1
|
Ambrad Giovannetti E, Rancz E. Behind mouse eyes: The function and control of eye movements in mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2024; 161:105671. [PMID: 38604571 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
The mouse visual system has become the most popular model to study the cellular and circuit mechanisms of sensory processing. However, the importance of eye movements only started to be appreciated recently. Eye movements provide a basis for predictive sensing and deliver insights into various brain functions and dysfunctions. A plethora of knowledge on the central control of eye movements and their role in perception and behaviour arose from work on primates. However, an overview of various eye movements in mice and a comparison to primates is missing. Here, we review the eye movement types described to date in mice and compare them to those observed in primates. We discuss the central neuronal mechanisms for their generation and control. Furthermore, we review the mounting literature on eye movements in mice during head-fixed and freely moving behaviours. Finally, we highlight gaps in our understanding and suggest future directions for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ede Rancz
- INMED, INSERM, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubinstein JF, Singh M, Kowler E. Bayesian approaches to smooth pursuit of random dot kinematograms: effects of varying RDK noise and the predictability of RDK direction. J Neurophysiol 2024; 131:394-416. [PMID: 38149327 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00116.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Smooth pursuit eye movements respond on the basis of both immediate and anticipated target motion, where anticipations may be derived from either memory or perceptual cues. To study the combined influence of both immediate sensory motion and anticipation, subjects pursued clear or noisy random dot kinematograms (RDKs) whose mean directions were chosen from Gaussian distributions with SDs = 10° (narrow prior) or 45° (wide prior). Pursuit directions were consistent with Bayesian theory in that transitions over time from dependence on the prior to near total dependence on immediate sensory motion (likelihood) took longer with the noisier RDKs and with the narrower, more reliable, prior. Results were fit to Bayesian models in which parameters representing the variability of the likelihood either were or were not constrained to be the same for both priors. The unconstrained model provided a statistically better fit, with the influence of the prior in the constrained model smaller than predicted from strict reliability-based weighting of prior and likelihood. Factors that may have contributed to this outcome include prior variability different from nominal values, low-level sensorimotor learning with the narrow prior, or departures of pursuit from strict adherence to reliability-based weighting. Although modifications of, or alternatives to, the normative Bayesian model will be required, these results, along with previous studies, suggest that Bayesian approaches are a promising framework to understand how pursuit combines immediate sensory motion, past history, and informative perceptual cues to accurately track the target motion that is most likely to occur in the immediate future.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Smooth pursuit eye movements respond on the basis of anticipated, as well as immediate, target motions. Bayesian models using reliability-based weighting of previous (prior) and immediate target motions (likelihood) accounted for many, but not all, aspects of pursuit of clear and noisy random dot kinematograms with different levels of predictability. Bayesian approaches may solve the long-standing problem of how pursuit combines immediate sensory motion and anticipation of future motion to configure an effective response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason F Rubinstein
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| | - Manish Singh
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| | - Eileen Kowler
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao C, Kim AS, Beams R, Badano A. Spatiotemporal image quality of virtual reality head mounted displays. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20235. [PMID: 36424434 PMCID: PMC9691731 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) head mounted displays (HMDs) require both high spatial resolution and fast temporal response. However, methods to quantify the VR image quality in the spatiotemporal domain when motion exists are not yet standardized. In this study, we characterize the spatiotemporal capabilities of three VR devices: the HTC VIVE, VIVE Pro, and VIVE Pro 2 during smooth pursuit. A spatiotemporal model for VR HMDs is presented using measured spatial and temporal characteristics. Among the three evaluated headsets, the VIVE Pro 2 improves the display temporal performance using a fast 120 Hz refresh rate and pulsed emission with a small duty cycle of 5%. In combination with a high pixel resolution beyond 2 k [Formula: see text] 2 k per eye, the VIVE Pro 2 achieves an improved spatiotemporal performance compared to the VIVE and VIVE Pro in the high spatial frequency range above 8 cycles per degree during smooth pursuit. The result demonstrates that reducing the display emission duty cycle to less than 20% is beneficial to mitigate motion blur in VR HMDs. Frame rate reduction (e.g., to below 60 Hz) of the input signal compared to the display refresh rate of 120 Hz yields replicated shadow images that can affect the image quality under motion. This work supports the regulatory science research efforts in development of testing methods to characterize the spatiotemporal performance of VR devices for medical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chumin Zhao
- grid.417587.80000 0001 2243 3366Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
| | - Andrea S. Kim
- grid.417587.80000 0001 2243 3366Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
| | - Ryan Beams
- grid.417587.80000 0001 2243 3366Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
| | - Aldo Badano
- grid.417587.80000 0001 2243 3366Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lowe KA, Zinke W, Cosman JD, Schall JD. Frontal eye fields in macaque monkeys: prefrontal and premotor contributions to visually guided saccades. Cereb Cortex 2022; 32:5083-5107. [PMID: 35176752 PMCID: PMC9989351 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuronal spiking was sampled from the frontal eye field (FEF) and from the rostral part of area 6 that reaches to the superior limb of the arcuate sulcus, dorsal to the arcuate spur when present (F2vr) in macaque monkeys performing memory-guided saccades and visually guided saccades for visual search. Neuronal spiking modulation in F2vr resembled that in FEF in many but not all respects. A new consensus clustering algorithm of neuronal modulation patterns revealed that F2vr and FEF contain a greater variety of modulation patterns than previously reported. The areas differ in the proportions of visuomotor neuron types, the proportions of neurons discriminating a target from distractors during visual search, and the consistency of modulation patterns across tasks. However, between F2vr and FEF we found no difference in the magnitude of delay period activity, the timing of the peak discharge rate relative to saccades, or the time of search target selection. The observed similarities and differences between the 2 cortical regions contribute to other work establishing the organization of eye fields in the frontal lobe and may help explain why FEF in monkeys is identified within granular prefrontal area 8 but in humans is identified within agranular premotor area 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleb A Lowe
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center
| | - Wolf Zinke
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center
| | - Joshua D Cosman
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center
| | - Jeffrey D Schall
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
BTN: Neuroanatomical aligning between visual object tracking in deep neural network and smooth pursuit in brain. Neurocomputing 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
6
|
Neural structure of a sensory decoder for motor control. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1829. [PMID: 35383170 PMCID: PMC8983777 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29457-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The transformation of sensory input to motor output is often conceived as a decoder operating on neural representations. We seek a mechanistic understanding of sensory decoding by mimicking neural circuitry in the decoder’s design. The results of a simple experiment shape our approach. Changing the size of a target for smooth pursuit eye movements changes the relationship between the variance and mean of the evoked behavior in a way that contradicts the regime of “signal-dependent noise” and defies traditional decoding approaches. A theoretical analysis leads us to propose a circuit for pursuit that includes multiple parallel pathways and multiple sources of variation. Behavioral and neural responses with biomimetic statistics emerge from a biologically-motivated circuit model with noise in the pathway that is dedicated to flexibly adjusting the strength of visual-motor transmission. Our results demonstrate the power of re-imagining decoding as processing through the parallel pathways of neural systems. Behavioral variation is thought to result from noise in sensory representations or final motor commands. In this study, the authors investigate variability in eye movements and model that variability as resulting from noisy sensorimotor transformations occurring in the middle temporal visual area.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tyson TL, Flynn-Evans EE, Stone LS. Differential saccade-pursuit coordination under sleep loss and low-dose alcohol. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1067722. [PMID: 36874639 PMCID: PMC9978352 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1067722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Ocular tracking of a moving object requires tight coordination between smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Normally, pursuit drives gaze velocity to closely match target velocity, with residual position offsets corrected by catch-up saccades. However, how/if common stressors affect this coordination is largely unknown. This study seeks to elucidate the effects of acute and chronic sleep loss, and low-dose alcohol, on saccade-pursuit coordination, as well as that of caffeine. Methods We used an ocular tracking paradigm to assess three metrics of tracking (pursuit gain, saccade rate, saccade amplitude) and to compute "ground lost" (from reductions in steady-state pursuit gain) and "ground recouped" (from increases in steady-state saccade rate and/or amplitude). We emphasize that these are measures of relative changes in positional offsets, and not absolute offset from the fovea. Results Under low-dose alcohol and acute sleep loss, ground lost was similarly large. However, under the former, it was nearly completely recouped by saccades, whereas under the latter, compensation was at best partial. Under chronic sleep restriction and acute sleep loss with a caffeine countermeasure, the pursuit deficit was dramatically smaller, yet saccadic behavior remained altered from baseline. In particular, saccadic rate remained significantly elevated, despite the fact that ground lost was minimal. Discussion This constellation of findings demonstrates differential impacts on saccade-pursuit coordination with low-dose alcohol impacting only pursuit, likely through extrastriate cortical pathways, while acute sleep loss not only disrupts pursuit but also undermines saccadic compensation, likely through midbrain/brainstem pathways. Furthermore, while chronic sleep loss and caffeine-mitigated acute sleep loss show little residual pursuit deficit, consistent with uncompromised cortical visual processing, they nonetheless show an elevated saccade rate, suggesting residual midbrain and/or brainstem impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence L Tyson
