The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Effect of Segmental Abutting Esophagus-Sparing Technique to Reduce Severe Esophagitis in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Hypofractionated Thoracic Radiation and Chemotherapy

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of segmental abutting esophagus-sparing (SAES) radiotherapy on reducing severe acute esophagitis in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Thirty patients were enrolled from the experimental arm (45 Gy in 3 Gy daily fractions in 3 weeks) of an ongoing phase III trial (NCT02688036). The whole esophagus was divided into the involved esophagus and the abutting esophagus (AE) according to the distance from the edge of the clinical target volume. All dosimetric parameters were significantly reduced for the whole esophagus and AE. The maximal and mean doses of the esophagus (47.4 ± 1.9 Gy and 13.5 ± 5.8 Gy, respectively) and AE (42.9 ± 2.3 Gy and 8.6 ± 3.6 Gy, respectively) in the SAES plan were significantly lower than those (esophagus 48.0 ± 1.9 Gy and 14.7± 6.1 Gy, AE 45.1 ± 2.4 Gy and 9.8 ± 4.2 Gy, respectively) in the non-SAES plan. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, only one patient (3.3%) developed grade 3 acute esophagitis, and no grade 4-5 events happened. SAES radiotherapy has significant dosimetric advantages, which are successfully translated into clinical benefits and provide good feasibility for dose escalation to improve local control and prognosis in the future.

Radiotherapy Fraction in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 8006 Reconstructed Individual Patient Data

The optimal thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose and fractionation for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) using modern techniques remain unclear. We conducted systematic review and meta-analyses of the efficacy and safety differences between definitive hypofractionated TRT (HypoTRT), conventional TRT (ConvTRT) and hyperfractionated TRT (HyperTRT), especially in the modern era. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world cohorts, and single-arm trials published between 1990 and 2021 were identified. Two meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) were conducted: (i) a random-effects meta-analysis based on reconstructed individual-patient data (IPD) of all studies; and (ii) a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on study-level aggregated data (AD) of RCTs. The incidences of severe radiation-related toxicities were compared using the random-effects meta-regression model. Overall, 53 of the 30,031 publications met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 8006 IPD were reconstructed. After adjusting for key treatment variables and stratification by study type, there were no significant differences in the OS rates between the altered fractionation regimens (HypoTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR [adjusted HR] = 1.05, 95% CI 0.93-1.19; ConvTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR = 1.00, 95% CI 0·90-1.11; HypoTRT vs. ConvTRT, aHR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.20). In the modern era, the survival outcomes of all three schedules, while remaining comparable, have improved significantly. Results of the AD-based network meta-analysis were consistent with those of IPD analysis, and HypoTRT was ranked as the best regimen (SUCRA = 81%). There were no significant differences in toxicities between groups when using modern radiation techniques. In the modern era, no significant differences in OS or severe radiation-related toxicities were observed between altered schedules in LS-SCLC. HypoTRT may be associated with moderate and non-significant OS improvements, which should be further confirmed in prospective randomized phase III trials.

Progression-Free Survival and Time to Progression as Potential Surrogate Endpoints for Overall Survival in Chemoradiotherapy Trials in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To investigate whether progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP) could be a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) receiving combined chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Literature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library up to 2021. Prediction models were firstly established using data from phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and then externally validated in phase II and retrospective studies. Correlation analysis was evaluated by a weighted linear regression model at both trial and arm levels. Cross-validation was performed to assess the consistency and robustness of the established models.

Results

37 studies, including 15 phase III RCTs, 12 phase II studies, and 10 retrospective studies, were selected in the final analysis. In trial-level surrogacy, a very good correlation was observed between hazard ratios (HRs) of PFS/TTP and OS (R2 = 0.783, 95% CI 0.771–0.794). In arm-level surrogacy, very good correlations were also observed between 2-year (R2 = 0.823, 95% CI 0.814–0.832), 3-year (R2 = 0.843, 95% CI 0.833–0.850), 5-year (R2 = 0.852, 95% CI 0.843–0.859) PFS/TTP, and 5-year OS. An excellent correlation was observed between 4-year PFS/TTP and 5-year OS (R2 = 0.906, 95% CI 0.901–0.910). Cross-validation demonstrated reasonable overall consistency. External validation in phase II and retrospective studies showed good agreement (R2, 0.728–0.824).

