Managing obstetric bleeding in Wales: A qualitative evaluation of the OBS Cymru care bundle using Normalisation Process Theory

BACKGROUND

Post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. The Obstetric Bleeding Strategy (OBS) care bundle for PPH management was adopted into Welsh national guidelines in 2019 (as OBS Cymru), and is currently being implemented across 36 sites in the rest of the UK through the OBS UK stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. We conducted a qualitative evaluation of the OBS care bundle five years after its adoption to inform plans for optimising its implementation across the UK.

METHODS

We conducted ethnographic observations, informal conversations and qualitative interviews with multidisciplinary teams (MDT) in four maternity units in Wales. Data were analysed thematically and using Normalisation Process Theory.

RESULTS

The OBS Cymru protocol was used daily and MDT members believe it improves the quality and safety of PPH management. The paper proforma supporting OBS Cymru was the 'boundary object' that kept the care bundle in view while clarifying individualised roles across the MDT during a PPH and prompting improved and continuous communication as bleeding progressed. The standardisation of processes through the care bundle was seen as enabling all staff with an overall knowledge of PPH care, while situating the prominence of their particular roles within a greater whole. Enacting the bundle in practice varied slightly across different settings, according to staffing structures (e.g., in delivery rooms versus theatre births) and caseload, and some residual tensions remained regarding expectations from different staff members and levels of support provided regarding OBS Cymru.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some small-scale variations, OBS care bundle has become normalised as standard PPH care in Wales. Insights from this evaluation, such as the centrality of the proforma in holding the bundle together, and need for greater clarity in staff role expectations, have informed implementation plans for the OBS UK trial.

Transfusion of blood and blood products for the management of postpartum haemorrhage

RATIONALE

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is commonly defined as blood loss of 500 mL or greater within 24 hours after birth. Intravenous transfusions of whole blood, red blood cells (RBC), or other blood components collected from a donor may be administered to manage PPH. Key questions remain regarding optimal timing for initiating blood and blood product transfusion in managing PPH and whether the use of fractionated blood products, either as replacement for or in addition to whole blood transfusion, could improve maternal outcomes. No systematic review has examined appropriate transfusion strategies for managing PPH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of transfusion of whole blood or other blood products for preventing morbidity and mortality among women with PPH.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify studies for inclusion in the review. The latest search was 18 July 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomised trials, or controlled non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) evaluating the efficacy and safety of blood transfusion for managing PPH, regardless of the mode of birth.

OUTCOMES

Our critical outcomes were maternal death, severe maternal morbidity, and adverse effects.

RISK OF BIAS

We assessed risk of bias in included studies using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We synthesised results for each outcome within each comparison using meta-analysis where possible, and used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included 12 studies with 17,868 participants. We excluded five NRSIs from outcome analyses due to critical risk of bias related to confounding.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

One threshold for initiating transfusion versus another threshold for initiating transfusion None of the studies assessed this comparison. One- to two-unit RBCs versus no transfusion Among women with moderate blood loss, low-certainty evidence from one NRSI found that transfusing 1 to 2 units of RBCs to treat PPH may increase severe maternal morbidity - composite excluding intensive care unit (ICU) admission (risk ratio (RR) 7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.75 to 17.80; 2130 women) and severe maternal morbidity - ICU admission (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.75; 2130 women), though we have substantial concerns about the potential bias due to confounding as the volume of blood lost was not controlled for in the analysis. The study did not report maternal death or adverse effects. Packed RBCs versus whole blood versus combination of blood products One NRSI assessed this comparison but had critical risk of bias and was subsequently excluded from analysis. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP)/RBCs with fibrinogen concentrate versus FFP/RBCs alone One NRSI assessed this comparison but had critical risk of bias and was subsequently excluded from analysis. Fibrinogen concentrate versus placebo or no fibrinogen concentrate The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of fibrinogen concentrate on maternal death (0 events; 2 studies, 674 women; very low-certainty evidence). Fibrinogen concentrate probably results in little to no difference in severe maternal morbidity - ICU admission (RR 1.09,0 95% CI 0.80 to 1.49; 2 studies, 485 women; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of fibrinogen concentrate on severe maternal morbidity - arterial embolisation (1 study, 430 women; very low-certainty evidence). One RCT (430 women) and one NRSI (730 women) reported severe maternal morbidity - hysterectomy, each of which reported different directions of effect with low-certainty evidence. Fibrinogen concentrate may result in little to no difference in adverse effect - thromboembolic events (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.95; 2 studies, 674 women; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of fibrinogen concentrate on additional adverse effects, such as shivering or fever (1 study, 244 women; very low-certainty evidence). Cryoprecipitate versus no cryoprecipitate The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of cryoprecipitate on maternal death. One RCT (0 deaths; 180 women; very low-certainty evidence) and one NRSI (0 deaths; 157 women; very low-certainty evidence) reported this outcomes. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effects of cryoprecipitate on severe maternal morbidity - ICU admission, severe maternal morbidity - any organ failure, severe maternal morbidity - laparotomy, or severe maternal morbidity - uterine artery embolisation (1 study, 180 women; very low-certainty evidence). One RCT (180 women; very low-certainty evidence) and one NRSI (157 women; very low-certainty evidence) reported severe maternal morbidity - hysterectomy and the evidence is very uncertain. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effects of cryoprecipitate on adverse effects, such as thromboembolic events or transfusion-related reactions (1 study, 180 women; very low-certainty evidence). Massive transfusion protocol versus no massive transfusion protocol Two NRSIs assessed this comparison but had critical risk of bias and were subsequently excluded from analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, available evidence for the effects of blood and blood product transfusion on priority maternal outcomes is largely uncertain. Low-certainty evidence suggests that 1 to 2 units of RBC transfusion may increase the risk of severe maternal morbidity; however, we urge caution when interpreting this finding as the effect estimates are at serious risk of bias due to possible confounding. We are unable to comment on the effects of larger blood transfusion amounts on severe maternal morbidity.

FUNDING

This review received no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

This protocol for this Cochrane review is registered with PROSPERO. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024599608.

Fibrinogen as a potential diagnostic marker for prediction and evaluation of postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether prenatal fibrinogen (FIB) or other related factors could be utilized to evaluate the risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a database from January 2015 to December 2019. A total of 128 patients were enrolled and evaluated with FIB, in which 55 patients were assigned to low FIB and 73 in normal FIB.

RESULTS

According to the volume of blood loss, the mean of the low FIB group (<4 g/L) was markedly higher than that of the normal FIB group (≥4 g/L). Prenatal FIB was negatively correlated with PPH volume. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve results indicated that the value of prenatal FIB was 0.701 to predict refractory PPH.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal FIB was significantly related to thrombin time (TT), which may be an independent factor to predict the coagulation state of prenatal pregnancy.

Early viscoelastometric guided fibrinogen replacement combined with escalation of clinical care reduces progression in postpartum haemorrhage: a comparison of outcomes from two prospective observational studies

BACKGROUND

Viscoelastometric haemostatic assays (VHA) give rapid information on coagulation status, allowing individualised resuscitation.

