Neoadjuvant therapy versus direct to surgery for T4 colon cancer: meta-analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Subcutaneous Envafolimab in dMMR/MSI-H Locally Advanced Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with programmed death-ligand 1 blockade for colon cancer, especially for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) colon cancer, has gained considerable attention recently.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant subcutaneous envafolimab in patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer treated with envafolimab at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Yunnan Cancer Hospital from October 2021 to July 2023 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (CR) rate, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and complete clinical response rate.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 patients were analyzed. After neoadjuvant immunotherapy with envafolimab, six patients achieved a CR, with five partial responses, and four stable disease. Three patients achieving a complete clinical response chose to accept a "watch and wait" strategy, and surgery was performed in 12 patients. Postoperative pathology results revealed seven patients achieved pathological CRs, and five patients achieved tumor regression grade 2, with 66.7% of the total CR rate. The most common treatment-related adverse events were pruritus and rash (40%), with no severe cases. No recurrences occurred over a 7.9-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Envafolimab yielded promising surgical outcomes and safety in dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer, representing a promising treatment modality for this population.

The ELECLA trial: A multicentre randomised control trial on outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment on locally advanced colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer (CC) is a public health concern with increasing incidence in younger populations. Treatment for locally advanced CC (LACC) involves oncological surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to reduce recurrence and improve overall survival (OS). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a novel approach for the treatment of LACC, and research is underway to explore its potential benefit in terms of survival. This trial will assess the efficacy of NAC in LACC.

METHODS

This is a multicentre randomised, parallel-group, open label controlled clinical trial. Participants will be selected based on homogenous inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two treatment groups: NAC, surgery, and AC or surgery followed by AC. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary outcomes including 5-year PFS, 2- and 5-year OS, toxicity, radiological and pathological response, morbidity, and mortality.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will determine whether NAC induces a clinical and histological tumour response in patients with CCLA and if this treatment sequence improves survival without increasing morbidity and mortality.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04188158.

Developing a RiskScore Model based on Angiogenesis-related lncRNAs for Colon Adenocarcinoma Prognostic Prediction

AIM

We screened key angiogenesis-related lncRNAs based on colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) to construct a RiskScore model for predicting COAD prognosis and help reveal the pathogenesis of the COAD as well as optimize clinical treatment.

BACKGROUND

Regulatory roles of lncRNAs in tumor progression and prognosis have been confirmed, but few studies have probed into the role of angiogenesis-related lncRNAs in COAD.

OBJECTIVE

To identify key angiogenesis-related lncRNAs and build a RiskScore model to predict the survival probability of COAD patients and help optimize clinical treatment.

METHODS

Sample data were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The HALLMARK pathway score in the samples was calculated using the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) method. LncRNAs associated with angiogenesis were filtered by an integrated pipeline algorithm. LncRNA-based subtypes were classified by ConsensusClusterPlus and then compared with other established subtypes. A RiskScore model was created based on univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and stepwise regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve was drawn by applying R package survival. The time-dependent ROC curves were drawn by the timeROC package. Finally, immunotherapy benefits and drug sensitivity were analyzed using tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) software and pRRophetic package.

RESULTS

Pathway analysis showed that the angiogenesis pathway was a risk factor affecting the prognosis of COAD patients. A total of 66 lncRNAs associated with angiogenesis were screened, and three molecular subtypes (S1, S2, S3) were obtained. The prognosis of S1 and S2 was better than that of S3. Compared with the existing subtypes, the S3 subtype was significantly different from the other two subtypes. Immunoassay showed that immune cell scores of the S2 subtype were lower than those of the S1 and S3 subtypes, which also had the highest TIDE scores. We recruited 8 key lncRNAs to develop a RiskScore model. The high RiskScore group with inferior survival and higher TIDE scores was predicted to benefit limitedly from immunotherapy, but it may be more sensitive to chemotherapeutics. A nomogram designed by RiskScore signature and other clinicopathological characteristics shed light on rational predictive power for COAD treatment.

