A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in esophageal cancer

Synthesis of Amphiphilic Amino Poly-Amido-Saccharide and Poly(lactic) Acid Block Copolymers and Fabrication of Paclitaxel-Loaded Mucoadhesive Nanoparticles

Drug delivery to the esophagus through systemic administration remains challenging, as minimal drug reaches the desired target. Local delivery offers the potential for improved efficacy while minimizing off-target toxicities but necessitates bioadhesive properties for mucosal delivery. Herein, we describe the synthesis of two new mucoadhesive amphiphilic copolymers prepared by sequential ring-opening copolymerization or postpolymerization click conjugation. Both strategies yield block copolymers containing a hydrophilic amine-functionalized poly-amido-saccharide and either a hydrophobic alkyl derivatized poly-amido-saccharide or poly(lactic acid), respectively. The latter resulting copolymers readily self-assemble into spherical, ≈200 nm diameter, positively charged mucoadhesive nanoparticles. The NPs entrap ultrahigh levels of paclitaxel via encapsulation of free paclitaxel and paclitaxel conjugated to a biodegradable, biocompatible poly(1,2-glycerol carbonate). Paclitaxel-loaded NPs rapidly enter cells, release paclitaxel, are cytotoxic to esophageal OE33 and OE19 tumor cells in vitro, and, importantly, demonstrate improved mucoadhesion compared to conventional poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic acid) nanoparticles to ex vivo esophageal tissue.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a public health concern with a high mortality and disease burden worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant histological subtype of EC that has unique etiology, molecular profiles, and clinicopathological features. Although systemic chemotherapy, including cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients, the clinical benefits are limited with poor prognosis. Personalized molecular-targeted therapies have been hampered due to the lack of robust treatment efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the molecular profiles of ESCC based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses, highlighting potent therapeutic targets for establishing future precision medicine for ESCC patients, with the most recent results of clinical trials.

Development of chemotherapeutics for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has gradually improved due to efforts for the development of systemic chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Chemotherapeutic agents such as cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, sometimes used with irradiation, lead in the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC. Here, we review the latest treatment strategies for unresectable advanced ESCC and discuss future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapeutic agents will be part of the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC in the near future. However, definitive predictive biomarkers to determine good patient candidates remain unclear for immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. Further research is warranted to identify those biomarkers working individually and in combination. Moreover, genome-based therapeutics enable individualized and patient-specific treatment. The development of molecular-targeted drugs against actionable or druggable genes is in progress.

Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Esophageal Cancer in a Community Hospital in Brazil

PURPOSE

Despite epidemiologic and molecular differences between esophageal and stomach cancers, most published studies have included patients with either disease in a metastatic scenario. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer in the community setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with synchronous metastatic esophageal cancer treated at a public hospital between 2008 and 2016. Patients were grouped according to a prescribed chemotherapy protocol: platinum and taxane (group A); platinum and irinotecan (group B); platinum and fluoropyrimidine (group C); and without platinum (group D).

RESULTS

Of the 1,789 patients with esophageal cancer treated, we included 397 with metastatic disease at presentation. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most frequent histology (78.8%). Median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI, 6.15 to 7.85 months). Chemotherapy was administered to 285 patients, who reached a median OS of 9.0 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 9.9 months); for 112 patients who did not receive treatment, median OS was 3 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.7 months; P < .001). The most used combination was platinum plus irinotecan (A; 55.5%). Disease control with in groups A, B, C, and D was 39.2%, 30.1%, 53% and 14.3%, respectively. Patients in group C reached a median OS of 17 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 20.8 months; P = .034). No differences were observed in median OS obtained with other protocols (9 months). The toxicity profile was different according to chemotherapy, with more severe events (hematologic, diarrhea, and number of days hospitalized) occurring in group B.

CONCLUSION

Platinum plus paclitaxel or platinum plus irinotecan provided similar OS in community patients, although patients receiving irinotecan experienced more severe events. In the adenocarcinoma population, a fluoropyrimidine plus platinum–based regimen, although less frequently used, had a more favorable toxicity profile, with superior median OS and disease control.

