The Role of Verteporfin in Prevention of Periprosthetic Capsular Fibrosis: An Experimental Study

Emerging biomedical technologies for scarless wound healing

Complete wound healing without scar formation has attracted increasing attention, prompting the development of various strategies to address this challenge. In clinical settings, there is a growing preference for emerging biomedical technologies that effectively manage fibrosis following skin injury, as they provide high efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and minimal side effects compared to invasive and costly surgical techniques. This review gives an overview of the latest developments in advanced biomedical technologies for scarless wound management. We first introduce the wound healing process and key mechanisms involved in scar formation. Subsequently, we explore common strategies for wound treatment, including their fabrication methods, superior performance and the latest research developments in this field. We then shift our focus to emerging biomedical technologies for scarless wound healing, detailing the mechanism of action, unique properties, and advanced practical applications of various biomedical technology-based therapies, such as cell therapy, drug therapy, biomaterial therapy, and synergistic therapy. Finally, we critically assess the shortcomings and potential applications of these biomedical technologies and therapeutic methods in the realm of scar treatment.

Critical Analysis of Cytoplasmic Progression of Inflammatory Signaling Suggests Potential Pharmacologic Targets for Wound Healing and Fibrotic Disorders

Successful skin wound healing is dependent on an interplay between epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts as they react to local extracellular factors (DAMPs, PAMPs, cytokines, etc.) surveyed from that environment by numerous membrane receptors (e.g., TLRs, cytokine receptors, etc.). In turn, those receptors are the start of a cytoplasmic signaling pathway where balance is key to effective healing and, as needed, cell and matrix regeneration. When directed through NF-κB, these signaling routes lead to transient responses to the benefit of initiating immune cell recruitment, cell replication, local chemokine and cytokine production, and matrix protein synthesis. The converse can also occur, where ongoing canonical NF-κB activation leads to chronic, hyper-responsive states. Here, we assess three key players, TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1, in cytoplasmic regulation of NF-κB activation, which, because of their distinctive and yet inter-related functions, either promote or limit that activation. Their balanced function is integral to successful wound healing, given their significant control over the expression of inflammation-, fibrosis-, and matrix remodeling-associated genes. Intriguingly, these three proteins have also been emphasized in dysregulated NF-κB signaling central to systemic sclerosis (SSc). Notably, diffuse SSc shares some tissue features similar to an excessive inflammatory/fibrotic wound response without eventual resolution. Taking a cue from certain instances of aberrant wound healing and SSc having some shared aspects, e.g., chronic inflammation and fibrosis, this review looks for the first time, to our knowledge, at what those pathologies might have in common regarding the cytoplasmic progression of NF-κB-mediated signaling. Additionally, while TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1 are often investigated and reported on individually, we propose them here as three proteins whose consequences of function are very highly interconnected at the signaling focus of NF-κB. We thus highlight the emerging promise for the eventual clinical benefit derived from an improved understanding of these integral signal progression modulators. Depending on the protein, its indirect or direct pharmacological regulation has been reported. Current findings support further intensive studies of these points in NF-κB regulation both for their basic function in healthy cells as well as with the goal of targeting them for translational benefit in multiple cutaneous wound healing situations, whether stemming from acute injury or a dysregulated inflammatory/fibrotic response.

Attenuating Chronic Fibrosis: Decreasing Foreign Body Response with Acellular Dermal Matrix

Surgical implants are increasingly used across multiple medical disciplines, with applications ranging from tissue reconstruction to improving compromised organ and limb function. Despite their significant potential for improving health and quality of life, biomaterial implant function is severely limited by the body's immune response to its presence: this is known as the foreign body response (FBR) and is characterized by chronic inflammation and fibrotic capsule formation. This response can result in life-threatening sequelae such as implant malfunction, superimposed infection, and associated vessel thrombosis, in addition to soft tissue disfigurement. Patients may require frequent medical visits, as well as repeated invasive procedures, increasing the burden on an already strained health care system. Currently, the FBR and the cells and molecular mechanisms that mediate it are poorly understood. With applications across a wide array of surgical specialties, acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has emerged as a potential solution to the fibrotic reaction seen with FBR. Although the mechanisms by which ADM decreases chronic fibrosis remain to be clearly characterized, animal studies across diverse surgical models point to its biomimetic properties that facilitate decreased periprosthetic inflammation and improved host cell incorporation. Impact Statement Foreign body response (FBR) is a significant limitation to the use of implantable biomaterials. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been observed to decrease the fibrotic reaction seen with FBR, although its mechanistic details are poorly understood. This review is dedicated to summarizing the primary literature on the biology of FBR in the context of ADM use, using surgical models in breast reconstruction, abdominal and chest wall repair, and pelvic reconstruction. This article will provide readers with an overarching review of shared mechanisms for ADM across multiple surgical models and diverse anatomical applications.