- Visuomotor Control Laboratory, Human Systems Integration Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States
| | - Erin E Flynn-Evans
- Fatigue Countermeasures Laboratory, Human Systems Integration Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States
| | - Leland S Stone
- Visuomotor Control Laboratory, Human Systems Integration Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Battaglini L, Ghiani A. Motion behind occluder: Amodal perception and visual motion extrapolation. VISUAL COGNITION 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1943094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Battaglini
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Physics and Astronomy “Galileo Galilei”, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Ghiani
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Passive Motor Learning: Oculomotor Adaptation in the Absence of Behavioral Errors. eNeuro 2021; 8:ENEURO.0232-20.2020. [PMID: 33593731 PMCID: PMC8009667 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0232-20.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Motor adaptation is commonly thought to be a trial-and-error process in which the accuracy of movement improves with repetition of behavior. We challenged this view by testing whether erroneous movements are necessary for motor adaptation. In the eye movement system, the association between movements and errors can be disentangled, since errors in the predicted stimulus trajectory can be perceived even without movements. We modified a smooth pursuit eye movement adaptation paradigm in which monkeys learn to make an eye movement that predicts an upcoming change in target direction. We trained the monkeys to fixate on a target while covertly, an additional target initially moved in one direction and then changed direction after 250 ms. The monkeys showed a learned response to infrequent probe trials in which they were instructed to follow the moving target. Additional experiments confirmed that probing learning or residual eye movements during fixation did not drive learning. These results show that motor adaptation can be elicited in the absence of movement and provide an animal model for studying the implementation of passive motor learning. Current models assume that the interaction between movement and error signals underlies adaptive motor learning. Our results point to other mechanisms that may drive learning in the absence of movement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu X, Rothwell AC, Spering M, Montagnini A. Expectations about motion direction affect perception and anticipatory smooth pursuit differently. J Neurophysiol 2021; 125:977-991. [PMID: 33534656 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00630.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Smooth pursuit eye movements and visual motion perception rely on the integration of current sensory signals with past experience. Experience shapes our expectation of current visual events and can drive eye movement responses made in anticipation of a target, such as anticipatory pursuit. Previous research revealed consistent effects of expectation on anticipatory pursuit-eye movements follow the expected target direction or speed-and contrasting effects on motion perception, but most studies considered either eye movement or perceptual responses. The current study directly compared effects of direction expectation on perception and anticipatory pursuit within the same direction discrimination task to investigate whether both types of responses are affected similarly or differently. Observers (n = 10) viewed high-coherence random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) moving rightward and leftward with a probability of 50%, 70%, or 90% in a given block of trials to build up an expectation of motion direction. They were asked to judge motion direction of interleaved low-coherence RDKs (0%-15%). Perceptual judgements were compared with changes in anticipatory pursuit eye movements as a function of probability. Results show that anticipatory pursuit velocity scaled with probability and followed direction expectation (attraction bias), whereas perceptual judgments were biased opposite to direction expectation (repulsion bias). Control experiments suggest that the repulsion bias in perception was not caused by retinal slip induced by anticipatory pursuit, or by motion adaptation. We conclude that direction expectation can be processed differently for perception and anticipatory pursuit.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show that expectations about motion direction that are based on long-term trial history affect perception and anticipatory pursuit differently. Whereas anticipatory pursuit direction was coherent with the expected motion direction (attraction bias), perception was biased opposite to the expected direction (repulsion bias). These opposite biases potentially reveal different ways in which perception and action utilize prior information and support the idea of different information processing for perception and pursuit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuyun Wu
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Austin C Rothwell
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Miriam Spering
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Institute for Computing, Information and Cognitive Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna Montagnini
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INT, Inst Neurosci Timone, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hiasat JG, Nischal KK. Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: Sport-related Concussions in Children. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil 2020; 70:128-133. [PMID: 33275076 DOI: 10.1080/2576117x.2020.1826289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Concussion is a worldwide health concern among children and adolescents. Over the decades concussion has been gradually better recognized as an entity that accounts for a significant disability post head trauma in patients. Patients present with cognitive, somatic and oculo-vestibular symptoms that can be incapacitating. Most concussion symptoms are transient and resolve within 1-2 weeks but can persist for years. Concussion pathophysiology is complex and may not be fully understood but it involves numerous mechanisms including cellular metabolic derangements, cerebral blood inflow, and axonal disruption. With no associated objective biomarkers or visible pathologic brain changes, diagnosis of concussion can be challenging. Many organizations and collaborative groups have suggested numerous definitions and diagnostic criteria for concussion in an attempt to improve the evidence-based clinical assessments and therapies for concussion. Proper assessment and evaluation is crucial starting from counseling of the patient, gradual return to cognitive and physical activity in an individualized treatment plan to ensure a timely return to daily activities and full sport participation. This report provides a grasp over the current state of sport-related concussion knowledge, diagnosis, and clinical evaluation in children and adolescent, with a focus on the ocular symptoms and signs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamila G Hiasat
- Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus, and Adult Motility, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ken K Nischal
- Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus, and Adult Motility, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rothwell AC, Wu X, Edinger J, Spering M. On the relation between anticipatory ocular torsion and anticipatory smooth pursuit. J Vis 2020; 20:4. [PMID: 32097481 PMCID: PMC7343430 DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.2.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Humans and other animals move their eyes in anticipation to compensate for sensorimotor delays. Such anticipatory eye movements can be driven by the expectation of a future visual object or event. Here we investigate whether such anticipatory responses extend to ocular torsion, the eyes’ rotation about the line of sight. We recorded three-dimensional eye position in head-fixed healthy human adults who tracked a rotating dot pattern moving horizontally across a computer screen. This kind of stimulus triggers smooth pursuit with a horizontal and torsional component. In three experiments, we elicited expectation of stimulus rotation by repeatedly showing the same rotation (Experiment 1), or by using different types of higher-level symbolic cues indicating the rotation of the upcoming target (Experiments 2 and 3). Across all experiments, results reveal reliable anticipatory horizontal smooth pursuit. However, anticipatory torsion was only elicited by stimulus repetition, but not by symbolic cues. In summary, torsion can be made in anticipation of an upcoming visual event only when low-level motion signals are accumulated by repetition. Higher-level cognitive mechanisms related to a symbolic cue reliably evoke anticipatory pursuit but did not modulate torsion. These findings indicate that anticipatory torsion and anticipatory pursuit are at least partly decoupled and might be controlled separately.
