Fibromatosis of the Breast: Diagnostic Accuracy of Core Needle Biopsy

Molecular pathology in breast disease: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools

Molecular testing in breast cancer gained increasing attention and importance as specific molecular results can tailor not only oncological decisions on systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant or in metastatic setting, but increasingly serve in diagnostic routine histopathological services to differentiate between morphologically overlapping or ambiguous histological pictures. Diagnostic tools involve in most cases a broad spectrum of immunohistochemical panels, followed by entity-specific in situ hybridization probes and in given cases NGS-based sequencing. Workflow of which methodology is applied and in which order depends on the specific entity resp. on the given differential diagnosis in question. Regarding prognostic/predictive molecular testing, the choice of assay and the workflow are based on clinical algorithms and on the evidence of targeted therapies following the molecular alterations. In this review paper, we aim to address the use of molecular technics in [1] the histological diagnostic setting (such as subtyping of invasive carcinomas/malignant spindle cell tumors and sarcomas and some B3 lesions) and [2] in the context of adjuvant or neoadjuvant or other clinical settings with special focus of targeted therapies.

Mammary Spindle Cell Proliferations on Core Needle Biopsy: Is Excision Always Necessary?

Mammary spindle cell proliferations (SCPs) encompass a wide range of lesions and can be challenging to accurately diagnose on core needle biopsies (CNBs). Most SCPs are excised for definitive diagnosis. In the era of minimally invasive therapy, some SCP may be followed conservatively. We aim to examine the spectrum of SCP diagnosed on CNB and evaluate if excision of benign/indeterminate SCP is always required. We identified patients with SCP across 3 institutions. The CNB were classified into benign, indeterminate, or malignant. Available excisional specimens were used to classify the lesion as benign or malignant. Clinical variables were reviewed. A total of 197 SCP met the inclusion criteria, including 100 (53%) CNB classified as benign, 52 (26%) indeterminate, and 36 (19%) malignant. Nine patients had excisions without a preceding CNB. Excision was performed in 47% of benign, 87% of indeterminate, and 86% malignant CNB. Of 123 excised SCP, 77 (63%) were benign, while 44 (36%) were malignant. Most benign lesions were not suspicious radiologically (67%), while indeterminate and malignant lesions were more likely to be suspicious (44% and 75%, respectively; P <0.001). Malignant lesions tended to present as larger, rapidly growing, masses. Most mammary SCP are benign (63% of excisions). Appropriate ancillary tests can safely exclude some malignant entities. We encourage narrowing down the differential diagnosis to pertinent entities based on clinical presentation, imaging, histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular studies, if applicable. Patients with mammary SCP may be spared surgery provided accurate pathologic diagnosis and appropriate correlation with imaging and clinical data.

Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) is a benign mesenchymal proliferative lesion of the breast. PASH is postulated to be hormonally induced and predominantly occurs in premenopausal women and postmenopausal women on menopausal hormone therapy. Clinical presentation varies from screen-detected lesions to palpable masses. Imaging findings of PASH are nonspecific. The most common mammographic findings are an oval or round circumscribed non-calcified mass or developing asymmetry. On US, PASH is often seen as an oval hypoechoic mass that may be circumscribed and can have an echogenic rim, or, when manifest as mammographic asymmetry, US may show a corresponding non-mass focal area of echogenic tissue. Limited studies have investigated the MRI appearance, with PASH most often manifesting as non-mass enhancement, or, less often, as an oval or irregular mass with persistent kinetics. Histopathologically, PASH can be mistaken for a fibroadenoma or phyllodes tumor and has features overlapping low-grade angiosarcoma. Assessment of radiologic-pathologic concordance is particularly important as PASH is often an incidental finding, adjacent to the targeted lesion at histopathology. Surgical excision or repeat core-needle biopsy is necessary for discordant suspicious cases. After a benign, concordant diagnosis of PASH, the patient may resume routine screening.

Fibromatosis of the breast in a male patient

Fibromatosis of the breast is a rare soft tissue lesion that arises from the mammary tissue or the pectoral fascia. We present a case of fibromatosis in a 39-year-old male patient who developed a right lateral breast mass in several weeks without prior trauma or surgery. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy findings included differential diagnoses of nodular fasciitis and fibromatosis. The patient was referred to a breast surgeon and underwent excisional biopsy. Final pathology report confirmed fibromatosis. The patient tolerated the surgery well and will continue to follow up post-operatively for recurrence.