METHODS

This paper compares outcomes from two observational studies of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the same institution, before and after practice changed from fixed ratio empirical transfusion of coagulation products with laboratory coagulation testing to VHA-guided fibrinogen replacement incorporated into an enhanced PPH care bundle. In both studies, all blood samples were taken near 1000 mL qualitative blood loss (QBL). In Study One, QBL started once PPH was identified, and resuscitation with coagulation blood products was empirical or based on laboratory tests of coagulation. In Study Two, QBL started at delivery and VHA was used to guide fibrinogen replacement if FIBTEM A5 was <12 mm (Claus fibrinogen ≤2 g/L) or to withhold coagulation products if FIBTEM A5 was >12 mm.

RESULTS

Improved PPH outcomes were observed in Study Two, with rates of measured blood loss ≥2500 mL, ≥4 units red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, fresh frozen plasma transfusion and ≥8 units of any blood product transfusion all reduced (P < 0.01). Clinically significant improvements occurred in women with fibrinogen ≤2 g/L at study entry, where the proportion of women who received ≥4 units RBC transfusion fell from 67% in Study One to 0% in Study Two (P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that use of VHA as part of an early bundle of PPH care targeting fibrinogen ≤2 g/L with fibrinogen concentrate reduces PPH progression. The greatest benefit was seen when fibrinogen levels were ≤2 g/L at first testing.

The role of viscoelastic hemostatic assays for postpartum hemorrhage management and bedside intrapartum care

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays are point-of-care devices that assess coagulation and fibrinolysis in whole blood samples. These technologies provide numeric and visual information of clot initiation, clot strength, and clot lysis under low-shear conditions, and have been used in a variety of clinical settings and subpopulations, including trauma, cardiac surgery, and obstetrics. Emerging data indicate that these devices are useful for detecting important coagulation defects during major postpartum hemorrhage (especially low plasma fibrinogen concentration [hypofibrinogenemia]) and informing clinical decision-making for blood product use. Data from observational studies suggest that, compared with traditional formulaic approaches to transfusion management, targeted or goal-directed transfusion approaches using data from viscoelastic hemostatic assays are associated with reduced hemorrhage-related morbidity and lower blood product requirement. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays can also be used to identify and treat coagulation defects in patients with inherited or acquired coagulation disorders, such as factor XI deficiency or immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, and to assess hemostatic profiles of patients prescribed anticoagulant medications to mitigate the risk of epidural hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum hemorrhage after delivery.

What do we know about why women bleed and what do we not know?

Women or people with a uterus are vulnerable to both normal and abnormal bleeding. During the reproductive years, the uterus is prepared physiologically to accept an embryo and support its growth and development during pregnancy, or in the absence of implantation of an embryo, recycle through the process of menstruation and accept an embryo a month or so later. If fertilization takes place and an embryo or embryos implant in the uterus, the fetal trophoblast, or outer cell layer of the embryo, invades and dilates the maternal spiral arteries and forms the placenta. No matter when in gestation a pregnancy ends, at the conclusion of pregnancy, the placenta should separate from the wall of the uterus and be expelled. Abnormal bleeding occurs during pregnancy or after delivery when the normal uteroplacental interface has not been established or is interrupted; during miscarriage; during ectopic pregnancy; during premature separation of the placenta; or during postpartum hemorrhage. Heavy menstrual bleeding, a subset of abnormal menstrual bleeding, can be quantitatively defined as >80 mL of blood loss per cycle. Unlike postpartum hemorrhage, heavy menstrual bleeding is significantly associated with an underlying bleeding disorder. While there is other reproductive tract bleeding in women, notably bleeding at the time of ovulation or with a life-threatening ruptured ectopic pregnancy, the unique bleeding that women experience is predominantly uterine in origin. Many of the unique aspects of uterine hemostasis, however, remain unknown.

Viscoelastic Testing Methods

Viscoelastic testing methods examine the real-time formation of a clot in a whole blood sample, and include thromboelastography (TEG), rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), and several other testing platforms. They allow for concurrent assessment of multiple aspects of clotting, including plasmatic coagulation factors, platelets, fibrinogen, and the fibrinolytic pathway. This testing is rapid and may be performed at the point-of-care, allowing for prompt identification of coagulopathies to guide focused and rational administration of blood products as well as the identification of anticoagulant effect. With recent industry progression towards user-friendly, cartridge-based, portable instruments, viscoelastic testing has emerged in the 21st century as a powerful tool to guide blood transfusions in the bleeding patient, and to identify and treat both bleeding and thrombotic conditions in many operative settings, including trauma surgery, liver transplant surgery, cardiac surgery, and obstetrics. In these settings, the use of transfusion algorithms guided by viscoelastic testing data has resulted in widespread improvements in patient blood management as well as modest improvements in select patient outcomes. To address the increasingly wide adoption of viscoelastic methods and the growing number of medical and laboratory personnel tasked with implementing, performing, and interpreting these methods, this chapter provides an overview of the history, physiology, and technology behind viscoelastic testing, as well as a practical review of its clinical utility and current evidence supporting its use. Also included is a review of testing limitations and the contextual role played by viscoelastic methods among all coagulation laboratory testing.

Review of Thromboelastography (TEG): Medical and Surgical Applications

Thromboelastography (TEG) is a laboratory assay utilized to evaluate hemostatic properties of blood, identify coagulopathy, and guide blood product administration. While the clinical use of TEG started in the care of surgical patients, the assay has now been incorporated more routinely in the care of the medical patient as well. In this review, we explore the evolution of TEG from the historical perspective of its inception to the current state of the art of the assay. The TEG procedure and its measurements are illustrated along with a table that summarizes recommendations from across the medical and surgical literature. After each section, we review salient learning points to provide the busy clinician with information that can be immediately integrated at the bedside. We conclude with a series of summary questions to check for comprehension and direct the reader to additional resources to improve their knowledge of TEG.

Anesthesia Considerations for Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Anesthesiologists are critical members of the multidisciplinary team managing patients with suspected placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). Preoperatively, anesthesiologists provide predelivery consultation for patients with suspected PAS where anesthetic modality and invasive monitor placement is discussed. Additionally, anesthesiologists carefully assess patient and surgical risk factors to choose an anesthetic plan and to prepare for massive intraoperative hemorrhage. Postoperatively, the obstetric anesthesiologist hold unique skills to assist with postoperative pain management for cesarean hysterectomy. We review the unique aspects of peripartum care for patients with PAS who undergo cesarean hysterectomy and explain why these responsibilities are critical for achieving successful outcomes for patients with PAS. KEY POINTS: · Anesthesiologists are critical members of the multidisciplinary team planning for patients with suspected placenta accreta spectrum.. · Intraoperative preparation for massive hemorrhage is a key component of anesthetic care for patients with PAS.. · Obstetric anesthesiologists have a unique skill set to manage postpartum pain and postoperative disposition for patients with PAS who undergo cesarean hysterectomy..

Acute obstetric coagulopathy during postpartum hemorrhage is caused by hyperfibrinolysis and dysfibrinogenemia: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) may be exacerbated by hemostatic impairment. Information about PPH-associated coagulopathy is limited, often resulting in treatment strategies based on data derived from trauma studies.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate hemostatic changes associated with PPH.

