Effect of peripheral morphine in a human model of acute inflammatory pain

Methodology and applicability of the human contact burn injury model: A systematic review

The contact burn injury model is an experimental contact thermode-based physiological pain model primarily applied in research of drug efficacy in humans. The employment of the contact burn injury model across studies has been inconsistent regarding essential methodological variables, challenging the validity of the model. This systematic review analyzes methodologies, outcomes, and research applications of the contact burn injury model. Based on these results, we propose an improved contact burn injury testing paradigm. A literature search was conducted (15-JUL-2020) using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Sixty-four studies were included. The contact burn injury model induced consistent levels of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. However, the analyses revealed variations in the methodology of the contact burn injury heating paradigm and the post-burn application of test stimuli. The contact burn injury model had limited testing sensitivity in demonstrating analgesic efficacy. There was a weak correlation between experimental and clinical pain intensity variables. The data analysis was limited by the methodological heterogenicity of the different studies and a high risk of bias across the studies. In conclusion, although the contact burn injury model provides robust hyperalgesia, it has limited efficacy in testing analgesic drug response. Recommendations for future use of the model are being provided, but further research is needed to improve the sensitivity of the contact burn injury method. The protocol for this review has been published in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019133734).

Human surrogate models of central sensitization: A critical review and practical guide

Background

As in other fields of medicine, development of new medications for management of neuropathic pain has been difficult since preclinical rodent models do not necessarily translate to the clinics. Aside from ongoing pain with burning or shock‐like qualities, neuropathic pain is often characterized by pain hypersensitivity (hyperalgesia and allodynia), most often towards mechanical stimuli, reflecting sensitization of neural transmission.

Data treatment

We therefore performed a systematic literature review (PubMed‐Medline, Cochrane, WoS, ClinicalTrials) and semi‐quantitative meta‐analysis of human pain models that aim to induce central sensitization, and generate hyperalgesia surrounding a real or simulated injury.

Results

From an initial set of 1569 reports, we identified and analysed 269 studies using more than a dozen human models of sensitization. Five of these models (intradermal or topical capsaicin, low‐ or high‐frequency electrical stimulation, thermode‐induced heat‐injury) were found to reliably induce secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick and have been implemented in multiple laboratories. The ability of these models to induce dynamic mechanical allodynia was however substantially lower. The proportion of subjects who developed hypersensitivity was rarely provided, giving rise to significant reporting bias. In four of these models pharmacological profiles allowed to verify similarity to some clinical conditions, and therefore may inform basic research for new drug development.

Conclusions

While there is no single “optimal” model of central sensitization, the range of validated and easy‐to‐use procedures in humans should be able to inform preclinical researchers on helpful potential biomarkers, thereby narrowing the translation gap between basic and clinical data.

Significance

Being able to mimic aspects of pathological pain directly in humans has a huge potential to understand pathophysiology and provide animal research with translatable biomarkers for drug development. One group of human surrogate models has proven to have excellent predictive validity: they respond to clinically active medications and do not respond to clinically inactive medications, including some that worked in animals but failed in the clinics. They should therefore inform basic research for new drug development.

Morphine Antinociception Restored by Use of Methadone in the Morphine-Resistant Inflammatory Pain State

The antinociceptive effect of methadone in the morphine-resistant inflammatory pain state was described in the paw-withdrawal test using the complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-induced mouse inflammatory pain model. After intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of CFA, thermal hyperalgesia was observed in the ipsilateral paw. The antinociceptive effects of subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone against thermal hyperalgesia in the inflammatory pain state were reduced in the ipsilateral paw 7 days after CFA pretreatment. On the contrary, the antinociceptive effect of s.c. injection of methadone was maintained in the ipsilateral paw 7 days after CFA pretreatment. The suppressed morphine antinociception in the CFA model mice was bilaterally restored following s.c. treatment with methadone 20 min prior to or 3 days after CFA pretreatment. The suppressed morphine antinociception was also bilaterally restored by intraperitoneal treatment with MK-801 30 min prior to CFA pretreatment; however, the s.c. injection of morphine 30 min prior to CFA pretreatment failed to restore the suppressed morphine antinociception in the CFA model mice. The expression level of mRNA for µ-opioid receptors 7 days after i.pl. pretreatment was not significantly changed by i.pl. pretreatment with CFA or s.c. pretreatment with methadone. In conclusion, methadone is extremely effective against thermal hyperalgesia in the morphine-resistant inflammatory pain state, and restores suppressed morphine antinociception in the inflammatory pain state without altering the expression level of mRNA for µ-opioid receptors.