Breast Fibromatosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Fibromatosis of the breast is a rare, benign locally infiltrative tumor without metastatic potential. Patients typically present with a painless, palpable, firm breast mass, which may be mobile or fixed to the pectoralis muscle. While some cases are related to familial mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, the majority are sporadic due to somatic mutations or prior injury to the breast tissue. On mammography, fibromatosis is typically seen as an irregular, dense, spiculated mass. US demonstrates a hypoechoic, irregular mass with indistinct margins. Fibromatosis is indistinguishable from breast cancer on imaging, and core biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis. Wide local excision is the historical standard for treatment; however, recurrence rates are high, and other emerging therapies are being explored. This article reviews the clinical features, imaging and histopathologic findings, along with brief overview of management.

Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Versus Surgical Resection in Patients With Breast Desmoid Tumor

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that desmoid tumors can be managed more conservatively rather than undergoing wide surgical resection (SR). Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (UGVAB) is a minimally invasive technique. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcome in patients with breast desmoid tumor (BDT) who received UGVAB alone versus SR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pathology database was searched for patients diagnosed with BDT ≤ 3 cm from 2007 to 2019. All patients underwent breast ultrasound examination and were then performed UGVAB alone or local SR. The Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test was used as a univariate analysis to compare the relapse-free survival (RFS) rates between UGVAB and SR groups. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were included. The median follow-up was 41 mo (range, 5-110 mo). The incidence of tumor recurrence was 23.1% (9/39). The 3-y cumulative RFS was 83.1% and 95.8% in the UGVAB and SR group, respectively, which was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.131, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis also revealed that treatment strategy (UGVAB versus SR) was not associated with an increased risk of relapse events (P = 0.274).

CONCLUSIONS

Small desmoid tumors (≤3 cm) after UGVAB alone did not have a significantly compromised RFS compared with those who underwent SR. UGVAB may be an alternative and relatively conservative method for the diagnosis and local control of BDT with a smaller size. A prospective, randomized study with large sample size is needed to confirm this observation.

Lower Rate of CTNNB1 Mutations and Higher Rate of APC Mutations in Desmoid Fibromatosis of the Breast: A Series of 134 Tumors

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a rare, locally aggressive, nonmetastasizing fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor with a tendency to recur and an unpredictable clinical course. A "wait-and-see" policy is the new standard of care. DF are characterized by activating alterations of the wnt/β-catenin pathway: CTNNB1 or adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC) mutations (these mutations being mutually exclusive). Desmoid-type fibromatosis of the breast (DFB) is rare with an incidence of 0.2% of breast tumors. The diagnosis of DFB is difficult, as it must be distinguished from metaplastic carcinoma and other spindle cell lesions. Sequencing of 128 DFB identified a lower rate of CTNNB1 mutations using Sanger (65.6%) or Sanger+next-generation sequencing (77.7%) and a higher rate of APC mutations (11.8%) than in all-site DF. By excluding patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (n=2), the rate of APC mutations in DFB was high (10.7%). The distribution of CTNNB1 mutations in DFB was different from all-site DF, with a higher rate of T41A (68.9%), a lower rate of S45F (5.7%), and a similar rate of S45T (12.6%). By combining the 2 molecular techniques in a 2-step manner (Sanger, then next-generation sequencing), we increased the detection rate of CTNNB1 mutations and lowered the rate of wild-type tumors from 34.4% to 9.8%, therefore improving the diagnosis of DFB. The identification of the exon 3 CTNNB1 mutation in breast spindle cell lesions is a highly specific tool for the diagnosis of DFB, in addition to extensive immunohistochemical analysis. Our study also underlines the importance of APC in DFB tumorigenesis. These findings have significant implications for patient care and management.

Fibromatosis of the breast: a 10-year multi-institutional experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Breast fibromatosis is a rare clinical entity, but poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In light of recent changes in management practices, the aim was to review our institutional experience of breast fibromatosis and provide a review of current available literature on such management.

METHODS

A search of pathological databases within two tertiary institutions for all patients diagnosed with fibromatosis of the breast over a 10-year period (2007-2016) was performed. Clinicopathological characteristics and modes of treatment were recorded for each patient. Concurrently a comprehensive literature search was performed and studies relating to breast fibromatosis and its management were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 42 (range 21-70) and all patients were diagnosed with core biopsy. The most useful imaging modality in diagnosis was ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. 13/16 were treated surgically whilst 3/16 were treated using a watch-and-wait approach. 6/13 (46%) required re-excision of margins and 2/13 (15%) had recurrence after surgery. On review of the literature, there is no dedicated guideline in place for the management of breast fibromatosis. Currently a 'watch and wait' approach is favoured over surgical intervention due to high levels of recurrence and associated surgical morbidity. All cases should be discussed at a sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting and tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered in advanced cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast fibromatosis is rare but affects young patients. Active surveillance is now favoured over surgical resection due to high recurrence rates and extensive morbidity. Dedicated guidelines are required to ensure best outcomes.

Desmoid Type Fibromatosis of the Breast: Ten-Year Institutional Results of Imaging, Histopathology, and Surgery

Background

Desmoid type fibromatoses has proven to be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, as they often appear primarily as a carcinoma of the breast with a high recurrence risk.

