Stromal adipocyte PPARγ protects against breast tumorigenesis

Orthogonal assay and QSAR modelling of Tox21 PPARγ antagonist in vitro high-throughput screening assay

Disruption of signalling mediated by the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is associated with risk of cancer, metabolic diseases, and endocrine disruption. The purpose of this study was to identify environmental chemicals acting as PPARγ antagonists. Data from the Tox21 PPARγ antagonism assay were replicated using a reporter system in HEK293 cells. Two quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed, and five REACH-registered substances predicted positive were tested in vitro. Reporter assay results were consistent with Tox21 data since all conflicting results could be explained by assay interference. QSAR models showed good predictive performance, and follow-up experiments revealed two PPARγ antagonists out of three non-interfering chemicals. In conclusion, the developed QSAR models and follow-up experiments are important steps in the discovery of potential endocrine- and metabolism-disrupting chemicals.

Loss of PPARγ activity characterizes early protumorigenic stromal reprogramming and dictates the therapeutic window of opportunity

Although robustly expressed in the disease-free (DF) breast stroma, CD36 is consistently absent from the stroma surrounding invasive breast cancers (IBCs). In this study, we primarily observed CD36 expression in adipocytes and intralobular capillaries within the DF breast. Larger vessels concentrated in interlobular regions lacked CD36 and were instead marked by the expression of CD31. When evaluated in perilesional capillaries surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ, a nonobligate IBC precursor, CD36 loss was more commonly observed in lesions associated with subsequent IBC. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) governs the expression of CD36 and genes involved in differentiation, metabolism, angiogenesis, and inflammation. Coincident with CD36 loss, we observed a dramatic suppression of PPARγ and its target genes in capillary endothelial cells (ECs) and pericytes, which typically surround and support the stability of the capillary endothelium. Factors present in conditioned media from malignant cells repressed PPARγ and its target genes not only in cultured ECs and pericytes but also in adipocytes, which require PPARγ for proper differentiation. In addition, we identified a role for PPARγ in opposing the transition of pericytes toward a tumor-supportive myofibroblast phenotype. In mouse xenograft models, early intervention with rosiglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, demonstrated significant antitumor effects; however, following the development of a palpable tumor, the antitumor effects of rosiglitazone were negated by the repression of PPARγ in the mouse stroma. In summary, PPARγ activity in healthy tissues places several stromal cell types in an antitumorigenic state, directly inhibiting EC proliferation, maintaining adipocyte differentiation, and suppressing the transition of pericytes into tumor-supportive myofibroblasts.

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell metabolism, and anticancer therapy

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been extensively studied for over 3 decades and consist of three isotypes, including PPARα, γ, and β/δ, that were originally considered key metabolic regulators controlling energy homeostasis in the body. Cancer has become a leading cause of human mortality worldwide, and the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in cancer is increasingly being investigated, especially the deep molecular mechanisms and effective cancer therapies. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are an important class of lipid sensors and are involved in the regulation of multiple metabolic pathways and cell fate. They can regulate cancer progression in different tissues by activating endogenous or synthetic compounds. This review emphasizes the significance and knowledge of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell metabolism, and anti-cancer treatment by summarizing recent research on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. In general, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors either promote or suppress cancer in different types of tumor microenvironments. The emergence of this difference depends on various factors, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor type, cancer type, and tumor stage. Simultaneously, the effect of anti-cancer therapy based on drug-targeted PPARs differs or even opposes among the three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor homotypes and different cancer types. Therefore, the current status and challenges of the use of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists and antagonists in cancer treatment are further explored in this review.

The impact of obesity and adipokines on breast and gynecologic malignancies

The link between obesity and multiple disease comorbidities is well established. In 2003, Calle and colleagues presented the relationship between obesity and several cancer types, including breast, ovarian, and endometrial malignancies. Nearly, 20% of cancer-related deaths in females can be accounted for by obesity. Identifying obesity as a risk factor for cancer led to a focus on the role of fat-secreted cytokines, known as adipokines, on carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Early studies indicated that the adipokine leptin increases cell proliferation, invasion, and inhibition of apoptosis in multiple cancer types. As a greater appreciation of the obesity-cancer link has amassed, we now know that additional adipokines can impact tumorigenesis. A deeper understanding of the adipokine-activated signaling in cancer may identify new treatment strategies irrespective of obesity. Moreover, adipokines may serve as disease biomarkers, harnessing the potential of obesity-associated factors to serve as indicators of treatment response and disease prognosis. As studies investigating obesity and women's cancers continue to expand, it has become evident that breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers are distinctly impacted by adipokines. While complex, these distinct interactions may provide insight into cancer progression in these organs and new opportunities for targeted therapies. This review aims to organize and present the literature from the last 5 years investigating the mechanisms and implications of adipokine signaling in breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers with a special focus on leptin and adiponectin.

