1
|
Self JL, Togunov RR, Edwards MA, Derocher AE. Influence of wind on movement behaviour in Arctic grizzly bears. Behav Processes 2025; 227:105177. [PMID: 40101809 DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/09/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
Odours are emitted from organic matter and can contain important information about an animal's surroundings, including the presence and location of other organisms. Wind acts as a conduit of olfactory information, affecting the spread and direction of odour dispersal across terrestrial landscapes. To increase the likelihood of detecting an odour molecule, individuals may exhibit anemotaxis - orientation bias to wind during movement - where the theoretical optimal olfactory search strategy is to move crosswind. We tested for biased movement relative to wind in Arctic grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) during the spring hypophagic period in the Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada using modelled winds and satellite-linked telemetry data (n = 12,430 locations) from 40 Arctic grizzly bears monitored between 2003 and 2010. Our results show that orientation relative to wind varied with movement rate, a proxy for active search effort. During steps where bears had high movement rates (> 90th percentile), bears predominantly oriented crosswind. We also found a positive relationship between movement rate and crosswind orientation: as bears moved faster, they increased their crosswind component of orientation. These results suggest an adaptive pattern of movement in response to wind, where bears oriented relative to the wind in a way that increased the likelihood of odour detection during active search. We suggest that future studies could include wind data in habitat selection and foraging models to examine its influence on habitat selection and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia L Self
- Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Ron R Togunov
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Gjærevoll Centre for Biodiversity Foresight Analyses, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mark A Edwards
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Andrew E Derocher
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cherif M, Brose U, Hirt MR, Ryser R, Silve V, Albert G, Arnott R, Berti E, Cirtwill A, Dyer A, Gauzens B, Gupta A, Ho HC, Portalier SMJ, Wain D, Wootton K. The environment to the rescue: can physics help predict predator-prey interactions? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2024; 99:1927-1947. [PMID: 38855988 DOI: 10.1111/brv.13105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Understanding the factors that determine the occurrence and strength of ecological interactions under specific abiotic and biotic conditions is fundamental since many aspects of ecological community stability and ecosystem functioning depend on patterns of interactions among species. Current approaches to mapping food webs are mostly based on traits, expert knowledge, experiments, and/or statistical inference. However, they do not offer clear mechanisms explaining how trophic interactions are affected by the interplay between organism characteristics and aspects of the physical environment, such as temperature, light intensity or viscosity. Hence, they cannot yet predict accurately how local food webs will respond to anthropogenic pressures, notably to climate change and species invasions. Herein, we propose a framework that synthesises recent developments in food-web theory, integrating body size and metabolism with the physical properties of ecosystems. We advocate for combination of the movement paradigm with a modular definition of the predation sequence, because movement is central to predator-prey interactions, and a generic, modular model is needed to describe all the possible variation in predator-prey interactions. Pending sufficient empirical and theoretical knowledge, our framework will help predict the food-web impacts of well-studied physical factors, such as temperature and oxygen availability, as well as less commonly considered variables such as wind, turbidity or electrical conductivity. An improved predictive capability will facilitate a better understanding of ecosystem responses to a changing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Cherif
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Global Change Research Unit, National Research Institute for Agriculture Food and the Environment, 50 avenue de Verdun, Cestas Cedex, 33612, France
| | - Ulrich Brose
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Myriam R Hirt
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Remo Ryser
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Violette Silve
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Global Change Research Unit, National Research Institute for Agriculture Food and the Environment, 50 avenue de Verdun, Cestas Cedex, 33612, France
| | - Georg Albert
- Department of Forest Nature Conservation, Georg-August-Universität, Büsgenweg 3, Göttingen, 37077, Germany
| | - Russell Arnott
- Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 47 Bateman Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1LR, UK
| | - Emilio Berti
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Alyssa Cirtwill
- Spatial Foodweb Ecology Group, Research Centre for Ecological Change (REC), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 3), Helsinki, 00014, Finland