Comparison of the peripheral antinociceptive effect of somatostatin with bupivacaine and morphine in the rodent postoperative pain model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Infiltration of surgical wound with local anaesthetics attenuate postoperative pain. However, side effects can also occur. Somatostatin (SST) and its analogues like octreotide reportedly reduce peripheral sensitisation. The current study evaluates peripherally mediated antinociceptive effect of SST in a rat model of postoperative pain. This was compared with bupivacaine and morphine under identical experimental conditions.

DESIGN

Randomised vehicle-controlled blind study.

SETTING

Pain research laboratory, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from February 2014 to July 2017.

EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECT

Rodent hind paw incision model.

INTERVENTIONS

Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to incision and one of the following drugs administered into the open wound once by a micropipette: SST (10, 30 or 100 μg), bupivacaine (3, 10, 30, 50 or 100 μg) or morphine (100 μg). Antinociceptive effect of SST was further evaluated for its reversibility, site of action, effect on spinal c-fos expression and blood glucose level. The site of action of morphine was also investigated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Nociception was estimated by nonevoked (guarding behaviour) and evoked (mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia) pain behaviours between 2 h and days 4 to 7.

RESULTS

Nociception was maximum 2 h after incision. SST (10 to 100 μg) significantly attenuated guarding behaviour between 2 h and day 2. A delayed inhibitory effect was observed on allodynia. Bupivacaine (10 to 100 μg doses) similarly decreased guarding score up to day 2 though evoked pain behaviours were relatively unaffected. In contrast, morphine produced a potent but transient inhibitory effect on guarding score at 2 h, which was mediated by both peripheral and central opioid receptors. The antinociceptive effect of SST was peripherally mediated by type 2 receptors and was associated with decreased c-fos staining. Blood glucose level was unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Guarding behaviour, which likely represents pain-at-rest following surgery, was attenuated by both bupivacaine and SST to comparable extents. This novel peripherally mediated antinociceptive effect of SST needs further evaluation.

Peripheral Neuropathy and Nerve Compression Syndromes in Burns

Peripheral neuropathy and nerve compression syndromes lead to substantial morbidity following burn injury. Patients present with pain, paresthesias, or weakness along a specific nerve distribution or experience generalized peripheral neuropathy. The symptoms manifest at various times from within one week of hospitalization to many months after wound closure. Peripheral neuropathy may be caused by vascular occlusion of vasa nervorum, inflammation, neurotoxin production leading to apoptosis, and direct destruction of nerves from the burn injury. This article discusses the natural history, diagnosis, current treatments, and future directions for potential interventions for peripheral neuropathy and nerve compression syndromes related to burn injury.

A literature review on the pharmacological sensitivity of human evoked hyperalgesia pain models

AIMS

Human evoked pain models can be used to determine the efficacy of new and existing analgesics and to aid in the identification of new targets. Aspects of neuropathic pain can be simulated by inducing hyperalgesia resulting from provoked sensitization. The present literature review aimed to provide insight into the sensitivity of different hyperalgesia and allodynia models of pharmacological treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that included human hyperalgesia pain models and investigated the pharmacodynamic effects of different classes of drugs.

