Blood glucose concentration profile after 10 mg dexamethasone in non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic patients undergoing abdominal surgery

Comparing Different Doses of Intravenous Dexamethasone for Prolonging Analgesia After a Single-Shot Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background Supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) is a widely used regional anesthesia technique for upper limb surgeries. Intravenous dexamethasone is known to prolong postoperative analgesia, but the optimal dose remains uncertain due to potential side effects like hyperglycemia associated with high doses. This study compares the efficacy of different doses of intravenous dexamethasone in enhancing the duration of analgesia following a single-shot ultrasound-guided SCBPB. Methods This prospective, randomized study included 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-III patients undergoing upper limb surgery. All patients received an ultrasound-guided SCBPB, followed by general anesthesia (GA) and were randomly allocated into four groups using computer-generated randomization: group 1: 0.5% levobupivacaine (20 ml) + 8 mg IV dexamethasone; group 2: 0.5% levobupivacaine (20 ml) + 4 mg IV dexamethasone; group 3: 0.5% levobupivacaine (20 ml) + 2 mg IV dexamethasone; group 4 (control): 0.5% levobupivacaine (20 ml) + IV 0.9% normal saline. Postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale, VAS), duration of analgesia, rescue analgesic requirement, incidence of nausea/vomiting, and blood glucose levels were recorded over 24 hours. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. Results Patients who received IV dexamethasone showed significantly prolonged analgesia compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The duration of analgesia in the 8 mg group was 13.8 ± 1.5 hours, compared to 11.2 ± 1.3 hours (4 mg), 9.4 ± 1.2 hours (2 mg), and 6.8 ± 1.1 hours in the control group. This represents a 103% increase in analgesia duration with 8 mg dexamethasone compared to the control. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was lower in dexamethasone groups (p = 0.02). However, 8 mg dexamethasone was associated with transient hyperglycemia (p = 0.04), with blood glucose levels peaking at 185 ± 12 mg/dL compared to 145 ± 10 mg/dL in the control group. Conclusion Intravenous dexamethasone significantly prolongs analgesia following SCBPB, with 8 mg providing the longest duration (103% increase vs. control). However, 4 mg may offer a balance between efficacy and minimal side effects, particularly in avoiding postoperative hyperglycemia.

Dexamethasone-Associated Hyperglycemia is Not Associated With Infectious Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Diabetic Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative infection is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Perioperative use of dexamethasone in patients who have diabetes mellitus (DM) remains controversial due to concern for increased infection risk. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dexamethasone and infection risk among patients who have DM undergoing TJA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on adult patients who underwent primary, elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) between January 2016 and December 2021 using a large national database. We identified 110,568 TJA patients (TKA: 66.6%; THA: 33.4%), 31.0% (34,298) of which had DM. Patients who received perioperative dexamethasone were compared to those who did not. The primary end points were the 90-day risk of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, surgical site infection (SSI), and other non-SSI (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, sepsis).

RESULTS

When modeling the association between dexamethasone exposure and study outcomes while accounting for the interaction between dexamethasone and morning blood glucose levels, dexamethasone administration conferred no increased odds of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection nor SSI in diabetics. However, dexamethasone significantly lowered the adjusted odds of other postoperative infections in diabetic patients (TKA: adjusted odds ratio = 09, 95% confidence interval = 0.8 to 1.0, P = .030; THA: adjusted odds ratio = 0.7, 95% confidence interval = 0.6 to 0.9, P = .001); specifically in patients with morning blood glucose levels between 110 to 248 mg/dL in TKA and ≤ 172 mg/dL in THA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides strong evidence against withholding dexamethasone in diabetic patients undergoing TJA based on concern for infection. Instead, short-course perioperative dexamethasone reduced infection risk in select patients. The narrative surrounding dexamethasone should shift away from questions about whether dexamethasone is appropriate for diabetic patients, and instead focus on how best to optimize its use.

Treating the Side Effects of Exogenous Glucocorticoids; Can We Separate the Good From the Bad?

It is estimated that 2% to 3% of the population are currently prescribed systemic or topical glucocorticoid treatment. The potent anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids to deliver therapeutic benefit is not in doubt. However, the side effects associated with their use, including central weight gain, hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and osteoporosis, often collectively termed iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome, are associated with a significant health and economic burden. The precise cellular mechanisms underpinning the differential action of glucocorticoids to drive the desirable and undesirable effects are still not completely understood. Faced with the unmet clinical need to limit glucocorticoid-induced adverse effects alongside ensuring the preservation of anti-inflammatory actions, several strategies have been pursued. The coprescription of existing licensed drugs to treat incident adverse effects can be effective, but data examining the prevention of adverse effects are limited. Novel selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists and selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators have been designed that aim to specifically and selectively activate anti-inflammatory responses based upon their interaction with the glucocorticoid receptor. Several of these compounds are currently in clinical trials to evaluate their efficacy. More recently, strategies exploiting tissue-specific glucocorticoid metabolism through the isoforms of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase has shown early potential, although data from clinical trials are limited. The aim of any treatment is to maximize benefit while minimizing risk, and within this review we define the adverse effect profile associated with glucocorticoid use and evaluate current and developing strategies that aim to limit side effects but preserve desirable therapeutic efficacy.

Effect of dexamethasone administration for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis on glucose levels in adults with diabetes undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of intravenous dexamethasone given intraoperatively for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis on maximal blood glucose level within the initial 24 hours following elective surgery for patients with diabetes.

