Centralized repeated resectability assessment of patients with colorectal liver metastases during first-line treatment: prospective study

Recipient prioritization and graft choice in liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer has been shown to be efficacious in the well selected patient. In the United States, there remains controversy on the appropriate selection criteria and optimal graft type to be utilized in these patients. Our group advocates for strict recipient selection and early access to quality grafts for these recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past two years, there has been an explosion of centers reporting outcomes after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. In North America, the publications have focused on single center experiences. The group in Oslo has reported their long-term outcomes of all transplanted patients. The TransMet randomized controlled trial has demonstrated efficacy of liver transplantation with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone.

SUMMARY

Liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer is an efficacious procedure for the well selected patient. Regardless of graft type, potential liver transplant recipients with liver limited unresectable colorectal liver metastases should be evaluated with a strict criterion to determine eligibility. Once eligible, patients should receive early access to high quality grafts.

Budget Impact of Shifting the Treatment Setting of Unresectable Liver Metastases Associated with Primary Colorectal Cancer Using Y-90 Resin Microspheres from the Outpatient Hospital to the Office-Based Laboratory

Purpose

In the wake of ever-increasing health care costs, solutions are sought to make health care more affordable, such as moving hospital outpatient procedures to office-based laboratory (OBL) settings. A budget impact model was constructed to estimate the health plan cost benefit of moving 50% of yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) procedures for unresectable liver metastases associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) from a traditional hospital outpatient setting (HOPPS) to an OBL setting.

Methods

The eligible population was estimated using an incidence-based approach for a hypothetical health plan with 1 million covered lives. Modeled costs were based on 2024 Medicare reimbursement rates. Three treatment scenarios were considered: 1) base case HOPPS, 2) hybrid (HOPPS/OBL), and 3) OBL settings. Budget impacts were estimated as the differences in annual total cost of treatment after switching 50% of Y-90 SIRTs from HOPPS to the hybrid (HOPPS/OBL) or OBL setting. Per-member-per-month (PMPM) budget impacts were also calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the proportions of patients shifting settings and the treatment setting they were shifting into.

Results

Annually, 28 patients were estimated to have metastatic CRC and unresectable liver metastases in a health plan of 1 million members. Average estimated per-patient cost savings would be $8,791 by switching one patient to a hybrid setting and $17,697 for a patient switched to the OBL. Switching 50% of eligible procedures resulted in PMPM cost benefits to the plan of $0.0102 for hybrid setting and $0.0206 for OBL. In sensitivity analyses, annual cost savings for the health plan were affected by both the proportion of patients shifted and the setting they were shifted into.

Conclusion

Shifting a percentage of the treatment of unresectable liver metastases with Y-90 SIRT to the OBL setting results in modest cost benefits for US health plans.

The Rochester Protocol for living donor liver transplantation of unresectable colorectal liver metastasis: A 5-year report on selection, approval, and outcomes

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a treatment option for select patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis. We describe our center's experience of patient selection, insurance approval, and outcomes after LDLT after first referral in March 2019. Of the 206 evaluated patients, 23 underwent LDLT. We found that patients who were referred earlier in their oncologic course were more likely to be eligible for transplantation. After completion of the Rochester Protocol for LDLT eligibility, recipients had a median delay of care of 10 days (IQR, 0-36 days) related to insurance appeal, with 6 patients (30%) having a delay longer than 30 days. LDLT recipients had an overall survival proportion of 100% and 91% at 1 and 3 years and a recurrence-free survival proportion of 100% and 40% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. All donors underwent right hepatectomy, of which only 1 donor had a Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication and readmission. There was no donor mortality. We assert that multidisciplinary care and strict patient selection through the Rochester Protocol were paramount to our center's success. In the appropriately selected patient, LDLT for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis may be justified, and patients should be referred to transplant oncology centers for evaluation.

Resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases by an expert panel: Potential impact on hospitals referring patients for local treatment

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM) eligible for local treatment (resection/ablation) do not always receive this potentially curative treatment due to the lack of clear resectability criteria and expertise in centres not performing liver surgery. We evaluated the potential value of a liver expert panel in daily practice.

METHODS

All patients with CRLM starting with systemic treatment in centres not performing liver surgery between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A panel of liver surgeons retrospectively re-evaluated patients' imaging for resectability before and two-monthly during systemic treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included from 24 hospitals requiring a total of 544 resectability assessments by individual panel surgeons. The panel considered 18 (29 %) patients to have resectable CRLM before starting systemic treatment, which increased to 43 (68 %) after up to three evaluations. Eighteen (29 %) patients considered resectable by the panel at any time received no local treatment of whom 9 (50 %) were not referred to a liver surgeon.

