Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty With the Novel Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-25L: Results Using a Nasal Grid Approach

Facial Fillers and Surgical Rhinoplasty: Cross-Sectional Study

This study aims to provide an overview of how rhinoplasty surgeons manage patients with previous nonsurgical rhinoplasty and facial fillers. A multicenter international cross-sectional study was conducted in accordance with strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. A survey was distributed to members of the European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery and associated colleagues, with responses analyzed from surgeons performing over 10 rhinoplasties annually. A total of 171 surgeons from 45 countries participated, with 165 meeting the inclusion criteria. The respondents included ear, nose, and throat (41%), plastic (7%), maxillo-facial (10%), and facial plastic surgeons (23%), averaging 116 rhinoplasties annually and 13 years of experience. Among the surgeons, 74% perform rhinoplasty on patients with prior nasal fillers, typically waiting 21 weeks after filler rhinoplasty before surgery. Additionally, 44% of surgeons remove nasal fillers preoperatively, primarily using hyaluronidase. During surgery, 76% of surgeons remove nasal fillers, and 25% modify their surgical steps for patients with a history of fillers. This study shows that there is no clear consensus in the management of patients with nasal fillers. Surgeons are often unaware of the preoperative existence of nasal and facial fillers, their potential complications, and their management. To address this, guidelines should be established to facilitate the management of the growing number of patients with facial fillers.

The Use of Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty Using Italian Technique

INTRODUCTION

Projection and upper rotation to the tip is fundamental in the nasal rejuvenation, as a matter of fact the tip is the most important and has strongly effects on the improve appearance and quality of life. The aim of the present study was to evaluate reshaping the tip of the nose by cross-linked hyaluronic acid using Italian technique.

METHODS

In a period between November 2019 and 2023, a total of one hundred and forty healthy, 95 females and 45 man patients, were performed with a mean age 44±5 (age range: 31-52 years old) affected by tip of congenital (22) or ageing nose hypotonia (118), and reduced volume that need of an elevation of the nose tip. The anatomic markers have been considered for the anthropometric measurements after the filler rhinoplasty. Two infiltrations were performed, one in the infiltration into the antero-caudal access over the columella produce upward rotation of the tip of the nose and second infiltration into the antero-superior access produce the projection of the tip of the nose. Medical device used in the study was Neofound STRUCT LIDO (LOVE COSMEDICAL srls-Via Toniolo 9, 57022 Castagneto Carducci, ITALY) containing sodium hyaluronate/hyaluronic acid high molecular weight (1.500

RESULTS

The effect on the upward rotation of the tip nose was evaluated using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale and morphometric evaluation. All the subjects showed at least 2-3 grade improvement in GAIS score after HA filler injection. The analysis of patient satisfaction after the last follow-up visits clearly demonstrated good results. A significant morphometric difference was detected comparing the T0 and T90 (p<0,0001), while no difference was present comparing T90 and T180 means (p=0.11). The outcome of the present clinical study gives greater projection and upper rotation to the tip with great gratification of the patients and the surgeon. An augmentation of the tip nose with hyaluronic acid filler produces a rejuvenation of the nose area resulted in a more youthful appearance. No adverse event was observed. In 35 patients, additional HA infiltration had to be performed after 2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the Italian technique descripted in the present paper is safe, simply, and efficacious for rejuvenation of the nose, with elevated levels of patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Collapse

Key Words

• Aesthetic
• Filler
• Hyaluronic acid
• Non-surgical rhinoplasty
• Nose reshaping
• Rhinofiller
• Rhinoplasty

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage
• Female
• Rhinoplasty/methods
• Adult
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Italy
• Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage
• Treatment Outcome
• Nose/surgery
• Rejuvenation
• Quality of Life
• Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data
• Esthetics

Collapse

Grants

• Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio Chieti Pescara

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Antonio Scarano Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Andrea Sbarbati Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Anatomy and Histology Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Domenico Amuso Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
Roberto Amore Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
Segio Rexhep Tari Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy
Iris Alla Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy

Collapse

Structural Aesthetic Treatment With the Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-25L: Global Expert Considerations for Safe and Effective Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

VYC-25L is a robust, structural hyaluronic acid (HA) filler designed for facial volumizing, lifting, and contouring. It was first approved in 2019.