Patients

A digital archive search was performed for the period from 2009 to the end of 2018. Inclusion criteria consisted of histological examination of at least the surgical specimen in the reference pathology department and at least a second opinion diagnosis in the reference radiology department.

Results

A total of 14 women and 1 man underwent surgery on desmoid type fibromatosis of the breast. The average patient age was 49 years (range: 22-72 years). The mean tumor size was 2.2 cm (range: 0.8-4.2 cm). The tumor was detectable in mammography in 12 out of 13 patients and in all 15 patients in sonography. MRI was performed preoperatively in 6 patients; in all of the patients, the tumor was visualized with inhomogeneous contrast enhancement. In the imaging procedures, all desmoid type fibromatoses were classified as suspicious. Performing the core biopsy, preoperative histology confirmed desmoid fibromatosis in 12 out of 15 patients. Nuclear stain for ß-catenin was positive in 7 out of 10 patients. Negative staining was found for AE1/A3 in 10 out of 10 and CD34 in 12 out of 12 patients. In all of the patients, a single-stage operation without the detection of border-forming tumor margins was performed. The follow-up interval ranged from 16 to 96 months (mean: 44.86 months, median: 43 months). In this follow-up period, no patient was diagnosed with desmoid tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

In imaging, desmoid type fibromatosis of the breast has typical malignancy-related criteria. Extensive preoperative diagnostics enable the planning of complete primary excision of the lesion and reduce the recurrence risk.

Immunohistochemistry for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a review

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor and main oncologic cause of mortality in women. Although most diagnosis of breast pathology is accomplished using hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, some cases require immunohistochemistry for proper evaluation. We investigated the latter cases including distinctions between ductal and lobular carcinoma, in situ and invasive carcinoma, typical ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ, papillary and spindle cell lesion assessment, metastasis evaluation, and assessment of prognostic and therapy markers. E-cadherin is used to differentiate ductal and lobular carcinoma; 34βE12, CK8, p120 catenin and β-catenin also produce consistent results. Myoepithelial cell (MEC) stains are used to evaluate in situ and invasive carcinoma; calponin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and p63 are sensitive/specific markers. 34βE12 and CK5/6 are positive in ductal hyperplasia, which enables its differentiation from atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. CK 5/6, ER and MEC markers are consistent options for evaluating papillary lesions. Spindle cell lesions can be assessed using β-catenin, SMA, CD34, p63, CKs and hormone receptors. It is important to differentiate primary carcinomas from metastases; the most commonly used markers to identify breast origin include mammaglobin, GCDFP-15, GATA3 and ER, although none of these is completely sensitive or specific. Immunohistochemistry can be used to evaluate central prognostic and predictive factors including molecular subtypes, HER2, hormone receptors, proliferation markers (Ki-67) and lymph-vascular invasion markers including ERG, CD31, CD34, factor VIII and podoplanin. Owing to the complexity of mammary lesions, diagnosis also depends on each particular situation, evaluation of cytological characteristics revealed by immunochemistry and correlation with histological findings.

Spindle Cell Lesions of the Breast on Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: A Miscellany of Masses

A variety of primary breast and metastatic lesions to the breast can present with spindle cell cytomorphology. These lesions may range from benign reactive or inflammatory lesions to high-grade malignancies. Spindle cell lesions of the breast are not often seen on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) but need to be correctly managed when they are encountered. While mesenchymal lesions of the breast have a spindle morphology, lesions derived from the epithelium and myoepithelium can be spindled as well. By assessing if the lesion comprises spindle cells only or if other components such as epithelial cells are apparent and then determining whether the spindle cells appear bland or pleomorphic, together with close clinicoradiologic correlation and prudent use of ancillary tests, a variety of lesions can be diagnosed on FNAB. However, core needle biopsy or excision biopsy may be required in some patients. The cytomorphology, ancillary studies, and clinicoradiologic findings of a range of spindle cell lesions of the breast are further discussed.

Fibromatosis arising from the pectoralis major muscle mimicking breast cancer

Fibromatoses are soft tissue tumors composed of fibroblasts which commonly appear in the muscular aponeurosis of the abdomen. Mammary fibromatoses occur in only 0.2% of breast neoplasms and have been reported in association with prior breast augmentation and Gardner's syndrome. Multiple imaging modalities have been used to characterize the appearance of breast fibromatosis; however, it remains a tissue diagnosis given the variability both within and across modalities. We present the case of a 25-year-old female with a history of palpable breast mass who was evaluated with ultrasound, diagnostic mammography, MRI, and CT. Ultrasound-guided biopsy revealed fibromatosis, and MRI ultimately revealed that the mass was arising from the pectoralis major muscle and extensively involved the chest wall.