Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial

Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.

Intake and biomarkers of folate and folic acid as determinants of chemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients with colorectal cancer: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapeutic drug showing antitumor activity through inhibition of thymidylate synthase, an enzyme involved in folate metabolism. There are concerns about the high intake of certain vitamins, and specifically folate, during chemotherapy with capecitabine. Whether folate or folic acid, the synthetic variant of the vitamin, impact treatment toxicity remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We studied associations between intake and biomarkers of folate as well as folic acid and toxicities in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine.

METHODS

Within the prospective COLON (Colorectal cancer: Longitudinal, Observational study on Nutritional and lifestyle factors that influence recurrence, survival, and quality of life) cohort, 290 patients with stage II to III CRC receiving capecitabine were identified. Dietary and supplemental intake of folate and folic acid were assessed at diagnosis and during chemotherapy using questionnaires (available for 280 patients). Plasma folate and folic acid levels were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and were available for 212 patients. Toxicities were defined as toxicity-related modifications of treatment, including dose reductions, regimen switches, and early discontinuation. Associations of intake and biomarkers of folate and folic acid with toxicities were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

In total, 153 (53%) patients experienced toxicities leading to modification of capecitabine treatment. Folate intake and plasma folate levels were not associated with risk of toxicities. However, use of folic acid-containing supplements during treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 1.81 and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.85) and presence of folic acid in plasma at diagnosis (HR 2.09, 95% CI: 1.24, 3.52) and during treatment (HR 2.31, 95% CI: 1.29, 4.13) were associated with an increased risk of toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a potential association between folic acid and capecitabine-induced toxicities, providing a rationale to study diet-drug interactions and raise further awareness of the use of dietary supplements during oncological treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL DETAILS

This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03191110.

Commonly prescribed medications associated with alopecia

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of medication-associated alopecia often challenges patients and physicians. While numerous studies on the topic exist, limited information on the strength and magnitude of these studies exists.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the most commonly prescribed medications with high levels of evidence to support associations with alopecia.

METHODS

A list of most commonly prescribed medications was compiled using the "Top 100 Prescriptions, Sales" (Intercontinental Marketing Services) and "Top 200 Names Searched" (RxList.com). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for "generic drug name" AND "alopecia" and "generic drug name" AND "hair loss." Two reviewers independently reviewed articles for drug, study type and level of evidence, and number of alopecia cases.

RESULTS

A total of 192 unique drugs were investigated, with 110 yielding positive search results. Of these, 13 were associated with alopecia in studies with strong levels of evidence (adalimumab, infliximab, budesonide, interferon β-1α, tacrolimus, enoxaparin, zoster vaccine, lamotrigine, docetaxel, capecitabine, erlotinib, imatinib, and bortezomib).

LIMITATIONS

Only full-length articles available in the English language were included. The methodology used relied on lists of drugs based on their sales rather than number of prescriptions, which likely overrepresented expensive drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies with high levels of evidence have been conducted on the topic of medication-associated alopecia. The mechanisms of hair loss must be further identified to provide effective management.

Efficacy of aluminum chloride in severe regorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reactions: a single-arm trial

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, causes a high frequency of hand-foot skin reactions (HFSRs). The present study evaluated the efficacy of topical aluminum chloride, a perspiration suppressant, in reducing the severity of hand-foot skin reactions (HFSRs) caused by regorafenib.

METHODS

The present single-arm study included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving regorafenib. Aluminum chloride ointment was applied topically one week prior to the start of regorafenib treatment, and the observation period was 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of regorafenib-related grade 3 HFSR. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of all grades of HFSR, time to any grade of HFSR, time to improvement from grade 2 or higher to grade 1 or lower, treatment discontinuation rate, treatment interruption rate or dosage reduction due to HFSR, and incidence of adverse effects of aluminum chloride.

RESULTS

In total 28 patients were enrolled, and 27 patients were analyzed. The incidence of grade 3 HFSR was 7.4%, meeting the primary endpoint. The incidence of all grades of HFSR was 66.7%, and the median time to the occurrence of any grade of HFSR was 15 days. No patients discontinued or reduced the regorafenib dosage because of HFSR. The most common reason for the interruption of regorafenib therapy was liver dysfunction in nine patients (33%) and HFSR in three patients (11%). No serious adverse events related to aluminum chloride were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Aluminum chloride ointment, a drug commonly used in routine practice to treat hyperhidrosis, is safe to use, has no serious side effects, and may be effective in reducing the occurrence of severe, regorafenib-related HFSR.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. identifier: jRCTs031180096, Registered on 25/01/2019.

The predictive model for risk of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia based on antineoplastic drugs for solid tumors in eastern China

Chemotherapy-related thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a significant adverse event during chemotherapy, which can lead to reduced relative dose intensity, increased risk of serious bleeding and additional medical expenditure. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram model for prediction of CIT in patients with solid tumor. From Jun 1, 2018 to Sep 9, 2021, a total of 1541 patients who received 5750 cycles of chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors to establish the nomogram model for CIT. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia was 21.03% for patient-based and 10.26% for cycles of chemotherapy. The top five solid tumors with CIT are cervix, gastric, bladder, biliary systemic, and ovarian. The incidence of chemotherapy dose delays in any cycle because of CIT was 5.39%. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor site, treatment line, AST, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine were significantly associated with CIT. Moreover, we established a nomogram model for CIT probability prediction, and the model was well calibrated (Hosme-Lemeshow P = 0.230) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.844 (Sensitivity was 0.625, Specificity was 0.901). We developed a predictive model for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia based on readily available and easily assessable clinical characteristics. The predictive model based on clinical and laboratory indices represents a promising tool in the prediction of CIT, which might complement the clinical management of thrombocytopenia.

Analysis of drug-induced hand-foot syndrome using a spontaneous reporting system database

Purpose

The aim of our study was to assess the clinical features of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) associated with certain systemic chemotherapeutic drugs in a real-world setting using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.

Methods

HFS was defined using the preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. We used several indices, such as the reporting odds ratios (RORs) at 95% confidence interval (CI), the time-to-onset profile of HFS, and cluster analysis.

Results

Of 646,779 reports (submission period: April 2004 to September 2020), 1814 reported HFS events. The RORs (95% CI) for axitinib, capecitabine, lapatinib, regorafenib, sorafenib, and sunitinib were 14.9 (11.1-20.1), 54.6 (49.2-60.6), 130.4 (110.7-153.6), 63.3 (55.2-72.6), 29.0 (25.8-32.7), and 13.9 (11.7-16.5), respectively. The analysis of time-to-onset profiles revealed that the median values (interquartile range: 25.0-75.0%) of drug-induced HFS caused by capecitabine, cisplatin, docetaxel, everolimus, regorafenib, sorafenib, and trastuzumab were 21.0 (13.0-42.0), 15.0 (10.0-82.0), 6.0 (3.0-25.0), 86.5 (67.0-90.5), 9.0 (6.0-14.0), 9.0 (6.0-14.0), and 70.0 (15.0-189.0) days, respectively. The number of clusters was set to 4. Among these, one cluster, which included capecitabine, regorafenib, and lapatinib, exhibited a higher reporting ratio and ROR of drug-induced HFS than other drugs.

