Omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection after detection of sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer: first results from the prospective SENOMIC trial

Effect of post-mastectomy radiation therapy on survival in breast cancer with lymph nodes micrometastases: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Axillary management of patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) has evolved, especially with the implementation of precision radiotherapy techniques that have resulted in a significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities, but it is unclear whether post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) improves survival outcomes in breast cancer with lymph nodes micrometastases (BCLNMM, that is T0, T1 ~2NmiM0). Our study is to systematically evaluate the effect of PMRT on survival in breast cancer with lymph nodes micrometastases.

Methods

A literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective studies related to PMRT versus non-post-mastectomy radiotherapy (non-PMRT) in the adjuvant treatment of ESBC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI and other databases. R package meta software was used to perform meta-analyses with hazard ratio (HR). Newcastle Ottawa scale was selected for quality assessment. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024562444).

Results

10 relevant studies were screened, all of which were retrospective studies. The difference in overall survival (OS) was not statistically significant (HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.81 ~ 1.04; Z = 1.35, P = 0.177). The difference in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the PMRT group and the non-PMRT group was not statistically significant HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 0.94 ~ 1.48; Z = 1.41, P =0.160). The difference in disease-free survival (DFS) was statistically significant (HR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.23 ~ 1.00; Z = 1.96, P =0.049). The difference in local recurrence free survival (LRRFS) was also not statistically significant (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.11 ~ 2.26, P = 0.190). The difference in distant-metastasis free survival (DMFS) was not statistically significant (HR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.22 ~ 1.35, P = 0.356).

Conclusions

Despite the tendency of PMRT in BCLNMM to improve DFS, OS, BCSS, LRRFS, and DMFS showed no benefit, therefore, PMRT should be used with caution in BCLNMM.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024562444.

Mapping the current landscape of locoregional therapy de-escalation trials in early breast cancer: a systematic review

A systematic review undertaken to map the current landscape of locoregional de-escalation trials to inform future research. Online databases and trial registries were searched to identify ongoing, recently completed or published studies de-escalating surgery or radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. 97 trials evaluated de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy in up to 94,866 participants. Surgery studies more commonly evaluated treatment omission/reduction after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and de-escalation of nodal treatment. Radiotherapy studies were more frequently biomarker stratified. Patients were rarely involved in study design. Research questions focused on response-adjusted treatment after NST and omission/reduction of locoregional therapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk disease. Significant duplication was identified with multiple studies addressing similar questions. This systematic review demonstrates that the current de-escalation portfolio is inefficient, lacks patient focus and needs improvement. An internationally collaborative approach using innovative study designs and patient partnership will be essential to address this.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria: Regional Nodal Irradiation for Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Recent literature has provided additional data to further individualize treatment recommendations on regional nodal irradiation (RNI) patient selection and delivery techniques, but controversies surrounding optimal RNI utilization remain, including radiation technique, modality selection, and internal mammary lymph node (IMN) inclusion. The American Radium Society (ARS) Breast Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Committee performed a systematic review and developed a consensus guideline to summarize recent data and provide evidence-based recommendations.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel comprised of 15 members representing radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and surgical oncologists specializing in the treatment of breast cancer conducted an analysis of the medical literature from January 1, 2011 to April 1, 2024. Modified Delphi methodology was used to rate the appropriateness of treatments for variants across 3 key questions.

RESULTS

Patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer, such as limited nodal involvement or large primary tumor size, are reasonable candidates for RNI, although a subset of patients with overall favorable clinicopathologic features may be considered for treatment de-escalation. Data on the use of advanced radiation techniques for RNI were limited in scope and strength, and the panel agreed that careful patient selection is needed when using these tools. Evidence suggests that the IMN should be included when delivering RNI given the absolute benefit demonstrated in multiple randomized trials.

CONCLUSION

A systematic review and evidence-based summary of recommendations are provided in these consensus guidelines from the ARS Breast AUC Committee to provide current comprehensive guidance on the optimal management of non-metastatic breast cancer patients being considered for RNI.

Accuracy and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Male with Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in breast cancer, offering reduced morbidity and comparable accuracy. However, the application of SLNB in MBC remains underexplored, with limited male-specific data and treatment protocols often extrapolated from female breast cancer studies. Available evidence suggests that SLNB in men demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy, with low false-negative rates and a high sentinel lymph node identification rate. Despite this, there is ongoing debate about its long-term impact on clinical outcomes, particularly for patients with sentinel node metastasis, where ALND may still provide superior survival outcomes in some cases. Predictive tools are being developed to identify better patients who may benefit from SLNB alone, potentially reducing the need for more invasive procedures. As the role of SLNB continues to evolve in MBC management, further prospective research is needed to refine its application and assess its long-term oncologic outcomes.

