Relapse-independent multiple sclerosis progression under natalizumab

Risk of secondary progression in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab: a real-life study

BACKGROUND

one of the most important therapeutic goals in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis is to preclude conversion to secondary progression. Our objective was to determine the risk of progression associated with natalizumab treatment in an registry-based cohort of patients and to identify determinant factors.

METHODS

Patients with relapse-onset multiple sclerosis from the Registre Lorrain des Scléroses en Plaques (ReLSEP) were included if they had received one infusion of natalizumab between 2002 and 2021. The risk of secondary progression was determined using a standardized definition and a multi-state estimator to account for the possibility of stopping natalizumab before progression, and analyzed with multivariate Cox models.

RESULTS

574 patients were followed up for a median of 6.7 years. Of the 304 who stopped NTZ before progression onset, the probabilities (95% confidence interval) to convert to progression after 1, 2, 5 and 10 years were 3.2% (2.0-4.8%), 5.3% (3.6-7.3%), 17.5% (14.3-21.3%) and 28.3% (23.7-33.7%), respectively. Discontinuation of NTZ during follow-up was significantly associated with an increased risk of conversion in case of no resumption of a highly active treatment thereafter (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.7; 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.9; p = 0.001). The use of such a treatment was associated with a lower risk of progression (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.79; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

the risk of conversion to secondary progression associated with natalizumab treatment is relatively low but increases in case of natalizumab discontinuation in the absence of switch to highly active immunosuppressant.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is superior to alemtuzumab in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis and severe disability

OBJECTIVE

To assess the differences of treatment outcomes regarding disease activity in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or alemtuzumab (ATZ).

METHODS

Open-label prospective single-center observational cohort study, enrolling patients with highly active RMS for treatment with ATZ or HSCT between 2014 and 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (31/50 (62 %) in HSCT vs 19/50 (38 %) in ATZ group) were included. There were no significant differences in relapse rate, MRI activity or disability worsening between the two study groups during the first two years after treatment onset. However, at 3 to 5 years follow-up, HSCT was superior to ATZ in all the aforementioned aspects. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 5 years post treatment revealed superiority of HSCT in relapse rate (69.6 % vs 95.7 %, p = 0.027), MRI activity (54.5 % vs 75.1 %, p = 0.038) and disability worsening (57.1 % vs 90.9 %, p =  0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

ATZ may halt disability progression early in the course of highly active RMS, but the disability starts accumulating later, while in HSCT patients disability improvement is consistent both 3 and 5 years after treatment onset.

Harmonizing Definitions for Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Importance

Emerging evidence suggests that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a substantial contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To date, there is no uniform agreed-upon definition of PIRA, limiting the comparability of published studies.

Objective

To summarize the current evidence about PIRA based on a systematic review, to discuss the various terminologies used in the context of PIRA, and to propose a harmonized definition for PIRA for use in clinical practice and future trials.

Evidence Review

A literature search was conducted using the search terms multiple sclerosis, PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity, silent progression, and progression unrelated to relapses in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, published between January 1990 and December 2022.

Findings

Of 119 identified single records, 48 eligible studies were analyzed. PIRA was reported to occur in roughly 5% of all patients with RRMS per annum, causing at least 50% of all disability accrual events in typical RRMS. The proportion of PIRA vs relapse-associated worsening increased with age, longer disease duration, and, despite lower absolute event numbers, potent suppression of relapses by highly effective disease-modifying therapy. However, different studies used various definitions of PIRA, rendering the comparability of studies difficult.

Conclusion and Relevance

PIRA is the most frequent manifestation of disability accumulation across the full spectrum of traditional MS phenotypes, including clinically isolated syndrome and early RRMS. The harmonized definition suggested here may improve the comparability of results in current and future cohorts and data sets.

Should autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation be offered as a first-line disease modifying therapy to patients with multiple sclerosis?

In multiple sclerosis (MS), progression independent of new focal inflammation may commence shortly after disease onset, and it is increasingly revealed that the risk of disability accrual is reduced by early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs). People with aggressive MS may therefore benefit from early treatment with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), a procedure inducing maximal immunosuppression followed by immune reconstitution, demonstrated to be superior to DMTs in one randomized clinical trial. However, in current practice prior failure to HE-DMTs is typically required to establish the indication for AHSCT. In the present article, the available evidence on the potential role of AHSCT as first-line treatment in aggressive MS and the rationale for its early use will be summarized. Proposed definitions of aggressive MS that could help identifying MS patients eligible for early treatment with AHSCT will also be discussed.

