Doxorubicin (or epidoxorubicin) combined with ifosfamide in the treatment of adult advanced soft tissue sarcomas

Managing the risk of toxicity in the treatment of elderly patients with soft tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Nearly half of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) occur after the age of 65 years. Treating these patients is a complex issue in the absence of specific guidelines.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review that summarizes current data on the efficacy and the safety of different treatment strategies in this subpopulation.

EXPERT OPINION

Age per se should not be a limiting factor to treatment. Surgery remains the treatment of choice offering the only chance of cure. The potential for benefit from adjuvant therapies must be discussed in the context of expected treatment-related toxicities and impairment of quality of life. Efficacy of systemic treatment in advanced disease did not differ from that in younger patients. However, safety must be considered when selecting treatments. Managing the risk of toxicity requires an assessment of vulnerabilities with validated tools. The Comprehensive geriatric assessment has become increasingly accepted but need to be validated in STS patients. Frailty should not exclude patients from potentially life-saving therapy. The correction of reversible conditions and active supportive care may make the treatment safer. Future studies are warranted to define better the patterns, benefits, risks of existing treatments. New options remain to be identified to reduce toxicity.

Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated with First-Line Chemotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of 12 EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Trials

BACKGROUND

Almost half of patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are older than 65 years; however, the outcomes of elderly patients with metastatic disease are not well described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An elderly cohort of patients aged ≥65 years was extracted from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group database of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS within 12 EORTC clinical trials. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rate (RR).

RESULTS

Of 2,810 participants in EORTC trials, there were 348 elderly patients (12.4%, median 68 years; interquartile range [IQR], 67-70; maximum 84 years) and 2,462 patients aged <65 years (median 49 years; IQR, 39-57). Most elderly patients had a performance status of 0 (n = 134; 39%) or 1 (n = 177; 51%). Leiomyosarcoma (n = 130; 37%) was the most common histological subtype. Lung metastases were present in 181 patients (52%) and liver metastases in 63 patients (18%). Overall, 126 patients (36%) received doxorubicin, 114 patients (33%) doxorubicin + ifosfamide, 43 patients (12%) epirubicin, 39 patients (11%) trabectedin, and 26 patients (7%) ifosfamide. Overall RR was 14.9% (n = 52), median PFS was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-4.3), and median OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.43-11.83). In patients aged <65 years, overall RR was 20.3% (n = 501), median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 11.9-12.9), and median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.9-4.6).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with metastatic STS treated with first-line chemotherapy were largely underrepresented in these EORTC STS trials. Their outcomes were only slightly worse than those of younger patients. Novel trials with broader eligibility criteria are needed for elderly patients. These trials should incorporate geriatric assessments and measurements of age-adjusted health-related quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This analysis demonstrates that elderly patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma are underrepresented in clinical trials of first-line chemotherapy by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Furthermore, the elderly participants were generally of excellent performance status, which is not representative of an unselected elderly population. These data provide rationale for development of novel trials for elderly patients that are not only for "elite" patients but include comprehensive geriatric assessments for risk stratification. Because chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas is largely given with palliative intent, incorporation of health-related quality of life measures with traditional endpoints will provide a more holistic approach to future clinical trials.

Phase IB study of the combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma: the Axtell regimen

BACKGROUND

To assess the response of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) to the combination of docetaxel, bevacizumab, and gemcitabine. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels and expression of VEGF-A and VEGF receptors 1 and 2 were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients with STS were enrolled. A dose-finding study for gemcitabine from 1000, 1250, then 1500 mg/m(2) was done in nine patients (three cohorts), followed by an expansion cohort of 27 patients. Dose of docetaxel was 50 mg/m(2), bevacizumab was 5 mg/kg, and gemcitabine was 1500 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks. Serum VEGF-A was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and tissue VEGF-A and its receptors by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months. The overall response rate observed was 31.4%, with 5 complete and 6 partial responses, and 18 stable diseases lasting for a median of 6 months. There was no significant hematologic toxicity. The adverse events with the highest grade were attributed to bevacizumab. There was no correlation of VEGF pathway biomarkers with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and bevacizumab is safe and effective in patients with STS. The most concerning adverse events were consequences of bevacizumab administration. The benefit of bevacizumab in this patient population remains unclear.