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a prevalent adverse effect of anesthesia that leads to morbidity, increased health care costs, and unanticipated hospital admissions. Dexamethasone is an effective prophylactic agent that confers secondary analgesic and anti-inflammatory benefits. However, its use in patients with diabetes remains controversial due to the potential for increased postoperative blood glucose levels.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review considered studies with participants 18 years of age or older with type 1 or 2 diabetes undergoing an elective surgical procedure. Eligible studies reported postoperative blood glucose levels in adults with diabetes after receiving a single 4-10 mg prophylactic dose of intravenous dexamethasone intraoperatively for postoperative nausea and vomiting. The primary outcome was maximum blood glucose level in the first 24 hours after surgery. All study designs were eligible for inclusion. Studies were excluded if they lacked a control group with diabetes or if they did not report maximum blood glucose values in both groups.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase, Web of Science, TRIP database, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was completed in October 2021. Gray literature resources were also searched. No date or language restrictions were applied. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI appraisal tools for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. A meta-analysis of maximal postoperative blood glucose level within 24 hours of surgery was performed, as well as subgroup analyses by dexamethasone dose, insulin treatment, and study design type.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 6 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study) were included in this review, with 1 study excluded from meta-analysis and results reported narratively. The total sample size of studies included in meta-analysis was 2567. The administration of dexamethasone significantly increased maximal blood glucose levels in the 24 hours immediately following surgery compared with control groups with diabetes, as demonstrated by randomized controlled trials (mean difference [MD] 39.56 mg/dL; 95% CI 16.18 to 62.94; P < 0.001; I2 = 87%) and observational studies (MD 26.31 mg/dL; 95% CI 7.10 to 45.52; P = 0.007; I2 = 92%). This increase in blood glucose was significant for all doses of dexamethasone: 4 mg (MD 40.81 mg/dL; 95% CI 2.42 to 79.19; P = 0.001; I2 = 91%), 8 mg (randomized controlled trials only; MD 39.45 mg/dL; 95% CI 15.32 to 63.58; P = 0.001; I2 = 86%), and mixed 4-10 mg dose (MD 30.82 mg/dL; 95% CI 6.75 to 54.88; P < 0.012; I2 = 93%). Postoperative hyperglycemia persisted in studies using insulin treatment as well as those not using insulin protocols. The overall certainty of the findings ranged from very low for outcomes that included cohort studies to moderate when outcomes from randomized controlled trials were analyzed separately. However, the quantitative findings of the experimental and observational studies were clinically similar. Risk of bias presented minimal concerns in all included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone leads to transient postoperative hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes undergoing elective surgery when given as a single 4-10 mg intravenous dose for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. The clinical relevance of hyperglycemia is debatable given its small magnitude and transient nature. Without more tightly controlled data, methodological consistency, and baseline blood glucose values, it is impossible to test causal links between hyperglycemia and pre-existing patient factors (eg, hemoglobin A1C levels) or postoperative complications.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020185607.

[Postoperative nausea and vomiting-recommendations for its prevention and therapy in paediatric medicine]

Post-operative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV/POV) are among the biggest problems occurring in the paediatric recovery room and in the course of the following post-operative period. Apart from pain and emergence delirium, PONV is one of the main causes of post-operative discomfort in children. The DGAI Scientific Working Group on Paediatric Anaesthesia already worked out recommendations for the prevention and treatment of PONV in children years ago. These recommendations have now been revised by a team of experts, the current literature has been reviewed, and evidence-based core recommendations have been consented. Key elements of the new recommendations consist of effective individual measures for prevention and therapy, next to the implementation of a fixed dual prophylaxis in the clinical routine applicable to all children ≥ 3 years of age.

Bilateral Complete Loss and Partial Regeneration of Photoreceptor Layers in a Pediatric Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) Case

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease is a multisystem autoimmune disease affecting melanocyte-containing tissues in the eyes, meninges, ear, and skin. As far as we are aware, this is a unique case report documenting the regeneration of the photoreceptor layer after bilateral complete loss of the photoreceptor layer in a child with VKH. We report a case of a 12-year-old male with no significant past medical history who presented during the chronic stage of incomplete VKH. He was found to have a complete loss of photoreceptor layer in both eyes during a work-up to confirm the aforementioned disease. Upon receiving his first pulse dose of 500 mg IV methylprednisolone as a treatment course, he developed severe steroid-induced hyperglycemia (random blood glucose of 17.6 mmol/L). Additionally, a brain MRI revealed pituitary gland changes compatible with diabetes insipidus, which is a combination that was mentioned once in the literature before. A review of the systems did not suggest any other systemic diseases. The patient's elevated blood sugar level was managed by a pediatrician, and it normalized. At his last visit, optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed hypertrophy/regeneration of the photoreceptor layer. This case report indicates that retinal photoreceptor layer regeneration can be sometimes observed with follow-up after the resolution of inflammation and uveitis.

Dexamethasone-induced hyperglycaemia in COVID-19: Glycaemic profile in patients without diabetes and factors associated with hyperglycaemia

AIMS

To evaluate glycaemic profiles of COVID-19 patients without diabetes receiving dexamethasone and determine factors associated with hyperglycaemia.

METHODS

All subjects without pre-existing diabetes receiving dexamethasone 6 mg for COVID-19 in a non-critical care setting were identified. Glucose profiles were obtained from capillary blood glucose (BG). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with dexamethasone-induced hyperglycaemia (BG ≥ 10 mmol/L).

RESULTS

Of 254 subjects, 129 (50.8%) were male with age 51.1 ± 18.2 years and weight 89.7 ± 26.3 kg. Hyperglycaemia post-dexamethasone occurred in 121 (47.6%). Glucose excursions began within three hours (6.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L pre-dexamethasone vs 8.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L at ≤ 3 h, p < 0.001) and peaked at 7-9 h (10.5 ± 2.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001 vs pre-dexamethasone). BGs post-intravenous were higher than post-oral administration for the initial six hours. Hyperglycaemic subjects were older (57.8 ± 17.5 years vs 45.0 ± 16.6 years, p < 0.001), had higher initial glucose (6.3 ± 1.0 vs 5.9 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p = 0.004), higher HbA1c (5.8 ± 0.3% [40 ± 3.5 mmol/mol] vs 5.5 ± 0.4% [37 ± 4.1 mmol/mol], p < 0.001) higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (100 ± 68 vs 83 ± 58 mg/L, p = 0.026), and lower eGFR (79 ± 17 vs 84 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.045). Mortality was greater in the hyperglycaemia group (9/121 [7.4%] vs 2/133 [1.5%], p = 0.02). Age, HbA1c and CRP were independently associated with hyperglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of subjects without diabetes experienced hyperglycaemia post-dexamethasone for COVID-19, peak occurring after 7-9 h. Age, HbA1c and CRP were associated with hyperglycaemia.

Safety of body contouring surgery in an aging patient population

The fastest-growing age group undergoing cosmetic procedures are those over age 60, i.e. the aging patient group. While advanced age is a known predictor for increased surgical complications, the effects of age on complications in specific plastic procedures have yet to be thoroughly investigated. To determine the relationship between increased age and risk of surgical complications following body contouring procedures, specifically: abdominoplasty, brachioplasty, mastopexy, bilateral reduction, and thigh lift. A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing body contouring procedures of the categories mentioned above between 2000-2018 at a tertiary university medical center. Patients were divided into two age groups: those below and those above, age 60. Data analysis included: demographics, underlying medical conditions, procedure type, and occurrence of postoperative complications (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system). 803 body contouring procedures were identified, with 12% performed on the aging population. Aging patients had more underlying medical conditions than the younger ones. While the distribution of procedure type was similar in both groups, mastopexy was more common in aging patients. Of the 107 procedures identified as having complications, 37 were classified as grade I, 38 as grade II, and 32 as grade III. As a categorical variable, no relationship was found between the age of the patients and an increased risk of postoperative complications (age cut-off as 60). However, as a continuous variable, increased age did increase the overall risk of postoperative complications, although no optimal age as a cut-off point was identified. In multivariant analysis, diabetes mellitus with abdominoplasty was identified as a risk factor for postoperative complications. Conclusions: When undergoing body contouring procedures, we found that patients over the age of 60 are not at increased risk for postoperative complications than those under that age. Although age as a continuous variable was found to increase the overall postoperative complications, no optimal age could be defined as a cut-off point.

