Trauma team

The ABCDE approach: Evaluation of adherence in a low-income country

BACKGROUND

Early recognition and initial treatment of trauma patients prevents deterioration and buys time for making a definitive diagnosis. The "Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability and Exposure" (ABCDE) approach should be used whenever an injury is suspected. It provides quick identification and management of life-threatening problems. Still, there is limited knowledge regarding adherence to the ABCDE approach. This research aims to assess the adherence of the trauma team members to the ABCDE approach in the management of major trauma patients and the factors affecting it.

METHOD

The study is a cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted in the trauma and resuscitation rooms of major governmental hospitals in Khartoum in the period from Jan.30, 2022, to Mar.29, 2022. It was done among the medical staff dealing with major trauma cases. Data were collected by observation using a modified standardized checklist for assessing the ABCDE approach and via a self-administered questionnaire for identifying the factors affecting adherence. Total coverage of all major trauma cases resuscitation (n = 50) was done. Also, a sample size of 158 medical staff was covered for the questionnaire. The data was analyzed in Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) V.23.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of adherence to the ABCDE approach was 37.9 % (SD 15.44). When the ABCDE sequence was not followed, the ACB was the commonest sequence. Also, adherence had no significant relation with any patient or staff-related factor. The main present obstacles to adherence to the ABCDE approach were overcrowding in the room and unprepared facilities. While the major present facilitator was the clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

The adherence rate was low, but initiation of the ABCDE approach was rapid. The factors participating in low adherence rates were usually facility or population-based factors. We recommend further studies, further training and embedment of guidelines, and the provision of larger trauma rooms with adequate supplies.

State of the art of trauma teams in Italy: A nationwide study

Trauma teams play a vital role in providing prompt and specialized care to trauma patients. This study aims to provide a comprehensive description of the presence and organization of trauma teams in Italy. A nationwide cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted between July and October 2022, involving interviews with 137 designated trauma centers. Centers were stratified based on level: higher specialized trauma centers (CTS), intermediate level trauma centers (CTZ + N) and district general hospital with trauma capacity (CTZ). A standardized structured interview questionnaire was used to gather information on hospital characteristics, trauma team prevalence, activation pathways, structure, components, leadership, education, and governance. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results showed that 53 % of the centers had a formally defined trauma team, with higher percentages in CTS (73 %) compared to CTZ + N (49 %) and CTZ (39 %). The trauma team activation pathway varied among centers, with pre-alerts predominantly received from emergency medical services. The study also highlighted the lack of formally defined massive transfusion protocols in many centers. The composition of trauma teams typically included airway and procedure doctors, nurses, and healthcare assistants. Trauma team leadership was predetermined in 59 % of the centers, with anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians often assuming this role. The study revealed gaps in trauma team education and governance, with a lack of specific training for trauma team leaders and low utilization of simulation-based training. These findings emphasize the need for improvements in trauma management education, governance, and the formalization of trauma teams. This study provides valuable insights that can guide discussions and interventions aimed at enhancing trauma care at both local and national levels in Italy.

Survival benefits of interventional radiology and surgical teams collaboration during primary trauma surveys: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A team approach is essential for effective trauma management. Close collaboration between interventional radiologists and surgeons during the initial management of trauma patients is important for prompt and accurate trauma care. This study aimed to determine whether trauma patients benefit from close collaboration between interventional radiology (IR) and surgical teams during the primary trauma survey.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2021 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to an embolization group (EG), a surgery group (SG), or a combination group (CG) according to their treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival at hospital discharge compared with the probability of survival (Ps) and the time course of treatment.

RESULTS

The analysis included 197 patients, consisting of 135 men and 62 women, with a median age of 56 [IQR, 38-72] years and an injury severity score of 20 [10-29]. The EG, SG, and CG included 114, 48, and 35 patients, respectively. Differences in organ injury patterns were observed between the three groups. In-hospital survival rates in all three groups were higher than the Ps. In particular, the survival rate in the CG was 15.5% higher than the Ps (95% CI: 7.5-23.6%; p < 0.001). In the CG, the median time for starting the initial procedure was 53 [37-79] min and the procedure times for IR and surgery were 48 [29-72] min and 63 [35-94] min, respectively. Those times were significantly shorter among three groups.

CONCLUSION

Close collaboration between IR and surgical teams, including the primary survey, improves the survival of severe trauma patients who require both IR procedures and surgeries by improving appropriate treatment selection and reducing the time process.

The effect of a clock's presence on trauma resuscitation times in a Dutch level-1 trauma center: a pre-post cohort analysis

PURPOSE

Interventions performed within the first hour after trauma increase survival rates. Literature showed that measuring times can optimize the trauma resuscitation process as time awareness potentially reduces acute care time. This study examined the effect of a digital clock placement on trauma resuscitation times in an academic level-1 trauma center.

METHODS

A prospective observational pre-post cohort analysis was conducted for six months before and after implementing a visible clock in the trauma resuscitation room, indicating the time passed since starting the in-hospital resuscitation process. Trauma patients (age ≥ 16) presented during weekdays between 9.00 AM and 9.00 PM were included. Time until diagnostics (X-Ray, FAST, or CT scan), time until therapeutic intervention, and total resuscitation time were measured manually with a stopwatch by a researcher in the trauma resuscitation room. Patient characteristics and information regarding trauma- and injury type were collected. Times before and after clock implementation were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 100 patients were included, 50 patients in each cohort. The median total resuscitation time (including CT scan) was 40.3 min (IQR 23.3) in the cohort without a clock compared to 44.3 (IQR 26.1) minutes in the cohort with a clock. The mean time until the first diagnostic and until the CT scan was 8.3 min (SD 3.1) and 25.5 min (SD 7.1) without a clock compared to 8.6 min (SD 6.5) and 26.6 min (SD 11.5) with a clock. Severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16) showed a median resuscitation time in the cohort without a clock (n = 9) of 54.6 min (IQR 50.5) compared to 46.0 min (IQR 21.6) in the cohort with a clock (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

This study found no significant reduction in trauma resuscitation time after clock placement. Nonetheless, the data represent a heterogeneous population, not excluding specific patient categories for whom literature has shown that a short time is essential, such as severely injured patients, might benefit from the presence of a trauma clock. Future research is recommended into resuscitation times of specific patient categories and practices to investigate time awareness.

Design and psychometric properties of the acute care quality in trauma emergency units scale

BACKGROUND

Systematic trauma care scale could be designed and used by nurses to completely and adequately fulfill a complex care to improve trauma care quality. The purpose of this study was to design and evaluate the psychometric property of the Nursing Care Quality in Trauma Emergency Units and trauma care promotion.

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted in 2022. The process of designing and psychometric assessment of the scale was performed in two steps such as Generating an Item Pool and Validity and Reliability evaluation (Item reduction). The construct validity was determined using the experimental intervention; for determining the reliability of the scale and internal consistency, we measured the inter-rater reliability (IRR). Data were analyzed using the SPSS software, version 22.

RESULTS

Based on our findings, the CVI and CVR of the scale were 1 and 0.83-1, respectively. A significant difference between the pre- and post-intervention scores in group 1 supports the inference that the construct has been appropriately represented, and the instrument has construct validity (p < 0.001). We found that there was a significant difference in the scores of Patient assessment, Planning and Implementations, and Evaluation of the care plan. The inter-rater reliability method allows the optimal reliability assessment of observational instruments, which was used in this study, and the results confirmed excellent reliability of the instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity and reliability of the Nursing Care Quality in Trauma Emergency Units Scale were confirmed. The instrument could successfully assess the process of nursing care in the trauma emergency ward. The use of this checklist is recommended as a valid observational tool for other researchers.

STUDY TYPE

Therapeutic/care management.