CONCLUSION

In non-liver-surgery centres, over a quarter of patients technically eligible for local treatment of initially unresectable CRLM, sometimes mistakenly categorised as such, did not receive this. This stresses the need for liver expert panels in daily practice to increase local treatment rates.

Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound improved hepatic recurrence-free survival in initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the role of Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) with perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid) in improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

A total of 130 Patients with unresectable CRLM who underwent curative hepatic resection at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Of these 130 enrolled patients, 67 underwent intraoperative ultrasound alone (IOUS group); 63 underwent additional CE-IOUS and IOUS (CE-IOUS group). Normalized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Hepatic recurrence-free survival (HRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

The treatment strategy was altered in 25 patients (25/63, 39.9%) due to the additional use of CE-IOUS. After applying IPTW, the CE-IOUS group exhibited a significantly lower rate of hepatic recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.95; P = 0.032). Subgroup analysis showed that CE-IOUS provided a significant benefit over IOUS in patients with bilobar liver metastases (P = 0.007), or with a number of live tumors < 3 (P = 0.021), or without DLM (P = 0.018), or with extrahepatic metastasis (P = 0.034), or with a minimum of 6 cycles of systemic therapy (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-IOUS is necessary for unresectable CRLM after preoperative chemotherapy, as it enhances detection accuracy and improves the prognosis of unresectable CRLM patients.

The Current State of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Narrative Review

Perioperative chemotherapy has emerged as a critical component in managing resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), aiming to improve long-term survival, although data supporting its use remains controversial. This narrative review explores the current state of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable CRLM, focusing on its role in different oncological risk categories. The review highlights ongoing controversies, such as optimal patient selection and the role of post- versus preoperative treatment in specific scenarios.

Preoperative identification of early extrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A machine learning approach

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) may provide novel insights into data patterns and improve model prediction accuracy. The current study sought to develop and validate an ML model to predict early extra-hepatic recurrence (EEHR) among patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS

Patients with CRLM who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. An eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to estimate the risk of EEHR, defined as extrahepatic recurrence within 12 months after hepatectomy, using clinicopathological factors. The relative importance of factors was determined using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values.

RESULTS

Among 1410 patients undergoing curative-intent resection, 131 (9.3%) patients experienced EEHR. Median OS among patients with and without EEHR was 35.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 29.9-46.7) versus 120.5 months (IQR 97.2-134.0), respectively (p < 0.001). The ML predictive model had c-index values of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.80) in the entire dataset and the validation data set with bootstrapping resamples, respectively. The SHAP algorithm demonstrated that T and N primary tumor categories, as well as tumor burden score were the three most important predictors of EEHR. An easy-to-use risk calculator for EEHR was developed and made available online at: https://junkawashima.shinyapps.io/EEHR/.

CONCLUSIONS

An easy-to-use online calculator was developed using ML to help clinicians predict the chance of EEHR after curative-intent resection for CRLM. This tool may help clinicians in decision-making related to treatment strategies for patients with CRLM.

Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States

Background

While hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of liver transplant (LT) for liver tumors, indications have broadened over the years. Data regarding patient characteristics and outcomes of LT for liver tumors are limited.

Methods

From Jan-2002 to March-2022, 14,406 LT recipients for various liver tumors were identified in United Network for Organ Sharing database. Overall post-transplant survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.

Results

During the study period, indications for LT for various hepatic tumors were HCC (88.5 %), benign tumors (5.1 %), cholangiocarcinoma (3.9 %), angiosarcoma (0.7 %), bile duct cancer (0.7 %), secondary tumors (0.5 %) and others (0.7 %). Compared to non-HCC, LT recipients for HCC were older (median age 61 vs 54 years, P < 0.001), more often male (77% vs 48 %, P < 0.001), more often Hispanic (16% vs 8.0 %), had higher BMI (28.2 vs 25.3, P < 0.001) and higher prevalence of Hepatitis C (53% vs 3.9 %, P < 0.001). Donor characteristics across various groups were similar. One-year survival in LT recipients of HCC was higher (HCC: 91.7% vs. non-HCC: 90.3 %) with adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77-0.99, P = 0.033 in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Compared to HCC, survival outcomes were worse in cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43-2.01, P < 0.001), bile duct cancer (aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12-4.33, P < 0.001), secondary tumors including colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (aHR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.24-2.85, P = 0.003), with best survival in patients with benign tumors (aHR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.46-0.70, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LT is performed for various liver tumors with variable outcomes among these primary indications.