PATIENTS/METHODS

From a population of 11 279 maternities, 518 (4.6%) women were recruited with PPH ≥ 1000 mL or placental abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, or concealed bleeding. Routine coagulation and viscoelastometric results were collated. Stored plasma samples were used to investigate women with bleeds > 2000 mL or those at increased risk of coagulopathy defined as placenta abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, or need for blood components. Procoagulant factors were assayed and global hemostasis was assessed using thrombin generation. Fibrinolysis was investigated with D-dimer and plasmin/antiplasmin complexes. Dysfibrinogenemia was assessed using the Clauss/antigen ratio.

RESULTS

At 1000 mL blood loss, Clauss fibrinogen was ≤2 g/L in 2.4% of women and 6/27 (22.2%) cases of abruption. Women with very large bleeds (>3000 mL) had evidence of a dilutional coagulopathy, although hemostatic impairment was uncommon. A subgroup of 12 women (1.06/1000 maternities) had a distinct coagulopathy characterized by massive fibrinolysis (plasmin/antiplasmin > 40 000 ng/mL), increased D-dimer, hypofibrinogenemia, dysfibrinogenemia, reduced factor V and factor VIII, and increased activated protein C, termed acute obstetric coagulopathy. It was associated with fetal or neonatal death in 50% of cases and increased maternal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically significant hemostatic impairment is uncommon during PPH, but a subgroup of women have a distinct and severe coagulopathy characterized by hyperfibrinolysis, low fibrinogen, and dysfibrinogenemia associated with poor fetal outcomes.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

The Role of Thromboelastography during the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage: Background, Evidence, and Practical Application

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common cause of significant maternal morbidity and mortality that can be associated with coagulopathy, especially hypofibrinogenemia. There is interest in point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assays (POC-VHA) in PPH because prompt knowledge of coagulation status can aid diagnosis, identify cases of severe coagulopathy, and allow ongoing monitoring during rapid bleeding. The incidence of coagulopathy in most cases of PPH is low because of the procoagulant state of pregnancy, including raised fibrinogen levels of around 4 to 6 g/L. A Clauss fibrinogen of >2 g/L or POC-VHA equivalent has been found to be adequate for hemostasis during PPH. POC-VHA has been used successfully to diagnose hypofibrinogenemia (Clauss fibrinogen of ≤2 g/L) and guide fibrinogen treatment which has reduced bleed size and complications of massive transfusion. There are uncertainties about the use of POC-VHA to direct fresh frozen plasma and platelet administration during PPH. Several POC-VHA algorithms have been used successfully incorporated in the management of many thousands of PPHs and clinicians report that they are easy to use, interpret, and aid decision making. Due to the relative cost of POC-VHA and lack of definitive data on improving outcomes, these devices have not been universally adopted during PPH.

Rotational thromboelastometry during Cesarean section as a predictive evaluation for the progression of persistent postpartum hemorrhage in parturients with placenta previa: A prospective observational study

Background

The rotational thromboelastogram (ROTEM) has been used in the management of massive bleeding and transfusion strategy. This study investigated ROTEM parameters measured during Cesarean section as predictors for the progression of persistent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in parturients with placenta previa.

Methods

This prospective observational study recruited 100 women scheduled for elective Cesarean section after being diagnosed with placenta previa. Recruited women were divided into two groups according to the amount of estimated blood loss: the PPH group (PPH > 1500 ml) vs. the non-PPH group. ROTEM with laboratory tests was performed three times, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time, which were compared between the two groups.

Results

The PPH and non-PPH groups included 57 and 41 women, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of postoperative FIBTEM A5 to detect PPH was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.64 to 0.87; P < 0.001). When postoperative FIBTEM A5 was 9.5, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55 to 0.88) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.86), respectively. When subgrouping the PPH group based on the postoperative FIBTEM A5 value of 9.5, intraoperative cEBL was similar between the two subgroups; however, postoperative RBC was transfused more in the subgroup with FIBTEM A5 < 9.5 than the subgroup with FIBTEM A5 ≥ 9.5 (7.4 ± 3.0 vs 5.1 ± 2.3 units, respectively; P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Postoperative FIBTEM A5, with appropriate selection of the cut-off value, can be a biomarker for more prolonged PPH and massive transfusion following Cesarean section by placenta previa.

Thromboelastometry-guided treatment algorithm in postpartum haemorrhage: a randomised, controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage causes significant mortality among parturients. Early transfusion of blood products based on clinical judgement and conventional coagulation testing has been adapted to the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage, but rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may provide clinicians means for a goal-directed therapy to control coagulation. We conducted a parallel design, randomised, controlled trial comparing these two approaches. We hypothesised that a ROTEM-guided protocol would decrease the need for red blood cell transfusion.

METHODS

We randomised 60 parturients with postpartum haemorrhage of more than 1500 ml to receive either ROTEM-guided or conventional treatment, with 54 patients included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was consumption of blood products, and secondarily we assessed for possible side-effects of managing blood loss such as thromboembolic complications, infections, and transfusion reactions.

RESULTS

The median (25th-75th percentile) number of RBC units transfused was 2 (1-4) in the ROTEM group and 3 (2-4) in the control group (P=0.399). The median number of OctaplasLG® units given was 0 in both groups (0-0 and 0-2) (P=0.030). The median total estimated blood loss was 2500 ml (2100-3000) in the ROTEM group and 3000 ml (2200-3100) in the control group (P=0.033). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

ROTEM-guided treatment of postpartum haemorrhage could have a plasma-sparing effect but possibly only a small reduction in total blood loss.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02461251.

The role of point of care thromboelastography (TEG) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in management of Primary postpartum haemorrhage: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

The utility of instantaneous evaluation of coagulation during primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is paramount in the context of empirical blood product transfusion-related risk of dilutional and consumptive coagulopathy and circulatory overload.

Methods

A profound screening of electronic databases till August 15, 2022 was carried out after being enlisted in PROSPERO (CRD42021275514). Randomized control studies, comparative cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies comparing point-of-care viscoelastic test guided blood product transfusion with empirical transfusion in patients with PPH were included.

Results

We retrieved five studies, with a total of 1914 parturient with PPH. Patients receiving transfusion based upon point of care viscoelastic tests had lesser risk of having emergency hysterectomy (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.95, I2 = 7%), transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) (OR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.00-0.50), reduced transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04-0.14, I2 = 89%), platelets (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91, I2 = 89%), packed red blood cell transfusion (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.88, I2 = 89%), and had better cost-effective treatment [Mean difference (MD) = -357.5, 95% CI - 567.75 to -147.25, I2 = 93%] than patient received empirical transfusion. However, there was no significant difference in the requirement of ICU admissions (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.46-1.29, I2 = 82%). No mortality was detected across the studies.

Conclusions

Point of care viscoelastic assessment guided transfusion in PPH confederates with reduced morbidity. Nevertheless, more studies on the triggering values for transfusion, long-term survival, and cost-benefit in patients with PPH are warranted to establish its utility.

Comparative retrospective study on the validity of point-of-care testing device for massive obstetrical hemorrhage: dry hematology vs thromboelastography

BACKGROUND

Early recognition of hypofibrinogenemia and prompt initiation of transfusion therapy in patients with massive obstetrical hemorrhage can improve prognosis. There are reports on the usefulness of point-of-care testing, which provides quicker test results compared with fibrinogen measurements using the conventional Clauss method.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare and investigate the diagnostic accuracy of dry hematology and thromboelastography in point-of-care testing for the diagnosis of hypofibrinogenemia.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center, retrospective study of 126 massive obstetrical hemorrhage cases with point-of-care testing before treatment was initiated. The correlation of fibrinogen values with the Clauss method and the diagnostic accuracy for hypofibrinogenemia were compared between dry hematology and thromboelastography.