RESULTS

Three hyperalgesia models [ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation, capsaicin and thermode burn] have been used extensively. Assessment of hyperalgesia/allodynia and pharmacological effect are measured using challenge tests, which generally comprise thermal (heat/cold) or mechanical stimulation (pin-prick, stroking or impact). The UVB model was sensitive to the antihyperalgesic effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. The capsaicin model was partially sensitive to opioids. The burn model did not detect any antihyperalgesic effects when NSAIDs or local anaesthetics were administered but responded to the effects of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists by moderately reducing mechanical hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on pharmacological sensitivity, the UVB model adequately reflects inflammatory pain and was sensitive to NSAIDs and opioids. Findings from the capsaicin and burn models raised questions about the translatability of these models to the treatment of neuropathic pain. There is a need for a reproducible and predictive model of neuropathic pain, either in healthy subjects or in patients.

Progress of clinical practice on the management of burn-associated pain: Lessons from animal models

Opioid-based analgesics provide the mainstay for attenuating burn pain, but they have a myriad of side effects including respiratory depression, nausea, impaired gastrointestinal motility, sedation, dependence, physiologic tolerance, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. To test and develop novel analgesics, validated burn-relevant animal models of pain are indispensable. Herein we review such animal models, which are mostly limited to rodent models of burn-induced, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain. The latter two are pain syndromes that provide insight into the pain caused by systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines and direct injury to nerves (e.g., after severe burn), respectively. To date, no single animal model optimally mimics the complex pathophysiology and pain that a human burn patient experiences. No currently available burn-pain model examines effects of pharmacological intervention on wound healing. As cornerstones of pain and wound healing, pro-inflammatory mediators may be utilized for insight into both processes. Moreover, common clinical concerns such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction remain unaddressed. For development of analgesics, these aberrations can significantly alter the potential efficacy and/or adverse effects of a prescribed analgesic following burn trauma. We therefore suggest that a multi-model strategy would be the most clinically relevant when evaluating novel analgesics for use in burn patients.

Demarcation of secondary hyperalgesia zones: Punctate stimulation pressure matters

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperalgesia is increased sensitivity in normal tissue near an injury, and it is a measure of central sensitization reflecting injury-related effects on the CNS. Secondary hyperalgesia areas (SHAs), usually assessed by polyamide monofilaments, are important outcomes in studies of analgesic drug effects in humans. However, since the methods applied in demarcating the secondary hyperalgesia zone seem inconsistent across studies, we examined the effect of a standardized approach upon the measurement of SHA following a first degree burn injury (BI).

NEW METHOD

The study was a two-observer, test-retest study with the two sessions separated by 6wk. An observer-blinded design adjusted to examine day-to-day and observer-to-observer variability in SHA was used. In 23 healthy volunteers (12 females/11 males) a BI was induced by a contact thermode (47.0°C, 420s, 2.5×5.0cm(2)). The SHA, demarcated by polyamide monofilaments (bending force: 0.2, 69 and 2569mN) and a "weighted-pin" stimulator (512mN), were assessed 45 to 75min after each BI.

RESULTS

A random effect, linear mixed model demonstrated a logarithmic correlation between elicited skin pressures (mN/mm(2)) and the SHAs (P<0.0001). No day-to-day or observer-to-observer differences in SHAs were observed. Intraclass correlation coefficients, in the range of 0.51 to 0.84, indicated a moderate to almost perfect reliability between observers.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

No standardized approach in SHA-assessment has hitherto been presented.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate that demarcation of secondary hyperalgesia zones depends on the developed pressure of the punctate stimulator used.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy attenuates central sensitization induced by a thermal injury in humans

BACKGROUND

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2 ) treatment has in animal experiments demonstrated antinociceptive effects. It was hypothesized that these effects would attenuate secondary hyperalgesia areas (SHAs), an expression of central sensitization, after a first-degree thermal injury in humans.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy volunteers were examined during two sessions using a randomized crossover design. Volunteers were studied during control conditions (ambient pressure, FI O2  = 0.21) and during HBO2 (2.4 standard atmosphere, FI O2  = 1.0, 90 min) conditions in a pressure chamber. Quantitative sensory testing, including assessment of SHAs was performed.