Liver Transplantation for Nonresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM)

Transplantation represents the most radical locoregional therapy through removal of the liver, associated vasculature and locoregional lymph nodes, and replacing it with an allograft. Recent evidence has demonstrated that transplantation for unresectable CRLM is feasible with acceptable post-transplant outcomes in a highly selected cohort of patients. Controversy exists regarding whether transplantation is an appropriate treatment for such patients, due to concerns regarding disease recurrence in the transplanted graft in an immunosuppressed recipient along with utilising a donor liver which are in short supply. Expanding the indications for liver transplantation may also limit access for other patients with end-stage liver disease having ethical implications due to the effect of increasing the waiting list. In this review, we summarise the current evidence for liver transplantation in patients with nonresectable CRLM and highlight unresolved controversies and future directions for this type of treatment.

Exploring tumor heterogeneity in colorectal liver metastases by imaging: Unsupervised machine learning of preoperative CT radiomics features for prognostic stratification

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate tumor heterogeneity of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and stratify the patients into different risk groups of prognoses following liver resection by applying an unsupervised radiomics machine-learning approach to preoperative CT images.

METHODS

This retrospective study retrieved clinical information and CT images of 197 patients with CRLM from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) database. Radiomics features were extracted from a segmented liver lesion identified at the portal venous phase. Those features which showed high stability, non-redundancy, and indicative information were selected. An unsupervised consensus clustering analysis on these features was adopted to identify subgroups of CRLM patients. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and liver-specific DFS were compared between the identified subgroups. Cox regression analysis was applied to evaluate prognostic risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 851 radiomics features were extracted, and 56 robust features were finally selected for unsupervised clustering analysis which identified two distinct subgroups (96 and 101 patients respectively). There were significant differences in the OS, DFS, and liver-specific DFS between the subgroups (all log-rank p < 0.05). The subgroup with worse outcome using the proposed radiomics model was consistently associated with shorter OS, DFS, and liver-specific DFS, with hazard ratios of 1.78 (95 %CI: 1.12-2.83), 1.72 (95 %CI: 1.16-2.54), and 1.59 (95 %CI: 1.10-2.31), respectively. The general performance of this radiomics model outperformed the traditional Clinical Risk Score and Tumor Burden Score in the prognosis prediction after surgery for CRLM.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics features derived from preoperative CT images can reveal the heterogeneity of CRLM and stratify the patients with CRLM into subgroups with significantly different clinical outcomes.

Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: State of the Art

Liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Treatment of CRC liver metastases (CRLM) includes different strategies, prevalently based on the clinical and oncological intent. Valid approaches in liver-limited or liver-prevalent disease include surgery, percutaneous ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation), intra-arterial perfusional techniques (chemo-embolization, radio-embolization) as well as stereotactic radiotherapy. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other biological agents, are the only options for patients with no chance of locoregional approaches. The use of chemotherapy in other settings, such as neoadjuvant, adjuvant or conversion therapy of CRLM, is commonly accepted in the clinical practice, although data from several clinical trials have been mostly inconclusive. The optimal integration of all these strategies, when applicable and clinically indicated, should be ever considered in patients affected by CRLM based on clinical evidence and multidisciplinary experience. Here we revised in detail all the possible therapeutic approaches of CRLM focusing on the current evidences, the studies still in progress and the often contradictory data.

Complete Blood Count Alterations Prior to the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer May Help in the Detection of Synchronous Liver Metastases

Background and Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents 10% of all cancers worldwide with the highest incidence in developed countries; its incidence is also increasing in middle- and low-income countries. Population screening programs facilitate early diagnosis of the disease. When the diagnosis is carried out in advanced stages, approximately 80% of patients with liver metastases (LM) are considered unresectable at the time of diagnosis. In our study, variations in blood counts prior to CRC diagnosis were analyzed to assess whether they could be useful in identifying smaller, more manageable metastases at earlier stages for more effective treatment. Methods: A study was carried out using complete blood counts (CBCs) from CRC patients, obtained from primary health centers and the La Ribera University Hospital within La Ribera Health Department, Valencian Community, Spain, between July 2012 and September 2020. Data from CRC patients who presented synchronous liver metastasis (CRLM) were compared with those with CRC without LM at diagnosis (CRC patients). Results: Our analysis shows that at least 15 months before CRC diagnosis, a progressive alteration was observed in CBC parameters in both groups. A higher incidence of anemia (p < 0.001) was observed among CRLM patients in the three months prior to CRC diagnosis than in CRC patients showing no LM. Conclusions: A statistically significant deterioration of CBC was observed in patients with advanced-stage CRC and synchronous or early LM (CRLM) in the three months prior to diagnosis. The primary goal of incorporating CBC variations into predictive models is to identify individuals who are at a greater risk of developing metastatic colon cancer, leading to early diagnosis. Our research improves these models by highlighting a more pronounced and rapid decline in hemoglobin levels among CRLM patients. Identification of metastases at an earlier stage when they are smaller, more manageable, and more amenable to treatment may be a valuable tool to prevent their further progression.