Conclusions

The RORs and results of time-to-onset analysis obtained in this study indicated the potential risk of HFS associated with chemotherapeutic drugs. Our results suggest that health care professionals must be aware of the potential onset of drug-induced HFS with docetaxel, regorafenib, and sorafenib for at least 4 weeks; therefore, careful observation is recommended.

Plain Language Summary

Elucidation of the relationship between cancer drugs and risk of hand-foot syndrome: Purpose: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is an adverse effect of some cancer drugs, which is characterized by symptoms such as redness, swelling, blistering, and pain in the area of palms and soles. HFS reduces the quality of life of patients and can sometimes interfere with anticancer treatment plans. It is important to understand the clinical manifestations of HFS and gain knowledge that will allow for early intervention by clinicians.Methods: In this study, we used a large-scale side effect database of real-world cases for a comprehensive investigation of anticancer-drug-induced HFS. The database contained 646,779 adverse event reports from April 2004 to September 2020; among which, we identified 1814 HFS events. Using these data, we could obtain information on the relationship between 19 types of anticancer drugs and HFS, and the onset time of HFS and HFS prognosis related to each anticancer drug. Results: Our results suggest that clinicians should monitor the risk of HFS with docetaxel, regorafenib, and sorafenib for at least the first 4 weeks after drug administration. Conclusion: These findings are crucial for improving the management of the adverse effects caused by anticancer drugs.

Measurement of 5- fluorouracil, capecitabine and its metabolite concentrations in blood using volumetric absorptive microsampling technology and LC-MS/MS

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its oral formulation, capecitabine, are widely used in treating a range of malignancies, either alone or in combination with other antineoplastic drugs. Body surface area-based dosing is used for these agents, despite this approach leading to substantial variability in drug exposure and often resulting in either toxicity or treatment failure. Tailoring therapeutic regimens for individual patients using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been shown to significantly reduce toxicity and improve cancer outcomes. However, for optimum TDM, sample timing is crucial, along with the need for a venepuncture blood sample to obtain the plasma currently used for 5-FU measurement. In addition to complex blood sample handling requirements, large sample volume and frequent sampling required for pharmacokinetic analysis is another barrier to successfully implementing TDM in a healthcare setting. Microsampling is an alternative collection method to venepuncture, which, combined with the now readily available liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology, overcomes the plasma-associated issues. It also has the significant advantage of enabling at home and remote sampling, thus facilitating 5-FU TDM in clinical practice. A LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous measurement of capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and 5-FU using Mitra® microsampling devices for sample collection was developed. A Shimadzu 8060 LC-MS/MS equipped with electrospray ionisation source interface, operated in positive and negative ion modes, with reversed-phase chromatographic separation was employed for sample analysis. Samples were extracted from Mitra® devices using acetonitrile containing stable isotope-labelled internal standards, sonicated, evaporated under vacuum and resuspended in 0.1 % formic acid before injection into the LC-MS/MS. Chromatographic separation was on a Luna Omega Polar C₁₈ (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 µm) column with gradient elution of 0.1 % formic acid in water and acetonitrile. Total run time was 5 min, with the injection volume of 1 µL. The intra and inter-day imprecision ranged from 3.0 to 8.1 and 6.3-13.3 % respectively. Accuracy ranged from 95 -114 % for all analytes. Lower limit of quantification with imprecision of < 19 % and accuracy between 89 and 114 % was 0.05 mg/L for 5-FU and 10 µg/L for other analytes. Assays were linear from 0.05 to 50 mg/L for 5-FU and 10-10,000 µg/L for all other analytes. Analytes were stable on Mitra® devices for up to 9 months at room temperature, 2 years at -30 ℃ and 3 days at 50 ℃. The method was successfully applied for the analysis of samples from patients undergoing cancer treatment with 5-FU and capecitabine. Microsampling using volumetric absorptive microsampling proved to be as reliable as conventional blood collection for 5-FU and capecitabine. This sampling technique may lead to less invasive and better-timed sample collection for TDM, supporting dose optimization strategy.

The Impact of Pelvic Nodal Radiotherapy on Hematologic Toxicity: A Systematic Review with Focus on Leukopenia, Lymphopenia and Future Perspectives in Prostate Cancer Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Hematologic toxicity (HT), particularly leukopenia, is a common side-effect of oncologic treatments for pelvic malignancies. Pelvic nodal radiotherapy (PNRT) has been associated with HT development mainly through incidental bone marrow (BM) irradiation; however, several questions remain about the clinical impact of radiotherapy-related HT. Herein, we perform a systematic review of the available evidence on PNRT and HT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed through EMBASE. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used.

RESULTS

While BM-related dose-volume parameters and BM-sparing techniques have been more thoroughly investigated in pelvic malignancies such as cervical, anal, and rectal cancers, the importance of BM as an organ-at-risk has received less attention in prostate cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We examined the available evidence regarding the impact of PNRT on HT, with a focus on prostate cancer treatment. We suggest that BM should be regarded as an organ-at-risk for patients undergoing PNRT.

Clinical characteristics and survival of colorectal cancer patients in Korea stratified by age

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This nationwide study was undertaken to determine differences in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to age using big data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).

METHODS

The NHIS data including quality assessment of CRC by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in Korea between 2011 and 2014 were analyzed. Based on age, patients were divided into three groups: not-old patients (< 65), young-old patients (65 to 74 years old) and old-old patients (≥ 75 years old).

RESULTS

We included 71,513 CRC patients. The median follow-up duration was 3.2 years (range, 0.003 to 5.5). Male patients constituted 60%. The median age of patients was 65 years (range, 18 to 102). Colon was the cancer site in 59.8% of not-old patients, 62.9% of young-old patients, and 66.1% of old-old patients. Compared to not-old patients, young-old and old-old patients were more likely to be diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma and well/moderate differentiation or adequate differentiation (all p < 0.001). Old patients underwent more emergency operation (p < 0.001) and received less adjuvant therapy in stage I-III (p < 0.001). The probability of 3-year survival of young-old or old-old patients was worse than that for not-old patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 1.64) (HR, 3.19; 95% CI, 3.03 to 3.37).

CONCLUSION

Old patients with CRC show different histology from younger patients. They are more frequently to have colon as primary lesion. They undergo less adjuvant therapy. Further studies and evidence-based guidelines for older patients with CRC are warranted to improve their outcome.

Selection of Oral Therapeutics in China for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Intravenous administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the backbone of treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. The availability of oral capecitabine has improved the tolerability and simplified combination schedules. In addition to capecitabine, several other oral drugs have proven efficacy, particularly in palliative treatment lines. Clinical guidelines describe several available third-line treatment options for metastatic CRC (mCRC), but few insights are provided to guide the selection and sequence. In this review, we describe the available evidence and most recent data concerning oral drugs with proven efficacy in CRC, including antiangiogenetic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs), inhibitors blocking EGFR/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and modified fluoropyrimidine, and share recommendations and insights on selecting third-line oral therapies for mCRC in China. In general, third-line treatment options for mCRC are mainly regorafenib, fruquintinib, and chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction, while FTD/TPI was rarely used in China probably due to poor accessibility. Fruquintinib is preferred in patients with poor performance status (PS), elder age, and severe organ dysfunction, compared to regorafenib. New drugs of clinical trials were more recommended for the patients with BRAF mutant tumor, and those with good previous treatment efficacy tended to be recommended for chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction. The management of mCRC is evolving, and it must be emphasized that the consideration and recommendations presented here reflect current treatment practices in China and thus might change according to new clinical data as well as the availability of new oral drugs.

