Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique

A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques

BACKGROUND

Significant hemodynamic changes occur during liver transplantation, emphasizing the importance of precious and continuous monitoring of cardiac output, cardiac index, and other parameters. Although the monitoring of cardiac output by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) was statistically homogeneous compared to the clinical gold standard pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in previous studies of liver transplantation, there are fewer statistical methods for the assessment of its conclusions, and a lack of comparisons of other hemodynamic parameters (e.g., SVRI, systemic vascular resistance index). Some studies have also concluded that the agreement between PiCCO and PAC is not good enough. Overall, there are no uniform conclusions regarding the agreement between PiCCO and PAC in previous studies. This study evaluates the agreement and trending ability of relevant hemodynamic parameters obtained with PiCCO compared to the clinical gold standard PAC from multiple perspectives, employing various statistical methods.

METHODS

Fifty-two liver transplantation patients were included. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), SVRI and stroke volume index (SVI) values were monitored at eight time points using both PiCCO and PAC. The results were analyzed by Bland-Altman analysis, Passing-bablok regression, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), 4-quadrant plot, polar plot, and trend interchangeability method (TIM).

RESULTS

The Bland-Altman analysis revealed high percentage errors for PiCCO: 54.06% for CO, 52.70% for CI, 62.18% for SVRI, and 51.97% for SVI, indicating poor accuracy. While Passing-Bablok plots showed favorable agreement for SVRI overall and during various phases, the agreement for other parameters was less satisfactory. The ICC results confirmed good overall agreement between the two devices across most parameters, except for SVRI during the new liver phase, which showed poor agreement. Additionally, four-quadrant and polar plot analyses indicated that all agreement rate values fell below the clinically acceptable threshold of over 90%, and all angular deviation values exceeded ± 5°, demonstrating that PiCCO is unable to meet the acceptable trends. Using the TIM, the interchangeability rates were found to be quite low: 20% for CO and CI, 16% for SVRI, and 13% for SVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed notable disparities in absolute values of CO, CI, SVRI and SVI between PiCCO and PAC in intraoperative liver transplant settings, notably during the neohepatic phase where errors were particularly pronounced. Consequently, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration of PiCCO's advantages and disadvantages in liver transplantation scenarios, including its multiple parameters (such as the encompassing extravascular lung water index), against its limited correlation with PAC.

What is the optimal anesthetic monitoring regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation?-A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant centers vary in approach to intraoperative vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and temperature management. Evidence is limited regarding impact of selected modalities on postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and provide expert panel recommendations on optimal intraoperative arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and intraoperative temperature management regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT).

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Recommendations made for: (1) Vascular accesses, arterial BP and CVP monitoring, (2) cardiac function monitoring, and (3) Intraoperative temperature management (CRD42021239908).

RESULTS

Of 2619 articles screened 16 were included. Studies were small, retrospective, and observational. Vascular access studies demonstrated low rates of insertion complications. TEE studies demonstrated low rates of esophageal hemorrhage. One study found lower hospital-LOS and 30-day mortality in patients monitored with both PAC and TEE. Other monitoring studies were heterogenous in design and outcomes. Temperature studies showed increased blood transfusion and ventilation times in hypothermic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations were made for; routine arterial and CVP monitoring as a minimum standard of practice, consideration of discrepancy between peripheral and central arterial BP in patients with hemodynamic instability and high vasopressor requirements, and routine use of high flow cannulae while monitoring for extravasation and hematoma formation. Availability and expertise in PAC and/or TEE monitoring is strongly recommended particularly in hemodynamic instability, portopulmonary HT and/or cardiac dysfunction. TEE use is recommended as an acceptable risk in patients with treated esophageal varices and is an effective diagnostic tool for emergency cardiovascular collapse. Maintenance of intraoperative normothermia is strongly recommended.

Systemic acidemia impairs cardiac function in critically Ill patients

BACKGROUND

Acidemia, is associated with reduced cardiac function in animals, but no studies showing an effect of acidemia on cardiac function in humans are reported. In the present study, we examined the effect of acidemia on cardiac function assessed with transpulmonary thermodilution technique with integrated pulse contour analysis (Pulse Contour Cardiac Output, PiCCO™) in a large cohort of critically ill patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective multicenter observational cross-sectional study of 297 patients from 6 intensive care units in London, England selected from all patients admitted consecutively between May 2018 and March 2019. Measurements of lowest plasma pH and concurrent assessment of cardiac function were obtained.

FINDINGS

There was a significant difference between two pH categories (pH ≤ 7.28 vs. pH > 7.28) for the following variables of cardiac function: SVI (difference in means 32.7; 95% CI: 21 to 45 mL/m2; p < 0.001); GEF (18; 95% CI: 11 to 26%; p < 0.001), dPmax (-331; 95% CI: -510 to -153 mmHg/s; p = 0.001), CFI (0.7; 95% CI: 0.2 to 1.3 1/min; p = 0.01) and CPI (0.09; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.15 W/m2; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in CI (0.13; 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.47 L/min/m2; p = 0.12) between the pH categories. Also, a significant relationship was found between the quantitative pH and the following variables: SVI (132; 95% CI: 77 to 188 mL/m2; p < 0.001), GEF (74.7; 95% CI: 37.1 to 112.4%; p < 0.001), dPmax (-1587; 95% CI: -2361 to -815 mmHg/s; p < 0.001), CFI (3.5; 95% CI: 0.9 to 6.1 /min; p = 0.009), CPI (0.62; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.88 W/m2; p < 0.001) and CI (regression coefficient 1.96; 95% CI:0.45 to 3.47 L/min/m2; p = 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

Acidemia is associated with impaired cardiac function in seriously ill patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit supporting the potential value of early diagnosis and improvement of arterial pH in these patients.

FUNDING

The study was partially supported by unrestricted funds from the UCLA School of Medicine.

Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary artery thermodilution is the clinical reference method for cardiac output monitoring. Because both continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution are used in clinical practice it is important to know whether cardiac output measurements by the two methods are clinically interchangeable.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing cardiac output measurements assessed using continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in adult surgical and critically ill patients. 54 studies with 1522 patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The heterogeneity across the studies was high. The overall random effects model-derived pooled estimate of the mean of the differences was 0.08 (95%-confidence interval 0.01 to 0.16) L/min with pooled 95%-limits of agreement of - 1.68 to 1.85 L/min and a pooled percentage error of 29.7 (95%-confidence interval 20.5 to 38.9)%.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity across clinical studies comparing continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in adult surgical and critically ill patients is high. The overall trueness/accuracy of continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution is good (indicated by a pooled mean of the differences < 0.1 L/min). Pooled 95%-limits of agreement of - 1.68 to 1.85 L/min and a pooled percentage error of 29.7% suggest that continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution barely passes interchangeability criteria with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020159730.

Extravascular Lung Water and Intrathoracic Blood Volume Index Are Associated With Liver Function in Brain Dead Donors for Organ Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Hemodynamic measurements during organ transplant procedures are essential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this observational study, we measured clinical and hemodynamic parameters in 11 patients with advanced pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring. Normally distributed clinical data were calculated as means ± standard deviation; hemodynamic, metabolic, and respiratory parameters related to liver and renal function were compared by linear regression analysis using Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Compared with the normal range, systemic vascular resistance was high (2278.02 ± 719.6 dyne·s/cm²/m²) and intrathoracic blood volume was low (787.37 ± 224.01 mL/m²) in our patient group. C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 levels were 96.26 ± 68.10 mg/mL and 246.24 ± 355.74 mmol/L, respectively. Liver and renal function parameters were in normal ranges. Extravascular lung water was correlated with total, conjugated, and unconjugated bilirubin and albumin (r = 0.342/P = .005; r = 0.338/ P = .005; r = 0.394/P = .001, and r = 0.358/P = .003) but not with aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine. Intrathoracic blood volume index was correlated with total bilirubin, unconjugated bilirubin, and albumin (r = 0.324/P = .007; r = 0.394/P = .001, and r = 0.296/P = .015) but not with conjugated bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine. Lactate was not correlated with total bilirubin, unconjugated bilirubin, albumin, and serum creatinine, but base excess was correlated with total bilirubin, unconjugated bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and albumin. PO₂ and Pco₂ were not correlated with liver function, although PO₂ was correlated with albumin.

CONCLUSIONS

No correlations were shown between intrathoracic blood volume index, extravascular lung water, and liver function, but metabolic parameters, including base excess and lactate, were correlated with liver function. Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring may be a useful method to assess organ function and tissue perfusion in organ transplant.

Reliability of Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Analysis in a Piglet Model of Multi-step Intra-abdominal Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) analysis is a minimally invasive technique for continuous cardiac output (CO) measurement monitoring. PCCO requires calibration by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD). Studies showed good agreement between PCCO, TPTD CO and CO measured by pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) during stable hemodynamics. However, data are limited in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). The objective is to compare the agreement between PCCO, TPTD CO, and PATD CO in a piglet model of multi-step IAH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten female domestic piglets were enrolled in this study. IAH was induced by stepwise carbon dioxide inflation into peritoneal cavity in anesthetized piglets. Following baseline registrations, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was increased and maintained at each IAP plateau of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mmHg for 15 min before CO measurements. CO was measured by PATD and simultaneously by 2 femoral artery PCCO catheters. One PCCO catheter was recalibrated by TPTD at each IAP plateau while the other was only calibrated at baseline.

RESULTS

In pooled data of different IAP stages, TPTD CO and recalibrated PCCO (R-PCCO) showed excellent correlation (r² = 0.94 and 0.93) and small bias (-0.09 and -0.09 L/min), respectively, compared with PATD CO. However, PCCO without recalibration (NR-PCCO) were not accurate during IAH (r² = 0.58, bias: +0.32 L/min). When IAP increased to 30 mmHg, NR-PCCO failed to agree with PATD CO (r² = 0.47, bias: +0.52 L/min). On the contrary, a clinically accepted agreement between TPTD CO, R-PCCO, and PATD CO was observed at different IAP stages.

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD CO and R-PCCO agreed with PATD CO in this piglet model of multi-step IAH. On the contrary, NR-PCCO failed to agree with PATD CO when IAP increased to 30 mmHg or more. PCCO analysis needs recalibration in this condition.

Evaluation of pulse wave transit time analysis for non-invasive cardiac output quantification in pregnant patients

Pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery for foetal spina bifida have a need to be subjected to advanced haemodynamic monitoring. This observational study compares cardiac output as measured by transpulmonary thermodilution monitoring with the results of non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring. Transpulmonary thermodilution-based pulse contour analysis was performed for usual anaesthetic care, while non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring data were additionally recorded. Thirty-five patients were enrolled, resulting in 199 measurement time points. Cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring showed a weak correlation with the corresponding thermodilution measurements (correlation coefficient: 0.44, R2: 0.19; non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output: 7.4 [6.2-8.1]; thermodilution cardiac output: 8.9 [7.8-9.8]; p ≤ 0.001), while cardiac index experienced no such correlation. Furthermore, neither stroke volume nor stroke volume index correlated with the corresponding thermodilution-based data. Even though non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring consistently underestimated the corresponding thermodilution parameters, no trend analysis was achievable. Summarizing, we cannot suggest the use of non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring as an alternative to transpulmonary thermodilution for cardiac output monitoring in pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery for spina bifida.