Team communication patterns during real and simulated trauma resuscitation-a social network analysis

In trauma teams, coordination can be established through a centralised leader. The team can also use a decentralised strategy. In this descriptive study of video-recorded trauma resuscitations, using quantification of qualitative data, Social Network analysis of all real-time communications of eight in-real-life (IRL) and simulated trauma teams explained team social structure. The communication network structures in the simulated scenarios were more centralised using individually directed speech and had a high proportion of communication to update all team members. Such a structure might be the result of work performed in a complexity-stripped simulation environment where simplified task-executions required less interactions, or from work revolving around a deteriorating patient, imposing high demands on rapid decision-making and taskwork. Communication IRL was mostly decentralised, with more variability between cases, possibly due to unpredictability of the IRL case. The flexibility to act in a decentralised manner potentiates adaptability and seems beneficial in rapidly changing situations.Practitioner summary: Efficient collaboration in trauma teams is essential. Communication in in-real-life and simulated trauma teams was analysed using social network analysis. The simulation teams were overall more centralised compared to the IRL teams. The flexibility to act decentralised seems beneficial for emergency teams as it enables adaptability in unpredictable situations.

Outcome of severely injured patients in a unique trauma system with 24/7 double trauma surgeon on-call service

BACKGROUND

The presence of in-house attending trauma surgeons has improved efficiency of processes in the treatment of polytrauma patients. However, literature remains equivocal regarding the influence of the presence of in-house attendings on mortality. In our hospital there is a double trauma surgeon on-call system. In this system an in-house trauma surgeon is 24/7 backed up by a second trauma surgeon to assist with urgent surgery or multiple casualties. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome in severely injured patients in this unique trauma system.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2021, a prospective population-based cohort consisting of consecutive polytrauma patients aged ≥ 15 years requiring both urgent surgery (≤ 24h) and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was investigated. Demographics, treatment, outcome parameters and pre- and in-hospital transfer times were analyzed.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirteen patients with a median age of 44 years (71% male), and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 33 were included. Mortality rate was 19% (68% due to traumatic brain injury). All patients stayed ≤ 32 min in ED before transport to either CT or OR. Fifty-one percent of patients who needed damage control surgery (DCS) had a more deranged physiology, needed more blood products, were more quickly in OR with shorter time in OR, than patients with early definitive care (EDC). There was no difference in mortality rate between DCS and EDC patients. Fifty-six percent of patients had surgery during off-hours. There was no difference in outcome between patients who had surgery during daytime and during off-hours. Death could possibly have been prevented in 1 exsanguinating patient (1.7%).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of severely injured patients in need of urgent surgery and ICU support it was demonstrated that surgical decision making was swift and accurate with low preventable death rates. 24/7 Physical presence of a dedicated trauma team has likely contributed to these good outcomes.

The pelvic vascular injury score (P-VIS): a prehospital instrument to detect significant vascular injury in pelvic fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors for peri-pelvic vascular injury in patients with pelvic fractures and to incorporate these factors into a pelvic vascular injury score (P-VIS) to detect severe bleeding during the prehospital trauma management.

METHODS

To identify potential predictive factors, data were taken (1) of a Level I Trauma Centre with 467 patients (ISS ≥ 16 and AISPelvis ≥ 3). Analysis including patient's charts and digital recordings, radiographical diagnostics, mechanism and pattern of injury as well as the vascular bleeding source was performed. Statistical analysis was performed descriptively and through inference statistical calculation. To further analyse the predictive factors and finally develop the score, a 10-year time period (2012-2021) of (2) the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) was used in a second step. Relevant peri-pelvic bleeding in patients with AISPelvis ≥ 3 (N = 9227) was defined as a combination of the following entities (target group PVITR-DGU N = 2090; 22.7%): pelvic fracture with significant bleeding (> 20% of blood volume), Injury of the iliac or femoral artery or blood transfusion of ≥ 6 units (pRBC) prior to ICU admission. The multivariate analysis revealed nine items that constitute the pelvic vascular injury score (P-VIS).

RESULTS

In study (1), 467 blunt pelvic trauma patients were included of which 24 (PVI) were presented with significant vascular injury (PVI, N = 24; control (C, N = 443). Patients with pelvic fractures and vascular injury showed a higher ISS, lower haemoglobin at admission and lower blood pressure. Their mortality rate was higher (PVI: 17.4%, C: 10.3%). In the defining and validating process of the score within the TR-DGU, 9227 patients met the inclusion criteria. 2090 patients showed significant peripelvic vascular injury (PVITR-DGU), the remaining 7137 formed the control group (CTR-DGU). Nine predictive parameters for peripelvic vascular injury constituted the peripelvic vascular injury score (P-VIS): age ≥ 70 years, high-energy-trauma, penetrating trauma/open pelvic injury, shock index ≥ 1, cardio-pulmonary-resuscitation (CPR), substitution of > 1 l fluid, intubation, necessity of catecholamine substitution, remaining shock (≤ 90 mmHg) under therapy. The multi-dimensional scoring system leads to an ordinal scaled rating according to the probability of the presence of a vascular injury. A score of ≥ 3 points described the peripelvic vascular injury as probable, a result of ≥ 6 points identified a most likely vascular injury and a score of 9 points identified an apparent peripelvic vascular injury. Reapplying this score to the study population a median score of 5 points (range 3-8) (PVI) and a median score of 2 points (range 0-3) (C) (p < 0.001). The OR for peripelvic vascular injury was 24.3 for the patients who scored > 3 points vs. ≤ 2 points. The TR-DGU data set verified these findings (median of 2 points in CTR-DGU vs. median of 3 points with in PVITR-DGU).

CONCLUSION

The pelvic vascular injury score (P-VIS) allows an initial risk assessment for the presence of a vascular injury in patients with unstable pelvic injury. Thus, the management of these patients can be positively influenced at a very early stage, prehospital resuscitation performed safely targeted and further resources can be activated in the final treating Trauma Centre.

Implementation of a major trauma team. Analysis of activation and care times in patients admitted to the ICU

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the factors associated with the activation of the severe trauma care team (STAT) in patients admitted to the ICU, to measure its impact on care times, and to analyze the groups of patients according to activation and level of anatomical involvement.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of severe trauma admitted to the ICU. From June 2017 to May 2019. Risk factors for the activation of the STAT analysed with logistic regression and CART type classification tree.

SETTING

Second level hospital ICU.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted consecutively.

INTERVENTIONS

No.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

STAT activation. Demographic variables. Injury severity (ISS), intentionality, mechanism, assistance times, evolutionary complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were admitted (46.8% of STAT activation), median age of 52 (37-64) years (activated 47 (27-62) vs not activated 55 (42-67) P = 0.023), males 84.0%. No difference in mortality according to activation. The logistic model finds as factors: care (16.6 (2.1-13.2)) and prehospital intubation (4.2 (1.8-9.8)) and severe lower extremity injury (4.4 (1.6-12.3)). Accidental fall (0.2 (0.1-0.6)) makes activation less likely. The CART model selects the type of trauma mechanism and can separate high and low energy trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with STAT activation were prehospital care, requiring prior intubation, high-energy mechanisms, and severe lower extremity injuries. Shorter care times if activated without influencing mortality. We must improve activation in older patients with low-energy trauma and without prehospital care.

Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey

INTRODUCTION

Trauma teams (TTs) are a key tool in trauma care, as they bring a multidisciplinary approach to the trauma patient, improving outcomes. Excellent teamwork (TW) requires not only individual skills but also training at non-technical skills (NTS). Although there is evidence supporting TTs, there is little information regarding how they are organized and trained. With this study, we intend to assess the reality of TTs all over the world, focusing on how they are organized and trained.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We composed a 42-question sheet on Google Forms, in four different languages (English, Polish, Portuguese, and Spanish). The questions regarded the respondents' background, and their respective hospitals' trauma patient management, TT features and its training, NTS and TW. The survey was shared on social media, through the International Assessment Group of Online Surgical & Trauma Education community, and the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Statistical analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) version 27.

