Should frailty contraindicate cancer surgery?

Using the hospital frailty risk score to assess oesophago-gastric cancer patient outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of clinical frailty in the assessment of patients planned for major surgery has proven to be an independent predictor of outcome. Since approximately half of all patients in the UK diagnosed with oesophagogastric (OG) cancer are over 75 years of age, assessment of frailty may be important in selection for surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study applied the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to data obtained from the NHS Secondary Uses Service electronic database for patients aged 75 years or older undergoing oesophagectomy and gastrectomy between April 2017 and March 2020. Descriptive statistics were performed to assess the effect of patient frailty on length of stay, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality rates. These outcomes were compared with those published by the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit.

RESULTS

Over 90% of the 1775 patients identified according to the age and resection criteria exhibited some degree of frailty. The median length of stay and 30-day readmission rate increased as patient frailty increased following both oesophagectomy and gastrectomy, as did the 30-day mortality rate following gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is a dynamic state and increasing age alone should not be a barrier to receiving the most appropriate treatment. Introducing standardized assessment of clinical frailty for patients with OG cancer to identify this cohort of patients earlier might enable targeted screening for frailty syndromes. This could facilitate the enhanced delivery of more holistic, frailty-attuned, approaches to person-centred care, and evidence-based treatment pathways for improved patient outcomes.

FRailty in Australian patients admitted to Intensive care unit after eLective CANCER-related SURGery: a retrospective multicentre cohort study (FRAIL-CANCER-SURG study)

BACKGROUND

The association between frailty and short-term and long-term outcomes in patients receiving elective surgery for cancer remains unclear, particularly in those admitted to the ICU.

METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we included adults ≥16 yr old admitted to 158 ICUs in Australia from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022 after elective surgery for cancer. We investigated the association between frailty and survival time up to 4 yr (primary outcome), adjusting for a prespecified set of covariates. We analysed how this association changed in specific subgroups (age categories [<65, 65-80, ≥80 yr], and those who survived hospitalisation), and over time by splitting the survival information at monthly intervals.

RESULTS

We included 35,848 patients (median follow-up: 18.1 months [inter-quartile range: 8.3-31.1 months], 19,979 [56.1%] male, median age 69.0 yr [inter-quartile range: 58.8-76.0 yr]). Some 3502 (9.8%) patients were frail (defined as clinical frailty scale ≥5). Frailty was associated with lower survival (hazard ratio: 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59-1.86 compared with clinical frailty scale ≤4); this was concordant across several sensitivity analyses. Frailty was most strongly associated with mortality early on in follow-up, up to 10 months (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.03-1.86), but this association plateaued, and its predictive capacity subsequently diminished with time up until 4 yr (1.96, 95% CI: 0.73-5.28). Frailty was associated with similar effects when stratified based on age, and in those who survived hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was associated with poorer outcomes after an ICU admission after elective surgery for cancer, particularly in the short term. However, its predictive capacity with time diminished, suggesting a potential need for longitudinal reassessment to ensure appropriate prognostication in this population.

The effect of aging on short- and long-term results after esophagectomy: an international multicenter retrospective analysis

The optimal treatment for esophageal cancer in elderly patients is still debated and data on postoperative results are limited. This retrospective international study aims to clarify the impact of age on clinical and oncological outcomes after esophagectomy. All patients that underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2007 and 2016 at two European high-volume Centers have been included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-age group (YAG) (18-69), middle-age group (70-74) and old-age group (>74). Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes considered were 5-year disease free survival and disease related survival, 90-day morbidity and mortality, readmission rate and radicality. A total of 575 patients were included. No differences emerged in terms of morbidity and length of stay, while mortality increased with aging from 2% in YAG to 4.8% in old-aged (P = 0.003). Old-age patients had less neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), a less aggressive mediastinal lymphadenectomy and presented a more advanced pathological stage. As expected, OS decreased significantly for older patients compared with the other two age groups (P = 0.044) but, on the other hand, disease free and disease related survival were comparable between the groups. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication to esophagectomy. Although in patients older than 75 years postoperative mortality is significantly increased, esophagectomy could be still an option in selected patients, favoring the use of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery protocols.

The predictive value of comorbidities on postoperative complication rates and overall survival in left-sided oncological colorectal resections: a multicentre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Surgical- and nonsurgical complications significantly worsen postoperative outcomes, and identification of patients at risk is crucial to improve care. This study investigated whether comorbidities, graded by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), impact complication rates and impair long-term outcome in a cohort of left-sided colorectal resections.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing oncological left-sided colorectal resections due to colorectal cancer between 01/2015 and 12/2020 in two referral centers in Austria using electronic medical records and national statistical bureau survival data. Patients with recurrent disease, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and emergency surgeries were excluded. Comorbidities were assessed using the CCI, and complication severity was defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing the risk for postoperative complications, and overall survival was assessed using data from the national statistics bureau.

RESULTS

A total of 471 patients were analyzed. Multinominal logistic regression analysis identified a CCI greater than or equal to 6 ( P =0.049; OR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.10-2.54) and male sex ( P =0.022; OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.21-2.98) as independent risk factors for major complications. While patients with a high CCI had the worst postoperative survival rates, perioperative complications only impacted on overall survival in patients with low CCIs, but not in patients with high CCIs.

CONCLUSION

Although a high CCI is a risk factor for major postoperative complications, the presence of comorbidities should not result in withholding surgery.

Frailty and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The relationship between frailty and the long-term clinical outcome of gastric cancer (GC) patients has not yet been established, although frailty is associated with a poor short-term outcome. The impact of frailty on long-term survival of GC patients was investigated through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Observational studies with longitudinal follow-ups for a minimum of one year were identified through a search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, in accordance with the objective of the meta-analysis. Combining the findings was achieved using a random-effects model, which accounted for inter-study heterogeneity.

Results

Ten datasets from nine cohort studies were included, which involved 7613 patients with GC. A total of 2074 patients (27.2%) were with frailty at baseline, and the mean follow-up duration was 48.1 months. A pooled analysis of the results showed that frailty was linked to a poor long-term overall survival in GC patients (risk ratio [RR]: 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27 to 2.13, p < 0.001; I2 = 80%). Sensitivity analysis showed consistent results in older patients (≥ 65 years, RR: 1.51, p = 0.002) and the oldest old (≥ 80 years, RR: 1.41, p = 0.01). In addition, frailty was also associated with poor long-term progression-free survival (RR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.39 to 1.96, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and disease-specific survival (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.37, p = 0.001; I2 = 4%).

Conclusion

Frailty is associated with poor long-term survival of patients with GC.