Fresh insights into glucocorticoid-induced diabetes mellitus and new therapeutic directions

Glucocorticoid hormones were discovered to have use as potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapeutics in the 1940s and their continued use and development have successfully revolutionized the management of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. However, long-term use of glucocorticoids is severely hampered by undesirable metabolic complications, including the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. These effects occur due to glucocorticoid receptor activation within multiple tissues, which results in inter-organ crosstalk that increases hepatic glucose production and inhibits peripheral glucose uptake. Despite the high prevalence of glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycaemia associated with their routine clinical use, treatment protocols for optimal management of the metabolic adverse effects are lacking or underutilized. The type, dose and potency of the glucocorticoid administered dictates the choice of hypoglycaemic intervention (non-insulin or insulin therapy) that should be provided to patients. The longstanding quest to identify dissociated glucocorticoid receptor agonists to separate the hyperglycaemic complications of glucocorticoids from their therapeutically beneficial anti-inflammatory effects is ongoing, with selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators in clinical testing. Promising areas of preclinical research include new mechanisms to disrupt glucocorticoid signalling in a tissue-selective manner and the identification of novel targets that can selectively dissociate the effects of glucocorticoids. These research arms share the ultimate goal of achieving the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids without the metabolic consequences.

Single-dose premedication enhances multimodal analgesia after knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With the current trend to reduce postoperative opioid use to enhance recovery and address perioperative opioid addiction concerns, the challenge of managing pain after total knee arthroplasty has increased. This study examined the effect of adding a preoperative medication regime to a multimodal postoperative analgesia protocol that included regional anaesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing elective first-time unilateral knee arthroplasty received celecoxib 100mg, gabapentin 600mg and dexamethasone 10mg po one hour before skin incision. They were compared to a sequential retrospective cohort of 49 patients. All patients routinely received acetaminophen 650mg po q6h, ibuprofen 400mg po q8h, patient-controlled opioid analgesia and continuous adductor canal blocks postoperatively. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48h.

RESULTS

Pain scores and cumulative opioid use were statistically and clinically significantly reduced at all time points up to 48h.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining preoperative oral celecoxib, gabapentin and dexamethasone had a clinically significantly effect in reducing pain scores and opioid use for at least 48h. Most of this effect is probably due to dexamethasone.

Hospital management of hyperglycemia in the context of COVID-19: evidence-based clinical considerations

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented crisis, and early on, it has been shown that diabetes is an important risk factor for complications and mortality in infected patients, as demonstrated by several studies. Moreover, hyperglycemia, regardless of whether patients have diabetes, is associated with poorer outcomes, which suggests that adequate monitoring and treatment of elevated glycemia in the hospital setting can improve patient outcomes. In patients with COVID-19, glycemic control may be impaired as a consequence of the infection itself (aggravating pre-existing diabetes and potentially precipitating new-onset diabetes), inflammation, or corticosteroid use-a well-established therapy to reduce COVID-19 complications, especially in the intensive care unit. This article reviews the link between diabetes and hyperglycemia, and COVID-19, with a brief review of potential mechanisms, along with emerging evidence on the effect of glycemic control on COVID-19 outcomes, especially in hospital settings.

Opioid-Sparing Perioperative Analgesia Within Enhanced Recovery Programs

Opioid-based analgesia in the perioperative period can provide excellent pain control, but this approach exposes the patient to avoidable side effects and possible harm. Optimal analgesia, an approach that targets the fastest functional recovery with adequate pain control while minimizing side effects, can be achieved with opioid minimization. Many different options for nonopioid multimodal analgesia exist and have been shown to be efficacious, with certain modalities being more beneficial for specific surgeries. This review will present the evidence and practical tips for these management strategies.

Effects of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether administrations of intravenous (IV) dexamethasone jeopardize blood glycemic control, increase rates of postoperative complications, and diabetic medication change after TKA.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 427 patients with DM who underwent TKA. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of IV dexamethasone (Dexa and No Dexa). For the Dexa, IV dexamethasone (5mg) was administered twice (surgery day, postoperative day 1). Blood glucose level until postoperative day 5, whether the mean blood glucose level was ≥200 mg/dL or not, the rate of a diabetic medication change, and postoperative complications (surgical site infection, delayed wound healing) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The adverse effects of IV dexamethasone on glycemic control were limited to the day of injection. The mean blood glucose level was 168.8 mg/dL and 204.4 mg/dL on operation day and 193.0 mg/dL and 210.5 mg/dL on postoperative day 1 in the No Dexa and the Dexa, respectively. High preoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, but not IV dexamethasone administration, increased the risk of postoperative blood glucose level ≥200 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR], 2.810) and diabetic medication change (OR, 3.635, P < .001). A preoperative HbA1c level of >7.05% was associated with the risk of diabetic medication change. There was increase of postoperative complications (OR, 0.693, P = .552).

CONCLUSIONS

IV dexamethasone have transient effects on increasing the blood glucose level after TKA in patients with DM. However, patients with a preoperative HbA1c level of ≥7.05% may need to change their diabetic medication after TKA, regardless of IV dexamethasone administration.

Randomized Controlled Trial: Perioperative Dexamethasone Reduces Excessive Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Ileus After Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

An excessive postoperative inflammatory response is common after surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and may be associated with an increased incidence of postoperative ileus. This study assessed the role of perioperative dexamethasone in postoperative ileus after IBD surgery.

METHOD

Patients undergoing elective IBD surgery were randomized to either an intravenous 8-mg dose of dexamethasone (n = 151) or placebo (n = 151) upon induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus. Secondary outcomes included incidence of reported nausea or vomiting, time to first passage of flatus and stool, GI-2 recovery, postoperative pain, length of stay, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

An intention-to-treat analysis revealed that patients who received dexamethasone exhibited a lower incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus (22.5% vs 38.4%; P = 0.003), shorter time to first passage of stool (28 vs 48 h, P < 0.001), GI-2 recovery (72 vs 120 h; P < 0.001), reduced postoperative length of stay (9.0 vs 10.0 d; P = 0.002), and less postoperative pain (P < 0.05) compared with controls. Moreover, there were no significant differences in postoperative nausea or vomiting (P = 0.531), major postoperative complications (P = 0.165), or surgical site infections (P = 0.337) between the groups. A benefit was only observed in patients with Crohn's disease, restored bowel continuity, colon/rectal resections, and those who underwent open operations.

CONCLUSION

A single, intravenous 8-mg dose of dexamethasone upon induction of anesthesia reduced the incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus, the intensity of postoperative pain, and shortened the postoperative length of stay for IBD patients undergoing elective surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03456752.