Collapse
|
13
|
Agtzidis I, Meyhöfer I, Dorr M, Lencer R. Following Forrest Gump: Smooth pursuit related brain activation during free movie viewing. Neuroimage 2020; 216:116491. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
14
|
Archer K, Pammer K, Vidyasagar TR. A Temporal Sampling Basis for Visual Processing in Developmental Dyslexia. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:213. [PMID: 32733217 PMCID: PMC7360833 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge of oscillatory entrainment and its fundamental role in cognitive and behavioral processing has increasingly been applied to research in the field of reading and developmental dyslexia. Growing evidence indicates that oscillatory entrainment to theta frequency spoken language in the auditory domain, along with cross-frequency theta-gamma coupling, support phonological processing (i.e., cognitive encoding of linguistic knowledge gathered from speech) which is required for reading. This theory is called the temporal sampling framework (TSF) and can extend to developmental dyslexia, such that inadequate temporal sampling of speech-sounds in people with dyslexia results in poor theta oscillatory entrainment in the auditory domain, and thus a phonological processing deficit which hinders reading ability. We suggest that inadequate theta oscillations in the visual domain might account for the many magno-dorsal processing, oculomotor control and visual deficits seen in developmental dyslexia. We propose two possible models of a magno-dorsal visual correlate to the auditory TSF: (1) A direct correlate that involves "bottom-up" magnocellular oscillatory entrainment of the visual domain that occurs when magnocellular populations phase lock to theta frequency fixations during reading and (2) an inverse correlate whereby attending to text triggers "top-down" low gamma signals from higher-order visual processing areas, thereby organizing magnocellular populations to synchronize to a theta frequency to drive the temporal control of oculomotor movements and capturing of letter images at a higher frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Archer
- Applied Psychology and Human Factors Laboratory, School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristen Pammer
- Applied Psychology and Human Factors Laboratory, School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Trichur Raman Vidyasagar
- Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee J, Darlington TR, Lisberger SG. The Neural Basis for Response Latency in a Sensory-Motor Behavior. Cereb Cortex 2020; 30:3055-3073. [PMID: 31828292 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We seek a neural circuit explanation for sensory-motor reaction times. In the smooth eye movement region of the frontal eye fields (FEFSEM), the latencies of pairs of neurons show trial-by-trial correlations that cause trial-by-trial correlations in neural and behavioral latency. These correlations can account for two-third of the observed variation in behavioral latency. The amplitude of preparatory activity also could contribute, but the responses of many FEFSEM neurons fail to support predictions of the traditional "ramp-to-threshold" model. As a correlate of neural processing that determines reaction time, the local field potential in FEFSEM includes a brief wave in the 5-15-Hz frequency range that precedes pursuit initiation and whose phase is correlated with the latency of pursuit in individual trials. We suggest that the latency of the incoming visual motion signals combines with the state of preparatory activity to determine the latency of the transient response that controls eye movement. IMPACT STATEMENT The motor cortex for smooth pursuit eye movements contributes to sensory-motor reaction time through the amplitude of preparatory activity and the latency of transient, visually driven responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonyeol Lee
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Timothy R Darlington
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Stephen G Lisberger
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Darlington TR, Lisberger SG. Mechanisms that allow cortical preparatory activity without inappropriate movement. eLife 2020; 9:50962. [PMID: 32081130 PMCID: PMC7060051 DOI: 10.7554/elife.50962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
We reveal a novel mechanism that explains how preparatory activity can evolve in motor-related cortical areas without prematurely inducing movement. The smooth eye movement region of the frontal eye fields (FEFSEM) is a critical node in the neural circuit controlling smooth pursuit eye movement. Preparatory activity evolves in the monkey FEFSEM during fixation in parallel with an objective measure of visual-motor gain. We propose that the use of FEFSEM output as a gain signal rather than a movement command allows for preparation to progress in pursuit without causing movement. We also show that preparatory modulation of firing rate in FEFSEM predicts movement, providing evidence against the ‘movement-null’ space hypothesis as an explanation of how preparatory activity can progress without movement. Finally, there is a partial reorganization of FEFSEM population activity between preparation and movement that would allow for a directionally non-specific component of preparatory visual-motor gain enhancement in pursuit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Darlington
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
| | - Stephen G Lisberger
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim S, Park J, Lee J. Effect of Prior Direction Expectation on the Accuracy and Precision of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements. Front Syst Neurosci 2019; 13:71. [PMID: 32038182 PMCID: PMC6988807 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The integration of sensory with top–down cognitive signals for generating appropriate sensory–motor behaviors is an important issue in understanding the brain’s information processes. Recent studies have demonstrated that the interplay between sensory and high-level signals in oculomotor behavior could be explained by Bayesian inference. Specifically, prior knowledge for motion speed introduces a bias in the speed of smooth pursuit eye movements. The other important prediction of Bayesian inference is variability reduction by prior expectation; however, there is insufficient evidence in oculomotor behaviors to support this prediction. In the present study, we trained monkeys to switch the prior expectation about motion direction and independently controlled the strength of the motion stimulus. Under identical sensory stimulus conditions, we tested if prior knowledge about the motion direction reduced the variability of open-loop smooth pursuit eye movements. We observed a significant reduction when the prior expectation was strong; this was consistent with the prediction of Bayesian inference. Taking advantage of the open-loop smooth pursuit, we investigated the temporal dynamics of the effect of the prior to the pursuit direction bias and variability. This analysis demonstrated that the strength of the sensory evidence depended not only on the strength of the sensory stimulus but also on the time required for the pursuit system to form a neural sensory representation. Finally, we demonstrated that the variability and directional bias change by prior knowledge were quantitatively explained by the Bayesian observer model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seolmin Kim
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Jeongjun Park
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Joonyeol Lee
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Smooth pursuit eye movements maintain the line of sight on smoothly moving targets. Although often studied as a response to sensory motion, pursuit anticipates changes in motion trajectories, thus reducing harmful consequences due to sensorimotor processing delays. Evidence for predictive pursuit includes (a) anticipatory smooth eye movements (ASEM) in the direction of expected future target motion that can be evoked by perceptual cues or by memory for recent motion, (b) pursuit during periods of target occlusion, and (c) improved accuracy of pursuit with self-generated or biologically realistic target motions. Predictive pursuit has been linked to neural activity in the frontal cortex and in sensory motion areas. As behavioral and neural evidence for predictive pursuit grows and statistically based models augment or replace linear systems approaches, pursuit is being regarded less as a reaction to immediate sensory motion and more as a predictive response, with retinal motion serving as one of a number of contributing cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Kowler
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; , ,
| | - Jason F Rubinstein
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; , ,
| | - Elio M Santos
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; , , .,Current affiliation: Department of Psychology, State University of New York, College at Oneonta, Oneonta, New York 13820, USA;
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim MD, Ueda J. Realization of Smooth Pursuit for a Quantized Compliant Camera Positioning System. IEEE T ROBOT 2018. [DOI: 10.1109/tro.2018.2858272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
20
|
Motor Sequence Learning in the Brain: The Long and Short of It. Neuroscience 2018; 389:85-98. [PMID: 29427654 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Motor sequence learning involves predictive processing that results in the anticipation of each component of a sequence of actions. In smooth pursuit, this predictive processing is required to decrease tracking errors between the eye and the stimulus. Current models for motor sequence learning suggest parallel mechanisms in the brain for acquiring sequences of differing complexity. We examined this model by comparing shorter versus longer sequences of pursuit eye movements during fMRI. In this way we were able to identify overlapping and distinct brain areas involved in simple versus more complex oculomotor learning. Participants revealed predictive pursuit eye movements from the second presentation of the stimulus in both short and long sequences. Brain imaging results indicated activation of parallel brain areas for the different sequence lengths that consisted of the Inferior Occipital Gyrus and the Cingulate as areas in common. In addition, distinct activation was found in more working memory related brain regions for the shorter sequences (e.g. the middle frontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and higher activation in the frontal eye fields, supplementary motor cortex and motor cortex for the longer sequences, independent on the number of repetitions. These findings provide new evidence that there are parallel brain areas that involve working memory circuitry for short sequences, and more motoric areas when the sequence is longer and more cognitively demanding. Additionally, our findings are the first to show that the parallel brain regions involved in sequence learning in pursuit are independent of the number of repetitions, but contingent on sequence complexity.
Collapse
|
21
|
Neural implementation of Bayesian inference in a sensorimotor behavior. Nat Neurosci 2018; 21:1442-1451. [PMID: 30224803 PMCID: PMC6312195 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0233-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Actions are guided by a Bayesian-like interaction between priors based on experience and current sensory evidence. Here, we unveil a complete neural implementation of Bayesian-like behavior, including adaptation of a prior. We recorded the spiking of single neurons in the smooth eye movement region of the frontal eye fields (FEFSEM), a region that is causally involved in smooth pursuit eye movements. Monkeys tracked moving targets in contexts that set different priors for target speed. Before the onset of target motion, preparatory activity encodes and adapts in parallel with the behavioral adaptation of the prior. During the initiation of pursuit, FEFSEM output encodes a maximum a posteriori estimate of target speed based on a reliability-weighted combination of the prior and sensory evidence. FEFSEM responses during pursuit are sufficient both to adapt a prior that may be stored in FEFSEM and, through known downstream pathways, to cause Bayesian-like behavior in pursuit.
