A review: simulation tools for genome-wide interaction studies

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is essential for investigating the genetic basis of complex diseases; nevertheless, it usually ignores the interaction of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genome-wide interaction studies provide crucial means for exploring complex genetic interactions that GWAS may miss. Although many interaction methods have been proposed, challenges still persist, including the lack of epistasis models and the inconsistency of benchmark datasets. SNP data simulation is a pivotal intermediary between interaction methods and real applications. Therefore, it is important to obtain epistasis models and benchmark datasets by simulation tools, which is helpful for further improving interaction methods. At present, many simulation tools have been widely employed in the field of population genetics. According to their basic principles, these existing tools can be divided into four categories: coalescent simulation, forward-time simulation, resampling simulation, and other simulation frameworks. In this paper, their basic principles and representative simulation tools are compared and analyzed in detail. Additionally, this paper provides a discussion and summary of the advantages and disadvantages of these frameworks and tools, offering technical insights for the design of new methods, and serving as valuable reference tools for researchers to comprehensively understand GWAS and genome-wide interaction studies.

Designing interpretable deep learning applications for functional genomics: a quantitative analysis

Deep learning applications have had a profound impact on many scientific fields, including functional genomics. Deep learning models can learn complex interactions between and within omics data; however, interpreting and explaining these models can be challenging. Interpretability is essential not only to help progress our understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying traits and diseases but also for establishing trust in these model's efficacy for healthcare applications. Recognizing this importance, recent years have seen the development of numerous diverse interpretability strategies, making it increasingly difficult to navigate the field. In this review, we present a quantitative analysis of the challenges arising when designing interpretable deep learning solutions in functional genomics. We explore design choices related to the characteristics of genomics data, the neural network architectures applied, and strategies for interpretation. By quantifying the current state of the field with a predefined set of criteria, we find the most frequent solutions, highlight exceptional examples, and identify unexplored opportunities for developing interpretable deep learning models in genomics.

Cancer-inspired genomics mapper model for the generation of synthetic DNA sequences with desired genomics signatures

Genome data are crucial in modern medicine, offering significant potential for diagnosis and treatment. Thanks to technological advancements, many millions of healthy and diseased genomes have already been sequenced; however, obtaining the most suitable data for a specific study, and specifically for validation studies, remains challenging with respect to scale and access. Therefore, in silico genomics sequence generators have been proposed as a possible solution. However, the current generators produce inferior data using mostly shallow (stochastic) connections, detected with limited computational complexity in the training data. This means they do not take the appropriate biological relations and constraints, that originally caused the observed connections, into consideration. To address this issue, we propose cancer-inspired genomics mapper model (CGMM), that combines genetic algorithm (GA) and deep learning (DL) methods to tackle this challenge. CGMM mimics processes that generate genetic variations and mutations to transform readily available control genomes into genomes with the desired phenotypes. We demonstrate that CGMM can generate synthetic genomes of selected phenotypes such as ancestry and cancer that are indistinguishable from real genomes of such phenotypes, based on unsupervised clustering. Our results show that CGMM outperforms four current state-of-the-art genomics generators on two different tasks, suggesting that CGMM will be suitable for a wide range of purposes in genomic medicine, especially for much-needed validation studies.

EpiReSIM: A Resampling Method of Epistatic Model without Marginal Effects Using Under-Determined System of Equations

Simulation experiments are essential to evaluate epistasis detection methods, which is the main way to prove their effectiveness and move toward practical applications. However, due to the lack of effective simulators, especially for simulating models without marginal effects (eNME models), epistasis detection methods can hardly verify their effectiveness through simulation experiments. In this study, we propose a resampling simulation method (EpiReSIM) for generating the eNME model. First, EpiReSIM provides two strategies for solving eNME models. One is to calculate eNME models using prevalence constraints, and another is by joint constraints of prevalence and heritability. We transform the computation of the model into the problem of solving the under-determined system of equations. Introducing the complete orthogonal decomposition method and Newton's method, EpiReSIM calculates the solution of the underdetermined system of equations to obtain the eNME model, especially the solution of the high-order model, which is the highlight of EpiReSIM. Second, based on the computed eNME model, EpiReSIM generates simulation data by a resampling method. Experimental results show that EpiReSIM has advantages in preserving the biological properties of minor allele frequencies and calculating high-order models, and it is a convenient and effective alternative method for current simulation software.