Postoperative Infection Risk in Total Joint Arthroplasty After Perioperative IV Corticosteroid Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Perioperative corticosteroid administration is associated with reduced postoperative nausea, pain, and enhanced recovery after surgery. However, potential complications including wound and periprosthetic joint infections remain a concern for surgeons after total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

A systematic review of the search databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was made in January 2021 to identify comparative studies evaluating infection risk after perioperative corticosteroid administration in TJA. PRISMA guidelines were used for this review. Meta-analysis was used to assess infection risk in accordance with joint and corticosteroid dosing regimen used.

RESULTS

201 studies were returned after initial search strategy, with 29 included for review after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were categorized as using low- or high-dose corticosteroid with single or repeat dosing regimens. Single low-dose corticosteroid administration was not associated with an increased risk of infection (P = .4; CI = 0.00-0.00). Single high-dose corticosteroid was not associated with an increased infection risk (P = .3; CI = 0.00-0.01) nor did repeat low-dose regimens result in increased risk of infection (P = .8; CI = -0.02-0.02). Studies assessing repeat high-dosing regimens reported no increased infection, with small numbers of participants included. No significant risk difference in infection risk was noted in hip (P = .59; CI = -0.03-0.02) or knee (P = .2; CI = 0.00-0.01) arthroplasty. Heterogeneity in patient profiles included in studies to date was noted.

CONCLUSION

Use of perioperative corticosteroid in TJA does not appear to be associated with increased risk of postoperative infection in patients with limited comorbidities. Further research is warranted to evaluate postoperative complications after TJA in these at-risk patient populations.

Safety and efficacy of single-dose preoperative intravenous dexamethasone on post-operative nausea and vomiting following breast surgery at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital

Objectives

Dexamethasone has beneficial effects on postoperative nausea and vomiting, however, many clinicians have raised legitimate concerns regarding its effect on blood glucose concentrations. This study determined the safety and efficacy of a single pre-operative dose of dexamethasone for PONV prophylaxis in patients undergoing breast surgery.

Design

Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting

Surgical wards of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.

Participants

The study was conducted among breast surgery patients. They were consecutively recruited and randomized into two groups: dexamethasone (n = 47) and placebo (n = 47).

Interventions

Patients in the dexamethasone group received 8mg (2mls of 4mg/ml) dexamethasone while those in the placebo group received 2mls of saline intravenously. PONV impact scores and blood glucose levels were recorded at 4, 8 and 24 hours postoperatively.

Main outcome measures

Incidence of PONV and blood glucose levels.

Results

The incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) was lower in the dexamethasone group compared with the placebo group (12.8% vs. 29.8%; p-value= 0.044). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV) and PONV between the two groups. Blood glucose levels were higher in the dexamethasone group throughout the study period and significant at 8 and 24 hours postoperatively (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of clinically significant hyperglycemia between the groups (p-value = 0.169).

Conclusion

A preoperative intravenous dexamethasone 8mg, reduces PON but not POV or PONV in breast surgery without clinically significant postoperative hyperglycemia.

Funding

Non declared.

Could Exogenous Insulin Ameliorate the Metabolic Dysfunction Induced by Glucocorticoids and COVID-19?

The finding that high-dose dexamethasone improves survival in those requiring critical care due to COVID-19 will mean much greater usage of glucocorticoids in the subsequent waves of coronavirus infection. Furthermore, the consistent finding of adverse outcomes from COVID-19 in individuals with obesity, hypertension and diabetes has focussed attention on the metabolic dysfunction that may arise with critical illness. The SARS coronavirus itself may promote relative insulin deficiency, ketogenesis and hyperglycaemia in susceptible individuals. In conjunction with prolonged critical care, these components will promote a catabolic state. Insulin infusion is the mainstay of therapy for treatment of hyperglycaemia in acute illness but what is the effect of insulin on the admixture of glucocorticoids and COVID-19? This article reviews the evidence for the effect of insulin on clinical outcomes and intermediary metabolism in critical illness.

Preoperative dexamethasone for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids can reduce pain but the optimal dose and safety profiles are still uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate two different doses of dexamethasone for pain management and their side effects after total knee arthroplasty.

DESIGN

A prospective randomised, controlled trial.

SETTING

A tertiary teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

PATIENTS

One hundred and forty-six patients were randomly allocated to one of three study groups.

INTERVENTIONS

Before operation, patients in group D8, D16 and P received dexamethasone 8 mg, dexamethasone 16 mg and placebo (0.9% saline), respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, physical parameters of the knees and side effects of dexamethasone.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, group D16 patients had significantly less pain during maximal active flexion on postoperative day 3 [-1.3 (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.31), P = 0.005]. There was also a significant dose-dependent trend between pain scores and dexamethasone dose (P = 0.002). Compared with placebo, patients in group D16 consumed significantly less opioid [-6.4 mg (95% CI, -11.6 to -1.2), P = 0.025] and had stronger quadriceps power on the first three postoperative days (all P < 0.05). They also had significantly longer walking distance on postoperative day 1 [7.8 m ([95% CI, 0.85 to 14.7), P = 0.023] with less assistance during walking on the first two postoperative days (all P < 0.029) and significantly better quality-of-recovery scores on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.018). There were significant dose-dependent trends between all the above parameters and dexamethasone dose (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the incidence of chronic pain or knee function 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone 16 mg given before total knee arthroplasty led to a reduction in postoperative pain, less opioid consumption, stronger quadriceps muscle power, better mobilisation and better overall quality-of-recovery after operation. No long-term improvement in reduction in pain and function of the knee was found.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02767882.

Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.

Type 2 diabetes and cancer: problems and suggestions for best patient management

Diabetes and cancer are widespread worldwide and the number of subjects presenting both diseases increased over the years. The management of cancer patients having diabetes represents a challenge not only because of the complexity and heterogeneity of these pathologies but also for the lack of standardised clinical guidelines. The diagnosis of cancer is traumatizing and monopolizes the attention of both patients and caregivers. Thus, pre-existent or new-onset diabetes can be overshadowed thus increasing the risk for short- and long-term adverse events. Moreover, drugs used for each disease can interfere with the clinical course of the concomitant disease, making challenging the management of these patients. Over the years, this issue has become more relevant because of the increased patients’ life expectancy due to the improved efficacy of diabetes and cancer therapies. The purpose of this review is to highlight what is known and what should be taken into consideration to optimise the clinical management of patients with diabetes and cancer. Due to the complexity of these diseases, a multidisciplinary, shared approach, including all the protagonists involved, is necessary to improve patients’ quality of life and lifespan.

Effects of Single Dose of Dexamethasone on Perioperative Blood Glucose Levels in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Supratentorial Tumors - An Observational Study

Introduction:

Dexamethasone is commonly administered in intracranial tumors to reduce the cerebral edema. Its administration may be associated with hyperglycemia. The primary objective of this study was to study the magnitude of rise in blood sugar levels following the administration of a single 10 mg dose of dexamethasone.