Conclusions

PFS/TTP was a valid surrogate endpoint for OS in patients with LS-SCLC receiving combined chemoradiotherapy. The finding provides high-level evidence to support PFS/TTP as the primary endpoint in clinical trials so as to speed up introducing novel agents to the treatment of LS-SCLC.

Radiation oncology in times of COVID-2019: A review article for those in the eye of the storm - An Indian perspective

The global COVID-2019 pandemic has presented to the field of radiation oncology a management dilemma in providing evidence-based treatments to all cancer patients. There is a need for appropriate measures to be taken to reduce infectious spread between the medical healthcare providers and the patient population. Such times warrant resource prioritization and to continue treatment with best available evidence, thereby reducing the risk of COVID-2019 transmission in times where the workforce is reduced. There has been literature presented in different aspects related to providing safety measures, running of a radiation department and for the management of various cancer subsites. In this article, we present a comprehensive review for sustaining a radiation oncology department in times of the COVID-2019 pandemic.

Radiation Fractionation Schedules Published During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of the Quality of Evidence and Recommendations for Future Development

PURPOSE

Numerous publications during the COVID-19 pandemic recommended the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy. This project assessed aggregate changes in the quality of the evidence supporting these schedules to establish a comprehensive evidence base for future reference and highlight aspects for future study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Based on a systematic review of published recommendations related to dose fractionation during the COVID-19 pandemic, 20 expert panelists assigned to 14 disease groups named and graded the highest quality of evidence schedule(s) used routinely for each condition and also graded all COVID-era recommended schedules. The American Society for Radiation Oncology quality of evidence criteria were used to rank the schedules. Process-related statistics and changes in distributions of quality ratings of the highest-rated versus recommended COVID-19 era schedules were described by disease groups and for specific clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

From January to May 2020 there were 54 relevant publications, including 233 recommended COVID-19-adapted dose fractionations. For site-specific curative and site-specific palliative schedules, there was a significant shift from established higher-quality evidence to lower-quality evidence and expert opinions for the recommended schedules (P = .022 and P < .001, respectively). For curative-intent schedules, the distribution of quality scores was essentially reversed (highest levels of evidence "pre-COVID" vs "in-COVID": high quality, 51.4% vs 4.8%; expert opinion, 5.6% vs 49.3%), although there was variation in the magnitude of shifts between disease sites and among specific indications.

CONCLUSIONS

A large number of publications recommended hypofractionated radiation therapy schedules across numerous major disease sites during the COVID-19 pandemic, which were supported by a lower quality of evidence than the highest-quality routinely used dose fractionation schedules. This work provides an evidence-based assessment of these potentially practice-changing recommendations and informs individualized decision-making and counseling of patients. These data could also be used to support radiation therapy practices in the event of second waves or surges of the pandemic in new regions of the world.

First statement on preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic in large German Speaking University-based radiation oncology departments

The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging modern radiation oncology. At University Hospitals, we have a mandate to offer high-end treatments to all cancer patients. However, in times of crisis we must learn to prioritize resources, especially personnel. Compromising oncological outcome will blur all statistics, therefore all measures must be taken with great caution. Communication with our neighboring countries, within societies and between departments can help meet the challenge. Here, we report on our learning system and preparation measures to effectively tackle the COVID-19 challenge in University-Based Radiation Oncology Departments.

A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following treatment recommended by the European Society of Medical Oncology for SCLC in order to determine a benchmark for novel therapies to be compared with.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting overall survival following chemotherapy for SCLC were included. We calculated survival at 30 and 90-days along with 1-year, 2-year and median.