RESULTS

We obtained 296 answers from 52 different countries, with 6 having at least 10 answers (Brazil, Portugal, Poland, Spain, Italy, and USA). While the majority of the respondents (97%) agreed that TTs can improve outcomes, only 61% have a TT in their hospital, with 69% of these being dedicated TTs. General surgery (76%), trauma surgery (68%), and anesthesia (66%) were the three most common specialties in the teams. Teams performed briefings and debriefings with a frequency of, at least, "often" in only 49% and 38%, respectively. Only 50% and 33% of the respondents stated that their hospital provided trauma management courses focusing on individual technical skills, and TT training courses, respectively. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (85%), the Definitive Surgical and Anesthetic Trauma Care (38%), and the European Trauma Course (31%) were the three trauma management courses of choice. Regarding TT training courses, the European Trauma Course (52%) and local/in-house (42%) courses were the most common ones. Most participants (93%) stated that NTS were highly important in trauma care. However, only 60% of the respondents had postgraduate training on NTS and TW, and only 24% had this type of training on an undergraduate level.

CONCLUSION

The number of TTs worldwide does not match their relevance in trauma care. Institutions are not providing enough trauma courses, particularly TT training courses and NTS teaching. Implementing TT should include promotion of team courses, as well as team briefings and debriefings.

Do patient outcomes differ when the trauma team leader is a surgeon or non-surgeon? A multicentre cohort study

PURPOSE

Trauma team leaders (TTLs) have traditionally been general surgeons; however, some trauma centres use a mixed model of care where both surgeons and non-surgeons (primarily emergency physicians) perform this role. The objective of this multicentre study was to provide a well-powered study to determine if TTL specialty is associated with mortality among major trauma patients.

METHODS

Data were collected from provincial trauma registries at six level 1 trauma centres across Canada over a 10-year period. We included adult trauma patients (age ≥ 18 yrs) who triggered the highest-level trauma activation. The primary outcome was the difference in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality for trauma patients receiving initial care from a surgeon versus a non-surgeon TTL.

RESULTS

Overall, 12,961 major trauma patients were included in the analysis. Initial treatment was provided by a surgeon TTL in 57.8% (n = 7513) of cases, while 42.2% (n = 5448) of patients were treated by a non-surgeon TTL. Unadjusted mortality occurred in 11.6% of patients in the surgeon TTL group and 12.7% of patients in the non-surgeon TTL group (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = 0.02). Risk-adjusted mortality was not significantly different between patients cared for by surgeon and non-surgeon TTLs (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.06, p = 0.23). Furthermore, we did not observe differences in risk-adjusted mortality for any of the subgroups evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

After risk adjustment, there was no difference in mortality between trauma patients treated by surgeon or non-surgeon TTLs. Our study supports emergency physicians performing the role of TTL at level 1 trauma centres.

Is delayed fixation worthwhile in patients with long bone fracture concomitant with mild traumatic brain injury? A propensity score-matched study

INTRODUCTION

Early definite treatment for orthopedic patients is strongly advocated. However, a consensus has not been reached on the optimal timing of long bone fracture fixation for patients with associated mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Surgeons lack evidence on the basis on which they should decide on the operation timing.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with mild TBI and lower extremity long bone fractures from 2010 to 2020. The patients receiving internal fixation within and after 24 h were defined as the early- and delayed-fixation groups. We compared the discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, lengths of stay, and in-hospital complications. Propensity score matching (PSM) with multiple adjusted variables and a 1:1 matching ratio was applied to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

In total, 181 patients were enrolled; 78 (43.1%) and 103 (56.9%) patients received early and delayed fracture fixation, respectively. After matching, each group had 61 participants and were statistically identical. The delayed group did not have better discharge GCS scores (early vs. delayed: 15.0 ± 0 vs. 15.0 ± 0.1; p = 0.158). The groups did not differ in their lengths of hospital stay (15.3 ± 10.6 vs. 14.8 ± 7.9; p = 0.789), intensive care unit stay (2.7 ± 4.3 vs. 2.7 ± 3.8; p = 0.947), or incidence of complications (23.0% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.494).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed fixation for patients with lower extremity long bone fractures concurrent with mild TBI does not result in fewer complications or improved neurologic outcomes compared with early fixation. Delaying fixation may not be necessary to prevent the second hit phenomenon and has not demonstrated any clear benefits.

Impact of trauma teams on high grade liver injury care: a two-decade propensity score approach study in Taiwan

High-grade liver laceration is a common injury with bleeding as the main cause of death. Timely resuscitation and hemostasis are keys to the successful management. The impact of in-hospital trauma system on the quality of resuscitation and management in patients with traumatic high-grade liver laceration, however, was rarely reported. We retrospectively reviewed the impact of team-based approach on the quality and outcomes of high-grade traumatic liver laceration in our hospital. Patients with traumatic liver laceration between 2002 and 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted analysis using the propensity score were performed. Outcomes before the trauma team establishment (PTTE) and after the trauma team establishment (TTE) were compared. A total of 270 patients with liver trauma were included. After IPTW adjustment, interval between emergency department arrival and managements was shortened in the TTE group with a median of 11 min (p < 0.001) and 28 min (p < 0.001) in blood test reports and duration to CT scan, respectively. Duration to hemostatic treatments in the TTE group was also shorter by a median of 94 min in patients receiving embolization (p = 0.012) and 50 min in those undergoing surgery (p = 0.021). The TTE group had longer ICU-free days to day 28 (0.0 vs. 19.0 days, p = 0.010). In our study, trauma team approach had a survival benefit for traumatic high-grade liver injury patients with 65% reduction of risk of death within 72 h (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.14-0.86) and 55% reduction of risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87). A team-based approach might contribute to the survival benefit in patients with traumatic high-grade liver laceration by facilitating patient transfer from outside the hospital, through the diagnostic examination, and to the definitive hemostatic procedures.

Simulation in cardiac critical care

Medical simulation is a broad topic but at its core is defined as any effort to realistically reproduce a clinical procedure, team, or situation. Its goal is to allow risk-free practice-until-perfect, and in doing so, augment performance, efficiency, and safety. In medicine, even complex clinical situations can be dissected into reproducible parts that may be repeated and mastered, and these iterative improvements can add up to major gains. With our modern cardiac intensive care units treating a growing number of medically complex patients, the need for well-trained personnel, streamlined care pathways, and quality teamwork is imperative for improved patient outcomes. Simulation is therefore a potentially life-saving tool relevant to anyone working in cardiac intensive care. Accordingly, we believe that simulation is a priority for cardiac intensive care, not just a luxury. We offer the following primer on simulation in the cardiac intensive care environment.

Development of trauma team cognition can be explained by "split vision": A grounded theory study

The aim of this study was to explore interaction of interprofessional hospital trauma teams. A theory about how team cognition is developed through a dynamical process was established using grounded theory methodology. Video recordings of in-real-life resuscitations performed in the emergency ward of a Scandinavian mid-size urban hospital were collected and eligible for inclusion using theoretical sampling. By analyzing interactions during seven trauma resuscitations, the theory that trauma teams perform patient assessment and resuscitation by alternating between two process modes, the two main categories "team positioning" and "sensitivity to the patient," was generated. The core category "working with split vision" explicates how the teams interplay between the two modes to coordinate team focus with an emergent mental model of the specific situation. Split vision ensures that deeper aspects of the team, such as culture, knowledge, empathy, and patient needs are absorbed to continuously adapt team positioning and create precision in care for the specific patient.