Multiple dynamic models reveal the genetic architecture for growth in height of Catalpa bungei in the field

Growth in height (GH) is a critical determinant for tree survival and development in forests and can be depicted using logistic growth curves. Our understanding of the genetic mechanism underlying dynamic GH, however, is limited, particularly under field conditions. We applied two mapping models (Funmap and FVTmap) to find quantitative trait loci responsible for dynamic GH and two epistatic models (2HiGWAS and 1HiGWAS) to detect epistasis in Catalpa bungei grown in the field. We identified 13 co-located quantitative trait loci influencing the growth curve by Funmap and three heterochronic parameters (the timing of the inflection point, maximum acceleration and maximum deceleration) by FVTmap. The combined use of FVTmap and Funmap reduced the number of candidate genes by >70%. We detected 76 significant epistatic interactions, amongst which a key gene, COMT14, co-located by three models (but not 1HiGWAS) interacted with three other genes, implying that a novel network of protein interaction centered on COMT14 may control the dynamic GH of C. bungei. These findings provide new insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying the dynamic growth in tree height in natural environments and emphasize the necessity of incorporating multiple dynamic models for screening more reliable candidate genes.

Evaluating the detection ability of a range of epistasis detection methods on simulated data for pure and impure epistatic models

Background

Numerous approaches have been proposed for the detection of epistatic interactions within GWAS datasets in order to better understand the drivers of disease and genetics.

Methods

A selection of state-of-the-art approaches were assessed. These included the statistical tests, fast-epistasis, BOOST, logistic regression and wtest; swarm intelligence methods, namely AntEpiSeeker, epiACO and CINOEDV; and data mining approaches, including MDR, GSS, SNPRuler and MPI3SNP. Data were simulated to provide randomly generated models with no individual main effects at different heritabilities (pure epistasis) as well as models based on penetrance tables with some main effects (impure epistasis). Detection of both two and three locus interactions were assessed across a total of 1,560 simulated datasets. The different methods were also applied to a section of the UK biobank cohort for Atrial Fibrillation.

Results

For pure, two locus interactions, PLINK’s implementation of BOOST recovered the highest number of correct interactions, with 53.9% and significantly better performing than the other methods (p = 4.52e − 36). For impure two locus interactions, MDR exhibited the best performance, recovering 62.2% of the most significant impure epistatic interactions (p = 6.31e − 90 for all but one test). The assessment of three locus interaction prediction revealed that wtest recovered the highest number (17.2%) of pure epistatic interactions(p = 8.49e − 14). wtest also recovered the highest number of three locus impure epistatic interactions (p = 6.76e − 48) while AntEpiSeeker ranked as the most significant the highest number of such interactions (40.5%). Finally, when applied to a real dataset for Atrial Fibrillation, most notably finding an interaction between SYNE2 and DTNB.

A framework for modeling epistatic interaction

MOTIVATION

Recently, various tools for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in epistasis have been developed. However, no studies evaluate the employed statistical epistasis models such as the χ2-test or quadratic regression independently of the tools that use them. Such an independent evaluation is crucial for developing improved epistasis detection tools, for it allows to decide if a tool's performance should be attributed to the epistasis model or to the optimization strategy run on top of it.

RESULTS

We present a protocol for evaluating epistasis models independently of the tools they are used in and generalize existing models designed for dichotomous phenotypes to the categorical and quantitative case. In addition, we propose a new model which scores candidate SNP sets by computing maximum likelihood distributions for the observed phenotypes in the cells of their penetrance tables. Extensive experiments show that the proposed maximum likelihood model outperforms three widely used epistasis models in most cases. The experiments also provide valuable insights into the properties of existing models, for instance, that quadratic regression perform particularly well on instances with quantitative phenotypes.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

The evaluation protocol and all compared models are implemented in C++ and are supported under Linux and macOS. They are available at https://github.com/baumbachlab/genepiseeker/, along with test datasets and scripts to reproduce the experiments.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.