RESULTS

We identified 160 for inclusion. There were minimal 30-day deaths. Survival was 99 % (95 %CI 98.0-99.0 %, I²33.9 %, n = 77) and 90 % (95 %CI 89.0-92.0 %, I²79.5 %, n = 73) at 90 days for limited (LD-SCLC) and extensive stage (ED-SCLC) respectively. The median survival for LD-SCLC was 18.1 months (95 %CI 17.0-19.1 %, I²77.3 %, n = 110) and early thoracic radiotherapy (thoracic radiotherapy 18.4 months (95 %CI 17.3-19.5, I²78.4 %, n = 100)) vs no radiotherapy 11.7 months (95 %CI 9.1-14.3, n = 10), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI 19.7 months vs No PCI 13.0 months (95 %CI 18.5-21.0, I²75.7 %, n = 78 and 95 %CI 10.5-16.6, I²81.1 %, n = 15 respectively)) and better performance status (PS0-1 22.5 months vs PS0-4 15.3 months (95 %CI 18.7-26.1, I²72.4 %, n = 11 and 95 %CI 11.5-19.1 I²77.9 %, n = 13)) augmented this. For ED-SCLC the median survival was 9.6 months (95 %CI 8.9-10.3 %, I²95.2 %, n = 103) and this improved when irinotecan + cisplatin was used, however studies that used this combination were mostly conducted in Asian populations where survival was better. Survival was not improved with the addition of thoracic radiotherapy or PCI. Survival for both stages of cancer was better in modern studies and Asian cohorts. It was poorer for studies administering carboplatin + etoposide but this regimen was used in studies that had fewer patient selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

Early thoracic radiotherapy and PCI should be offered to people with LD-SCLC in accordance with guideline recommendations. The benefit of the aforementioned therapies to treat ED-SCLC and the use of chemotherapy in people with poor PS is less clear.

Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review

Background

Patients with limited-stage (ls) or extensive-stage (es) small-cell lung cancer (sclc) are commonly given platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Standard chemotherapy for patients with ls sclc includes a platinum agent such as cisplatin combined with the non-platinum agent etoposide. The objective of the present systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with es sclc and to determine the appropriate timing, dose, and schedule of chemotherapy or radiation for patients with sclc.

Methods

The medline and embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy against treatment with chemotherapy alone in patients with es sclc. Identified rcts were also included if they compared various timings, doses, and schedules of treatment for patients with es sclc or ls sclc.

Results

Sixty-four rcts were included. In patients with ls sclc, overall survival was greatest with platinum-etoposide compared with other chemotherapy regimens. In patients with es sclc, overall survival was greatest with chemotherapy containing platinum-irinotecan than with chemotherapy containing platinum-etoposide (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 0.95; p = 0.006). The addition of radiation to chemotherapy for patients with es sclc showed mixed results. There was no conclusive evidence that the timing, dose, or schedule of thoracic radiation affected treatment outcomes in sclc.

Conclusions

In patients with ls sclc, cisplatin-etoposide plus radiotherapy should remain the standard therapy. In patients with es sclc, the evidence is insufficient to recommend the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy as standard practice to improve overall survival. However, on a case-by-case basis, radiotherapy might be added to reduce local recurrence. The most commonly used chemotherapy is platinum-etoposide; however, platinum-irinotecan can be considered.

Lessons Learned From Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico: Practical Measures to Mitigate the Impact of a Catastrophic Natural Disaster on Radiation Oncology Patients

PURPOSE

Although the wind, rain, and flooding of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico abated shortly after its landfall on September 20, 2017, the disruption of the electrical, communications, transportation, and medical infrastructure of the island was unprecedented in scope and caused lasting harm for many months afterward. A compilation of recommendations from radiation oncologists who were in Puerto Rico during the disaster, and from a panel of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) cancer experts was created.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiation oncologists throughout Puerto Rico collaborated and improvised to continue treating patients in the immediate aftermath of the storm and as routine clinical operations were restored gradually. Empirical lessons from the experience of radiation therapy administration in this profoundly altered context of limited resources, impaired communication, and inadequate transportation were organized into a recommended template, applicable to any radiation oncology practice. ASTRO disease-site experts provided evidence-guidelines for mitigating the impact of a 2- to 3-week interruption in radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Practical measures to mitigate the medical impact of a disaster are summarized within the framework of "Prepare, Communicate, Operate, Compensate." Specific measures include the development of an emergency operations plan tailored to specific circumstances, prospective coordination with other radiation oncology clinics before a disaster, ongoing communications with emergency management organizations, and routine practice of alternate methods to disseminate information among providers and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations serve as a starting point to assist any radiation oncology practice in becoming more resiliently prepared for a local or regional disruption from any cause. Disease-site experts provide evidence-based guidelines on how to mitigate the impact of a 2- to 3-week interruption in radiation therapy for lung, head and neck, uterine cervix, breast, and prostate cancers through altered fractionation or dose escalation.