Assessment of Trauma Team Activation Fees by US Region and Hospital Ownership

IMPORTANCE

Trauma centers must be readily equipped to handle a variety of life-threatening injuries and consequently may charge a fee for the activation of their trauma team. Regional and hospital-related variations in trauma activation fees across the US have not been formally assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the variability of trauma activation fees from trauma centers across the US and examine whether certain hospital characteristics are associated with higher activation fees.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study used data from the American College of Surgeons website to identify all trauma centers in the US that were listed as verified from inception of the verification database through March 4, 2022 (N = 546). Five military hospitals were excluded, and trauma activation fees could not be found for 18 trauma centers; the remaining 523 hospitals were included in the analysis. Each hospital's publicly available chargemaster (a comprehensive list of a hospital's products, procedures, and services) was searched to obtain its trauma activation fees. Two levels of trauma activation fees were recorded: tier 1 (full activation) and tier 2 (partial activation). Hospital-specific data were obtained from the American Hospital Association website. All data were collected between January 2 and March 11, 2022. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess potential associations between hospital characteristics (type of control [for profit, government, church, or other nonprofit], hospital system [owner], number of staffed beds, and academic vs nonacademic status) and trauma activation fees.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Median and mean trauma activation fees nationally and stratified by location, hospital system, and other hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 523 trauma centers included in the analysis, most were located in the Midwest (180 centers) and West (129 centers). There were 176 adult level I trauma centers and 200 adult level II trauma centers; 69 centers had for-profit status, and 415 were academic. Overall, the median (IQR) tier 1 trauma activation fee was $9500 ($5601-$17 805), and the mean (SD) tier 1 trauma activation fee was $13 349 ($11 034); these fees ranged from $1000 to $61 734. Median (IQR) trauma activation fees were highest in the West ($18 099 [$10 741-$$27 607]), especially in California, where the median (IQR) activation fee was $24 057 ($15 979-$33 618). Trauma activation fees were also higher at for-profit hospitals, most of which were owned by the HCA Healthcare system, which had 43 trauma centers and a median (IQR) tier 1 trauma activation fee of $29 999 ($20 196-$37 589).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, trauma activation fees varied widely among hospitals in the US. Regional variation in these fees was substantial, with hospitals in the West charging substantially more than those in other locations. In addition, for-profit hospitals charged more than other types of hospitals. These findings suggest that some patients with serious traumatic injuries will incur disproportionately high trauma activation fees depending on the trauma center to which they are brought. Therefore, standardization of trauma activation fees is warranted.

The effect of an on-site trauma surgeon during resuscitations of severely injured patients

BACKGROUND

Although the timely involvement of trauma surgeons is widely accepted as standard care in a trauma center, there is an ongoing debate regarding the value of an on-site attending trauma surgeon compared to an on-call trauma surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing an on-site trauma surgeons and the effect of their presence on the adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) related tasks and resuscitation pace in the trauma bay.

METHODS

The resuscitations of severely injured (ISS > 15) trauma patients 1 month before and 1 month after the introduction of an on-site trauma surgeon were assessed using video analysis. The primary outcome was total resuscitation time. Second, time from trauma bay admission until tasks were performed, and ATLS adherence were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight videos of resuscitations have been analyzed. After the introduction of an on-site trauma surgeon, the mean total resuscitation time was 259 seconds shorter (p = 0.03) and seven ATLS related tasks (breathing assessment, first and second IV access, EKG monitoring and abdominal, pelvic, and long bone examination; were performed significantly earlier during trauma resuscitation (p ≤ 0.05). Further, we found a significant enhancement to the adherence of six ATLS related tasks (Airway assessment, application of a rigid collar, IV access; EKG monitoring, log roll, and pronouncing results of arterial blood gas analysis; p-value ≤0.05).

CONCLUSION

Having a trauma surgeon on-site during trauma resuscitations of severely injured patients resulted in improved processes in the trauma bay. This demonstrates the need of direct involvement of trauma surgeons in institutions treating severely injured patients.

Variation of in-hospital trauma team staffing: new resuscitation, new team

Background

Non-technical errors, such as insufficient communication or leadership, are a major cause of medical failures during trauma resuscitation. Research on staffing variation among trauma teams on teamwork is still in their infancy. In this study, the extent of variation in trauma team staffing was assessed. Our hypothesis was that there would be a high variation in trauma team staffing.

Methods

Trauma team composition of consecutive resuscitations of injured patients were evaluated using videos. All trauma team members that where part of a trauma team during a trauma resuscitation were identified and classified during a one-week period. Other outcomes were number of unique team members, number of new team members following the previous resuscitation and new team members following the previous resuscitation in the same shift (Day, Evening, Night).

Results

All thirty-two analyzed resuscitations had a unique trauma team composition and 101 unique members were involved. A mean of 5.71 (SD 2.57) new members in teams of consecutive trauma resuscitations was found, which was two-third of the trauma team. Mean team members present during trauma resuscitation was 8.38 (SD 1.43). Most variation in staffing was among nurses (32 unique members), radiology technicians (22 unique members) and anesthetists (19 unique members). The least variation was among trauma surgeons (3 unique members) and ER physicians (3 unique members).

Conclusion

We found an extremely high variation in trauma team staffing during thirty-two consecutive resuscitations at our level one trauma center which is incorporated in an academic teaching hospital. Further research is required to explore and prevent potential negative effects of staffing variation in trauma teams on teamwork, processes and patient related outcomes.

“Unchaining the doctor from the desk”: deliberate team-based care in action

Purpose

As a model of integrated care (IC), deliberate team-based care (DTBC) can help address workforce shortages facing rural communities by improving the health and wellbeing of healthcare providers. This study focuses on a GP practice implementing DTBC in rural Australia. The aim of this research was to understand the perspectives of the healthcare workers involved and to ascertain factors impacting on the day to day running of the model, patient care and clinician work-life. The authors conducted a qualitative study on the experiences of the DTBC workers.

Design/methodology/approach

Team members were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews (n = 9). Interviews were analysed using an iterative thematic analysis, summarised, collated and explored for emergent themes.

Findings

Key themes included: creating change from old ways of doing things, development and implementation processes outlining how the model evolved and how it ran from day to day, model outcomes for patients and clinicians, as well as practical considerations like funding, technology and time.

Originality/value

Building DTBC from the ground up has produced a high functioning team who demonstrate trust and equality, share information freely and all have a voice which is heard and respected. By acting as a champion and a leader, the GP has created a psychologically safe environment allowing the team to share knowledge, collaborate in problem solving and provide effective patient care which is holistic and community grounded. This work environment holds promise for creating improved work-life for rural clinicians and potential for workforce retention.

Evaluation of validity and reliability of video analysis and live observations to assess trauma team performance

INTRODUCTION

A trauma resuscitation is dynamic and complex process in which failures could lead to serious adverse events. In several trauma centers, evaluation of trauma resuscitation is part of a hospital's quality assessment program. While video analysis is commonly used, some hospitals use live observations, mainly due to ethical and medicolegal concerns. The aim of this study was to compare the validity and reliability of video analysis and live observations to evaluate trauma resuscitations.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, validity was assessed by comparing the observed adherence to 28 advanced trauma life support (ATLS) guideline related tasks by video analysis to life observations. Interobserver reliability was assessed by calculating the intra class coefficient of observed ATLS related tasks by live observations and video analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven simulated and thirteen real-life resuscitations were assessed. Overall, the percentage of observed ATLS related tasks performed during simulated resuscitations was 10.4% (P < 0.001) higher when the same resuscitations were analysed using video compared to live observations. During real-life resuscitations, 8.7% (p < 0.001) more ATLS related tasks were observed using video review compared to live observations. In absolute terms, a mean of 2.9 (during simulated resuscitations) respectively 2.5 (during actual resuscitations) ATLS-related tasks per resuscitation were not identified using live observers, that were observed through video analysis. The interobserver variability for observed ATLS related tasks was significantly higher using video analysis compared to live observations for both simulated (video analysis: ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.97-0.98 vs. live observation: ICC 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.78) and real-life witnessed resuscitations (video analyse 0.99; 95% CI 0.99-1.00 vs live observers 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.89).

CONCLUSION

Video analysis of trauma resuscitations may be more valid and reliable compared to evaluation by live observers. These outcomes may guide the debate to justify video review instead of live observations.