CONCLUSION

We constructed a RiskScore model based on angiogenesis-related lncRNAs, which could serve as potential prognostic predictors for COAD patients and may offer clues for the intervention of anti-angiogenic application. Our results may help evaluate the prognosis of COAD and provide better treatment strategies.

Epidemiology, oncologic results and risk stratification model for metachronous peritoneal metastases after surgery for pT4 colon cancers: results from an observational retrospective multicentre long-term follow-up study

PURPOSE

Metachronous peritoneal metastases (MPM) following a curative surgery procedure for pT4 colon cancer is a challenging condition. Current epidemiological studies on this topic are scarce.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre trial was designed. All consecutive patients who underwent operations to treat pT4 cancers between 2015 and 2017 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, operative, pathological and oncological follow-up variables were included. MPM were described as any oncological disease at the peritoneum, clearly different from a local recurrence. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were constructed. A risk stratification model was created on a cumulative factor basis. According to the calculated hazard ratio (HR), a scoring system was designed (HR < 3, 1 point; HR > 3, 2 points) and a scale from 0 to 6 was calculated for peritoneal disease-free rate (PDF-R). A risk stratification model was also created on the basis of these calculations.

RESULTS

Fifty different hospitals were involved, which included a total of 1356 patients. Incidence of MPM was 13.6% at 50 months median follow-up. The strongest independent risk factors for MPM were positive pN stage [HR 3.72 (95% CI 2.56-5.41; p < 0.01) for stage III disease], tumour perforation [HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.26-2.87; p < 0.01)], mucinous or signet ring cell histology [HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.1-2.58; p = 0.02)], poorly differentiated tumours [HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.1-2.2; p = 0.02)] and emergency surgery [HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.01-2.01; p = 0.049)]. In the absence of additional risk factors, pT4 tumours showed 98% and 96% PDF-R in 1-year and 5-year periods based on Kaplan-Meier curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative MPM incidence was 13.6% at 5-year follow-up. The sole presence of a pT4 tumour resulted in high rates of PDF-R at 1-year and 5-year follow-up (98% and 96% respectively). Five additional risk factors different from pT4 status itself were identified as possible MPM indicators during follow-up.

Tumour deposits in colon cancer predict recurrence and reduced survival in a nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

Tumour deposits are suggested to impact prognosis in colon cancer negatively. This study assessed the impact of tumour deposits on oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for patients who underwent R0 abdominal surgery for TNM stage I-III colon cancer between 2011 and 2014 with 5-year follow-up were analysed with multivariable analysis. Patients were categorized for their tumour deposit status and compared for the local recurrence and distant metastasis rates and 5-year survivals (overall and relative). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the nodal disease status.

RESULTS

Of 8146 stage I-III colon cancer patients who underwent R0 resection, 8014 patients were analysed (808 tumour deposits positive, 7206 tumour deposits negative). Patients with tumour deposits positive tumours had increased local recurrence and distant metastasis rates (7.2 versus 3.0 per cent; P < 0.001 and 33.9 versus 12.0 per cent; P < 0.001 respectively) and reduced 5-year overall and relative survival (56.8 per cent versus 74.9 per cent; P < 0.001 and 68.5 versus 92.6 per cent; P < 0.001 respectively). In multivariable analysis, tumour deposits moderately increased the risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis (hazard ratio 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.09 to 2.07; P = 0.013 and HR 1.91, 95 per cent c.i. 1.64 to 2.23; P < 0.001 respectively) and worse 5-year overall and relative survival (hazard ratio 1.60, 95 per cent c.i. 1.40 to 1.82; P < 0.001 and excess hazard ratio 2.24, 95 per cent c.i. 1.81 to 2.78; P < 0.001 respectively). Subgroup analysis of N stages found that N1c patients had worse outcomes than N0 for distant metastasis and relative survival. For patients with lymph node metastases tumour deposits increased the risks of distant metastasis and worse overall and relative survival, except for N2b patients.

CONCLUSION

Tumour deposits negatively impact the prognosis in colon cancer and must be considered when discussing adjuvant chemotherapy.

The safety of colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on the healthcare systems. This study evaluated the safety of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD 42022327968). Relevant articles were systematically searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative mortality, 30-day readmission, tumor stage, total hospitalization, postoperative hospitalization, preoperative waiting, operation time, and hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) were compared between the pre-pandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic periods.