Performance of capecitabine in novel combination therapies in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers throughout the world, and no definitive cure has ever been found. Perhaps a new insight into the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs could help better treat patients. Targeted therapies have significantly improved the median overall survival of colorectal cancer patients. One of the standard chemotherapy regimens used for colorectal cancer is capecitabine, which is important in monotherapy and combination therapies. Capecitabine, with other chemotherapeutic agents (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, perifosine, 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, aspirin, celecoxib, statins, quinacrine, inositol hexaphosphate and inositol, cystine/theanine, curcumin, and isorhamnetin), and biological ones (antibodies) plays an important role in the inhibition of some signaling pathways, increasing survival, reducing tumor growth and side effects of capecitabine. However, some drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors, are negatively related to capecitabine; therefore, the purpose of this work is to review and discuss the performance of capecitabine combination therapies in colorectal cancer.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: Advances in the folate-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy backbone

Notwithstanding recent treatment advances in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), chemotherapy with a combination of a fluoropyrimidine and a folate agent, often 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, remains the backbone of treatment regimens for the majority of patients with mCRC. This is despite a recent focus on molecular-targeted treatments and patient stratification according to mutational status or expression levels of specific genes. Intracellular folate concentration was discovered to be pivotal in the cytotoxic efficacy of 5-FU, paving the way to the current standard combination therapy approach. Subsequent discovery that systemic chemotherapy agents, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, can further increase the efficacy of 5-FU-based treatments led to the development of several combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI. Subsequent efforts to optimise 5-FU-based treatments have focused on 5-FU analogues, initially capecitabine and the combination drug tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and then TAS-102, which has recently been evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for refractory colorectal cancer. Further approaches taken to improve the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens have focused on optimising the route and dosing schedules and regulating folate metabolism. Pharmacokinetic variability caused by the requirement for metabolic conversion of leucovorin has been central to recent research, and the development of agents such as arfolitixorin which bypass the need for metabolic conversion remains promising for future therapeutic candidates. In this review, we summarise the evidence leading to the current treatment regimens employing 5-FU and leucovorin, focusing on recent approaches taken to optimise and refine treatments to improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

A phase I trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Temsirolimus is an mTOR antagonist with proven anticancer efficacy. Preclinical data suggest greater anticancer effect when mTOR inhibitors are combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy. We performed a Phase I assessment of the combination of temsirolimus and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in an alternating dose escalation of temsirolimus (at 15 or 25 mg IV weekly) and capecitabine (at 750, 1000, and 1250 mg/m² twice daily) in separate Q2-week and Q3-week cohorts. At the recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of temsirolimus and capecitabine (Q2), seven patients were also treated with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m² , day 1) to determine triplet combination safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled and 41 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The most common adverse events (AEs) were mucositis, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hypophosphatemia and anemia. Five patients had DLTs, including hypophosphatemia, mucositis, and thrombocytopenia. The RP2Ds were temsirolimus 25 mg +capecitabine 1000 mg/m² (Q2); and temsirolimus 25 mg +capecitabine 750 mg/m²  (Q3). Of the 38 patients evaluable for response, one had a partial response (PR) and 19 had stable disease (SD). The overall disease control rate was 52%. Five of the 20 patients with SD/PR maintained disease control for >6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of temsirolimus and capecitabine is safe on both a Q2-week and a Q3-week schedule. The combination demonstrated promising evidence of disease control in this highly refractory population and could be considered for testing in disease-specific phase II trials.

Clinical outcomes in elderly rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: impact of tumor regression grade : Tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in elderly rectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and the relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) with clinical outcomes has been evaluated in elderly locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 117 LARC patients treated with conformal RT and concomitant fluoropirimidine-based chemotherapy. A dose of 4500 cGy, on the pelvis, up to 5500 cGy on the tumor was delivered. Multidisciplinary evaluation, including geriatric assessment, was previously performed to identify frail patients unsuitable for combined treatment.

RESULTS

The median age was 75 (range 70-88 years), and 103 (88%) patients had ECOG Performance Status (PS) = 0. All patients except one completed CRT. Ten (8.5%) patients temporarily suspended CRT for acute severe hematologic complication, diarrhea and/or proctitis and hypokalemia. Of the 103 operated patients (88%), a pCR, according to Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) score, was obtained in 28 patients (27.2%), with TRG1-2 rate of 43.7%. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% ± 4.2% and 68.0% ± 5.2%, 72.4% ± 4.5% and 57.8% ± 5.2% for disease-free survival (DFS), and 92.2% ± 2.8% and 89.5% ± 3.9% for loco-regional control. Patients with TRG1-2 had 3- and 5-year OS rates of 84.1% ± 6.6% and 84.1% ± 6.6% compared with 82.8% ± 5.5% and 67.7% ± 7.2% for patients with TRG3-5 (p = 0.012). The 3- and 5-year DFS rates for patients with TRG1-2 were 77.6% ± 7.0% and 74.2% ± 7.5% compared with 70.9% ± 6.3% and 54.7% ± 7.3% for patients with TRG3-5 (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Our results reported good tolerability and clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant CRT, with a benefit in patients ≥ 70 years, confirming the prognostic role of pCR on clinical outcomes.

Clinical impact of baseline renal function on safety and early discontinuation of adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with resected colon cancer: a multicenter post-marketing surveillance study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) is a standard treatment for resected colon cancer; however, in patients with moderate renal impairment, the incidence of CAPOX-related adverse events (AEs) and the rate of early discontinuation are higher than in patients with no or mild renal impairment. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of baseline renal function on the safety and discontinuation of adjuvant CAPOX therapy started with the standard dose of capecitabine in elderly patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

Data from patients aged ≥65 years old who received CAPOX at the standard starting dose as adjuvant therapy for stage II/III colon cancer were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on their renal function: CLcr-H (patients with a creatinine clearance [CLcr] ≥50 ml/min) and CLcr-L (CLcr <50 ml/min), and AEs and discontinuations were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 189 patients were assessed (CLcr-H group = 137 and CLcr-L group = 52). No patients experienced grade 4 AEs. The incidence of grade 3 CAPOX-related AEs was higher in the CLcr-L group (42.3%) than in the CLcr-H group (31.3%). The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment within four cycles due to AEs was also higher in the CLcr-L group (21.1%) than in the CLcr-H group (2.9%). Multivariate analysis identified that CLcr <50 ml/min was the only significant risk factor for CAPOX therapy discontinuation due to AEs (P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the tolerability of adjuvant CAPOX therapy was decreased in elderly patients with impaired renal function.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry number UMIN000016446.

