Frequent Door Openings During Cardiac Surgery Are Associated With Increased Risk for Surgical Site Infection: A Prospective Observational Study

What is the effect of reducing the air change rate on the ventilation effectiveness in ultra-clean operating rooms?

BACKGROUND

The operating room (OR) department is one of the most energy-intensive departments of a hospital. The majority of ORs in the Netherlands have an air-handling installation with an ultra-clean ventilation system. However, not all surgeries require an ultra-clean OR.

AIM

To determine the effect of reducing the air change rate on the ventilation effectiveness in ultra-clean ORs.

METHODS

Lower air volume ventilation effectiveness (VELv) of conventional ventilation (CV), controlled dilution ventilation (cDV), temperature-controlled airflow (TcAF) and unidirectional airflow (UDAF) systems were evaluated within a 4 × 4 m measuring grid of 1 × 1 m. The VELv was defined as the recovery degree (RD), cleanliness recovery rate (CRR) and air change effectiveness (ACE).

FINDINGS

The CV, cDVLv and TcAFLv ventilation systems showed a comparable mixing character in all areas (A, B and AB) when reducing the air change rate to 20/h. Ventilation effectiveness decreased when the air change rate was reduced, with the exception of the ACE. At all points for the UDAF-2Lv and at the centre point (C3) of the TcAFLv, higher RD10Lv and CRRLv were measured when compared with the other examined ventilation systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The ventilation effectiveness decreased when an ultra-clean OR with an ultra-clean ventilation air-supply system was switched to an air change rate of 20/h. Reducing the air change rate in the OR from an ultra-clean OR to a generic OR will reduce the recovery degree (RD10) by a factor of 10-100 and the local air change rate (CRR) by between 42% and 81%.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society turnkey order set for surgical-site infection prevention: Proceedings from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery ERAS Conclave 2023

OBJECTIVES

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) after cardiac surgery increase morbidity and mortality, consume health care resources, impair recovery, and diminish patients' quality of life. Numerous guidelines and expert consensus documents have been published to address the prevention and management of SSIs. Our objective is to integrate these documents into an order set that will facilitate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based best practices for preventing and managing SSIs after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Subject matter experts were consulted to translate existing guidelines and literature into a sample turnkey order set for SSI reduction. Orders derived from consistent class I, IIA, or equivalent recommendations across referenced guidelines and consensus manuscripts appear in the turnkey order set in bold type. Selected orders that were inconsistent class I or IIA, class IIB or otherwise supported by published evidence, were also included in italicized type.

RESULTS

Preventative care begins with the preoperative identification of both modifiable and nonmodifiable SSI risks by health care providers. Assessment tools can be used to assist in identifying patients at a high risk of SSI. Preoperative recommendations include screening for and treating Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. Intraoperatively, tailored prophylactic intravenous antibiotics and maintaining blood glucose levels below 180 mg/dL are essential elements. Postoperative care includes maintaining normothermia, glucose control and patient engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the well-documented advantages of a multidisciplinary care pathway for SSI in cardiac surgery, there are inconsistencies in its adoption and implementation. This article provides an order set that incorporates recommendations from existing guidelines to prevent SSI in the cardiac surgical population.

Antiseptic Techniques in Breast Implant Surgery: Insights From Plastic Surgeons in Saudi Arabia

Background

Breast implant surgery is a popular procedure worldwide, and the same holds true for Saudi Arabia. Ensuring a sterile surgical environment is crucial to avert postoperative infections. This study explores the various antiseptic techniques adopted by Saudi plastic surgeons during breast implant procedures.

Objectives

This study aims to assess Saudi plastic surgeons' adherence to antiseptic measures in breast implant surgery, and determine what types of antiseptic measures are most commonly used among Saudi plastic surgeons.

Methods

The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey among board-certified plastic surgeons in Saudi Arabia, collecting data through a self-administered online questionnaire. This questionnaire, which covered their demographic information and their antiseptic practices during breast implant surgery, was disseminated via a WhatsApp (Menlo Park, CA) broadcast message from May 15 to June 27, 2023.