PPARs and Tumor Microenvironment: The Emerging Roles of the Metabolic Master Regulators in Tumor Stromal-Epithelial Crosstalk and Carcinogenesis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been extensively studied for more than three decades. Consisting of three isotypes, PPARα, γ, and β/δ, these nuclear receptors are regarded as the master metabolic regulators which govern many aspects of the body energy homeostasis and cell fate. Their roles in malignancy are also increasingly recognized. With the growing interest in crosstalk between tumor stroma and epithelium, this review aims to highlight the current knowledge on the implications of PPARs in the tumor microenvironment. PPARγ plays a crucial role in the metabolic reprogramming of cancer-associated fibroblasts and adipocytes, coercing the two stromal cells to become substrate donors for cancer growth. Fibroblast PPARβ/δ can modify the risk of tumor initiation and cancer susceptibility. In endothelial cells, PPARβ/δ and PPARα are pro- and anti-angiogenic, respectively. Although the angiogenic role of PPARγ remains ambiguous, it is a crucial regulator in autocrine and paracrine signaling of cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor-associated macrophages/immune cells. Of note, angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), a secretory protein encoded by a target gene of PPARs, triggers critical oncogenic processes such as inflammatory signaling, extracellular matrix derangement, anoikis resistance and metastasis, making it a potential drug target for cancer treatment. To conclude, PPARs in the tumor microenvironment exhibit oncogenic activities which are highly controversial and dependent on many factors such as stromal cell types, cancer types, and oncogenesis stages. Thus, the success of PPAR-based anticancer treatment potentially relies on innovative strategies to modulate PPAR activity in a cell type-specific manner.

Glitazone loaded fat enhances adiponectin production and inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation

Obesity and diabetes are both associated risk factors for developing breast cancer and poor patient outcomes. Adipose cells are an important endocrine system and are the main producer of adiponectin, with lean patients having higher circulating levels. Patients with diabetes are often treated with thiazolidinediones, glitazones, which also increase adiponectin production. Importantly high circulating levels of adiponectin and treatment with glitazone are associated with increased breast cancer patient survival. This study investigates the potential of using adipose tissue laden with glitazones to act as a drug depot, increase adiponectin levels, and locally release glitazones to inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation. The breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MBA-MD-231, and the normal breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A were exposed to media containing a range of concentrations of recombinant adiponectin, pioglitazone, or conditioned media obtained from pioglitazone laden adipose tissue to determine the impact of the different treatments on cell proliferation. The MCF-7 cells demonstrated the greatest reduction in proliferation upon exposure to adiponectin and pioglitazone with lower reductions observed in the MDA-MD-231 and MCF-10a cell lines. All three cell lines exhibited reductions in proliferation in the presence of pioglitazone loaded adipose tissue. Additionally, adiponectin and pioglitazone levels were higher in the media from glitazone loaded adipose tissue. Drug loaded adipose tissue could potentially be used to deliver adiponectin and glitazone to breast cancer cells and inhibit proliferation. Future research will examine the potential efficacy of this treatment approach in vivo.

Immunofluorescence Labeling of Nuclear Receptor Expression in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

Immunofluorescent staining (IF) uses antigen-antibody complexes tagged with fluorochromes to observe the expression of proteins within a tissue sample. Multiple groups have described optimized methods to visualize several proteins simultaneously within the same tissue section using immunofluorescence in both mouse and human FFPE tissues. Our group routinely uses an optimized protocol described here to examine nuclear receptor expression in experimental samples from conditional knockout in vivo studies.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and BRCA1

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists have been proposed as breast cancer preventives. Individuals who carry a mutated copy of BRCA1, DNA repair-associated gene, are at increased risk for development of breast cancer. Published data in the field suggest there could be interactions between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and BRCA1 that could influence the activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists for prevention. This review explores these possible interactions between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists and BRCA1 and discusses feasible experimental directions to provide more definitive information on the potential connections.