Results

Among the identified 561 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The data indicated that preoperative waiting time related to CRC surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (MD, 0.99; 95%CI, 0.71-1.28; p < 0.00001). A similar trend was observed for the total operative time (MD, 25.07; 95%CI, 11.14-39.00; p =0.0004), and on T4 tumor stage during the pandemic (OR, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.22-2.59; p=0.003). However, there was no difference in the postoperative complications, postoperative 90-day mortality, anastomotic leakage, and 30-day readmission times between pre-COVID-19 pandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic periods. Furthermore, there was no difference in the total hospitalization time, postoperative hospitalization time, and hospitalization time in ICU related to CRC surgery before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic did not affect the safety of CRC surgery. The operation of CRC during the COVID-19 pandemic did not increase postoperative complications, postoperative 90-day mortality, anastomotic leakage, 30-day readmission, the total hospitalization time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative ICU hospitalization time. However, the operation of CRC during COVID-19 pandemic increased T4 of tumor stage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the preoperative waiting and operation times were longer during the COVID-19 pandemic. This provides a reference for making CRC surgical strategy in the future.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022327968.

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on our resectability criteria for locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not commonly used for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of NAC for PHC.

METHODS

Ninety-one PHC patients without metastases were treated at our department. Patients were classified as resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), or locally advanced unresectable (LA). Upfront surgery (US) was performed for R-PHC patients without regional lymph node metastases (LNM) or those unable to tolerate NAC. The NAC regimen comprised two courses of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced PHC: R-PHC with LNM, BR, and LA.

RESULTS

US and NAC were performed on 32 and 59 patients, respectively. For US, 31 patients underwent curative intent surgery (upfront-CIS). NAC caused adverse effects in 10/59 (17%), allowed 36/59 (61%) to undergo curative intent surgery (NAC-CIS) without impairing liver function, and spared 23/59 (39%) from undergoing resection (NAC-UR). Overall survival was better in the upfront-CIS and NAC-CIS groups than in the NAC-UR group (MST: 74 vs 57 vs 17 months, p < 0.001). In 59 NAC patients, tumour size response occurred in 11/11 (100%) of R, 22/33 (66.7%) of BR, and 9/15 (60.0%) of LA patients. The un-resection rate was the highest in the LA group (27% [3/11] than in R, 30% [10/33] in BR, and 67% [10/15] in LA, p = 0.039). Multivariate analyses revealed that LA and age were independent risk factors for non-resection after NAC.

CONCLUSION

was safe and contributed to improving survival in advanced PHC patients. R-PHC was responsive to NAC, but LA remains a risk factor for non-resection through NAC.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with right hemicolectomy for advanced malignancy: a single UK hepatopancreaticobiliary centre experience

AIM

Locally advanced intestinal neoplasms including colon cancer may require radical en bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy and right hemicolectomy (PD-RC) to achieve curative, margin-negative resection, but the safety and benefit of this uncommon procedure has not been established. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland IMPACT initiative has also highlighted a lack of awareness about current services available within the UK for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and concerns about low-volume centres managing complex cases. Thus, we aimed to review the feasibility, safety and long-term outcomes of this procedure at a single high-volume hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery unit in the UK.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of all consecutive patients with intestinal cancer who had been referred to our regional advanced multidisciplinary team and undergone PD-RC in a 7-year period (2013-2020). Clinico-pathological and outcome data were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ten patients (mean age 54 ± 13, 8/10 men) were identified. Final histology revealed the primary tumour sites were colon (n = 7) and duodenum (n = 3). R0 resection was achieved in all cases. The major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) was 10% (1/10) with no deaths within 90 days of surgery. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year overall survival was 83.3% (95% CI 58.3%-100%). Univariate survival analysis identified perineural invasion and extra-colonic origin as predictors of poor survival (log-rank P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

En bloc PD-RC for locally advanced intestinal cancer can be performed safely with a high proportion of margin-negative resections and resultant long-term survival in carefully selected patients.