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: chemotherapy, molecular-targeting therapy and immunotherapy

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) mainly consists of cytotoxic agents, aiming to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil have been considered standard treatment for several decades. Efforts to develop more effective treatment have led to clinical trials testing triplet, irinotecan-based, oxaliplatin-based and paclitaxel-based regimens. Molecular-targeting agents, mainly anti-EGFR inhibitors including gefitinib, panitumumab and nimotuzumab, have been investigated; however, no molecular-targeting agents demonstrate the clinical utility in Phase 3 trials so far. Negative results from Phase 3 trials testing gefitinib and panitumumab suggest the importance of identifying predictive biomarkers of responses to molecular-targeting agents. On the basis of results from Phase 3 trials testing PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are anticipated to be the standard treatment for patients with ESCC. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition and immunotherapy in combination with cytotoxic agents are under study. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies provide comprehensive catalogues of genetic alterations in ESCC which may lead to therapeutic breakthroughs in a personalized manner. Here, we review the existing clinical data and discuss future perspectives with a focus on the systemic treatment of advanced ESCC.

Long-term survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a cohort study

Purpose

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) is not well established.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 228 patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2007 through December 2016. The probabilities of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by means of the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared with the use of the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of DFS and OS were performed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Propensity score matching analysis was performed for further analysis regarding the benefit of adjuvant therapy.

Results

The pathological complete response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was achieved in 13 of 228 patients (5.7%). With a median follow-up of 59.6 months, the median DFS and OS were 35.4 and 45.4 months, respectively. The multivariate Cox model determined chemotherapy regimens (P=0.003) and ypT category (P=0.006) were significant independent predictors of DFS; and chemotherapy regimens (P=0.001), ypT category (P<0.001), and ypN category (P=0.013) were significant independent predictors of OS. Furthermore, patients who received adjuvant therapy seemed to be associated with poorer survival (both DFS and OS) compared with those who did not in full cohort (P=0.001 and P=0.184, respectively) and matched cohort (P=0.251 and P=0.374, respectively).

Conclusion

Surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applicable. Chemotherapy regimens and ypT category were significant independent predictors of both DFS and OS and ypN category was also a significant independent predictor of OS. However, these patients did not seem to benefit from subsequent adjuvant therapy. The necessity of adjuvant therapy requires further investigation.

Pharmacotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer: where do we need to improve?

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer is a heterogeneous cancer comprised of differing cells of origin, molecular changes, and immune microenvironments. To date, most advances have been made in chemotherapy regimens where a one-size-fits-all approach is used. As a result, there remains a lack of tailored treatment options for such a heterogeneous cancer. This paper highlights the current standard of care treatment options as well as active areas of clinical research.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the key trials that have led to current standard of care treatment including pivotal chemotherapy and targeted therapy trials. The authors then discuss the current approved uses and future directions for immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Current treatment options lack tailored treatment strategies based on the tumor's biology. To date, approved targeted approaches only include HER2-directed and anti-VEGFR2 therapies. Furthermore, while immunotherapy treatment response is often durable, few clear predictive biomarkers for response have been identified. Future research should focus on characterizing additional molecular targets for therapeutic intervention and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy, as well as combination approaches of immunotherapy with other therapeutic modalities to increase response rate. Ultimately, the field should strive to develop personalized treatment options based on a tumor's molecular profile, microenvironment, and neo-antigen expression.

Single-cell Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Molecular Signals to Intrinsic and Acquired Paclitaxel Resistance in Esophageal Squamous Cancer Cells

Paclitaxel is widely used in the combination chemotherapy for many cancers including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the paclitaxel resistance occurs frequently in treating ESCC and the mechanism is not fully understood yet. The heterogeneity of gene expression within the drug-resistant cancer cells may be one of the major factors contributing to its resistance. In the present study, we successfully induced paclitaxel resistance in ESCC cell line KYSE-30 through low dose and long-term treatment of paclitaxel. Gene expression profiles were measured utilizing population RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). 37 single cells from KYSE-30 cells and 73 single cells from paclitaxel resistant KYSE-30 cells (Taxol-R) were subjected to scRNA-seq. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of scRNA-seq data revealed two major subpopulations in both KYSE-30 and Taxol-R cancer cells. Two subpopulations based on the KRT19 expression levels in KYSE-30 cells exhibited different paclitaxel sensitivity, suggesting the existence of an intrinsic paclitaxel resistance in KYSE-30 cells. In addition, the Taxol-R cells that acquired the resistance to paclitaxel through induction were characterized with higher expressions of proteasomes but a lower expression of HIF-1 signaling genes. Furthermore, we showed that carfilzomib (CFZ), a proteasome inhibitor, could attenuate the paclitaxel resistance in Taxol-R cancer cells through activating the HIF-1 signaling. Our new finding may pave a way leading to an improvement in the treatment on cancers including ESCC by combining CFZ with paclitaxel as a novel approach for cancer therapy.

A phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with a weekly paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil regimen to treat patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was performed to investigate the safety and efficacy of weekly doses of combined paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with concurrent radiation therapy, followed by 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy to treat patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria included local, advanced, newly diagnosed and postoperative local regional lymph node metastasis; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of ≤ 2; and adequate organ function. Patients received chemoradiotherapy consisting of radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 Fx or 61.2 Gy/34 Fx) and concurrent paclitaxel (50 mg/m²) and 5-FU (300 mg/m²) for 96 h on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. The two-cycle consolidation chemotherapy protocol included paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) plus continuously infused 5-FU (1800 mg/m²) for 72 h administered on days 57 and 85, after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Between February 2012 and August 2013, 53 patients with oesophageal carcinoma were enrolled in the study. Among these patients, 33 (62.2%) were newly diagnosed and 20 (37.7%) had postoperative local regional lymph node metastasis. The median overall survival (OS) time was 17.9 months (95% CIs = 11.9-23.9), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 12.4 months (95% CIs = 8.6-16.1). Approximately 84.9% (45/53) and 50.9% (27/53) of the patients completed ≥ 5 cycles and all 7 cycles of chemotherapy, respectively. Approximately 86.7% (46/53) of patients completed radiation therapy. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 66.0%, 37.7%, and 35.8%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 76.9%, 66.4%, and 66.4%, respectively. Seventeen patients (32%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity during chemoradiotherapy included neutropaenia (7.5%), thrombocytopaenia (1.8%), fatigue (7.5%), anaemia (1.8%), dermatitis radiation (1.8%), pneumonitis (5.6%), oesophagitis (9.4%) and vomiting (3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly doses of paclitaxel and 5-FU was well tolerated and produced comparable results among patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. A randomised phase III trial (NCT01591135) comparing paclitaxel plus 5-FU with cisplatin plus 5-FU is on-going at our hospital.

A novel intraperitoneal metastatic xenograft mouse model for survival outcome assessment of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has become the dominant type of esophageal cancer in United States. The 5-year survival rate of EAC is below 20% and most patients present with locally advanced or widespread metastatic disease, where current treatment is largely ineffective. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Improvement of EAC patient outcome requires well-characterized animal models in which to evaluate novel therapeutics. In this study we aimed to establish a peritoneal dissemination xenograft mouse model of EAC that would support survival outcome analyses. To find the best candidate cell line from 7 human EAC cell lines of different origin named ESO26, OE33, ESO51, SK-GT-2, OE19, OACM5.1C and Flo-1 were injected intraperitoneally/subcutaneously into SCID mice. The peritoneal/xenograft tumor formation and mouse survival were compared among different groups. All cell lines injected subcutaneously formed tumors within 3 months at variable rates. All cell lines except OACM5.1C formed intraperitoneal tumors within 3 months at variable rates. Median animal survival with peritoneal dissemination was 108 days for ESO26 cells (5X10⁶), 65 days for OE33 cells (5X10⁶), 88 days for ESO51 cells (5X10⁶), 76 days for SK-GT-2 cells (5X10⁶), 55 days for OE19 cells (5X10⁶), 45 days for OE19 cells (10X10⁶) and 82 days for Flo-1 cells (5X10⁶). Interestingly, only in the OE19 model all mice (7/7 for 5X10⁶ and 5/5 for10X10⁶) developed bloody ascites with liver metastasis after intraperitoneal injection. The median survival time of these animals was the shortest (45 days for 10X10⁶ cells). In addition, median survival was significantly increased after paclitaxel treatment compared with the control group (57 days versus 45 days, p = 0.0034) along with a significant decrease of the relative subcutaneous tumor volume (p = 0.00011). Thus peritoneal dissemination mouse xenograft model for survival outcome assessment after intraperitoneal injection of OE19 cells will be very useful for the evaluation of cancer therapeutics.