Methods:

Seventy patients who underwent various neurosurgical procedures were enrolled in the study. Group D (n = 35 undergoing surgery for intracranial tumors) were administered injection dexamethasone 10 mg while as Group P (n = 35 undergoing surgery for subarachnoid hemorrhage) received placebo. Blood samples were obtained through the arterial line at baseline (before dexamethasone administration), 60, 120, 180, and 240 min after the dexamethasone administration and blood glucose concentrations noted.

Results:

Glucose concentrations were significantly increased in patients who received dexamethasone compared with those who received placebo (P < 0.05). Blood glucose concentrations at different time intervals were greater when compared with the baseline blood sugar levels in both the placebo and dexamethasone group (P < 0.05). The arterial blood glucose concentration in those who received 10 mg dexamethasone (n = 35) increased from 95.29 ± 13.69 mg.dl⁻¹ to 139.97 ± 10.34 mg.dl⁻¹ over 4 h, compared with a change from 94.74 ± 10.05 mg.dl⁻¹ to 122.34 ± 10.68 mg.dl⁻¹ in those who received placebo (n = 35) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The administration of a single intravenous dose of 10-mg dose dexamethasone caused a significant increase in the blood glucose concentrations at different point intervals when compared with the placebo over a 4-h period. We recommend intensive monitoring of the blood sugar levels during the intraoperative period to prevent the development of severe hyperglycemia and its associated complications.

Evidence-based prophylaxis strategies for postoperative nausea and vomiting when considering ethnicity factor

In most western countries, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an important issue and prophylaxis guideline for PONV will be followed in clinical practice. We tried to conduct a review study and a local study to elucidate the incidence and severity of PONV to see if considering ethnicity factor, should we still need to follow those prophylaxis guidelines from western countries. The PubMed, and MEDLINE were consulted from January 2000 to 2018 and also Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2010). The key word for searching is PONV (incidence, severity and prevention strategy), without language limitation and focus on Asian countries. The results showed that the overall incidence and severity of PONV in Asian countries was less significant than in western countries. PONV in western countries could be a serious issue and prophylaxis strategy adjusted by Apfel score could be adopted in routine practice. After this review consultation, the issue of PONV in different ethnic countries (including Taiwan) might be over emphasized and we may suggest not to follow west countries PONV prophylaxis guideline as our routine practice.

The perioperative administration of dexamethasone and infection (PADDI) trial protocol: rationale and design of a pragmatic multicentre non-inferiority study

INTRODUCTION

The intraoperative administration of dexamethasone for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common and recommended practice. The safety of the administration of this immunosuppressive agent at a time of significant immunological disruption has not been rigorously evaluated in terms of infective complications.

METHODS/ANALYSIS

This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 8880 patients undergoing elective major surgery will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either dexamethasone 8 mg or placebo intravenously following the induction of anaesthesia in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre and diabetes status. Patient enrolment into the trial is ongoing. The primary outcome is surgical site infection at 30 days following surgery, defined according to the Centre for Disease Control criteria.

ETHICS/DISSEMINATION

The PADDI trial has been approved by the ethics committees of over 45 participating sites in Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, South Africa and the Netherlands. The trial has been endorsed by the Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Clinical Trials Network and the Australian Society for Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network. Participant recruitment began in March 2016 and is expected to be complete in mid-2019. Publication of the results of the PADDI trial is anticipated to occur in early 2020.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12614001226695.

Steroid-induced dysglycaemia in patients with haematological disorders a ten-year review in a tertiary hospital in Ghana

Background

Glucocorticoids (steroids) play a key role in the management of multiple medical conditions including haematological disorders. This study looked at the prevalence of steroid induced dysglycaemia in patients with haematological disorders receiving steroids as part of their treatment with the view of modifying its use and selection of patients where necessary.

Methods

A retrospective review of haematology patients on treatment regimens including steroids. Information extracted included, demographic characteristics, clinical information such as age, gender, haematological disorder, type of steroid, daily and cumulative dose of steroid, duration of therapy, family history of diabetes and alcohol use.

Results

The case records of 351 haematology patients were reviewed. However, eight patients with dysglycaemia before therapy were excluded. The median age of patients was 51.0 ± 26.0(IQR: Interquartile Range) years, with an age range of 13 to 87 years, and a female: male ratio of 1.2: 1 (p= 0.778). The prevalence of Steroid-Induced Dysglycaemia (SID) was 3.79% with a mean diagnosis interval of 8.8 + 2.1 months. Overall, 245 (71.4%) patients were on continuous steroids. Among the 13 patients who developed SID, 11 (84.6%) were on continuous steroids. In the majority of the patients (97.1%) there was no family history of diabetes in a first degree relative. Significant differences were found between patients with normoglycaemia and those with dysglycaemia with respect to age (p=0.049) and duration of steroid therapy (p=0.024).

Conclusion

The prevalence of steroid-induced dysglycaemia is relatively low among Ghanaian patients with haematological disorders on steroid based chemotherapy.

Funding

None declared

Effects of Intraoperative Dexamethasone Administration in Adult Diabetic Burn Patients

The steroid dexamethasone is used intraoperatively to prevent postoperative nausea. Studies of intraoperative steroid use in diabetic patients have shown conflicting effects on blood glucose and complications, and their use has not yet been studied in the burn population. A review of adult diabetic acute burn patients undergoing surgery at a verified burn center from 2012 to 2017 was conducted. Statistical analysis compared those who did and did not receive an intraoperative steroid. A total of 74 patients who underwent 121 operations were identified; steroid was administered in 14.0% of cases. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative glucose, insulin requirements, TBSA, or hemoglobin A1C. Postoperatively, the steroid group had a 16.7 mg/dl (SD = 11.1) increase in blood glucose (P = .042) and 53.5 unit/24 hour (SD = 28.4) increase in insulin requirement (P = .019), compared with no change in controls. The complication rate in the steroid group was 52.9% compared with 20.1% in controls (P = .003); partial graft loss was the most common complication. Diabetic burn patients who receive intraoperative steroid have increased postoperative blood glucose levels, insulin requirements, and complication rates compared with patients who do not receive steroids. Discussion is warranted to avoid intraoperative steroid in this population.

The effect of diabetes mellitus on in-hospital hyperglycemia, length of stay and survival in patients with brain tumor receiving dexamethasone: A descriptive and comparative analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a comparative analysis on the impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) on in-hospital hyperglycemia, length of stay (LOS) and survival of patients suffering from brain tumor who receive dexamethasone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with brain tumor hospitalized in a Neurosurgery department between 2011 and 2018, were studied. Data referring to medical history, clinical characteristics and in-hospital survival was collected and analyzed. Morning plasma glucose levels (PGL) were obtained for seven consecutive days after the start of dexamethasone.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were identified. Of them, 21 (37.5%) were diabetic. During dexamethasone administration, a difference in morning PGL values during different days was noted (p = 0.003). No difference in glucose levels among different glucocorticoid doses was seen. DM was associated with higher average PGL (aMPGL), calculated as the mean of morning PGL values for the last six days (p = 0.001) and with higher rates of persistent hyperglycemia (p = 0.002). The change of aMPGL from the morning PGL value of day one did not differ between the two cohorts (p = 0.729). DM neither affected LOS nor in-hospital survival (p = 0.745 & p = 0.438, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although morning glucose values were higher in diabetic, compared to non-diabetic patients, their change from day one was similar between the two cohorts. LOS and in-hospital survival were not affected by DM.