RESULTS

Fibrinogen value in dry hematology showed a strong positive correlation with values measured by the Clauss method, and the diagnostic accuracy for hypofibrinogenemia was high, but there were many residuals above 100 mg/dL, and the distribution of these residuals was not uniform. Although thromboelastography cannot be used to directly measure fibrinogen values, maximum amplitude citrated functional fibrinogen, amplitude-10 citrated rapid thromboelastography, and amplitude-10 citrated functional fibrinogen showed a strong positive correlation with fibrinogen values using the Clauss method, and no significant difference in correlation or diagnostic accuracy was observed relative to dry hematology.

CONCLUSION

Dry hematology and thromboelastography were equally accurate in diagnosing hypofibrinogenemia, with results correlating well with fibrinogen values measured by the Clauss method.

SHock-INduced Endotheliopathy (SHINE): A mechanistic justification for viscoelastography-guided resuscitation of traumatic and non-traumatic shock

Irrespective of the reason for hypoperfusion, hypocoagulable and/or hyperfibrinolytic hemostatic aberrancies afflict up to one-quarter of critically ill patients in shock. Intensivists and traumatologists have embraced the concept of SHock-INduced Endotheliopathy (SHINE) as a foundational derangement in progressive shock wherein sympatho-adrenal activation may cause systemic endothelial injury. The pro-thrombotic endothelium lends to micro-thrombosis, enacting a cycle of worsening perfusion and increasing catecholamines, endothelial injury, de-endothelialization, and multiple organ failure. The hypocoagulable/hyperfibrinolytic hemostatic phenotype is thought to be driven by endothelial release of anti-thrombogenic mediators to the bloodstream and perivascular sympathetic nerve release of tissue plasminogen activator directly into the microvasculature. In the shock state, this hemostatic phenotype may be a counterbalancing, yet maladaptive, attempt to restore blood flow against a systemically pro-thrombotic endothelium and increased blood viscosity. We therefore review endothelial physiology with emphasis on glycocalyx function, unique biomarkers, and coagulofibrinolytic mediators, setting the stage for understanding the pathophysiology and hemostatic phenotypes of SHINE in various etiologies of shock. We propose that the hyperfibrinolytic phenotype is exemplified in progressive shock whether related to trauma-induced coagulopathy, sepsis-induced coagulopathy, or post-cardiac arrest syndrome-associated coagulopathy. Regardless of the initial insult, SHINE appears to be a catecholamine-driven entity which early in the disease course may manifest as hyper- or hypocoagulopathic and hyper- or hypofibrinolytic hemostatic imbalance. Moreover, these hemostatic derangements may rapidly evolve along the thrombohemorrhagic spectrum depending on the etiology, timing, and methods of resuscitation. Given the intricate hemochemical makeup and changes during these shock states, macroscopic whole blood tests of coagulative kinetics and clot strength serve as clinically useful and simple means for hemostasis phenotyping. We suggest that viscoelastic hemostatic assays such as thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are currently the most applicable clinical tools for assaying global hemostatic function-including fibrinolysis-to enable dynamic resuscitation with blood products and hemostatic adjuncts for those patients with thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic complications in shock states.

Recent advances in obstetric anaesthesia and critical care

Newer modalities in labour analgesia and anaesthesia for caesarean section including regional anaesthesia techniques and airway management are emerging constantly. Techniques such as point of care ultrasound, especially of the lungs and stomach and point of care tests of coagulation based on viscoelastometry are about to revolutionise perioperative obstetric care. This has improved the quality of care thereby ensuring good perioperative outcomes in the parturient with comorbidities. Critical care for obstetrics is an emerging field that requires a multidisciplinary approach with obstetricians, maternal-foetal medicine experts, intensivists, neonatologists, and anaesthesiologists working together with enhanced preparedness and uniform protocols. Newer techniques and concepts of understanding have thus been established in the traditional speciality of obstetric anaesthesia over the last decade. These have improved maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. This article touches upon some recent advances that have made a significant impact in the field of obstetric anaesthesia and critical care.

Point-of-care coagulation testing for postpartum haemorrhage

The use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHAs) to guide blood product replacement during postpartum haemorrhage is expanding. Rotem and TEG devices can be used to detect and treat clinically significant hypofibrinogenaemia, although evidence to support the role of VHAs for guiding fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusion is less clear. If Rotem/TEG traces are normal, clinicians should investigate for another cause of bleeding, and haemostatic support is not required. Guidelines support the use of VHAs during postpartum haemorrhage as part of locally agreed algorithms. There is a wide consensus that fibrinogen replacement is needed if the Fibtem A5 is <12 mm and if there is ongoing bleeding. Guidelines recommend against using VHAs to guide tranexamic acid infusion, and this drug should be given as soon as bleeding is recognised, irrespective of the Rotem/TEG traces. The cost-effectiveness of VHAs during postpartum haemorrhage needs to be addressed.

The Choice between Plasma-Based Common Coagulation Tests and Cell-Based Viscoelastic Tests in Monitoring Hemostatic Competence: Not an either-or Proposition

There has been a significant interest in the last decade in the use of viscoelastic tests (VETs) to determine the hemostatic competence of bleeding patients. Previously, common coagulation tests (CCTs) such as the prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were used to assist in the guidance of blood component and hemostatic adjunctive therapy for these patients. However, the experience of decades of VET use in liver failure with transplantation, cardiac surgery, and trauma has now spread to obstetrical hemorrhage and congenital and acquired coagulopathies. Since CCTs measure only 5 to 10% of the lifespan of a clot, these assays have been found to be of limited use for acute surgical and medical conditions, whereby rapid results are required. However, there are medical indications for the PT/PTT that cannot be supplanted by VETs. Therefore, the choice of whether to use a CCT or a VET to guide blood component therapy or hemostatic adjunctive therapy may often require consideration of both methodologies. In this review, we provide examples of the relative indications for CCTs and VETs in monitoring hemostatic competence of bleeding patients.

Viscoelastic haemostatic point-of-care assays in the management of postpartum haemorrhage: a narrative review

Viscoelastic haemostatic assays provide rapid testing at the bed-side that identify all phases of haemostasis, from initial fibrin formation to clot lysis. In obstetric patients, altered haemostasis is common as pregnancy is associated with coagulation changes that may contribute to bleeding events such as postpartum haemorrhage, as well as thrombosis events. In this narrative review, we examine the potential clinical utility of viscoelastic haemostatic assays in postpartum haemorrhage and consider the current recommendations for their use in obstetric patients. We discuss the clinical benefits associated with the use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays due to the provision of (near) real-time readouts with a short turnaround, coupled with the identification of coagulation defects such as hypofibrinogenaemia. The use of viscoelastic haemostatic assay-guided algorithms may be beneficial to diagnose coagulopathy, predict postpartum haemorrhage, reduce transfusion requirements and monitor fibrinolysis in women with obstetric haemorrhage. Further studies are required to assess whether viscoelastic haemostatic assay-guided treatment improves clinical outcomes, and to confirm the utility of prepartum viscoelastic haemostatic assay measurements for identifying patients at risk of postpartum haemorrhage.