Defining progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in adult patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A systematic review✰

BACKGROUND

Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) is heterogeneously described in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) regarding the frequency and nature of PIRA. This systematic review was conducted to characterise and define the elements of PIRA.

METHOD

This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted of the databases Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

5,812 studies were identified by the initial search. 13 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. PIRA definitions varied considerably between studies. In the context of these variable definitions, along with other methodological differences relating to disease modifying therapy (DMT) use and follow-up duration, the reported proportion of patients experiencing PIRA varied from 4% to 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently available research supports the presence of PIRA in relapsing MS. Based on review of the existing literature, we propose a definition of PIRA that is clinically relevant and minimises confounding from inclusion of patients who have reached the secondary progressive phase of the disease.

Real-world evidence of ocrelizumab-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis cohort shows changes in progression independent of relapse activity mirroring phase 3 trials

Ocrelizumab is a B cell-depleting drug widely used in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary-progressive MS. In RRMS, it is becoming increasingly apparent that accumulation of disability not only manifests as relapse-associated worsening (RAW) but also as progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) throughout the disease course. This study's objective was to investigate the role of PIRA in RRMS patients treated with ocrelizumab. We performed a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of clinical data acquired at a German tertiary multiple sclerosis referral center from 2018 to 2022. All patients with RRMS treated with ocrelizumab for at least six months and complete datasets were analyzed. Confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) was defined as a ≥ 12-week confirmed increase from the previous expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of ≥ 1.0 if the previous EDSS was ≤  5.5 or a ≥ 0.5-point increase if the previous EDSS was > 5.5. PIRA was defined as CDA without relapse since the last EDSS measurement and at least for the preceding 12 weeks. RAW was defined as CDA in an interval of EDSS measurements with ≥ 1 relapses. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the probability of developing PIRA depending on various factors, including disease duration, previous disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), and optical coherence tomography-assessed retinal degeneration parameters. 97 patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up time was 29 months (range 6 to 51 months). 23.5% developed CDA under ocrelizumab therapy (n = 23). Of those, the majority developed PIRA (87.0% of CDA, n = 20) rather than RAW (13.0% of CDA, n = 3). An exploratory investigation using Cox proportional hazards ratios revealed two possible factors associated with an increased probability of developing PIRA: a shorter disease duration prior to ocrelizumab (p = 0.02) and a lower number of previous DMTs prior to ocrelizumab (p = 0.04). Our data show that in ocrelizumab-treated RRMS patients, the main driver of disability accumulation is PIRA rather than RAW. Furthermore, these real-world data show remarkable consistency with data from phase 3 randomized controlled trials of ocrelizumab in RRMS, which may increase confidence in translating results from tightly controlled RCTs into the real-world clinical setting.

Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein in natalizumab-treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An alternative to neurofilament light

BACKGROUND

There is a need in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) treatment for biomarkers that monitor neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, treatment response, and disease progression despite treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) as a biomarker for clinical disease progression and brain volume measurements in natalizumab-treated RRMS patients.

METHODS

sGFAP and neurofilament light (sNfL) were measured in an observational cohort of natalizumab-treated RRMS patients at baseline, +3, +12, and +24 months and at the last sample follow-up (median 5.17 years). sGFAP was compared between significant clinical progressors and non-progressors and related to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived volumes of the whole brain, ventricle, thalamus, and lesion. The relationship between sGFAP and sNfL was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were included, and 47.7% progressed. sGFAP levels at baseline were higher in patients with gadolinium enhancement (1.3-fold difference, p = 0.04) and decreased in 3 months of treatment (adj. p < 0.001). No association was found between longitudinal sGFAP levels and progressor status. sGFAP at baseline and 12 months was significantly associated with normalized ventricular (positively), thalamic (negatively), and lesion volumes (positively). Baseline and 12-month sGFAP predicted annualized ventricle volume change rate after 1 year of treatment. sGFAP correlated with sNfL at baseline (p < 0.001) and last sample follow-up (p < 0.001) but stabilized earlier.

DISCUSSION

sGFAP levels related to MRI markers of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.

Natalizumab Promotes Activation of Peripheral Monocytes in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

Natalizumab (NTZ), a monoclonal antibody against very late antigen-4 (VLA-4), is one of the most efficient therapies to prevent acute relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS). VLA-4 is the key adhesion molecule for peripheral immune cells, especially lymphocytes to enter the CNS. While its blockade thus virtually abrogates CNS infiltration of these cells, long-term exposure to natalizumab may also affect immune cell function.