Automated echocardiography for measuring and tracking cardiac output after cardiac surgery: a validation study

Echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output with automated software analyses of spectral curves in the left ventricular outflow tract has been introduced. This study aimed to assess the precision and accuracy of cardiac output measurements as well as the ability to track cardiac output changes over time comparing the automated echocardiographic method with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output technique and the manual echocardiographic method in cardiac surgery patients. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously with all three methods in 50 patients on the morning after cardiac surgery. A second comparison was performed 90-180 min later. Precisions for each method were measured. Bias and limits of agreement (LoA) between methods were assessed and concordance- and polar plots were used for evaluating trending of cardiac output. When comparing the automated echocardiographic method with the thermodilution technique, the mean bias was 0.72 L/min with LoA - 1.89; 3.33 L/min corresponding to a percentage error of 46%. The concordance rate was 47%. The mean bias between the automated- and the manual echocardiographic methods was - 0.06 L/min (95% LoA - 2.33; 2.21 L/min, percentage error 42%). The concordance rate was 79%. The automated echocardiographic method did not meet the criteria for interchangeability with the thermodilution technique or the manual echocardiographic method. Trending ability was poor when compared to the continuous thermodilution technique, but moderate when compared to the manual echocardiographic method.Trial registry number: NCT03372863. Retrospectively registered December 14th 2017.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is effective regarding peritoneum tissue paclitaxel distribution

BACKGROUND

In some patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, we could perform the cytoreductive surgery and the HIPEC procedure by a complete laparoscopic approach to avoid morbidity. We consider that using laparoscopic approach for performing peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC with closed CO₂ recirculation technique is possible and safe, with equal efficacy to conventional methods and hemodynamic complications.

OBJECTIVE

Monitoring the effectiveness of the drug distribution in a laparoscopic ctoreductive and HIPEC surgery group with CO₂ recirculation respect to a closed and open HIPEC group METHODS: Porcine model that included fifteen mini-pigs. Five pigs were operated with laparoscopic approach performing a pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. They later received a total laparoscopic closed HIPEC with CO₂ recirculation (G1). Group 2 (G2): five pigs operated by an open cytoreductive surgery and closed HIPEC technique. Group 3 (G3): five animals in which an open cytoreductive surgery and an open HIPEC technique was performed. Blood and peritoneal determinations were realized after recirculation of the drug, at 60 min using chromatographic analysis.

RESULTS

G1-G2: phrenic right peritoneum, p: 0.46. Phrenic left peritoneum, p: 0.46. Pelvic peritoneum, p: 0.17. Serum paclitaxel: p: 0.01. G1-G3: phrenic right peritoneum, p: 0.34. Phrenic left peritoneum, p: 0.34. Pelvic peritoneum, p: 0.17. Serum paclitaxel G1-G3, p: 0.02.

CONCLUSIONS

A total laparoscopic approach for ctoreductive surgery and closed HIPEC with CO₂ recirculation may be safe and feasible. In our experimental model there was no significant difference in tissue drug distribution respect the conventional techniques and there was a less toxicity because the serum drug concentration was significantly lower with laparoscopic approach respect the other groups.

Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass

The FloTrac system is a system for cardiac output (CO) measurement that is less invasive than the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the level of agreement and trending abilities of CO values measured using the fourth version of the FloTrac system (CCO-FloTrac) and PAC-originated continuous thermodilution (CCO-PAC) and (2) analyze the inadequate CO-discriminating ability of the FloTrac system before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Fifty patients were included. After exclusion, 32 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB were analyzed. All patients were monitored with a PAC and radial artery catheter connected to the FloTrac system. CO was assessed at 10 timing points during the surgery. In the Bland-Altman analysis, the percentage errors (bias, the limits of agreement) of the CCO-FloTrac were 61.82% (0.16, - 2.15 to 2.47 L min) and 51.80% (0.48, - 1.97 to 2.94 L min) before and after CPB, respectively, compared with CCO-PAC. The concordance rates in the four-quadrant plot were 64.10 and 62.16% and the angular concordance rates (angular mean bias, the radial limits of agreement) in the polar-plot analysis were 30.00% (17.62°, - 70.69° to 105.93°) and 38.63% (- 10.04°, - 96.73° to 76.30°) before and after CPB, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CCO-FloTrac was 0.56, 0.52, 0.52, and 0.72 for all, ≥ ± 5, ≥ ± 10, and ≥ ± 15% CO changes (ΔCO) of CCO-PAC before CPB, respectively, and 0.59, 0.55, 0.49, and 0.46 for all, ≥ ± 5, ≥ ± 10, and ≥ ± 15% ΔCO of CCO-PAC after CPB, respectively. When CO < 4 L/min was considered inadequate, the Cohen κ coefficient was 0.355 and 0.373 before and after CPB, respectively. The accuracy, trending ability, and inadequate CO-discriminating ability of the fourth version of the FloTrac system in CO monitoring are not statistically acceptable in cardiac surgery.

Validation of transpulmonary thermodilution variables in hemodynamically stable patients with heart diseases

Background

Transpulmonary thermodilution is recommended in the treatment of critically ill patients presenting with complex shock. However, so far it has not been validated in hemodynamically stable patients with heart disease.

Methods

We assessed the validity of cardiac output, global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), an established marker of preload thought to reflect the volume of all four heart chambers, global ejection fraction (GEF) and cardiac function index (CFI) as variables of cardiac function, and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) as indicator of pulmonary edema in 29 patients undergoing elective left and right heart catheterization including left ventricular angiography with stable coronary heart disease and normal cardiac function (controls, n = 11), moderate-to-severe aortic valve stenosis (AS, n = 10), or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 8).

Results

Cardiac output was similar in controls, AS, and DCM, with good correlation between transpulmonary thermodilution and pulmonary artery catheter using the Fick method (r = 0.69, p < 0.0001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was normal in controls and AS, but significantly higher in DCM (104 ± 37 vs 135 ± 63 vs 234 ± 24 ml, p < 0.01). GEDVI did not differentiate between patients with normal and patients with enlarged left ventricular end-diastolic volume (848 ± 128 vs 882 ± 213 ml m⁻², p = 0.60). No difference in GEF and CFI was found between patients with normal and patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with AS but not DCM had higher EVLWI than controls (9 ± 2 vs 12 ± 4 vs 11 ± 3 ml kg⁻¹, p = 0.04), while there was only a trend in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (8 ± 3 vs 10 ± 5 vs 14 ± 7 mmHg, p = 0.05).

Conclusions

Cardiac output measurement by transpulmonary thermodilution is unaffected by differences in ventricular size and outflow obstruction. However, GEDVI did not identify markedly enlarged left ventricular end-diastolic volumes, and neither GEF nor CFI reflected the increased heart chamber volumes and markedly impaired left ventricular function in patients with DCM. In contrast, EVLWI is probably a sensitive marker of subclinical pulmonary edema particularly in patients with elevated left-ventricular-filling pressure irrespective of differences in left ventricular function.