Management of hyperglycaemia in persons with non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus who are started on systemic glucocorticoid therapy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

What is the most effective pharmacological intervention for glycaemic control in known type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) without prior insulin treatment and newly started on systemic glucocorticoid therapy?

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic literature review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases and Google for articles from 2002 to July 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We combined search terms relating to DM (patients, >16 years of age), systemic glucocorticoids, glycaemic control, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We screened and evaluated articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight of 2365 articles met full eligibility criteria. Basal-bolus insulin (BBI) strategy for patients under systemic glucocorticoid therapy was comparatively effective but provided insufficient glucose control, depending on time of day. BBI strategy with long-acting insulin and neutral protamin Hagedorn as basal insulin provided similar overall glycaemic control. Addition of various insulin strategies to standard BBI delivered mixed results. Intermediate-acting insulin (IMI) as additional insulin conferred no clear benefits, and glycaemic control with sliding scale insulin was inferior to BBI or IMI. No studies addressed whether anticipatory or compensatory insulin adjustments are better for glycaemic control.

CONCLUSION

The lack of suitably designed RCTs and observational studies, heterogeneity of interventions, target glucose levels and glucose monitoring, poor control of DM subgroups and low to moderate quality of evidence render identification of optimal pharmacological interventions for glycaemic control and insulin management difficult. Even findings on the widely recommended BBI regimen as intensive insulin therapy for patients with DM on glucocorticoids are inconclusive. High-quality evidence from studies with well-defined DM phenotypes, settings and treatment approaches is needed to determine optimal pharmacological intervention for glycaemic control.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015024739.

Dexamethasone and postoperative hyperglycemia in diabetics undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty: a case control study in 238 patients

Background

Dexamethasone has been routinely used in the pre-operative setting to enhance analgesia and decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing primary arthroplasty. However, dexamethasone has the potential to increase blood glucose levels postoperatively, which is a known risk factor for complications after total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of dexamethasone administration on post-operative blood glucose levels in diabetic patients after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of 238 diabetic patients who underwent primary hip and knee arthroplasty between May 1, 2014 and September 30, 2016 at a single urban academic medical center. A total of 77 patients (32.4%) received dexamethasone and 161 (67.7%) did not. Oral hyperglycemic agents were held during the inpatient stay and blood glucose was controlled either with sliding scale insulin or home insulin regimens were continued. All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, gender, type of diabetes, pre-operative diabetic medication, type of surgical procedure, and pre-operative HgbA1c level. The primary outcome was post-operative hyperglycemia within 72 h of surgery defined as any blood glucose level greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL.

Results

Post-operative hyperglycemia was observed in 17.1 and 20.6% of the measurements during the first 24 and 72 h respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, patients who received dexamethasone had 4.07 (95% CI: 2.46, 6.72) and 3.08 (95% CI: 2.34, 4.04) higher odds of post-operative hyperglycemia in the first 24 and 72 h respectively.

Conclusions

Dexamethasone administration in diabetic patients undergoing primary arthroplasty increases post-operative hyperglycemia during the first 24 and 72 h. While our data did not investigate causation, dexamethasone use in this patient population should be thoughtfully considered, as post-operative hyperglycemia is a known risk factor for complications.

Effect of high-dose dexamethasone on patients without diabetes during elective neurosurgery: a prospective study

Introduction

The peri-operative use of high-dose dexamethasone to reduce cerebral oedema may result in worsening glycaemic control in people with diabetes and glucocorticoid-induced diabetes in susceptible individuals. This study aims to examine the incidence of glucocorticoid-induced diabetes in a cohort of neurosurgical patients receiving high-dose dexamethasone peri-operatively.

Materials and methods

Adult non-diabetic neurosurgical patients receiving high-dose dexamethasone were prospectively studied. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, HbA1c > 6.0%, and use of anti-diabetes therapies. The following data were collected: Family history of diabetes, body mass index, fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and HbA1c (prior to surgery and 6 weeks after last dose of dexamethasone). Homeostatic model assessment values were calculated. Peri-operative glucose readings were recorded and 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests performed at the end of 6 weeks. Paired student t tests and multiple linear regressions were used.

Results

Data from 21 participants (11 women) were available. The mean total dose of dexamethasone was 96 ± 34 mg, and treatment duration was 17 ± 7 days. A total of 105 random blood glucose levels were documented peri-operatively (mean 7.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L). Six weeks following cessation of dexamethasone course, none of the participants developed diabetes, defined either by fasting glucose or by 75 g OGTT. There was a statistically significant increase in the mean HOMA-β from 81.5 to 102.1% (p = 0.01) and a significant decrease in the mean fasting glucose from 5.7 to 4.8 mmol/L (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The use of high-dose dexamethasone in this cohort of neurosurgical patients did not result in glucocorticoid-induced diabetes. Hyperglycaemia was transient and had resolved by 6 weeks.

What is new in the battle against postoperative nausea and vomiting?

The issue of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) still poses a significant burden on our patients. Although rarely associated with a life-threatening condition, it is consistently considered as one of the most undesirable side effects of surgery and anesthesia. There are well-established risk factors for the development of PONV that include patient-related factors, anesthetic technique, use of volatile anesthetics, use of nitrous oxide, duration of anesthesia, opioid administration, and type of surgery. Because pharmacologic interventions for PONV are not without risks, practitioners must assess patient's risk status from low to high and consider the benefits of treatment. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge related to PONV and provides a practical approach toward risk assessment, prevention, and numerous treatment strategies.

Minimum Effective dose of Dexamethasone in Combination with Midazolam as Prophylaxis against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background:

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affects 20% and 30% of patients. As many as 60%–80% patients at high risk may be affected. Dexamethasone (D) and midazolam (M) are well studied as antiemetic. Use of D can be associated with certain undesirable side effects so minimum dose is preferred. M is a routinely used premedicant. Hence, this study was designed with both D and M in high risk patients for PONV to find minimum effective dose of D.

Aims:

To determine the minimum dose of D that combined with M would provide effective prophylaxis of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients at high risk for PONV.

Setting and Design:

This is a prospective, randomized double-blind trial.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred and fifty-five patients scheduled for elective LC were randomized to 5 groups of 31 each. Group C was given normal saline, and the rest were administered D 1 mg (group MD1), 2 mg (group MD2), 4 mg (group MD4), or 8 mg (group MD8) in combination with 0.04 mg/kg M at induction. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, severity of nausea, and the use of rescue antiemetic and postoperative pain was analyzed.