Disparities in obstetric hemorrhage outcomes

Both the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy vary greatly according to a pregnant woman’s community and her condition. The most devastating outcome is the death of a mother. In 2017, there were ≈295,000 maternal deaths globally with dramatic differences in maternal mortality based on geographic region, country, and women’s underlying conditions. Worldwide, the leading cause of maternal death is hemorrhage, comprising 94% of maternal deaths, with most cases occurring in low‐ or middle‐income countries. Whether a hemorrhage originates from inside the uterus (80%‐90%), from lacerations or incisions (10%‐20%), or from an underlying coagulopathy (<1%), an acute acquired coagulopathy will evolve unless the hemorrhage is controlled. In low‐ or middle‐income countries, the full range of resources to control hemorrhage is not available, but besides the usual obstetric measures, blood availability, hemostatic medication, and hematologic expertise are necessary to save mothers’ lives. Hemostasis and thrombosis experts can address the disparities in obstetric hemorrhage outcomes not only as providers but as consultants, researchers, and advocates.

DIC in Pregnancy - Pathophysiology, Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Scores, and Treatments

Obstetrical hemorrhage and especially DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) is a leading cause for maternal mortality across the globe, often secondary to underlying maternal and/or fetal complications including placental abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets), retained stillbirth and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Various obstetrical disorders can present with DIC as a complication; thus, increased awareness is key to diagnosing the condition. DIC patients can present to clinicians who may not be experienced in a variety of aspects of thrombosis and hemostasis. Hence, DIC diagnosis is often only entertained when the patient already developed uncontrollable bleeding or multi-organ failure, all of which represent unsalvageable scenarios. Beyond the clinical presentations, the main issue with DIC diagnosis is in relation to coagulation test abnormalities. It is widely believed that in DIC, patients will have prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT), thrombocytopenia, low fibrinogen, and raised D-dimers. Diagnosis of DIC can be elusive during pregnancy and requires vigilance and knowledge of the physiologic changes during pregnancy. It can be facilitated by using a pregnancy specific DIC score including three components: 1) fibrinogen concentrations; 2) the PT difference - relating to the difference in PT result between the patient's plasma and the laboratory control; and 3) platelet count. At a cutoff of ≥26 points, the pregnancy specific DIC score has 88% sensitivity, 96% specificity, a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 22, and a negative LR of 0.125. Management of DIC during pregnancy requires a prompt attention to the underlying condition leading to this complication, including the delivery of the patient, and correction of the hemostatic problem that can be guided by point of care testing adjusted for pregnancy.

Postpartum hemorrhage in maternal mothers at Anutapura Public Hospital in Palu, 2017

OBJECTIVE

Postpartum hemorrhage is one of the factors causing maternal mortality in Indonesia. In Indonesia, at least 128.000 women suffer from hemorrhage, causing them to death. Data from the Anutapura Public Hospital in Palu showed that the rate of postpartum hemorrhage within 2015-2017 was fluctuated and still caused maternal mortality. This study aimed to determine the risk factors of the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage in maternal mothers at Anutapura Public Hospital, Palu.

METHOD

The type of study was observational with a case-control approach. The subject of the study was mothers having a postpartum hemorrhage. The total sample of this study was 50 people as the case group and 100 people as the control group by adjusting the types of labor. Sampling was done using a total sampling technique. The data were analyzed using an odds ratio test with α=5%.

RESULT

This study showed that anemia (OR=2.874 and CI=1.421-5.812), parity (OR=3.995 and CI=1.952-8.174), age (OR=2.874 and CI=1.421-5.812) were the risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage in women.

CONCLUSION

The anemia, parity, and age are the risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage in women. The importance of increasing ANC (antenatal care) visits is to control maternal and fetal health and provide information through a medical consultation about the importance of planning a good pregnancy.

The sensitivity and specificity of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to detect coagulopathy during moderate and severe postpartum haemorrhage: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Point-of-care viscoelastic haemostatic assays such as rotational thromboelastometry (including ROTEM and TEG) have been used in the management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). This study compared results obtained from the automated ROTEM Sigma with laboratory tests of coagulation and platelet count during PPH.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study recruited women with PPH ≥1000 mL (or clinical concern of bleeding). The Fibtem A5, Extem CT and Pltem (Extem A5 - Fibtem A5) results were compared with laboratory tests of fibrinogen, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and platelet count.

RESULTS

521 women were recruited, including 274/277 (98.9%) of women with PPH ≥1500 mL. Fibtem A5 results were matched with laboratory fibrinogen in 552/644 (85.7%) samples. The incidence of abnormal laboratory results was low: fibrinogen ≤2 g/L 23/464 (5.0%), PT or APTT >1.5 × midpoint of reference range 4/464 (0.9%), and platelet count <75 × 10⁹/L 11/477 (2.3%). Area-under- the-receiver operator characteristic curve for Fibtem A5 to detect fibrinogen ≤2 g/L was 0.96 (95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 0.94 to 0.98, P<0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of Fibtem A5 ≤11 mm to detect fibrinogen ≤2 g/L of 0.76 and 0.96. Prolonged Extem CT results improved after treatment of hypofibrinogenaemia alone. Intervention points for platelet and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion based on ROTEM Sigma parameters could not be established.

CONCLUSION

During PPH (≥1000 mL or cases of clinical concern about bleeding), ROTEM Sigma Fibtem A5 can detect fibrinogen ≤2 g/L and guide targeted fibrinogen replacement. Laboratory results should continue to be used to guide platelet and FFP transfusion.

Clinical value of early viscoelastometric point-of-care testing during postpartum hemorrhage for the prediction of severity of bleeding: A multicenter prospective cohort study in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate rotational fibrin-based thromboelastometry (ROTEM® FIBTEM) with amplitude of clot firmness at 5 min (A5) as an early point-of-care parameter for predicting progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage, and compare its predictive value with that of fibrinogen.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study in the Netherlands including women with 800-1500 ml of blood loss within 24 h following birth. Blood loss was quantitatively measured by weighing blood-soaked items and using a fluid collector bag in the operating room. Both FIBTEM A5 values and fibrinogen concentrations (Clauss method) were measured between 800 and 1500  ml of blood loss. Predictive accuracy of both biomarkers for the progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage was measured by area under the receiver operating curves (AUC). Severe postpartum hemorrhage was defined as a composite endpoint of (1) total blood loss >2000 ml, (2) transfusion of ≥4 packed cells, and/or (3) need for an invasive intervention to cease bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 391 women included, 72 (18%) developed severe postpartum hemorrhage. Median (IQR) volume of blood loss at blood sampling was 1100 ml (1000-1300) with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) fibrinogen concentration of 3.9 g/L (3.4-4.6) and FIBTEM A5 value of 17 mm (13-20). The AUC for progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.61) for FIBTEM A5 and 0.58 (95% CI 0.50-0.65) for fibrinogen. Positive predictive values for progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage for FIBTEM A5 ≤12 mm was 22.5% (95% CI 14-33) and 50% (95% CI 25-75) for fibrinogen ≤2 g/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive value of FIBTEM A5 compared to fibrinogen concentrations measured between 800 and 1500 ml of blood loss following childbirth was poor to discriminate between women with and without progression towards severe postpartum hemorrhage.

Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays for Postpartum Hemorrhage

This article discusses the importance and effectiveness of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) in assessing hemostatic competence and guiding blood component therapy (BCT) in patients with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). In recent years, VHAs such as thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry have increasingly been used to guide BCT, hemostatic adjunctive therapy and prohemostatic agents in PPH. The three pillars of identifying hemostatic competence include clinical observation, common coagulation tests, and VHAs. VHAs are advantageous because they assess the cumulative contribution of all components of the blood throughout the entire formation of a clot, have fast turnaround times, and are point-of-care tests that can be followed serially. Despite these advantages, VHAs are underused due to poor understanding of correct technique and result interpretation, a paucity of widespread standardization, and a lack of large clinical trials. These VHAs can also be used in cases of uterine atony, preeclampsia, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, amniotic fluid embolism, placental abruption, genital tract trauma, surgical trauma, and inherited and prepartum acquired coagulopathies. There exists an immediate need for a point-of-care test that can equip obstetricians with rapid results on developing coagulopathic states. The use of VHAs in predicting and treating PPH, although in an incipient state, can fulfill this need.

Utility of viscoelastography with TEG 6s to direct management of haemostasis during obstetric haemorrhage: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The TEG 6s is an automated cartridge-based device with limited description of use in obstetric haemorrhage. The aim of this analysis was to describe the utility of TEG 6s in identifying abnormal laboratory results of coagulation and platelet count, and inform an interventional treatment algorithm for postpartum haemorrhage.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study of 521 women with moderate to severe obstetric haemorrhage (>1000 mL blood loss), including 372 women with at least one TEG 6s test. A non-pregnant control group was used for reference. TEG 6s test parameters Citrated Functional Fibrinogen (CFF), Citrated Kaolin TEG (CK) and Citrated Rapid TEG (CRT) were compared with paired laboratory tests of fibrinogen, PT/aPTT and platelet count, obtained during haemorrhage.

RESULTS

Among 456 TEG 6s tests, 389 were matched with laboratory coagulation results. The receiver operator characteristic area-under-the-curve (95% CI) for CFF amplitude by 10 min to detect Clauss fibrinogen ≤2 g/L was 0.95 (0.91 to 0.99) (P<0.0001, sensitivity 0.74 and specificity 0.97 at ≤17 mm). False positives had median (IQR) Clauss fibrinogen of 2.4 (2.3-2.7) g/L. The CK-R time had some utility for detecting prolonged PT/aPTT, however a threshold for fresh frozen plasma transfusion was not established. A CRT maximum amplitude <57 mm, when CFF was ≥15 mm, identified four of eight samples with platelet count <75 × 10⁹/L.

CONCLUSION

The TEG 6s CFF can be used to identify low fibrinogen during obstetric haemorrhage. A value to identify transfusion thresholds for PT/aPTT and platelets was not established, and laboratory results should continue to be used.

Reduction in massive postpartum haemorrhage and red blood cell transfusion during a national quality improvement project, Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales, OBS Cymru: an observational study

Background

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and its incidence is increasing in many countries despite management guidelines. A national quality improvement programme called the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales (OBS Cymru) was introduced in all obstetric units in Wales. The aim was to reduce moderate PPH (1000 mL) progressing to massive PPH (> 2500 mL) and the need for red cell transfusion.

Methods

A PPH care bundle was introduced into all 12 obstetric units in Wales included all women giving birth in 2017 and 2018 (n = 61,094). The care bundle prompted: universal risk assessment, quantitative measurement of blood loss after all deliveries (as opposed to visual estimation), structured escalation to senior clinicians and point-of-care viscoelastometric-guided early fibrinogen replacement. Data were submitted by each obstetric unit to a national database. Outcome measures were incidence of massive PPH (> 2500 mL) and red cell transfusion. Analysis was performed using linear regression of the all Wales monthly data.

Results

Uptake of the intervention was good: quantitative blood loss measurement and risk assessment increased to 98.1 and 64.5% of all PPH > 1000 mL, whilst ROTEM use for PPH > 1500 mL increased to 68.2%. Massive PPH decreased by 1.10 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.92) per 1000 maternities per year (P = 0.011). Fewer women progressed from moderate to massive PPH in the last 6 months, 74/1490 (5.0%), than in the first 6 months, 97/1386 (7.0%), (P = 0.021). Units of red cells transfused decreased by 7.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 13.2) per 1000 maternities per year (P = 0.015). Red cells were transfused to 350/15204 (2.3%) and 268/15150 (1.8%) (P = 0.001) in the first and last 6 months, respectively. There was no increase in the number of women with lowest haemoglobin below 80 g/L during this time period. Infusions of fresh frozen plasma fell and there was no increase in the number of women with haemostatic impairment.

Conclusions

The OBS Cymru care bundle was feasible to implement and associated with progressive, clinically significant improvements in outcomes for PPH across Wales. It is applicable across obstetric units of widely varying size, complexity and staff mixes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03853-y.

Advances in anesthetic and obstetric management of patients with placenta accreta spectrum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum is increasing and it is a leading cause of peripartum hysterectomy and massive postpartum hemorrhage. The purpose of the present article is to provide a contemporary overview of placenta accreta spectrum pertinent to the obstetric anesthesiologist.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent changes in the terminology used to report invasive placentation were proposed to clarify diagnostic criteria and guidelines for use in clinical practice. Reduced morbidity is associated with scheduled preterm delivery in a center of excellence using a multidisciplinary team approach. Neuraxial anesthesia as a primary technique is increasingly being used despite the known risk of major bleeding. The use of viscoelastic testing and endovascular interventions may aid hemostatic resuscitation and improve outcomes.

SUMMARY

Accurate diagnosis and early antenatal planning among team members are essential. Obstetric anesthesiologists should be prepared to manage a massive hemorrhage, transfusion, and associated coagulopathy. Increasingly, viscoelastic tests are being used to assess coagulation status and the ability to interpret these results is required to guide the transfusion regimen. Balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta has been proposed as an intervention that could improve outcomes in women with placenta accreta spectrum, but high-quality safety and efficacy data are lacking.

The incidence, aetiology, and coagulation management of massive postpartum haemorrhage: a two-year national prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Between 2017 and 2018 a national quality improvement initiative was introduced incorporating point-of-care viscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHA) to guide blood product transfusion. Laboratory coagulation profiles, use and results of VHA, and administration of blood products were investigated.

METHODS

A two-year prospective cohort study of maternal outcomes of women experiencing massive postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) >1000 mL in Wales. In this study, cases of massive PPH (≥2500 mL and/or ≥5 units red blood cell (RBC) transfusion) were identified.

RESULTS

Massive PPH occurred in 349 of 60 914 maternities (rate 5.7 per 1000). There were no deaths from PPH. Intensive care unit admission and/or hysterectomy occurred in 34/311 (10.9%) and 16/347 (4.6%), respectively. The leading cause of massive PPH was genital tract trauma (107/349, 30.6%). Two hundred and seventy-nine (80.6%) required RBC transfusion and 79/345 (22.9%) received at least one blood coagulation product. Results of VHA were recorded in 245/349 (70.2%), with 44/98 (44.9%) women tested in the first six months vs 63/77 (81.8%) in the final six months. Hypofibrinogenaemia (Clauss fibrinogen <2 g/L or FIBTEM A5 <12 mm) was observed in 56/328 (17.1%) of women, thrombocytopaenia (count <75 × 10⁹/L) in 17/334 (5.1%) and either PT or aPTT >1.5×reference range in 10/293 (3.4%).