The Global End-Diastolic Volume (GEDV) Could Be More Appropiate to Fluid Management Than Central Venous Pressure (CVP) During Closed Hyperthermic Intrabdominal Chemotherapy with CO2 Circulation

BACKGROUND

Closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may increase abdominal pressure and effects of hemodynamic changes due to maintenance hyperthermia. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of our closed technique with CO₂ circulation in management fluid status and hemodynamic parameters by means of cardiac preload control measured by Global End Diastolic Values (GEDV) and a gas exchanger.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Pilot Clinical Study that included 18 advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing citoreductive surgery and HIPEC. We used a closed-perfusion system (PRS Combat®) that includes CO₂ circulation and a gas exchanger. Transpulmonary thermodilutions and hemodynamic measurements (PiCCO₂®) were performed after citoreductive surgery (Pre-HIPEC); At half time of the HIPEC (Intra-HIPEC); After HIPEC (Post-HIPEC).

RESULTS

No significant hemodynamic measurements changes in the three thermodilutions values of Cardiac Index (CI) (p = 0.227), Global End Diastolic Values (GEVD) (p = 0.966), Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) (p = 0,884) and Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI) (p = 0.082). No correlation between central venous pressure (CVP) and GEDV (Pre-HIPEC: r = 0.164, p = 0.211; Intra-HIPEC: r = 0.015, p = 0.900; Post-HIPEC: r = 0.018, p = 0.890). There was better correlation between GEDV and CI (Pre-HIPEC: r = 0.432, p = 0.071; Intra-HIPEC: r = 0.418, p = 0.074; Post-HIPEC: r = 0.411, p = 0.080).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed intrabdominal chemotherapy with CO₂ circulation model may be a safe model for HIPEC by means of a gas exchanger. GEDV and its changes significantly correlated to CI, and not observed for CVP. GEDV values may be more appropriate for monitoring cardiac preload, blood loss limitation and to predict changes in intravascular volume status during intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Serial semi-invasive hemodynamic assessment following pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to prospectively investigate the effects of pericardiectomy via median sternotomy on intra- and postoperative hemodynamics by a new semi-invasive device (Flotrac/VigileoTM monitor) using arterial pressure waveform analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients aged 15 to 55 years (mean+SD, 31.73 + 13.53 years), who had undergone total pericardiectomy via median sternotomy underwent serial hemodynamic evaluation. FlotracTM Sensor - derived stroke volume, stroke volume variation, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac index and right atrial pressure were measured just before and after pericardiectomy, at 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at discharge postoperatively.

RESULTS

Majority of patients (73.33%) exhibited statistically significant reduction of right atrial pressure and SVRI along with improvement in cardiac index and oxygen delivery in the immediate and late postoperative period. However, the stroke volume and stroke volume variation did not increase proportionately on completion of surgery. Patients with low cardiac output syndrome exhibited persistently high central venous pressure with reduced cardiac index and echocardiographically abnormal diastolic filling characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is early normalization of hemodynamics following pericardiectomy via median sternotomy and the adequacy of pericardiectomy can be accurately assessed by the new semi-invasive arterial pressure waveform analysis device. Stroke volume variation is a non-predictor of fluid requirement during and after pericardiectomy.

Short-term prognostic value of perioperative coronary sinus-derived-serum cardiac troponin-I, creatine kinase-MB, lactate, pyruvate, and lactate-pyruvate ratio in adult patients undergoing open heart surgery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the release pattern of different cardiac metabolites and biomarkers directly from the coronary sinus (CS) and to establish the diagnostic discrimination limits of each marker protein and metabolites to evaluate perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight patients undergoing first mitral and/or aortic valve replacements with/without coronary artery bypass grafting and Bentall procedure under CPB and blood cardioplegic arrest were studied. All cardiac metabolites and biomarkers were measured in serial CS-derived blood samples at pre-CPB, immediate post aortic declamping, 10 minutes post-CPB and 12 hrs post-CPB.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of cardiac biomarkers indicated lactate-pyruvate ratio as the superior diagnostic discriminator of myocardial injury with an optimal "cut-off" value >10.8 immediately after aortic declamping (AUC, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85-0.98). Lactate was the second best diagnostic discriminator of myocardial injury with an optimal "cut-off" value >2mmol/l at immediately after aortic declamping (AUC, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-0.96). Cardiac troponin-I was the third best diagnostic discriminator of myocardial injury with an optimal "cut-off" value >2.1ng/ml at immediately after aortic declamping (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.95). Creatine kinase-MB was the fourth best diagnostic discriminator of myocardial injury with an optimal "cut-off" value >58 log units/ml prior to decanulation (AUC, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurable cardiac damage exists in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardioplegic arrest. The degree of myocardial injury is more in patients with poor ventricular function and those requiring longer aortic clamp time. CS-derived lactate-pyruvate ratio, lactate, cTn-I served as superior diagnostic discriminators of peri-operative myocardial damage.

Changes of central venous oxygen saturation define fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the changes of central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo₂) after fluid challenge can define fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, septic shock patients with invasive cardiac output monitoring requiring fluid challenge were included. Cardiac index (CI) and Scvo₂ were measured before and after fluid challenges. The changes of CI (ΔCI) and the changes of Scvo₂ (ΔScvo₂) were calculated and analyzed using Pearson correlation. Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis was used to classify fluid responders and nonresponders. Area under ROC was calculated.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included and 18 patients (45%) were fluid responders. In the responders, CI increased from 3.4±1.1 to 4.4±1.0 L min^-1 m^-2 and Scvo₂ from 69.6%±9.8% to 77.1%±8.9% (both P<.001) after fluid challenge. In the nonresponders, neither CI nor Scvo₂ changed (4.1±1.3 vs 4.1±1.3 L min^-1 m^-2, 71.0%±13.8% vs 70.6%±14.1%, both P>.05). The correlation between ΔScvo₂ and ΔCI was significant (r=0.702, P<.001). The area under ROC of ΔScvo₂ to define fluid responsiveness was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.76-0.99). A ΔScvo₂ threshold value of 5.0% discriminated responders from nonresponders with sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.52-0.93) and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.75-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The changes of Scvo₂ correlate with the changes of CI, and the changes of Scvo₂ define fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

Evaluation of New Calibrated Pulse-Wave Analysis (VolumeViewTM/EV1000TM) for Cardiac Output Monitoring Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

Intrapulmonary thermodilution technique using a pulmonary artery catheter is widely used for measuring cardiac output (CO) in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, its invasiveness and associated complications have led to an interest in less invasive modalities. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether the new calibrated pulse-wave analysis method monitoring (VolumeView^TM/EV1000^TM) is interchangeable with intrapulmonary thermodilution technique.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation were enrolled in this prospective observational study. COs were recorded automatically by the two devices and compared simultaneously at 10-minute intervals. The agreement of absolute CO values and the tracking ability of CO changes trends were compared. A Bland-Altman analysis with percentage errors and concordance rate for trend analysis using both a 4-quadrant plot and a polar plot were performed on the data.