Results

Of the 52 Saudi plastic surgeons who completed the questionnaire, all reported employing preoperative antibiotics and skin disinfection. Other measures included pocket irrigation (86.5%), implant irrigation (92.3%), sleeve/funnel usage (65.4%), nipple shield usage (51.9%), and glove change during the procedure (96.2%). Nearly, all respondents used only a surgical cap for head cover (96.2%) and postoperative antibiotics as prophylaxis (98.1%). However, more than half of them did not minimize door movement during the procedure (51.9%).

Conclusions

This study offers a valuable insight into the antiseptic practices during breast implant surgery in Saudi Arabia. The findings underline the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines for antiseptic practices in this field.

Level of Evidence 5

The real-time remote testing and programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A case series report

Minimizing the number of personnel in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) and the times of CCL door openings contribute to reduce the infection risk of medical staff and patients, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The usage of 5G-CTP system enables device specialists to conduct remote parameter testing and programming without entering the CCL, potentially reducing the exposure risk of medical staff and patients to COVID-19 infection.

A bundle of infection control measures reduces post-operative sternal wound infection due to Staphylococcus aureus but not Gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective analysis of 6,903 patient episodes

BACKGROUND

Prevention of cardiac surgical site infection has largely focused on reducing infection due to Staphylococcus aureus although other bacteria also play an important role in this complication.

AIM

We assess the impact of an evolving infection control program on the incidence of sternal wound infection (SWI) and the changing incidence of non-staphylococcal infections.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent primary sternotomy at a single UK centre between September 2010 and May 2018. Data were collated from two-years prior to the stepwise introduction of a broad-ranging infection control program, including S. aureus decolonisation.

FINDINGS

6,903 primary sternotomies were performed of which 2.6% (n=178) were complicated by SWI. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and S. aureus were most commonly identified as causative pathogens (45.5% and 30.3% respectively). Following program introduction there was a reduction in the rate of SWI from 3.9 to 1.8 cases/100 patients/month. This was mainly due to a sustained reduction in S. aureus infected cases with no discernible impact on GNB. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified coronary artery bypass grafting, procedural urgency and procedures performed in the 3rd quarter as independent risk factors for post-operative infection.

CONCLUSION

A multifaceted infection control program was successful at reducing the rate of SWI primarily due to a reduction in S. aureus infections. GNB also play an important role in SWI and traditional preventative measures fail to address these. Future intervention and impact assessments should consider Gram negative infection when measuring effectiveness.

Operating room ventilation systems: Recovery Degree, Cleanliness Recovery Rate and Air Change Effectiveness in an ultra-clean area

BACKGROUND

Entrainment test methods are described in most European standards and guidelines to determine the protected area for Ultra-Clean Ventilation (UCV) systems. New UCV systems, such as temperature-controlled airflow (TcAF) and controlled-dilution ventilation (cDV) claim the whole Operating Room (OR) to be ultra-clean. Current test standards are not developed for assessing ventilation effectiveness outside the standard protected area.

AIM

To assess and compare the ventilation effectiveness of four types of OR ventilation systems in the ultra-clean area by using a uniform test grid.

METHODS

In this study the ventilation effectiveness (VE) of four ventilation systems is evaluated for three different ultra-clean (protected) areas; standard protected area (A), area outside standard protected area (B) and large protected area (AB). The VE is defined as the recovery degree (RD), cleanliness recovery rate (CRR) and air change effectiveness (ACE).

FINDINGS

RD, CRR and ACE were significantly higher for the Uni Directional Air Flow (UDAF) system when compared to the other systems in area A. In area B, UDAF and cDV were comparable regarding RD and CRR and UDAF and Conventional Ventilation (CV) were comparable regarding ACE. In area AB the UDAF and cDV were comparable regarding CRR and ACE but are significantly different in RD.

CONCLUSION

In area A the ventilation effectiveness of the UDAF ventilation system is outperforming other ventilation systems. In area B, cDV is performing the best followed by UDAF, TcAF and CV. In area AB, UDAF is performing the best followed by cDV, TcAF and CV.

Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common and most costly health care-associated infections, leading to adverse patient outcomes and death. Wound contamination occurs with each incision, but proven strategies exist to decrease the risk of SSI. In particular, improved adherence to evidence-based preventive measures related to appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis can decrease the rate of SSI. Aggressive surgical debridement and effective antimicrobial therapy are needed to optimize the treatment of SSI.

