Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the short-acting sedative CNS 7056 in sheep

An ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine in thalamic nucleus reuniens undermines fear extinction via intermediation of hippocamposeptal circuits

Benzodiazepines, commonly used for anxiolytics, hinder conditioned fear extinction, and the underlying circuit mechanisms are unclear. Utilizing remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, here we reveal its impact on the thalamic nucleus reuniens (RE) and interconnected hippocamposeptal circuits during fear extinction. Systemic or RE-specific administration of remimazolam impedes fear extinction by reducing RE activation through A type GABA receptors. Remimazolam enhances long-range GABAergic inhibition from lateral septum (LS) to RE, underlying the compromised fear extinction. RE projects to ventral hippocampus (vHPC), which in turn sends projections characterized by feed-forward inhibition to the GABAergic neurons of the LS. This is coupled with long-range GABAergic projections from the LS to RE, collectively constituting an overall positive feedback circuit construct that promotes fear extinction. RE-specific remimazolam negates the facilitation of fear extinction by disrupting this circuit. Thus, remimazolam in RE disrupts fear extinction caused by hippocamposeptal intermediation, offering mechanistic insights for the dilemma of combining anxiolytics with extinction-based exposure therapy.

Validation of the anesthetic effect of a mixture of remimazolam, medetomidine, and butorphanol in three mouse strains

Proper administration of anesthesia is indispensable for the ethical treatment of lab animals in biomedical research. Therefore, selecting an effective anesthesia protocol is pivotal for the design and success of experiments. Hence, continuous development and refinement of anesthetic agents are imperative to improve research outcomes and elevate animal welfare. "Balanced anesthesia" involves using multiple drugs to optimize efficacy while minimizing side effects. The medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol, called MMB, and medetomidine, alfaxalone, and butorphanol, called MAB, are popular in Japan. However, the drawbacks of midazolam, including its extended recovery time, and the narrow safety margin of MAB, have prompted research for suitable alternatives. This study replaced midazolam in the MMB combination with remimazolam (RMZ), which is noted for its ultra-short half-life. The resulting combination, called MRB, was effective in providing a wider safety margin compared to MAB while maintaining an anesthesia depth equivalent level to that of MMB in mice. Notably, MRB consistently exhibited better recovery scores after antagonist administration in contrast to MMB. Furthermore, the re-sedation phenomenon observed with MMB was not observed with MRB. The rapid metabolism of RMZ enables reliable anesthesia induction, circumventing the complications linked to MAB. Overall, MRB excelled in providing extended surgical anesthesia and swift post-antagonist recovery. These results highlight the potential of RMZ for broader animal research applications.

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends in Remimazolam-Related Research Over the Past 15 Years: Compared with Propofol

Purpose

Although remimazolam is a popular novel anesthetic, there is a lack of data in the literature about current and future trends. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore emerging trends and potential hotspots of remimazolam research over the past 15 years through bibliometric methods.

Methods

Relevant articles on remimazolam published from 2007 to 2022 and propofol from 1997 to 2001 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data were collected using Microsoft Excel and graphs were generated with the Bibliometrix package in R software. Visual bibliometric maps were created using VOS viewer and CiteSpace software.

Results

In total, 184 articles were included for analysis. Remimazolam-related research tended to increase, especially from 2020 to 2022. China produced the most publications (327), whereas the USA dominated in quality (h-index = 16). Among institutions, PAION Deutschland GmbH produced the most articles (Np = 21). Similar to initial research and development of propofol, the hotspots of remimazolam research have extended beyond pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to adverse reactions, clinical scenarios, specific populations, and compatible regimens, as confirmed by high numbers of common references and keywords.

Conclusion

Remimazolam research has developed rapidly over the past two years. Remimazolam can achieve faster onset and recovery, and more stable hemodynamics than midazolam or propofol, enabling gradual piloting of applications from endoscopy and general anesthesia to sedation of critical care patients; foreseeing specific population (patients with hepatic or renal impairment and reduced cardiovascular reserve, the elderly, and children) through compatible anesthetics regimens to more optimal and safe. Future studies of remimazolam are likely to include adverse reactions, effects on different organ systems, and identification of monitoring indicators.