Results

A total of 375 paired datasets from 25 patients were included in analysis. COs measured by intrapulmonary thermodilution ranged from 3.8–13.7 L/min. The mean CO difference between the two techniques was 0.57 L/min, and the 95% limits of agreement were -0.98 L/min to 2.12 L/min with a percentage error of 42.3%. The percentage errors in the dissection, anhepatic, and reperfusion phase were 30.5%, 31.7%, and 27.4%, respectively. The concordance rate between the two techniques was 78.4%.

Conclusion

The calibrated pulse-wave analysis and intrapulmonary thermodilution failed to show acceptable interchangeability in terms of both estimating CO and tracking CO changes during living donor liver transplantation.

Impact of misplaced subclavian vein catheter into jugular vein on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables

OBJECTIVE

The subclavian vein (SCV) is usually used to inject the indicator of cold saline for a transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) measurement. The SCV catheter being misplaced into the internal jugular (IJV) vein is a common occurrence. The present study explores the influence of a misplaced SCV catheter on TPTD variables.

METHODS

Thirteen severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients with malposition of the SCV catheter were enrolled in this study. TPTD variables including cardiac index (CI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) were obtained after injection of cold saline via the misplaced SCV catheter. Then, the misplaced SCV catheter was removed and IJV access was constructed for a further set of TPTD variables. Comparisons were made between the TPTD results measured through the IJV and misplaced SCV accesses.

RESULTS

A total of 104 measurements were made from TPTD curves after injection of cold saline via the IJV and misplaced SCV accesses. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated an overestimation of +111.40 ml/m(2) (limits of agreement: 6.13 and 216.70 ml/m(2)) for GEDVI and ITBVI after a misplaced SCV injection. There were no significant influences on CI and EVLWI. The biases of +0.17 L/(min·m(2)) for CI and +0.17 ml/kg for EVLWI were revealed by Bland-Altman analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The malposition of an SCV catheter does influence the accuracy of TPTD variables, especially GEDVI and ITBVI. The position of the SCV catheter should be confirmed by chest X-ray in order to make good use of the TPTD measurements.

Evaluation of cardiac output by bioreactance technique in patients undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study compared the cardiac output (CO) obtained from PiCCO with that obtained from the noninvasive NICOM method.

METHODS

Twenty-one cirrhotic patients receiving liver transplantation were enrolled. During the operation, their CO was measured by the PiCCO system via the thermodilution method as the standard and by the NICOM method. Two parameters including cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI) were collected simultaneously at three phases during the surgery including the dissection phase (T1), the anhepatic phase (T2), and the reperfusion phase (T3). Correlation, Bland and Altman methods, and linear mixed model were used to evaluate the monitoring ability of both systems.

RESULTS

Poor correlation was noted between the data measured by NICOM and PiCCO; the correlation coefficients for CI and SVI measured between the two systems were 0.32 and 0.39, respectively. Bland and Altman analysis showed the percentage error of CI as 63.7%, and that of SVI as 66.6% for NICOM compared to PiCCO. Using the linear mixed model, the CI and SVI measured using NICOM were significantly higher than those using PiCCO (estimated regression coefficient 0.92 and 10.77, both p < 0.001). Mixed model analysis showed no differences between the trends of CI and SVI measured by the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

NICOM provided a comparable CI and SVI trend when compared to the gold standard PiCCO, but it raises concerns as an effective CO monitor because of its tendency to overestimate CI and SVI especially during the state of high cardiac output.

Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs

Background

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD_CO) and calibrated pulse contour analysis (PCA_CO) are alternatives to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (PATD_CO) measurement.

Hypothesis

Ten mL of ice‐cold thermal indicator (TI₁₀) would improve the agreement and trending ability between TPTD_CO and PATD_CO compared to 5 mL of indicator (TI₅) (Phase‐1). The agreement and TA between PCA_CO and PATD_CO would be poor during changes in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (Phase‐2).

Animals

Eight clinically normal dogs (20.8–31.5 kg).

Methods

Prospective, experimental study. Simultaneous TPTD_CO and PATD_CO (averaged from 3 repetitions) using TI₅ and TI₁₀ were obtained during isoflurane anesthesia combined or not with remifentanil or dobutamine (Phase‐1). Triplicate PCA_CO and PATD_CO measurements were recorded during phenylephrine‐induced vasoconstriction and nitroprusside‐induced vasodilation (Phase‐2).

Results

Mean bias (limits of agreement: LOA) (L/min), percentage bias (PB), and percentage error (PE) were 0.62 (−0.11 to 1.35), 16%, and 19% for TI₅; and 0.33 (−0.25 to 0.91), 9%, and 16% for TI₁₀. Mean bias (LOA), PB, and PE were 0.22 (−0.63 to 1.07), 6%, and 23% during phenylephrine; and 2.12 (0.70–3.55), 43%, and 29% during nitroprusside. Mean angular bias (radial LOA) values were 2° (−10° to 14°) and −1° (−9° to 6°) for TI₅ and TI₁₀, respectively (Phase‐1), and 38° (5°–71°) (Phase‐2).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Although TI₁₀ slightly improves the agreement and trending ability between TPTD_CO and PATD_CO in comparison to TI₅, both volumes can be used for TPTD_CO in replacement of PATD_CO. Vasodilation worsens the agreement between PCA_CO and PATD_CO. Because of PCA_CO's poor agreement and trending ability with PATD_CO during SVR changes, this method has limited clinical application.