What trauma patients need: the European dilemma

There is a need for implementation and maturation of an inclusive trauma system in every country in Europe, with patient centered care by dedicated surgeons. This process should be initiated by physicians and medical societies, based on the best available evidence, and supported and subsequently funded by the government and healthcare authorities. A systematic approach to organizing all aspects of trauma will result in health gain in terms of quality of care provided, higher survival rates, better functional outcomes and quality of life. In addition, it will provide reliable data for both research, quality improvement and prevention programs. Severely injured patients need surgeons with broad technical and non-technical competencies to provide holistic, inclusive and compassionate care. Here we describe the philosophy of the surgical approach and define the necessary skills for trauma, both surgical and other, to improve outcome of severely injured patients. As surgery is an essential part of trauma care, surgeons play an important role for the optimal treatment of trauma patients throughout and after their hospital stay, including the intensive care unit (ICU). However, in most European countries, it might not be obvious to either the general public, patients or even the physicians that the surgeon must assume this responsibility in the ICU to optimize outcomes. The aim of this paper is to define key elements in terms of trauma systems, trauma-specific surgical skills and active critical care involvement, to organize and optimize trauma care in Europe.

Trauma Resuscitation Training: An Evaluation of Nurses' Knowledge

BACKGROUND

Trauma resuscitation in the emergency department involves coordinated, well-equipped, and trained health care providers to make essential, prudent, and expedient management decisions. During resuscitation, health care providers' knowledge and skills are critical in minimizing the potential risks of mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of training on nurses' knowledge and confidence regarding trauma resuscitation and whether there was any difference between participants with and without previous trauma training.

METHODS

This study used a pre- and posttraining test study design to evaluate the effects of an intensive 8-hr trauma resuscitation training program on nurses' knowledge from January 2018 to August 2021. The training program consisted of lectures and patient scenarios covering initial assessment, resuscitation, and management priorities for trauma patients in life-threatening situations, stressing the principles of the trauma team approach.

RESULTS

A total of 128 nurses participated in 16 courses conducted during the study period. This study found significant improvement in nurses' knowledge after the training (pre- and posttraining median [interquartile range, IQR] test scores 5 [4-6] vs. 9 [8-9], p < .001). There was no significant difference in pretraining test scores between the participants with previous trauma training and those without training (median [IQR] test scores 5 [4-6] vs. 4 [4-5], p = .751).

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma resuscitation training affects nurses' knowledge improvement, emphasizing the need for training trauma care professionals to provide adequate care.

The quality of pre-announcement communication and the accuracy of estimated arrival time in critically ill patients, a prospective observational study

Background

Efficient communication between (helicopter) emergency medical services ((H)EMS) and healthcare professionals in the emergency department (ED) is essential to facilitate appropriate team mobilization and preparation for critically ill patients. A correct estimated time of arrival (ETA) is crucial for patient safety and time-management since all team members have to be present, but needless waiting must be avoided. The aim of this study is to investigate the quality of the pre-announcement and the accuracy of the ETA.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in potentially critically ill/injured patients transported to the ED of a Level I trauma center by the (H)EMS. Research assistants observed time slots prior to arrival at the ED and during the initial assessment, using a stopwatch and an observation form. Information on the pre-announcement (including mechanisms of injury, vital signs, and the ETA) is also collected.

Results

One hundred and ninety-three critically ill/injured patients were included. Information in the pre-announcement was often incomplete; in particular vital signs (86%). Forty percent of the announced critically ill patients were non-critical at arrival in the ED. The observed time of arrival (OTA) for 66% of the patients was later than the provided ETA (median 5:15 min) and 19% of the patients arrived sooner (3:10 min). Team completeness prior to the arrival of the patient was achieved for 66% of the patients.

Conclusions

The quality of the pre-announcement is moderate, sometimes lacking essential information on vital signs. Forty percent of the critically ill patients turned out to be non-critical at the ED. Furthermore, the ETA was regularly inaccurate and team completeness was insufficient. However, none of the above was correlated to the rate of complications, mortality, LOS, ward of admission or discharge location.

A systematic review of penetrating perineal trauma in a civilian setting

PURPOSE

Penetrating injuries to the perineum and associated pelvic organs have largely been reported in the military. Given the rarity of presentation and unique clinical characteristics of these injuries, we set out to address the gap in the literature in civilian settings.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies addressing penetrating perineal trauma from January 2000 to April 2021 was performed. Outcomes of interest were the epidemiology, associated injuries, management, follow-up, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

26 studies were included in this review, reporting on a total of 2316 patients. Most injuries occurred in males (88.1%), with gunshot wounds (88.2%) representing the most common aetiology, followed by knife wounds (5.0%), impalement (3.1%), coital injuries/sexual assault (1.5%), and others (2.4%). Regarding associated injuries, anorectal (n = 1419, 69.4%), bladder (n = 351, 32.4%), penile (n = 282, 20.8%), scrotal (n = 375, 27.7%), and testicular (n = 229, 16.9%) occurred frequently. Bony injuries involved the pelvis (n = 88, 8.1%) and femoral fractures (n = 5, 0.5%), while soft-tissue injuries involved the inguinal region (n = 19, 1.6%) and buttocks (n = 14, 1.3%). Vascular injuries occurred in 79 (7.8%) patients. Regarding patient outcomes, 65 (4.8%) deaths were reported, and significant morbidity was detected with a mean injury severity score of 18.4 detected in the cohort. In terms of complications of injury, wound/infective complications (n = 135, 61.3%) and fistula formation/leakage (n = 16, 0.7%) featured prominently.

CONCLUSION

Penetrating perineal trauma in the civilian population poses a considerable challenge to clinicians, compounded by the potential for multisystem injury requiring involvement of different medical and surgical specialties.

Family support role in hospital rapid response teams: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to identify and understand the primary research investigating the family support role in hospital rapid response teams.

INTRODUCTION

Individual studies have described the benefits of providing emotional and psychosocial support to family members of a person receiving emergency medical care from a rapid response team in a hospital setting. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies that have identified and described these studies together.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All empirical qualitative and quantitative papers investigating a family support role delivered in a rapid response team in a hospital setting were included.

METHODS

This review followed a published a priori protocol. The four databases searched were MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, and OpenGrey. The search strategy was not limited by the age of participants within studies or by the language the study was published in. The title and abstracts of all citations were reviewed by two authors independently, and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion. The full text of the remaining studies were retrieved and reviewed by two authors independently. Data from eligible studies were extracted by two authors separately using a predetermined data extraction form and summarized in table and narrative format.

RESULTS

After a full-text review of 110 studies, six studies met all inclusion criteria. All rapid response teams were set in hospital locations, and the studies were set in four nations. Charted data demonstrates that the family support role had been investigated predominantly by qualitative study designs from the perspective of staff delivering the role. One study reported health outcomes of family members who received family support. In all studies, the family support role was part of a resuscitation rapid response team. Family support was provided at all stages of the resuscitation procedure. The family support role was not a consistently defined role, with the activities of the family support person reported differently between studies. Twenty-five varying support activities were described, such as attending to the family members' comfort needs, explaining the process of resuscitation, and providing guidance to the family member. In all studies, the family support role was available to support the family witnessing the resuscitation. The family support role was delivered by professionals from varying disciplines, including social work, nursing, health care workers, and health care chaplains.

CONCLUSIONS

Family support roles are varied and are carried out by health professionals of various backgrounds highlighting the need to consider the support and training needs of the person performing the role. Future research using evaluation methods is recommended to deepen the understanding about the family support role in hospital-based rapid response teams.

The pace of a trauma resuscitation: experience matters

Purpose

Resuscitation quality and pace depend on effective team coordination, which can be facilitated by adequate leadership. Our primary aim was to assess the influence of trauma team leader experience on resuscitation pace. Second, we investigated the influence of injury severity on resuscitation pace.

Methods

The trauma team leaders were identified (Staff trauma surgeon vs Fellow trauma surgeon) and classified from video analysis during a 1-week period. Resuscitations were assessed for time to the treatment plan, total resuscitation time, and procedure time. Furthermore, patient and resuscitation characteristics were assessed and compared: age, gender, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale < 9, and the number (and duration) of surgical procedures during initial resuscitation. Correlations between total resuscitation time, Injury Severity Score, and time to treatment plan were calculated.