The use of remimazolam versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The primary objective of this study was to compare the risk of hypotension, as well as the induction and recovery characteristics between remimazolam and propofol in patients receiving surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: The Embase, Medline, Google scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to March 2022 for randomized controlled trials The primary outcome was the risk of post-induction hypotension between the two agents, while the secondary outcomes included anesthetic depth, induction efficacy, time to loss of consciousness (LOC), hemodynamic profiles, time to eye opening, extubation time as well as the incidence of injection pain and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV). Results: Meta-analysis of eight studies published from 2020 to 2022 involving 738 patients revealed a significantly lower risk of post-induction hypotension with the use of remimazolam compared to that with propofol [risk ratio (RR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43 to 0.75, p < 0.0001, I2 = 12%, five studies, 564 patients]. After anesthetic induction, the anesthetic depth measured by bispectral index (BIS) was lighter in the remimazolam group than that in the propofol group (MD = 9.26, 95% confidence interval: 3.06 to 15.47, p = 0.003, I2 = 94%, five studies, 490 patients). The time to loss of consciousness was also longer in the former compared to the latter (MD = 15.49 s, 95%CI: 6.53 to 24.46, p = 0.0007, I2 = 61%, three studies, 331 patients). However, the use of remimazolam correlated with a lower risk of injection pain (RR = 0.03, 95%CI: 0.01 to 0.16, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%, three studies, 407 patients) despite comparable efficacy of anesthetic induction (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.9 to 1.06, p = 0.57, I2 = 76%, two studies, 319 patients). Our results demonstrated no difference in time to eye opening, extubation time, and risk of PONV between the two groups. Conclusion: Remimazolam was associated with a lower risk of post-induction hypotension after anesthetic induction compared with propofol with similar recovery characteristics. Further studies are required to support our findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Identifier: CRD42022320658.

Remimazolam: An Updated Review of a New Sedative and Anaesthetic

Remimazolam (CNS7056) is a novel benzodiazepine for intravenous sedation; it has an ultra-short duration of action and was recently approved for use in procedural sedation and general anaesthesia. It acts on γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors and is rapidly converted into an inactive metabolite by tissue esterase enzymes. Remimazolam has been successfully used in endoscopic inspection or surgery and general anaesthesia induction and maintenance with fast and predictable onset and recovery times, high procedure success rates, and minor respiratory and hemodynamic fluctuations and without serious drug-related adverse reactions. If needed, the effects of remimazolam can be reversed by flumazenil, which allows prompt termination of sedation. Although remimazolam has great potential for sedation in patients admitted to intensive care units, future studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients requiring sedation for a long period, and numerous studies are warranted to explore the optimal dose in different application scenarios. The review aimed to provide an introduction to the process of remimazolam synthesis and its current clinical uses and future clinical developments.

Remimazolam Requires Less Vasopressor Support during Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center

Introduction

We compared the hemodynamics during general anesthesia with remimazolam and conventional anesthetics in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

This was a retrospective single-center analysis. We reviewed the records of 42 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a transfemoral artery approach under general anesthesia from January to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the general anesthetic used for (induction/maintenance) remimazolam/remimazolam (Group R/R), propofol/sevoflurane (Group P/S), and midazolam/propofol (Group M/P). Vasopressor use (ephedrine, phenylephrine, and noradrenaline) was compared among the groups.

Results

The number of patients in each group was 15 (Group R/R), 13 (Group P/S), and 14 (Group M/P), with no significant difference in background characteristics and intraoperative vital signs. For anesthesia induction, doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine used were significantly lower in Group R/R (ephedrine [mg]: Group R/R 2 [0-4] vs. Group P/S 8 [8-12], P < 0.001, Group R/R vs. Group M/P 5 [0-15], P = 0.39; phenylephrine (mg): Group R/R 0 [0-0.08] vs. Group P/S 0.15 [0.10-0.20], P = 0.03, Group M/P 0.21 [0.04-0.40], P = 0.08). For anesthesia maintenance, the noradrenaline dose used was low in the Group R/R (noradrenaline [μg/kg/min]: Group R/R 0.019 [0.015-0.039], Group P/S 0.042 [0.035-0.045], P = 0.02, Group M/P 0.048 [0.040-0.059], P < 0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with severe AS, induction and maintenance of anesthesia with remimazolam resulted in less overall vasopressor use than conventional general anesthetics.