Consistency of cardiac function index and global ejection fraction with global end-diastolic volume in patients with femoral central venous access for transpulmonary thermodilution: a prospective observational study

Global ejection fraction (GEF) and cardiac function index (CFI) are transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-derived indices of the systolic function. Their validity relies on an accurate determination of the global end-diastolic volume (GEDV). Due to an overestimation of GEDV using a femoral central venous catheter (CVC) a correction formula for indexed GEDV (GEDVI) has been implemented in the latest PiCCO™-algorithm. However, a recent study demonstrated that correction for femoral CVC does not pertain to pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI, which is calculated of extravascular lung water EVLW and GEDV. Therefore, it was the aim of our study to evaluate, if GEF and CFI are corrected for femoral CVC. In ten adult ICU-patients with PiCCO™-monitoring, ten triplicate TPTDs were performed within 30 h. 95 complete data sets were analyzed, if a GEDV corrected for CVC site was applied to derive CFI and GEF. Therefore, we compared displayed values CFI_displayed and GEF_displayed to CFI_calculated and GEF_calculated, which were calculated from displayed GEDV, cardiac output and stroke volume. GEDV_calculated derived from division of GEDVI by predicted body surface area did not substantially differ from GEDV_displayed (1448 ± 414 ml vs. 1447 ± 416 ml), which suggests a correction of GEDV for CVC site. However, CFI_displayed was significantly lower than CFI_calculated (3.8 ± 1.6/min vs. 5.1 ± 1. 8/min: p < 0.001), suggesting that CFI_displayed is based on an uncorrected GEDV. By contrast, GEF_calculated (23.1 ± 8.7 %) was not substantially different from GEF_displayed (22.4 ± 8.6 %). Although GEDV and GEF are corrected for femoral CVC site, this does not apply to CFI. However, all indices derived from GEDV should be calculated consistently.

Comparison of cardiac output measurements using transpulmonary thermodilution and conventional thermodilution techniques in anaesthetized dogs with fluid overload

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the agreement between cardiac output (CO) values obtained using a transpulmonary thermodilution technique (TPTDCO) and conventional thermodilution technique (TDCO) in anaesthetized dogs with fluid overload.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective experimental study.

ANIMALS

Six healthy Beagle dogs aged 7-8 years.

METHODS

Dogs were anaesthetized with sevoflurane in oxygen, and catheters were inserted for TPTDCO and TDCO measurement. After instrumentation, baseline CO was measured using each technique at a central venous pressure (CVP) of 3-7 mmHg. Dogs were subsequently administered lactated Ringer's solution and 6% hydroxyethyl starch to induce fluid overload. CO measurements were obtained using each technique at CVP values of 8-12 mmHg, 13-17 mmHg, 18-22 mmHg and 23-27 mmHg. Agreements between CO measurements obtained with the respective techniques were analysed using Dunnett's test, Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty pairs of CO values were obtained, ranging from 1.45 L minute(-1) to 4.69 L minute(-1) for TPTDCO and from 1.30 L minute(-1) to 4.61 L minute(-1) for TDCO. TPTDCO and TDCO values correlated strongly (r(2)  = 0.915, p < 0.001). The bias and mean relative bias between TPTDCO and TDCO were 0.26 ± 0.30 L minute(-1) (limits of agreement - 0.29 to 0.81 L minute(-1) ) and 9.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

TPTDCO and TDCO measurements obtained in anaesthetized dogs during fluid overload exhibited good agreement. Accordingly, transpulmonary thermodilution provides an accurate measurement of CO in dogs with fluid overload.

Influence of different infracardial positions of central venous catheters in hemodynamic monitoring using the transpulmonal thermodilution method

Hemodynamic measurements are often conducted by the transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-based PiCCO(®)-system. This requires a central-venous (CVC) and a thermistor-tipped arterial catheter, usually placed in the femoral artery. In certain clinical situations, CVC devices have to be placed in the inferior vena cava. However, little is known about the influence of different CVC positions (i.e. ipsi- vs. contra-lateral to the arterial catheter) on the accuracy of the TPTD measurement results. In this prospective observational study surgical intensive care unit patients who had been inserted with CVCs either into the superior (CVCVCS) or the inferior vena cava (CVCinf) in addition to an arterial PiCCO(®)-catheter, were enrolled. Patients were then divided into two groups: Group I was provided with a CVC in the contralateral (CVCcontra) and Group II in the ipsilateral (CVCipsi) inferior vena cava. Thermodilution via injection of ice-cold saline was then performed via CVCsup and CVCinf. Bland-Altman analysis for cardiac index (CI), extra-vascular lung water index (EVLWI) and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) were employed. Additional correction formulas for femorally assed parameters were determined. In a total of 28 patients, bias (limits of agreement) for measurements of CI in CVCcontra was found to be +0.2 (-0.4; +0.9) and +0.3 (-0.4; +1.0) L/min/m(2) in CVCipsi. GEDVI showed a bias of +274.8 (-47.3; +596.9) mL/m(2) in CVCcontra and +274.7 (-100.7; +650.1) mL/m(2) in CVCipsi. The mean EVLWI were 9.4 ± 4.3 mL/kg for EVLWIVCS and 10.7 ± 5.2 mL/kg for EVLWIinf. The LoA yielded at -3.4 and +6.1 mL/kg with a bias of +1.3 mL/kg. Percentage errors revealed clinically acceptable limits for CI and GEDVI, but not for EVLWI. Using TPTD via an infracardial central vein, measurements of CI showed high accuracy and precision while GEDVI measurements were precise with a lower accuracy, irrespective of the position of the infracardial CVC.

Predictors of the accuracy of pulse-contour cardiac index and suggestion of a calibration-index: a prospective evaluation and validation study

Background

Cardiac Index (CI) is a key-parameter of hemodynamic monitoring. Indicator-dilution is considered as gold standard and can be obtained by pulmonary arterial catheter or transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD; CItd). Furthermore, CI can be estimated by Pulse-Contour-Analysis (PCA) using arterial wave-form analysis (CIpc). Obviously, adjustment of CIpc to CItd initially improves the accuracy of CIpc. Despite uncertainty after which time accuracy of CIpc might be inappropriate, recalibration by TPTD is suggested after a maximum of 8 h.