Intersurgeon Variability in Local Treatment Planning for Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Analysis of the Liver Expert Panel of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

Consensus on resectability criteria for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) is lacking, resulting in differences in therapeutic strategies. This study evaluated variability of resectability assessments and local treatment plans for patients with initially unresectable CRLM by the liver expert panel from the randomised phase III CAIRO5 study.

METHODS

The liver panel, comprising surgeons and radiologists, evaluated resectability by predefined criteria at baseline and 2-monthly thereafter. If surgeons judged CRLM as resectable, detailed local treatment plans were provided. The panel chair determined the conclusion of resectability status and local treatment advice, and forwarded it to local surgeons.

RESULTS

A total of 1149 panel evaluations of 496 patients were included. Intersurgeon disagreement was observed in 50% of evaluations and was lower at baseline than follow-up (36% vs. 60%, p < 0.001). Among surgeons in general, votes for resectable CRLM at baseline and follow-up ranged between 0-12% and 27-62%, and for permanently unresectable CRLM between 3-40% and 6-47%, respectively. Surgeons proposed different local treatment plans in 77% of patients. The most pronounced intersurgeon differences concerned the advice to proceed with hemihepatectomy versus parenchymal-preserving approaches. Eighty-four percent of patients judged by the panel as having resectable CRLM indeed received local treatment. Local surgeons followed the technical plan proposed by the panel in 40% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Considerable variability exists among expert liver surgeons in assessing resectability and local treatment planning of initially unresectable CRLM. This stresses the value of panel-based decisions, and the need for consensus guidelines on resectability criteria and technical approach to prevent unwarranted variability in clinical practice.

Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current state of liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM), and to address future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Norwegian secondary cancer (SECA) I and SECA II studies demonstrated that after LT the 5-year survival of a highly selected group of patients with uCRLM could be as high as 60% and 83%, respectively. After long-term follow-up, the 5- and 10-year survival was shown to be 43% and 26%, respectively. Furthermore, data has accumulated in other countries and a North American study reported a 1.5-year survival of 100%. In addition, steady growth has been demonstrated in the US, with 46 patients transplanted to date and 19 centers enrolling patients for this indication. Lastly, although recurrence is almost universal in patients with a high tumor burden, it has not been an accurate surrogate for survival, reflecting the relatively indolent nature of recurrence after LT.

SUMMARY

Growing evidence has shown that excellent survival and even cure can be achieved in highly selected patients with uCRLM, with survival rates far superior than in patients treated with chemotherapy. The next step is to create national registries to standardize selection criteria and establish the optimal approach and best practices for incorporating LT for uCRLM into the treatment armamentarium.

Transplantation for metastatic liver disease

The liver is a common site of metastases from many cancers, particularly those originating in the gastrointestinal tract. Liver transplantation is an uncommonly used but promising and at times controversial treatment option for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases. Transplantation with meticulous patient selection has been associated with excellent long-term outcomes in individuals with neuroendocrine liver metastases, but questions remain regarding the role of transplantation in those who could also be eligible for hepatectomy, the role of neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments in minimising recurrence, and the optimal timing of the procedure. A prospective pilot study of liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases that reported a 5-year overall survival rate of 60% reinvigorated interest in this area following initially dismal outcomes. This has been followed by larger studies, and prospective trials are ongoing to quantify the potential benefits of liver transplantation over palliative chemotherapy. This review provides a critical summary of currently available knowledge on liver transplantation for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases, and highlights avenues for further study to address gaps in the evidence base.

The role of tumour biological factors in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases following induction systemic treatment: An analysis of the Dutch CAIRO5 trial

BACKGROUND

Large inter-surgeon variability exists in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) following induction systemic therapy. We evaluated the role of tumour biological factors in predicting resectability and (early) recurrence after surgery for initially unresectable CRLM.

METHODS

482 patients with initially unresectable CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial were selected, with two-monthly resectability assessments by a liver expert panel. If no consensus existed among panel surgeons (i.e. same vote for (un)resectability of CRLM), conclusion was based on majority. The association of tumour biological (sidedness, synchronous CRLM, carcinoembryonic antigen and RAS/BRAF^V600E mutation status) and technical anatomical factors with consensus among panel surgeons, secondary resectability and early recurrence (<6 months) without curative-intent repeat local treatment was analysed by uni- and pre-specified multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

After systemic treatment, 240 (50%) patients received complete local treatment of CRLM of which 75 (31%) patients experienced early recurrence without repeat local treatment. Higher number of CRLM (odds ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15]) and age (odds ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 1.00-1.07]) were independently associated with early recurrence without repeat local treatment. In 138 (52%) patients, no consensus among panel surgeons was present prior to local treatment. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without consensus were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a third of patients selected by an expert panel for secondary CRLM surgery following induction systemic treatment experience an early recurrence only amenable to palliative treatment. Number of CRLM and age, but no tumour biological factors are predictive, suggesting that until there are better biomarkers; resectability assessment remains primarily a technical anatomical decision.