Nimotuzumab Combined with Chemotherapy is a Promising Treatment for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

Background

Nimotuzumab is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody which has been widely used in cancer treatment. However, the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer patients remain unclear.

Material/Methods

To address this open question, we collected a total data of 21 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer between 2012 and 2016 in a, retrospective study. The patient characteristics, efficacy safety, and toxicity were evaluated in our study.

Results

We observed 1 (4.8%) patient with complete response, 7 (33.3%) patients with partial response, 9 (42.9%) patients with stable response and 4 (19%) patients with progression response. The objective response rate was 38.1% and disease control rate was 81%. The mean progression-free-survival was 7 months and the 18-month overall survival (OS) was 10%. The incidence rate of anemia and leukopenia was 71.4% and 81%, respectively. Two patients showed the serious adverse event of myelosuppression, with nausea, fatigue, and anorexia. No long-term drug-related toxicity was observed during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy can achieve promising clinical outcomes in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, without accumulation of toxicity and was well-tolerated.

A Retrospective Comparison of Taxane and Fluorouracil-based Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Inoperable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: To retrospectively compare taxane-based with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy in terms of toxicity profiles, efficacy and survival in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer.

Methods and Materials: We analyzed retrospectively 179 consecutive patients who were unresectable or medically unfit for surgery between March 2009 and November 2014. Eight-three patients were included in the taxane group and 96 cases were in the fluorouracil group.

Results: The overall response rate (ORR) in the taxane group was higher than fluorouracil group, but was not significantly different (71.6% vs. 63.5%, respectively, P=0.255). In total, 53.0% (44/83) of the patients in the taxane group had progressive disease versus 54.2% (52/96) in the fluorouracil group (not significantly different (P=0.758)). There was no significant difference in overall response rate, progression free survival and overall survival, as well as treatment-related death. In terms of non-hematological toxicity, patients in the taxane group experienced a lower incidence of ≥ grade 3 esophageal perforation or fistula (4.8% vs. 13.5%, P=0.047) and pneumonia (4.8% vs. 9.7%, P=0.242). Regarding hematological toxicity, thrombocytopenia in the taxane group was significantly lower (4.8% vs. 13.5%, P=0.047), but there was a trend towards a higher rate of ≥ grade 3 leukopenia (34.9% vs.26.0%, P=0.196).

Conclusions: Chemoradiation with taxane-based regimens is well tolerated, with potentially promising efficacy, and could become a good alternative treatment in a first line setting for patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiation: an effective approach for palliation in esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Palliation of dysphagia is a challenge in advanced esophageal cancer. The addition of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) has shown significant improvement in dysphagia relief and symptom scores. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined use of ILBT and EBRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The medical records of 148 patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer were screened from January 2008 to April 2014, and 74 patients were found eligible for the analysis. All patients received two fractions of 8 Gy each of ILBT, followed by EBRT. Patients were assessed for the symptom scores of dysphagia, odynophagia, regurgitation, and chest pain and weight was recorded periodically.

RESULTS

For a median follow-up of 6 months, the median OS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.5-10.5). The median dysphagia free survival was 6 months (95% CI: 4.8-7.1). The scores for dysphagia significantly improved after completion of 1(st) ILBT (p = 0.000), 2(nd) ILBT (p = 0.000), and at 3 months after EBRT compared to ILBT (p = 0.02). Overall 47% had improvement in dysphagia scores and 35% maintained the improvement of scores till last follow up. There was significant improvement in weight after completion of ILBT (p = 0.001) and at 3 months after completion of EBRT (p = 0.00). Twenty nine (39%) patients required nasogastric (NGT) insertions and 12 (16%) needed hospitalization for supportive care. 36.4% had complications in the form of stricture (27%), fistula (5.4%), and bleeding (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative radiotherapy is an effective alternative for palliation of dysphagia with improvement in symptom scores being evident and sustained. The results of this clinical audit were comparable with those from the trial setting.

Carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer

Survival in patients with metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer is dismal. No standard treatment has been established. Carboplatin/paclitaxel is active in both advanced gastric and esophageal cancer. Here we retrospectively present our single center experience. Between 1998 and 2013, a total of 134 patients with metastatic esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel (carboplatin predominantly area under the curve 5 and paclitaxel predominantly 175 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks as first-line therapy were identified. Baseline characteristics, response to therapy, toxicities, and survival in this patient population were evaluated. Overall survival was defined as date from diagnosis to death or last follow up, and progression-free survival was defined at time from cycle 1 to, progression or last follow up. Kaplan-Meier curves were fit to estimate overall and progression-free survival. Of the 134 patients evaluated, the median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Disease control rate was 62.6% (complete response: 11%, partial response: 28%, stable disease: 33%). Median overall survival from date of initial diagnosis was 15.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.5). Median progression-free survival from date of initiation of carboplatin and paclitaxel was 5.3 months (95% CI 0.34-0.5). Grade III or greater toxicity occurred in 26.1% of patients. The most common grade III toxicities were neutropenia and neuropathy, present in 14.2% and 3.7% of the total study population, respectively. In patients with metastatic or unresectable esophageal or gastric cancer, the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is well tolerated with comparable overall survival and progression-free survival to existing regimens in this population.

A phase II study of paclitaxel and nedaplatin as front-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-nedaplatin combination as a front-line regimen in Chinese patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS: A two-center, open-label, single-arm phase II study was designed. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy and adverse events. Patients received 175 mg/m² of paclitaxel over a 3 h infusion on 1 d, followed by nedaplatin 80 mg/m² in a 1 h infusion on 2 d every 3 wk until the documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient’s refusal.

RESULTS: Of the 36 patients assessable for efficacy, there were 2 patients (5.1%) with complete response and 16 patients (41.0%) with partial response, giving an overall response rate of 46.1%. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival for all patients were 7.1 mo (95%CI: 4.6-9.7) and 12.4 mo (95%CI: 9.5-15.3), respectively. Toxicities were moderate and manageable. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (15.4%), nausea (10.3%), anemia (7.7%), thrombocytopenia (5.1%), vomiting (5.1%) and neutropenia fever (2.6%).

CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and nedaplatin is active and well tolerated as a first-line therapy for patients with metastatic ESCC.

Chemotherapeutic options for gastroesophageal junction tumors

A doublet of a fluoropyrimidine and a platinum compound remains the reference regimen in palliative chemotherapy for esophagogastric cancers. Newer regimens involve the substitution of infusional 5-fluorouracil (FU) for a shorter infusional schedule or oral 5-FU prodrugs and the replacement of cisplatin with oxaliplatin. Although the addition of epirubicin to the standard 2-drug regimen is part of routine practice, there are no randomized data to support a benefit. In contrast, the docetaxel-based docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU regimen has been shown to modestly improve survival compared with 5-FU/cisplatin alone but at the expense of significant additional toxicity, which has hindered widespread acceptance of this regimen. Irinotecan-containing regimens have also been evaluated in a few phase III evaluations but are not clearly superior to 5-FU/cisplatin or even infusional 5-FU alone. Nevertheless, their favorable toxicity profile indicates that infusional 5-FU/irinotecan regimens also represent a first-line therapy option. In addition to its primary role in palliative therapy, there are also now established peri- or postoperative chemotherapy strategies that increase survival rates by approximately 10-15% compared with surgery alone. Preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors has also been shown to improve outcomes.

A phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, carboplatin and capecitabine (ECarboX) in advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The protease inhibitor bortezomib attenuates the action of NF-κB and has shown preclinical activity alone and in combination with chemotherapy.

DESIGN

A Phase I dose-escalation study was performed administering bortezomib (0.7, 1.0, 1.3 and 1.6 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 from cycle 2 onwards) in combination with Epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) intravenously on day 1, Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1 and Capecitabine 625 mg m(-2) BD days 1-21 every 21 days (VECarboX regimen), in patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Bortezomib when combined with ECarboX.