Guideline for the Initial Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer (Limited and Extensive Stage) and the Role of Thoracic Radiotherapy and First-line Chemotherapy

AIMS

We investigated the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and the appropriate timing, dose and schedule of treatment for patients with ES-SCLC or limited stage SCLC (LS-SCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care and by the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group through a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

In patients with LS-SCLC (stage I, II and III), the addition of thoracic radiotherapy to standard chemotherapy is recommended. However, there is no clear evidence to inform definitive recommendations for optimal timing, sequential versus concurrent therapies and optimal dose or regimen. In patients with LS-SCLC, etoposide-cisplatin is the preferred regimen for adults who are being treated with combined modality therapy with curative intent. In patients with ES-SCLC (stage IV), there is insufficient evidence to recommend the addition of thoracic radiotherapy to standard chemotherapy as a standard practice for survival benefit; however, it could be considered on a case-by-case basis to reduce local recurrence. In patients with ES-SCLC, a platinum agent plus etoposide is the preferred regimen for adult patients who are being treated with combined modality therapy. Cisplatin and irinotecan represents an alternative treatment option to this, but is associated with increased rates of adverse events such as diarrhoea.

A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing a Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Etoposide to a Etoposide Regimen without Cisplatin for Patients with Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

In a literature meta-analysis, we showed survival benefits for regimens including cisplatin [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.66] and for those including etoposide (HR 0.65; 0.61–0.69). That benefit was mainly observed when etoposide alone or in combination with cisplatin was included in the chemotherapy regimens. Our objective was to determine if chemotherapy with both drugs improves survival in comparison to a non-platinum regimen with etoposide.

Methods

Extensive small-cell lung cancer patients were randomized between cisplatin–etoposide (CE) and ifosfamide + etoposide + epirubicin regimen (IVE) between 2000 and 2013.

Results

176 and 170 eligible patients were allocated to CE and IVE (315 deaths were required before analysis), respectively. Objective response rates were not significantly different: 60% with CE and 59% with IVE. No statistically significant difference in median survival and 1-year and 2-year was observed with rates of 9.6 months, 31 and 5% for CE and 10 months, 39 and 9% for IVE, respectively. HR was 0.84 (95% CI 0.68–1.05, p = 0.16). Only two prognostic factors for survival were retained in multivariate analysis: sex with HR = 0.69 (95% CI 0.49–0.97, p = 0.03) and performance status with HR = 0.53 (95% CI 0.49–0.97, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for these prognostic factors, HR for survival was 0.83 (95% CI 0.65–1.08, p = 0.17). There was more thrombopenia in the CE regimen and more leukopenia with IVE.

Conclusion

Combination of CE failed to improve survival in comparison to an etoposide-containing regimen without cisplatin.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00658580?term=ELCWP+01994&rank=1, identifier NCT00658580.

Thoracic irradiation in 3weeks for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Is twice a day fractionation really needed?

PURPOSE

Many Canadian institutions treat limited-disease small cell lung cancer with 40Gy in 15 fractions delivered once-a-day in 3weeks concomitantly with chemotherapy. This regimen is convenient and seems to be effective. Here, we report and compare with a literature review the outcomes of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated in our institution with this hypofractionated regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2012, patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated curatively with platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at a dose of 40Gy in 16 fractions once-a-day were eligible for this review.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients fit the analysis criteria, including ten patients with small pleural effusion. The median age was 66years old. After a median follow-up of 77months for those alive, the median survival was 28months. At 3 and 5years respectively, the locoregional control rates were 67 and 64%, while the overall survival rates were 40 and 35%. Prophylaxis cranial irradiation was delivered to 68% of the patients. Grade 2 and 3 acute esophagitis occurred in respectively 49 and 9% of the patients. There was no grade 4 radiation-induced toxicity. All patients, except for one, completed their thoracic irradiation course without interruption.