Current Treatment Strategies for Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer

Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States and is expected to rise as the prevalence of colon cancer is increasing with increasing aging population. Though some studies have shown benefits of chemotherapy in the elderly population, however, they are also at risk of drug toxicities. We searched major search engines including PubMed, Medline and EMBASE and reviewed articles published in the last 10 years. Here we present current treatment strategies available for the metastatic colon cancer in elderly patients.

A cross-sectional survey of methods for controling hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine treatment

Medical personnel actively provide patients taking capecitabine with information on the items to prevent and treat hand-foot syndrome (HFS). However, they are typically unable to ascertain the extent of patient compliance with the recommended items. Thus, the aim of the present study was to ascertain the association between patient compliance with preventative measures for HFS and the development of HFS. Subjects included 90 patients who were treated with a drug regimen that included capecitabine. Patients were treated at one of four facilities between July 2015 and January 2017. The main parameters studied were the extent to which items to prevent and treat HFS were (or were not) followed, and the associaiton between this extent and the development of HFS symptoms. A manual prepared by a pharmaceutical company that manufactures capecitabine describes 15 routine items to follow in order to prevent and treat HFS. The two activities patients most often performed were 'applying a moisturizer' (74.1%) and 'keeping one's skin clean (e.g., washing one's hands and feet)' (64.7%). The two activities patients least often performed were 'using sunscreen on exposed areas' (14.1%) and 'using soft insoles' (11.8%). Patients who performed more items to prevent and treat HFS were significantly less likely to develop symptoms of HFS (P=0.022). Based on these findings, it is recommended that medical personnel provide instructions to the patients regarding the specific items necessary to prevent and treat HFS, and to follow-up with the patients regarding their compliance, with an emphasis on the items they are less likely to take and on the instructions to avoid external irritants. Following these guidelines should lead to qualitative improvement in HFS management.

Regorafenib-Induced Hand-Foot Skin Reaction Is More Severe on the Feet Than on the Hands

Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Regorafenib-induced hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common side effect during treatment. The reported frequency of HFSR was 80% (grade 3: 28%) in the Japanese subpopulation in the CORRECT trial; however, more detailed data regarding HFSR in terms of onset and sites of susceptibility are unclear. Additionally, the risk factors for regorafenib-induced severe HFSR are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare HFSR between the hands and feet and identify preexisting risk factors for severe HFSR in Japanese patients receiving regorafenib. We retrospectively examined the onset and severity of HFSR on the hands and feet of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib from May 2013 to October 2015 in the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. In addition, we examined the possible association between preexisting clinical factors and severe HFSR. Our results showed that no significant difference in the incidence of HFSR of any grade was observed between the hands (71%) and feet (74%) (p = 0.63). The incidence of grade 3 HFSR was more frequent on the feet (33%) than on the hands (8%) (p < 0.01). The onset of grade 3 HFSR was earlier on the feet than on the hands (p < 0.001). No preexisting risk factor was identified. Our findings indicate that severe HFSR was more prevalent on the feet than on the hands, suggesting the need for appropriate screening for early detection and treatment of regorafenib-induced HSFR.

Association Between Serum Folate Level and Toxicity of Capecitabine During Treatment for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Folate level was proposed to be a predictor for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. We conducted a prospective study to determine the association between serum and red-cell folate and capecitabine-related toxicity in patients with colorectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included diagnosis of colorectal cancers; eligible patients who were scheduled to undergo capecitabine monotherapy or capecitabine-oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for adjuvant or palliative purposes. Exclusion criteria included concomitant radiotherapy or chemotherapy other than capecitabine or CAPOX and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. Fasting serum and red-cell folate were measured prior to chemotherapy. Capecitabine was administered at 2,500 mg/m² per day (monotherapy) or 2,000 mg/m² per day (CAPOX) for 14 days every 3 weeks. The toxicity of the first four cycles was documented by clinical investigators who were blinded to folate levels.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were recruited, of whom 126 were eligible; 40 patients had capecitabine alone, and 86 patients received CAPOX. The rates of grade 2 and grade 3 toxicity were 63.5% and 14.3%, respectively. Nausea and vomiting were the most common grade ≥2 adverse event (47.7%), followed by hand-foot syndrome (25.4%), diarrhea (23.1%), and neutropenia (22.3%). Combination with oxaliplatin (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; p = .043) and serum folate (OR, 10.33; p = .002) were independent predictors of grade ≥2 toxicity. Red-cell folate was not predictive of toxicity. For every 10 nmol/L increment in serum folate, the risk of grade ≥2 toxicity increased by 9%.

CONCLUSION

Serum folate level, but not red-cell folate, was associated with higher rate of grade ≥2 toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment. Excessive folate intake may be avoided before and during capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This is the first prospective study to evaluate the association between serum folate level and capecitabine-related toxicity in patients with colon cancers. It shows that higher serum folate level is associated with increased risks of moderate to severe toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment. Excessive folate intake should be avoided before and during capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

Effects of Preoperative Radiochemotherapy with Capecitabine for Resectable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Aims and background

Rectal cancer is a common disease of elderly people. However, patients over 70 years of age are often not included in clinical trials. There is a lack of data concerning the use of radiochemotherapy with capecitabine in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of preoperative radiochemotherapy with capecitabine on downstaging and sphincter preservation and to assess treatment compliance and toxicity in elderly patients.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (stage II-III/TNM) aged >70 years received preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily during the whole period of radiotherapy. Two patients who refused surgery after chemoradiation therapy were excluded from the analysis.

Results

Eighty-one percent of patients underwent anterior resection and 18.1% underwent abdominoperineal resection. Overall tumor downstaging, considering both T and N categories, was observed in 18/24 patients (75%). Treatment compliance was good and toxicity rates were similar to those of younger people.

Conclusions

Age is not a contraindication to any therapy and elderly patients who can tolerate radiochemotherapy should be treated like younger patients. Preoperative radiochemotherapy with capecitabine for patients aged >70 years has a good impact on tumor downstaging, increases the feasibility of sphincter-preserving surgery, and is also safe and well tolerated.