RESULTS

18 patients received bortezomib 0.7 (n = 6), 1.0 (n = 3), 1.3 (n = 6) and 1.6 mg m(-2) (n = 3) and a protocol amendment reducing the capecitabine dose to 500 mg m(-2) BD was enacted due to myelotoxicity. Common treatment-related non-haematological adverse events of any grade were fatigue (83.3 %), anorexia (55.6 %), constipation (55.6 %) and nausea (55.6 %). Common Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were neutropenia (77.8 %) and thrombocytopenia (44.4 %). Objective responses were achieved in 6 patients (33.3 %) and a further 5 patients (27.8 %) had stable disease for >8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of Bortezomib to ECarboX is well tolerated and response rates are comparable with standard chemotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness of gene-expression profiling for tumor-site origin

OBJECTIVES

Gene-expression profiling (GEP) reliably supplements traditional clinicopathological information on the tissue of origin (TOO) in metastatic or poorly differentiated cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis of GEP TOO testing versus usual care was conducted from a US third-party payer perspective.

METHODS

Data on recommendation changes for chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, blood tests, imaging investigations, and hospice care were obtained from a retrospective, observational study of patients whose physicians received GEP TOO test results. The effects of chemotherapy recommendation changes on survival were based on the results of trials cited in National Comprehensive Cancer Network and UpToDate guidelines. Drug and administration costs were based on average doses reported in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Other unit costs came from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedules. Quality-of-life weights were obtained from literature. Bootstrap analysis estimated sample variability; probabilistic sensitivity analysis addressed parameter uncertainty.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy regimen recommendations consistent with guidelines for final tumor-site diagnoses increased significantly from 42% to 65% (net difference 23%; P<0.001). Projected overall survival increased from 15.9 to 19.5 months (mean difference 3.6 months; two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-3.9). The average increase in quality-adjusted life-months was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.5-4.3), and average third-party payer costs per patient increased by $10,360 (95% CI $2,982-$19,192). The cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was $46,858 (95% CI $13,351-$104,269).

CONCLUSIONS

GEP TOO testing significantly altered clinical practice patterns and is projected to increase overall survival, quality-adjusted life-years, and costs, resulting in an expected cost per quality-adjusted life-year of less than $50,000.

A phase II trial of gefitinib for recurrent or metastatic cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

Conventional chemotherapeutic agents are of limited benefit in patients with recurrent or metastatic cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). We report results from a phase II trial in this population using gefitinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility required a diagnosis of esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, which was either metastatic or recurrent and incurable after initial therapy. No more than one prior chemotherapy regimen was permitted. Treatment consisted of gefitinib 250 mg daily for a minimum of 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Between April 2003 and January 2010, 58 patients, including 18 who were chemotherapy-naïve, were entered into this trial. Toxicity was modest, although most experienced grade 1-2 diarrhea and/or skin rash. There were 4 partial responders (7%) and 10 patients with stable disease (17%). The clinical benefit (partial response and stable disease) lasted for a median 6.1 months. Median survival for all patients was 5.5 months with survival projections at 1-year of 24.6% and at 2-years of 12.5%.

CONCLUSION

Gefitinib was well tolerated but of limited efficacy in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal or GEJ cancer. Further study of this or similar agents will require better patient selection.

Cisplatin/Irinotecan versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as definitive chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare toxicities, disease control, and survival outcomes for patients treated with either cisplatin/irinotecan versus carboplatin/paclitaxel concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective comparison between treatment groups: the cisplatin/irinotecan group was treated with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, whereas the carboplatin/paclitaxel group began with chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 additional cycles of chemotherapy. Acute toxicities, response rates, disease control, survival outcomes, and patterns of failure were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and December 2007, 57 patients were identified for inclusion in the present study (38 cisplatin/irinotecan and 19 carboplatin/paclitaxel). Groups were well-balanced by clinical-, pathologic-, staging-, and treatment-related factors. Thirty-five patients (92%) in the cisplatin/irinotecan group and 18 patients (95%) in the carboplatin/paclitaxel group completed the concurrent phase of chemoradiotherapy. There were no significant differences in hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities between the groups. At a median survivor follow-up of 37.6 months (range: 7.3-59.3 months) for the entire population, 22 patients were alive (16 without evidence of disease). The 3-year overall survival estimates was 19.7% for the cisplatin/irinotecan group versus 56.1% for the carboplatin/paclitaxel group (P = 0.022). Estimated 3-year cancer-specific survivals were 24.6% for the cisplatin/irinotecan group versus 59.3% for the carboplatin/paclitaxel group (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel is well-tolerated and provided superior overall and disease-specific survival compared with cisplatin/irinotecan chemoradiotherapy in the present study population. Further investigation is warranted.