Examining the Role of Nuclear Receptors During In Vivo Chemical-Mediated Breast Tumorigenesis

The chemical carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) has been used for many decades to induce skin, mammary, and ovarian tumors in mice. There are however a wide range of doses and treatment regimens in the literature that sometimes confound comparative interpretations of different studies. Here we describe a proven method to generate in vivo DMBA-mediated murine mammary tumors to enable consistent studies of the cell targeted role of genes of interest during this process.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulation during Metabolic Diseases and Cancers: Master and Minions

The prevalence of obesity and metabolic diseases (such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and cardiovascular diseases) has increased in the last decade, in both industrialized and developing countries. This also coincided with our observation of a similar increase in the prevalence of cancers. The aetiology of these diseases is very complex and involves genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors. Much evidence indicates the central role undertaken by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in the development of these disorders. Due to the fact that their ligands could become crucial in future target-therapies, PPARs have therefore become the focal point of much research. Based on this evidence, this narrative review was written with the purpose of outlining the effects of PPARs, their actions, and their prospective uses in metabolic diseases and cancers.

Macrophage PPARγ inhibits Gpr132 to mediate the anti-tumor effects of rosiglitazone

Tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) significantly contributes to cancer progression. Human cancer is enhanced by PPARγ loss-of-function mutations, but inhibited by PPARγ agonists such as TZD diabetes drugs including rosiglitazone. However, it remains enigmatic whether and how macrophage contributes to PPARγ tumor-suppressive functions. Here we report that macrophage PPARγ deletion in mice not only exacerbates mammary tumor development but also impairs the anti-tumor effects of rosiglitazone. Mechanistically, we identify Gpr132 as a novel direct PPARγ target in macrophage whose expression is enhanced by PPARγ loss but repressed by PPARγ activation. Functionally, macrophage Gpr132 is pro-inflammatory and pro-tumor. Genetic Gpr132 deletion not only retards inflammation and cancer growth but also abrogates the anti-tumor effects of PPARγ and rosiglitazone. Pharmacological Gpr132 inhibition significantly impedes mammary tumor malignancy. These findings uncover macrophage PPARγ and Gpr132 as critical TAM modulators, new cancer therapeutic targets, and essential mediators of TZD anti-cancer effects.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18501.001

The immune system can both contribute to cancer progression and restrain the growth of tumors. Some immune cells – called macrophages – create an inflammatory environment around a tumor, which can support the spread of the cancer cells.

Independent observations and experiments have shown that a protein called PPARγ can suppress the development and growth of tumors. Drugs called thiazolidinediones (or TZDs for short), which are normally used to treat type 2 diabetes, activate PPARγ and therefore have anti-tumor effects. However, it is not fully understood how PPARγ and TZDs suppress tumor development.

Cheng et al. hypothesized that the PPARγ protein and TZDs can inhibit the activity of the inflammatory macrophages that help tumors to develop. To test this, mice were genetically engineered so that their macrophages could not produce the PPARγ protein. These engineered mice were more likely to develop breast cancer than normal. Furthermore, the breast tumors in the modified mice did not shrink when they were treated with TZDs, whereas the tumors of normal mice did.

Cheng et al. also found that PPARγ inhibits the ability of macrophages to produce a protein called Gpr132, which itself contributes to inflammation and allows breast cancer cells to grow. Mice that were unable to produce Grp132 displayed less inflammation, and cancer growth was blocked. Drugs that inhibited the activity of Grp132 in normal mice also reduced the ability of breast tumors to spread.

Future experiments will need to examine exactly how the Gpr132 proteins produced by macrophages communicate with the cancer cells. Furthermore, developing new drugs that can inhibit Gpr132 could ultimately lead to more effective treatments for cancer.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18501.002

DNA repair capacity is impaired in healthy BRCA1 heterozygous mutation carriers

BRCA1 germline mutations increase the lifetime risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. However, taking into account the differences in disease manifestation among mutation carriers, it is probable that different BRCA1 mutations have distinct haploinsufficiency effects and lead to the formation of different phenotypes. Using lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from heterozygous BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers, we investigated the haploinsufficiency effects of various mutation types using qPCR, immunofluorescence, and microarray technology. Lymphoblastoid cell lines carrying a truncating mutation showed significantly lower BRCA1 mRNA and protein levels and higher levels of gamma-H2AX than control cells or those harboring a missense mutation, indicating greater spontaneous DNA damage. Cells carrying either BRCA1 mutation type showed impaired RAD51 foci formation, suggesting defective repair in mutated cells. Moreover, compared to controls, cell lines carrying missense mutations displayed a more distinct expression profile than cells with truncating mutations, which is consistent with different mutations giving rise to distinct phenotypes. Alterations in the immune response pathway in cells harboring missense mutations point to possible mechanisms of breast cancer initiation in carriers of these mutations. Our findings offer insight into how various heterozygous mutations in BRCA1 could lead to impairment of BRCA1 function and provide strong evidence of haploinsufficiency in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Opposing roles for mammary epithelial-specific PPARγ signaling and activation during breast tumour progression