METHODS

In this study, we report that in patients with MS, NTZ treatment is associated with an enhanced activation status of peripheral monocytes.

RESULTS

Expression of 2 independent activation markers, CD69 and CD150, was significantly higher on blood monocytes from NTZ-treated patients when compared with those from matched untreated patients with MS, while other properties such as cytokine production remained unchanged.

DISCUSSION

These findings consolidate the concept that peripheral immune cells remain fully competent on NTZ treatment, an excellent asset rare among MS treatments. However, they also suggest that NTZ may exert nondesirable effects on the progressive aspect of MS, where myeloid cells and their chronic activation are attributed a prominent pathophysiologic role.

Treatment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Transitioning Between Relapsing and Progressive Disease

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system with a wide variety of clinical phenotypes. In spite of the phenotypic classification of MS patients, current data provide evidence that diffuse neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration coexist in all MS forms, the latter gaining increasing clinical relevance in progressive phases. Given that the transition phase of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is not well defined, and widely accepted criteria for SPMS are lacking, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) specifically designed for the transition phase have not been conducted. This review summarizes primary and secondary analyses and reports derived from phase III prospective clinical RCTs listed in PubMed of compounds authorised through the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of MS. The best data are available for interferon beta-1a (IFNb-1a) subcutaneous (s.c.), IFNb-1b s.c., mitoxantrone and siponimod, the latter being the most modern compound with likely the best risk-to-effect ratio. Moreover, there is a labels discrepancy for many disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) between the FDA and EMA, which have to be taken into consideration when opting for a specific DMT.

Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Many challenges exist in the precise diagnosis and clinical management of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) because of the lack of definitive clinical, imaging, immunologic, or pathologic criteria that demarcate the transition from relapsing-remitting MS to SPMS. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic criteria/definition and the heterogeneity associated with different SPMS patient populations; it also emphasizes the importance of available prospective/retrospective tools to identify patients with SPMS earlier in the disease course so that approved disease-modifying therapies and nonpharmacological strategies will translate into better outcomes. Delivery of such interventions necessitates an evolving patient-clinician dialog within the context of a multidisciplinary team.

MSProDiscuss™ Clinical Decision Support Tool for Identifying Multiple Sclerosis Progression

This article describes the rationale for the development of the MSProDiscuss™ clinical decision support (CDS) tool, its development, and insights into how it can help neurologists improve care for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a progressive disease characterized by heterogeneous symptoms and variable disease course. There is growing consensus that MS exists on a continuum, with overlap between relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive phenotypes. Evidence demonstrates that neuroaxonal loss occurs from the outset, that progression can occur independent of relapse activity, and that continuous underlying pathological processes may not be reflected by inflammatory activity indicative of the patient’s immune response. Early intervention can benefit patients, and there is a need for a tool that assists physicians in rapidly identifying subtle signs of MS progression. MSProDiscuss, developed with physicians and patients, facilitates a structured approach to patient consultations. It analyzes multidimensional data via an algorithm to estimate the likelihood of progression (the MSProDiscuss score), the contribution of various symptoms, and the impact of symptoms on daily living, enabling a more personalized approach to treatment and disease management. Data from CDS tools such as MSProDiscuss offer new insights into disease course and facilitate informed decision-making and a holistic approach to MS patient care.

Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with a chronic and often progressive disease course. The current disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) limit disease progression primarily by dampening immune cell activity in the peripheral blood or hindering their migration from the periphery into the CNS. New therapies are needed to target CNS immunopathology, which is a key driver of disability progression in MS. This article reviews Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (BTKIs), a new class of experimental therapy that is being intensely evaluated in MS. We focus on the potential peripheral and central mechanisms of action of BTKIs and their use in recent clinical trials in MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is evidence that some BTKIs cross the blood-brain barrier and may be superior to currently available DMTs at dampening the chronic neuroinflammatory processes compartmentalized within the CNS that contribute to progressive worsening in people withMS (pwMS). Recently, evobrutinib and tolebrutinib have shown efficacy in phase II clinical trials, and there are numerous ongoing phase III clinical trials of various BTKIs in relapsing and progressive forms of MS. Results from these clinical trials will be essential to understand the efficacy and safety of BTKIs across the spectrum of MS and keydifferences between specific BTKIs when treating pwMS. Inhibition of BTK has emerged as an attractive strategy to target cells of the adaptive and innate immune system outside and within the CNS. BTKIs carry great therapeutic potential across the MS spectrum, where key pathobiology aspects seem confined to the CNS compartment.