Collapse
|
22
|
Isaacs BR, Forstmann BU, Temel Y, Keuken MC. The Connectivity Fingerprint of the Human Frontal Cortex, Subthalamic Nucleus, and Striatum. Front Neuroanat 2018; 12:60. [PMID: 30072875 PMCID: PMC6060372 DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Within the cortico basal ganglia (BG)-thalamic network, the direct and indirect pathways comprise of projections from the cortex to the striatum (STR), whereas the hyperdirect pathway(s) consist of cortical projections toward the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Each pathway possesses a functionally distinct role for action selection. The current study quantified and compared the structural connectivity between 17 distinct cortical areas with the STN and STR using 7 Tesla diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) in healthy young subjects. The selection of these cortical areas was based on a literature search focusing on animal tracer studies. The results indicate that, relative to other cortical areas, both the STN and STR showed markedly weaker structural connections to areas assumed to be essential for action inhibition such as the inferior frontal cortex pars opercularis. Additionally, the cortical connectivity fingerprint of the STN and STR indicated relatively strong connections to areas related to voluntary motor initiation such as the cingulate motor area and supplementary motor area. Overall the results indicated that the cortical-STN connections were sparser compared to the STR. There were two notable exceptions, namely for the orbitofrontal cortex and ventral medial prefrontal cortex, where a higher tract strength was found for the STN. These two areas are thought to be involved in reward processing and action bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany R. Isaacs
- Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Birte U. Forstmann
- Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Max C. Keuken
- Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Izawa Y, Suzuki H. Motor action of the frontal eye field on the eyes and neck in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 2018. [PMID: 29513149 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00577.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Focal stimulation in the frontal eye field (FEF) evoked eye movements that were often accompanied by neck movements. Experiments were performed with concurrent recording of both movements in trained monkeys. We recorded neck forces under a head-restrained condition with a force-measuring system. With the system, we measured forces along the x-, y-, and z-axes and torque about the z-axis. Torque about the z-axis that represented yaw rotation of the head was significantly affected by stimulation. We found that stimulation generated two types of motor actions of the eyes and neck. In the first type, contraversive neck forces were evoked by stimulation of the medial part of the FEF, where contraversive saccadic eye movements with large amplitudes were evoked. When the stimulus intensity was increased, saccades were evoked in an all-or-none manner, whereas the amplitude of neck forces increased gradually. In the second type, contraversive neck forces were evoked by stimulation of the medial and caudal part of the FEF, where ipsiversive slow eye movements were evoked. The depth profiles of amplitudes of neck forces were almost parallel to those of eye movements in individual stimulation tracks. The present results suggest that the FEF is involved in the control of motor actions of the neck as well as the eyes. The FEF area associated with contraversive saccades and contraversive neck movements may contribute to a gaze shift process, whereas that associated with ipsiversive slow eye movements and contraversive neck movements may contribute to a visual stabilization process. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Focal stimulation in the frontal eye field (FEF) evoked eye and neck movements. We recorded neck forces under a head-restrained condition with a force-measuring system. Taking advantage of this approach, we could analyze slow eye movements that were dissociated from the vestibuloocular reflex. We found ipsiversive slow eye movements in combination with contraversive neck forces, suggesting that the FEF may be a source of a corollary discharge signal for compensatory eye movements during voluntary neck movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Izawa
- Department of Systems Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo , Japan
| | - Hisao Suzuki
- Department of Systems Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kurata K. Hierarchical Organization Within the Ventral Premotor Cortex of the Macaque Monkey. Neuroscience 2018; 382:127-143. [PMID: 29715510 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed that the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) of nonhuman primates plays a pivotal role in various behaviors that require the transformation of sensory cues to appropriate actions. Examples include decision-making based on various sensory cues, preparation for upcoming motor behavior, adaptive sensorimotor transformation, and the generation of motor commands using rapid sensory feedback. Although the PMv has frequently been regarded as a single entity, it can be divided into at least five functionally distinct regions: F4, a dorsal convexity region immediately rostral to the primary motor cortex (M1); F5p, a cortical region immediately rostral to F4, lying within the arcuate sulcus; F5c, a ventral convexity region rostral to F4; and F5a, located in the caudal bank of the arcuate sulcus inferior limb lateral to F5p. Among these, F4 can be further divided into dorsal and ventral subregions (F4d and F4v), which are involved in forelimb and orofacial movements, respectively. F5p contains "mirror neurons" to understand others' actions based on visual and other types of information, and F4d and F5p work together as a functional complex involved in controlling forelimb and eye movements, most efficiently in the execution and completion of coordinated eye-hand movements for reaching and grasping under visual guidance. In contrast, F5c and F5a are hierarchically higher than the F4d, F5p, and F5v complexes, and play a role in decision-making based on various sensory discriminations. Hence, the PMv subregions form a hierarchically organized integral system from decision-making to eye-hand coordination under various behavioral circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyoshi Kurata
- Department of Physiology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cottereau BR, Smith AT, Rima S, Fize D, Héjja-Brichard Y, Renaud L, Lejards C, Vayssière N, Trotter Y, Durand JB. Processing of Egomotion-Consistent Optic Flow in the Rhesus Macaque Cortex. Cereb Cortex 2018; 27:330-343. [PMID: 28108489 PMCID: PMC5939222 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The cortical network that processes visual cues to self-motion was characterized with functional magnetic resonance imaging in 3 awake behaving macaques. The experimental protocol was similar to previous human studies in which the responses to a single large optic flow patch were contrasted with responses to an array of 9 similar flow patches. This distinguishes cortical regions where neurons respond to flow in their receptive fields regardless of surrounding motion from those that are sensitive to whether the overall image arises from self-motion. In all 3 animals, significant selectivity for egomotion-consistent flow was found in several areas previously associated with optic flow processing, and notably dorsal middle superior temporal area, ventral intra-parietal area, and VPS. It was also seen in areas 7a (Opt), STPm, FEFsem, FEFsac and in a region of the cingulate sulcus that may be homologous with human area CSv. Selectivity for egomotion-compatible flow was never total but was particularly strong in VPS and putative macaque CSv. Direct comparison of results with the equivalent human studies reveals several commonalities but also some differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit R Cottereau
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| | - Andrew T Smith
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Samy Rima
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| | - Denis Fize
- Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Moléculaire et Imagerie de Synthèse, CNRS-Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Yseult Héjja-Brichard
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| | - Luc Renaud
- CNRS, CE2F PRIM UMS3537, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Centre d'Exploration Fonctionnelle et de Formation, Marseille, France
| | - Camille Lejards
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| | - Nathalie Vayssière
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Trotter
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Durand
- Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ma Z, Watamaniuk SNJ, Heinen SJ. Illusory motion reveals velocity matching, not foveation, drives smooth pursuit of large objects. J Vis 2017; 17:20. [PMID: 29090315 PMCID: PMC5665499 DOI: 10.1167/17.12.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
When small objects move in a scene, we keep them foveated with smooth pursuit eye movements. Although large objects such as people and animals are common, it is nonetheless unknown how we pursue them since they cannot be foveated. It might be that the brain calculates an object's centroid, and then centers the eyes on it during pursuit as a foveation mechanism might. Alternatively, the brain merely matches the velocity by motion integration. We test these alternatives with an illusory motion stimulus that translates at a speed different from its retinal motion. The stimulus was a Gabor array that translated at a fixed velocity, with component Gabors that drifted with motion consistent or inconsistent with the translation. Velocity matching predicts different pursuit behaviors across drift conditions, while centroid matching predicts no difference. We also tested whether pursuit can segregate and ignore irrelevant local drifts when motion and centroid information are consistent by surrounding the Gabors with solid frames. Finally, observers judged the global translational speed of the Gabors to determine whether smooth pursuit and motion perception share mechanisms. We found that consistent Gabor motion enhanced pursuit gain while inconsistent, opposite motion diminished it, drawing the eyes away from the center of the stimulus and supporting a motion-based pursuit drive. Catch-up saccades tended to counter the position offset, directing the eyes opposite to the deviation caused by the pursuit gain change. Surrounding the Gabors with visible frames canceled both the gain increase and the compensatory saccades. Perceived speed was modulated analogous to pursuit gain. The results suggest that smooth pursuit of large stimuli depends on the magnitude of integrated retinal motion information, not its retinal location, and that the position system might be unnecessary for generating smooth velocity to large pursuit targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Ma
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Stephen J Heinen