CONCLUSION

Once-a-day hypofractionated radiation with concurrent chemotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation is a practical regimen. Based on our experience and the published literature, it appears to be similarly effective as regimens using twice-daily fractionation in 3weeks, or once-daily in 6 to 7weeks with higher radiotherapy doses. Further prospective comparisons of hypofractionation with the current recommendations are needed.

Increased Biological Effective Dose of Radiation Correlates with Prolonged Survival of Patients with Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is a critical component of the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, the optimal radiation dose/fractionation remains elusive. This study reviewed current evidence and explored the dose-response relationship in patients with LS-SCLC who were treated with radiochemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A quantitative analysis was performed through a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The correlations between the biological effective dose (BED) and median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) as well as local relapse (LR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

In all, 2389 patients in 19 trials were included in this study. Among these 19 trials, seven were conducted in Europe, eight were conducted in Asia and four were conducted in the United States. The 19 trials that were included consisted of 29 arms with 24 concurrent and 5 sequential TRT arms. For all included studies, the results showed that a higher BED prolonged the mOS (R2 = 0.198, p<0.001) and the mPFS (R2 = 0.045, p<0.001). The results also showed that increased BED improved the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. A 10-Gy increment added a 6.3%, a 5.1% and a 3.7% benefit for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, respectively. Additionally, BED was negatively correlated with LR (R2 = 0.09, p<0.001). A subgroup analysis of concurrent TRT showed that a high BED prolonged the mOS (p<0.001) and the mPFS (p<0.001), improved the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS (p<0.001) and decreased the rate of LR (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that an increased BED was associated with improved OS, PFS and decreased LR in patients with LS-SCLC who were treated with combined chemoradiotherapy, which indicates that the strategy of radiation dose escalation over a limited time frame is worth exploring in a prospective clinical trial.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13% of all lung cancers, and limited-disease SCLC is defined as a disease that can be encompassed within a tolerable radiation field. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for limited-disease SCLC. In both concurrent and consolidation chemoradiotherapies, the combination of etoposide and cisplatin is considered to be a standard chemotherapy regimen. To develop novel treatment for SCLC, several clinical trials of molecular-targeted therapy or immunotherapy have been reported. However, no molecular-targeted drug has shown clinical activity in limited-disease SCLC. In future studies, understanding the molecular profile of SCLC will be necessary for the development of molecular-targeted therapies for SCLC. This review provides an overview of chemotherapy regimens for limited-disease SCLC.

Feasibility of tomotherapy-based image-guided radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer

Background: To assess the tolerance of patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiation with tomotherapy-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the toxicity profile for nine patients with small cell lung cancer of the limited stage who underwent chemoradiation delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) has been conducted.

Results: Acute grade 3–4 hematologic and esophagitis toxicities developed in two and three patients respectively. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism during radiotherapy. Seven patients had weight loss ranging from 0 to 30 pounds (median: 4 pounds). Three patients had treatment breaks ranging from 2 to 12 days. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range: 2–24 months), no patients developed any radiation related toxicities such as grade 3–4 pneumonitis or other long-term complications. The median survival was estimated to be 15 months. There were two local recurrences, three mediastinal recurrences, and six distant metastases.

Conclusion: Grade 3–4 toxicities remained significant during chemoradiation when radiation was delivered with tomotherapy-based IGRT. However, the absence of grade 3–4 pneumonitis is promising and the use of HT needs to be investigated in future prospective studies.