Integrating machine learning and single-cell trajectories to analyze T-cell exhaustion to predict prognosis and immunotherapy in colon cancer patients

Introduction

The incidence of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) has recently increased, and patients with advanced COAD have a poor prognosis due to treatment resistance. Combining conventional treatment with targeted therapy and immunotherapy has shown unexpectedly positive results in improving the prognosis of patients with COAD. More study is needed to determine the prognosis for patients with COAD and establish the appropriate course of treatment.

Methods

This study aimed to explore the trajectory of T-cell exhaustion in COAD to predict the overall survival and treatment outcome of COAD patients. Clinical data were derived from the TCGA-COAD cohort through "UCSC", as well as the whole genome data. Prognostic genes driving T-cell trajectory differentiation were identified on the basis of single-cell trajectories and univariate Cox regression. Subsequently, T-cell exhaustion score (TES) was created by iterative LASSO regression. The potential biological logic associated with TES was explored through functional analysis, immune microenvironment assessment, immunotherapy response prediction, and in vitro experiments.

Results

Data showed that patients with significant TES had fewer favorable outcomes. Expression, proliferation, and invasion of COAD cells treated with TXK siRNA were also examined by cellular experiments. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression indicated that TES was an independent prognostic factor in patients with COAD; in addition, subgroup analysis supported this finding. Functional assay revealed that immune response and cytotoxicity pathways are associated with TES, as the subgroup with low TES has an active immune microenvironment. Furthermore, patients with low TES responded better to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Conclusion

In this study, we systematically explored the T-cell exhaustion trajectory in COAD and developed a TES model to assess prognosis and provide guidelines for the treatment decision. This discovery gave rise to a fresh concept for novel therapeutic procedures for the clinical treatment of COAD.

Molecular subtypes identified by pyroptosis-related genes are associated with tumor microenvironment cell infiltration in colon cancer

The important role of pyroptosis in tumor progression has been well characterized in recent years. However, little is known about the impact of tumor pyroptosis characteristics on patient prognosis and tumor microenvironment (TME) as well as efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, we successfully classified colon cancer samples into three pyroptosis characterizations with different prognosis and TME cell infiltration patterns based on the expression of pyroptosis-related genes. Cluster 2, with the characterizations of immunosuppression, was classified as immune-desert cell infiltration patterns. Cluster 3, with the patterns of immune-inflamed cell infiltration, had the feature of an activated innate and adaptive immunity and significant prolonged survival. The activation of stromal pathways including EMT, angiogenesis and TGF-β in cluster 1 may mediate the impaired immune penetration of this cluster, which was classified as immune-excluded cell infiltration patterns. Our results demonstrated the PyroSig signature was a robust and independent biomarker for predicting patient prognosis. Patients with low PyroSig signature was confirmed to be correlated with treatment advantages and significant prolonged survival in two anti-checkpoint immunotherapy cohorts. This study identified three pyroptosis-related subtypes with distinct molecular features, clinical and microenvironment cell infiltration patterns in colon cancer, which could promote individualized immunotherapy for colon cancer.

Prognostic value of final pathological stage in colon adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A propensity score-matched study

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could improve local tumor control of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC), but the prognostic value of yp stage in colon cancer remains unknown. Here, we aimed to ascertain yp stage as an indicator for LACC prognosis after NAC.

Methods

The data of patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. After 1:2 propensity score matching, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the NAC and Non-NAC groups of different stage classifications. The correlation between clinical and pathological factors and CSS was identified.

Results

A total of 49, 149, and 81 matched pairs of stage 0-I, II, and III patients, respectively, were generated for analysis. For stage 0-I (p = 0.011) and III (p = 0.015), only CSS in the NAC groups were inferior. Receiving NAC was an independent prognostic risk factor for patients with stage 0-I (hazard ratio, 7.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.820-32.5; p = 0.006) and stage III (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.68; p = 0.015).

Conclusions

The CSS was poorer among LACC patients who underwent NAC than among those who did not. The yp stage of colon cancer after NAC has distinctive significance, which may contribute to predicting the prognosis and guiding the treatment of LACC patients after NAC.