We hypothesized that accuracy of CIpc might not only depend on time to last TPTD, but also on changes of the arterial wave curve detectable by PCA itself. Therefore, we tried to prospectively characterize predictors of accuracy and precision of CIpc (primary outcome). In addition to “time to last TPTD” we evaluated potential predictors detectable solely by pulse-contour-analysis.

Finally, the study aimed to develop a pulse-contour-derived “calibration-index” suggesting recalibration and to validate these results in an independent collective.

Methods

In 28 intensive-care-patients with PiCCO-monitoring (Pulsion Medical-Systems, Germany) 56 datasets were recorded. CIpc-values at baseline and after intervals of 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 8 h were compared to CItd derived from immediately subsequent TPTD. Results from this evaluation-collective were validated in an independent validation-collective (49 patients, 67 datasets).

Results

Mean bias values CItd-CIpc after different intervals ranged between -0.248 and 0.112 L/min/m². Percentage-error after different intervals to last TPTD ranged between 18.6% (evaluation, 2 h-interval) and 40.3% (validation, 6 h-interval). In the merged data, percentage-error was below 30% after 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h, and exceeded 30% only after 6 h. “Time to last calibration” was neither associated to accuracy nor to precision of CIpc in any uni- or multivariate analysis.

By contrast, the height of CIpc and particularly changes in CIpc compared to last thermodilution-derived CItd(base) univariately and independently predicted the bias CItd-CIpc in both collectives.

Relative changes of CIpc compared to CItd(base) exceeding thresholds derived from the evaluation-collective (-11.6% < CIpc-CItd(base)/CItd(base) < 7.4%) were confirmed as significant predictors of a bias |CItd-CIpc| ≥ 20% in the validation-collective.

Conclusion

Recalibration triggered by changes of CIpc compared to CItd(base) derived from last calibration should be preferred to fixed intervals.

Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to provide a meta-analysis of all five of the most popular systems for arterial pulse contour analysis compared with pulmonary artery thermodilution, the established reference method for measuring cardiac output (CO). The five investigated systems are FloTrac/Vigileo(®), PiCCO(®), LiDCO/PulseCO(®), PRAM/MostCare(®), and Modelflow.

SOURCE

In a comprehensive literature search through MEDLINE(®), Web of Knowledge (v.5.11), and Google Scholar, we identified prospective studies and reviews that compared the pulse contour approach with the reference method (n = 316). Data extracted from the 93 selected studies included range and mean cardiac output, bias, percentage error, software versions, and study population. We performed a pooled weighted analysis of their precision in determining CO in various patient groups and clinical settings.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Results of the majority of studies indicate that the five investigated systems show acceptable accuracy during hemodynamically stable conditions. Forty-three studies provided adequate data for a pooled weighted analysis and resulted in a mean (SD) total pooled bias of -0.28 (1.25) L·min(-1), percentage error of 40%, and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.71. In hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 8), we found a higher percentage error (45%) and bias of -0.54 (1.64) L·min(-1).

CONCLUSION

During hemodynamic instability, CO measurement based on continuous arterial pulse contour analysis shows only limited agreement with intermittent bolus thermodilution. The calibrated systems seem to deliver more accurate measurements than the auto-calibrated or the non-calibrated systems. For reliable use of these semi-invasive systems, especially for critical therapeutic decisions during hemodynamic disorders, both a strategy for hemodynamic optimization and further technological improvements are necessary.

Accuracy and precision of calibrated arterial pulse contour analysis in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy: a prospective observational clinical trial

Introduction

Calibrated arterial pulse contour analysis has become an established method for the continuous monitoring of cardiac output (PCCO). However, data on its validity in hemodynamically instable patients beyond the setting of cardiac surgery are scarce. We performed the present study to assess the validity and precision of PCCO-measurements using the PiCCO™-device compared to transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output (TPCO) as the reference technique in neurosurgical patients requiring high-dose vasopressor-therapy.

Methods

A total of 20 patients (16 females and 4 males) were included in this prospective observational clinical trial. All of them suffered from subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hunt&Hess grade I-V) due to rupture of a cerebral arterial aneurysm and underwent high-dose vasopressor therapy for the prevention/treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Simultaneous CO measurements by bolus TPCO and PCCO were obtained at baseline as well as 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after inclusion.

Results

PCCO- and TPCO-measurements were obtained at baseline as well as 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after inclusion. Patients received vasoactive support with (mean ± standard deviation, SD) 0.57 ± 0.49 μg · kg^-1 · min^-1 norepinephrine resulting in a mean arterial pressure of 103 ± 13 mmHg and a systemic vascular resistance of 943 ± 248 dyn · s · cm^-5. 136 CO-data pairs were analyzed. TPCO ranged from 5.2 to 14.3 l · min^-1 (mean ± SD 8.5 ± 2.0 l · min^-1) and PCCO ranged from 5.0 to 14.4 l · min^-1 (mean ± SD 8.6 ± 2.0 l · min^-1). Bias and limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the bias) were −0.03 ± 0.82 l · min^-1 and 1.62 l · min^-1, resulting in an overall percentage error of 18.8%. The precision of PCCO-measurements was 17.8%. Insufficient trending ability was indicated by concordance rates of 74% (exclusion zone of 15% (1.29 l · min^-1)) and 67% (without exclusion zone), as well as by polar plot analysis.

Conclusions

In neurosurgical patients requiring extensive vasoactive support, CO values obtained by calibrated PCCO showed clinically and statistically acceptable agreement with TPCO-measurements, but the results from concordance and polar plot analysis indicate an unreliable trending ability.

Edwards FloTrac™ sensor and Vigileo™ monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave

Edwards Lifesciences has recently introduced the FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor system for monitoring cardiac output continuously. It does not require thermodilution or dye dilution, but rather bases its calculations on arterial waveform characteristics in conjunction with patient demographic data. It is unique among arterial waveform cardiac output systems in that it does not require calibration with another method. Studies thus far indicate that it is robust and accurate over a wide range of cardiac output and clinical conditions. It will be valuable in the care of many patients, such as those with critical illness, cardiovascular dysfunction, trauma or undergoing major surgery.

Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?

Hemodynamic monitoring and management has greatly improved during the past decade. Technologies have evolved from very invasive to non-invasive, and the philosophy has shifted from a static approach to a functional approach. However, despite these major changes, the critical care community still has potential to improve its ability to adopt the most modern standards of research methodology in order to more effectively evaluate new monitoring systems and their impact on patient outcome. Today, despite the huge enthusiasm raised by new hemodynamic monitoring systems, there is still a big gap between clinical research studies evaluating these monitors and clinical practice. A few studies, especially in the perioperative period, have shown that hemodynamic monitoring systems coupled with treatment protocols can improve patient outcome. These trials are small and, overall, the corpus of science related to this topic does not yet fit the standard of clinical research methodology encountered in other specialties such as cardiology and oncology. Larger randomized trials or quality improvement processes will probably answer questions related to the real impact of these systems.

Effects of cardiac output levels on the measurement of transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (CO) correlates closely with pulmonary artery (PA) thermodilution CO. Levels of CO may contribute to varying amounts of thermal indicator loss and recirculation during thermodilution CO measurement. This study aimed to investigate the effects of CO levels on the agreement between transpulmonary and PA thermodilution CO in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with ARDS were prospectively enrolled. Paired bolus transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac index (BCItp) and continuous PA thermodilution cardiac index (CCIpa) data were recorded at baseline and repeated immediately and at 2, 4, and 6 hours after volume expansion with a 500-mL infusion of 10% pentastarch (HES 200/0.5).

RESULTS

One hundred and ten paired cardiac index measurements were recorded and divided into 4 quartiles from the lowest to the highest CCIpa. The mean BCItp was higher than CCIpa, and the Bland and Altman analysis revealed a mean (SD) bias of 0.57 (0.75) L L min(-1) m(-2). The limits of agreement (2SD) were +2.07 to -0.93 L min(-1) m(-2). BCItp correlated closely with CCIpa (R = 0.887). CCIpa negatively correlated with the difference between BCItp and CCIpa (R = -0.26). The bias of quartile 1 with the least CCIpa was significantly greater than those of the three other quartiles.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ARDS, transpulmonary thermodilution is a clinically acceptable and interchangeable alternative to PA thermodilution for CO measurement. Levels of CO weakly and negatively correlate with the difference between BCItp and CCIpa. There is greater overestimation of BCItp over CCIpa in low than in high CO states.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level II.

Stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Stroke volume variation (SVV) has been shown to be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, the predictive role of SVV measured by FloTrac/Vigileo system in prediction of fluid responsiveness was unproven in patients undergoing ventilation with low tidal volume.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery were randomly divided into two groups: Group C [n(1)=20, tidal volume (V(t)) = 8 ml/kg, frequency (F) = 12/min] and Group L [n(2)=30, V(t)= 6 ml/kg, F=16/min]. After anesthesia induction, 6% hydroxyethyl starch130/0.4 solution (7 ml/kg) was intravenously transfused. Besides standard haemodynamic monitoring, SVV, cardiac output, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were determined with the FloTrac/Vigileo system before and after fluid loading.

RESULTS

After fluid loading, the MAP, CVP, SVI and CI increased significantly, whereas the SVV and SVR decreased markedly in both groups. SVI was significantly correlated to the SVV, CVP but not the HR, MAP and SVR. SVI was significantly correlated to the SVV before fluid loading (Group C: r = 0.909; Group L: r = 0.758) but not the HR, MAP, CVP and SVR before fluid loading. The largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was found for SVV (Group C, 0.852; Group L, 0.814), and the AUC for other preloading indices in two groups ranged from 0.324 to 0.460.

CONCLUSION

SVV measured by FloTrac/Vigileo system can predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing ventilation with low tidal volumes during gastrointestinal surgery.

Liver transplantation: Advances and perioperative care

Liver transplantation is one of the treatments for many-life threatening liver diseases. Numerous advances in liver transplant surgery, anaesthesia and perioperative care have allowed for an increasing number of these procedures. The purpose of this review is to consider some of the important advances in perioperative care of liver transplant patients such as pre-operative evaluation, intraoperative monitoring and management and early extubation. A PubMed and EMBASE search of terms “Anaesthesia” and “Liver Transplantation” were performed with filters of articles in “English”, “Adult” and relevant recent publications of randomised control trial, editorial, systemic review and non-systemic review were selected and synthesized according to the author's personal and professional perspective in the field of liver transplantation and anaesthesia. The article outlines strategies in organ preservation, training and transplant database for further research.

Perioperative monitoring in liver transplant patients

Liver transplant (LT) is a major surgical undertaking involving major fluid shifts, hemodynamic instability and metabolic derangements in a patient with preexisting liver failure and multisystemic derangements. Monitoring and organ support initiated in the preoperative phase is continued intraoperatively and into the postoperative phase to ensure an optimal outcome. As cardiovascular events are the leading cause of non-graft related death among LT recipients, major emphasis is placed on cardiovascular monitoring. The other essential monitoring are the continuous assessment of coagulapathy, extent of metabolic derangements, dyselectrolytemis and intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. The type and extent of monitoring differs with need according to preexisting child status of the patient and the extent of systemic derangements. It also varies among transplant centers and is mainly determined by individual or institutional practices.

Advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles and practice in neurocritical care

Advanced hemodynamic monitoring is necessary for many patients with acute brain and/or spinal cord injury. Optimizing cerebral and systemic physiology requires multi-organ system function monitoring. Hemodynamic manipulations are cardinal among interventions to regulate cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral blood flow. The pulmonary artery catheter is not any more the sole tool available; less invasive and potentially more accurate methodologies have been developed and employed in the operating room and among diverse critically ill populations. These include transpulmonary thermodilution, arterial pressure pulse contour, and waveform analysis and bedside critical care ultrasound. A thorough understanding of hemodynamics and of the available monitoring modalities is an essential skill for the neurointensivist.