- The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kurata K. Movement-related activity in the periarcuate cortex of monkeys during coordinated eye and hand movements. J Neurophysiol 2017; 118:3293-3310. [DOI: 10.1152/jn.00279.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
To determine the role of the periarcuate cortex during coordinated eye and hand movements in monkeys, the present study examined neuronal activity in this region during movement with the hand, eyes, or both as effectors toward a visuospatial target. Similar to the primary motor cortex (M1), the dorsal premotor cortex contained a higher proportion of neurons that were closely related to hand movements, whereas saccade-related neurons were frequently recorded from the frontal eye field (FEF). Interestingly, neurons that exhibited activity related to both eye and hand movements were recorded most frequently in the ventral premotor cortex (PMv), located between the FEF and M1. Neuronal activity in the periarcuate cortex was highly modulated during coordinated movements compared with either eye or hand movement only. Additionally, a small number of neurons were active specifically during one of the three task modes, which could be dissociated from the effector activity. In this case, neuron onset was either ahead of or behind the onset of eye and/or hand movement, and some neuronal activity lasted until reward delivery signaled successful completion of reaching. The present findings indicate that the periarcuate cortex, particularly the PMv, plays important roles in orchestrating coordinated movements from the initiation to the termination of reaching. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Movement-related neuronal activity was recorded throughout the periarcuate cortex of monkeys that performed a task requiring them to move their hand only, eyes only, or both hand and eyes toward visuospatial targets. Most typically, neurons were found that were commonly active regardless of different effectors, from movement initiation to completion of a successful outcome. The findings suggest that the periarcuate cortex as a whole plays a crucial role in initiating and completing coordinated eye-hand movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyoshi Kurata
- Department of Physiology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Stepniewska I, Pouget P, Kaas JH. Frontal eye field in prosimian galagos: Intracortical microstimulation and tracing studies. J Comp Neurol 2017; 526:626-652. [PMID: 29127718 DOI: 10.1002/cne.24355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The frontal eye field (FEF) in prosimian primates was identified as a small cortical region, above and anterior to the anterior frontal sulcus, from which saccadic eye movements were evoked with electrical stimulation. Tracer injections revealed FEF connections with cortical and subcortical structures participating in higher order visual processing. Ipsilateral cortical connections were the densest with adjoining parts of the dorsal premotor and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Label in a region corresponding to supplementary eye field (SEF) of other primates, suggests the existence of SEF in galagos. Other connections were with ventral premotor cortex (PMV), the caudal half of posterior parietal cortex, cingulate cortex, visual areas within the superior temporal sulcus, and inferotemporal cortex. Callosal connections were mostly with the region of the FEF of another hemisphere, SEF, PFC, and PMV. Most subcortical connections were ipsilateral, but some were bilateral. Dense bilateral connections were to caudate nuclei. Densest reciprocal ipsilateral connections were with the paralamellar portion of mediodorsal nucleus, intralaminar nuclei and magnocellular portion of ventral anterior nucleus. Other FEF connections were with the claustrum, reticular nucleus, zona incerta, lateral posterior and medial pulvinar nuclei, nucleus limitans, pretectal area, nucleus of Darkschewitsch, mesencephalic and pontine reticular formation and pontine nuclei. Surprisingly, the superior colliculus (SC) contained only sparse anterograde label. Although most FEF connections in galagos are similar to those in monkeys, the FEF-SC connections appear to be much less. This suggests that a major contribution of the FEF to visuomotor functions of SC emerged with the evolution of anthropoid primates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwona Stepniewska
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Pierre Pouget
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jon H Kaas
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yang L, Gu Y. Distinct spatial coordinate of visual and vestibular heading signals in macaque FEFsem and MSTd. eLife 2017; 6. [PMID: 29134944 PMCID: PMC5685470 DOI: 10.7554/elife.29809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Precise heading estimate requires integration of visual optic flow and vestibular inertial motion originating from distinct spatial coordinates (eye- and head-centered, respectively). To explore whether the two heading signals may share a common reference frame along the hierarchy of cortical stages, we explored two multisensory areas in macaques: the smooth pursuit area of the frontal eye field (FEFsem) closer to the motor side, and the dorsal portion of medial superior temporal area (MSTd) closer to the sensory side. In both areas, vestibular signals are head-centered, whereas visual signals are mainly eye-centered. However, visual signals in FEFsem are more shifted towards the head coordinate compared to MSTd. These results are robust being largely independent on: (1) smooth pursuit eye movement, (2) motion parallax cue, and (3) behavioral context for active heading estimation, indicating that the visual and vestibular heading signals may be represented in distinct spatial coordinate in sensory cortices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihua Yang
- Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Gu
- Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bakst L, Fleuriet J, Mustari MJ. FEFsem neuronal response during combined volitional and reflexive pursuit. J Vis 2017; 17:13. [PMID: 28538993 PMCID: PMC5445972 DOI: 10.1167/17.5.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Although much is known about volitional and reflexive smooth eye movements individually, much less is known about how they are coordinated. It is hypothesized that separate cortico-ponto-cerebellar loops subserve these different types of smooth eye movements. Specifically, the MT-MST-DLPN pathway is thought to be critical for ocular following eye movements, whereas the FEF-NRTP pathway is understood to be vital for volitional smooth pursuit. However, the role that these loops play in combined volitional and reflexive behavior is unknown. We used a large, textured background moving in conjunction with a small target spot to investigate the eye movements evoked by a combined volitional and reflexive pursuit task. We also assessed the activity of neurons in the smooth eye movement subregion of the frontal eye field (FEFsem). We hypothesized that the pursuit system would show less contribution from the volitional pathway in this task, owing to the increased involvement of the reflexive pathway. In accordance with this hypothesis, a majority of FEFsem neurons (63%) were less active during pursuit maintenance in a combined volitional and reflexive pursuit task than during purely volitional pursuit. Interestingly and surprisingly, the neuronal response to the addition of the large-field motion was highly correlated with the neuronal response to a target blink. This suggests that FEFsem neuronal responses to these different perturbations—whether the addition or subtraction of retinal input—may be related. We conjecture that these findings are due to changing weights of both the volitional and reflexive pathways, as well as retinal and extraretinal signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Bakst
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jérome Fleuriet
- Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael J Mustari
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
If a visual object of interest suddenly starts to move, we will try to follow it with a smooth movement of the eyes. This smooth pursuit response aims to reduce image motion on the retina that could blur visual perception. In recent years, our knowledge of the neural control of smooth pursuit initiation has sharply increased. However, stopping smooth pursuit eye movements is less well understood and will be discussed in this paper. The most straightforward way to study smooth pursuit stopping is by interrupting image motion on the retina. This causes eye velocity to decay exponentially towards zero. However, smooth pursuit stopping is not a passive response, as shown by behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Moreover, smooth pursuit stopping is particularly influenced by active prediction of the upcoming end of the target. Here, we suggest that a particular class of inhibitory neurons of the brainstem, the omnipause neurons, could play a central role in pursuit stopping. Furthermore, the role of supplementary eye fields of the frontal cortex in smooth pursuit stopping is also discussed.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Missal
- Institute of Neuroscience (IONS), Cognition and Systems (COSY), Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stephen J Heinen
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bakst L, Fleuriet J, Mustari MJ. Temporal dynamics of retinal and extraretinal signals in the FEFsem during smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 2017; 117:1987-2003. [PMID: 28202571 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00786.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurons in the smooth eye movement subregion of the frontal eye field (FEFsem) are known to play an important role in voluntary smooth pursuit eye movements. Underlying this function are projections to parietal and prefrontal visual association areas and subcortical structures, all known to play vital but differing roles in the execution of smooth pursuit. Additionally, the FEFsem has been shown to carry a diverse array of signals (e.g., eye velocity, acceleration, gain control). We hypothesized that distinct subpopulations of FEFsem neurons subserve these diverse functions and projections, and that the relative weights of retinal and extraretinal signals could form the basis for categorization of units. To investigate this, we used a step-ramp tracking task with a target blink to determine the relative contributions of retinal and extraretinal signals in individual FEFsem neurons throughout pursuit. We found that the contributions of retinal and extraretinal signals to neuronal activity and behavior change throughout the time course of pursuit. A clustering algorithm revealed three distinct neuronal subpopulations: cluster 1 was defined by a higher sensitivity to eye velocity, acceleration, and retinal image motion; cluster 2 had greater activity during blinks; and cluster 3 had significantly greater eye position sensitivity. We also performed a comparison with a sample of medial superior temporal neurons to assess similarities and differences between the two areas. Our results indicate the utility of simple tests such as the target blink for parsing the complex and multifaceted roles of cortical areas in behavior.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The frontal eye field (FEF) is known to play a critical role in volitional smooth pursuit, carrying a variety of signals that are distributed throughout the brain. This study used a novel application of a target blink task during step ramp tracking to determine, in combination with a clustering algorithm, the relative contributions of retinal and extraretinal signals to FEF activity and the extent to which these contributions could form the basis for a categorization of neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Bakst