Statistical Analysis:

Chi-square test was used to compare incidence of study variables. Independent Student's t-test was used for continuous variables. Demographic data were compared using ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The incidence of nausea was significantly lower in group MD4 (29%) and MD8 (6%) compared to placebo group (71%) (P < 0.001) and of vomiting was significantly lower in groups of MD2 (58%), MD4 (48%), and MD8 (6%) compared with placebo (90%) (P < 0.001) at 24 h. There was significant reduction in nausea, pain severity, and incidence of use of rescue antiemetic in MD4 and MD8 groups with no discernable side effects of the drugs.

Conclusion:

We conclude that 4 mg D with M and 2 mg D with M is effective for prevention of nausea and vomiting, respectively, in patients at high risk for PONV undergoing LC.

A prospective randomized study on the impact of low-dose dexamethasone on perioperative blood glucose concentrations in diabetics and nondiabetics

Background:

Dexamethasone is a potent corticosteroid when administered alone or in combination alone has proven efficacious in preventing nausea and vomiting (PONV) perioperatively. However, the administration of even a single dose has been associated with hyperglycemia. This is the first study that evaluates the effect of two low-doses of dexamethasone (4 and 8 mg) on blood glucose concentrations among diabetics and nondiabetics in patients who have received spinal anesthesia.

Materials and Methods:

After obtaining ethical clearance and patient consent, 180 American Society of Anesthesiologists 1–3 patients undergoing the elective infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anesthesia aged between 18 and 70 years were included in this study. Ninety diabetic patients were allotted to the diabetic group (DM), and ninety nondiabetic patients were allotted to the nondiabetic group (ND). Group DM was divided into three subgroups DM0, DM4, and DM8. Group ND was divided into three subgroups ND0, ND4, and ND8. The patients in groups DM0 and ND0 served as controls. The patients in groups DM4 and ND4 received 4 mg dexamethasone. The patients in groups DM8 and ND8 received 8 mg dexamethasone. The blood glucose concentrations were monitored at 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 h after giving the drug.

Results:

The baseline blood glucose values were higher in diabetics compared to nondiabetics (128.57 ± 22.26 vs 94.99 ± 12.82 mg/dL). There was a statistically significant increase in blood glucose concentrations in both diabetics and nondiabetics who received dexamethasone. The rise of blood glucose from baseline was similar in both diabetics and nondiabetics.

Conclusion:

The maximum rise in blood glucose was in the range of 40–45 mg/dl in the patients who received dexamethasone. The clinician should use his clinical judgment before administering dexamethasone for PONV prophylaxis/treatment.

Perioperative Management of Patients with Diabetes

Hyperglycemia has long been recognized to have detrimental effects on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. The manifestations of uncontrolled diabetes are manifold and can include risk of hyperglycemic crises, postoperative infection, poor wound healing, and increased mortality. There is substantial literature supporting the role of diligent glucose control in the prevention of adverse surgical outcomes, but considerable debate remains as to the optimal glucose targets. Hence, most organizations advocate the avoidance of hypoglycemia while striving for adequate glucose control in the perioperative period. These objectives can be accomplished with careful preoperative evaluation, clear patient instructions the day of surgery, frequent blood glucose monitoring during the perioperative period, and use of effective strategies for insulin initiation and titration. This article highlights the major issues concerning patients with diabetes undergoing surgery and reviews the management recommendations put forth by general consensus guidelines and expert opinion.

Dexamethasone versus standard treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting in gastrointestinal surgery: randomised controlled trial (DREAMS Trial)

Objectives To determine whether preoperative dexamethasone reduces postoperative vomiting in patients undergoing elective bowel surgery and whether it is associated with other measurable benefits during recovery from surgery, including quicker return to oral diet and reduced length of stay.Design Pragmatic two arm parallel group randomised trial with blinded postoperative care and outcome assessment.Setting 45 UK hospitals.Participants 1350 patients aged 18 or over undergoing elective open or laparoscopic bowel surgery for malignant or benign pathology.Interventions Addition of a single dose of 8 mg intravenous dexamethasone at induction of anaesthesia compared with standard care.Main outcome measures Primary outcome: reported vomiting within 24 hours reported by patient or clinician.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

vomiting with 72 and 120 hours reported by patient or clinician; use of antiemetics and postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24, 72, and 120 hours rated by patient; fatigue and quality of life at 120 hours or discharge and at 30 days; time to return to fluid and food intake; length of hospital stay; adverse events.Results 1350 participants were recruited and randomly allocated to additional dexamethasone (n=674) or standard care (n=676) at induction of anaesthesia. Vomiting within 24 hours of surgery occurred in 172 (25.5%) participants in the dexamethasone arm and 223 (33.0%) allocated standard care (number needed to treat (NNT) 13, 95% confidence interval 5 to 22; P=0.003). Additional postoperative antiemetics were given (on demand) to 265 (39.3%) participants allocated dexamethasone and 351 (51.9%) allocated standard care (NNT 8, 5 to 11; P<0.001). Reduction in on demand antiemetics remained up to 72 hours. There was no increase in complications.Conclusions Addition of a single dose of 8 mg intravenous dexamethasone at induction of anaesthesia significantly reduces both the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 hours and the need for rescue antiemetics for up to 72 hours in patients undergoing large and small bowel surgery, with no increase in adverse events.Trial registration EudraCT (2010-022894-32) and ISRCTN (ISRCTN21973627).

American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on optimal analgesia within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery: part 1-from the preoperative period to PACU

Background

Within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP), the approach to treating pain should be multifaceted and the goal should be to deliver “optimal analgesia,” which we define in this paper as a technique that optimizes patient comfort and facilitates functional recovery with the fewest medication side effects.

Methods

With input from a multi-disciplinary, international group of clinicians, and through a structured review of the literature and use of a modified Delphi method, we achieved consensus surrounding the topic of optimal analgesia in the perioperative period for colorectal surgery patients.

Discussion

As a part of the first Perioperative Quality Improvement (POQI) workgroup meeting, we sought to develop a consensus document describing a comprehensive, yet rational and practical, approach for developing an evidence-based plan for achieving optimal analgesia, specifically for a colorectal surgery ERP. The goal was two-fold: (a) that application of this process would lead to improved patient outcomes and (b) that investigation of the questions raised would identify knowledge gaps to aid the direction for research into analgesia within ERPs in the years to come. This document details the evidence for a wide range of analgesic components, with particular focus from the preoperative period to the post-anesthesia care unit. The overall conclusion is that the combination of analgesic techniques employed in the perioperative period is not important as long as it is effective in delivering the goal of optimal analgesia as set forth in this document.