Tumor-targeted drug delivery with aptamers

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death around the world. Tumor-targeted drug delivery is one of the major areas in cancer research. Aptamers exhibit many desirable properties for tumor-targeted drug delivery, such as ease of selection and synthesis, high binding affinity and specificity, low immunogenicity, and versatile synthetic accessibility. Over the last several years, aptamers have quickly become a new class of targeting ligands for drug delivery applications. In this review, we will discuss in detail about aptamer-based delivery of chemotherapy drugs (e.g. doxorubicin, docetaxel, daunorubicin, and cisplatin), toxins (e.g. gelonin and various photodynamic therapy agents), and a variety of small interfering RNAs. Although the results are promising which warrants enthusiasm for aptamer-based drug delivery, tumor homing of aptamer-based conjugates after systemic injection has only been achieved in one report. Much remains to be done before aptamer-based drug delivery can reach clinical trials and eventually the day-to-day management of cancer patients. Therefore, future directions and challenges in aptamer-based drug delivery are also discussed.

Phase II study of sunitinib malate, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with relapsed or refractory soft tissue sarcomas. Focus on three prevalent histologies: leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of histologic subtypes with targetable molecular alterations, often treated as a single disease. Sunitinib malate is a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor active in other solid tumors carrying similar alterations (i.e., imatinib mesylate-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors). This single-institution phase II study investigated the safety and efficacy of sunitinib malate in three common STS subtypes. Patients with documented unresectable or metastatic STS (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma [MFH]), measurable disease, and 3 or less prior lines of therapy were eligible. Treatment consisted of sunitinib malate, 50 mg daily, for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Forty-eight patients were enrolled, and 35% were heavily pretreated (≥ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy). The safety profile resembled previously known sunitinib malate toxicities. Median progression-free and overall survivals for liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and MFH were 3.9 and 18.6, 4.2 and 10.1 and 2.5 and 13.6 months, respectively. The 3-month progression-free rates in the untreated and pretreated (chemotherapy) patients with liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and MFH were 75% and 69.2%, 60%, and 62.5% and 25% and 44.4%, respectively. With the caveats that a minority of patients with potentially indolent or low-grade disease could have been included and the small numbers, a 3-month progression-free rate of >40% suggests activity for sunitinib malate at least in liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas. Thus, we believe that further investigation in these susceptible STS subtypes is warranted.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy for non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a highly heterogeneous group of rare malignant solid tumors. Non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) comprise all STS except rhabdomyosarcoma. In patients with advanced local or metastatic disease, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) applied after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is a planned rescue therapy for HDCT-related severe hematologic toxicity.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of HDCT followed by autologous HSCT for all stages of soft tissue sarcomas in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the electronic databases CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE and EMBASE (February 2010). Online trial registers, congress abstracts and reference lists of reviews were searched and expert panels and authors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Terms representing STS and autologous HSCT were required in the title, abstract or keywords. In studies with aggregated data, participants with NRSTS and autologous HSCT had to constitute at least 80% of the data. Comparative non-randomized studies were included because randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were not expected. Case series and case reports were considered for an additional descriptive analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study data were recorded by two review authors independently. For studies with no comparator group, we synthesised results for studies reporting aggregate data and conducted a pooled analysis of individual participant data using the Kaplan-Meyer method. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies, from 467 full texts articles screened (11.5%), reporting on 177 participants that received HSCT and 69 participants that received standard care. Only one study reported comparative data. In the one comparative study, OS at two years after HSCT was estimated as statistically significantly higher (62.3%) compared with participants that received standard care (23.2%). In a single-arm study, the OS two years after HSCT was reported as 20%. In a pooled analysis of the individual data of 54 participants, OS at two years was estimated as 49% (95% CI 34% to 64%). Data on TRM, secondary neoplasia and severe toxicity grade 3 to 4 after transplantation were sparse. All 54 studies had a high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to a lack of comparative studies, it is unclear whether participants with NRSTS have improved survival from autologous HSCT following HDCT. Owing to this current gap in knowledge, at present HDCT and autologous HSCT for NRSTS should only be used within controlled trials.