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jérome Fleuriet
- Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Michael J Mustari
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; .,Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.,Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhu JE, Ma WJ. Orientation-dependent biases in length judgments of isolated stimuli. J Vis 2017; 17:20. [PMID: 28245499 DOI: 10.1167/17.2.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Vertical line segments tend to be perceived as longer than horizontal ones of the same length, but this may in part be due to configuration effects. To minimize such effects, we used isolated line segments in a two-interval, forced choice paradigm, not limiting ourselves to horizontal and vertical. We fitted psychometric curves using a Bayesian method that assumes that, for a given subject, the lapse rate is the same across all conditions. The closer a line segment's orientation was to vertical, the longer it was perceived to be. Moreover, subjects tended to report the standard line (in the second interval) as longer. The data were well described by a model that contains both an orientation-dependent and an interval-dependent multiplicative bias. Using this model, we estimated that a vertical line was on average perceived as 9.2% ± 2.1% longer than a horizontal line, and a second-interval line was on average perceived as 2.4% ± 0.9% longer than a first-interval line. Moving from a descriptive to an explanatory model, we hypothesized that anisotropy in the polar angle of lines in three dimensions underlies the horizontal-vertical illusion, specifically, that line segments more often have a polar angle of 90° (corresponding to the ground plane) than any other polar angle. This model qualitatively accounts not only for the empirical relationship between projected length and projected orientation that predicts the horizontal-vertical illusion, but also for the empirical distribution of projected orientation in photographs of natural scenes and for paradoxical results reported earlier for slanted surfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jielei Emma Zhu
- Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY,
| | - Wei Ji Ma
- Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY,
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
An fMRI study of training voluntary smooth circular eye movements. Exp Brain Res 2016; 235:819-831. [PMID: 27889814 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4843-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Despite a large number of recent studies, the promise of fMRI methods to produce valuable insights into motor skill learning has been restricted to sequence learning paradigms, or manual training paradigms where a relatively advanced capacity for sensory-motor integration and effector coordination already exists. We therefore obtained fMRIs from 16 healthy adults trained in a new paradigm that demanded voluntary smooth circular eye movements without a moving target. This aimed to monitor neural activation during two possible motor learning processes: (a) the smooth pursuit control system develops a new perceptual-motor relationship and successfully becomes involved in voluntary action in which it is not normally involved or (b) the saccadic system normally used for voluntary eye movement and which only exhibits linear action skill develops new dynamic coordinative control capable of smooth circular movement. Participants were able to improve within half an hour, typically demonstrating saccadic movement with progressively reduced amplitudes, which better approximated smooth circular movement. Activity in the inferior premotor cortex was significantly modulated and decreased during the progress of learning. In contrast, activations in dorsal premotor and parietal cortex along the intraparietal sulcus, the supplementary eye field and the anterior cerebellum did not change during training. Thus, the decrease of activity in inferior premotor cortex was critically related to the learning progress in visuospatial eye movement control.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gu Y, Cheng Z, Yang L, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE. Multisensory Convergence of Visual and Vestibular Heading Cues in the Pursuit Area of the Frontal Eye Field. Cereb Cortex 2016; 26:3785-801. [PMID: 26286917 PMCID: PMC5004753 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Both visual and vestibular sensory cues are important for perceiving one's direction of heading during self-motion. Previous studies have identified multisensory, heading-selective neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd) and the ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Both MSTd and VIP have strong recurrent connections with the pursuit area of the frontal eye field (FEFsem), but whether FEFsem neurons may contribute to multisensory heading perception remain unknown. We characterized the tuning of macaque FEFsem neurons to visual, vestibular, and multisensory heading stimuli. About two-thirds of FEFsem neurons exhibited significant heading selectivity based on either vestibular or visual stimulation. These multisensory neurons shared many properties, including distributions of tuning strength and heading preferences, with MSTd and VIP neurons. Fisher information analysis also revealed that the average FEFsem neuron was almost as sensitive as MSTd or VIP cells. Visual and vestibular heading preferences in FEFsem tended to be either matched (congruent cells) or discrepant (opposite cells), such that combined stimulation strengthened heading selectivity for congruent cells but weakened heading selectivity for opposite cells. These findings demonstrate that, in addition to oculomotor functions, FEFsem neurons also exhibit properties that may allow them to contribute to a cortical network that processes multisensory heading cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Gu
- Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhixian Cheng
- Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, Shanghai, China
| | - Lihua Yang
- Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, Shanghai, China
| | - Gregory C. DeAngelis
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Dora E. Angelaki
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Primates use two types of voluntary eye movements to track objects of interest: pursuit and saccades. Traditionally, these two eye movements have been viewed as distinct systems that are driven automatically by low-level visual inputs. However, two sets of findings argue for a new perspective on the control of voluntary eye movements. First, recent experiments have shown that pursuit and saccades are not controlled by entirely different neural pathways but are controlled by similar networks of cortical and subcortical regions and, in some cases, by the same neurons. Second, pursuit and saccades are not automatic responses to retinal inputs but are regulated by a process of target selection that involves a basic form of decision making. The selection process itself is guided by a variety of complex processes, including attention, perception, memory, and expectation. Together, these findings indicate that pursuit and saccades share a similar functional architecture. These points of similarity may hold the key for understanding how neural circuits negotiate the links between the many higher order functions that can influence behavior and the singular and coordinated motor actions that follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Krauzlis
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Heinen SJ, Potapchuk E, Watamaniuk SNJ. A foveal target increases catch-up saccade frequency during smooth pursuit. J Neurophysiol 2015; 115:1220-7. [PMID: 26631148 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00774.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 12/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Images that move rapidly across the retina of the human eye blur because the retina has sluggish temporal dynamics. Voluntary smooth pursuit eye movements are modeled as matching object velocity to minimize retinal motion and prevent retinal blurring. However, "catch-up" saccades that are ubiquitous during pursuit interrupt it and disrupt clear vision. But catch-up saccades may not be a common feature of ocular pursuit, because their existence has been documented with a small moving spot, the classic pursuit stimulus, which is a weak motion stimulus that may poorly emulate larger pursuit objects. We found that spot pursuit does not generalize to that of larger objects. Observers pursued a spot or a larger virtual object with or without a superimposed spot target. Single-spot targets produced lower pursuit acceleration than larger objects. Critically, more saccadic intrusions occurred when stimuli had a central dot, even when position and velocity errors were equated, suggesting that catch-up saccades result from pursuing a single, small object or a feature on a large one. To determine what differentiates a large object from a small one, we progressively shrank the featureless virtual object and found that catch-up saccade frequency was highest when it fit in the fovea. The results suggest that pursuit of a small target or an object feature recruits a saccade mechanism that does not compensate for a weak motion signal; rather, the target compels foveation. Furthermore, catch-up saccades are likely generated by neural circuitry typically used to foveate small objects or features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Heinen
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Elena Potapchuk
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G. Lisberger
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710;
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bucci MP, Ajrezo L, Wiener‐Vacher S. Oculomotor tasks affect differently postural control in healthy children. Int J Dev Neurosci 2015; 46:1-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Revised: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pia Bucci
- Vestibular and Oculomotor Evaluation UnitENT DepartmentRobert Debré University Hospital48 Boulevard Sérurier75019ParisFrance
- UMR 1141, INSERM – Université Paris 7Robert Debré University Hospital48 Boulevard SérurierParisFrance
| | - Layla Ajrezo
- Vestibular and Oculomotor Evaluation UnitENT DepartmentRobert Debré University Hospital48 Boulevard Sérurier75019ParisFrance
- UMR 1141, INSERM – Université Paris 7Robert Debré University Hospital48 Boulevard SérurierParisFrance
| | - Sylvette Wiener‐Vacher