Pharmacology of Acetaminophen, Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs, and Steroid Medications: Implications for Anesthesia or Unique Associated Risks

Acetaminophen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroids, historically used in perioperative management, are potent analgesic medications. They primarily inhibit the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme, decreasing the synthesis of prostaglandins, and modulating pain and temperature. Acetaminophen does not inhibit this synthesis at the inflammatory site. The primary mechanism of action of corticosteroids involves regulation of nuclear expression of genes involved in inflammatory pathways and other systemic effects. Metaanalyses have added purposeful perioperative indications, clarified misconceptions, and established protocols for administering these drugs. Some indications, doses, clinical considerations, and adverse effects need to be further studied.

Dexamethasone and perioperative blood glucose in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: A retrospective study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Perioperative dexamethasone is commonly used to prevent nausea. It can also increase blood glucose levels, and recent concern about its blood glucose-elevating effect in humans has been raised. This study aimed to demonstrate relationships between dexamethasone administration and elevated perioperative blood glucose in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Academic, orthopedic hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 625 patients (18-99years) who underwent total hip or total knee arthroplasty with an ASA ≤3 were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients who received dexamethasone perioperatively were compared to those who did not receive dexamethasone.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome, which was any postoperative glucose >200mg/dl, was compared between groups using multiple logistic regression. Demographic information, intraoperative information, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, white blood cell count, medication use, and length of stay were also collected.

MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative dexamethasone (median [1st quartile, 3rd quartile] dose=4 [4, 8] mg) was administered to 76% of patients. Only 5.6% (95% CI: 3.8-7.5) of patients had postoperative glucose levels >200mg/dl. After covariate adjustment, there was no evidence of a difference in odds of experiencing postoperative glucose levels >200mg/dl (odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.76 [0.28-2.07]; P=0.594) and maximum glucose levels (P=0.518) between groups. Dexamethasone-treated patients had greater changes in white blood cell count between baseline and postoperative days 0-1. There was no evidence of a difference in wound healing and length of stay between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of an association between perioperative dexamethasone administration and the odds of having postoperative glucose levels >200mg/dl or higher maximum glucose levels. However, these findings may not be generalizable to patients having different baseline characteristics or procedures.

Weekly nab-Paclitaxel in Combination With Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Diabetes

PURPOSE

To examine outcomes in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin (nab-P/C) versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin (sb-P/C) in a subset of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received nab-P 100 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 or sb-P 200 mg/m² on day 1, both with C at an area under the curve of 6 mg·min/mL on day 1 every 3 weeks. Overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by blinded, independent, centralized review. P values were based on chi-square test for ORR and log-rank test for overall survival (OS) and PFS.

RESULTS

Of the 1052 randomized patients in the phase 3 trial, 61 had diabetes according to prespecified terms (nab-P/C, 31; sb-P/C, 30). ORR for nab-P/C versus sb-P/C in this subset was 52% versus 27% (relative risk ratio, 1.935; P = .046), median PFS was 10.9 versus 4.9 months (hazard ratio, 0.420; P = .016), and median OS was 17.5 versus 11.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.550; P = .057). Treatment differences in PFS remained significant (P ≤ .036) after adjusting for histology, region, stage, race, and age and also remained significant in OS for histology (P = .039). Patients with diabetes experienced lower rates of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy and higher rates of thrombocytopenia and anemia with nab-P/C versus sb-P/C.

CONCLUSION

nab-P/C demonstrated improved efficacy and manageable tolerability in patients with advanced NSCLC and diabetes.

Increased glycogen synthase kinase-3β and hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in adipose tissue may contribute to glucocorticoid-induced mouse visceral adiposity

BACKGROUND

Increased adiposity in visceral depots is a crucial feature associated with glucocorticoid (GC) excess. The action of GCs in target tissue is regulated by GC receptor (GR) and 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11ß-HSD1) coupled with hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (H6pdh). Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) is known to be a crucial mediator of ligand-dependent gene transcription. We hypothesized that the major effects of corticosteroids on adipose fat accumulation are in part medicated by changes in GSK3β and H6pdh.

METHODS

We characterized the alterations of GSK3β and GC metabolic enzymes, and determined the impact of GR antagonist mifepristone on obesity-related genes and the expression of H6pdh and 11ß-HSD1 in adipose tissue of mice exposed to excess GC as well as in in vitro studies using 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with GCs.

RESULTS

Corticosterone (CORT) exposure increased abdominal fat mass and induced expression of lipid synthase ACC and ACL with activation of GSK3β phosphorylation in abdominal adipose tissue of C57BL/6J mice. Increased pSer⁹ GSK3β was correlated with induction of H6pdh and 11ß-HSD1. Additionally, mifepristone treatment reversed the production of H6pdh and attenuated CORT-mediated production of 11ß-HSD1 and lipogenic gene expression with reduction of pSer⁹ GSK3β, thereby leading to improvement of phenotype of adiposity within adipose tissue in mice treated with excess GCs. Suppression of pSer⁹ GSK3β by mifepristone was accompanied by activation of pThr³⁰⁸ Akt and blockade of CORT-induced adipogenic transcriptor C/EBPα and PPARγ. In addition, mifepristone also attenuated CORT-mediated activation of IRE1α/XBP1. Additionally, reduction of H6pdh by shRNA showed comparable effects to mifepristone on attenuating CORT-induced expression of GC metabolic enzymes and improved lipid accumulation in vitro in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that elevated adipose GSK3β and H6pdh expression contribute to 11ß-HSD1 mediating hypercortisolism associated with visceral adiposity.

Evaluation of hyperglycaemic response to intra-operative dexamethasone administration in patients undergoing elective intracranial surgery: A randomised, prospective study

Background and Aim:

The glucocorticoid dexamethasone in a bolus dose of 8-10 mg followed by quarterly dose of 4 mg is commonly used during intracranial surgery so as to reduce oedema and vascular permeability. However, the detrimental hyperglycaemic effects of dexamethasone may override its potentially beneficial effects. The present prospective, randomised study aimed at comparing the degree and magnitude of hyperglycaemia induced by prophylactic administration of dexamethasone in patients undergoing elective craniotomy.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade-I and II patients were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 patients each. Group-I received dexamethasone during surgery for the first time. Group-II received dexamethasone in addition to receiving it pre-operatively, whereas Group-III (control group) patients were administered normal saline as placebo. Baseline blood glucose (BG) was measured in all the three groups before induction of anaesthesia and thereafter after every hour for 4 h and then two-hourly. Besides intra- and intergroup comparison of BG, peak BG concentration was also recorded for each patient. Statistical analysis was carried out with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test and value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Baseline BG reading were higher and statistically significant in Group-II as compared with Group-I and Group-III (P < 0.05). However, peak BG levels were significantly higher in Group-I than in Group-II and III (P < 0.05). Similarly, the magnitude of change in peak BG was significantly higher in Group-I as compared to Group-II and III (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Peri-operative administration of dexamethasone during neurosurgical procedures can cause significant increase in BG concentration especially in patients who receive dexamethasone intra-operatively only.