Protocol: The role of defunctioning stoma prior to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced colonic and rectal cancer-A systematic review

Defunctioning stomas (ileostomy and colostomy) may be used prior to commencement of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced colon or rectal cancer, in order to prevent clinical large bowel obstruction caused by radiotherapy associated oedema or progression of disease in patients who are not obstructed. However, the exact rate of clinical obstruction in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy who do not receive a defunctioning stoma is not known. Furthermore, it is not clear which factors predispose patients to developing clinical large bowel obstruction. Given that defunctioning stomas are associated with post operative and intra-operative risks, it is not currently possible to tailor defunctioning stomas to patients who have the greatest risk of developing obstruction. This systematic review which is in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA), aims to define the role of defunctioning stomas in prevention of obstruction patients with locally advanced colon or rectal cancer while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. Two researchers will perform the literature search which will include all published and “in process” articles published in the English language between 2002–2022 in the following databases: EMBASE (OVID), MEDLINE (EBSCO), CINHAL complete, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Clinical Trials Registry. The full text of the selected articles will be independently screened by two researchers against the inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted from each article regarding: study design, participants, type of intervention and outcomes. The effect size will be expressed in incidence rates and when appropriate in relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. If possible, we will perform a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed using I² statistics. We will pool the data extracted from the randomised controlled trials to perform a meta-analysis using the Review Manager 5 software (RevMan 5). The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system will be used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Neoadjuvant treatment of advanced colonic cancer: a paradigm shift?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an exciting and emerging field for colonic cancer treatment. This article reviews the evidence for such treatment and the role of of molecular testing in treatment selection.

Cell-Free Circulating (Tumor) DNA before Surgery as a Prognostic Factor in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Identification of non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with a high risk of recurrence after tumor resection is important to select patients who might benefit from adjuvant treatment. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses after surgery are promising biomarkers to predict recurrence in these patients. However, these analyses face several challenges and do not allow guidance of neoadjuvant treatment, which might become a novel standard option in colon cancer treatment. The prognostic value of cfDNA/ctDNA before surgery is unclear. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of publications in which the prognostic value of presurgery cfDNA/ctDNA in non-metastatic CRC patients was studied and is performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 29 out of 1233 articles were included and categorized into three groups that reflect the type of approach: measurement of cfDNA, ctDNA somatic alterations, and ctDNA methylation. Overall, a clear association between presurgery cfDNA/ctDNA and the outcome was not observed, but large studies that primarily focus on the prognostic value of presurgery cfDNA/ctDNA are lacking. Designing and performing studies that focus on the value of presurgery cfDNA/ctDNA is needed, in addition to standardization in the reporting of cfDNA/ctDNA results according to existing guidelines to improve comparability and interpretation among studies.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study examined the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenic flexure colon cancer (SFCC) surgery.

METHOD

Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed and Ovid to compare laparoscopic and open colectomy for SFCC. The last search was conducted on November 7, 2021. Surgical and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed. This meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software (v 5.3).

RESULTS

This study included seven publications with 2397 patients published between 2011 and 2021. A significant difference in operative time was seen in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.01, WMD = 50.13, 95%CI [10.32, 89.94], I² = 97%); loss of blood estimated (P < 0.001, WMD =  -101.88, 95%CI [-161.65, -42.11], I² = 82%) and the incidence of overall complications (P < 0.001, OR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.38, 0.75], I² = 0%) of laparoscopic procedure were greatly decreased. There were similar results as compared in the two groups in terms of lymph node harvesting (P = 0.71, WMD = 0.49, 95%CI [-2.13, 3.12], I² = 93%) and the distance of proximal (P = 0.50, WMD =  -1.09, 95%CI [-4.26, 2.08], I² = 96%) or distal (P = 0.18, WMD = 2.44, 95%CI [-1.13, 6.01], I² = 97%) resection margin. In addition, no significant differences were observed on overall/disease-free survival over 3/5 years between the two procedures. An analysis of subgroups that used propensity matching scores produced similar results.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic procedure is clinically safe and feasible for SFCC. It shows the advantages in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and overall complications, and the long-term survival outcomes would not be affected. Randomized clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted in the future for further investigation.