The Resection Rate of Synchronously Detected Liver and Lung Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer Is Low-A National Registry-Based Study

Population-based data on the incidence and surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver and lung metastases are lacking as are real-life data on the frequency of metastasectomy for both sites and outcomes in this setting. This is a nationwide population-based study of all patients having liver and lung metastases diagnosed within 6 months of CRC between 2008 and 2016 in Sweden identified through the merging of data from the National Quality Registries on CRC, liver and thoracic surgery and the National Patient Registry. Among 60,734 patients diagnosed with CRC, 1923 (3.2%) had synchronous liver and lung metastases, of which 44 patients had complete metastasectomy. Surgery of liver and lung metastases yielded a 5-year OS of 74% (95% CI 57-85%) compared to 29% (95% CI 19-40%) if liver metastases were resected but not the lung metastases and 2.6% (95% CI 1.5-4%) if non-resected, p < 0.001. Complete resection rates ranged from 0.7% to 3.8% between the six healthcare regions of Sweden, p = 0.007. Synchronous liver and lung CRC metastases are rare, and a minority undergo the resection of both metastatic sites but with excellent survival. The reasons for differences in regional treatment approaches and the potential of increased resection rates should be studied further.

Predicting early extrahepatic recurrence after local treatment of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Patients who develop early extrahepatic recurrence (EHR) may not benefit from local treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study aimed to develop a prediction model for early EHR after local treatment of CRLMs using a national data set.

METHODS

A Cox regression prediction model for EHR was developed and validated internally using data on patients who had local treatment for CRLMs with curative intent. Performance assessment included calibration, discrimination, net benefit, and generalizability by internal-external cross-validation. The prognostic relevance of early EHR (within 6 months) was evaluated by landmark analysis.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 35 months, 557 of the 1077 patients had EHR and 249 died. Median overall survival was 19.5 (95 per cent c.i. 15.6 to 23.0) months in patients with early EHR after CRLM treatment, compared with not reached (45.3 months to not reached) in patients without an early EHR. The EHR prediction model included side and stage of the primary tumour, RAS/BRAFV600E mutational status, and number and size of CRLMs. The range of 6-month EHR predictions was 5.9-56.0 (i.q.r. 12.9-22.0) per cent. The model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination. The C-index through 6 and 12 months was 0.663 (95 per cent c.i. 0.624 to 0.702) and 0.661 (0.632 to 0.689) respectively. The observed 6-month EHR risk was 6.5 per cent for patients in the lowest quartile of predicted risk compared with 32.0 per cent in the highest quartile.

CONCLUSION

Early EHR after local treatment of CRLMs can be predicted.

Sex differences in metastatic surgery following diagnosis of synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer

The aim was to investigate gender differences in the likelihood to receive metastatic surgery, and to compare overall survival between men and women, among patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a population-based setting. All Swedish adult patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC in 2007-2016 were identified using the nationwide colorectal cancer database (CRCBaSe). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression, comparing the odds of receiving treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival proportions and Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of all-cause mortality rates. All multivariable models were adjusted for age, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index, year of diagnosis, location of primary tumor and single or multiple metastatic locations. A total of 12 201 patients met the study criteria. Women received 23% less metastatic surgery for mCRC (adjusted OR = 0.77, CI:0.69-0.86) and experienced a slightly higher mortality following diagnosis (adjusted HR = 1.09, CI:1.05-1.14). In analyses restricted to patients who received metastatic surgery, no significant differences in mortality were found. In conclusion, this population-based study showed that women less often received metastatic surgery of mCRC and experienced slightly higher all-cause mortality compared with men. The differences persisted despite adjustments of patient and cancer characteristics. Gender differences in receiving treatment are unacceptable if the underlying explanation cannot be motivated. Further studies are needed to understand if the differences are based on sex (i.e., biology) or gender (including clinically unmotivated differences in treatment approach).

Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Current Knowledge and Open Issues

More than 40% of patients with colorectal cancer present liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their disease and up to 50% present with unresectable disease. Without surgical interventions, survival for patients treated with systemic therapies alone is dismal. In the past, liver transplantation (LT) for patients with unresectable CRLM failed to show any survival benefit due to poor selection, ineffective chemotherapeutic regimens, unbalanced immunosuppression and high perioperative mortality. Since then and for many years LT for CRLM was abandoned. The turning point occurred in 2013, when the results from the Secondary Cancer (SECA I) pilot study performed at Oslo University were published reporting a 60% 5-year overall survival after LT in patients with unresectable CRLM. These results effectively reignited the interest in LT as a potential therapy for CRLM, and several trials are undergoing. The aims of this article are to give a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on LT for CRLM, discuss the open issues in this rapidly evolving field, and highlight possible ways to address the future of this fascinating therapeutic alternative for selected patients with CRLM.