Background

Among women worldwide, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer, and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Improved understanding of breast tumourigenesis may facilitate the development of more effective therapies. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ is a transcription factor that regulates genes involved in insulin sensitivity and adipogenesis. Previously, we showed, using 7,12-dimethylbenz [a] anthracene (DMBA)-treated haploinsufficient PPARγ mice, that PPARγ suppresses breast tumour progression; however, the PPARγ expressing cell types and mechanisms involved remain to be clarified. Here, the role of PPARγ expression and activation in mammary epithelial cells (MG) with respect to DMBA-mediated breast tumourigenesis was investigated.

Methods

PPARγ MG knockout (PPARγ-MG KO) mice and their congenic, wild-type controls (PPARγ-WT) were treated once a week for six weeks by oral gavage with 1 mg DMBA dissolved in corn oil and maintained on a normal chow diet. At week 7, mice were randomly divided into those maintained on a normal chow diet (DMBA Only; PPARγ-WT: n = 25 and PPARγ-MG KO: n = 39) or those receiving a diet supplemented with the PPARγ ligand, rosiglitazone (ROSI, 4 mg/kg/day) (DMBA + ROSI; PPARγ-WT: n = 34 and PPARγ-MG KO: n = 17) for the duration of the 25-week study.

Results

Compared to DMBA Only-treated PPARγ-WTs, both breast tumour susceptibility and serum levels of proinflammatory and chemotactic cytokines, namely IL-4, eotaxin, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, and MIP-1α, were decreased among PPARγ-MG KOs. Cotreatment with ROSI significantly reduced breast tumour progression among PPARγ-WTs, correlating with increased BRCA1 and decreased VEGF and COX-2 protein expression levels in breast tumours; whereas, surprisingly DMBA + ROSI-treated PPARγ-MG KOs showed increased breast tumourigenesis, correlating with activation of COX-2.

Conclusion

These novel data suggest MG-specific PPARγ expression and signaling is critical during breast tumourigenesis, and may serve as a strong candidate predictive biomarker for response of breast cancer patients to the use of therapeutic strategies that include PPARγ ligands.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12943-015-0347-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

GAL3ST2 from mammary gland epithelial cells affects differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes

INTRODUCTION

In the mammary gland, the involution that occurs when lactation ends is an important period for cancer development. We have previously demonstrated stromal-epithelium interactions evaluating conditioned medium of adipose tissue on breast epithelial metalloproteases activity (Creydt et al., Clin Transl Oncol 15:124-131, 2013). Here, we evaluated the effects of conditioned medium of breast epithelial mammary cells on stromal cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Conditioned medium from normal murine mammary gland cell line (NMuMG) and conditioned medium proteins were obtained. Then, they were evaluated on modulation of adipocyte differentiation, using 3T3-L1 cell line.

RESULTS

We described, for the first time, that breast epithelial mammary cells could produce the enzyme galactose 3-O-sulfotransferase 2 (GAL3ST2). Importantly, GAL3ST2 is present in NMMuMG and two human breast cancer cell lines, and it is more strongly expressed in more metastatic tumors. When 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation was triggered in the presence of conditioned medium from NMuMG or GAL3ST2, triglyceride accumulation was decreased by 40 % and C/EBPβ expression by 80 % in adipocytes. In addition, the expression of FABP4 (aP2), another marker of adipocyte differentiation, was inhibited by 40 % in GAL3ST2-treated cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that GAL3ST2 would interfere with normal differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes; raising the possibility that it may affect normal differentiation of stromal preadipocytes and be a link to tumor metastatic capacity.