Are operating room distractions, interruptions and disruptions associated with performance and patient safety? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The operating room is a complex environment in which distractions, interruptions and disruptions (DIDs) are frequent. Our aim was to synthesize research on the relationships between DIDs and (i) operative duration, (ii) team performance, (iii) individual performance and (iv) patient safety outcomes in order to better understand how interventions can be designed to mitigate the negative effects of DIDs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and reference lists were systematically searched. Included studies were required to report the quantitative outcomes of the association between DIDs and team performance, individual performance and patient safety. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on a subset of studies reporting total operative time and DIDs.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were identified. The majority were prospective observational studies (n = 15) of moderate quality. DIDs were often defined, measured and interpreted differently in studies. DIDs were significantly associated with extended operative duration (n = 8), impaired team performance (n = 6), self-reported errors by colleagues (n = 1), surgical errors (n = 1), increased risk and incidence of surgical site infection (n = 4) and fewer patient safety checks (n = 1). A random-effects meta-analysis showed that the proportion of total operative time due to DIDs was 22.0% (95% confidence interval 15.7-29.9).

CONCLUSION

DIDs in surgery are associated with a range of negative outcomes. However, significant knowledge gaps exist about the mechanisms that underlie these relationships, as well as the potential clinical and non-clinical benefits that DIDs may deliver. Available evidence indicates that interventions to reduce the negative effects of DIDs are warranted, but current evidence is not sufficient to make recommendations about potentially useful interventions.

A review of recommendations for infective endocarditis prevention in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a new disease entity. The rate of IE after TAVI is similar to that after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but mortality and prevalence of Enterococcus spp. as causing pathogens are significantly higher. Guidelines on infection prevention measures before TAVI procedures are currently lacking. We performed a structured review of the available data to provide interim recommendations based on guidelines to prevent infections issued by the World Health Organization as well as guidelines by professional societies from Europe and the USA. Such interim recommendations based on expert opinions are probably justified until large randomised trials provide strong evidence for infection control in TAVI, because IE after TAVI is often related to the TAVI procedure itself and the associated mortality rate is high. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be adapted from an intravenous cephalosporin to, e.g., amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, to cover enterococci. In addition, infection control should follow operating room standards as far as is reasonable, even if the evidence for this recommendation is very low. These recommendations are endorsed by the International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID).

Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Knowledge and Practices of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) refers to the utilization of antibiotic agents for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI), to prevent SSI-associated morbidity and mortality, reduce duration and cost of healthcare, and cause minimal adverse drug effects. The adherence rate among surgeons for the available international and national guidelines and optimal practice remains considerably low in many hospitals, especially in developing countries. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and compliance rate for SAP guidelines among various surgical specialties and those involved in providing SAP. Methods: An institution-based exploratory, multi-specialty, collective, mixed method approach (qualitative and quantitative) was used to assess the knowledge and compliance rate for SAP guidelines among the consultants and residents of surgical specialties. Quantitative analysis was performed using a pre-tested questionnaire. For qualitative analysis, focus group discussions were conducted. Thematic analysis was conducted by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results: Twenty-eight focus groups and 16 paired interviews were undertaken. On thematic analysis six significant themes were noted and mapped to the COM-B model, and subthemes mapped to the relevant TDF domains in a combined framework. Key themes recognized were: (1) solitary focus on surgical skills; (2) following the hierarchy is more important than guideline compliance; (3) doubts and overcautious attitude of surgeons hinders appropriate SAP prescribing; (4) non-availability in-hospital supply of antimicrobial agents; (5) patient characteristics and type of surgery play a role in prescribing SAP; and (6) lack of national and local guidelines. Conclusions: The knowledge and attitudes of surgeons toward appropriate SAP prescribing are crucial factors for execution of guidelines. Including them in policy making decisions can help in strong execution of the same.

Are three antiseptic paints needed for safe preparation of the surgical field? A prospective cohort study with 239 patients

Background

Preoperative skin antisepsis is an essential component of safe surgery. However, it is unclear how many antiseptic paints are needed to eliminate bacteria prior to incision. This study compared microbial skin counts after two and three antiseptic paints.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study in non-emergency patients receiving a cardiac/abdominal surgery with standardized, preoperative skin antisepsis consisting of an alcoholic compound and either povidone iodine (PI) or chlorhexidine (CHX). We obtained three skin swabs from the participant’s thorax/abdomen using a sterile template with a 25 cm² window: After collection of the first swab prior to skin antisepsis, and once the second and third application of PI/CHX had dried out, we obtained a second and third swab, respectively. Our primary outcome was the reduction in microbial skin counts after two and three paints of PI/CHX.

