Efficacy of a 4-Antigen Staphylococcus aureus Vaccine in Spinal Surgery: The STRIVE Randomized Clinical Trial

Feasibility of using a combination of staphylococcal superantigen-like proteins 3, 7 and 11 in a fusion vaccine for Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant bacterial pathogen in both community and hospital settings, and the escalation of antimicrobial-resistant strains is of immense global concern. Vaccination is an inviting long-term strategy to curb staphylococcal disease, but identification of an effective vaccine has proved to be challenging. Three well-characterized, ubiquitous, secreted immune evasion factors from the staphylococcal superantigen-like (SSL) protein family were selected for the development of a vaccine. Wild-type SSL3, 7 and 11, which inhibit signaling through Toll-like receptor 2, cleavage of complement component 5 and neutrophil function, respectively, were successfully combined into a stable, active fusion protein (PolySSL7311). Vaccination of mice with an attenuated form of the PolySSL7311 protein stimulated significantly elevated specific immunoglobulin G and splenocyte proliferation responses to each component relative to adjuvant-only controls. Vaccination with PolySSL7311, but not a mixture of the individual proteins, led to a > 102 reduction in S. aureus tissue burden compared with controls after peritoneal challenge. Comparable antibody responses were elicited after coadministration of the vaccine in either AddaVax (an analog of MF59) or an Alum-based adjuvant; but only AddaVax conferred a significant reduction in bacterial load, aligning with other studies that suggest both cellular and humoral immune responses are necessary for protective immunity to S. aureus. Anti-sera from mice immunized with PolySSL7311, but not individual proteins, partially neutralized the functional activities of SSL7. This study confirms the importance of these SSLs for the survival of S. aureus in vivo and suggests that PolySSL7311 is a promising vaccine candidate.

Inborn errors of immunity with susceptibility to S. aureus infections

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a significant human pathogen, in particular in patients with an underlying medical condition. It is equipped with a large variety of virulence factors enabling both colonization and invasive disease. The spectrum of manifestation is broad, ranging from superficial skin infections to life-threatening conditions like pneumonia and sepsis. As a major cause of healthcare-associated infections, there is a great need in understanding staphylococcal immunity and defense mechanisms. Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) frequently present with pathological infection susceptibility, however, not all of them are prone to S. aureus infection. Thus, enhanced frequency or severity of S. aureus infections can serve as a clinical indicator of a specific underlying immunological impairment. In addition, the analysis of immunological functions in patients with susceptibility to S. aureus provides a unique opportunity of understanding the complex interplay between staphylococcal virulence and host immune predisposition. While the importance of quantitatively and qualitatively normal neutrophils is widely known, less awareness exists about the role of specific cytokines such as functional interleukin (IL)-6 signaling. This review categorizes well-known IEI in light of their susceptibility to S. aureus and discusses the relevant associated pathomechanisms. Understanding host-pathogen-interactions in S. aureus infections in susceptible individuals can pave the way for more effective management and preventive treatment options. Moreover, these insights might help to identify patients who should be screened for an underlying IEI. Ultimately, enhanced understanding of pathogenesis and immune responses in S. aureus infections may also be of relevance for the general population.

Reverse development of vaccines against antimicrobial-resistant pathogens

Vaccine R&D is typically a lengthy process taking >10 years. However, vaccines still fail in clinical development because of unreliable animal models or absent immunological correlates of protection. Without a correlate of protection, phase-1 and -2 studies of safety and immunogenicity can fail to predict phase-3 efficacy. Indeed, the history of vaccine development is replete with promising phase-1 and -2 results and failed phase-3 efficacy trials. To avoid this misfortune, we present Reverse Vaccine Development for vaccines against antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) pathogens. In this approach, instead of evaluating efficacy in phase 3, proof-of-principle efficacy is evaluated as early as possible in a population with a high incidence of disease, which may differ from the population intended for registration, and can be a controlled human infection population. To identify a correlate of protection in these populations, the vaccine-elicited immune response is compared between protected and unprotected subjects. If a correlate is identified, it can help to refine the vaccine dosage, schedule, and formulation, and facilitate the assessment of vaccine efficacy in other populations with different attack rates, subject characteristics, and disease manifestations. This may be the only way to provide life-saving vaccines to populations affected by AMR-pathogen diseases at incidences that are typically low and unsuited to phase-3 efficacy trials. The availability of a correlate of protection early in clinical development can potentially prevent failures of large phase-3 trials and unnecessary exposures of populations to inefficacious vaccines that have resulted in disinvestment in the development of vaccines against AMR pathogens.

Dry and liquid formulations of IBT-V02, a novel multi-component toxoid vaccine, are effective against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from low-to-middle income countries