Survival Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-2)

Introduction: Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-CRLM) was a propensity score matched (PSM) study that reported short-term outcomes of patients with CRLM who met the Milan criteria and underwent either open (OLR), laparoscopic (LLR) or robotic liver resection (RLR). This study, designated as SIMMILR-2, reports the long-term outcomes from that initial study, now referred to as SIMMILR-1. Methods: Data regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic (NC) and neoadjuvant biological (NB) treatments received were collected, and Kaplan−Meier curves reporting the 5-year overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for OLR, LLR and RLR were created for patients who presented with synchronous lesions only, as there was insufficient follow-up for patients with metachronous lesions. Results: A total of 73% of patients received NC and 38% received NB in the OLR group compared to 70% and 28% in the LLR group, respectively (p = 0.5 and p = 0.08). A total of 82% of patients received NC and 40% received NB in the OLR group compared to 86% and 32% in the RLR group, respectively (p > 0.05). A total of 71% of patients received NC and 53% received NB in the LLR group compared to 71% and 47% in the RLR group, respectively (p > 0.05). OS at 5 years was 34.8% after OLR compared to 37.1% after LLR (p = 0.4), 34.3% after OLR compared to 46.9% after RLR (p = 0.4) and 30.3% after LLR compared to 46.9% after RLR (p = 0.9). RFS at 5 years was 12.1% after OLR compared to 20.7% after LLR (p = 0.6), 33.3% after OLR compared to 26.3% after RLR (p = 0.6) and 22.7% after LLR compared to 34.6% after RLR (p = 0.6). Conclusions: When comparing OLR, LLR and RLR, the OS and RFS were all similar after utilization of the Milan criteria and PSM. Biological agents tended to be utilized more in the OLR group when compared to the LLR group, suggesting that highly aggressive tumors are still managed through an open approach.

Hospital factors and metastatic surgery in colorectal cancer patients, a population-based cohort study

Background

Only a limited proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receives metastatic surgery (including local ablative therapy). The aim was to investigate whether hospital volume and hospital level were associated with the chance of metastatic surgery.

Methods

This national cohort retrieved from the CRCBaSe linkage included all Swedish adult patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC in 2009–2016. The association between annual hospital volume of incident mCRC patients and the chance of metastatic surgery, and survival, were assessed using logistic regression and Cox regression models, respectively. Hospital level (university/non-university) was evaluated as a secondary exposure in a similar manner. Both uni- and multivariable (adjusted for sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, year of diagnosis, cancer characteristics and socioeconomic factors) models were fitted.

Results

A total of 1,674 (17%) out of 9,968 mCRC patients had metastatic surgery. High hospital volume was not associated with increased odds of metastatic surgery after including hospital level in the model, whereas hospital level was (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.94 (1.68–2.24)). All-cause mortality was lower in university versus non-university hospitals (hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.83 (0.78–0.88)).

Conclusions

Patients with mCRC initially cared for by a university hospital experienced a greater chance to receive metastatic surgery and had superior overall survival. High hospital volume in itself was not associated with a greater chance to receive metastatic surgery nor a greater survival probability. Additional efforts should be imposed to provide more equal care for mCRC patients across Swedish hospitals.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10005-8.

Parenchymsparende Operationen oder anatomische Resektionen bei Lebermetastasen des kolorektalen Karzinoms?

Darmkrebs ist eine der häufigsten Todesursachen in der westlichen Welt. Die Hälfte der Patienten entwickelt kolorektale Lebermetastasen (CRLM), dabei weisen weniger als 30% der Patienten zum Zeitpunkt der Diagnose eine chirurgisch resektable Metastasierung auf. Im Falle einer Resektabilität bietet die klassische anatomische (Major-)Hepatektomie eine hohe R0-Resektionsrate, allerdings bei gleichzeitig erhöhter Morbidität und Mortalität. In den letzten 2 Jahrzehnten wurden die potenziellen Vorteile der parenchymsparenden Hepatektomie (PSH) in Bezug auf die onkologischen Gesamtergebnisse, das Überleben und die Re-Resektion im Falle eines Rezidivs („Salvageability“) nachgewiesen. Der Beitrag fasst die aktuellen Erkenntnisse zur PSH als chirurgische Therapieoption zusammen und diskutiert den aktuellen „state of the art“ in verschiedenen Szenarien.