Moderate sedation by total intravenous remimazolam-alfentanil vs. propofol-alfentanil for third molar extraction: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Oral dental treatment cause anxiety, fear, and physical stress. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of moderate sedation by remimazolam with alfentanil vs. propofol with alfentanil in third molar extraction.

Methods

This single-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial included 100 adults who underwent third molar ambulatory extraction. All patients had continuous infusion of Alfentanil 0.2 μg/kg/min. Group remimazolam with alfentanil (group RA) had an induction dose of 80 μg/kg and maintenance dosage of 5 μg/kg/min. In group propofol with alfentanil (PA group), propofol was infused at an initial concentration of 1.8 μg/mL under target controlled infusion (TCI) mode and a maintenance concentration of 1.5 μg/mL. The incidence rates of adverse effects were recorded and compared. Depth of sedation was assessed using the modified observer alertness/sedation assessment (MOAA/S) and entropy index. Recovery characteristics were recorded and complications observed for next 24 h.

Results

The incident of adverse events 6 (12%) in the group RA was lower than the group PA 25 (50%) [Mean difference 0.136 (95%CI, 0.049–0.377); P &lt; 0.05], with no serious adverse events during the sedation procedure. The incidence of injection pain in group RA was significantly lower than that in group PA [4 vs. 26%, mean difference 0.119 (95%CI, 0.025–0.558); P = 0.004]. Before starting local anesthesia, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate of the PA group were lower than those of the RA group. None of the patients required further treatments for a decreased heart rate, blood pressure, or low SpO2. The rate of moderate sedation success was 100% in both groups. The MOAA/S score was similar between the groups indicating that the depth of sedation was effective. Group RA had significantly shorter recovery and discharge times than those of group PA.

Conclusions

Remimazolam with alfentanil is a safer and more effective alternative for ambulatory sedation and can reduce recovery and discharge time and the incidence of perioperative adverse events compare with propofol.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifier: ChiCTR2200058106.

Differential effects of remimazolam and propofol on heart rate variability during anesthesia induction

PURPOSE

The effects of remimazolam on autonomic nervous activity have not been elucidated. We investigated the differential effects of remimazolam and propofol on autonomic nervous activity during anesthesia induction.

METHODS

Thirty patients were randomly divided into a remimazolam group or a propofol group for anesthesia induction. Hemodynamics and indices of heart rate variability were recorded before and after anesthesia. Low frequency power (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz, ms²) and high frequency power (HF; 0.15-0.4 Hz, ms²) were calculated from power spectral density of heart rate variability. LF reflects both sympathetic and parasympathetic activities and HF reflects parasympathetic activity. To investigate the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activities, the normalized unit (%) of LF (LF nu) and that of HF (HF nu) were calculated. Changes in LF nu (ΔLF nu) before and after anesthesia (ΔLF nu = LF nu at awake-LF nu after anesthesia) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Remimazolam and propofol decreased blood pressure and power spectral density of heart rate variability. Remimazolam did not change LF nu and HF nu, while propofol increased LF nu and decreased HF nu (P = 0.020). ΔLF nu in the remimazolam group (1.4 ± 23.6%) were less than that in the propofol group (19.3 ± 22.4%, P = 0.0415).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam and propofol decreased autonomic nervous activity during anesthesia induction. Remimazolam preserved the balance of sympathetic and parasympathetic activities, while propofol modulated it to sympathetic dominance.

Neurological sedative indicators during general anesthesia with remimazolam

BACKGROUND

The bispectral index (BIS) value during general anesthesia with the newly developed anesthetic remimazolam is reported to be relatively high; however, the reason for this and the appropriate indicator for assessing the sedation level during remimazolam anesthesia have not been determined. In this study, the level of sedation during general anesthesia with remimazolam was evaluated using several different indicators.