Results

After adjustment for the time needed for procedures, the time to treatment plan and total resuscitation time was significantly shorter in resuscitations led by a Staff trauma surgeon compared to a Fellow trauma surgeon (median 648 s (IQR 472–813) vs 852 s (IQR 694–1256); p 0.01 resp. median 1280 s (IQR 979–1494) vs 1535 s (IQR 1247–1864), p 0.04). Surgical procedures were only performed during resuscitations led by Staff trauma surgeons (4 thorax drains, 1 endotracheal intubation, 1 closed fracture reduction). Moreover, a significant negative correlation (r:  – 0.698, p < 0.01) between Injury Severity Score and resuscitation time was found.

Conclusion

Experienced trauma team leaders may positively influence the pace of the resuscitation. Moreover, we found that the resuscitation pace increases when the patient is more severely injured.

Trauma Bay Time Clocks: Influence on Emergency Department Length of Stay

BACKGROUND

To monitor the time elapsed since patient arrival in the emergency department, Trauma Services at the study institution installed a large digital stopwatch timer placed at the head of each trauma bay on June 5, 2017. This quality improvement endeavor became an essential component of performance evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to measure the impact of trauma bay time clocks on emergency department length of stay.

METHODS

This is a retrospective before-and-after study of trauma activation patients between June 2015 and May 2019. Two 24-month intervals were compared before and after installation of time clocks.

RESULTS

In full activation patients, outcomes of emergency department length of stay ≤50 min (39.2% vs. 61.7%, p < .001) and time to transfer to intensive care unit ≤56 min (45.3% vs. 55.1%, p = .002) were significantly favorable in the postimplementation phase. Time to first computed tomography scan and time to first operating room from arrival to the emergency department were comparable between both phases. For limited activation patients, positive changes were noted in emergency department length of stay ≤87 min (41.4% vs. 60.6%, p < .001), time to first computed tomography scan ≤32 min (47.7% vs. 53.0%, p = .015), and time to transfer to intensive care unit ≤74 min (50.2% vs. 57.2%, p = .008). Time to first operating room remained comparable between two periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The study institution improved their provision of immediate care by using time clocks in trauma bays. This is a simple and cost-effective intervention and may benefit similar institutions.

The family support role in hospital rapid response teams: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to identify and understand how a family support role has been delivered in rapid response teams in hospital settings.

INTRODUCTION

A family support role in a hospital rapid response team is a designated position that is responsible for supporting the family members of people being medically attended to during a hospital rapid response. Support may include the provision of guidance to the family regarding a hospital procedure, support whilst witnessing the rapid response, or assisting the family to process their emotional response. This review will assist in identifying the ways in which the family support role is delivered in rapid response teams within a hospital environment.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Family support must be delivered by a person who has a designated family support role within a rapid response team in a hospital setting. Studies will not be limited to geographical location, gender, or culture. Studies are not limited to year of publication or methodological design.

METHODS

Databases will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, and Cochrane. Gray literature will be searched with predetermined search criteria. Two independent authors will be used to screen articles and perform data extraction on a predetermined data extraction form. A narrative Summary of Findings is planned, alongside a presentation of the data in diagrammatic or tabular form.

Präklinische Bluttransfusion bei lebensbedrohlicher Blutung – erweiterte lebensrettende Therapieoptionen durch das Konzept Medical Intervention Car

Das Medical Intervention Car (MIC) der Klinik für Anästhesiologie des Universitätsklinikums Heidelberg (UKHD) stellt ein neuartiges experimentelles Versorgungskonzept dar, welches zusätzliche Expertise und bisher nur innerklinisch etablierte Interventionen in der Präklinik verfügbar macht. Hierzu zählen die Transfusion von Blutprodukten, die Notfallthorakotomie, die „resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta“ (REBOA) sowie die Möglichkeit zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR). Anhand der Fallvorstellung eines jungen Patienten, der sich mit einer Kettensäge in der Leiste verletzte und einen hämorrhagisch bedingten Kreislaufstillstand erlitt, wird insbesondere die Möglichkeit der lebensrettenden Transfusion diskutiert. In diesem Einsatz führte ein integratives präklinisches Versorgungskonzept, bestehend aus Rettungswagen, Notarzteinsatzfahrzeug und MIC, zur Wiederherstellung des Spontankreislaufs und einer vollständigen zerebralen Erholung des Patienten.

Process related decisions and in-hospital transport times in polytrauma patients benefit from 24/7 in-house presence of trauma surgeons

BACKGROUND

Time and cause of death in polytrauma has shifted due to improvements in trauma and critical care. These include logistical improvements with dedicated trauma teams and in-house trauma surgeons. This study investigated in-hospital transport times and influence of process related decisions on mortality in polytrauma patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A 6.5-year prospective study included consecutive polytrauma patients ≥15 years admitted to a Level-1 Trauma Center ICU with 24/7 in-house trauma surgeons. Demographics, physiologic parameters, pre- and in-hospital transport times were prospectively collected. Data are presented as median(IQR).

RESULTS

391 patients were included with median ISS of 29(22-36). 82 patients(21%) had a SBP≤90 mmHg on arrival in ED. 44 patients went from ED directly to OR for urgent surgery, all others had CT prior to OR and/or ICU. Patients who went directly to OR from ED had median transport time of 28(23-37) min. Patients who had CT after ED had median transport time of 31(25-42) min. 74(19%) patients died, majority caused by TBI(70%). Ten patients died <24 h after trauma (4 hemorrhage,3 TBI,2 ischemia,1 cardiac injury), 9 of them went straight to OR from ED. Death could possibly have been prevented in 1 patient (1%) who later died of hemorrhage but went to CT before urgent surgery.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital transport times from ED were half an hour regardless of the following destination (OR/CT). Decisions for transport order based on clinical signs in primary survey were rapid and accurate. This could be attributed to dedicated trauma teams and 24/7 physical presence of trauma surgeons.

Simulation-based team training in time-critical clinical presentations in emergency medicine and critical care: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The use of simulation-based team training has increased over the past decades. Simulation-based team training within emergency medicine and critical care contexts is best known for its use by trauma teams and teams involved in cardiac arrest. In the domain of emergency medicine, simulation-based team training is also used for other typical time-critical clinical presentations. We aimed to review the existing literature and current state of evidence pertaining to non-technical skills obtained via simulation-based team training in emergency medicine and critical care contexts, excluding trauma and cardiac arrest contexts.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Before the initiation of the study, the protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. We conducted a systematic literature search of 10 years of publications, up to December 17, 2019, in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Two authors independently reviewed all the studies and extracted data.

RESULTS

Of the 456 studies screened, 29 trials were subjected to full-text review, and 13 studies were included in the final review. None of the studies was randomized controlled trials, and no studies compared simulation training to different modalities of training. Studies were heterogeneous; they applied simulation-training concepts of different durations and intensities and used different outcome measures for non-technical skills. Two studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3. Out of the remaining 11 studies, nine reached Kirkpatrick level 2, and two reached Kirkpatrick level 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature on simulation-based team training in emergency medicine is heterogeneous and sparse, but somewhat supports the hypothesis that simulation-based team training is beneficial to teams' knowledge and attitudes toward non-technical skills (Kirkpatrick level 2). Randomized trials are called for to clarify the effect of simulation compared to other modalities of team training. Future research should focus on the transfer of skills and investigate improvements in patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4).

Collaboration and Decision-Making on Trauma Teams: A Survey Assessment

Introduction

Leadership, communication, and collaboration are important in well-managed trauma resuscitations. We surveyed resuscitation team members (attendings, fellows, residents, and nurses) in a large urban trauma center regarding their impressions of collaboration among team members and their satisfaction with patient care decisions.

Methods

The Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions in Trauma (CSACD.T) survey was administered to members of ad hoc trauma teams immediately after resuscitations. Survey respondents self-reported their demographic characteristics; the CSACD.T scores were then compared by gender, occupation, self-identified leader role, and level of training.

Results

The study population consisted of 281 respondents from 52 teams; 111 (39.5%) were female, 207 (73.7%) were self-reported White, 78 (27.8%) were nurses, and 140 (49.8%) were physicians. Of the 140 physician respondents, 38 (27.1%) were female, representing 13.5% of the total surveyed population. Nine of the 52 teams had a female leader. Men, physicians (vs nurses), fellows (vs attendings), and self-identified leaders trended toward higher satisfaction across all questions of the CSACD.T. In addition to the comparison groups mentioned, women and general team members (vs non-leaders) gave lower scores.

