conization (CKC). However, the positive rate of surgical margins after LEEP is relatively high, which leads to disease recurrence and places further demand on clinical treatment. This study investigated factors related to positive margins after LEEP and established a scoring system to enhance preoperative risk assessment and surgical selection.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 411 patients undergoing LEEP surgery for cervical lesions in the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), from January 2016 to March 2021, was performed. Cases were divided into a negative margin group (349 cases) and a positive margin group according to postoperative pathology. In the positive group (62 cases), single-factor and multi-factor analyses screened influencing factors; a logistic and additive scoring system was established; furthermore, a ROC curve was used to evaluate scoring effectiveness.

Results

The positive rate of resection margins after LEEP was 15.1%. Univariate analysis indicated a relationship to patient age, menopause, preoperative ThinPrep Cytology Test (TCT) results, lesion quadrant number under colposcopy, cervical biopsy, and the result of endocervical curettage (ECC). Multivariate analysis showed that age >35 y, menopause, preoperative TCT being high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), four quadrants being involved under colposcopy, and ECC being HSIL were all independent influencing factors of positive margins after LEEP (P < 0.05). These were included with the above factors to establish a logistic and additive scoring system. When the logistic score was 17, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting positive margins after LEEP were 80.6 and 61.6%, respectively. When the additive score was 6, the sensitivity and specificity were 74.2 and 66.2%, respectively. Both scoring systems had good predictability (area under the curve AUC >0.75).

Conclusions

This study quantified factors influencing positive margins after LEEP and established a scoring system for evaluating patients before surgery to provide a basis for individualized treatment and selection of surgical methods.

Overdiagnosis of HSIL on cervical biopsy: errors in p16 immunohistochemistry implementation

In 2012, the lower anogenital squamous terminology (LAST) project introduced new nomenclature for human papillomavirus-related squamous lesions of the lower genital tract: low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL and HSIL). Biomarker p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also recommended to assist classification: block-like positive staining supports the diagnosis of HSIL. We aim to assess the impact of LAST recommendations on our practice as well as to identify challenges and errors in p16 IHC implementation. We studied 262 cervical biopsies meeting 3 criteria: (1) HSIL diagnosis; (2) p16 IHC performed at time of diagnosis; and (3) patient's follow-up more than 12 months, including cervical cytology, biopsy, and excision. Among these patients, subsequent loop electrosurgical excision procedure and surveillance revealed 163 HSILs (62%), 28 LSILs (11%), and 71 "nondysplastic changes" (27%). We reviewed the latter 2 groups' original hematoxylin and eosin and p16 IHC slides. The diagnosis of HSIL was confirmed in 49 cases (49%), whereas 50 (51%) were reclassified as LSIL (n=46) or negative for dysplasia (n=4). These cases were initially overdiagnosed as HSIL because pathologists (1) overused p16 IHC on unequivocal LSIL (n=27) or (2) upgraded questionable lesions to HSIL based on nonblock p16 staining patterns (patchy or focal, n=23). To implement LAST recommendations successfully, we advocate judicious use of p16 in the designated circumstances and careful interpretation of staining patterns in the context of morphology. A standardized threshold for p16 positivity and supplementary guidance will help clarify the biomarker's utility and will facilitate LAST implementation in routine practice.