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent breast surgery under general anesthesia with remimazolam were included. BIS®, Sedline® and the pupil resting diameters were measured simultaneously. The intraoperative dose of remimazolam was adjusted to obtain a BIS in the range of 40-60; if a BIS < 60 could not be achieved, the intraoperative dose was increased up to the maximal dose of 2 mg/kg/h.

RESULTS

The mean intraoperative BIS and patient state index (PSI) in all patients was 50.6 ± 9.1 and 43.0 ± 11.8, respectively. Five patients showed a mean intraoperative BIS > 60 and eight patients showed mean intraoperative PSI > 50. The mean intraoperative spectral edge frequency (SEF) of BIS® or Sedline® was 15.3 ± 2.5 Hz or 10.6 ± 3.0 Hz, each. The mean intraoperative resting pupil diameter was 1.7 ± 0.2 mm. There were no patients with awareness during anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Processed electroencephalograms (BIS and PSI), and SEF of BIS® were relatively high during anesthesia with remimazolam, but SEF of Sedline® or pupillary diameter could be a supportive indicator to confirm sedation level during remimazolam anesthesia.

Remimazolam: Non-Clinical and Clinical Profile of a New Sedative/Anesthetic Agent

A program to identify novel intravenous sedatives with a short and predictable duration of action was initiated in the late 1990's by Glaxo Wellcome. The program focussed on the identification of ester-based benzodiazepine derivatives that are rapidly broken down by esterases. Remimazolam was identified as one of the lead compounds. The project at Glaxo was shelved for strategic reasons at the late lead optimization stage. Via the GSK ventures initiative, the program was acquired by the small biotechnology company, TheraSci, and, through successive acquisitions, developed as the besylate salt at CeNeS and PAION. The development of remimazolam besylate has been slow by industry standards, primarily because of the resource limitations of these small companies. It has, however, recently been approved for anesthesia in Japan and South Korea, procedural sedation in the United States, China, and Europe, and for compassionate use in intensive care unit sedation in Belgium. A second development program of remimazolam was later initiated in China, using a slightly different salt form, remimazolam tosylate. This salt form of the compound has also recently been approved for procedural sedation in China. Remimazolam has the pharmacological profile of a classical benzodiazepine, such as midazolam, but is differentiated from other intravenous benzodiazepines by its rapid conversion to an inactive metabolite resulting in a short onset/offset profile. It is differentiated from other intravenous hypnotic agents, such as propofol, by its low liability for cardiovascular depression, respiratory depression, and injection pain. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil can reverse the effects of remimazolam in case of adverse events and further shorten recovery times. The aim of this review is to provide an analysis of, and perspective on, published non-clinical and clinical information on 1) the pharmacology, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic profile of remimazolam, 2) the profile of remimazolam compared with established agents, 3) gaps in the current understanding of remimazolam, 4) the compound's discovery and development process and 5) likely future developments in the clinical use of remimazolam.

Soft drugs in anesthesia: remifentanil as prototype to modern anesthetic drug development

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The unique demands of modern anesthesia practice require that medications be effective, well tolerated, and efficient. These attributes are increasingly achieved with the soft drug approach, wherein novel active compounds are specifically designed to be susceptible to rapid biotransformation to inactive metabolites. The present review summarizes the historical background and recent trends in soft drug development in anesthesiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Soft drug development programs for propranadid, etomidate, and benzodiazepine analogues have been undertaken in recent years. Although all three drugs advanced into human trials, neuro-excitatory adverse effects hampered the propranadid and etomidate analogue projects. Remimazolam, the soft benzodiazepine analogue, is at an advanced stage of development, having already received regulatory approval or review in several countries.

SUMMARY

With succinylcholine as the historical forerunner and remifentanil as the modern prototype, the soft drug paradigm continues to hold promise for the future of anesthesia drug development.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam (CNS 7056) after Continuous Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers: Part II. Pharmacodynamics of Electroencephalogram Effects

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam (CNS 7056) is a new ultra-short acting benzodiazepine for IV sedation. This study aimed to investigate the electroencephalogram (EEG) pharmacodynamics of remimazolam infusion.