RESULTS

A statistically significant overall attenuation of SHAs was seen during the HBO2 sessions compared with the control-sessions (P = 0.011). In the eight volunteers starting with the HBO2 session, no difference in SHAs compared with control was demonstrated. However, in the nine volunteers starting with the control session, a statistical significant attenuation of SHAs was demonstrated in the HBO2 session (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that HBO2 therapy in humans attenuates central sensitization induced by a thermal skin injury, compared with control. These new and original findings in humans corroborate animal experimental data. The thermal injury model may give impetus to future human neurophysiological studies exploring the central effects of hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

Cannabinoid receptor type 1 antagonist, AM251, attenuates mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia after burn injury

BACKGROUND

Burn injury causes nociceptive behaviors, and inflammation-related pathologic pain can lead to glial cell activation. This study tested the hypothesis that burn injury activates glial cells, and cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) antagonist, AM251, will decrease burn pain.

METHODS

Anesthetized rats received 0.75-cm third-degree burn on dorsal hind paw. Vehicle or AM251 30 μg intrathecally (older rats, n=6 per group) or, either vehicle, 0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg intraperitoneally (younger rats, n=6 per group), started immediate postburn, was administered for 7 days. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were tested on ventral paw for 14 days. Microglial and astroglial activity was assessed by immunocytochemistry.

RESULTS

Allodynia, observed on burn side from day 1 to 14, was significantly (P<0.05) attenuated by intrathecal and intraperitoneal AM251 (1 mg/kg) starting from 3 to 14 days. Hyperalgesia, observed from day 3 to 12, was completely (P<0.05) reversed by intrathecal and intraperitoneal AM251 (1 mg/kg). AM251 0.1 mg/kg had no effect. Microglial activity (n=3 per time point) increased (P<0.05) 18.5±7.5 and 12.3±1.6 (mean±SD) fold at 7 and 14 days, respectively. Astroglial activity (n=4 per time point) increased 2.9±0.3 fold at day 7 only. Glial activities were unaltered by AM251.

CONCLUSIONS

AM251 inhibited nociceptive behaviors after burn even beyond 7-day period of administration. Although many studies have documented the utility of CB1R agonists, this study indicates that endogenous cannabinoids may have an unexpected pronociceptive effect during development of burn pain, explaining why CB1R antagonist, AM251, improves nociceptive behaviors. The decreased nociception with AM251 without altering glial activity indicates that AM251 acts further downstream of activated glial cells.

Morphine- and buprenorphine-induced analgesia and antihyperalgesia in a human inflammatory pain model: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-arm crossover study

PURPOSE

Opioid therapy is associated with the development of tolerance and paradoxically increased sensitivity to pain. It has been suggested that buprenorphine is associated with a higher antihyperalgesia/analgesia ratio than μ-opioid receptor agonists. The primary outcome of this study was therefore to investigate relative differences in antihyperalgesia and analgesia effects between morphine and buprenorphine in an inflammatory pain model in volunteers. The secondary outcome was to examine the relationship between pain sensitivity and opioid-induced effects on analgesia, antihyperalgesia, and descending pain modulation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight healthy subjects were included. The study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-arm crossover study with a multimodal (electrical, mechanical, and thermal stimuli) testing technique. After baseline assessments, intravenous infusions of morphine (10/20 mg), buprenorphine (0.3/0.6 mg), or placebo (normal saline) were administered over a 210-minute period, during which a cold pressor test, heat injury (47°C, 7 minutes, 12.5 cm(2)), and the first postburn assessment were done. After completion of the drug infusions, two additional postburn assessments were done. The subjects were monitored during each 8-hour session by an anesthesiologist.