Conclusion

Female residents, nurses, general team members, and attendings gave lower CSACD.T scores in this study. Identification of nuances and underlying causes of lower scores from female members of trauma teams is an important next step. Gender-specific training may be necessary to change negative team dynamics in ad hoc trauma teams.

Equipos de trauma: realidad mundial e implementación en un país en desarrollo. Descripción narrativa

Introducción. El trauma es una de las entidades con mayor morbimortalidad en el mundo. Los equipos especializados en la atención del paciente traumatizado son llamados <<equipos de trauma>>. Dichos equipos surgieron de la necesidad de brindar tratamiento oportuno multidisciplinario a individuos con heridas que condicionan gran severidad en la guerra; sin embargo, con el paso del tiempo se trasladaron al ámbito civil, generando un impacto positivo en términos de tiempos de atención, mortalidad y morbilidad. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el proceso de desarrollo de los equipos de trauma a nivel mundial y la experiencia en nuestra institución en el suroccidente colombiano. Métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda en la base de datos PUBMED, que incluyó revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, revisiones de Cochrane, ensayos clínicos y series de casos. Resultados. Se incluyeron 41 estudios para esta revisión narrativa, y se observó que el tiempo de permanencia en el Emergencias, el tiempo de traslado a cirugía, la mortalidad y las complicaciones asociadas al trauma fueron menores cuando se implementan equipos de trauma. Discusión. El diseño de un sistema de atención y valoración horizontal de un paciente con traumatismos severos produce un impacto positivo en términos de tiempos de atención, mortalidad y morbilidad. Se hace necesario establecer los parámetros operativos necesarios en las instituciones de salud de alta y mediana complejidad en nuestro país para implementar dichos equipos de trabajo.

The London Major Trauma Network System: A Literature Review

Trauma is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide and is a major global public health problem. The provision of trauma care has been substandard in England and Wales prior to the implementation of an inclusive major trauma network system in London in 2010 and subsequently across the rest of England two years later. The implementation of the London trauma system has brought about improvements to the delivery of trauma care by decreasing the overall morbidity and mortality significantly. This framework encompasses the collaboration of emergency services, designated Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), Trauma Units (TUs) and community providers which have been optimized with the expertise and resources to provide the best outcomes for major trauma patients. Specific triage protocols, consultant-led trauma service and on-the-spot access to radiology services and operating theatres have played a pivotal role in the improvement of trauma care. In spite of several strengths, however, the London major trauma network system is by no means without its limitations. The emergence of the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created major barriers to the smooth running of trauma services by exhausting resources due to infection control measures, reduced theatre space and re-deployment of medical staffs. In addition, the cancellation of elective surgeries has impacted directly on the training of surgical trainees by leaving them with significantly reduced surgical exposure. As a results of this ever changing surgical landscape, a need to urgently review these traditional surgical training methods with a view to modernize the curriculum. Although the London trauma system has evolved significantly since its implementation, its limitations should be recognized and addressed to enhance performance and improve patient outcomes. 

Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care

Background

Trauma care represents a complex patient journey, requiring multidisciplinary coordinated care. Team members are human, and as such, how they feel about their colleagues and their work affects performance. The challenge for health service leaders is enabling culture that supports high levels of collaboration, co-operation and coordination across diverse groups. We aimed to define and improve relational aspects of trauma care at Gold Coast University Hospital.

Methods

We conducted a mixed-methods collaborative ethnography using the relational coordination survey—an established tool to analyse the relational dimensions of multidisciplinary teamwork—participant observation, interviews and narrative surveys. Findings were presented to clinicians in working groups for further interpretation and to facilitate co-creation of targeted interventions designed to improve team relationships and performance.

Findings

We engaged a complex multidisciplinary network of ~500 care providers dispersed across seven core interdependent clinical disciplines. Initial findings highlighted the importance of relationships in trauma care and opportunities to improve. Narrative survey and ethnographic findings further highlighted the centrality of a translational simulation programme in contributing positively to team culture and relational ties. A range of 16 interventions—focusing on structural, process and relational dimensions—were co-created with participants and are now being implemented and evaluated by various trauma care providers.

Conclusions

Through engagement of clinicians spanning organisational boundaries, relational aspects of care can be measured and directly targeted in a collaborative quality improvement process. We encourage healthcare leaders to consider relationship-based quality improvement strategies, including translational simulation and relational coordination processes, in their efforts to improve care for patients with complex, interdependent journeys.

Reliability of the assessment of non-technical skills by using video-recorded trauma resuscitations

Purpose

Non-technical skills have gained attention, since enhancement of these skills is presumed to improve the process of trauma resuscitation. However, the reliability of assessing non-technical skills is underexposed, especially when using video analysis. Therefore, our primary aim was to assess the reliability of the Trauma Non-Technical Skills (T-NOTECHS) tool by video analysis. Secondarily, we investigated to what extent reliability increased when the T-NOTECHS was assessed by three assessors [average intra-class correlation (ICC)] instead of one (individual ICC).

Methods

As calculated by a pre-study power analysis, 18 videos were reviewed by three research assistants using the T-NOTECHS tool. Average and individual degree of agreement of the assessors was calculated using a two-way mixed model ICC.

Results

Average ICC was ‘excellent’ for the overall score and all five domains. Individual ICC was classified as ‘excellent’ for the overall score. Of the five domains, only one was classified as ‘excellent’, two as ‘good’ and two were even only ‘fair’.

Conclusions

Assessment of non-technical skills using the T-NOTECHS is reliable using video analysis and has an excellent reliability for the overall T-NOTECHS score. Assessment by three raters further improve the reliability, resulting in an excellent reliability for all individual domains.

An observational study of self-monitoring in ad hoc health care teams

BACKGROUND

Working in ad hoc teams in a health care environment is frequent but a challenging and complex undertaking. One way for teams to refine their teamwork could be through post-resuscitation reflection and debriefing. However, this would require that teams have insight into the quality of their teamwork. This study investigates (1) the accuracy of the self-monitoring of ad hoc resuscitation teams and their leaders relative to external observations of their teamwork and (2) the relationship of team self-monitoring and external observations to objective performance measures.

METHODS

We conducted a quantitative observational study of real-world ad hoc interprofessional teams responding to a simulated cardiac arrest in an emergency room. Teams consisting of residents, consultants, and nurses were confronted with an unexpected, simulated, standardized cardiac arrest situation. Their teamwork was videotaped to allow for subsequent external evaluation on the team emergency assessment measure (TEAM) checklist. In addition, objective performance measures such as time to defibrillation were collected. All participants completed a demographic questionnaire prior to the simulation and a questionnaire tapping their perceptions of teamwork directly after it.

RESULTS

22 teams consisting of 115 health care professionals showed highly variable performance. All performance measures intercorrelated significantly, with the exception of team leaders' evaluations of teamwork, which were not related to any other measures. Neither team size nor cumulative experience were correlated with any measures, but teams led by younger leaders performed better than those led by older ones.

CONCLUSION

Team members seem to have better insight into their team's teamwork than team leaders. As a practical consequence, the decision to debrief and the debriefing itself after a resuscitation should be informed by team members, not just leaders.

Trauma team leaders in Canada: A national survey

Introduction

The availability, composition and activation criteria for trauma teams vary across different health care systems, but little is known about these features in the Canadian health system. The aim of this study is to provide a description of the current trauma team available in Level 1 and 2 centres across Canada.

Methods

In 2017, using a modified Dillman technique, a survey was sent to 210 health professionals across all Canadian trauma care facilities, including questions that focused on (1) the presence and the composition of a trauma team, (2) the established criteria to activate this team and (3) the initial patient care.