Results

Among the 239 enrolled patients, there was no significant difference in the reduction of mean square root-transformed microbial skin counts with three versus two paints (P = 0.2). But distributions of colony forming units (CFUs) decreased from paint 2 to 3 in a predefined analysis (P = 0.002). There was strong evidence of an increased proportion of patients with zero CFU after paint 3 versus paint 2 (P = 0.003). We did not identify risk factors for insufficient reduction of microbial skin counts after two paints, defined as the detection of > 5 CFUs and/or ≥ 1 pathogens.

Conclusions

In non-emergency surgical patients, three antiseptic paints may be superior to two paints in reducing microbial skin colonization prior to surgery.

Risk factors for surgical site infections in abdominal surgeries in Ghana: emphasis on the impact of operating rooms door openings

Major surgery carried out in low- and middle-income countries is associated with a high risk of surgical site infections (SSI), but knowledge is limited regarding contributory factors to such infections. This study explores factors related to patients developing an SSI in a teaching hospital in Ghana. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures was conducted at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. Patient characteristics, procedures and environmental characteristics were recorded. A 30-day daily surveillance was used to diagnose SSI, and Poisson regression analysis was used to test for association of SSI and risk factors; survival was determined by proportional hazard regression methods. We included 358 patients of which 58 (16.2%; 95% CI 12.7-20.4%) developed an SSI. The median number of door openings during an operation was 79, with 81% being unnecessary. Door openings greater than 100 during an operation (P = 0.028) significantly increased a patient's risk of developing an SSI. Such patients tended to have an elevated mortality risk (hazard ratio 2.67; 95% CI 0.75-9.45, P = 0.128). We conclude that changing behaviour and practices in operating rooms is a key strategy to reduce SSI risk.

In-Room Ultraviolet Air Filtration Units Reduce Airborne Particles During Total Joint Arthroplasty

Reducing airborne bioburden in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is of critical importance. The efficacy of crystalline ultraviolet-C (C-UVC) filtration in reducing bioburden in a dynamic operating room (OR) environment has not been evaluated. We assessed whether C-UVC filtration reduced (i) total particle counts (TPC); (ii) viable particle counts (VPC); and (iii) colony-forming units (CFUs). Fifty primary TJA cases were performed in a positive-pressure OR; 25 cases with the C-UVC unit and 25 cases without. The air was sampled by a particle counter and an impact air sampler to measure particle counts and CFUs, respectively. To compare TPC, VPC, and CFU/m³ between groups, independent t tests and multivariate regression, adjusted for number of OR staff and door openings, were performed. The C-UVC group had significantly lower TPC (2.6 × 10⁶ vs. 4.7 × 10⁶ particles, p = 0.001) and VPC (18,605 vs. 27,516 particles, p = 0.001). There were fewer CFUs in the C-UVC group (10.9 CFU/m³ vs. 13.7 CFU/m³ , p = 0.163). Multivariate analysis identified C-UVC filtration as a significant predictor of decreased TPC (β = -0.44, p = 0.002) and VPC (β = -0.47, p = 0.001) after accounting for door openings and number of OR staff. The reduction in CFUs was not significant on multivariate analysis. In this prospective pilot study, a C-UVC air disinfection and recirculation unit led to a significant reduction in both TPC and VPC and a non-significant reduction in CFU. Statement of clinical significance: Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of C-UVC filtration units on surgical-site infection rates. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:431-437, 2020.

A comprehensive unit-based safety program for the reduction of surgical site infections in plastic surgery and hand surgery

OBJECTIVE

To reduce surgical site infection (SSI) incidence in plastic surgery and hand surgery.

DESIGN

Uncontrolled before-and-after study.

SETTING

Department of plastic surgery and hand surgery of a tertiary-care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing surgery between January 2016 and April 2018.

INTERVENTION

A comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) consisting of a bundle of evidence-based SSI prevention strategies and a change in safety culture was fully implemented after a 14-month baseline surveillance and implementation period. SSI surveillance was performed over an intervention period of another 14 months, and differences in SSI rates between the 2 periods were calculated. Adherence with bundle components and risk factors for SSI were further evaluated in a case-cohort analysis.