Oral versus intravenous fluoropyrimidines for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients prefer oral to intravenous (IV) palliative chemotherapy, provided that oral therapy is not less effective. We compared the efficacy and safety of oral and IV fluoropyrimidines for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of oral and IV fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in patients treated with curative or palliative intent for CRC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 5), along with OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, and Web of Science databases, in June 2016. We also searched five clinical trials registers, several conference proceedings, and reference lists from study reports and systematic reviews. We contacted pharmaceutical companies to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral and IV fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in patients treated with curative or palliative intent for CRC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias independently. We assessed the seven domains in the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool and three additional domains: schedules of outcome assessment and/or follow-up; use of intention-to-treat analysis; and baseline comparability of treatment arms.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs (total of 10,918 participants) that examined treatment with curative intent for CRC with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. We included 35 RCTs (total of 12,592 participants) that examined treatment with palliative intent for inoperable advanced or metastatic CRC with chemotherapy (31 first-line studies, two second-line studies, and two studies of first- or second-line chemotherapy). All studies included male and female participants, and no studies included participants younger than 18 years of age. Patients treated with curative intent for CRC with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy • Disease-free survival (DFS): DFS did not differ between participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.00; seven studies, 8903 participants; moderate-quality evidence).• Overall survival (OS): OS did not differ between participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.00; seven studies, 8902 participants analysed; high-quality evidence).• Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs): Participants treated with oral fluoropyrimidines experienced less grade ≥ 3 neutropenia/granulocytopenia (odds ratio (OR) 0.14, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.16; seven studies, 8087 participants; moderate-quality evidence), stomatitis (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.30; five studies, 4212 participants; low-quality evidence), and any grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90; five studies, 7741 participants; low-quality evidence). There was more grade ≥ 3 hand foot syndrome (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.97 to 7.10; five studies, 5731 participants; low-quality evidence) in patients treated with oral fluoropyrimidines. There were no differences between participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines in occurrence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.25; nine studies, 9551 participants; very low-quality evidence), febrile neutropenia (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.90; four studies, 2925 participants; low-quality evidence), vomiting (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.34; eight studies, 9385 participants; low-quality evidence), nausea (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.51; seven studies, 9233 participants; low-quality evidence), mucositis (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.62; four studies, 2233 participants; very low-quality evidence), and hyperbilirubinaemia (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 5.38; three studies, 2757 participants; very low-quality evidence). Patients treated with palliative intent for inoperable advanced or metastatic CRC with chemotherapy • Progression-free survival (PFS): Overall, PFS was inferior in participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11; 23 studies, 9927 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Whilst PFS was worse in participants treated with oral compared with IV fluoropyrimidines when UFT/Ftorafur or eniluracil with oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was used, PFS did not differ between individuals treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines when capecitabine, doxifluridine, or S-1 was used.• OS: Overall, OS did not differ between participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05; 29 studies, 12,079 participants; high-quality evidence). OS was inferior in participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines when eniluracil with oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was used.• Time to progression (TTP): TTP was inferior in participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14; six studies, 1970 participants; moderate-quality evidence).• Objective response rate (ORR): ORR did not differ between participants treated with oral versus IV fluoropyrimidines (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.06; 32 studies, 11,115 participants; moderate-quality evidence).• Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Participants treated with oral fluoropyrimidines experienced less grade ≥ 3 neutropenia/granulocytopenia (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.18; 29 studies, 11,794 participants; low-quality evidence), febrile neutropenia (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.36; 19 studies, 9407 participants; moderate-quality evidence), stomatitis (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.33; 21 studies, 8718 participants; low-quality evidence), mucositis (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.24; 12 studies, 4962 participants; low-quality evidence), and any grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.94; 14 studies, 5436 participants; low-quality evidence). There was more grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.84; 30 studies, 11,997 participants; low-quality evidence) and hand foot syndrome (OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.84 to 5.43; 18 studies, 6481 participants; moderate-quality evidence) in the oral fluoropyrimidine arm. There were no differences between oral and IV fluoropyrimidine arms in terms of grade ≥ 3 vomiting (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.40; 23 studies, 9528 participants; low-quality evidence), nausea (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.36; 25 studies, 9796 participants; low-quality evidence), and hyperbilirubinaemia (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.64; nine studies, 2699 participants; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Results of this review should provide confidence that treatment for CRC with most of the oral fluoropyrimidines commonly used in current clinical practice is similarly efficacious to treatment with IV fluoropyrimidines. Treatment with eniluracil with oral 5-FU was associated with inferior PFS and OS among participants treated with palliative intent for CRC, and eniluracil is no longer being developed. Oral and IV fluoropyrimidines have different patterns of side effects; future research may focus on determining the basis for these differences.

Bone marrow tolerance during postoperative chemotherapy in colorectal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

This study seeks to quantify and compare bone marrow tolerance during postoperative chemotherapy therapy between rectal cancer vs. colon cancer patients. During rectal cancer treatment, patients receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) irradiation which can exacerbate the hematologic toxicity (HT) via incidental irradiation of the pelvic bone marrow (PBM) during myelosuppressive postoperative chemotherapy. In contrast, colon cancer patients receive the same postoperative myelosuppressive chemotherapy but do not routinely receive preoperative chemoradiation therapy. This comparison will help elucidate the lasting myelosuppressive effects of incidental pelvic bone marrow (PBM) irradiation on rectal cancer patients during neoadjuvant preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

METHODS

Rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative CRT followed by postoperative 5-Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (OxF) chemotherapy (n=35) were compared to colon cancer patients who received only postoperative OxF chemotherapy (n=42). End points were ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicity (HT3) or hematologic event (HE) defined as ≥ grade 2 HT and a dose reduction in OxF. Wilcoxon rank sum test tested continuous variables and Chi-squared test measured differences in categorical variables. HT3 and HE probability during postoperative chemotherapy was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During OxF chemotherapy, 40.0% (n=14) of rectal cancer patients experienced HT3 compared to 26.1% (n=11) of colon cancer patients (P=0.4). HE was experienced by 48% (n=17) of rectal cancer patients compared to 36% (n=15) of colon cancer patients (P=0.36). Rectal cancer patients were likelier to experience HT3 on multivariable cox regression analysis, controlling for several clinical covariates, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.49, [(95% CI: 1.02-6.02), P=0.045] than colon cancer patients. While rectal cancer patients were more likely to experience HE than colon cancer patients on multivariable Cox regression analysis with a HR of 1.8 (95% CI: 0.95-3.75), this only trended in statistical significance, P=0.07.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal cancer patients are more likely than colon cancer patients to experience hematologic toxicities impacting the tolerance of standard of care chemotherapeutics during adjuvant therapy. Focused PBM sparing during radiation therapy for rectal cancer patients may improve tolerance of myelosuppressive chemotherapeutic agents delivered in the postoperative setting.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer Following Complete Resection: A Cancer Care Ontario Systematic Review

The objective of this systematic review was to provide current evidence regarding the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer following curative intent surgery. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and proceedings of American Society for Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology/European Cancer Congress were searched through to August 2015. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) and randomised controlled trials were included. Patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer have an overall survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Combination chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin or capecitabine/oxaliplatin) provides a larger benefit than monotherapy but with additional toxicity. For stage II colon cancer, a clear overall survival benefit has not been shown. However, based on the subgroup analysis available, patients with high-risk stage II disease may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients younger than 70 years of age may derive greater disease-free survival and overall survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (in combination with oxaliplatin) compared with those older than 70 years. Stage II patients with microsatellite instability may have an overall survival detriment if given adjuvant chemotherapy.

The short-term impact of colorectal cancer treatment on physical activity, functional status and quality of life: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Physical activity, functional status and quality of life (QoL) are important determinants of the quality of life (QoL) after colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment; however, little is known on how the treatment impacts these outcomes. Having this understanding could help clinicians develop and implement strategies that would enhance or maintain the QoL of CRC patients.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the impact of curative CRC treatment (surgery with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) on physical activity, functional status and QoL within one year of treatment or diagnosis.

INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Colorectal cancer survivors aged 18 years and over.

TYPES OF INTERVENTIONS

Curative CRC treatment, which was surgery with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.