CONCLUSION

In Wales, the use of VHA in cases of massive PPH increased over time, enabling clinicians to adopt a targeted, patient-specific approach to blood product administration, with only 22.9% of women receiving blood coagulation products and 17.1% having a documented clotting abnormality.

When does obstetric coagulopathy occur and how do I manage it?

Anticipating obstetric coagulopathy is important when obstetric anaesthetists are involved in the clinical management of women with postpartum haemorrhage. Although the incidence of coagulopathy in women with postpartum haemorrhage is low, significant hypofibrinogenaemia is associated with major haemorrhage-related morbidity and thus early identification and treatment is essential to improve outcomes. Point-of-care viscoelastic haemostatic assays, including thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry, provide granular information about alterations in clot formation and hypofibrinogenaemia, allow near-patient interpretation of coagulopathy, and can guide goal-directed treatment. If these assays are not available, anaesthetists should closely monitor the maternal coagulation profile with standard laboratory testing during the active phase of postpartum bleeding in order to rule coagulopathy 'in or out', decide if pro-haemostatic therapies are indicated, and assess the response to haemostatic support.

When and how should I transfuse during obstetric hemorrhage?

The incidence of maternal hemorrhage and blood transfusion has increased over time. Causes of massive hemorrhage, defined as a transfusion > 10 units of erythrocytes, include abnormal placental insertion, preeclampsia, and placental abruption. Although ratio-based transfusion has been described for managing massive hemorrhage, a goal-directed approach using laboratory or point-of-care data may lead to better outcomes. Autotransfusion, which involves the collection, washing, and filtration of maternal shed blood, avoids many of the complications associated with allogeneic blood transfusion. In this review, we provide an overview of transfusion practices related to the management of obstetric hemorrhage.

Point-of-care blood clotting test and its correlation with fibrinogen level: Potential in goal-directed transfusion in postpartum hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation of conventional point-of-care clotting test (POCCT) of whole blood with laboratory fibrinogen levels in women with primary major postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) to generate evidence regarding its potential in rationalizing transfusion of blood components for supplementing fibrinogen.

METHODS

A total of 68 samples were studied: 40 from women with primary major PPH, 20 from women without PPH, and eight samples of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP). POCCT was performed in the PPH and non-PPH groups and at the same time, sample for laboratory fibrinogen was sent. Values were correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Depending upon the laboratory fibrinogen values, POCCT in the PPH group was divided into three subgroups of less than 7, 7-11, and more than >11 min as subgroups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

RESULTS

Women in the PPH group (n = 40) had a mean fibrinogen level of 346.15 ± 143.37 mg% with a significant negative correlation with POCCT (r = -0.69, P < 0.001). Mean fibrinogen levels of non-PPH group and FFP samples were 602.1 ± 169.72 and 286.75 ± 103.42 mg%, respectively. PPH subgroups 1, 2, and 3 had mean fibrinogen of 452.2 ± 141.8, 332.58 ± 138.51, and 158.71 ± 145 mg%, respectively. These values may potentially guide FFP transfusions.

CONCLUSION

POCCT is easy, costs nothing and has a potential role in rationalizing FFP transfusion in low- and middle-income countries.

Systematic review of viscoelastic testing (TEG/ROTEM) in obstetrics and recommendations from the women's SSC of the ISTH

Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are point-of-care viscoelastic devices that use whole blood samples to assess coagulation and fibrinolysis. These devices have been studied extensively in cardiac surgery, but there is limited robust evidence supporting its use in obstetrics. The hesitancy toward its routine use in obstetrics may be due to the current lack of randomized controlled trials and large observational studies. The study aims to systematically review studies that investigated TEG/ROTEM use in pregnancy or peripartum, and to provide recommendations for future studies to fill current research gaps. We performed a systematic review of studies on viscoelastic testing in obstetrics. Included studies were original research, used TEG or ROTEM during pregnancy or peripartum, and published in English. Ninety-three studies, spanning 31 years from 1989 to 2020 and with a total of 32,817 participants, were included. Sixty-two (66.7%) of the studies used TEG and 31 (33.3%) used ROTEM. To date, there are a total of two randomized controlled trials on TEG/ROTEM use in obstetrics. ROTEM may be used to guide transfusion therapy for postpartum hemorrhage. TEG and ROTEM can detect the hypercoagulable changes associated with pregnancy. Variability between study protocols and results suggests the need for future large prospective high-quality studies with standardized protocols to investigate the utility of TEG/ROTEM in assessing risk for thrombosis and hemorrhage as well as in guiding prophylaxis and treatment in obstetric patients. This review identifies the gaps and provides concrete recommendations for future studies to fill those gaps.

The role of viscoelastic testing in the management of the parturient

Viscoelastic testing is the measurement of how the viscoelastic properties of blood change as blood clots. In pregnancy, unique changes in clotting function occur overall to make the pregnant woman hypercoagulable. Viscoelastic testing may be able to play a role in guiding placement of epidural and spinal anesthetics by demonstrating enhanced coagulation function, even when there are individual parts of the coagulation system that are abnormal, for example, thrombocytopenia. These tools may also play a role in addressing the management of maternal hemorrhage, which in the United States is on the rise. This review discusses the opportunity to use viscoelastic testing in the parturient.

Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage defined by quantitative blood loss measurement: a national cohort

BACKGROUND

Visual estimation of blood loss following delivery often under-reports actual bleed volume. To improve accuracy, quantitative blood loss measurement was introduced for all births in the 12 hospitals providing maternity care in Wales. This intervention was incorporated into a quality improvement programme (Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales, OBS Cymru). We report the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in Wales over a 1-year period using quantitative measurement.

METHODS

This prospective, consecutive cohort included all 31,341 women giving birth in Wales in 2017. Standardised training was cascaded to maternity staff in all 12 hospitals in Wales. The training comprised mock-scenarios, a video and team drills. Uptake of quantitative blood loss measurement was audited at each centre. Data on postpartum haemorrhage of > 1000 mL were collected and analysed according to mode of delivery. Data on blood loss for all maternities was from the NHS Wales Informatics Service.

RESULTS

Biannual audit data demonstrated an increase in quantitative measurement from 52.1 to 87.8% (P < 0.001). The incidence (95% confidence intervals, CI) of postpartum haemorrhage of > 1000 mL, > 1500 mL and > 2000 mL was 8.6% (8.3 to 8.9), 3.3% (3.1 to 3.5) and 1.3% (1.2 to 1.4), respectively compared to 5%, 2% and 0.8% in the year before OBS Cymru. The incidence (95% CI) of bleeds of > 1000 mL was similar across the 12 hospitals despite widely varied size, staffing levels and case mix, median (25th to 75th centile) 8.6% (7.8-9.6). The incidence of PPH varied with mode of delivery and was mean (95% CI) 4.9% (4.6-5.2) for unassisted vaginal deliveries, 18.4 (17.1-19.8) for instrumental vaginal deliveries, 8.5 (7.7-9.4) for elective caesarean section and 19.8 (18.6-21.0) for non-elective caesarean sections.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative measurement of blood loss is feasible in all hospitals providing maternity care and is associated with detection of higher rates of postpartum haemorrhage. These results have implications for the definition of abnormal blood loss after childbirth and for management and research of postpartum haemorrhage.