Distinct nuclear receptor expression in stroma adjacent to breast tumors

The interaction between breast tumor epithelial and stromal cells is vital for initial and recurrent tumor growth. While breast cancer-associated stromal cells provide a favorable environment for proliferation and metastasis, the molecular mechanisms contributing to this process are not fully understood. Nuclear receptors (NRs) are intracellular transcription factors that directly regulate gene expression. Little is known about the status of NRs in cancer-associated stroma. Nuclear Receptor Low-Density Taqman Arrays were used to compare the gene expression profiles of all 48 NR family members in a collection of primary cultured cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) obtained from estrogen receptor (ER)α positive breast cancers (n = 9) and normal breast adipose fibroblasts (NAFs) (n = 7). Thirty-three of 48 NRs were expressed in both the groups, while 11 NRs were not detected in either. Three NRs (dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia critical region, on chromosome X, gene 1 (DAX-1); estrogen-related receptor beta (ERR-β); and RAR-related orphan receptor beta (ROR-β)) were only detected in NAFs, while one NR (liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1)) was unique to CAFs. Of the NRs co-expressed, four were significantly down-regulated in CAFs compared with NAFs (RAR-related orphan receptor-α (ROR-α); Thyroid hormone receptor-β (TR-β); vitamin D receptor (VDR); and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ)). Quantitative immunohistochemistry for LRH-1, TR-β, and PPAR-γ proteins in stromal fibroblasts from an independent panel of breast cancers (ER-positive (n = 15), ER-negative (n = 15), normal (n = 14)) positively correlated with mRNA expression profiles. The differentially expressed NRs identified in tumor stroma are key mediators in aromatase regulation and subsequent estrogen production. Our findings reveal a distinct pattern of NR expression that therefore fits with a sustained and increased local estrogen microenvironment in ER-positive tumors. NRs in CAFs may provide a new avenue for the development of intratumoral-targeted therapies in breast cancer.

Lipoatrophy and severe metabolic disturbance in mice with fat-specific deletion of PPARγ

Adipose tissue is an important metabolic organ, the dysfunction of which is associated with the development of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is considered the master regulator of adipocyte differentiation and function. Although its cell-autonomous role in adipogenesis has been clearly demonstrated in cell culture, previous fat-specific knockouts of the murine PPARγ gene did not demonstrate a dramatic phenotype in vivo. Here, using Adipoq-Cre mice to drive adipose-specific recombination, we report a unique fat-specific PPARγ knockout (PPARγ FKO) mouse model with almost no visible brown and white adipose tissue at age 3 mo. As a consequence, PPARγ FKO mice had hugely enlarged pancreatic islets, massive fatty livers, and dramatically elevated levels of blood glucose and serum insulin accompanied by extreme insulin resistance. PPARγ FKO mice also exhibited delayed hair coat formation associated with absence of dermal fat, disrupted mammary gland development with loss of mammary fat pads, and high bone mass with loss of bone marrow fat, indicating the critical roles of adipose PPARγ in these tissues. Together, our data reveal the necessity of fat PPARγ in adipose formation, whole-body metabolic homeostasis, and normal development of fat-containing tissues.

Loss of PPARγ expression in mammary secretory epithelial cells creates a pro-breast tumorigenic environment

Breast cancer is the leading cause of new cancer diagnoses among women. Using peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ((+/-)) mice, we showed normal expression of PPARγ was critical to stop 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced breast tumorigenesis. PPARγ is expressed in many breast cell types including mammary secretory epithelial (MSE) cells. MSEs proliferate as required during pregnancy, and undergo apoptosis or reversible transdifferentiation during involution once lactation is complete. Thus, MSE-specific loss of PPARγ was hypothesized to enhance DMBA-mediated breast tumorigenesis. To test this, MSE cell-specific PPARγ knockout (PPARγ-MSE KO) and control (PPARγ-WT) mice were generated, mated and allowed to nurse for three days. One week after involution, dams were treated with DMBA to initiate breast tumors, and randomized on week 7 to continue receiving a normal chow diet (DMBA Only: PPARγ-WT, n = 15; PPARγ-MSE KO, n = 25) or one supplemented with a PPARγ activating drug (DMBA + ROSI: PPARγ-WT, n = 17; PPARγ-MSE KO, n = 24), and monitored for changes in breast tumor outcomes. PPARγ-MSE KOs had significantly lower overall survival and decreased mammary tumor latency as compared to PPARγ-WT controls. PPARγ activation significantly reduced DMBA-mediated malignant mammary tumor volumes irrespective of genotype. MSE-specific PPARγ loss resulted in decreased mammary gland expression of PTEN and Bax, increased superoxide anion production, and elevated serum eotaxin and RANTES, creating a protumorigenic environment. Moreover, PPARγ activation in MSEs delayed mammary tumor growth in part by down-regulating Cox-1, Cox-2 and cyclin D1. Collectively, these studies highlight a protective role of MSE-specific PPARγ during breast tumorigenesis, and support a novel chemotherapeutic role of PPARγ activation in breast cancer.