TYPES OF STUDIES

Pre- and post-observational and experimental studies.

OUTCOMES

Physical activity, ability to perform activities of daily living (functional status) and QoL.

SEARCH STRATEGY

CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, OpenGrey and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were used to obtain published and unpublished studies in English. The date range was the start of indexing to February 2015.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

All studies were assessed independently by two reviewers for relevance, eligibility and methodological quality.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from included papers were extracted using a modified data extraction tool. Data that were presented graphically were extracted using online software.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The differences between postoperative and baseline values were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3.5 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane) calculator and expressed as mean difference and their corresponding 95% confidence interval. Where possible, study results were pooled in statistical meta-analysis. The physical activity, functional status and some QoL results are presented in a narrative and table form.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included in this review: two studies (N = 2019 patients) evaluated physical activity, two studies (N = 6908 patients) assessed functional status and 22 studies (N = 2890 patients) measured QoL. Physical activity was observed to decrease at six months after treatment. The functional status of CRC patients decreased, particularly in the elderly (Summary of findings 1 and 2). As for QoL, only the physical and functional aspects were seen to decline up to six months, but scores almost returned to baseline levels at one year after treatment. The QoL studies that used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 tool were pooled in statistical meta-analysis and summarized in Summary of findings 2. The results must be interpreted carefully due to the heterogeneity of studies and scarcity of recent studies.

CONCLUSION

In spite of the limitations, it is likely that the physical and functional capacity of CRC survivors deteriorates after treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The period between diagnosis and treatment provides an opportunity for clinicians to implement interventions (e.g. exercise interventions) that could enhance or restore the physical and functional capacity of CRC survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

The paucity of studies and heterogeneity need to be addressed. The outcomes for colon and rectal cancer survivors, ostomates and non-ostomates must be analyzed separately.

[Evaluation of the Association of Hand-Foot Syndrome with Anticancer Drugs Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Databases]

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare lists hand-foot syndrome as a serious adverse drug event. Therefore, we evaluated its association with anticancer drug therapy using case reports in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). In addition, we calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of anticancer drugs potentially associated with hand-foot syndrome, and applied the Weibull shape parameter to time-to-event data from JADER. We found that JADER contained 338224 reports from April 2004 to November 2014, while FAERS contained 5821354 reports from January 2004 to June 2014. In JADER, the RORs [95% confidence interval (CI)] of hand-foot syndrome for capecitabine, tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil, fluorouracil, sorafenib, and regorafenib were 63.60 (95%CI, 56.19-71.99), 1.30 (95%CI, 0.89-1.89), 0.48 (95%CI, 0.30-0.77), 26.10 (95%CI, 22.86-29.80), and 133.27 (95%CI, 112.85-157.39), respectively. Adverse event symptoms of hand-foot syndrome were observed with most anticancer drugs, which carry warnings of the propensity to cause these effects in their drug information literature. The time-to-event analysis using the Weibull shape parameter revealed differences in the time-dependency of the adverse events of each drug. Therefore, anticancer drugs should be used carefully in clinical practice, and patients may require careful monitoring for symptoms of hand-foot syndrome.

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stages II and III colon cancer after complete resection: a clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

Updated practice guidelines on adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected colon cancer are lacking. In 2008, Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care developed a guideline on adjuvant therapy for stages ii and iii colon cancer. With newer regimens being assessed in this patient population and older agents being either abandoned because of non-effectiveness or replaced by agents that are more efficacious, a full update of the original guideline was undertaken.

METHODS

Literature searches (January 1987 to August 2015) of medline, embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted; in addition, abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress were reviewed (the latter for January 2007 to August 2015). A practice guideline was drafted that was then scrutinized by internal and external reviewers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline.

RESULTS

Twenty-six unique reports of eighteen randomized controlled trials and thirteen unique reports of twelve meta-analyses or pooled analyses were included in the evidence base. The 5 recommendations developed included 3 for stage ii colon cancer and 2 for stage iii colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with completely resected stage iii colon cancer should be offered adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5fu)-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (based on definitive data for improvements in survival and disease-free survival). Patients with resected stage ii colon cancer without "high-risk" features should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with "high-risk" features, 5fu-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin should be offered, although no clinical trials have been conducted to conclusively demonstrate the same benefits seen in stage iii colon cancer.

Decision-making in geriatric oncology: systemic treatment considerations for older adults with colon cancer

Colon cancer is common and can be considered a disease of older adults with more than half of cases diagnosed in patients aged over 70 years. Decision-making about treatment with chemotherapy for older adults may be complicated by age-related physiological changes, impaired functional status, limited social supports, concerns regarding the occurrence of and ability to tolerate treatment toxicity, and the presence of comorbidities. This is compounded by a lack of high quality evidence guiding cancer treatment decisions for older adults. Areas covered: This narrative review evaluates the evidence for adjuvant and palliative systemic therapy in older adults with colon cancer. The value of an adequate assessment prior to making a treatment decision is addressed, with emphasis on the geriatric assessment. Guidance in making a treatment decision is provided. Expert commentary: Treatment decisions should consider goals of care, a patient's treatment preferences, and weigh up relative benefits and harms.

Is it time to address survivorship in advanced breast cancer? A review article

The outcome of advanced breast cancer has significantly improved over recent decades. As a consequence, the complex needs of patients living with the disease and their care-givers should be addressed not only in terms of supportive and palliative care but also of "survivorship" requirements. The multidisciplinary approach to advanced breast cancer should encompass - early in the history of the disease - not only physical but also functional, social, psychological and spiritual domains. It is important to clearly define the disease context with patients and families ("chronic" preferred to "incurable"), addressing the concept of uncertainty, and tailoring the treatment strategy according to both disease status and individual priorities. Specific psychosocial needs of young and elderly women and male patients - i.e. social security, job flexibility, rehabilitation (including sexuality), home and child care - should be recognized and supported. This review will address the key questions associated with survivorship in this disease context, recognizing the dearth of specific data and the urgent need for targeted clinical research and tailored interventions.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and radical surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: 10-year experiences at a single institution

PURPOSE

Oral capecitabine has demonstrated to be safe and efficient as neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery.

METHODS

From January 2000 to June 2010, 238 patients were treated at our center for locally advanced rectal cancers using conventional NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the factors associated with oncologic outcomes with log rank and Cox regression tests.

RESULTS

The incidence of grade >3 capecitabine-related toxicity was found to be 4.6%. A pathologic complete response was observed in 14.7% of patients. The 5-year overall and 5-year disease-free survival rate, local and systemic recurrence rate were 82.8%, 75.1%, 4.8%, and 20.3%. Abdominoperineal resection and node-positive disease were independent prognostic factors of 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery showed favorable long-term oncologic outcomes with benefits of acceptable toxicity and convenience. We suggest that capecitabine can be one of the favorable therapeutic options for NCRT in rectal cancer.

Intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and grade III-V toxicities among elderly stage III colon cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to provide insight in the use, intensity and toxicity of therapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and capecitabine monotherapy (CapMono) among elderly stage III colon cancer patients treated in everyday clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used. All stage III colon cancer patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed in the southeastern part between 2005 and 2012 and treated with CAPOX or CapMono were included. Differences in completion of all planned cycles, cumulative dosages and toxicity between both regimens were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-three patients received CAPOX and 164 patients received CapMono; 33% (n = 63) of the patients receiving CAPOX completed all planned cycles of both agents, whereas 55% (n = 90) of the patients receiving CapMono completed all planned cycles (P < 0.0001). The median cumulative dosage capecitabine was lower for patients treated with CAPOX (163,744 mg/m(2), interquartile range [IQR] 83,397-202,858 mg/m(2)) than for patients treated with CapMono (189,195 mg/m(2), IQR 111,667-228,125 mg/m(2), P = 0.0003); 54% (n = 105) of the patients treated with CAPOX developed grade III-V toxicity, whereas 38% (n = 63) of the patients treated with CapMono developed grade III-V toxicity (P = 0.0026). After adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics, CapMono was associated with a lower odds of developing grade III-V toxicity than CAPOX (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.89). For patients treated with CAPOX, the most common toxicities were gastrointestinal (29%), haematological (14%), neurological (11%) and other toxicity (13%). For patients treated with CapMono, dermatological (17%), gastrointestinal (13%) and other toxicity (11%) were the most common.

CONCLUSION

CAPOX is associated with significantly more grade III-V toxicities than CapMono, which had a pronounced impact on the cumulative dosage received and completion of all planned cycles. In this light, CapMono seems preferable over CAPOX.

A phase 0 clinical trial of novel candidate extended-release formulations of capecitabine

PURPOSE

To examine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of several candidate extended-release (ER) formulations of capecitabine in patients.

METHODS

In a phase 0 clinical study, PK profiles of several oral candidate ER formulations of capecitabine were compared to the PK profile of capecitabine after administration of the commercially available immediate-release (IR) tablet. A single dose of 1000 mg IR formulation (two 500 mg tablets) was administered on day 1, and a single dose of a 1000 mg candidate ER formulation of capecitabine (two 500 mg tablets) was administered on day 2. Candidate ER formulations of capecitabine differed with regard to the amount of the ER excipient (Kollidon(®) SR) in tablet matrix (0-5 % w/w) and coating (0-12 mg/cm(2)).

RESULTS

PK profiles of nine different candidate ER formulations were examined. The tablet coating seemed the main determinant for ER of capecitabine and tablet integrity. Average (±standard deviation) AUC0-2h, relative to AUC0-2h after oral administration of the IR tablet, were 43.3 % (±34.9 %) and 1.2 % (±1.2 %) for candidate ER formulations coated with 3 and 6 mg/cm(2), respectively. Corresponding AUC0-last were 93.6 % (±40.2 %) and 44.0 % (±5.4 %).

CONCLUSION

Modulation of capecitabine release in patients can be accomplished by varying tablet coating content. Proof of principle was demonstrated for candidate ER formulations with coating content of 3 mg/cm(2).

Long-Term Bone Marrow Suppression During Postoperative Chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To quantify ensuing bone marrow (BM) suppression during postoperative chemotherapy resulting from preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) therapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively evaluated 35 patients treated with preoperative CRT followed by postoperative 5-Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (OxF) chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. The pelvic bone marrow (PBM) was divided into ilium (IBM), lower pelvis (LPBM), and lumbosacrum (LSBM). Dose volume histograms (DVH) measured the mean doses and percentage of BM volume receiving between 5-40 Gy (i.e.: PBM-V5, LPBM-V5). The Wilcoxon signed rank tests evaluated the differences in absolute hematologic nadirs during neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant treatment. Logistic regressions evaluated the association between dosimetric parameters and ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicity (HT3) and hematologic event (HE) defined as ≥ grade 2 HT and a dose reduction in OxF. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine optimal threshold values leading to HT3.

RESULTS

During OxF chemotherapy, 40.0% (n=14) and 48% (n=17) of rectal cancer patients experienced HT3 and HE, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression, increasing pelvic mean dose (PMD) and lower pelvis mean dose (LPMD) along with increasing PBM-V (25-40), LPBM-V25, and LPBM-V40 were significantly associated with HT3 and/or HE during postoperative chemotherapy. Exceeding ≥36.6 Gy to the PMD and ≥32.6 Gy to the LPMD strongly correlated with causing HT3 during postoperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant RT for rectal cancer has lasting effects on the pelvic BM, which are demonstrable during adjuvant OxF. Sparing of the BM during preoperative CRT can aid in reducing significant hematologic adverse events and aid in tolerance of postoperative chemotherapy.

Non-covalent interactions involving halogenated derivatives of capecitabine and thymidylate synthase: a computational approach

Capecitabine, a fluoropyrimidine prodrug, has been a frequently chosen ligand for the last one and half decades to inhibit thymidylate synthase (TYMS) for treatment of colorectal cancer. TYMS is a key enzyme for de novo synthesis of deoxythymidine monophosphate and subsequent synthesis of DNA. Recent years have also seen the trait of modifying ligands using halogens and trifluoromethyl (–CF₃) group to ensure enhanced drug performance. In this study, in silico modification of capecitabine with Cl, Br, I atoms and –CF₃ group has been performed. Density functional theory has been employed to optimize the drug molecules and elucidate their thermodynamic and electrical properties such as Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, electronic energy, dipole moment and frontier orbital features (HOMO–LUMO gap, hardness and softness). Flexible and rigid molecular docking have been implemented between drugs and the receptor TYMS. Both inter- and intra-molecular non-covalent interactions involving the amino acid residues of TYMS and the drug molecules are explored in details. The drugs were superimposed on the resolved crystal structure (at 1.9 Å) of ZD1694/dUMP/TYMS system to shed light on similarity of the binding of capecitabine, and its modifiers, to that of ZD1694. Together, these results may provide more insights prior to synthesizing halogen-directed derivatives of capecitabine for anticancer treatment.

Concomitant Administration of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Capecitabine is Associated With Increased Recurrence Risk in Early Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is used to treat colorectal (CRC) cancer. TRIO-013, a study examining capecitabine/oxaliplatin ± lapatinib in metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer did not show increases in overall survival (OS) with lapatinib. An analysis showed concurrent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage negatively impacted recurrence-free survival (RFS). We retrospectively studied PPI effects on capecitabine efficacy in early stage CRC and how capecitabine adjustments impacted RFS.