A phase II study of paclitaxel by weekly 1-h infusion for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol(®)) in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with recurrent or advanced esophageal cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) once weekly by 1-h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 of a 49-day cycle. Fifty-two patients were evaluable for efficacy and 53 for safety. Forty-one (77%) patients had recurrent, and 12 (23%) had advanced disease. Most patients (52/53) had squamous cell carcinoma, and one had adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

A median of 2 cycles was delivered (range 1-8). The overall response rate was 44.2% (23/52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 30.5, 58.7%), with 4 patients (7.7%) achieving complete response. The median duration of response was 4.8 months, and median overall survival was 10.4 months. The most common Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (52.8%), leukopenia (45.3%), anorexia (9.4%), and fatigue (9.4%). Adverse events resulted in treatment discontinuation in 34.0% of patients and dose reductions in 43.4%. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel demonstrated efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer and may be a treatment option for this population.

The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0-IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies.

RESULTS

The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments.

DISCUSSION

Based on findings from this review, there is no single "best practice" approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.

Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center

BACKGROUND

There is a known inverse relationship between the number of esophagectomies and in-hospital mortality. Our institute is a tertiary referral center with a high caseload of esophageal cancer patients, but with a low annual volume of esophagectomies. The objective of our study was to evaluate the results of esophageal cancer surgery in our institute and to compare these results with published data from high-surgical-volume institutions.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2007, 1,499 patients with esophageal cancer were referred: for a second opinion only (n = 568), following earlier treatment (n = 103), for palliative treatment (n = 665) or for potentially curative treatment (local endoscopic therapy n = 5, definitive chemoradiotherapy n = 71, or surgery n = 87). The surgically treated patients were studied in detail, and compared with patients treated in high-surgical-volume hospitals.

RESULTS

Surgery consisted of a transhiatal (n = 71) or transthoracic (n = 12) esophagectomy, or exploration only (n = 4). Fifty-six (64%) patients received neoadjuvant treatment. A microscopic radical resection was achieved in 96%. Pathologic complete response rate was 25%. Forty-four (53%) patients had a complicated postoperative course, and one (1%) patient died. At a median postoperative follow-up of 30 (1-149) months, 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 89% and 60%, respectively. No major differences were observed between our results and those presented in six large study cohorts with high operative volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of low-volume esophageal surgery can be comparable to published high-surgical-volume results. More relevant factors other than hospital volume alone should be taken into account to improve outcome of esophageal cancer surgery.

A phase II study of paclitaxel and nedaplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel and nedaplatin as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer received 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel over a 3 h infusion, followed by nedaplatin 80 mg/m(2) in a 1 h infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks until the documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient's refusal.

RESULTS

Between March 2005 and December 2007, 48 patients entered in the study. Forty-six (95.8%) of the 48 patients were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 41.7% (95% CI, 27.8-55.7%) with 2 complete responses and 18 partial responses. The median follow-up period was 20.5 months (range, 12.5-27.2 months). The median overall time to progression and overall survival (OS) were 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.8-7.4 months) and 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.1-13.9 months), respectively. The estimate of OS at 12 and 24 months was 43.8% (95% CI, 29.7-77.8%) and 10.4% (95% CI, 1.8-19.1%), respectively. Most patients experienced anemia, during their course of therapy with 6 (13.0%) patients for grade 3/4 anemia, and grade 1 or 2 anemia was detected in 23 (50%) patients. Grade 3 leucopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were documented in 8 (17.4%), 9 (17.4%) and 2 (4.3%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were detected in 3 (6.5%) and 2 (4.3%) patients, respectively. Two patients (4.3%) were hospitalized because of treatment-related complications. The treatment was well tolerated and no toxic death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of paclitaxel and nedaplatin is a tolerated treatment modality with promising activity in previously untreated advanced esophageal cancer.

Phase II evaluation of nedaplatin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency and toxicities of nedaplatin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus.

METHODS

Thirty-nine untreated patients with confirmed metastatic tumors were enrolled. Patients were treated with nedaplatin 80 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were eligible to be evaluated to have had a response. The overall response rate was 43.6% (17/39), with complete response and partial response rates of 2.6 and 41%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival time was 6.1 and 10.3 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were only observed in six patients [neutropenia in three patients (7.7%) and nausea/vomiting in three patients (7.7%)].