METHODS

Twenty healthy male volunteers received remimazolam as continuous IV infusion of 5 mg/min for 5 min, 3 mg/min for the next 15 min, and 1 mg/min for further 15 min. Continuous EEG monitoring was performed by a neurophysiologic system with electrodes placed at F3, F4, C3, C4, O1, O2, Cz, and Fp1 (10/20 system) and using the Narcotrend Index. Sedation was assessed clinically by using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale. Pharmacodynamic models were developed for selected EEG variables and Narcotrend Index.

RESULTS

EEG changes during remimazolam infusion were characterized by an initial increase in beta frequency band and a late increase in delta frequency band. The EEG beta ratio showed a prediction probability of Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score of 0.79, and could be modeled successfully using a standard sigmoid Emax model. Narcotrend Index showed a prediction probability of Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score of 0.74. The time course of Narcotrend Index was described by an extended sigmoid Emax model with two sigmoid terms and different plasma-effect equilibration times.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta ratio was identified as a suitable EEG variable for monitoring remimazolam sedation. Narcotrend Index appeared less suitable than the beta ratio for monitoring the sedative effect if remimazolam is administered alone.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in procedural sedation and analgesia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a newly developed benzodiazepine as an alternative of conventional sedatives in the procedure of anesthesia. For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam sedation during an endoscopy, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared remimazolam with midazolam and/or placebo.

METHODS

We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to December 2019 for randomized controlled trials that investigated efficacy and safety of remimazolam during an endoscopy. The job will be performed without language restriction. Experimental groups will include the interventions of remimazolam, while control groups will involve midazolam, placebo, or no controls. The primary outcome will be the onset time, followed by the secondary outcomes of the recovery time, the incidence of hypotension, the incidence of hypoxia and the incidence of bradycardia. Relative ratio or standardized mean difference will be used to measure the effect size of remimazolam. We will use I statistics to assess the between-study heterogeneity in each meta-analysis, Eager's test to detect publication bias.

RESULTS

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

There is no need for ethical approval because all data used in this meta-analysis have been published. In addition, all data will be analyzed anonymously during the review process.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020170745.

Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model-Guided Dosing Optimization of a Novel Sedative HR7056 in Chinese Healthy Subjects

HR7056 is a new benzodiazepine, showing more faster acting onset and recovery than currently available short-acting sedatives. To avoid inadequate anesthesia and predict return of cognition, allowing for immediate neurological evaluation, HR7056 pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were characterized in Chinese healthy subjects. We report on modeling of the data and simulations of dosage regimens for future study. Up to 63 subjects were evaluated, using Bispectral Index (BIS) and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) as pharmacodynamics endpoints. A three-compartment model best described HR7056 pharmacokinetics. Total clearance was 1.49 L min⁻¹, central volume was 2.1 L, inter-compartmental clearances were 0.96 and 0.27 L min⁻¹, respectively. The population mean pharmacodynamic parameters were as follows: BIS, E₀: 95.3; IC₅₀: 503 ng mL⁻¹; γ: 1.5; k_e0: 0.0855 min⁻¹; I_max: 47.9 and MOAA/S, IC₅₀: 436 ng mL⁻¹; γ: 1.5; k_e0: 0.05 min⁻¹; I_max: 27.9. The model simulation will enable maintenance doses to be given more accurately for future study.

Clinical Trial Registration: identifier: NCT01970072

A new method for determining levels of sedation in dogs: A pilot study with propofol and a novel neuroactive steroid anesthetic

BACKGROUND

Different levels of consciousness are required in order to perform different medical procedures. Sedation scales established to objectively define various levels of sedation in humans have not been thoroughly characterized in non-human species. Postural changes in rats or dogs are useful as gross measures of sedation but are inadequate for quantitative assessment since graded levels of sedation are difficult to delineate and obscured by movement abnormalities.