Adjuvant epirubicin with or without Ifosfamide for adult soft-tissue sarcoma

This randomized study compared the efficacy of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy on the disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival of patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas. After curative surgery, 43 of the 88 enrolled patients were assigned to surgery with or without radiotherapy and 45 to surgery plus chemotherapy (26 epirubicin, 19 epirubicin + ifosfamide) with or without radiotherapy. The trial closed prematurely because of poor patient accrual. There was a statistical significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival of the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (69%) and that of those treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy (44%) ( p= 0.01). The 5-year survival of the patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy was 72% as against 47% of those treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy ( p= 0.06). The power of the study was 0.65 for both the DFI and overall survival. The results of the study suggest a possible advantage of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma at high risk of relapse.

Dose-intensive first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin and continuous infusion ifosfamide in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a phase II study

This phase II study was designed to verify the activity and safety of an intensive epirubicin/ifosfamide schedule in untreated soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients by using both the agents at the identified maximal tolerated doses. 39 adult patients were treated with epirubicin at 55 mg/m2, on days 1 and 2 (total dose per cycle 110 mg/m2) combined with ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2 days 1-4 (total dose per cycle 10 g/m2), with equidose mesna uroprotection and G-CSF support. Treatment was given on an ambulatory basis, at 3-week intervals. The overall objective response (OR) rate was 59% (95% confidence interval, CI, 43-72%), with 5 complete responses (13%) at 18 partial responses (46%); 12 partial responders were rendered disease-free following surgery. The median survival time was 19 months, being 23 and 13 months, respectively, for responding and non-responding patients. The median time to response was 40 days (range 21-60). Treatment-related toxicity was overall acceptable. The OR of 59% was the highest ever reported in our consecutive studies in advanced STS, confirming that improved therapeutic efficacy can be obtained with intensified regimens in such a disease; both the response duration and survival were also longer. The observed activity proved to be interesting with regard to the high response rate in the lung (86%), as well as the proportion of patients rendered disease-free by early surgery after the achievement of a partial response (55%). Both these findings may be important in the multimodality approach to patients with lesions potentially resectable for cure.

Phase II study of continuous-infusion high-dose ifosfamide in advanced and/or metastatic pretreated soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Ifosfamide has important activity in pretreated soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and recent data support a clinically significant dose-response relationship for this agent. Administration by continuous infusion and hematopoietic support have rendered dose intensification regimens possible by reducing both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. The optimal dose and schedule of ifosfamide when given at high doses remain to be defined. In a previous phase I study, we demonstrated the feasibility of a continuous infusion (c.i.) high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) regimen in the ambulatory setting for patients with advanced solid tumors. The objective of the present phase II study was to assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of such a schedule in patients with advanced pretreated STS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with advanced and/or metastatic STS, all pretreated with an anthracycline with or without standard-dose ifosfamide, were treated. Ifosfamide was given by c.i. at a dose of 3.5 g/m2/day over four consecutive days, with equidose mesna uroprotection over five days. G-CSF was added at a dose of 200 micrograms/m2/day subcutaneously from day 6 to day 12. Cycles were repeated every three weeks in the outpatient setting.

RESULTS

A total of 159 cycles of therapy were given (median 4 per patient, range 3-6). Treatment compliance was generally satisfactory. The major toxicity was hematologic, with six febrile neutropenic episodes requiring hospitalisation and parenteral antibiotics. Acute renal failure occurred in one patient after three cycles of therapy; central nervous system toxicity was mild. An overall response rate of 39% was observed (95% confidence interval, 26% to 55%), with one complete and 14 partial remissions. All but one of the responder patients had previously received standard-dose ifosfamide. The median response duration was nine months (range 5-21+ months), and the overall median survival ranged from 6-30+ months (median 13 months).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose ifosfamide is an active regimen in anthracycline-pretreated STS. Future clinical trials should be aimed at evaluating the impact of different administration schedules on clinical response and outcome. The potential role of HDI as front-line chemotherapy as well as in the adjuvant treatment of STS needs to be investigated in randomized trials.