Survival after liver resection and liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases: a comparative analysis stratified by metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT

BACKGROUND

Many patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) recur with poor survival. Overall survival (OS) following liver transplantation (LT) for CRLM is reported to be about 80% at 5 years. In this study, survival following resection versus transplantation for CRLM in patients with moderate (6-70 cm3) metabolic tumor volume (MTV) from the preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) was compared.

METHODS

Disease-free survival (DFS), OS and post recurrence survival (PRS) following resection (n = 18) and LT (n = 12) was compared by using the Kaplan Meier method and log rank test for patients with moderate MTV.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing LT had unresectable metastases, significantly lower age, higher tumor burden score and number of liver metastases, longer time from diagnosis to surgery, and more patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OS at 5 years was 39% in the resection group and 83% in the LT group (P = 0.012). PRS was significantly improved in patients treated with LT compared to resection with 71% alive at 5 years from recurrence compared to 17% in the resection group (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

LT for selected patients seems to be superior to resection as treatment for CRLM for patients with moderate MTV.

Resectability, conversion, metastasectomy and outcome according to RAS and BRAF status for metastatic colorectal cancer in the prospective RAXO study

Background

Outcomes after metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) vary with RAS and BRAF mutational status, but their effects on resectability and conversion rates have not been extensively studied.

Methods

This substudy of the prospective RAXO trial included 906 patients recruited between 2011 and 2018. We evaluated repeated centralised resectability assessment, conversion/resection rates and overall survival (OS), according to RAS and BRAF status.

Results

Patients included 289 with RAS and BRAF wild-type (RAS and BRAFwt), 529 with RAS mutated (RASmt) and 88 with BRAF mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC. Metastatic prevalence varied between the RAS and BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAFmt groups, for liver (78%/74%/61%), lung (24%/35%/28%) and peritoneal (15%/15%/32%) metastases, respectively. Upfront resectability (32%/29%/15%), conversion (16%/13%/7%) and resection/local ablative therapy (LAT) rates (45%/37%/17%) varied for RASa and BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAFmt, respectively. Median OS for patients treated with resection/LAT (n = 342) was 83/69/30 months, with 5-year OS-rates of 67%/60%/24%, while systemic therapy-only patients (n = 564) had OS of 29/21/15 months with 5-year OS-rates of 11%/6%/2% in RAS and BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAFmt, respectively. Resection/LAT was associated with improved OS in all subgroups.

Conclusions

There were significant differences in resectability, conversion and resection/LAT rates according to RAS and BRAF status. OS was also significantly longer for RAS and BRAFwt versus either mutant. Patients only receiving systemic therapy had poorer long-term survival, with variation according to molecular status.

Clinical trial registration

NCT01531621/EudraCT2011-003158-24

KRAS-G12C Mutation in One Real-Life and Three Population-Based Nordic Cohorts of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background

KRAS mutations, present in over 40% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), are negative predictive factors for anti-EGFR therapy. Mutations in KRAS-G12C have a cysteine residue for which drugs have been developed. Published data on this specific mutation are conflicting; thus, we studied the frequency and clinical characteristics in a real-world and population-based setting.

Methods

Patients from three Nordic population-based cohorts and the real-life RAXO-study were combined. RAS and BRAF tests were performed in routine healthcare, except for one cohort. The dataset consisted of 2,559 patients, of which 1,871 could be accurately classified as KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E. Demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan–Meier, and differences were compared using Cox regression, adjusted for baseline factors.

Results

The KRAS-G12C frequency was 2%–4% of all tested in the seven cohorts (mean 3%) and 4%–8% of KRAS mutated tumors in the cohorts (mean 7%). Metastasectomies and ablations were performed more often (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.040), and bevacizumab was added more often (any line 74% vs. 59%, p = 0.007) for patients with KRAS-G12C- vs. other KRAS-mutated tumors, whereas chemotherapy was given to similar proportions. OS did not differ according to KRAS mutation, neither overall (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.74–1.42, reference KRAS-G12C) nor within treatment groups defined as “systemic chemotherapy, alone or with biologics”, “metastasectomy and/or ablations”, or “best supportive care”, RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors (n = 548) differed similarly to KRAS-G12C, as to other KRAS- or NRAS-mutated (n = 66) tumors.

Conclusions

In these real-life and population-based cohorts, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics and outcomes between patients with KRAS-G12C tumors and those with other KRAS mutations. This contrasts with the results of most previous studies claiming differences in many aspects, often with worse outcomes for those with a KRAS-G12C mutation, although not consistent. When specific drugs are developed, as for this mutation, differences in outcome will hopefully emerge.