CONCLUSION

Comparing to other regimens, combination of nedaplatin and paclitaxel achieved an encouraging clinical outcome, with relatively minimal toxicities for patients with metastatic esophageal carcinoma.

Bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin as a first-line regimen for patients with metastatic esophageal, gastric, and gastroesophageal cancer: phase II results from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N044B)

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to explore the response rate of a first-line, three-drug regimen that consisted of bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cardia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with the above diagnosis and acceptable organ function were treated intravenously on a 21-day cycle with the following: bortezomib 1.2 mg/m on days 1, 4, and 8; paclitaxel 175 mg/m on day 2; and carboplatin with an area under the curve of 6 on day 2. Patients received indefinite treatment unless they manifested tumor progression or severe adverse events. All were monitored for tumor response as well as other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 35 eligible patients with a median age of 59 years (range, 36-78) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0, 1, and 2 in 60%, 34%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Although this regimen was well tolerated, the tumor response rate was lower than that anticipated at 23% (95% confidence interval: 10%, 40%), thereby prompting premature study closure. There were no complete responses. The median survival for the cohort was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval: 5.9, 12.8).

CONCLUSION

As prescribed in this trial and for this indication, this regimen does not merit further testing.

A phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the response rate, survival, and toxicities of paclitaxel plus cisplatin combination in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with definite measurable indices and no prior chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) by 2-hour infusion on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled of which 35 patients were eligible to be evaluated to have had a response. The overall response rate was 48.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-0.65] with complete and partial response rates of 2.8% and 45.7%, respectively. The median time to progression was 7 months, and median survival time of all patients was 13 months. There was a significant difference in the median overall survival between the patients who had showed response versus those who had not (P = 0.006). Median survival was 17 (95% CI, 11.9-22.0) and 10 months (95% CI, 7.6-12.4), respectively. The 1-year survival probability was 39%. Relief of dysphagia and pain were observed in 86.2% of all the patients. The most common toxicities were neutropenia and alopecia. No grade 4 toxicities and treatment-related deaths were recorded in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel and cisplatin is a promising treatment for patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The toxicity of this regimen is within acceptable range.

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation with or without surgery for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, cisplatin is associated with significant toxicity. We conducted a phase II clinical trial of concurrent paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation with or without surgery as an alternative to the standard cisplatin-based CRT for localized and metastatic esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Fifty patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled: 16 patients with stage II, eight patients with stage III, and 26 patients with stage IV disease. Two thirds (67%) of patients had adenocarcinoma and one third (33%) with squamous histology. Patients with resectable disease were treated with paclitaxel 30 mg/m, twice weekly for 10 doses, carboplatin AUC (area under the curve) 1.5 weekly for five doses; and concurrent radiation, 1.8 Gy/day, for a total of 45 Gy, followed by esophagectomy. Without surgery, patients received an additional dose each of paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiation for a total of 50.4 Gy, followed by two consolidation cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m) and carboplatin (AUC 6).

RESULTS

During CRT, common stage III/IV toxicities included nausea/emesis (19%), esophagitis (9%), and neutropenia (4%). For consolidation chemotherapy, neutropenia (23%), neuropathy (8%) and nausea/emesis (4%) were the most common stage III/IV side effects. After CRT, 26% had a complete response, 17% had a partial response, and 41% had stable disease. Ninety-one percent of patients had clinical improvement of dysphagia. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the median survival was 12 months for patients with metastatic disease, 44 months for localized disease treated with esophagectomy, and >44 months for localized disease treated with definitive CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation with or without surgery is well tolerated with promising efficacy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Clinical pharmacology and use of microtubule-targeting agents in cancer therapy

The microtubule-targeting agents have made significant contributions to cancer therapy over the past 50 years. The vinca alkaloids and taxanes have been used to treat a broad range of malignancies, including leukemias and lymphomas and many types of solid tumors. The taxanes have been frequently used in the treatment of advanced ovarian, breast, lung, head and neck, and prostate cancer, and they are increasingly being used in early stage disease. This chapter reviews the pharmacology, clinical indications, and toxicities associated with the vinca alkaloids and taxanes.