RESULTS

For nearly all tested variables, significant dose-dependent analgesic effects were demonstrated. The median antihyperalgesia/analgesia ratio (secondary hyperalgesia/heat injury relative to placebo) for low-dose morphine was 0.01 (interquartile range: -6.2; 9.9), 0.00 (-2.4; 2.1) for high-dose morphine, 0.03 (-1.8; 2.1) for low-dose buprenorphine, and 0.00 (-3.2; 1.1) for high-dose buprenorphine (P > 0.466). There were no significant differences in opioid responses between high and low pain-sensitive subjects (P > 0.286). High-dose buprenorphine, compared to placebo, was associated with a significantly enhanced action of the descending inhibitory pain control system (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The present study, using multimodal testing technique, could not demonstrate any significant differences between morphine and buprenorphine in the profiles of antihyperalgesia and analgesia. Only high-dose buprenorphine was associated with a significant effect on the descending inhibitory pain control system.

Role of opioid receptors in the reduction of formalin-induced secondary allodynia and hyperalgesia in rats

This study assesses the effects of peripheral or intrathecal pre-treatment or post-treatment with micro, delta, kappa and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) opioid receptor agonists (morphine, U-50488 [trans-(+/-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide hydrochloride], DADLE [D-Ala2-Leu5-enkephalin] and nociceptin, respectively) on formalin-induced secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia in rats. 1% Formalin injection produced acute nociceptive behaviors (flinching and licking/lifting) followed by long-term tactile secondary allodynia and hyperalgesia. Neither peripheral (into the formalin-injected paw) nor intrathecal morphine post-treatment reversed formalin-induced secondary allodynia and hyperalgesia. In contrast, morphine pre-treatment prevented the development of these pain behaviors. Intrathecal and peripheral post- but not pre-treatment with U-50488 or DADLE significantly reduced secondary allodynia and hyperalgesia. Interestingly, nociceptin reduced both pain behaviors regardless of the administration site or treatment time. Local antinociceptive effects of morphine, DADLE, U-50488 or nociceptin were blocked by naltrexone, naltrindole, 5-guanidinonaltrindole and [Nphe(1)]nociceptin(1-13)NH(2), respectively. These results suggest that the long-term nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin are differentially modulated by selective opioid receptor agonists. In addition, data suggest that peripheral and spinal delta and kappa opioid receptors are important when nociceptive behaviors are established. In contrast, micro opioid receptors are more important at the beginning of the injury when the sensory system has not changed. NOP receptors participate diminishing both the development and maintenance of nociceptive behaviors. Results suggest that a barrage of afferent input induced by formalin injection initiates a long-term differential change in peripheral and spinal processing that affect the efficacy of opioid receptor agonists.

Morphine bioavailability from a topical gel formulation in volunteers

Although available therapies provide relief to many patients with cancer-related pain, swallowing difficulties or intestinal obstruction may preclude oral analgesic delivery in some. Topical morphine might provide an alternate delivery form but morphine bioavailability from a topical gel formulation has not been reported in humans. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study of five volunteers after they provided institutionally-approved, written, informed consent. They were admitted to the Northwestern University General Clinical Research Center twice, being randomly assigned to receive either 1mL of morphine compounded at 10mg/mL in pluronic lecithin organogel (PLO) base applied to the wrist and 1mL of normal saline administered subcutaneously, or 1mL of topical drug-free PLO base and 1mL of subcutaneous morphine, 3mg/mL, the first time and the opposite combination the second. Seventeen blood samples were collected from 5minutes to 10hours after dose administration for morphine concentration determination. Plasma samples were prepared by solid-phase extraction and morphine concentrations measured by a mass spectrometric technique with a linear range of 0.5-500ng/mL. Bioavailability of the topical formulation relative to the subcutaneous dose was to be estimated from doses and the plasma morphine concentration versus time relationships. Because morphine was seldom detected in plasma samples after topical administration and was unquantifiable when it was, the low bioavailability of topical morphine was unquantifiable. These results suggest that topical administration of morphine compounded in a PLO base for transdermal drug delivery is unlikely to provide relief of cancer-related pain.

