Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Determinants of Clinical Outcomes for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Multisite Prospective Cohort Study

A loading dose of clofazimine to rapidly achieve steady-state-like concentrations in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial disease

OBJECTIVES

Clofazimine is a promising drug for the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) diseases. Accumulation of clofazimine to reach steady-state plasma concentrations takes months. A loading dose may reduce the time to steady-state-like concentrations. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a loading dose regimen in patients with NTM disease.

METHODS

Adult participants received a 4-week loading dose regimen of 300 mg clofazimine once daily, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg once daily (combined with other antimycobacterial drugs). Blood samples for PK analysis were collected on three occasions. A population PK model for clofazimine was developed and simulations were performed to assess the time to reach steady-state-like (target) concentrations for different dosing regimens.

RESULTS

Twelve participants were included. The geometric mean peak and trough clofazimine concentrations after the 4-week loading phase were 0.87 and 0.50 mg/L, respectively. Adverse events were common, but mostly mild and none led to discontinuation of clofazimine. Our loading dose regimen reduced the predicted median time to target concentrations by 1.5 months compared to no loading dose (3.8 versus 5.3 months). Further time benefit was predicted with a 6-week loading dose regimen (1.4 versus 5.3 months).

CONCLUSION

A 4-week loading dose regimen of 300 mg once daily reduced the time to target clofazimine concentrations and was safe and well-tolerated. Extending the loading phase to 6 weeks could further decrease the time to target concentrations. Using a loading dose of clofazimine is a feasible strategy to optimize treatment of NTM disease.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT05294146.

Role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is a challenge to effective treatment. Multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) can be difficult to treat, requiring long durations of therapy and the use of second line drugs, increasing a patient's risk for toxicities and treatment failure. Given the challenges treating MDR-TB, clinicians can improve the likelihood of successful outcomes by utilizing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM is a clinical technique that utilizes measured drug concentrations from the patient to adjust therapy, increasing likelihood of therapeutic drug concentrations while minimizing the risk of toxic drug concentrations. This review paper provides an overview of the TDM process, pharmacokinetic parameters for MDR-TB drugs, and recommendations for dose adjustments following TDM.

Why do we use 100 mg of clofazimine in TB and NTM treatment?

Current tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease guidelines recommend the use of clofazimine in a 100 mg once-daily dose. The rationale behind this exact dose is not provided. I performed a literature review to determine the reasoning behind the current dosing regimen. The current 100 mg once-daily dose of clofazimine stems from a deliberate attempt to find the minimum effective daily dose in leprosy treatment, driven by efficacy, economical and toxicity considerations. While this dose is safe, economical and practical, a higher dose with a loading phase may add relevant efficacy and treatment-shortening potential to both tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease treatment. We need to revisit dose-response and maximum tolerated dose studies to get the best out of this drug, while continuing efforts to generate more active r-iminophenazine molecules that accumulate less in skin and intestinal tissues and have pharmacokinetic properties that do not require loading doses.

Simplified urine-based method to detect rifampin underexposure in adults with tuberculosis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Variable pharmacokinetics of rifampin in tuberculosis (TB) treatment can lead to poor outcomes. Urine spectrophotometry is simpler and more accessible than recommended serum-based drug monitoring, but its optimal efficacy in predicting serum rifampin underexposure in adults with TB remains uncertain. Adult TB patients in New Jersey and Virginia receiving rifampin-containing regimens were enrolled. Serum and urine samples were collected over 24 h. Rifampin serum concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and total exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) over 24 h (AUC0-24) was determined through noncompartmental analysis. The Sunahara method was used to extract total rifamycins, and rifampin urine excretion was measured by spectrophotometry. An analysis of 58 eligible participants, including 15 (26%) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, demonstrated that urine spectrophotometry accurately identified subtarget rifampin AUC0-24 at 0-4, 0-8, and 0-24 h. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC ROC) values were 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.90), 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.94), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), respectively. These values were comparable to the AUC ROC of 2 h serum concentrations commonly used for therapeutic monitoring (0.82 [95% CI 0.71-0.92], P = 0.6). Diabetes status did not significantly affect the AUC ROCs for urine in predicting subtarget rifampin serum exposure (P = 0.67-0.92). Spectrophotometric measurement of urine rifampin excretion within the first 4 or 8 h after dosing is a simple and cost-effective test that accurately predicts rifampin underexposure. This test provides critical information for optimizing tuberculosis treatment outcomes by facilitating appropriate dose adjustments.

Is there a need to optimise pyrazinamide doses in patients with tuberculosis? A systematic review

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a first-line antituberculosis drug with potent sterilising activity. Variability in drug exposure may translate into suboptimal treatment responses. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the concentration-effect relationship. In vitro/in vivo studies had to contain information on the infection model, PZA dose and concentration, and microbiological outcome. Human studies had to present information on PZA dose, measures of drug exposure and maximum concentration, and microbiological response parameter or overall treatment outcome. A total of 34 studies were assessed, including in vitro (n = 2), in vivo (n = 3) and clinical studies (n = 29). Intracellular and extracellular models demonstrated a direct correlation between PZA dose of 15-50 mg/kg/day and reduction in bacterial count between 0.50-27.7 log10 CFU/mL. Consistent with this, higher PZA doses (>150 mg/kg) were associated with a greater reduction in bacterial burden in BALB/c mice models. Human pharmacokinetic studies displayed a linear positive correlation between PZA dose (i.e. 21.4-35.7 mg/kg/day) and drug exposure (AUC range 220.6-514.5 mg·h/L). Additionally, human studies confirmed a dose-effect relationship, with an increased 2-month sputum culture conversion rate at AUC/MIC targets of 8.4-11.3 with higher exposure/susceptibility ratios leading to greater efficacy. A 5-fold variability in AUC was observed at PZA dose of 25 mg/kg. A direct concentration-effect relationship and increased treatment efficacy with higher PZA exposure to susceptibility ratios was observed. Taking into account variability in drug exposure and treatment response, further studies on dose optimisation are justified.