The prevalence of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis among breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement and its impact on clinical decision-making: a single-centred retrospective study

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become standard procedure for early breast cancer patients with clinically node negative disease. The patients with SLN metastasis normally underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the metastatic status of non-sentinel Lymph nodes (non-SLNs) varied significantly in different reports. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of non-SLNs metastasis among breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis and its impact on clinical decision-making.

Materials and Methods

We identified 892 female patients with operable cT1-3N0 invasive breast cancer who underwent ALND in our center due to SLN metastasis from 2017 to 2023, retrospectively. The prevalence of non-SLN metastasis among different clinicopathological traits and its correlation with the number of positive SLNs were analyzed. The optimal clinical decision-making was generalized.

Results

The median number of SLN+, SLN, non-SLN+ and non-SLN was 2, 4, 1 and 14 among the enrolled 892 female patients, respectively. 504 (56.50%) patients with SLN + had at least one metastatic lymph node in the harvested non-SLNs. Among the enrolled 892 female patients, 435 (48.77%) patients with 1 positive SLN, of which 180 (41.38%) had at least one additional metastatic non-SLNs. 242 (27.13%) patients with 2 positive SLNs, of which 146 (60.33%) had at least one metastatic non-SLNs. For the rest 215 (24.10%) patients with at least 3 metastatic SLNs, 178 (82.79%) had at least one metastatic non-SLNs. In the univariate analysis, the non-SLNs metastatic status was correlated with the number of SLNs+, tumor size, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and molecular subtypes, but not histopathologic type. In the multivariate analysis, the risk of additional non-SLNs metastasis correlated with the number of SLNs+, SLNs, non-SLNs and LVI.

Conclusion

Omiting ALND in patients with higher non-SLNs + rate outside the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACSOG) Z0011 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 10,981-22023 AMAROS criteria should be considered with caution in clinical decision-making. To evaluate whether axillary radiotherapy and ALND provides equivalent regional control in breast cancer patients with obvious residual metastatic lymph nodes undesected in the axilla, a well-matched prospective randomized controlled trial is an urgent need.

Prognostic role of lymph node micrometastasis in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

An estimated 20% of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) have micrometastases (Mi) or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the cervical lymph nodes that evade detection by standard histological evaluation of lymph node sections. Lymph node Mi and ITC could be one reason for regional recurrence after neck dissection. The aim of this study was to review the existing data regarding the impact of Mi on the survival of patients with OOSCC.

METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles reporting the impact of Mi and ITC on patient survival. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of retrieved studies using the Downs and Black index. Data were also extracted on study type, number of included patients, mode of histological analysis, statistical analysis, and prognostic impact.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles with a total of 2064 patients were included in the review. Among the 16 included studies, eight revealed a statistically significant impact of Mi on at least one endpoint in the Kaplan-Meier and/or multivariate analysis. Three studies regarded Mi as Ma, while five studies found no impact of Mi on survival. Only one study demonstrated an impact of ITC on patient's prognosis in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The majority of cases included in the review were patients with oral cancer. The findings provide low-certainty evidence that Mi negatively impacts survival. Data on ITC were scarcer, so no conclusions can be drawn about their effect on survival. The lower threshold to discriminate between Mi and ITC should be defined for OOSCC since the existing thresholds are based on data from different tumors. The histological, immunohistological, and anatomical characteristics of Mi and ITC in OOSCC as well as the effect of radiotherapy on Mi should be further investigated separately for oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with micrometastatic disease in sentinel node dissection: A cohort study and meta-analysis

Aim

The potential role of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) on prognosis in patients with T1-2 breast cancer and micrometastatic disease in sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of PMRT on prognosis in patients with T1-2 breast cancer and micrometastatic in SLND.

Method

A register- and population-based cohort was utilized by identifying eligible patients on the research database BcBase 3.0. Multivariate Cox regression models were applied for survival outcomes. In addition, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis including all relevant studies on this topic was performed.

Results

In total, 956 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were found through the BcBaSe 3.0 with 237 (25.0 %) receiving PMRT and 719 (75.0 %) not receiving PMRT. No statistically significant differences between the two patient groups in terms of neither breast cancer-specific (adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.49; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 0.14 - 1.73) nor overall survival (adjusted HR: 0.63; 95 % CI: 0.29 - 1.35) was found. In the pooled analyses after literature review, PMRT did not result in better breast cancer-specific (5 studies; pooled HR: 1.06; 95 % CI: 0.88-1.27; I2 = 1 %; low certainty of evidence) or overall survival (6 studies; pooled HR: 1.01; 95 % CI: 0.91-1.13; I2 = 10 %; low certainty of evidence).

Conclusion

PMRT does not seem to impact survival in patients with T1 or T2 breast cancer with micrometastatic disease in SLND. Considering the low level of evidence and the relatively short follow-up of included studies, caution in interpreting the results into clinical practice is suggested.

Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Lymph node micrometastasis is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, but patients with different numbers of involved lymph nodes are all divided into the same N1mi stage without distinction. We designed this study to compare the prognosis and local treatment recommendations of N1mi breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 27,032 breast cancer patients with T1-2N1miM0 stage from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2019) who underwent breast surgery were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups for prognosis comparison according to the number of micrometastatic lymph nodes: N1mi with 1 (Nmi = 1), 2 (Nmi = 2), or more (Nmi ≥ 3) involved lymph nodes. We explored the characteristics and survival outcomes of the population receiving different local treatments, including different axillary surgery types and whether receiving radiotherapy or not. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in different groups. Stratified analyses and interaction analyses were also applied to explore the predictive significance of different involved lymph nodes numbers. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was utilized to balance the differences between groups.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that nodal status was an independent prognostic factor. After adjustment for other prognostic factors, there was a significant difference in prognosis between Nmi = 1 group and Nmi = 2 group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.145, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047-1.251, P = 0.003], and patients with Nmi ≥ 3 group had a significantly poorer prognosis (adjusted HR 1.679, 95% CI 1.589-2.407; P < 0.001). The proportion of N1mi patients only underwent sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) gradually increased from 2010 (P_trend < 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, N1mi patients who underwent axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) was associated with significant survival benefit than SLNB (adjusted HR 0.932, 95%CI 0.874-0.994; P = 0.033), the same goes for receiving radiotherapy (adjusted HR 1.107, 95%CI 1.030-1.190; P = 0.006). Further stratified analysis showed that in the SLNB subgroup, radiotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 1.695, 95%CI 1.534-1.874; P < 0.001), whereas in the ALND subgroup, there was no significant prognostic difference with or without radiotherapy (HR 1.029, 95%CI 0.933-1.136; P = 0.564).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the increasing number of lymph node micrometastases was associated a worse prognosis of N1mi breast cancer patients. In addition, ALND does provide a significant survival benefit for these patients, while the benefit from local radiotherapy may be of even greater importance.

The extent of agreement between frozen and paraffin block data from axillary samples in patients with early-stage breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with early-stage breast cancer currently undergo sentinel lymph node dissection to evaluate the axillary region. Frozen tissue blocks are evaluated intra operatively and paraffin-embedded samples are studied postoperatively. We explored whether sentinel lymph node dissection adequately reflected axillary involvement (as revealed by the paraffin blocks) in patients with early-stage breast cancer; we sought to avoid axillary dissection.

METHODS

The agreement/non-agreement rates between the results of axillary ultrasonography and biopsy, sentinel lymph node and axillary dissections, and frozen and paraffin block results, were retrospectively analyzed for 200 patients with early-stage breast cancer. The positive predictive values and accuracies were recorded in those who were positive on both ultrasonography and biopsy. The negative predictive values were calculated for doubly negative cases.

RESULTS

The frozen and paraffin block results disagreed in 19 (9.5 %) cases and agreed in 181 (90.5 %). The frozen block and dissection results differed in five of 38 patients who underwent axillary dissection (AD) (one patient did not undergo AD); the results were in agreement in 32. Of the 19 block-disagreement cases, 16 were in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and three in the NAC treatment group. Clinically, the negative predictive values of the frozen and paraffin block data were 80 % in patients lacking axillary involvement.

CONCLUSION

Paraffin block evaluations only (thus, without frozen block examinations) of early-stage breast cancer lymph nodes seem to be sufficient to guide treatment. Also, a thorough clinical examination (with ultrasonography and axillary biopsy) reduces the dissection rate and the associated functional impairments.

Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer

This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.

Evaluation of adjuvant therapy for T1-2N1miM0 breast cancer without further axillary lymph node dissection

Background

For breast cancer (BC) with sentinel lymph node micrometastases (SLNMs), there are limited data to guide the selection of postoperative adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to identify target populations who might benefit most from adjuvant therapy and examine prognostic factors among patients with T1-2N1miM0 BC with one or two SLNMs who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone.

Methods

There were 7,423 patients diagnosed with T1-2N1miM0 BC between 2010 and 2015, and patients with one or two SLNMs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. All the patients underwent SLNB alone without further axillary lymph node dissection, and they were stratified according to adjuvant therapy. The statistical significance of categorical variables was analyzed using the χ ² test. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were used to analyze characteristics predictive of Breast-cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier methods with the log-rank test was analyzed to compare survival difference between the different treatments.

Results

Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy improved 5-year OS rates. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥70 years, high grade, T2 stage, triple-negative subtype, and absence of radiotherapy were poor prognostic factors for OS. Patients who received breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), luminal A, luminal B, or basal-like subtype, and T1c or T2 stage benefited from adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients who received BCS, and those with IDC, luminal A subtype, and T1b, T1c, or T2 stage benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Our findings provide a clinical evaluation of treatment choice after surgery, which may help clinicians make individualized clinical decisions.