How do I manage severe postpartum hemorrhage?

In the United States, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) accounts for 4.6% of all maternal deaths and is responsible for major peripartum medical and surgical morbidity. Therefore, a national health priority is to ensure that women who experience severe PPH receive timely, appropriate, and effective treatment. In this article, we describe our system-wide approach for the planning and delivery of women with suspected placenta accreta spectrum disorder, a condition associated with life-threatening blood loss at the time of delivery. We also highlight current evidence related to transfusion decision making and hemostatic monitoring during active postpartum bleeding. Specifically, we describe how we activate and use the massive transfusion protocol to obtain sufficient volumes and types of blood products. We also describe how we use viscoelastic monitoring (thromboelastography) and standard laboratory tests to assess the maternal coagulation profile. Finally, we review the findings of recent studies examining the potential efficacy of tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate as adjuncts for PPH prevention and treatment. We describe how we have incorporated these drugs into PPH treatment protocols at our institution.

Designing and implementing an all Wales postpartum haemorrhage quality improvement project: OBS Cymru (the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales)

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) contributes to substantial maternal morbidity. Research into PPH has led to improvements in care which have been incorporated into the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales.

INTERVENTION

A national quality improvement team supported local teams in implementing multiple interventions including risk assessment, objective measurement of blood loss, multiprofessional assessment (at the bedside at 1000 mL blood loss) and point-of-care (POC) testing of coagulation to guide blood product resuscitation during PPH. The project was rolled out to all 12 obstetric units in 2017. The interventions were reinforced by an All Wales Guideline, PPH proforma and standardised training. A national database, biannual audits, and patient and staff surveys reported process and outcome measures.

RESULTS

Process measures: during 2017, there was an increase in the percentage of maternities with documented risk assessment (0%-76%), objective measurement of blood loss (52%-88%) and POC testing for coagulation for PPH ≥1500 mL (38%-59%). Maternity staff survey indicated that 94% were aware of the project and 87% stated that it had changed their unit's management of PPH. Interim outcome measures: the incidence (95% CI) of PPH ≥2500 mL per 1000 maternities in 2017 was 6.03 (5.23-6.95). The annual number of women receiving any red blood cell transfusion, level 3 intensive care admission and hysterectomy for PPH was 19.7 (18.2 to 21.3), 0.702 (0.464 to 1.06) and 0.255 (0.129 to 0.504) per 1000 maternities, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A high level of project awareness across Welsh maternity units has been achieved. Measurement of blood loss was reported to be the most important early change in practice, while PPH documentation and POC testing continue to be embedded. Combining qualitative and quantitative measures to inform implementation has improved project delivery and allowed teams to adapt to local contexts.

Association of Timing of Plasma Transfusion With Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women With Persistent Postpartum Hemorrhage

IMPORTANCE

Early plasma transfusion for women with severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recommended to prevent coagulopathy. However, there is no comparative, quantitative evidence on the association of early plasma transfusion with maternal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of adverse maternal outcomes among women who received plasma during the first 60 minutes of persistent PPH vs women who did not receive plasma for similarly severe persistent PPH.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter cohort study used a consecutive sample of women with persistent PPH, defined as PPH refractory to first-line measures to control bleeding, between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2013. Time-dependent propensity score matching was used to select women who received plasma during the first 60 minutes of persistent PPH and match each of them with a woman who had shown the same severity and received the same treatment of PPH but who had not received plasma at the moment of matching. Transfusions were not guided by coagulation tests. Statistical analysis was performed from June 2018 to June 2019.

EXPOSURES

Transfusion of plasma during the first 60 minutes of persistent PPH vs no or later plasma transfusion.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence of adverse maternal outcomes, defined as a composite of death, hysterectomy, or arterial embolization.

RESULTS

This study included 1216 women (mean [SD] age, 31.6 [5.0] years) with persistent PPH, of whom 932 (76.6%) delivered vaginally and 780 (64.1%) had PPH caused by uterine atony. Seven women (0.6%) died because of PPH, 62 women (5.1%) had a hysterectomy, and 159 women (13.1%) had arterial embolizations. Among women who received plasma during the first 60 minutes of persistent PPH, 114 women could be matched with a comparable woman who had not received plasma at the moment of matching. The incidence of adverse maternal outcomes was similar between the women, with adverse outcomes recorded in 24 women (21.2%) who received early plasma transfusion and 23 women (19.9%) who did not receive early plasma transfusion (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.57-2.09). Results of sensitivity analyses were comparable to the primary results.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, initiation of plasma transfusion during the first 60 minutes of persistent PPH was not associated with adverse maternal outcomes compared with no or later plasma transfusion, independent of severity of PPH.

The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care viscoelastic method and enables to assess viscoelastic profiles of whole blood in various clinical settings. ROTEM-guided bleeding management has become an essential part of patient blood management (PBM) which is an important concept in improving patient safety. Here, ROTEM testing and hemostatic interventions should be linked by evidence-based, setting-specific algorithms adapted to the specific patient population of the hospitals and the local availability of hemostatic interventions. Accordingly, ROTEM-guided algorithms implement the concept of personalized or precision medicine in perioperative bleeding management (‘theranostic’ approach). ROTEM-guided PBM has been shown to be effective in reducing bleeding, transfusion requirements, complication rates, and health care costs. Accordingly, several randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and health technology assessments provided evidence that using ROTEM-guided algorithms in bleeding patients resulted in improved patient’s safety and outcomes including perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the implementation of ROTEM in the PBM concept requires adequate technical and interpretation training, education and logistics, as well as interdisciplinary communication and collaboration.

Retrospective study to investigate fresh frozen plasma and packed cell ratios when administered for women with postpartum hemorrhage, before and after introduction of a massive transfusion protocol

BACKGROUND

Administration of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to women with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) before and after introduction of a massive transfusion protocol.

METHODS

The retrospective PPH study cohort of two tertiary centers was identified using blood bank records, verified by patient electronic medical records. We identified women transfused with ≥3 units PRBC in a short time period within 24 hours of delivery. Since 2010, both centers have used a protocol using 1:1 FFP:PRBC ratios. Demographic, obstetric, and blood management data were retrieved from medical records. Outcome measures included estimated blood loss, blood product administration, and hematologic variables.

RESULTS

273 women were included, 112 (41.0%) prior to introduction of the protocol (2004-2009) and 161 (59.0%) afterwards (2010-2014). The frequency of women managed with 1:1 FFP:PRBC ratios was similar before 55/112 (49.1%) and after 83/161 (51.6%) introduction of the protocol (P=0.69). There was strong correlation between PRBC units transfused and the FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio (R-square 0.866, P <0.0001), demonstrating that as the number of transfused PRBC units increased, FFP:PRBC ratios became closer to 1:1. There were no outcome differences between women managed before and after introduction of the protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with PPH receiving ≥3 PRBC units within a short period of time, it appears that factors other than the existence of our massive transfusion protocol influence the number and ratio of PRBC and FFP units transfused. Blood products were not transfused according to exact ratios, even when guided by a protocol.