METHODS

Early stage CRC patients taking monotherapy capecitabine treated from 2008 to 2012 were reviewed for demographics, medications, toxicities, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 298 identified patients, 25.8% (n = 77) received concurrent PPIs. Five-year RFS was 74% versus 83% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.35; P = .03) in PPI versus non-PPI patients respectively. OS was 81% versus 78%, respectively (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.60-2.14; P = .7). After accounting for gender, stage, age, and performance status, PPI patients tended toward decreased RFS (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.93-2.94; P = .09). Capecitabine dose modifications affected outcomes. Five-year RFS was 84% in the control group, 100% in the treatment-delay group (P = .99), 67% in the dose reduction group (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.23-4.93; P = .01), and 64% in the discontinuation group (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 0.93-5.53; P = .07). Five-year OS was significantly less in the discontinuation group than control group (59% vs. 82%; HR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.44-7.45; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs appear to impact RFS; this may be due to PPIs preventing capecitabine tablet dissolution and absorption. Patients with dose reductions or who stopped treatment had worse outcomes than patients who continued with treatment at starting doses.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence, and approximately 60% of colorectal cancer patients are older than 70, with this incidence likely increasing in the near future. Elderly patients (> 70-75 years of age) are a very heterogeneous group, ranging from the very fit to the very frail. Traditionally, these patients have often been under-treated and recruited less frequently to clinical trials than younger patients, and thus are under-represented in publications about cancer treatment. Recent studies suggest that fit elderly patients can be treated in the same way as their younger counterparts, but the treatment of frail patients with comorbidities is still a matter of controversy. Many factors should be taken into account, including fitness for treatment, the wishes of the patient and family, and quality of life. This review will focus on the existing evidence for surgical, oncologic, and palliative treatment in patients over 70 years old with colorectal cancer. Careful patient assessment is necessary in order to individualize treatment approach, and this should rely on a multidisciplinary process. More well-designed controlled trials are needed in this patient population.

The efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus bevacizumab combination as first-line treatment in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients

AIM

The optimal treatment in older persons with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is complicated by a lack of general agreement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of bevacizumab plus capecitabine combination in elderly mCRC patients who were not suitable for chemotherapy with irinotecan and oxaliplatin-containing regimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy years and older patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30-90 min every 21 days, and capecitabine was prescribed at 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of the same 21-day schedule.

RESULTS

Eighty-two consecutive patients (47 men, 35 women) were included in the study. The mean age was 75.5 (SD 3.9, range 70-87). Half of the patients were older than 75 years. There were 55 patients (67.1 %) with a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS: 0-1) and the remaining 27 patients (32.9 %) had a poor ECOG performance status (PS: 2). With a median follow-up period of 18.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months (95 % CI, 7.8-12.1) and the median OS was 25 months (95 % CI, 18.6-31.3). The main toxicities recorded were non-hematological. Thirty-one patients (37 %) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events, the most common being hand-foot syndrome (9.8 %). No fatal toxicity resulting from this regimen was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the toxicity profile and survival outcomes, the combination regimen of capecitabine and bevacizumab is a potentially feasible treatment option in elderly mCRC patients.

Risk Factors Exacerbating Hand-Foot Skin Reaction Induced by Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin with or without Bevacizumab Therapy

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) ± bevacizumab therapy is associated with a high incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), hindering treatment. However, timing of onset and risk factors remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the development of HFSR and risk factors for its exacerbation to a serious condition in CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with colorectal cancer receiving CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy between October 1, 2009, and March 31, 2012. The observation period was defined as lasting until completion of 8 cycles. The relationship between cumulative dose of capecitabine and cumulative proportion of patients developing HFSR was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Risk factors for exacerbation of HFSR to a serious condition were assessed by multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Data for 203 patients were analyzed. For patients treated at cumulative capecitabine doses of 100 000 mg/m(2) and 200 000 mg/m(2), Grade 1 HFSR occurred in ≥80% and ≥90%, respectively, and moderate-to-severe HFSR (Grade 2+) occurred in ≥10% and ≥20%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations with diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 4.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-12.34; P = 0.001), concomitant use of bevacizumab (OR = 6.01; 95% CI = 2.20-16.41; P = 0.001), history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.10-5.33; P = 0.027), and early onset (within 21 days) of Grade 1 HFSR (OR = 3.78; 95% CI = 1.64-8.70; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HFSR in CapeOx therapy is a cumulative toxicity and risk of exacerbation to a serious condition increases with diabetes, concomitant use of bevacizumab, history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration, and onset of Grade 1 HFSR within 21 days.

Observational study of adjuvant therapy with capecitabine in colon cancer

OBJECTIVE

This observational study was conducted to document the safety of capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy in patients with resected colon cancer under routine clinical conditions.

RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS

ML20431 was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study. It was designed to answer five research questions relating to safety, dosage and administration, and discontinuation from capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy. Patients were required to have R0 resected stage III colon cancer and have started treatment with capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy based on a decision by the investigator. Patients were followed over an observation period of ≤6 months after initiation of therapy. Investigators were required to complete the study case report form at study entry, each treatment cycle, and at the final examination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A total of 1485 patients were included in the study, and 1481 patients were treated with capecitabine and formed the analysis population. Most patients had colon cancer (78.3%), followed by rectal cancer (16.4%). Most patients had stage III disease (69.3%); the remaining patients had stage II disease (30.7%). The most common all-grade adverse reactions were hand-foot syndrome (46.9%), diarrhea (34.4%), and hemoglobin decreases (31.5%). Grade 3/4 adverse reactions were infrequent (<4%). Serious adverse events were reported in 96 patients (6.5%). Six or more cycles of treatment were completed by 77.9% of patients. Approximately two-thirds of patients (67.3%) received capecitabine monotherapy and the remainder (32.7%) received capecitabine in combination with ≥1 drugs, most commonly oxaliplatin (460 cases). Discontinuation of capecitabine was documented in 344 patients (23.2%).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

no efficacy data were collected; the questionnaires for patients' expectations and satisfaction were not formally validated; and a few patients (<1.5%) had some retrospective data.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy in a broad patient population with colon cancer is similar to that previously documented in phase III clinical trials.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Prophylactic Effect of Urea-Based Cream on Sorafenib-Associated Hand-Foot Skin Reactions in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To assess whether urea-based cream (UBC) has prophylactic benefits on sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

In this randomized, open-label trial, 871 patients with advanced HCC throughout China were treated with 10% UBC three times per day plus best supportive care (BSC; n = 439) or BSC alone excluding all creams (n = 432), starting on day 1 of sorafenib treatment, for up to 12 weeks. HFSR was assessed every 2 weeks and at 14 weeks for patients completing the study. Once HFSR occurred, patients were allowed any cream, including a UBC.

Results

The 12-week incidence of any grade HFSR was significantly lower in the UBC group versus the BSC-alone group (56.0% v 73.6%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.457; 95% CI, 0.344 to 0.608; P < .001), as was the incidence of grade ≥ 2 HFSR (20.7% v 29.2%, respectively; OR, 0.635; 95% CI, 0.466 to 0.866; P = .004). Median time to first occurrence of HFSR was significantly longer in the UBC group than the BSC-alone group (84 v 34 days, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.658; 95% CI, 0.541 to 0.799; P < .001). Elevated AST was associated with increased risk of HFSR but did not alter the treatment effect of UBC. UBC plus BSC, compared with BSC alone, did not affect the sorafenib dose reduction or interruption rate (9.1% v 11.8%, respectively; P = .1937), response rate (11.1% v 10.1%, respectively; P = .6674), or disease control rate (98.8% v 98.2%, respectively; P = .5350) at week 12.

Conclusion

UBC prophylaxis in patients with advanced HCC starting sorafenib reduced HFSR rates, extended the time to first occurrence of HFSR, and improved patient quality of life compared with BSC. Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to determine the role of UBC on the incidence and severity of HFSR are warranted.