Results

Overall, 107 (57%) completed surveys were received. Only 22 (11.7%) were from Level 1 or 2 centre and considered for compilation. Seventeen respondents have a trauma team in their centre, and they all shared their criteria for activating their team (1–27 different indications). The suspected injuries, the judgment of the emergency physician, the systolic blood pressure, the Glasgow Coma Score and the respiratory rate were the most frequently mentioned items. In the presence of a pre-hospital care warning, the initial assessment of a severely injured patient is exclusively completed by a member of the trauma team for only 35.1% of the respondents. For 11.8% of respondents, trauma team coordinates airway management. For 64.7% of participants, the trauma team leader is the dedicated care provider to accompany patients until the final destination.

Conclusions

The results suggest a great variability across Canada, regarding the roles assumed by the trauma team but also regarding the activation criteria leading them to take action.

Trauma Response Nurse: Bringing Critical Care Experience and Continuity to Early Trauma Care

Multitrauma patients can benefit significantly from specialized care. Prior to mid-2016, this hospital's trauma team did not include a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) nurse. As the value of bringing this expertise to the patient upon arrival was realized, the role of the trauma response nurse (TRN) was developed. The TRN role was designed to provide a dedicated SICU nurse to care for trauma patients from emergency department (ED) arrival through disposition. The integration of the TRN role into the trauma team sought to improve quality and safety, as well as communication and collaboration, and enhance continuity of care. The primary responsibilities of the TRN were to assist with clinical interventions, transport patients fromthe ED to tests and procedures, and assume care through disposition. Additional TRN duties included education, community outreach, and performance improvement. TRNs now respond to all trauma activations that occur on weekday day shift. This role has improved collaboration between nursing disciplines, improved the overall function of the trauma team, and enhanced the safety of trauma patients during transport. TRNs make valuable contributions to the education and outreach missions of the trauma program and ensure that patients are receiving the highest level of trauma care.

Automatic Clinical Procedure Detection for Emergency Services

Understanding a patient's state is critical to providing optimal care. However, information loss occurs during patient hand-offs (e.g., emergency services (EMS) transferring patient care to a receiving hospital), which hinders care quality. Augmenting the information flow from an EMS vehicle to a receiving hospital may reduce information loss and improve patient outcomes. Such augmentation requires a noninvasive system that can automatically recognize clinical procedures being performed and send near real-time information to a receiving hospital. An automatic clinical procedure detection system that uses wearable sensors, video, and machine-learning to recognize clinical procedures within a controlled environment is presented. The system demonstrated how contextual information and a majority vote method can substantially improve procedure recognition accuracy. Future work concerning computer vision techniques and deep learning are discussed.

Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study of Military Nursing Officers

BACKGROUND

Nurses working in military trauma teams often work in hostile and remote locations. They are faced with the burden of carrying out their duties while ensuring the safety of their patients and themselves in areas of conflict and humanitarian crisis. The stories and experiences of military nurses often go untold. In a phenomenological study, six Australian Defence Force Nursing Officers share their stories of working as members of military trauma teams.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the lived experiences of nursing officers when working as a member of a military trauma team.

METHODS

A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used to conduct this research. In-depth interviews were conducted with six participants.

RESULTS

The following themes were identified: telling their stories; the role-who we are and what we do; the environment-it is so different; training-will it ever fully prepare you; working in teams-there's no "I" in team; and leadership-will the real leader please stand up!

DISCUSSION

This study has provided an insight into the experiences of six Australian military nurses working in trauma teams-experiences that were rarely given voice outside the military. Central to this experience is the need to have these stories told.

Objective Measures of Communication Behavior Predict Clinical Performance

OBJECTIVE

Effective teamwork and communication are critical to patient outcomes, and subjective assessment tools have been studied in predicting team performances. However, inherent biases remain while using subjective assessment tools. This study hypothesizes that objective communication features can assess and predict clinical performance.

DESIGN

Forty 3rd-year medical students participated in the Acute Care Trauma Simulation as the role of doctor, teaming up with a nurse confederate and a simulated patient. Participants conducted postoperative patient management, patient care diagnoses, and treatment. Audio from all team members were recorded, speech variables (e.g., speech duration, number of conversations, etc.) were extracted, and statistical analyses were performed to associate communication with clinical performance.

SETTING

This study was performed at the simulation center located at Fairbanks Hall, Indiana University School of Medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from forty 3rd-year medical students were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Majority (67%) of the communications were initiated by student. Speech ratio, intensity, and frequency of communications differed when students communicate with nurse than with patient (e.g., student communication to patient had higher intensity than nurse). Increasing frequency of check-backs between student and nurse (p < 0.05) and speech duration from student to patient (p = 0.001) positively associated with student's clinical performance score.

CONCLUSION

Objective communication features can predict medical trainee's clinical performance and provide an objective approach for simulation-based trauma care training.

Impact of the academic calendar cycle on survival outcome of injured patients: a retrospective cohort study at a community emergency department in Japan

Background

Commencement of a new academic cycle is presumed to be associated with poor patient outcomes. However, supportive evidence is limited for trauma patients treated in under-resourced hospitals, especially those who require specialized interventions and with little physiological reserve. We examined whether a new academic cycle affects the survival outcomes of injured patients in a typical Japanese teaching hospital.

Methods

This historical cohort study was conducted at a Japanese community emergency department (ED). All injured patients brought to the ED from April 2002 to March 2018 were included in the analysis. The primary exposure was presentation to the ED during the first quartile of the academic cycle (April-June). The primary outcome measure was the hospital mortality rate.

Results

Of the 20,945 eligible patients, 5282 (25.2%) were admitted during the first quartile. In the univariable analysis, the hospital mortality rate was similar between patients admitted during the first quartile of the academic year and those admitted during the remaining quartiles (4.1% vs. 4.4%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.931; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.796-1.088). After adjusting for the potential confounding factors of the injury severity score, age, sex, Glasgow coma scale score, systolic blood pressure, trauma etiology (blunt or penetrating), and admission phase (2002-2005, 2006-2009, 2010-2013, and 2014-2018), no statistically significant association was present between first-quartile admission and trauma death (adjusted OR 0.980; 95% CI 0.748-1.284). Likewise, when patients were subgrouped according to age of > 55 years, injury severity score of > 15, Glasgow coma scale score of < 9, systolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg, requirement for doctor car system dispatches, emergency operation, emergency endotracheal intubation, and weekend and night presentation, no significant associations were present between first-quartile admission and hospital mortality in both the univariable and multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

At a community hospital in Japan, admission at the beginning of the academic year was not associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality among trauma patients, even those requiring specialized interventions and with little physiological reserve. Our results support the uniformity of trauma care provision throughout the academic cycle in a typical Japanese trauma system.

Effects of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitations on ATLS adherence, team performance, and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

In this systematic literature review, the effects of the application of a checklist during in hospital resuscitation of trauma patients on adherence to the ATLS guidelines, trauma team performance, and patient-related outcomes were integrated.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist. The search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane inception till January 2019. Randomized controlled- or controlled before-and-after study design were included. All other forms of observational study designs, reviews, case series or case reports, animal studies, and simulation studies were excluded. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Three of the 625 identified articles were included, which all used a before-and-after study design. Two studies showed that Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)-related tasks are significantly more frequently performed when a checklist was applied during resuscitation. [14 of 30 tasks (p < 0.05), respectively, 18 of 19 tasks (p < 0.05)]. One study showed that time to task completion (- 9 s, 95% CI = - 13.8 to - 4.8 s) and workflow improved, which was analyzed as model fitness (0.90 vs 0.96; p < 0.001); conformance frequency (26.1% vs 77.6%; p < 0.001); and frequency of unique workflow traces (31.7% vs 19.1%; p = 0.005). One study showed that the incidence of pneumonia was higher in the group where a checklist was applied [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.69, 95% Confidence Interval (CI 1.03-2.80)]. No difference was found for nine other assessed complications or missed injuries. Reduced mortality rates were found in the most severely injured patient group (Injury Severity score > 25, aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a checklist may improve ATLS adherence and workflow during trauma resuscitation. Current literature is insufficient to truly define the effect of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitation on patient-related outcomes, although one study showed promising results as an improved chance of survival for the most severely injured patients was found.