Antigen recovery and preservation using the microwave irradiation of biological samples for transmission electron microscopy analysis

Most studies using microwave irradiation (MWI) for the preparation of tissue samples have reported an improvement in structural integrity. However, there have been few studies on the effect of microwave (MW) on antigen preservation during sample preparation prior to immunolocalization. This report documents our experience of specimen preparation using an automatic microwave apparatus to obtain antigen preservation and retrieval. We tested the effects of MW processing vs. conventional procedures on the morphology and antigenicity of two different tissues: the brain and mammary gland, whose chemical composition and anatomical organization are quite different. We chose to locate the transcription factor PPARβ/δ using immunocytochemistry on brain tissue sections from hamsters. Antigen retrieval protocols involving MWI were used to restore immunoreactivity. We also studied the efficiency of the ultrastructural immunolocalization of both PPARγ and caveolin-1 following MWI vs. conventional treatment, on mammary gland tissue from mice at 10 days of lactation. Our findings showed that the treatment of tissue samples with MWI, in the context of a process lasting just a few hours from fixation to immunolocalization, enabled similar, or even better, results than conventional protocols. The quantification of immunolabeling for cav-1 indicated an increase in density of up to three-fold in tissues processed in the microwave oven. Furthermore, MW treatment permitted the localization of PPARβ/δ in glutaraldehyde-fixed specimens, which was impossible in the absence of MWI. This study thus showed that techniques involving the use of microwaves could largely improve both ultrastructure and immunodetection.

Diet, obesity, and cancer progression: are adipocytes the link?

Obesity has been linked to more aggressive characteristics of several cancers, including breast and prostate cancer. Adipose tissue appears to contribute to paracrine interactions in the tumor microenvironment. In particular, cancer-associated adipocytes interact reciprocally with cancer cells and influence cancer progression. Adipokines secreted from adipocytes likely form a key component of the paracrine signaling in the tumor microenvironment. In vitro coculture models allow for the assessment of specific adipokines in this interaction. Furthermore, micronutrients and macronutrients present in the diet may alter the secretion of adipokines from adipocytes. The effect of dietary fat and specific fatty acids on cancer progression in several in vivo model systems and cancer types is reviewed. The more common approaches of caloric restriction or diet-induced obesity in animal models establish that such dietary changes modulate tumor biology. This review seeks to explore available evidence regarding how diet may modulate tumor characteristics through changes in the role of adipocytes in the tumor microenvironment.

PPARγ agonists target aromatase via both PGE2 and BRCA1

Obesity is a well-recognized risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer. Although the underlying mechanisms are not clearly defined, aromatase is thought to play a pivotal role in connecting obesity-associated inflammation with postmenopausal breast cancer. It has been well established that both the proinflammatory prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) and the BRCA1 tumor-suppressor gene regulate aromatase expression. In this issue of the journal (beginning on p. 1183), Subbaramaiah and colleagues improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which PPARγ inhibits aromatase expression. They found that pioglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, inhibited aromatase expression by inhibition of PGE(2) signaling and upregulation of BRCA1. Their findings provide potential targets for preventing or treating obesity-related breast cancer.

Adult cartilage-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma knockout mice exhibit the spontaneous osteoarthritis phenotype

Osteoarthritis (OA) is an age-related progressive degenerative joint disease. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), a transcription factor, is suggested as an attractive therapeutic target to counteract degradative mechanisms associated with OA. Studies suggest that activation of PPARγ by its agonists can reduce the synthesis of OA catabolic and inflammatory factors and the development of cartilage lesions in OA animal models. Because these agonists impart several PPARγ-independent effects, the specific in vivo function of PPARγ in cartilage homeostasis and OA remains largely unknown. Herein, we describe the in vivo role of PPARγ in OA using cartilage-specific PPARγ knockout (KO) mice generated using the Cre-lox system. Adult PPARγ KO mice exhibited a spontaneous OA phenotype associated with enhanced cartilage degradation, hypocellularity, synovial and cartilage fibrosis, synovial inflammation, mononuclear cell influx in the synovium, and increased expression of catabolic factors, including matrix metalloproteinase-13, accompanied by an increase in staining for matrix metalloproteinase-generated aggrecan and type II collagen neoepitopes (VDIPEN and C1-2C). We demonstrate that PPARγ-deficient articular cartilage exhibits elevated expression of the additional catabolic factors hypoxia-inducible factor-2α, syndecan-4, and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 and of the inflammatory factors cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase. In conclusion, PPARγ is a critical regulator of cartilage health, the lack of which leads to an accelerated spontaneous OA phenotype.