NEW METHOD

A new canine sedation scoring (CSS) method was developed based on the modified observer's assessment of alertness and sedation score (MOAA/S) used in humans. The method employed a combination of physical, auditory and somatosensory stimuli of increasing intensity. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and a neurophysiological measure of sedation (bispectral index: BIS) data were recorded. Validation studies were performed following intravenous loading and constant rate infusion of propofol or a novel synthetic neuroactive steroid (SGE-746).

RESULTS

Four levels of consciousness were identified: 1) Awake, 2) Moderate Sedation (MS), 3) Deep Sedation (DS) and 4) General Anesthesia (GA). Cardiorespiratory measurements obtained after bolus administration of propofol and SGE-746 and at the end of each CRI remained within normal limits. Canine sedation scores correlated with BIS for SGE-746. SGE-746 exhibited a more gradual exposure-response relationship than propofol. Larger increases in the plasma concentration from awake values were required to achieve different levels of sedation with SGE-746 compared to propofol.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

No other canine sedation scoring methods are widely accepted.

CONCLUSION

A CSS method, based on the human MOAA/S scale defined four levels of consciousness in dogs and provided better resolution of sedation depth than BIS alone.

Recent advances in intravenous anesthesia and anesthetics

Anesthesiology, as a field, has made promising advances in the discovery of novel, safe, effective, and efficient methods to deliver care. This review explores refinement in the technology of soft drug development, unique anesthetic delivery systems, and recent drug and device failures.

Metabolite characterization of a novel sedative drug, remimazolam in human plasma and urine using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with synapt high-definition mass spectrometry

Remimazolam is a new chemical entity belonging to the benzodiazepine class of sedative drugs, which shows faster-acting onset and recovery than currently available short-acting sedatives. In the present study, ultra high performance liquid chromatography with synapt high-definition mass spectrometry method combined with MassLynx software was established to characterize metabolites of remimazolam in human plasma and urine. In total, 5 human metabolites were detected, including 3 phase I and 2 phase II metabolites. There was no novel human metabolite detected compared to that in rat. Hydrolysis, glucuronidation and oxidation were the major metabolic reactions. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the human metabolic profile of remimazolam.

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel CNS 7056 Derivatives as Sedatives in Rats and Rabbits

A new water-soluble benzodiazepine derivative, CNS 7056 (named as remimazolam), has been undergoing many reactions in recent years to provide an intravenous agent with a predictable fast-onset, short duration of action, and rapid recovery profile. Based on the structure of CNS 7056 with proven activity, seven new CNS 7056 derivatives were designed, and their sedative activities upon mouse, rats, and rabbits were examined. Sedative activities of EL-001˜007 were screened. The results indicated that the shorter the side chain at C3 position is, the higher the sedative activity is. EL-001 was chosen as the optimal compound for studies of ED50 , LD50 , latency to LRR and the duration of LRR, and its anesthetic activity was compared with that of CNS 7056 in rats and rabbits. Studies showed that EL-001 is a potent sedative in rodent and lagomorpha, with a short duration of action. Compared with CNS 7056, EL-001 has a shorter period of induction despite a slightly longer sedative duration and recovery time.

Remimazolam: The future of its sedative potential

Remimazolam (CNS 7056) is a new drug innovation in anesthesia. It combines the properties of two unique drugs already established in anesthesia - Midazolam and remifentanil. It acts on GABA receptors like midazolam and has organ-independent metabolism like remifentanil. It is likely to be the sedative of the future, as preliminary phase II trials have shown minimal residual effects on prolonged infusions. It has potential to be used as a sedative in ICU and as a novel agent for procedural sedation. Unlike most rapidly acting intravenous sedatives available presently, the propensity to cause apnea is very low. Availability of a specific antagonist (flumazenil) adds to its safety even in cases of overdose. The present review discusses remimazolam's potential as a new drug in anesthesia along with the presently available literary evidence.