METHODS

A group of doctors with various specialties, who have used VYC-25L extensively since it first became available in their countries (3-5 years), share clinical experience and guidance on optimal use.

RESULTS

VYC-25L has a unique rheological and physicochemical profile that provides elevated lift capacity and enhanced projection, significant moldability immediately after injection, high levels of tissue integration, reversibility with hyaluronidase, and a long duration of clinical effects-typically lasting at least 24 months. The properties of VYC-25L have created new possibilities for nonsurgical facial medical aesthetics. However, as with any novel product, it is important that injectors recognize how best to use it for the benefit of patients. When first utilizing VYC-25L, it is advisable to start with the chin and jawline to gain familiarity with the gel characteristics before moving into other facial areas, and to consider splitting treatment over two or more sessions. Attention must also be given to injection volume, with less product typically required with VYC-25L compared to other fillers with similar indications. Key principles of good practice should be followed, including appropriate patient selection and pretreatment education, suitable choice of injection device and plane, aseptic technique, slow and careful administration method, and sufficient posttreatment follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

By adhering to these principles, VYC-25L can produce natural-looking and highly durable outcomes without substantial safety concerns.

Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review of Technique, Outcomes, Complications, and Its Treatments

BACKGROUND

For patients looking for temporary results or who do not want surgery, nonsurgical rhinoplasty using filler injections has become increasingly popular. Filler materials and surgical techniques have improved in recent years, but serious complications remain. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the common types of fillers and injection techniques, complications, and treatment to help clinicians perform in a safer and more effective way.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings search terms. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the appropriate search terms. Data collected from each study included injection materials, location, technique, patient satisfaction and complications, and treatment.

RESULTS

From the 1812 studies identified, 30 were included in the systematic review. A total of 9657 patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty, most commonly with hyaluronic acid (HA) (96.76%), followed by calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) (1.22%). Overall satisfaction was 99.08%. The overall incidence of complications was 39.11%, with the highest incidence of erythema and swelling (27.95%). Most of the complications are mild, but there are still 0.27% of the patients who have undergone severe complication-an arterial occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsurgical rhinoplasty is an effective and relatively safe option for improving the profile of the nose, with a short operative time and high patient satisfaction. Most of the complications were mild, but still serious vascular complications such as blindness, skin necrosis, and stroke were as high as 0.27%. A thorough understanding of the anatomy of the nasal vessels and a precise surgical technique is an important basis for prevention. A BULLET POINT LIST: (1) We summarize the common types of fillers and injection techniques, complications, and treatment of complications to guide physicians to perform nonsurgical rhinoplasty in a safer and more effective manner. (2) Out of 1812 studies through the search strategy, 30 articles were included in the systematic review. A total of 9657 patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty. (3) Nonsurgical rhinoplasty is an effective and relatively safe option to improve the profile of the nose, with a short surgical time and high patient satisfaction. (4) Most of the complications were mild, but some severe complications due to the vascular factors such as blindness, skin necrosis, and cerebral infarction need to be vigilant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nonsurgical rhinoplasty using the hyaluronic acid filler VYC-25L: Safety and patient satisfaction in a retrospective analysis of 492 patients

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic treatment of the nose with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is increasingly popular but carries a small risk of major complications. Large patient cohorts are required to better understand this risk.

AIMS

To evaluate safety and patient satisfaction in a large series of nonsurgical rhinoplasty treatments with the HA filler, VYC-25L, in "real world" clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing nonsurgical rhinoplasty with VYC-25L by a single injector between January 2020 and July 2022. All patients received initial treatment (typically ~0.3-0.5 mL of filler) and touch-up at 4-6 weeks (~0.1-0.3 mL). Safety data were collected throughout a mean follow-up of 11.1 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Nose and Satisfaction with Outcome questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 492 patients were included (984 treatment sessions including touch-ups). Of these, 467 (94.9%) were female and the mean age was 30.0 years. All treatments were associated with early transient edema; other adverse events included bruising (n = 123; 25%), residual asymmetry (n = 18; 3.7%), and suspected localized vascular occlusion (n = 3; 0.6%). The latter cases were easily resolved with hyaluronidase injection plus oral steroid and aspirin. No patients experienced infection, necrosis, blindness, lumps, granuloma, or delayed-onset nodules. Mean Rasch-transformed FACE-Q scores were 90.2% for Satisfaction with Nose and 99.2% for Satisfaction with Outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients treated in routine practice based on a systematic approach, nonsurgical rhinoplasty with VYC-25L was safe and effective.

The Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In cosmetic practices, non-surgical rhinoplasty using filler injections has become increasingly common. Nevertheless, the outcome and overall complications have not been studied as a systematic review in the literature. This study provides a high-quality systematic review of studies reporting clinical and patient-reported outcomes following non-surgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid (HA) to further guide practitioners.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The literature retrieval was conducted by three independent reviewers, and the remaining articles were screened by two independent reviewers. The quality of included articles was assessed using the MINORS and methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports tools.

RESULTS

A total of 874 publications were found based on the search criteria. A total of 3928 patients were reviewed for this systematic review from 23 full-text articles. For non-surgical rhinoplasty, Juvéderm ultra was the most commonly used HA filler. The nasal tip was most commonly injected (13 studies), followed by the columella (12 studies). Nasal hump deformities are the most common reason for non-surgical rhinoplasty. All studies showed high patient satisfaction. Among all patients reviewed, eight developed major complications.

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical rhinoplasty performed with HA has minimal side effects and a short recovery period. Furthermore, non-surgical rhinoplasty with HA results in high satisfaction. To strengthen the presently available evidence, further well-designed RCTs are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266.

Cocaine Nose Correction: A Nonsurgical Approach Using a Novel Hyaluronic Acid Filler

Background

The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for correcting nasal deformities offers an increasingly popular alternative to surgical rhinoplasty. However, this can sometimes be extremely challenging, for example, in patients with a permanent defect in the nasal septum secondary to chronic drug use.

Methods

We report a case in which nonsurgical intervention with a high G' HA filler was used therapeutically to improve the permanent nasal disfigurement of an individual with previous long-term drug use (now in remission).

Results

This approach led to high levels of patient satisfaction and empowerment in her personal and professional life. Despite the high risk in this case, only immediate minor complications were recorded, including temporary edema and ecchymoses, and these resolved spontaneously.

Conclusions

Nonsurgical treatment using an appropriate HA filler may offer a safe and effective option in selected patients with nasal deformities resulting from pathological conditions.

Displacement of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Mimicking a Cutaneous Tumor: A Case Report

There has been considerable growth in the number of cosmetic injectable procedures in recent years. Consequently, physicians in general are seeing a greater number of patients who have previously had cosmetic implants. These patients often fail to mention or do not admit to having had previous cosmetic procedures, conditions that should be noted in their medical histories. In this article, the authors report a rare case of hyaluronic acid filler displacement resulting from injection in the nasal radix region that had been administered 10 months prior, which the patient failed to mention. The filler migration mimicked facial tumors, entangling an otherwise easy case and it was only recognized with the use of dermatological ultrasound. This serves as a warning and a reminder to include complications from cosmetic procedures in diagnostic hypotheses. Physicians need to be vigilant, question their patients' medical histories, and be familiar with diagnostic imaging options. The presence of dermal fillers should always be considered in cutaneous tumor lesions, since they can last for months to years, or be present in locations distant from the site of application.

Five-point liquid rhinoplasty: Results from a retrospective analysis of a novel standardized technique and considerations on safety

BACKGROUND

Nonsurgical aesthetic improvement of the nose with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is becoming increasingly popular but comes with important safety considerations.