Palliative management of pressure ulcers and malignant wounds in patients with advanced illness

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers and malignant wounds are prevalent in populations with advanced illness. In these populations, the goals of care may shift from a primary focus on healing to a focus on wound management, palliation and comfort. Many complications associated with these wounds must be palliated.

OBJECTIVE

This review explores the palliative approach to managing pressure ulcers and malignant wounds in patients with advanced illness.

DESIGN

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Databases for articles addressing wound management and palliation was performed. We also reviewed online wound care resources and textbooks related to the field.

CONCLUSIONS

The key to good wound care is prevention if possible, ongoing wound assessment, correct choice of dressing and use of available adjuvant therapies. The ultimate goals of palliative wound care are to control pain, to manage infection, odor, bleeding, and exudate, and to maintain a good quality of life for the patient and caregiver.

[Potential applications and significance of peripheral opioid analgesia]

Recently, the local application of analgesic substances has attracted much interest and has become increasingly relevant in daily clinical practice. The lack of the well-known therapy-limiting central side effects of systemically administered opioids is a clear advantage of "peripheral opioid analgesia". Important prerequisites for the occurrence of peripheral analgesic effects of opioids are good accessibility of the painful site, presence of clinically relevant pain, signs of a local inflammation, exclusion of a fast systemic absorption, and adequately potent analgesic substances. This review gives an outline of recent experience with various clinical applications of "peripheral opioid analgesia".

Peripheral opioid analgesia: Clinical applications

Peripheral opioid analgesia is undoubtedly of clinical relevance, especially considering that systemic opioid therapy often is hampered by central side effects. Despite some clinical studies that do not show peripheral opioid-mediated pain control, mostly because of methodologic shortcomings, studies evaluating inflammatory pain conditions show clear evidence and the number and the sites of applications are increasing. The intention of this paper is to give insight into the recent experience with the clinical applications of peripheral opioid analgesia.

Peripherally restricted opioid drugs: advances and retreats

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to familiarize anesthesiologists with recent research investigating peripheral opioid analgesia. The review focuses on studies of peripheral receptor distribution in humans and clinical data that support the hypothesis of peripheral analgesia that have been published over the past 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent anatomical studies using human tissue have detected the presence of mu-opioid receptors in epidermal and dermal layers of normal skin, although expression was not altered in certain dermal clinical conditions. Nerve fibers of human dental pulp also contained detectable mu-opioid receptors. A survey of the clinical literature on peripherally mediated mu analgesia suggests that under conditions of inflammation, the onset of analgesia is typically delayed, but once initiated, is of long duration. A peripherally selective kappa agonist was efficacious in relieving the pain associated with chronic pancreatitis.

SUMMARY

Peripheral analgesia mediated through the mu-opioid receptor has been demonstrated in a variety of clinical settings, with the preponderance of data generated with arthroscopic procedures. Receptor localization studies using human tissue have corroborated the presence of the mu-opioid receptor in the periphery. Future research is needed to investigate the clinical utility of kappa and delta-opioid receptor agonists in the peripheral setting.

A comparison of the pharmacological modulation of hyperalgesia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

It has been proposed that there may be similarities in the mechanisms contributing toward hyperalgesia/allodynia observed in various clinical pain syndromes and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in asthma. Both features are characterized by an increase in responsivity to various stimuli. In the case of pain, these include increase in responsiveness to mechanical and thermal stimuli whilst asthmatics bronchoconstrict in response to substances that are otherwise innocuous. A variety of mediators can induce hyperalgesia and pain when injected into the skin and these same mediators are also released during an inflammatory insult in the airways and in many cases can induce hyperresponsiveness experimentally. In this review, a comparison of the pharmacological modulation of afferent activity in hyperalgesia and in BHR will be made to ascertain whether any commonality exists between the treatment of these two disease states.