RESULTS

Of 3,321 patients, 63 (1.9%) developed an SSI, 38 of 1,722 (2.2%) in the baseline group and 25 of 1,599 (1.6%) in the intervention group (P = .20). The CUSP was associated with an adjusted relative SSI risk reduction of 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4%-65%; P = .048) in multivariable analysis, whereas the need for revision surgery increased SSI risk (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% CI, 1.31-5.30; P = .007). During the intervention period, the proportion of checklists completed was 62.4%, and no difference in adherence with bundle components between patients with and without SSI was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This CUSP helped reduce SSI in a surgical specialty with a low baseline SSI incidence, even though adherence with checklist completion was moderate and the main modifiable risk factors remained unchanged over time. Programs that include safety culture change may more effectively promote SSI reduction than prevention bundles alone.

Optimizing compliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery at a referral teaching hospital in southern Iran: clinical and economic impact

Background

Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the major approaches to prevent surgical site infection. Despite the availability of international guidelines on it, the practice of antibiotic prophylaxis is still far from optimal. This study aimed to assess the impact of guideline implementation on the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics and its cost-saving effect in gastrointestinal surgery by clinical pharmacist intervention.

Methods

A pre and post intervention study was carried out between October 2017 and June 2018 on patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery in a major referral teaching hospital in Shiraz, southern Iran. The intervention phase consisted of revising the institutional guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, assigning a clinical pharmacist to the surgical department, and arranging several meetings with the surgical department regarding the appropriate utilization of antibiotics. Differences in antibiotic utilization in patients before and after the intervention phase were compared. Exposures were surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis timing and agents, and main outcomes were incidence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay.

Results

A total of 430 patients were included in the post intervention phase, while 445 patients were included in the baseline evaluation. Promoting appropriate antibiotic use in the post intervention group had the potential to decrease medication costs by reducing unnecessary prescriptions and duration of antibiotic usage (P<0.001). In the pre intervention group, the mean cost of antibiotic prescriptions was 11.5 times that of the post intervention group. Mean hospitalization in the pre intervention group was greater than the post intervention group (P<0.001). Furthermore, our data revealed that the rate of postsurgery infection in the post intervention group was 3.03%, while this rate was 6.76% in the preintervention group (P=0.01).

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines increased the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics, with substantial cost savings in patients who underwent surgery.

Improvement in staff behavior during surgical procedures to prevent post-operative complications (ARIBO2): study protocol for a cluster randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate staff behaviour during surgical procedures may disrupt the surgical performance and compromise patient safety. We developed an innovative monitoring and feedback system combined with an adaptive approach to optimise staff behaviour intraoperatively and prevent post-operative complications (POC) in orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS/DESIGN

This protocol describes a parallel-group, cluster randomised, controlled trial with orthopaedic centre as the unit of randomisation. The intervention period will last 6 months and will be based on the monitoring of two surrogates of staff behaviour: the frequency of doors opening and the level of noise. Both will be collected from incision to wound closure, using wireless sensors and sonometers, and recorded and analysed on a dedicated platform (Livepulse®). Staff from centres randomised to the intervention arm will be informed in real time on their own data through an interactive dashboard available in each operating room (OR), and a posteriori for hip and knee replacement POC. Aggregated data from all centres will also be displayed for benchmarking. A lean method will be applied in each centre by a local multidisciplinary team to analyse baseline situations, determine the target condition, analyse the root cause(s), and take countermeasures. The education and awareness of participants on the impact of their behaviour on patient safety will assist the quality improvement process. The control centres will be blinded to monitoring data and quality improvement approaches. The primary outcome will be any POC occurring during the 30 days post operation. We will evaluate this outcome using local and national routinely collected data from hospital discharge and disease databases. Thirty orthopaedic centres will be randomised for a total of 9945 hip and knee replacement surgical procedures.

DISCUSSION

The field of human factors and behaviour in the OR seems to offer potential room for improvement. An intervention providing goal-setting, monitoring, feedback and action planning may reduce the traffic flow and interruptions/distractions of the surgical team during procedures, preventing subsequent POCs. The results of this trial will provide important data on the impact of OR staff behaviour on patient safety, and promote best practice during surgical procedures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03158181 .