- Vestibular and Oculomotor Evaluation UnitENT DepartmentRobert Debré University Hospital48 Boulevard Sérurier75019ParisFrance
- UMR 1141, INSERM – Université Paris 7Robert Debré University Hospital48 Boulevard SérurierParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ferrera VP. Smooth pursuit preparation modulates neuronal responses in visual areas MT and MST. J Neurophysiol 2015; 114:638-49. [PMID: 26019315 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00636.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2014] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Primates are able to track small moving visual targets using smooth pursuit eye movements. Target motion for smooth pursuit is signaled by neurons in visual cortical areas MT and MST. In this study, we trained monkeys to either initiate or withhold smooth pursuit in the presence of a moving target to test whether this decision was reflected in the relative strength of "go" and "no-go" processes. We found that the gain of the motor response depended strongly on whether monkeys were instructed to initiate or withhold pursuit, thus demonstrating voluntary control of pursuit initiation. We found that the amplitude of the neuronal response to moving targets in areas MT and MST was also significantly lower on no-go trials (by 2.1 spikes/s on average). The magnitude of the neural response reduction was small compared with the behavioral gain reduction. There were no significant differences in neuronal direction selectivity, spatial selectivity, or response reliability related to pursuit initiation or the absence thereof. Variability in eye speed was negatively correlated with firing rate variability after target motion onset during go trials but not during no-go trials, suggesting that MT and MST activity represents an error signal for a negative feedback controller. We speculate that modulation of the visual motion signals in areas MT and MST may be one of the first visual cortical events in the initiation of smooth pursuit and that the small early response modulation may be amplified to produce an all-or-none motor response by downstream areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Ferrera
- Departments of Neuroscience and Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim HR, Angelaki DE, DeAngelis GC. A novel role for visual perspective cues in the neural computation of depth. Nat Neurosci 2014; 18:129-37. [PMID: 25436667 PMCID: PMC4281299 DOI: 10.1038/nn.3889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
As we explore a scene, our eye movements add global patterns of motion to the retinal image, complicating visual motion produced by self-motion or moving objects. Conventionally, it has been assumed that extra-retinal signals, such as efference copy of smooth pursuit commands, are required to compensate for the visual consequences of eye rotations. We consider an alternative possibility: namely, that the visual system can infer eye rotations from global patterns of image motion. We visually simulated combinations of eye translation and rotation, including perspective distortions that change dynamically over time. We demonstrate that incorporating these “dynamic perspective” cues allows the visual system to generate selectivity for depth sign from motion parallax in macaque area MT, a computation that was previously thought to require extra-retinal signals regarding eye velocity. Our findings suggest novel neural mechanisms that analyze global patterns of visual motion to perform computations that require knowledge of eye rotations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HyungGoo R Kim
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Dora E Angelaki
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gregory C DeAngelis
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bolding MS, Lahti AC, White D, Moore C, Gurler D, Gawne TJ, Gamlin PD. Vergence eye movements in patients with schizophrenia. Vision Res 2014; 102:64-70. [PMID: 25088242 PMCID: PMC4180079 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Revised: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that smooth pursuit eye movements are impaired in patients with schizophrenia. However, under normal viewing conditions, targets move not only in the frontoparallel plane but also in depth, and tracking them requires both smooth pursuit and vergence eye movements. Although previous studies in humans and non-human primates suggest that these two eye movement subsystems are relatively independent of one another, to our knowledge, there have been no prior studies of vergence tracking behavior in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, we have investigated these eye movements in patients with schizophrenia and in healthy controls. We found that patients with schizophrenia exhibited substantially lower gains compared to healthy controls during vergence tracking at all tested speeds (e.g. 0.25 Hz vergence tracking mean gain of 0.59 vs. 0.86). Further, consistent with previous reports, patients with schizophrenia exhibited significantly lower gains than healthy controls during smooth pursuit at higher target speeds (e.g. 0.5 Hz smooth pursuit mean gain of 0.64 vs. 0.73). In addition, there was a modest (r≈0.5), but significant, correlation between smooth pursuit and vergence tracking performance in patients with schizophrenia. Our observations clearly demonstrate substantial vergence tracking deficits in patients with schizophrenia. In these patients, deficits for smooth pursuit and vergence tracking are partially correlated suggesting overlap in the central control of smooth pursuit and vergence eye movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Bolding
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, GSB 315, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA; Department of Vision Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, WORB 186, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA
| | - Adrienne C Lahti
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, SC 501, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA
| | - David White
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, SC 501, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA
| | - Claire Moore
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, GSB 315, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA
| | - Demet Gurler
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, GSB 315, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA
| | - Timothy J Gawne
- Department of Vision Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, WORB 186, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, USA
| | - Paul D Gamlin
- Department of Ophthalmology, 1103 Shelby Building, 1825 University Blvd., University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vernet M, Quentin R, Chanes L, Mitsumasu A, Valero-Cabré A. Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operations. Front Integr Neurosci 2014; 8:66. [PMID: 25202241 PMCID: PMC4141567 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The planning, control and execution of eye movements in 3D space relies on a distributed system of cortical and subcortical brain regions. Within this network, the Eye Fields have been described in animals as cortical regions in which electrical stimulation is able to trigger eye movements and influence their latency or accuracy. This review focuses on the Frontal Eye Field (FEF) a “hub” region located in Humans in the vicinity of the pre-central sulcus and the dorsal-most portion of the superior frontal sulcus. The straightforward localization of the FEF through electrical stimulation in animals is difficult to translate to the healthy human brain, particularly with non-invasive neuroimaging techniques. Hence, in the first part of this review, we describe attempts made to characterize the anatomical localization of this area in the human brain. The outcome of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Magneto-encephalography (MEG) and particularly, non-invasive mapping methods such a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) are described and the variability of FEF localization across individuals and mapping techniques are discussed. In the second part of this review, we will address the role of the FEF. We explore its involvement both in the physiology of fixation, saccade, pursuit, and vergence movements and in associated cognitive processes such as attentional orienting, visual awareness and perceptual modulation. Finally in the third part, we review recent evidence suggesting the high level of malleability and plasticity of these regions and associated networks to non-invasive stimulation. The exploratory, diagnostic, and therapeutic interest of such interventions for the modulation and improvement of perception in 3D space are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Vernet
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM UMRS 975 and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
| | - Romain Quentin
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM UMRS 975 and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
| | - Lorena Chanes
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM UMRS 975 and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
| | - Andres Mitsumasu
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM UMRS 975 and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
| | - Antoni Valero-Cabré
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM UMRS 975 and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France ; Laboratory for Cerebral Dynamics Plasticity and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Boston University Boston, MA, USA ; Cognitive Neuroscience and Information Technology Research Program, Open University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Krishna N, O’Neill H, Sánchez-Morla EM, Thaker GK. Long range frontal/posterior phase synchronization during remembered pursuit task is impaired in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2014; 157:198-203. [PMID: 24951402 PMCID: PMC4127487 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) is a reliable endophenotype of schizophrenia, exact underlying cognitive and neural substrates remain unknown. A simple mechanistic model of SPEM assumes an efficient interaction in integrating sensory input from the medial temporal (MT)/medial superior temporal (MST) brain regions and subsequent motor response through the frontal eye field (FEF). Poor functional connectivity between these two regions could explain impaired motion perception and SPEM maintenance in schizophrenia. In the present study, we combined an eye tracking paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG) recordings to investigate the putative functional connectivity among frontal/posterior brain regions in mediating the modulation of SPEM. Twenty four schizophrenic (SZ) and 22 healthy control (HC) participants performed remembered pursuit tasks with EEG recordings. Behaviorally, HC subjects showed significant improvement in SPEM response on repeated presentations of target compared to SZ subjects. Neurophysiologically HC subjects showed higher frontal/posterior phase synchronization in the beta to low gamma range frequency bands during all target presentations. In addition there was a significant increase in phase synchronization in the beta-2 frequency band in HC subjects during late compared to early target presentation. In contrast, higher frontal/posterior phase synchronization in the beta-2 frequency predicted better performance during late target presentation and lower enduring psychosis in SZ subjects. These data suggest a pathologically perturbed connectivity between frontal and posterior cortical regions during SPEM in SZ. The integrative eye tracking-EEG approach used in this study to dissect the endophenotype may reveal novel targets for studying schizophrenia psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithin Krishna