| | - Alexander Dyer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Benoit Gauzens
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Anhubav Gupta
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zürich, 8057, Switzerland
| | - Hsi-Cheng Ho
- Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei, 106, Taiwan
| | - Sébastien M J Portalier
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa, STEM Complex, room 342, 150 Louis-Pasteur Pvt, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Danielle Wain
- 7 Lakes Alliance, Belgrade Lakes, 137 Main St, Belgrade Lakes, ME, 04918, USA
| | - Kate Wootton
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cuff JP, Labonte D, Windsor FM. Understanding Trophic Interactions in a Warming World by Bridging Foraging Ecology and Biomechanics with Network Science. Integr Comp Biol 2024; 64:306-321. [PMID: 38872009 PMCID: PMC11406160 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icae070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Climate change will disrupt biological processes at every scale. Ecosystem functions and services vital to ecological resilience are set to shift, with consequences for how we manage land, natural resources, and food systems. Increasing temperatures cause morphological shifts, with concomitant implications for biomechanical performance metrics crucial to trophic interactions. Biomechanical performance, such as maximum bite force or running speed, determines the breadth of resources accessible to consumers, the outcome of interspecific interactions, and thus the structure of ecological networks. Climate change-induced impacts to ecosystem services and resilience are therefore on the horizon, mediated by disruptions of biomechanical performance and, consequently, trophic interactions across whole ecosystems. Here, we argue that there is an urgent need to investigate the complex interactions between climate change, biomechanical traits, and foraging ecology to help predict changes to ecological networks and ecosystem functioning. We discuss how these seemingly disparate disciplines can be connected through network science. Using an ant-plant network as an example, we illustrate how different data types could be integrated to investigate the interaction between warming, bite force, and trophic interactions, and discuss what such an integration will achieve. It is our hope that this integrative framework will help to identify a viable means to elucidate previously intractable impacts of climate change, with effective predictive potential to guide management and mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan P Cuff
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| | - David Labonte
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wijers M, Trethowan P, du Preez B, Loveridge AJ, Markham A, Macdonald DW, Montgomery RA. Something in the wind: the influence of wind speed and direction on African lion movement behavior. Behav Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Olfaction is a key sense, enabling animals to locate forage, select mates, navigate their environment, and avoid predation. Wind is an important abiotic factor that modulates the strength of olfactory information detected by animals. In theory, when airflow is unidirectional, an animal can increase odor detection probability and maximize the amount of olfactory information gained by moving crosswind. Given energetic costs inherent to activity and locomotion, behavioral search strategies that optimize the benefit-cost ratio should be advantageous. We tested whether African lions (Panthera leo) modify their movement directionality and distance according to wind speed and direction during hours of darkness when they are most active. We tracked 29 lions in southern Zimbabwe using GPS collars and deployed a weather station to collect detailed abiotic data. We found that when wind speeds increased lions were more likely to move crosswind. We also found that female lions, which tend to hunt more often than males, traveled farther when wind speeds were stronger. The results of our analysis suggest that lions adjust their movement behavior according to wind speed and direction. We inferred that this was a behavioral decision to maximize the amount of olfactory information gained per unit of energy spent. Our findings not only offer one of the first detailed insights on large carnivore anemotaxis (movement direction relative to wind) but also make an important contribution towards understanding the influence of wind on predator ecology in general which remains understudied to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Wijers
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre , Abingdon Road, Tubney , United Kingdom
| | - Paul Trethowan
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre , Abingdon Road, Tubney , United Kingdom
| | - Byron du Preez
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre , Abingdon Road, Tubney , United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Loveridge
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre , Abingdon Road, Tubney , United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Markham
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford , Parks Road, Oxford , United Kingdom
| | - David W Macdonald
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre , Abingdon Road, Tubney , United Kingdom
| | - Robert A Montgomery
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre , Abingdon Road, Tubney , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|