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in the U.S. as well as more serious invasive diseases, including bacteremia, sepsis, endocarditis, surgical site infections, osteomyelitis, and pneumonia. These infections are exacerbated by the emergence of antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), highlighting the need for alternatives to antibiotics to treat bacterial infections. We have previously developed a multi-component toxoid vaccine (IBT-V02) in a liquid formulation with efficacy against multiple strains of Staphylococcus aureus prevalent in the industrialized world. However, liquid vaccine formulations are not compatible with the paucity of cold chain storage infrastructure in many low-to-middle income countries (LMICs). Furthermore, whether our IBT-V02 vaccine formulations are protective against S. aureus isolates from LMICs is unknown. To overcome these limitations, we developed lyophilized and spray freeze-dried formulations of IBT-V02 vaccine and demonstrated that both formulations had comparable biophysical attributes as the liquid formulation, including similar levels of toxin neutralizing antibodies and protective efficacy against MRSA infections in murine and rabbit models. To enhance the relevancy of our findings, we then performed a multi-dimensional screen of 83 S. aureus clinical isolates from LMICs (e.g., Democratic Republic of Congo, Palestine, and Cambodia) to rationally down-select strains to test in our in vivo models based on broad expression of IBT-V02 targets (i.e., pore-forming toxins and superantigens). IBT-V02 polyclonal antisera effectively neutralized toxins produced by the S. aureus clinical isolates from LMICs. Notably, the lyophilized IBT-V02 formulation exhibited significant in vivo efficacy in various preclinical infection models against the S. aureus clinical isolates from LMICs, which was comparable to our liquid formulation. Collectively, our findings suggested that lyophilization is an effective alternative to liquid vaccine formulations of our IBT-V02 vaccine against S. aureus infections, which has important implications for protection from S. aureus isolates from LMICs.

Exploring the role of bacterial virulence factors and host elements in septic arthritis: insights from animal models for innovative therapies

Septic arthritis, characterized as one of the most aggressive joint diseases, is primarily attributed to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and often results from hematogenous dissemination. Even with prompt treatment, septic arthritis frequently inflicts irreversible joint damage, leading to sustained joint dysfunction in a significant proportion of patients. Despite the unsatisfactory outcomes, current therapeutic approaches for septic arthritis have remained stagnant for decades. In the clinical context, devising innovative strategies to mitigate joint damage necessitates a profound comprehension of the pivotal disease mechanisms. This entails unraveling how bacterial virulence factors interact with host elements to facilitate bacterial invasion into the joint and identifying the principal drivers of joint damage. Leveraging animal models of septic arthritis emerges as a potent tool to achieve these objectives. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the historical evolution and recent advancements in septic arthritis models. Additionally, we address practical considerations regarding experimental protocols. Furthermore, we delve into the utility of these animal models, such as their contribution to the discovery of novel bacterial virulence factors and host elements that play pivotal roles in the initiation and progression of septic arthritis. Finally, we summarize the latest developments in novel therapeutic strategies against septic arthritis, leveraging insights gained from these unique animal models.

Toxin-neutralizing Abs are associated with improved T cell function following recovery from Staphylococcus aureus infection

BACKGROUNDT cell responses are impaired in Staphylococcus aureus-infected children, highlighting a potential mechanism of immune evasion. This study tested the hypotheses that toxin-specific antibodies protect immune cells from bacterial killing and are associated with improved T cell function following infection.METHODSS. aureus-infected and healthy children (N = 33 each) were prospectively enrolled. During acute infection and convalescence, we quantified toxin-specific IgG levels by ELISA, antibody function using a cell killing assay, and functional T cell responses by ELISPOT.RESULTSThere were no differences in toxin-specific IgG levels or ability to neutralize toxin-mediated immune cell killing between healthy and acutely infected children, but antibody levels and function increased following infection. Similarly, T cell function, which was impaired during acute infection, improved following infection. However, the response to infection was highly variable; up to half of children did not have improved antibody or T cell function. Serum from children with higher α-hemolysin-specific IgG levels more strongly protected immune cells against toxin-mediated killing. Importantly, children whose serum more strongly protected against toxin-mediated killing also had stronger immune responses to infection, characterized by more elicited antibodies and greater improvement in T cell function following infection.CONCLUSIONThis study demonstrates that, despite T cell impairment during acute infection, S. aureus elicits toxin-neutralizing antibodies. Individual antibody responses and T cell recovery are variable. These findings also suggest that toxin-neutralizing antibodies protect antigen-presenting cells and T cells, thereby promoting immune recovery. Finally, failure to elicit toxin-neutralizing antibodies may identify children at risk for prolonged T cell suppression.FUNDINGNIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01AI125489 and Nationwide Children's Hospital.

Infection prevention-how can we prevent transmission of community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile organism, capable of existing as a commensal organism while also possessing pathogenic potential. The emergence of clinically and genetically distinct strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), termed community-onset MRSA (CO-MRSA), resulted in an epidemic of invasive and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in otherwise healthy individuals without traditional risk factors. Colonization with S. aureus is a risk factor for developing infection and also a source of transmission to close contacts. Outbreaks of S. aureus SSTI have been described in crowded settings and within households. Thus, preventive strategies are essential to interrupt recurrent infections.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to prevent transmission of CO-MRSA. We highlight key clinical trials that emphasize the importance of household and environmental S. aureus colonization in propagating household transmission. Finally, we highlight research priorities to prevent S. aureus infection.

SOURCES

We cite primary literature from peer-reviewed publications as sources for this review.

CONTENT

Our recommended approach to the management of individuals presenting with skin abscesses includes optimal treatment of the initial infection and hygiene education. Decolonization measures should be recommended for individuals with recurrent SSTIs or whose household members have SSTIs. Targeted decolonization with topical antimicrobials should be prescribed to all affected individuals within the household.

IMPLICATIONS

S. aureus infections result in substantial mortality and morbidity because of the high incidence of recurrent skin infections. Although current decolonization strategies are beneficial, interventions are often costly to families and effectiveness wanes over time. Results from a recently completed trial evaluating integrated periodic decolonization and household environmental hygiene will further add to our understanding of what constitutes a sustainable decolonization approach. In addition, novel preventive strategies are being developed such as S. aureus vaccines, lytic agents, probiotics, microbiota transplants, and phage therapy.