Metastatic Rectal Carcinoma with Long-Term Remission due to Modern Multimodality Treatment

In the era of personalized medicine, systemic treatment with chemotherapy in combination with targeted drugs, tailored according to RAS and BRAF status, has improved the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but curative resection of metastases provides the only chance of cure. Here, we present a 40-year-old male with rectal adenocarcinoma and multiple bilateral synchronous liver metastases who has achieved long-term remission with multimodal treatment without resection of all metastatic lesions. This case emphasizes the need of repeated multidisciplinary team assessments and change of treatment intent if extraordinary responses are seen. The initial therapy consisted of short-course radiotherapy and surgery of the primary tumor followed by oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy and panitumumab with disease control intent. A complete radiologic response in >20 liver metastases in segments II–VIII was obtained. A biopsy-verified relapse of 3 liver metastases occurred at 9 months of treatment pause. Subsequently, major liver resection of 8 lesions was performed (4 with adenocarcinoma and 4 with cicatrix showing the challenge of disappearing lesions), followed by 6 months of adjuvant-like therapy. No relapse in MRI, PET, or CT has been noted since liver resection 6 years ago. Comprehensive genomic profiling of the primary tumor and liver metastases had similar driver mutations representing a low level of gene alteration and low diversity, possibly explaining the exceptional treatment response.

Association between Altered Oncogenic Signaling Pathways and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Systemic characterization of genomic alterations into signaling pathways helps to understand the molecular pathogenies of colorectal cancer; however, their clinical implications remain unclear. Here, 128 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving targeted next generation sequencing were retrospectively enrolled to analyze the impact of altered oncogenic pathways on clinical outcome. The datasets from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were used for validation. In 123 patients with non-MSI-high tumor, the most common mutated gene was TP53 (84.6%), followed by APC (78.0%), KRAS (49.6%), and SMAD4 (22.8%). When mutated genes were allocated into signaling pathways defined as The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer Analysis Project, alterations of cell cycle, Wnt, p53, RTK-RAS, PI3K, TGF-β, Notch, and Myc pathways were identified in 88%, 87%, 85%, 75%, 28%, 26%, 17%, and 10% of mCRC tissues, respectively. The survival analyses revealed that Myc and TGF-β pathway alterations were associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.412; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.139–5.109; p = 0.018 and HR: 2.754; 95% CI: 1.044–7.265; p = 0.033, respectively). The negative prognostic impact of altered TGF-β pathway was maintained in patients receiving an anti-EGFR antibody. The OS of patients with mCRC carrying MYC and BRAF mutation was shorter than those with either MYC or BRAF mutation (HR: 4.981, 95% CI: 0.296–83.92; p = 0.02). These findings have clinical implications, such as prognosis prediction, treatment guidance, and molecular-targeted therapy development.

Liver transplantation for advanced liver-only colorectal metastases

Liver transplantation provided a 5-year overall survival rate of 100 per cent in patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone liver resection previously. Patients with extensive liver metastases (over 20 lesions) and a left-sided primary tumour had long survival, whereas those with an ascending colonic primary tumour had inferior survival after liver transplantation.

Treatment response of colorectal cancer liver metastases to neoadjuvant or conversion therapy: a prospective multicentre follow-up study using MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging and 1H-MR spectroscopy compared with histology (subgroup in the RAXO trial)

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer liver metastases respond to chemotherapy and targeted agents not only by shrinking, but also by morphologic and metabolic changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods in predicting treatment response and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated contrast-enhanced MRI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in diffusion-weighted imaging and 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in detecting early morphologic and metabolic changes in borderline or resectable liver metastases, as a response to first-line neoadjuvant or conversion therapy in a prospective substudy of the RAXO trial (NCT01531621, EudraCT2011-003158-24). MRI findings were compared with histology of resected liver metastases and Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In 2012-2018, 52 patients at four Finnish university hospitals were recruited. Forty-seven patients received neoadjuvant or conversion chemotherapy and 40 liver resections were carried out. Low ADC values (below median) of the representative liver metastases, at baseline and after systemic therapy, were associated with partial response according to RECIST criteria, but not with morphologic MRI changes or histology. Decreasing ADC values following systemic therapy were associated with improved OS compared to unchanged or increasing ADC, both in the liver resected subgroup (5-year OS rate 100% and 34%, respectively, P = 0.022) and systemic therapy subgroup (5-year OS rate 62% and 23%, P = 0.049). 1H-MRS revealed steatohepatosis induced by systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Low ADC values at baseline or during systemic therapy were associated with treatment response by RECIST but not with histology, morphologic or detectable metabolic changes. A decreasing ADC during systemic therapy is associated with improved OS both in all patients receiving systemic therapy and in the resected subgroup.