AIMS

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the standardized "five-point liquid rhinoplasty" approach.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing nonsurgical aesthetic treatment of the nose. All had one of the three main indications (insufficient nasal projection, nasal hump, or deep glabella) and were injected using HA fillers with high elastic modulus. Treatments were given using some or all of the injection points of the "five-point liquid rhinoplasty" technique: P1 (nasal tip, 0.2-0.3 ml supracartilaginous); P2 (nasal root, 0.1-0.2 ml supraperiostal); P3 (cartilaginous dorsum, 0.1-0.2 ml supracartilaginous/supraperiostal); P4 (subnasal, 0.1-0.2 ml supraperiostal); and P5 (nasal alar, 0.1-0.2 ml per side supraperiostal). The risk of complications was minimized by injecting deep and staying in the midline as far as possible.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled (n = 15 female [75%]; mean age: 37.8 ± 11.7 years). The mean volume of filler used was 0.66 ± 0.35 ml per patient. Nineteen subjects (95%) said they were "very satisfied" with results, and the physician was also "very satisfied" with outcomes in 19 patients (95%). Two individuals experienced hematoma, which was managed conservatively; there were no other significant complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The "five-point liquid rhinoplasty" is a simple and effective method designed to maximize safety. It offers a good alternative to surgery in selected patients.

An Italian Online Survey Regarding the Use of Hyaluronidase in Previously Hyaluronic Acid-Injected Noses Looking for Surgical Rhinoplasty

Background

Nonsurgical nasal reshaping (nSNR) with hyaluronic acid (HA) filler is a well-established procedure performed to ameliorate nasal appearance and is considered a valid alternative to surgical rhinoplasty in selected patients.

Objectives

The aim of our study is to evaluate the decision-making process and management of patients undergoing rhinoplasty, with previous HA filler injection, and evaluate if consensus could be achieved to recommend guidelines.

Methods

Between April and May 2021, an online survey was sent to 402 Italian surgeons of different specialties. The survey collected information regarding the types of treatment of patients who have previously undergone nSNR, who should undergo surgical rhinoplasty. For those surgeons using hyaluronidase, an additional information was collected.

Results

In a range of time of 2 months (April and May 2021), a total of 72 surgeons replied and completed the survey: out of the 402 questionnaires sent, the response rate was approximately 18%. The majority of respondents (61.5%) replied to inject hyaluronidase (HYAL) in patients who had to undergo a rhinoplasty but reported previous nSNR. Of the surgeons who use HYAL, 70% performed rhinoplasty after a waiting time of 3 to 4 weeks.

Conclusions

Either direct surgical approach or hyaluronidase injection first seems to be a viable options. The use of HYAL before surgery is the choice with the broadest consensus in our survey. However, a larger case-control study with long follow-ups is necessary to understand if in patient seeking surgical rhinoplasty who already received nSNR, the injection of hyaluronidase before surgery is mandatory, recommended, or not.

Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Follow-Up of High G' HA Nasal Injections

Rhinoplasty is one of the most requested aesthetic procedures performed by plastic surgeons world-wide and nonsurgical rhinoplasty is becoming the gold standard in aesthetic nasal treatment. Follow-up clinical examinations were performed on all 107 patients, being a safe and predictable technique with a high degree of satisfaction for the patients. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid is an effective, fast, and safe nasal reshaping procedure with a high degree of patient satisfaction. Generally, due to the gradual reabsorption of the filler, the results last up to 8 to 12 months after treatment, making it a valid minimally invasive alternative to surgical rhinoplasty. Consequently, to maintain the effects it is necessary to repeat the treatment once a year.

Effects of hyaluronic acid on the bone healing after lateral osteotomy: an experimental animal model

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative comfort of the patients undergoing rhinoplasty might be poor because of edema and ecchymosis caused by lateral osteotomy. In this animal experiment, we aimed at performing a quantitative assessment of effects of hyaluronic acid usage on healing process of lateral osteotomy.

METHODS

Fourteen New Zealand rabbits with a weight of 2000-2500 kg and an age of 8-12 weeks were included. Under anesthesia, nasal dorsums were exposed with midline incision and lateral osteotomies on both sides were performed using a 2 mm chisel. A hyaluronic acid-based mesh (Hyalonect^®) (1 × 1 cm) was embedded on the left osteotomy areas of all rabbits. Right osteotomy areas were left blank as control group. Collagen density and capillary development were quantitatively compared.