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Izawa Y, Suzuki H. Activity of fixation neurons in the monkey frontal eye field during smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 2014; 112:249-62. [DOI: 10.1152/jn.00816.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We recorded the activity of fixation neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) in trained monkeys and analyzed their activity during smooth pursuit eye movements. Fixation neurons were densely located in the area of the FEF in the caudal part of the arcuate gyrus facing the inferior arcuate sulcus where focal electrical stimulation suppressed the generation of saccades and smooth pursuit in bilateral directions at an intensity lower than the threshold for eliciting electrically evoked saccades. Whereas fixation neurons discharged tonically during fixation, they showed a variety of discharge patterns during smooth pursuit, ranging from a decrease in activity to an increase in activity. Of these, more than two-thirds were found to show a reduction in activity during smooth pursuit in the ipsilateral and bilateral directions. The reduction in activity of fixation neurons began at pursuit initiation and continued during pursuit maintenance. When catch-up saccades during the initiation of pursuit were eliminated by a step-ramp target routine, the reduced activity of fixation neurons remained. The reduction in activity during pursuit was not dependent on the activity during fixation without a target. Based on these results, we discuss the role of the FEF at maintaining fixation in relation to various other brain areas. We suggest that fixation neurons in the FEF contribute to the suppression of smooth pursuit. These results suggest that FEF fixation neurons are part of a more generalized visual fixation system through which suppressive control is exerted on smooth pursuit, as well as saccades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Izawa
- Department of Systems Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisao Suzuki
- Department of Systems Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chen Y, Norton D, Stromeyer C. Prolonged temporal interaction for peripheral visual processing in schizophrenia: evidence from a three-flash illusion. Schizophr Res 2014; 156:190-6. [PMID: 24814873 PMCID: PMC4096562 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Revised: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coherent perception of the visual world requires orderly processing of spatially and temporally distributed visual information across the visual field. The organization of this visual information is impaired in schizophrenia. We previously found that visual temporal integration in patients is prolonged, using flashes presented to the central fovea. In this study, we investigated this temporal interaction in both the fovea and fairly far out in the peripheral visual field. METHODS We used a 'three-flash' illusion paradigm in which two spatially-coincident light pulses (of 1 ms each) are perceived by healthy individuals as one, two or three flashes depending on the time interval between the pulses. In each trial, two light pulses were presented in the fovea or 34° out in the right visual field. The inter-stimulus pulse interval (ISI) ranged from 30 to 310 ms. The task for patients (n=28) and controls (n=26) was to indicate the number of flashes (one, two or three) perceived after each two-pulse presentation. RESULTS For the controls, the peak of the three-flash illusion was shifted to longer ISIs (150 ms) in the periphery compared to the fovea (110 ms). For the patients, the three-flash illusion was greater and occurred at longer ISIs (270 ms in the periphery and 190 ms at the fovea). CONCLUSION Compared to the central visual field, the range of temporal interactions in the periphery is prolonged to a greater extent in schizophrenia. This exacerbated temporal expansion in peripheral vision suggests a coarse temporal resolution for visual and cognitive organization in this mental disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Chen
- McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, United States.
| | | | - Charles Stromeyer
- Division of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Harvard University (emeritus)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Savaki HE, Gregoriou GG, Bakola S, Moschovakis AK. Topography of Visuomotor Parameters in the Frontal and Premotor Eye Fields. Cereb Cortex 2014; 25:3095-106. [DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
48
|
Fesi JD, Thomas AL, Gilmore RO. Cortical responses to optic flow and motion contrast across patterns and speeds. Vision Res 2014; 100:56-71. [PMID: 24751405 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Revised: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Motion provides animals with fast and robust cues for navigation and object detection. In the first case, stereotyped patterns of optic flow inform a moving observer about the direction and speed of its own movement. In the case of object detection, regional differences in motion allow for the segmentation of figures from their background, even in the absence of color or shading cues. Previous research has investigated human electrophysiological responses to global motion across speeds, but only focused upon one type of optic flow pattern. Here, we compared steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses across patterns and speeds, both for optic flow and for motion-defined figure patterns, to assess the extent to which the processes are pattern-general or pattern-specific. For optic flow, pattern and speed effects on response amplitudes varied substantially across channels, suggesting pattern-specific processing at slow speeds and pattern-general activity at fast speeds. Responses for coherence- and direction-defined figures were comparatively more uniform, with similar response profiles and spatial distributions. Self- and object-motion patterns activate some of the same circuits, but these data suggest differential sensitivity: not only across the two classes of motion, but also across the patterns within each class, and across speeds. Thus, the results demonstrate that cortical processing of global motion is complex and activates a distributed network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy D Fesi
- Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.
| | - Amanda L Thomas
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 114 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States
| | - Rick O Gilmore
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 114 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States; Social, Life, & Engineering Sciences Imaging Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kurkin S, Akao T, Fukushima J, Shichinohe N, Kaneko CRS, Belton T, Fukushima K. No-go neurons in the cerebellar oculomotor vermis and caudal fastigial nuclei: planning tracking eye movements. Exp Brain Res 2013; 232:191-210. [PMID: 24129645 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3731-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 09/30/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The cerebellar dorsal vermis lobules VI-VII (oculomotor vermis) and its output region (caudal fastigial nuclei, cFN) are involved in tracking eye movements consisting of both smooth-pursuit and saccades, yet, the exact role of these regions in the control of tracking eye movements is still unclear. We compared the neuronal discharge of these cerebellar regions using a memory-based, smooth-pursuit task that distinguishes discharge related to movement preparation and execution from the discharge related to the processing of visual motion signals or their memory. Monkeys were required to pursue (i.e., go), or not pursue (i.e., no-go) in a cued direction, based on the memory of visual motion direction and go/no-go instructions. Most (>60 %) of task-related vermal Purkinje cells (P-cells) and cFN neurons discharged specifically during the memory period following no-go instructions; their discharge was correlated with memory of no-go instructions but was unrelated to eye movements per se during the action period of go trials. The latencies of no-go discharge of vermal P-cells and cFN neurons were similar, but were significantly longer than those of supplementary eye field (SEF) no-go neurons during an identical task. Movement-preparation signals were found in ~30 % of smooth-pursuit-related neurons in these cerebellar regions and some of them also carried visual memory signals. Our results suggest that no-go neurons are a newly revealed class of neurons, detected using the memory-based pursuit task, in the oculomotor vermis-cFN pathway and that this pathway contributes specifically to planning requiring the working memory of no-go instructions and preparation of tracking eye movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Kurkin
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Abnormal smooth pursuit eye movements in patients with schizophrenia are often considered a consequence of impaired motion perception. Here we used a novel motion prediction task to assess the effects of abnormal pursuit on perception in human patients. Schizophrenia patients (n = 15) and healthy controls (n = 16) judged whether a briefly presented moving target ("ball") would hit/miss a stationary vertical line segment ("goal"). To relate prediction performance and pursuit directly, we manipulated eye movements: in half of the trials, observers smoothly tracked the ball; in the other half, they fixated on the goal. Strict quality criteria ensured that pursuit was initiated and that fixation was maintained. Controls were significantly better in trajectory prediction during pursuit than during fixation, their performance increased with presentation duration, and their pursuit gain and perceptual judgments were correlated. Such perceptual benefits during pursuit may be due to the use of extraretinal motion information estimated from an efference copy signal. With an overall lower performance in pursuit and perception, patients showed no such pursuit advantage and no correlation between pursuit gain and perception. Although patients' pursuit showed normal improvement with longer duration, their prediction performance failed to benefit from duration increases. This dissociation indicates relatively intact early visual motion processing, but a failure to use efference copy information. Impaired efference function in the sensory system may represent a general deficit in schizophrenia and thus contribute to symptoms and functional outcome impairments associated with the disorder.
Collapse
|