Randomised study of high-dose epirubicin versus high-dose epirubicin-cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma

A randomised study was started in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas who received either epirubicin 60 mg/m2/24 h (total dose for cycle 180 mg/m2) days 1, 2 and 3, (group A) or epirubicin 60 mg/m2/24 h days 1, 2 and 3 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2/24 h days 2, 3, 4 and 5 (group B). The maximal number of cycles foreseen in both groups was eight. Cardiotoxicity of the regimens was monitored by serial LVEF determinations. 106 patients entered this study, 50 (45 evaluable for activity) randomised to group A, and 56 (54 evaluable for activity) to group B. The groups were well balanced for age, sex, performance status and histological type. In group A, there was 1 complete response (CR) and 12 partial responses (PR), the overall response being 13/45 (29%); in group B, there were 7 CRs and 22 PRs, the overall response being 29/54 (54%). The difference between the overall response was statistically significant (chi 2 = 6.19, P < 0.025). The epirubicin-cisplatin regimen was found to be more toxic for platelets and more emetogenic, but cardiotoxicity, either acute or cumulative, was not found to be a major problem in both groups. However, a complete responder receiving a cumulative epirubicin dose of 1440 mg/m2 died from congestive heart failure after a disease-free interval of 27 months. The high response in group B could be the result of the synergism between high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

A review of 40 patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Extraskeletal osteosarcomas are rare malignancies that account for about 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Few large series have been reported.

METHODS

Clinical records and histologic slides of all patients with extraskeletal osteosarcomas treated at the Mayo Clinic between 1915 and 1988 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 40 patients, most of whom presented in the sixth and seventh decades of life (mean age, 50.7 years). There was a male predominance (male-to-female ratio, 1.9:1). The lower limbs most commonly were involved (68%), usually the thigh and buttock regions. Ninety-three percent of tumors presented as an enlarging soft tissue mass, with a history of trauma in nine patients. In nine patients, the lesions were initially interpreted histologically as benign, most commonly as myositis ossificans. Histologically, all were high grade osteosarcomas. Multiple local recurrences (45%) are a feature of this tumor. All recurrences occurred within 3 years. Distant metastasis (65%) is also common and is usually to the lungs (81%). Radical resections appear to be the best option for local control, with resection of the pulmonary metastasis occasionally producing a cure. By univariate analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the patients with predominantly chondroblastic tumors fared better than those with predominantly osteoblastic tumors (P = 0.03). Analysis of survival differences of the three main subtypes together (osteoblastic, chondroblastic, and fibroblastic) was not significant. A small-sized initial lesion did not equate with better survival. Seventy-three percent died of the disease, with a mean follow-up of 5.9 years.

CONCLUSION

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is a high grade malignant tumor associated with a 5-year survival rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 28%-59%). Local recurrences and distant metastasis are common and usually occur by 3 years after excision. Patients with the chondroblastic subtype survive longer than those with the osteoblastic subtype.

Treatment recommendations for osteosarcoma and adult soft tissue sarcomas

During the past 20 years, dramatic improvements have been obtained in the treatment of localised osteosarcoma of the extremities, both in the rates of disease-free survival and in quality of life. Twenty years ago 80 to 90% of the patients died, in spite of mutilating surgery, but now about 75% survive and avoid the necessity of amputation. This is due to the introduction of very effective combined treatments, mostly also using preoperative chemotherapy. One of the major issues is that of intensive preoperative chemotherapy, which improves both limb salvage and survival. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to obtain good results. When the role of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not accurately defined for soft tissue sarcomas, particular emphasis is given to the staging of the diseases and to the important role of local treatment in the survival of these patients. A combination of radiation therapy and surgery is strongly recommended.