[Successful treatment with multidisciplinary therapy including low-dose chemoradiotherapy against metastatic recurrences of small cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a case report]

Primary small cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis is a rare and aggressive disease; reportedly, a mean survival is only 8 months. A 78 year-old woman with chronic kidney disease was referred to our hospital complaining of asymptomatic gross hematoturia. On imaging studies and voided urine cytology, diagnosis of right renal pelvic cancer (cT2N0M0) was made. She underwent total nephroureterectomy. Pathological diagnosis was small cell carcinoma, infiltrating into the renal parenchyma, with lymphovascular invasion. Post-operatively, hemodialysis was introduced. Five months after the operation, new lesions developed in the right adrenal gland, aortocaval lymph nodes and subcutaneous layer of the right back. The subcutaneous mass was surgically removed and low-dose chemoradiotherapy (sigma 45 Gy/25 Fr/32 d + cisplatin 10 mg/d for 2 d x 2) was given to the other lesions. Although the lesions regressed to CR, new small masses emerged in the muscle layers of the right flank 14 months after total nephroureterectomy. Low-dose chemoradiotherapy (sigma 40 Gy/20 Fr/29 d + cisplatin 10 mg/d for 2 d x 2) to these lesions successfully brought CR. She is alive without any evidence of disease at 3 years after total nephroureterectomy.

Standard-dose versus higher-dose prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (PCI 99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212, and IFCT 99-01): a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The optimum dose of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown. A meta-analysis suggested that the incidence of brain metastases might be reduced with higher PCI doses. This randomised clinical trial compared the effect of standard versus higher PCI doses on the incidence of brain metastases.

METHODS

Between September, 1999, and December, 2005, 720 patients with limited-stage SCLC in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy from 157 centres in 22 countries were randomly assigned to a standard (n=360, 25 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 2.5 Gy) or higher PCI total dose (n=360, 36 Gy) delivered using either conventional (18 daily fractions of 2 Gy) or accelerated hyperfractionated (24 fractions in 16 days with two daily sessions of 1.5 Gy separated by a minimum interval of 6 h) radiotherapy. All of the treatment schedules excluded weekends. Randomisation was stratified according to medical centre, age (</=60 and >60 years), and interval between the start of induction treatment and the date of randomisation (</=90, 91-180, and >180 days). Eligible patients were randomised blindly by the data centre of the Institut Gustave Roussy (PCI99-01 and IFCT) using minimisation, and by the data centres of EORTC (EORTC ROG and LG) and RTOG (for CALGB, ECOG, RTOG, and SWOG), both using block stratification. The primary endpoint was the incidence of brain metastases at 2 years. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00005062.

FINDINGS

Five patients in the standard-dose group and four in the higher-dose group did not receive PCI; nonetheless, all randomised patients were included in the effectiveness anlysis. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 0-89 months), 145 patients had brain metastases; 82 in the standard-dose group and 63 in the higher-dose group. There was no significant difference in the 2-year incidence of brain metastases between the standard PCI dose group and the higher-dose group, at 29% (95% CI 24-35) and 23% (18-29), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.57-1.11], p=0.18). 226 patients in the standard-dose group and 252 in the higher-dose group died; 2-year overall survival was 42% (95% CI 37-48) in the standard-dose group and 37% (32-42) in the higher-dose group (HR 1.20 [1.00-1.44]; p=0.05). The lower overall survival in the higher-dose group is probably due to increased cancer-related mortality: 189 patients in the standard group versus 218 in the higher-dose group died of progressive disease. Five serious adverse events occurred in the standard-dose group versus zero in the higher-dose group. The most common acute toxic events were fatigue (106 [30%] patients in the standard-dose group vs 121 [34%] in the higher-dose group), headache (85 [24%] vs 99 [28%]), and nausea or vomiting (80 [23%] vs 101 [28%]).

INTERPRETATION

No significant reduction in the total incidence of brain metastases was observed after higher-dose PCI, but there was a significant increase in mortality. PCI at 25 Gy should remain the standard of care in limited-stage SCLC.

FUNDING

Institut Gustave-Roussy, Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (2001), Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (2007). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) contribution to this trial was supported by grants 5U10 CA11488-30 through 5U10 CA011488-38 from the US National Cancer Institute.