Modifying methoxycarbonyl etomidate inter-ester spacer optimizes in vitro metabolic stability and in vivo hypnotic potency and duration of action

BACKGROUND

Methoxycarbonyl etomidate is the prototypical very rapidly metabolized etomidate analog. Initial studies suggest that it may be too short acting for many clinical uses. We hypothesized that its duration of action could be lengthened and clinical utility broadened by incorporating specific aliphatic groups into the molecule to sterically protect its ester moiety from esterase-catalyzed hydrolysis. To test this hypothesis, we developed a series of methoxycarbonyl etomidate analogs (spacer-linked etomidate esters) containing various aliphatic-protecting groups and spacer lengths.

METHODS

Spacer-linked etomidate esters were synthesized and their hypnotic potencies and durations of action following bolus administration were measured in rats using a loss-of-righting reflexes assay. Octanol:water partition coefficients and metabolic half-lives in pooled rat blood were determined chromatographically.

RESULTS

All spacer-linked etomidate esters produced hypnosis rapidly and in a dose-dependent manner. ED50s for loss of righting reflexes ranged from 0.69 ± 0.04 mg/kg for cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate to 11.1 ± 0.8 mg/kg for methoxycarbonyl metomidate. The slope of a plot of the duration of loss of righting reflexes versus the logarithm of the dose ranged 12-fold among spacer-linked etomidate esters, implying widely varying brain clearance rates. The in vitro metabolic half-lives of these compounds in rat blood varied by more than two orders of magnitude and were diastereometrically selective.

CONCLUSIONS

We created 13 new analogs of methoxycarbonyl etomidate and identified two that have significantly higher potency and potentially address the too-brief duration of action for methoxycarbonyl etomidate. This work may provide a blueprint for optimizing the pharmacological properties of other soft drugs.

Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine synergistically potentiate the hypnotic activity of propofol in mice

PURPOSE

Investigation into the characteristics of anesthetic interactions may provide clues to anesthesia mechanisms. Dexmedetomidine, an α(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, has become a popular sedative in intensive care, and hydroxyzine, a histamine receptor antagonist, is well known as a tranquilizing premedication for anesthesia. However, no experimental or pharmacological evaluation has been reported concerning their combination with propofol. Thus, we studied their combined effect with a hypnotic dose of propofol in ddY mice.

METHODS

Male adult mice were intravenously administered either dexmedetomidine (30 μg/kg) or hydroxyzine (5 mg/kg) with propofol (3.75-10 mg/kg) to induce hypnosis, defined as a loss of the righting reflex (LRR). Other mice were intravenously administered propofol, dexmedetomidine (300 μg/kg), or hydroxyzine (50 mg/kg) alone, and subsequent behavioral changes were observed. The 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for LRR was calculated, and the duration of LRR was determined.

RESULTS

The hypnotic dose of propofol was 9.95 ± 1.04 mg/kg (ED(50) ± SEM) without combination. Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine reduced the ED(50) of propofol to 5.32 ± 0.57 and 5.63 ± 0.57 mg/kg, respectively. Coadministration of dexmedetomidine significantly extended LRR duration compared with propofol alone, whereas hydroxyzine significantly shortened LRR duration. A maximal dose of dexmedetomidine or hydroxyzine alone did not induce hypnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine demonstrated no hypnotic action alone; however, their coadministration potentiated the hypnotic activity of propofol. Although reduction in the dose of propofol was similar, only dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of hypnosis.

Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology

GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). The type A GABA receptor (GABA(A)R) system is the primary pharmacological target for many drugs used in clinical anesthesia. The α1, β2, and γ2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs located in the various parts of CNS are thought to be involved in versatile effects caused by inhaled anesthetics and classic benzodiazepines (BZD), both of which are widely used in clinical anesthesiology. During the past decade, the emergence of tonic inhibitory conductance in extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs has coincided with evidence showing that these receptors are highly sensitive to the sedatives and hypnotics used in anesthesia. Anesthetic enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition seems to be preferentially increased in regions shown to be important in controlling memory, awareness, and sleep. This review focuses on the physiology of the GABA(A)Rs and the pharmacological properties of clinically used BZDs. Although classic BZDs are widely used in anesthesiological practice, there is a constant need for new drugs with more favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and fewer side effects. New hypnotics are currently developed, and promising results for one of these, the GABA(A)R agonist remimazolam, have recently been published.