RESULTS

Convergence of fracture lines was observed in 6 (60%) of 10 samples from Hyalonect^® group, while was observed in 4 (40%) of 10 samples from control group. Although a higher rate of convergence was seen in the Hyalonect^® group (60% vs 40%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). Median collagen score was 2 (1-3) in the Hyalonect^® group and 1 (1-2) in the control group. Median capillary count value was 4 (1-23) in the Hyalonect^® group and 3 (1-17) in the control group. Both collagen score and capillary count values were significantly greater in the in the Hyalonect^® group compared with the control group (p = 0.023 and p = 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The effects of hyaluronic acid-based meshes on the bone healing process of the lateral osteotomy area might be investigated furthermore, on more comprehensive studies, as a material facilitating collagen organization and capillary development.

An expert consensus report on the clinical use of the Vycross® hyaluronic acid VYC-25 L filler

Background

The portfolio of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers and the techniques of administration have evolved in recent years. The latest innovation in the Vycross^® range was the introduction of VYC‐25L (Juvéderm Volux^®; Allergan plc), a first‐in‐class filler effective for chin and facial lower third remodeling. The aim here was to provide clinicians who are starting to use VYC‐25L with key advice, and to standardize procedures so that optimal and predictable outcomes can be obtained.

Methods

A multidisciplinary group of experts in esthetic medicine from Spain and Portugal reviewed the properties, treatment paradigms, administration techniques, and potential complications of VYC‐25L, on the basis of which they drafted consensus recommendations for its clinical use.

Results

The consensus panel provided specific recommendations focusing on the patient profile, dose, administration techniques, and the complications of VYC‐25L and their management. The panel identified five different profiles of patients who may benefit from VYC‐25L, and they drafted recommendations aimed to facilitate the treatment of these patients, namely, microgenia (women/men), masculinization (men), rejuvenation (women/men), facial laxity (women/men), and submental convexity (women/men). In terms of their safety, no specific recommendations were made beyond those established for other HA fillers.

Conclusions

The evolution of esthetic medicine makes it necessary to update the clinical recommendations that guide patient assessment and treatment with the new HA fillers developed. The current consensus document addresses relevant issues related to the use of VYC‐25L on different types of patient, in an attempt to standardize procedures and help specialists obtain predictable results.

Nonsurgical reshaping of the nose, chin, and jawline: A retrospective analysis using experience-based eligibility criteria

BACKGROUND

Nonsurgical reshaping of the nose, chin, and jawline with hyaluronic acid fillers is becoming increasingly popular. Appropriate patient selection is essential.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of nonsurgical treatment of these facial areas using experience-based eligibility criteria and injection of the high G' filler, VYC-25L.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing aesthetic improvement of the nose, chin, and/or jawline with VYC-25L, selected based on detailed criteria derived from extensive experience and imaging assessments. In a subgroup of subjects, high-resolution 3D imaging was used to assess nasal angles, nasal hump height, and chin projection.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included (n = 106 females; mean age, 43.4 ± 14.3 years; n = 44 nose treatment only, n = 24 chin/jawline only, n = 67 both). Mean treatment volume was 3.3 ± 2.0 ml. In total, 111 individuals (82.2%) were injected in the nose (mean volume: 0.9 ± 0.2 ml) and 91 (67.4%) in the chin/jawline (mean volume: 3.8 ± 0.8 ml). Most complications were injection site-related (bruising, n = 27 [20.0%]; pain, n = 1 [0.7%]). One patient (0.7%) experienced lip herpes, successfully managed with antiviral therapy. Thirty-two individuals underwent 3D imaging, which showed substantial mean changes from baseline in nasofrontal angle (3.5 ± 1.6 degrees), nasofacial angle (2.2 ± 0.8 degrees), and nasolabial angle (3.9 ± 2.6 degrees); decreases in nasal hump height (1.7 ± 0.9 mm); and increased chin projection (2.7 ± 1.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsurgical reshaping of the nose, chin, and jawline was safe and effective using experience-based eligibility criteria and VYC-25L.